Agreed.
PENTAX: The camera for those with champagne taste and a beer pocketbook.
-- Walt
On 2/8/2011 12:48 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
PDML and beer. Its a natural pairing.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
Late to the party and replying out of sequence, myself. Apologies
for any confusion this may cause, but I was receiving the list in digest
form for a while, until a few days ago. So, I wasn't able to pull up
the original message in the thread.
Whenever I go on a photo walk, I generally
So, I now have this K1000 and a decent array of lenses to use on it.
Having finally figured out how to properly operate the camera after
wasting one roll of Fuji Superia X-tra 400 due to the fact that I opened
the back of the camera prematurely thinking I had it completely wound
(didn't
Hi all,
I thought I'd take the Pentaxes out after a little overnight snowfall
and risk drawing the ire of those who have seen quite enough snow for
the year thank-you-very-much.
I fumbled the focusing on the K 50/1.4 on quite a few of the shots I
took, unfortunately. It's going to take
Thanks for the tip, Bruce. It is much appreciated.
I'd forgotten that I had changed my settings over to JPEG while I was
taking snapshots during the Super Bowl gathering I went to last night.
I have a horrible habit of treating my camera like a point-and-shoot
sometimes, and being
Ha! Small world, indeed!
Nice to make your acquaintance, Collin.
Don't believe a word our mutual acquaintance tells you about me, except
the non-incriminating stuff.
-- Walt
On 2/7/2011 6:55 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
And a facebook friend
links to some quite nice bw shots.
Shot
Thanks, Ann. :-)
He was standing guard for the horse in that previous shot, so he had to
come and check me out and make sure I wasn't up to no good. He was
pretty friendly once he figured out I wasn't there to cause trouble, though.
I shot those with the digital K-x. I have a K1000
with a
totally-manual SLR will be at least a little bit more satisfying than
capturing the same shot in pixels, if only for the challenge.
But, that's just how I roll. :-)
-- Walt
On 2/7/2011 8:20 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Walter Gilbert wrote:
Thanks, Ann. :-)
He was standing guard
I've used canned air a couple of times, though I'm a little more leery
of it than Bill R., mainly because I'm a tad paranoid about the idea of
a freak propellant discharge.
Usually, I use one of those nasal bulb aspirators (http://is.gd/l6xxr3)
with a small hole punched in the back and a pet
I like that shot a lot. Nice.
-- Walt
On 2/5/2011 2:23 PM, Toine wrote:
Spring is knocking on my door:
http://www.repiuk.nl/index.php/blog-mainmenu-97/159-snowdrops
K20D SMC F28/2.8 (which is a little gem)
Toine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I didn't analyze it quite so deeply, but after reading Darren's
elucidation, I have to agree.
My first impression upon looking at it was that it's a very arresting
shot. I've definitely seen worse ones -- especially taken by myself.
I would definitely consider it a keeper.
-- Walt
On
Another very nice shot, Frank! I love the geometry of it, as well as
the isolated blues amid the greys.
I wish you'd stick to black and white and leave the color stuff to those
of us for whom it's a primary focus, dammit.
-- Walt
On 2/5/2011 8:19 PM, frank theriault wrote:
The University
more of the details. It was fascinating to
listen to the guy talk about it, but he jumped from one tangent to the
next, and it was hard to keep track of it all. I'm looking forward to
going back to talk to the guy again, though.
-- Walt
On 2/4/2011 2:21 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Walter
Thanks, Boris. :-)
I'm looking forward to getting out and doing some shooting ASAP. I just
haven't had many opportunities to do any fun shooting.
Perhaps this weekend.
-- Walt
On 2/2/2011 11:46 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
On 2/3/2011 3:28 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
Sounds like good
yet, but maybe someday soon.
-- Walt
On 2/3/2011 12:10 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
Can't say I recognize the last lens. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message - From: Walter Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 8:06 PM
Hi all,
In my absence from the list -- which, to the extent it was noticed, must
have been greatly appreciated -- I've managed to procure a few goodies
for a not-bad price, I think, but thought I'd get the opinions of folks
more knowledgeable than myself. I actually got a whole bunch of
Wow, Christine!
I was fortunate enough to fall just south of the line of weather. I
can't even imagine what a mess you folks are going to be dealing with up
there! I tell you one thing, though . . . I'm sure glad I don't work in
Allstate homeowners claims anymore. My old co-workers are
, Walter Gilbert wrote:
It's just that the printing around the front
element is ever-so-slightly different from what I've seen in images of
the same lens around the web. The imprint says:
ASAHI OPT. CO., JAPAN -- Pentax SMC M-50/1.4 -- 1093350
don't know what it means but mine reads literally
6619065
[mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Walter Gilbert
Sent: 02 February 2011 23:42
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Re-emerging, announcing enablement
Oops! I botched some cut n' pasting when I was editing the original
message for clarity -- as is typical.
Mine actually says:
1093350
to a collector.
stan
On Feb 2, 2011, at 6:24 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
In my absence from the list -- which, to the extent it was noticed, must have
been greatly appreciated -- I've managed to procure a few goodies for a not-bad
price, I think, but thought I'd get the opinions of folks more
Actually a K 50/1.2 -- as, apparently, they didn't make an M 1.2. ;-)
On 2/2/2011 7:02 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
All I can say is I plan to go back very soon and inquire as to whether
or not they might have an old M 50/1.2 lying around.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
enablement. Now go take some pictures! :-) Cheers,
Christine
- Original Message - From: Walter Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 5:24 PM
Subject: Re-emerging, announcing enablement
Hi all,
In my absence from
I think I've determined that it's an old Vivitar.
On 2/2/2011 8:06 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Does this thing look familiar at all to anyone?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Happened to me at Walmart ... and then the lady said, You must have
some camera!
Not sure how to reconcile that.
-- Walt
On 2/2/2011 8:42 PM, David Parsons wrote:
It's happened to me at Ritz and Walgreens a couple of times. I take
it as a compliment that they think my photography is that
Ha! Indeed.
Can you imagine how nice Eric Clapton's guitars must be?
On 2/2/2011 9:25 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Think of it like cooking with really nice pans. . .
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
I didn't know Cotty was Welsh.
-- Walt
On 1/14/2011 11:07 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
This is for Cotty
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
I have to cop to being a near-obsessive social networker, and have
been for a few years now -- well before I ever took my first photograph
with the intent of being a photographer rather than simply taking a
picture. In fact, along with my mother's illness (from which she is
recovering
Joined just this year, at the tender young age of 40.
It's been downhill ever since.
--- Walt
On 12/28/2010 8:42 PM, Tanya Love wrote:
So, it occurred to me after all these years on the list, that I may actually
not be the baby of the list anymore! How sad is that?! I am getting old!
That would be a situation where you literally couldn't see the forest
for the trees.
On 12/27/2010 2:36 AM, John Francis wrote:
Personally, I'd like to ponder how a forest of null trees would
look in any real way different from just a single null tree.
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:25:51AM
What a pleasant to surprise to see I made the list! Thanks, Mark,
for all the work you put in on this. I'm honored to have been included,
and sorry for being so late in responding. The past few days have been
unusually hectic even by holiday standards. My mother has been having a
Thank you, Larry.
Hmm ... Walter Pentax does have a ring to it. Much better than Walter
Phase-One.
Though, Walter Hasselblad sounds pretty authentic.
-- Walt
On 12/26/2010 1:06 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Dec 26, 2010, at 9:32 AM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
What a pleasant to surprise
Phase-One.
Though, Walter Hasselblad sounds pretty authentic.
-- Walt
On 12/26/2010 1:06 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Dec 26, 2010, at 9:32 AM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
What a pleasant to surprise to see I made the list! Thanks, Mark,
for all the work you put in on this. I'm honored to have been
Yeah ... just professional enough to make people suspicious.
On 12/26/2010 4:31 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Walter Nikon sounds more professional to me.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: Walter Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com
Subject: Re
:32 AM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
What a pleasant to surprise to see I made the list! Thanks, Mark,
for all the work you put in on this. I'm honored to have been included, and
sorry for being so late in responding. The past few days have been
unusually hectic even by holiday standards. My
Maybe you should contact this guy:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2010/12/26/national/a113305S63.DTL
-- Walt
On 12/26/2010 8:59 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
I mentioned that when I got home from my trip I found several emails
in my inbox indicating that my Gawker account was
The thing about those Aussie snakes ... the really deadly ones just
don't look all that deadly. Taipans, common browns, and even tiger
snakes all look like they'd make a nice belt, but that's about it. So,
a bite from that little whip tail would've had me thinking, Whelp!
Pretty sure
I have the same issue with the images coming out pretty dark, but I
always just assumed that had more to do with the brightness of the LCD.
I turn that down as far as I can to give me a reasonable expectation of
what my shot's going to look like, though it's still considerably
brighter
Nice shot, Paul. I like the sense of resignation in the guy's
posture. Very telling.
You didn't happen to get any shots focused on the girl on the right, I
take it. She looks quite fetching -- like I've had a few drinks.
-- Walt
On 12/19/2010 9:36 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
An
I was thinking the very same thing.
Very nice.
-- Walt
On 12/19/2010 12:06 PM, Bob W wrote:
Very nicely done. I think a photographer must have designed that path.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
Damn. Voluptuous is my favorite.
On 12/19/2010 4:19 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
On Dec 19, 2010, at 5:13 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Nice shot, Paul. I like the sense of resignation in the guy's posture.
Very telling.
You didn't happen to get any shots focused on the girl on the right, I
Welcome, Andy! I enjoyed looking through your work! I've had the
same experience you've had regarding the overall pace of the forums as
opposed to what goes on here. As I see it, I can go anywhere and be
called an idiot, so I figure I might as well confine it to a more
tight-knit circle.
Sorry to hear about the knee surgery. Hope it proceeds smoothly from
here on and that you're able to rest comfortably soon.
-- Walt
On 12/19/2010 4:59 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Interesting image. Best wishes for a full and complete recovery.
Dan
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 2:40 PM,
Ironically enough, when I posted a link to your Canadians Wearing
Hats photo blog to my Facebook page, I mentioned to one of the people
who commented on it that you had the good fortune of living in Canada,
where you can take photos of strangers on the street and stand a
reasonable chance
Just wondered if anyone might have any ideas regarding a good way to
shoot the upcoming convergence between the winter solstice and lunar
eclipse.
http://www.montrealgazette.com/life/Solstice+eclipse+first+years/3983582/story.html
I have some Wiccan friends I might surprise with a photo of
to look into
getting a nicer one soon.
Thanks for the response. Now that I've found a few videos about it,
I'll just do some experimentation over the next week to see if I can get
the hang of it.
-- Walt
On 12/18/2010 5:11 PM, Steve Sharpe wrote:
At 3:20 PM -0600 12/18/10, Walter Gilbert wrote
Yikes! Yeah, that's a bit much -- particularly on the girl with the
freckles.
-- Walt
On 12/17/2010 7:25 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
I understand the need to overly touch up portraits, but the software
Portrait Magic Professional Actions removes all evidence that the
person has skin. Am I
The '63 has been my dream car since I was a child. I know
everyone has opinions about Corvettes -- and their owners. But, as far
as I'm concerned, it's one of the most beautiful cars ever made.
-- Walt
On 12/17/2010 3:48 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Wasn't the split window on a 63?
Kenneth
That would explain it. I do wish I lived in a time and place where
there were more opportunities to take photographs like this.
On 12/17/2010 9:12 AM, eckinator wrote:
2010/12/17 Walter Gilbertldott...@gmail.com:
What is it about jazz that makes for such compelling photography?
simple.
Wow! Looks like the traffic for the t-shirts has crashed the site!
On 12/16/2010 10:04 PM, Nick David Wright wrote:
Dwayne's Photo in Parsons, KS, the last lab in the world to develop
the legendary Kodachrome film, has on sale Kodachrome memorial
t-shirts.
http://www.dwaynesphoto.com/
Yep ... looks like they're back up and running now. It was completely
down when I first clicked the link, and for about 10 minutes afterward.
They may have been doing some site maintenance, I reckon.
-- Walt
On 12/16/2010 10:34 PM, Nick David Wright wrote:
Working fine for me. ;-)
On
Hi all,
Just wanted to share this link with y'all and hope you enjoy it as much
as I did.
What is it about jazz that makes for such compelling photography?
http://www.npr.org/blogs/pictureshow/2010/12/16/132108519/leonard?sc=fbcc=fp
-- Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Seriously? I would never have thought that!
I may actually try that to see what it looks like, just for grins.
Thanks, Boris!
-- Walt
On 12/15/2010 12:09 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Walt, once I was told that using a flatbed scanner to actually take
pictures of jewelry can be a good
Thanks for the link, Bruce! Really informative stuff, there.
And, yes -- that guy must have a pretty robust budget.
-- Walt
On 12/15/2010 9:47 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On 10-12-13 2:19 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
I have a friend who makes some really nice turquoise jewelry
(http
might have had much the same reaction. It would
be interesting to see their reactions on a return trip in 20 years, when
they're able to fully process the scale of the atrocity.
Thanks for sharing this.
-- Walt
On 12/14/2010 4:50 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Just stepping out, so I can't watch
Very happy to hear this excellent news, Stan!
Enjoy the wine and serenity.
-- Walt
On 12/15/2010 8:30 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
After some processing delays and a bit of phone tag, I finally got the
pathology results today from my prostate surgery 2+ weeks ago. All very
positive - the
Excellent shots, Subash! Congratulations!
-- Walt
On 12/15/2010 9:33 PM, Subash wrote:
well, i went and did it too. :)
i had submitted a few photos a couple of times earlier, i think once in
2008 and once again in 2009 and all the photos got rejected both the
times. about a month ago i
Dammit, Frank. I'm sorry to hear that happened to you.
The world has a way of dealing with cowards like that. I suppose that's
the only consolation available to you at the moment.
I'm glad it wasn't as severe as it could've been, and hope you heal up
quickly and without too much pain.
Thank you, Christine!
I did the work last night, and some of the shots turned out surprisingly
well for two people who didn't have the foggiest notion what they were
doing.
I burned about 150 shots getting the lighting and staging right, but
once I finally got things situated, I got some
Great choices, Ted!
Very deserving of inclusion.
-- Walt
On 12/14/2010 6:31 AM, Theodore Beilby wrote:
On checking the PPG this morning, I find that two more shots have been accepted.
That makes a total of five. Also I found that two had been rejected, but I guess
it is too late for the
Thanks, Bob.
I'll probably limited to the 50mm for a while. I considered using my 2X
TC, but the past few times I've used it, I had trouble getting it to
release from the camera body and don't want to risk putting it on there
and ending up damaging the camera trying to get it off there.
Thanks again, Christine!
I happen to be pretty well situated for fabrics, as my mother is one of
those little old ladies who does a lot of sewing -- quilts, blankets,
embroidery, you name it. She's got fabric aplenty I can pretty much
help myself to whenever the need arises.
And thanks
, 2010, at 6:31 AM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Thank you, Christine!
I did the work last night, and some of the shots turned out surprisingly well
for two people who didn't have the foggiest notion what they were doing.
I burned about 150 shots getting the lighting and staging right, but once I
Thanks, Charles!
I'll be sure to keep this in mind in the event I need to throw something
together in a pinch.
-- Walt
On 12/14/2010 4:11 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Dec 14, 2010, at 14:53, Larry Colen wrote:
Here are some of my $3 DiY lightbox:
Just stepping out, so I can't watch it just now. But, I've bookmarked
the page because I'm really looking forward to watching this.
-- Walt
On 12/14/2010 4:05 PM, Cotty wrote:
Hi folks,
Last month I went to Auschwitz and filmed a large school party on a
visit there. Some might be
Ah! OK!
I completely misunderstood your intent, and I apologize for my terse reply.
Best,
Walt
On 12/13/2010 2:46 AM, Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
Just for clarification...I was referring to my photographic skills when I talked
about improvement.
I found them excellent too and far, far away
I wonder if it might not be easier than one might suspect. A few
days ago, I saw a drawing of the Pentax image stabilization system
demonstrating its use of electromagnets on the sensor to achieve it. I
can't help thinking it might be a fairly easy trick for them to use that
field to
That was extremely cool, Larry! Thanks for sharing.
-- Walt
On 12/13/2010 12:25 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
At the end of the video, they say Where books come to life
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBec95Mv8G8
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Hi all,
I have a friend who makes some really nice turquoise jewelry
(http://www.sisdesigns.com/) and she's asked me if I'd like to take a
shot at doing some photographs of her work for catalogs and design
conference submissions. We've already worked on some rudimentary
lighting and
That is unsettling. It's good, of course, that they won't be
destroying your home, but I have to wonder if they might have gotten
into some poisoned bait somewhere.
I know animal control generally only deals with domesticated animals,
pets and such. But, they might be interested in a
You're welcome, Mr. Lahuerta.
Best,
Walt
On 12/12/2010 4:24 PM, Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
Thanks for the link.
Let's take it in a positive way...there's a lot of...room for improvement...
Regards,
Jaume
- Mensaje original
De: Walter Gilbertldott...@gmail.com
Para:
Nice capture, Paul!
The young lady in the background ain't too shabby, either.
-- Walt
On 12/12/2010 2:14 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
It's rare to see a young woman these days who's not either texting or talking
on her cellphone. (That would be sexist if it weren't true. As such it's just
Thanks so much for the wonderfully informative answer, Tanya!
Not only did it tell me everything I need to know, but everything I
wanted to hear. I much prefer to use available light whenever possible,
and I was afraid it was going to turn out that I'd need to use external
flash with a
Great video, Dan.
(I'm still disgruntled about the disappearance of the Jingle Bells
video, BTW.)
-- Walt
On 12/12/2010 7:11 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
http://www.wimp.com/babyhummingbird/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
of photography is learning what the camera will see and how it will differ from what
you see.
Paul
On Dec 12, 2010, at 8:49 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Thanks so much for the wonderfully informative answer, Tanya!
Not only did it tell me everything I need to know, but everything I wanted
It's events like these that make me wish I lived closer to a
metropolitan area. Of course, there are other events that make me glad
I don't, but I digress.
I enjoyed the whole series, but something about 3984
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/5251197730/ stands out to
me.
If it's anything like similar protests in the US, I have to wonder how
many of those people are actually affected students as opposed to trust
fund anarchists looking for a thrill.
-- Walt
On 12/11/2010 10:20 AM, Bob W wrote:
Someone sent me this link - some very powerful pics...
I'd read about Gilmour's son -- so ironically fitting. He's the one
guy who least stood to gain or lose, yet he participated in the very
activity that is most likely to cause a backlash leading to a setback
for the movement he purports to support. Being shielded from the
consequences of
It's my understanding that, in the British system, unlike in the US,
the loser of the case is responsible for the legal fees and court costs
of the winner. That would tend to make their system more workable, an d
would almost certainly make them more likely to foot the bill for the
It varies from one state to the next, and from one jurisdiction
(district or circuit level) to the next. In some cases, it's up to the
judge's discretion, and in others, it's the jury's. State courts have a
huge degree of autonomy, even down to the very basis of legal precedent
-- in most
Hi all,
I stumbled across this link the other day looking for something
interesting to post on my Facebook page, and was just struck by some of
the images. There are a few that really stood out to me and I was
hoping someone might be able to tell me how to go about approximating
the
Yikes! Time to bring in the brass monkey.
Supposed to get down to around 10 here in Kentucky for the next couple
of nights, with winds around 20-30mph and gusts up to 45. That's plenty
cold for me. Not sure what that translates to in wind chill, but I'm
pretty sure it's nowhere -20 --
captured. If
you're talking about the rendering, It's a matter of emphasizing midrange and
shadow through exposure a bit on the minus side and consequent deep skin tones
and shadows.
Paul
On Dec 11, 2010, at 10:53 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
I stumbled across this link the other day
hoping after Christmas that'll be less of an issue, though.
-- Walt
On 12/11/2010 10:35 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
On Dec 11, 2010, at 11:30 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Thanks, Paul.
I agree that the true beauty is in the moments captured, but I really love the
rendering as well. Maybe -1
Happy birthday, Ann! As a gift, all I have to offer is your
continued possession of your M-50/1.4.
Hope you like it!
-- Walt
On 12/10/2010 9:15 AM, P N Stenquist wrote:
(Clears throat.)
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you. Happy birthday, dear Ann, happy
birthday to you.
Paul
I rather enjoyed that, Frank!
-- Walt
On 12/10/2010 5:49 AM, frank theriault wrote:
I thought the late day sun behind the site might make for an
interesting silhouette with nice puffy clouds in the background:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2010/12/pouring-cement.html
Hope you enjoy.
Back when I worked as a claims processor for Allstate Insurance, I
got more than a few calls from homeowners -- in tears -- seeking to
claim damages due to raccoon infestation. They can do an AMAZING amount
of damage. So, you might want to thank your lucky stars that this
particular one
Congratulations, Bong!
Now, if they'll just keep lowering their standards, I should hit 200
right around, oh -- 2030, give or take.
-- Walt
On 12/8/2010 7:40 PM, Bong Manayon wrote:
Just made 200 http://www.flickr.com/photos/bongmanayon/5180461525/
Interestingly, it was one of my K-r
Thanks, John. That's the way I see it, too.
On 12/9/2010 8:47 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
My opinion - and that's all it is - is that the softened focus version
is more pleasing to the eye. Makes it easier to focus on the butterfly
itself.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Great idea, Frank!
On 12/8/2010 10:29 PM, frank theriault wrote:
This should be fun:
http://realcanadianhats.blogspot.com/
;-)
I'll be posting my Big Winter Hats on this space from now on. The
title photo is new to the list, but oh so appropriate given the
blog's title, no?
Hope you
PENTAX: One release away from perfection.
On 12/5/2010 3:36 PM, Larry Colen (Droid Mail) wrote:
Last night when someone saw my camera she comented:
Pentax, the poor man's Nikon.
What else could we do with this:
Cannon, for the skilful photographer.
Or how about Pentax 645D, Hasselblad on a
Beautiful shot, Ted! Congratulations!
Was that at Steel Creek?
-- Walt
On 12/9/2010 7:06 PM, Theodore Beilby wrote:
Still can't submit to the PUG for the rejected theme. One accepted and nine
still waiting review.
I guess I should've read the whole post. Heh.
On 12/9/2010 7:21 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Beautiful shot, Ted! Congratulations!
Was that at Steel Creek?
-- Walt
On 12/9/2010 7:06 PM, Theodore Beilby wrote:
Still can't submit to the PUG for the rejected theme. One accepted
Wow! It didn't even get close to nudity or sexual content. I was
comfortable enough with it to post it on my Facebook page, and I'm
relatively prudish when it comes to the content I'll put on it.
Far be it from me to tell YouTube what they can post, but that video
didn't violate their
no protections at all.
On 12/8/2010 11:36 AM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Wow! It didn't even get close to nudity or sexual content. I
was comfortable enough with it to post it on my Facebook page, and
I'm relatively prudish when it comes to the content I'll put on it.
Far be it from me to tell
Hi all,
Well, I've had a couple more images accepted into the Pentax Photo
Gallery, making it a grand total of eight, and thought I'd share with
the group. The two most recent are the ostrich (Maybelline) and the
fawn (Trepidation).
I still have one more shot pending, though I'm not
I would really love to attend, though it depends on my fortunes over
the course of the next few months. If things take a drastic turn, count
me in. If things stay the same, it'll be a long shot. If one more
domino falls -- well, *maybe* I'll be able to attend the 20th
anniversary
Thank you, Jack!
Glad you enjoyed it. :-)
-- Walt
On 12/8/2010 12:28 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Just took a very pleasing look. Excellent, Walt.
Jack
--- On Wed, 12/8/10, Walter Gilbertldott...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Walter Gilbertldott...@gmail.com
Subject: More Additions to the Pentax
Thank you very much, Dan!
Having a mimosa tree in the front yard does have its benefits. They
really provide a nice backdrop when they're in bloom. And, if you catch
the butterflies early in the season, before they get all beaten up and
start losing pieces of their wings, they make
Hi all,
Here's another butterfly shot I'm considering submitting to the PPG and
thought I'd get some opinions on beforehand. I'm just a tad iffy on
it, as it just doesn't strike me as particularly vivid -- something I'm
partial to in my butterfly images. Of course, it's a matter of taste
Oops ... forgot the deets:
K-x, Asahi Takumar 135/2.5, ISO 200, 1/320, Aperture priority, unknown
aperture setting.
On 12/8/2010 1:38 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
Here's another butterfly shot I'm considering submitting to the PPG
and thought I'd get some opinions on beforehand
201 - 300 of 866 matches
Mail list logo
