On Aug 17, 2006, at 4:07 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Manual focus screen.
That's something I'd like for any AF camera. Just a microprism spot
in the centre, please.
- Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I'm going to be putting my digital darkroom together
soon and I've decided on everything but the printer at
this point.
I want a large format ink jet and have been looking at
Canon and Epson. Both of the 17 wide $1800 printers
have gotten good reviews. I'm leaning toward the Epson
since I know a
I have the Epson R2400 highly recommend it. I got excellent prints
straight out of the box. And the BW prints are stunning.
I also have an older PrintFix profiler that I got bundled with my
Spyder2 Pro. I've never used it. I only use Epson Ilford paper and
their profiles are excellent.
Cheers,
I'm not much into guessing games, but for those who are, I noticed
this post from Aaron earlier today:
On Aug 16, 2006, at 6:01 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
If you shoot RAW you'll probably want nothing smaller than 2 Gig
cards
for this camera, because of the 10-megapixels and... other
David Savage wrote:
You've got 3 days (4 in some places) to get your Juxtaposition entry in.
I have to admit I'm struggling with this one.
I'm struggling too, big time!
I hereby submit a disclaimer in advance and direct all blame for
the quality (or lack of) in my entry (assuming I have
Thanks, Dave. Most people gush about their Epsons so
that would be a safe bet. However, the Canon uses a 12
color system which sounds intriguing. I just wonder
how that translates to $ in inks.
I think I'm going to try the ColorVision since the
custom profiling appeals to me. I'd like to be able
Hi Brendan,
I am in the exactly same situation right now. I am looking at
the Epson 4800 and the Canon IPF5000. The 5000 is pretty new
so there is no long term information available yet (good
source for information is the luminous-landscape forum).
What interests me mostly and what I have
Are you looking for a 13 gate or wider?
I've got the R2400 and am very happy with it. If I were to get
anything at this point, I'd stick with Epson and go for the R4800.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Is that Zingerman's Roadhouse? If so, I was there maybe fifteen years ago
... don't recall much about the food, but it was recommended by a couple of
friends who lived in South Dakota at the time. I recall them trying to put
food out like a NYC deli - didn't quite cut it for a New Yawka, but
. and there is a slot for them in my portable computer... ;o)
Shel Belinkoff wrote / skrev:
I like 'em. They're small, light, easy to carry, contribute to making the
camera smaller and lighter, they're inexpensive, and they're fun to launch
across the room.
Shel
[Original
Op Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:35:27 +0200 schreef Marco Alpert [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm not much into guessing games,
Yeah, right :o)
but for those who are, I noticed
this post from Aaron earlier today:
On Aug 16, 2006, at 6:01 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
If you shoot RAW you'll probably want
From: jtainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/08/16 Wed PM 10:45:22 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Testing the K100D and some more K10D hype
nononono
All that Was of CouRse entirely UNintentIOnal...
JostEin
-
So...Jostein's latest message should be decoded as:
Thinking along this line, and considering that music can be compressed with
variable bit rates so that the detail goes where it is needed and not where
it would be wasted, could image files be saved with variable bit depth?
Inky shadows and blue skies could get high compression and low bit
Thik of all the money we don't spend on film..
Yeah but you don't need any PC/Mac nor do you need a any software like
Adobe and such. If you lab was good then that was it.
William Robb
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Op Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:32:57 +0200 schreef Keith McGuinness
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
David Savage wrote:
You've got 3 days (4 in some places) to get your Juxtaposition entry
in.
I have to admit I'm struggling with this one.
I'm struggling too, big time!
I hereby submit a disclaimer in
One more thing came to my head about what Aaron could like in K10D.
What about in-camera RAW development? ;-)
Best regards
Sylwek
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Op Thu, 17 Aug 2006 09:38:20 +0200 schreef Anthony Farr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thinking along this line, and considering that music can be compressed
with
variable bit rates so that the detail goes where it is needed and not
where
it would be wasted, could image files be saved with
Yes, this is a good idea. Give us a jp4-file format!
Anthony Farr wrote / skrev:
Thinking along this line, and considering that music can be compressed with
variable bit rates so that the detail goes where it is needed and not where
it would be wasted, could image files be saved with variable
Still?
But you've become so mellow of late.
Regards,
Anthony Farr
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Thursday, 17 August 2006 2:01 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: photo dot net thread mentioning the
The compression gets optimized locally, but AFAIK the bit depth stays at
8bpp (24 bits overall) from top to bottom. To me the bit depth is much more
important than compression because that's where all the smooth gradations
and subtle tonalities come from. IMO the highlights could get away with
On Aug 17, 2006, at 6:32 PM, Keith McGuinness wrote:
I have to admit I'm struggling with this one.
I'm struggling too, big time!
One of my recent scans actually fit the bill. This will be my first
PUG in... quite a long time!
- Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
G'day Glen.
I have a 4gig AGL brand Sd card currently in use in the *ist Ds running the
latest firmware.
The Ds tells me that this card will hold 373 raw files.
The card has been formated in the Ds as well as on the computer via card
reader and is working fine.
Yesterday I took 178 RAW images
Well done Paul!
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
The newer Epsons don't seem to clog. My 2200 has never clogged in the
five years I've been using it.
Paul
On Aug 17, 2006, at 2:54 AM, Antti-Pekka Virjonen wrote:
Hi Brendan,
I am in the exactly same situation right now. I am looking at
the Epson 4800 and the Canon IPF5000. The 5000 is
We already have that. It's called shooting tiff or jpeg.
Paul
On Aug 16, 2006, at 11:22 AM, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
One more thing came to my head about what Aaron could like in K10D.
What about in-camera RAW development? ;-)
Best regards
Sylwek
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
This should demonstrate why digital photography needs more RD to correct
some deficiencies of shadow rendition. The examples are 8 bit for the web
of course, so 12 or more bit samples should be somewhat better.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4816986
Regards,
Anthony Farr
--
I don't think so. Image quality is important beacsue you will work
with it and apply effects.
Ifyou looose information: it is lost, period. Think JPEG vs RAW.
You can compress RAW of course...
2006/8/17, Anthony Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thinking along this line, and considering that music can be
On Aug 17, 2006, at 6:17 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
The newer Epsons don't seem to clog. My 2200 has never clogged in the
five years I've been using it.
Clogging is heavily dependent on usage. If you leave the printer for
long stretches without printing, it's more likely to clog. If you
I already had a look to try and help inspire me.
I'm still struggling. :-)
Dave
On 8/17/06, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ran into a nice junxtaposition in febuari, so I'm not complaining :o)
For those who are, it's junxtaposition _II_, so there's a whole gallery of
inspiration:
My thoughts are less towards lowering the bit depth of featureless areas
than they are towards raising the bit depth of darker and/or detail filled
areas. I could have made that clearer but chose an example that weighed in
the wrong direction :-(
Regards,
Anthony Farr
-Original
On 17.08.2006, at 12:19 , Paul Stenquist wrote:
We already have that. It's called shooting tiff or jpeg.
Paul
But we have very little control of this ;-) Much more can be done for
example in Olympus E-1.
Cheers,
Sylwek
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
8-))
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/08/17 Thu AM 01:42:29 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Re: left handed digital PS?
On 8/17/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/08/16 Wed PM
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/08/17 Thu AM 03:00:51 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: For those in the know about K10D
- Original Message -
From: Jim Apilado
Subject: Re: For those in the know about K10D
That's what digital
Raw rules!
But in addition to PEF (if they insist on keeping it), please implement
compressed DNG properly with full sized embedded JPEG in-camera as an
option.
Smaller file sizes = faster write times = more shots per card = less time
dumping to storage tanks (saves batteries/charge) = also
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Aug 17, 2006, at 6:17 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
The newer Epsons don't seem to clog. My 2200 has never clogged in the
five years I've been using it.
Clogging is heavily dependent on usage. If you leave the printer for
long stretches without printing, it's more
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
The simple solution is to continue to use your old camera with your old cards
-- you're not being forced to buy a new body, nor are you being forced to
discard your old one.
Now that's just silly, especially considering what you know about the
capabilities of the K10D.
What K10D will or will not be, time shows. If it's as good as *istDL, +
11 AF points then its all good + 10Mp gives more space to crop more and
compose less during the shooting.
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20060814223110
--
home http://roman.blakout.net/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
David Savage wrote:
The last post I can find from Wiggy is 22/06/05.
According to my archives he was only active for that month. Some
people just lack stamina.
What I find hilarious is his comment that criticizing Pentax isn't
tolerated. Do we ever do anything *else* here?!
Mark I Hate SD
Hi Gang.
I shot a horse show last weekend using the D1, file size is 1.1 meg
and pixel size is 2000 x 1312.
A customer is asking for a large print of 16x20. I found the upres
tutorial in Bruces Frasers book, but am wonder what i should res this
file up to to get a decent 11x14 and or
Mark Binder wrote:
I use a Spotmatic F and I have a Tamron 35-135mm zoom lens. I'm
interested in getting a different zoom, preferably one that goes up to
200mm and is not a push/pull type. Do you have any suggestions? Used
would best as I don't have a lot to spend.
I think push/pull zooms
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Aaron
Reynolds
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 1:52 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Printer Recommendations?
...
By the way, I do not at all recommend being on the bleeding edge with
I remember seeing reports (on luminous-landscape and other boards) that
also the newer Epsons (as well as the large format Epsons) clog
sometimes
even in the middle of a print. My 2000 has never clogged during a print.
And
on my 2000 the clog problem is not with the head but with the CIS tubing
Mark Roberts wrote:
It's also a point that some people just don't like SD cards. I hate SD
cards because they're too small. I don't *want* cards smaller than CF.
Me, either. Only something as worthless as a stick of gum should be
that easy to lose. :-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML
David J Brooks wrote:
A customer is asking for a large print of 16x20. I found the upres
tutorial in Bruces Frasers book, but am wonder what i should res this
file up to to get a decent 11x14 and or 16x20.
Any help here.
My current lab only goes to 11x14.
What's the native
On 8/16/06, Mark Binder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use a Spotmatic F and I have a Tamron 35-135mm zoom lens. I'm
interested in getting a different zoom, preferably one that goes up to
200mm and is not a push/pull type. Do you have any suggestions? Used
would best as I don't have a lot to
In keeping with my severe resolution hang-up, I've noted that the R1800
advertises having the smallest ink droplets in the industry, 1.5
picoliters. The R2400, 3.5 picoliters, but produces superior BW
prints.
This is my total offering on the subject.
Jack
--- Brendan MacRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Charles Robinson
Subject: Re: K100D antishake test #2
On Aug 16, 2006, at 19:28, William Robb wrote:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/antishake/antishake_2/index.html
The bummer about the ones with the really small aperture is that you
can see
On Aug 16, 2006, at 19:28, William Robb wrote:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/antishake/antishake_2/index.html
The bummer about the ones with the really small aperture is that you
can see dust on the sensor (OK, so it's really dust on the AA filter,
but still)!
-Charles
--
- Original Message -
From: Thibouille
Subject: Re: For those in the know about K10D
Thik of all the money we don't spend on film..
Yeah but you don't need any PC/Mac nor do you need a any software like
Adobe and such. If you lab was good then that was it.
You wouldn't
- Original Message -
From: Brendan MacRae
Subject: Printer Recommendations?
I'm going to be putting my digital darkroom together
soon and I've decided on everything but the printer at
this point.
I want a large format ink jet and have been looking at
Canon and Epson. Both of the
That's why the 1800 has one of the highest clogging rates of any of the
latest Epson printers!
The R2400 is worth every penny, minimal issues, better image quality :) -
More money :(
You often get what you pay for!
Richard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
At 7:16 AM -0600 8/17/06, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Thibouille
Subject: Re: For those in the know about K10D
Thik of all the money we don't spend on film..
Yeah but you don't need any PC/Mac nor do you need a any software like
Adobe and such. If you lab
That's because everyone wants quality for nothing, Bill!
Related: bad news for those who enjoyed the 12 cent prints from photolab.ca, as
TCN (who were providing the service) are shutting down operations.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: For
Bob W wrote:
I've never understood this, so maybe somebody could enlighten me. What
makes people think they have to crop the image to fit the paper?
To my mind it's a brain-upside-down way of thinking, but I've heard
and read it so often that perhaps it's me that's got something wrong.
same here
Sridhar
- Original Message -
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: PUG reminder
I already had a look to try and help inspire me.
I'm still struggling. :-)
Dave
On 8/17/06,
Op Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:35:26 +0200 schreef Steve Sharpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
At 7:16 AM -0600 8/17/06, William Robb wrote:
You wouldn't believe how much bitching and complaining about photolabs
we used to get on list before the istD hit the market.
A decent lab is hard to find.
I wouldn't
I just decided that I could blame it on my limited English vocabulary .-)
DagT
Fra: gibikote [EMAIL PROTECTED]
same here
Sridhar
- Original Message -
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 4:19 PM
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you saw what I get offlist, you'd understand.
William Robb
Listen you big lard! I apologized for that already... what more can I do?
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Humph! Only to be expected of you, Paul. Twas luck, I would give you a
pat on the back. But to praise you because you do what you do expertly,
expertly? Well, if needs be, jumping up an down excitedly. YOU WON!
YOU WON, PAUL!
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Well, anyone who has useless CF cards can send them to me. Only my
camera, my PDA, and my laptop use the things but I could probably put
one or two 0.5 to 1.0gb cards to use.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
So, you are a reactionary Luddite just like me? Next year the
manufactures will be going to the mini-SD cards. I too feel that there
is a point when things become too small for normal handling, as well as
too large. I do have a SD card in the PDA, but I choose to leave it in
and treat it as a
Lazy...
Tom C.
I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or
numbered.
From: Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: was Re: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:22:40 +0300
compose less
On 16/8/06, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've never understood this, so maybe somebody could enlighten me. What
makes people think they have to crop the image to fit the paper?
To my mind it's a brain-upside-down way of thinking, but I've heard
and read it so often that perhaps it's me
Well, it is called profit taking. The way around it is to sit on your
wallet for a few months. Of course with digital you probably will never
get to buy anything new if you do that grin.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
That is about what I live off of per month SIGH!.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Digital Image Studio wrote:
I only paid AU$700 for my 2GB CF
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 16/8/06, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
well, call me old-fashioned, but I think it should be a 'B' setting,
LX-style off-the-sensor metering, and no plastic.
You're old-fashioned.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On 16/8/06, Steve Sharpe, discombobulated, unleashed:
It was this one -
http://earth.delith.com/malin.html
Does this make me a pro, now?
:^)
Nice cliche.
Only kidding ;-) Lovely shot and well done.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Yes, that indeed is the best thing about digital for serious
photographers. Of course there were good labs around if you did enough
volume to be able to use them, they tended to have hefty surcharges on
small orders. Snapshot mini-labs were not the place to get quality work
done. I have not
Thanks Tom. I really appreciate the jumping up and down excitedly.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Humph! Only to be expected of you, Paul. Twas luck, I would give you a
pat on the back. But to praise you because you do what you do
Then you have never used even a merely decent lab.
But I will agree it was getting harder to find a decent lab outside of
very large cities in the decade or so prior to the event of digital. The
mini-labs were putting them out of business. You have to realize that
mass marketers do not run
graywolf wrote:
So, you are a reactionary Luddite just like me? Next year the
manufactures will be going to the mini-SD cards. I too feel that there
is a point when things become too small for normal handling, as well as
too large. I do have a SD card in the PDA, but I choose to leave it in
On 16/8/06, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
There's a recent thread over at the photodotnet Pentax forum that
mentions the PDML in a rather, well, unforgiving light. It made me
laugh out loud. Enjoy:
http://photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00Hfddtag=
Nice one Dave and Paul
Would you two please get a room.
Dave
On 8/17/06, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you saw what I get offlist, you'd understand.
William Robb
Listen you big lard! I apologized for that already... what more can I do?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Just few faces fit into my sense of color today. A vagabond musician
with clarinet and one of his listeners from the crowd.
http://roman.blakout.net/r-rated/460x690-IMGP6500.jpg
^^^one of a crowd
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20060817150419
^^^Just follow your ears when you hear the music, you
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 12:31:35PM +0100, Richard Day wrote:
Raw rules!
But in addition to PEF (if they insist on keeping it), please implement
compressed DNG properly with full sized embedded JPEG in-camera as an
option.
PEF, of course, already includes a full sized embedded JPEG
Room for what?
Tom C.
I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or
numbered.
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: photo dot net thread mentioning the pdml
Sounds like you played with a digital camera once, Scott. By the way, my
Oly requires about that much work after a battery change. Olympus fixed
that problem free under warranty (the capacitive devices that is
supposed to maintain power during a battery change were defective), but
I bought
On Aug 17, 2006, at 11:57 AM, graywolf wrote:
I have not checked but I suspect that many of those high volume
quality people labs are still doing business as most pro photographers
still make their money by shooting, not by sitting in front of a
computer
In Toronto and the surrounding
Nobody is in any doubt that it will be at least as good as the K100D,
which is already a step up from the DL.
Most of the angst comes from *ist-D shooters like myself - people for
whom all the later variants (DS, DL, DS2, DL2, K100D, K110D) have too
many drawbacks to be considered as *ist-D
I don't even want to guess
:-)
Dave
On 8/18/06, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Room for what?
Tom C.
I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or
numbered.
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To:
From: SpaceWeather.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: SpaceWeather.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Aurora Watch
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:26:53 -0500
Space Weather News for August 17, 2006
http://spaceweather.com
AURORA WATCH: An explosion on the sun yesterday (Aug. 16) hurled a coronal
mass ejection
Cotty wrote:
On 16/8/06, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
There's a recent thread over at the photodotnet Pentax forum that
mentions the PDML in a rather, well, unforgiving light. It made me
laugh out loud. Enjoy:
http://photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00Hfddtag=
Nice one
Indeed, a correctly implemented DNG with a full size hi-res embedded JPEG
would be best.
I use iView for archiving and it also uses the embedded full size JPEG
within DNG which, if you colour profile and correct in ACR within browser
and save as DNG, rather than the stand alone converter, that
I'm looking for something at 17 wide. I don't really
see myself doing anything larger than 16 x 20 (and
even at that, rarely). Anything bigger and I'll go to
a lab.
Yes, the 4800 is talked up so much I just can't ignore
it.
-B
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you looking for
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Aug 17, 2006, at 11:57 AM, graywolf wrote:
I have not checked but I suspect that many of those high volume
quality people labs are still doing business as most pro photographers
still make their money by shooting, not by sitting in front of a
computer
In Toronto
Come on folks - it's not that hard. What makes the 67 superior to almost ANY
digital camera - except for resolution?
The K10D closes this gap.
And - yes - I believe I did guess Aarons secret.
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
Antti-Pekka,
Thanks for the info! I hadn't heard that the Epson's
tended to clog. That's interesting. I too read that
the Canon doesn't require a swap-out to do the matte
finish.
I can't imagine going through the ink sets in 6 months
but who knows? Perhaps searching around for some
preventative
At 12:04 PM -0400 8/17/06, graywolf wrote:
Then you have never used even a merely decent lab.
You are probably right.
But I will agree it was getting harder to find a decent lab outside of
very large cities in the decade or so prior to the event of digital. The
mini-labs were putting them out
On 17/8/06, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Nice one Dave and Paul - I even get an honourable mention!
Well, a *mention*, at least.
;-)
Are you calling me *dis*honourable, pta'ak??
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Honourable
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/08/17 Thu PM 04:14:58 GMT
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Subject: Re: photo dot net thread mentioning the pdml
On 16/8/06, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
There's a recent thread over at the photodotnet Pentax forum
Good point, Aaron. That's one of the reasons that the
Canon isn't my top choice. I don't want to be a guinea
pig. Still, I supppose it's possible that out of the
box Canon may hit a home run. Who knows? Years and
years ago I gave my Dad my old BJ series bubble jet
(circa 1992) and it still prints
Jens,
If it was merely resolution, why the heck would Aaron be looking at the
K10D instead of a higher-resolution body from Nikon or Canon (Or a
Hasselblad or other MF body with a digiback).
Aaron specifically said it was something _no_ other DSLR offered yet.
And between the D2x, 5D, 1Ds
Kodak is shutting down some or all of its Kodachrome processing
capability in Switzerland, the only place in Europe where it's
currently being done.
Here's the catch: The headline says Kodak announces end dates for
Kodachrome motion picture film processing. Note MOTION PICTURE FILM
PROCESSING.
Hum, not sure that smaller droplets always translate
to print detail. The paper is a big variable here.
However, that's interesting, too. The 2400 has a huge
following, I know, but it's too small for what I want
to do.
-Brendan
--- Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In keeping with my severe
I've had Epson Photo printers since 1997.
Currently have three.
I've printed hundreds of prints from 4X6 to 13X19.
I had a printer sit for months without printing.
I only use Epson inks.
I normally run the cartridges till a color shows up missing.
My printers are always turned off at the
Dunno. I've never shot medium format. 4x5 is the best I've used.
Dave
On 8/18/06, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Come on folks - it's not that hard. What makes the 67 superior to almost ANY
digital camera - except for resolution?
The K10D closes this gap.
And - yes - I believe I did
A By big bright viewfinder!
Maybe the K10D has a x3 magnifier in the eyepiece that allows you to see the
whole area without cropping, just fantastic for accurate MF and macro work.
Oh, and great for old fogies like me who's eyesight is failing!
Richard
-Original Message-
From:
Kenneth Waller wrote:
I've had Epson Photo printers since 1997.
Currently have three.
I've printed hundreds of prints from 4X6 to 13X19.
I had a printer sit for months without printing.
I only use Epson inks.
I normally run the cartridges till a color shows up missing.
My printers are always
How about true 16 bit output ?
On 8/17/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jens,
If it was merely resolution, why the heck would Aaron be looking at the
K10D instead of a higher-resolution body from Nikon or Canon (Or a
Hasselblad or other MF body with a digiback).
Aaron specifically
http://www.dslrphoto.com/2006/08/17/japan-most-popular-digital-camera-ranking-aug-7-to-aug-13-2006/
Behind the Nikon D200 and the Sony A100, but ahead of a whole lot of
Canons and Nikons.
--
Mark Roberts Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
412-687-2835
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
1 - 100 of 251 matches
Mail list logo
