Hi All!
Being in Boston, MA last weekend, I observed this guest enjoying
a shower under the sprinklers.
I took a few shots through the mosquito net, but when I tried to open
the screen door the visitor rushed away.
Having looked at Mark Cassino's pages, I think this bird is called
American
On May 4, 2006, at 2:34 AM, mike wilson wrote:
Tigger is a character in the A.A.Milne books featuring Winnie the
Pooh. I think someone made some cartoon films on the subject.
Disney bought the rights and screwed everything up. As usual.
- Dave (has been to Pooh Corner)
On May 4, 2006, at 2:51 AM, John Francis wrote:
These guys have an interesting product:
http://www.GlobalImagination.com/
They look really cool... I'd certainly like one. Can they be hooked
into Google Earth?
When I was at university (mid 90's) there was a guy working with a
I'd be a nice scene if the trees were still there... large areas of
felled forest really depress me.
- Dave
On May 4, 2006, at 4:24 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Looks like a wonderful scene but the blown out sky totally ruins it
for me.
Larger for non-Flickrites:
Love the broken-window look. Or did you drop your camera? :)
- Dave
On May 4, 2006, at 12:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Took this about 10m days ago.
istD 16-45 with r70 filter and tripod.
Hand zoomed at 2 f 22 iso 1600
ACR minor adjust and
Shel,
I've twice tried to reply to your recent email to me about Salgado (for
which, thanks), but your email provider is bouncing my emails. It says
Dynamic IPs/open relays blocked. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED].
So if you thought I was being rude in not replying, I wasn't!
I'm not sure what it
-Original Message-
From: AvK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 1. mai 2006 09:21
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: May PUG is open
Hi folks,
the May PUG is open.
It can be found at http://pug.komkon.org
Have Fun it is small but nice.
Nice indeed.
I liked 'green' by Adelheid v.
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/05/03 Wed PM 10:00:46 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: just a pussycat - Re: tigger woods
On 5/3/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I forget who said it but entirely agree with the sentiment that golf is
a good
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/05/04 Thu AM 04:54:19 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT - PESO - Blackbird and Insect
Hi!
I try not to post non-Pentax pics here, but I thought some of the
twitchers here might like to see this. A nest of Blackbird
On 5/4/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judging by the girth of the midsection of some golfers that I've seen,
it's not the most active of activities, either.
cheers,
frank, continuing to duck g
Hey! I resemble that.
Just for that I'm going to try and hit one of the many
Yeah. Totally screwed.
The books are fabulous. The cartoon version is very...? Cartoonish.
The characters are turned into something... two dimensional ;-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C.
On 4/5/06, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Starlings always remind me of teenagers. Noisy, full of life and scared
of very little. Especially with a face full of fast food.
They evidently like a shag, too!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
On 3/5/06, Gonz, discombobulated, unleashed:
He's got a bad monitor. I can see the feet clearly. The guy on the
left is wearing red sneakers.
He's also sucking the guy on the right's toes.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On 4/5/06, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/?
action=viewcurrent=zoomir.jpg
Dave, I suppose that's what an Enterprise away team sees when they are
beamed in to the location... ;-)
Extremely out of worldly image...
That's a macro shot
I'm with Marnie here.
It _is_ interesting, but _I_ don't read any getting bad news into her face.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
On 4/5/06, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Fascinating. So you said in another post your were hanging out... I
wonder how you did not scare the bird ;-).
Well, I started off standing outside looking straight up the wall but my
neck was beginning to ache and I was too lazy to go get
David Savage wrote:
Just for that I'm going to try and hit one of the many
cyclists who use the road adjacent to the first fairway. :-)
Must be something in the water; I've just been asked to play a round of golf
and I've just bought a decent racing cycle.
I've only played 2 rounds this
Ain't thrilled about the subject, but I do admire your technique, that's
superb.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Shel
Conceptually it fits the bill. But I find it too busy and confused to
convey a clear message. The figure of interest is lost in the business
of the setting.
Paul
On May 4, 2006, at 1:04 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
One from the archives ...
I'm preparing submission to another gallery show and
Juan. I love this!
There is so much to like. The lovely lightly dressed girl, the two girls,
the sweet old man, the couple of guys on the right. And their body language!
I could spend a lot of time looking at this.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of
I agree about the felled forest, although these small cuts are much less
depressing than the old clear-cut method which would leave hectares
bare. These at least will be replanted within a year or two.
-Adam
David Mann wrote:
I'd be a nice scene if the trees were still there... large areas
On May 2, 2006, at 5:24 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
If the x marks and holes went on good works (at least ones
the photographer felt were his
best) then that could argued it was for money, but if he did
it knowing he was close
to death, I don't think it was about money.
It was near the end of
Blown out sky? It's all clouds, as I was shooting in the rain. They were
quite white rather than grey.
-Adam
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Looks like a wonderful scene but the blown out sky totally ruins it
for me.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message - From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On May 2, 2006, at 9:40 PM, graywolf wrote:
Please note that it the National Parks; the National Forests have
completely different rules, and the Bureau of Land Management land
has yet another set.
I was doing an outdoor photo shoot on some BLM land in Nevada when
two BLM guys came
Thanks every one for the comments so far.
Appreciated.
Ken, i'll post the colour version tonight when i get home.
Dave
Quoting Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dave, you get a B for creativity. Nicely done.
Makes me wonder how it looks in color.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message
Thanks to all who commented.
I'm missing a lot of messages from the list lately
so I don't know if mine are going thru or not.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 4:10 PM
To: PDML
Subject: PESO: A moment with the LX
On 5/4/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One from the archives ...
I'm preparing submission to another gallery show and the brief they
offered was Home Grown - Life in the USA. For reasons which
immediately reveal my twisted sensibilities, this photo popped into
my head:
Hi Bob ... Glad you got the message. I hope you were able to listen to
Salgado.
I don't understand what you're talking about. I don't know what a dynamic
IPs is, nor have I clue about open relays. I am, however, rather pissed
because, at least until recently, your mail had been getting through
Nice, Don. Very peaceful. I needed that!
Rick
--- Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Had to take a break and go shoot a few.
This is with the LX, M50/1.4 and a test roll of
Kodak Ultra Color.
A lo-res minilab scan but I rather like it.
http://www.donsauction.com/PDML/pentaxlx.htm
On May 4, 2006, at 1:07 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 3/5/06, Gonz, discombobulated, unleashed:
He's got a bad monitor. I can see the feet clearly. The guy on the
left is wearing red sneakers.
He's also sucking the guy on the right's toes.
h. kinky.
G
Patrick,
I really like the color version--much more of a sense
of presence somehow, certainly more warmth. Lots of
details (especially in the paintings) pop out that
weren't so apparent in the BW version.
Rick
--- Patrick Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thank you for your generous
I thought this was interesting... last sentence...from www.space.com.
A clandestine military payload was placed into orbit by Russian military
forces Wednesday in a launch from the nation's northern space base. The
craft is likely a new spy satellite that will serve the Russian defense
Hi,
This one just doesn't come together for me. It's a bit busy and, for me at
least, seems to be confusing. The message, or the story, doesn't come
across clearly.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
I'm preparing submission to another gallery show and the brief they
The open relay connection is a problem with Bob's ISP.
http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/0,,sid9_gci782509,00.html
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: RE: OT: Bouncing (RE: PESO - Bonnie's Chair
Hi Bob ... Glad you got the message. I hope you were
http://roman.blakout.net/?year=2006s=0category=portraitblog=20060416162229
It appears to me eye on portraits shall always require extra work to
bring that sparckle, to bring faces to life. Dark brows eyes are
wonderful, but measuring based on white skin shall always leave them
lifeless, so
David Mann wrote:
On May 4, 2006, at 2:34 AM, mike wilson wrote:
Tigger is a character in the A.A.Milne books featuring Winnie the
Pooh. I think someone made some cartoon films on the subject.
Disney bought the rights and screwed everything up. As usual.
- Dave (has been to Pooh
What these images cry out for is a more subtle light. From the looks of the
shadow on the ground it must have been around noon.
I know you have to take what you get but as nice as your captures are the
light needs to be less harsh.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Igor
Shel and others,
As a lurker on this list I see that mail problems are wide spread. I
also suspect that some domains have been harvested from this list as
well. What do I mean;
An open relay is a mail system that allows unauthenticated users to log
on to the mail server and relay mail
Blown out sky? It's all clouds, as I was shooting in the rain. They were
quite white rather than grey.
Yep. On my monitor there is no detail in the clouds, as in featureless.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO - Highway 5
The guy on the left is wearing red sneakers.
Nope. That's a lady!
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO - Cutting the Silence
On May 4, 2006, at 1:07 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 3/5/06, Gonz, discombobulated, unleashed:
He's
Anyone here know much about NiMH batteries?
I have a Canon GL1 digital camcorder and yesterday was doing a
commercial shoot with it. I hadn't used it for some time, and I
found that I was getting far less recording time than the batteries
are supposed to provide. The two-hour batteries
On 4/29/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a little known house in South Berkeley that is decorated with TV
sets. Today I grabbed a few shots with the DS and a K24/2.8. I'm not
happy with that lens on the DS - doesn't seem particularly sharp, some
actual focusing tests are in
All,
I think that this has been beaten to death already, but can someone who
knows summarize exactly what metadata gets lost when a files is converted
from Pentax Raw to Adobe DNG?
Thanks,
Mark
Mark Erickson wrote:
I think that this has been beaten to death already, but can someone who
knows summarize exactly what metadata gets lost when a files is converted
from Pentax Raw to Adobe DNG?
None at all.
Thanks,
Yer welcome.
There really wasn't any detail to get. Wonderfully unphotogenic white
overcast sky. I did blow out some of the sky (right along the mountain)
in the conversion when I increased the contrast, but even not blown out
there was no detail and only a hint of texture to the clouds.
-Adam
Kenneth
On 5/4/06, Malcolm Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip I've just bought a decent racing cycle.snip
Waddja buy? Something typically English, I hope. An old 1970's
Dawes. With Reynolds tubing, a Brooks saddle, 10 speeds and fold-up
tubulars.
g
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois
There really wasn't any detail to get. Wonderfully unphotogenic white
overcast sky. I did blow out some of the sky (right along the mountain)
in the conversion when I increased the contrast, but even not blown out
there was no detail and only a hint of texture to the clouds.
-Adam
Yes,
Easy: none.
Godfrey
On May 4, 2006, at 8:40 AM, Mark Erickson wrote:
All,
I think that this has been beaten to death already, but can someone
who knows summarize exactly what metadata gets lost when a files is
converted from Pentax Raw to Adobe DNG?
Thanks,
Mark
Now that brought me an image I just didn't need...
(Don't your neighbors complain To the Police??)
Cotty wrote:
I found a
very close vantage point trough my son's window.
The window was open and I was hanging out.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
Kenneth,
All images were taken between 3:14 and 3:15pm local time.
It is possible that what you think is being an effect of the harsh
light comes from the fact that I've choosen strong contrast
in the curve tab in the ACR.
Here is an example when I choose it to be linear.
Golf, is a good walk spoilt.
-- *Samuel Clemens*
Mark Roberts wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
On 5/3/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tiger Woods doesn't play sports, he's a golfer :)
You're right, Mark. Golf's not a sport, it's a game.
This is a silly question. Why not do the test yourself, you've got both
lenses...
Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Don
could you show me a comparison shot of the bokeh of the M100 and Tamron
90mm?
I own both lenses and wonder whether I should use the Pentax M 100 more...
thanks
Markus
Hi,
From what I can tell, none is lost.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Mark Erickson
I think that this has been beaten to death already, but can someone who
knows summarize exactly what metadata gets lost when a files is converted
from Pentax Raw to Adobe DNG?
So I landed a job doing some interior and exterior architectural
shots, plus some staff portraits and candids of the daily grind for a
local company. (Actually, it's a national chain, but I'm only doing
one branch.) As most of you know, I'm kind of a Luddite and have
refused to jump into the
-- Original message --
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So I landed a job doing some interior and exterior architectural
shots, plus some staff portraits and candids of the daily grind for a
local company. (Actually, it's a national chain, but I'm only
I didn't check it myself, but I remember reading that
this is correct only for the most recent RAW-DNG PS-CS2
converter (3.3) but was not the case for the earlier versions.
I am not sure in which version it was corrected (3.2 or 3.3).
Igor
Thu, 04 May 2006 09:13:09 -0700
Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 11:40:02AM -0400, Mark Erickson wrote:
All,
I think that this has been beaten to death already, but can someone who
knows summarize exactly what metadata gets lost when a files is converted
from Pentax Raw to Adobe DNG?
Thanks,
Mark
Short answer(1): The
frank theriault wrote:
On 5/3/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I forget who said it but entirely agree with the sentiment that golf is
a good walk, spoiled.
Among others (I'm sure), the quote has been attributed to Mark Twain.
The last time I played golf was some 15 or 16 years ago.
On 4/29/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29/4/06, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
Pulled from the deep recesses of the photo vault at Casa Belinkoff:
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/cw3.html
Cory?
I'm just starting to catch up with some older posts, but that sure as
hell
I checked they do.
Juan Buhler wrote:
After thinking about it a bit, I went ahead and made my prints limited
editions. 50 is the number:
http://www.jbuhler.com/buy/buy.php
My pictures look better already!
Get them now guys, who knows if tomorrow 50 museums will order one of
each... :)
Hmmm. Good scans are going to set you back a bunch. The scans you get from a
typical mini lab might not be adequate for professional work. Perhaps it's time
to jump.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So I landed a job doing some
Mark Roberts wrote:
Mark Erickson wrote:
I think that this has been beaten to death already, but can someone who
knows summarize exactly what metadata gets lost when a files is converted
from Pentax Raw to Adobe DNG?
None at all.
Are you sure? I thought that the conversion lost a few
On 5/4/06, keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I already had a lot of respect for you, Frank, but just gained a lot more!
What a guy! g
A man's got to know his limitations...
Many of the world's problems come from man's abysmal ignorance of that simple
fact.
Back when I was a young man, I
What point is there in considering versions of DNG Converter and
Camera Raw which have been superceded, if you are thinking of moving
to DNG format now/in the future? That's like saying, I'd like to
consider one of the new IBM ThinkPads, but ya know the IBM PC/AT had
a rather bad
On May 4, 2006, at 9:48 AM, John Francis wrote:
Short answer(1): The lens ID code.
Short answer(2): Nothing.
If you select the appropriate settings for DNG, the Pentax private
data
in the MakerNote tag will get copied to the DNG file, so no
information
is lost. The real problem is that
But have you seen the new three dimensional cartoons???
Tim Øsleby wrote:
Yeah. Totally screwed.
The books are fabulous. The cartoon version is very...? Cartoonish.
The characters are turned into something... two dimensional ;-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never
Is it possible to use the timer along with the auto bracket function with
the istDS v2.0? It seems only one or the other is available thru the
function menu.
Shel
Bob Shell wrote:
On May 2, 2006, at 5:24 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
If the x marks and holes went on good works (at least ones
the photographer felt were his
best) then that could argued it was for money, but if he did
it knowing he was close
to death, I don't think it was about
35mm or MF? You can get a 35mm dedicated scanner quite cheap these days,
the low-end Konica Minolta's are pretty good and below $300 if you can
find one new.
-Adam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm. Good scans are going to set you back a bunch. The scans you get from a
typical mini lab might
You have access to one or the other, not both at the same time.
Godfrey
On May 4, 2006, at 10:51 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Is it possible to use the timer along with the auto bracket
function with
the istDS v2.0? It seems only one or the other is available thru the
function menu.
Interesting comment, Paul; thanks!
The figure of interest *is* the setting and all the busyness in it,
at least in my view. Like a lot of my work, it comes across much
better in a larger scale than typical web-rez pages... Did you look
at the larger version?
(The original print I made in
On May 4, 2006, at 6:27 AM, frank theriault wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW6/06.htm
I don't know what it is, but I find something very compelling about
this image.
...
It's nice. I like it.
Thanks frank!
G
I got one of the one's that Henry's had listed. Had figured that
they were now too rare, and I'd never get one. Shipped
yesterday, arrived today. Condition is better than described --
essentially like new, and little used if at all. I think this
must have been store display stock.
Heading
Thanks.
Now, will auto bracket work with the remote control? If so, would you have
to be standing in front of the camera? From what I see in the manual,
that's the case, but I thought I'd ask anyway.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
On Thu, 04 May 2006 18:37:03 +0200, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Looks like I'll be paying the lab to scan the film.
I don't know what kind of lab you use, but make sure they scan to a
resolution that's acceptable to your cliënt. One hour photolabs here can
make a photo-CD quite
Godfrey,
I don't know what version Mark Erickson is using.
Not everybody updates versions every time the new one comes out.
So, if he were using 3.0, or Photoshop CS that comes with
2.x version, he might have wrong assumptions based on the response
that no information is lost.
That's why I made
Well, film scans will either set you back a lot of
money, or a lot of time and a little less money (if
you buy a film scanner). I just did a shoot for our
church that was partly digital, partly film (because I
wanted to use my fisheye zoom), and I'll tell ya, the
film part of that shoot is a pain
I hope that your immediate plans work out well and that you are
able to work meaningfully in photography again if you choose.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 5/2/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As most of you know, the life of a photofinisher has changed dramatically
over the past couple of years.
The color version does work much better, doesn't it? Georgeous.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 5/4/06, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patrick,
I really like the color version--much more of a sense
of presence somehow, certainly more warmth. Lots of
details (especially in the paintings) pop out that
Joseph Tainter wrote:
I got one of the one's that Henry's had listed. Had figured that they
were now too rare, and I'd never get one. Shipped yesterday, arrived
today. Condition is better than described -- essentially like new, and
little used if at all. I think this must have been store
Scott said he was going to have a lab scan the 50 shots. In southeast Michigan,
an area that includes quite a few pro shhoters and studios, I've found that
only the very best labs can produce good scans, and they don't come cheap. The
experience of others may vary.
-- Original
Around here the price and quality of scans varies considerably. Here's a
price list from one of the medium quality labs.
http://www.cantoo.com/PriceGuide0905.pdf
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: 5/4/2006 12:10:36 PM
Subject: Re: OT -
Thanks Shel. I have received the reply you had from Earthlink, and I will
have a look at it and think about what it says to see if there's anything I
can do about it from my end.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 May 2006
Again, with the IR remote, the Fn button's Drive Mode menu allows you
to choose the remote or bracketing, not both.
The infrared remote operates the camera in one of two modes,
depending upon how you set the custom function:
- Default mode is to simply release the shutter, presuming
On May 4, 2006, at 9:44 AM, Mark Erickson wrote:
None at all.
Are you sure? I thought that the conversion lost a few brand-
specific metadata fields related to the lens identity
As already mentioned in a couple of posts, this omission was
corrected in DNG Converter and Camera Raw
I've been working with a couple of negatives for the past day or two,
for the first time in about a year. I've got a lot experience with
the process, I've probably scanned about 3000-4000 negatives and
transparencies over the past 20 years.
There is no way I'd consider doing that as part
Hi gang,
Here's one from last week-end's foray in feathers:
http://www.oksne.net/paw/runde/lunde-1.html
Cheers,
Jostein
Hi Godfrey,
It's not that difficult, once you pass a certain threshold of
resources and understanding.
:-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SeePhoto Camera Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED];
PDML pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday,
Obviously, since I've solved the problem.
G
On May 4, 2006, at 1:52 PM, Jostein wrote:
It's not that difficult, once you pass a certain threshold of
resources and understanding.
This I really love about PayPal, when they want you to verify your bank
account so you can sign up, they make two small deposits that miraculously
appear in your bank account overnight. However, when you move PayPal funds
to your bank account it takes 3-4 days...hmm
Norm
From: Tom C
Good Luck, Mr. Robb
You mentioned there's a few things on your job plate for the
next few months. Photo related?
-Lon
Didn't W. Churchill refer to it something like - the process of putting a
very small ball into a very small hole, at great distances with tools
ill-equipped for the job?
Norm
From: frank theriault
On 5/3/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I forget who said it but entirely agree with
More bad news from the big yellow.
Just heard it on the radio news.
Googled this stuff on the web:
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/12627521/
http://today.reuters.com/investing/FinanceArticle.aspx?type=businessNewsstoryID=2006-05-04T162458Z_01_WEN6785_RTRUKOC_0_US-KODAK-EARNS.xml
My processing costs are going to double if I include scanning at
processing time. The lab technician stated that at their highest
resolution the scans should be good for at least an 8x10 print with a
decent photograph. I think he said they would be scanned at
2456*3636, or something close to
This will forever taint my opinion of you.
CW
Dork.
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 2:34 PM
Subject: Enabled -- FA* 200 F4 Macro
I got one of the one's that Henry's had listed. Had figured that
they
On Thu, 04 May 2006 18:42:15 +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What point is there in considering versions of DNG Converter and Camera
It's quite simple, Godfrey. (If you pause for a micro-second to think.)
He might have an earlier version. He might have access to an
The Pacific Arts League Weekend Show was a big success last week.
I've got two photos hanging in the Photo and Sculpture show at the
same venue, which opened yesterday.
I'd like to invite you to come see them and enjoy the reception.
---
May 3 - 26
Photo and Sculpture
:: Reception 6-9 pm
Why do you insist on this kind of falderal, John?
G
On May 4, 2006, at 4:13 PM, John Forbes wrote:
On Thu, 04 May 2006 18:42:15 +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What point is there in considering versions of DNG Converter and
Camera
It's quite simple, Godfrey. (If you
For your enjoyment. I'm just the messenger..
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Brian Schneider
Subject: Analog versus Digital Shootout
http://www.ales.litomisky.com/shootout/analogversusdigitalshootout.htm
- Original Message -
From: Gautam Sarup
Subject: Re: Another one bites the dust.
I hope that your immediate plans work out well and that you are
able to work meaningfully in photography again if you choose.
Heck, this frees me up to do all sorts of meaningfull things.
Like get my
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
