I have a good K5. Excellent high ISO. Autofocus was as good as my K7. Grace
uses the K7 now. (She graduated from 8th grade today!)
Paul
> On Jun 1, 2018, at 4:47 PM, Bill wrote:
>
>> On 6/1/2018 11:46 AM, Alan C wrote:
>> I used a K7 for about 4 years. I shot mostly in bright light. Good up
On 6/1/2018 11:46 AM, Alan C wrote:
I used a K7 for about 4 years. I shot mostly in bright light. Good up to
ISO 400, tolerable at 800, hopeless beyond. (About the same as my
K110D!) Now I have a K5 which is OK even at 3200. Everything else seems
much the same as the K7. No electronic
On 6/1/2018 1:26 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
is the video any good on the K7? Im looking for an inexpensive backup body
that has video too and the K7s sure are cheap now. 720P is OK its for
web postings.
Pentax has always taken it up the bum for having crappy video. It's
always been OK for me,
is the video any good on the K7? Im looking for an inexpensive backup body
that has video too and the K7s sure are cheap now. 720P is OK its for web
postings.
jco
On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 13:46:11 -0400, Alan C wrote:
I used a K7 for about 4 years. I shot mostly in bright light. Good up to
I used a K7 for about 4 years. I shot mostly in bright light. Good up to
ISO 400, tolerable at 800, hopeless beyond. (About the same as my
K110D!) Now I have a K5 which is OK even at 3200. Everything else seems
much the same as the K7. No electronic problems. Can't imagine why your
AF was so
On 6/1/2018 10:42 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Nice to know my kipping it was a good move.
Thanks, Bill!
I was shooting a lot of studio at the time, so the K7 was very good for
me. It ended up being a far better camera than the K5 in my hands as I
got a Friday afternoon K5 that had pretty much
Nice to know my kipping it was a good move.
Thanks, Bill!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 1, 2018, at 9:34 AM, Bill wrote:
>
>> On 6/1/2018 10:16 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>> OK, so I forgot about the K7..which I
>> resisted.
>
> To me, it had the best colour of any Pentax DSLR, but it was really
At 11:23 AM 6/1/2018, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
Do all Pentax Dslrs have some means of using AA batteries?
The K-70 does not - it can use only the Pentax D-LI109 7.4 volt
lithium ion battery. I have seen no external supply options for the
K-70, and none are shown on the Ricoh site.
Do all
On 6/1/2018 10:16 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
OK, so I forgot about the K7..which I
resisted.
To me, it had the best colour of any Pentax DSLR, but it was really only
good at base ISO. It used an updated from the K20 Samsung sensor. Great
at base ISO, but it went to hell in a hurry as the ISO was
OK, so I forgot about the K7..which I
resisted.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 1, 2018, at 8:38 AM, Bill wrote:
>
>> On 6/1/2018 9:23 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
>> what was the last top of the line Pentax DSLR before the K-5 series?
>
> K20D, then the K7, then the K5.
>
>> Do all Pentax Dslrs
On 6/1/2018 9:23 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
what was the last top of the line Pentax DSLR before the K-5 series?
K20D, then the K7, then the K5.
Do all Pentax Dslrs have some means of using AA batteries?
Yes, but you have to buy the external battery grip and be prepared for
really crappy
K20D ?
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 1, 2018, at 8:23 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
>
> what was the last top of the line Pentax DSLR before the K-5 series?
>
> Do all Pentax Dslrs have some means of using AA batteries?
>
> Do all pentax Dslrs have interchangable focus screens?
> --
> J.C.
The Pentax Photo Gallery is back online, and appears to be functioning
normally. Both Bong and I have been able to log in and access the images.
The approval process is now almost 7 months behind. I don't think that is
explained by a smaller pool of voters, because the pool of submitters would
I'm getting a time-out as well. I think I last checked in late April when it
was working OK.
I wouldn't be surprised if Ricoh is getting ready to pull the plug - they lost
interest in it years ago and, I think, many users have too. I last submitted
images in 2016 when it look 6-8 weeks for
At 01:23 PM 5/20/2018, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>Rally?
>
>Curious indeed.
The forums user gallery is still there but for the main gallery pings fail.
Dale H. Cook, 50+ years as an SLR photographer,
Pentax K-70 w/ Pentax-DA 18-270mm lens, using
colored filters for B gravestone photography
Hm.
Been several years since I logged on. Tried to connect by various means,
and had some online tools look for the server by its IP address, but to
no avail. Nothing wrong with the address space, queries to the server
are routed through the traffic junctions one would expect. I think it's
When I try, the connections "times out" after a while.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Bulent Celasun
wrote:
> I have tried now.
>
> Waiting... Waiting... No response. No error codes...
>
> Bulent
>
I have tried now.
Waiting... Waiting... No response. No error codes...
Bulent
-
http://patoloji.gen.tr
http://celasun.wordpress.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/
http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822
Rally?
Curious indeed.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 1:01 PM, wrote:
>
>
> Well I don't. Connects just fine.
>
> Alan C
>
> On 2018-05-20 18:04, Subash Jeyan wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 20 May 2018 09:06:09 -0400
> > "Daniel J.
Well I don't. Connects just fine.
Alan C
On 2018-05-20 18:04, Subash Jeyan wrote:
> On Sun, 20 May 2018 09:06:09 -0400
> "Daniel J. Matyola" wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know what is happning with the PPG? Has Ricoh finally killed it?
>> I haven't be able to access it
On Sun, 20 May 2018 09:06:09 -0400
"Daniel J. Matyola" wrote:
> Does anyone know what is happning with the PPG? Has Ricoh finally
> killed it? I haven't be able to access it ice May 15.
since you pointed it out, i tried to connect to the site but i get an
connection time
Since the 15th? I thought it was one of those days. So is this the end?
Bong
Bong Manayon http://bong.manayon.net
On Sunday, May 20, 2018, 10:03:56 PM GMT+8, wrote:
I loaded a couple of images in the Nature section on Friday.
Alan C
On 2018-05-20 15:06, Daniel
I loaded a couple of images in the Nature section on Friday.
Alan C
On 2018-05-20 15:06, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> Does anyone know what is happning with the PPG? Has Ricoh finally killed
> it? I haven't be able to access it ice May 15.
>
> Dan Matyola
>
What, Ricoh has hired a marketing staff to sell Pentax, why, why,
that's... Blasphemy!
On 5/11/2018 12:39 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Also, Ricoh has a full page add on the back cover of the latest Outdoor
Photographer magazine.
-Original Message-
From: Gonz
Also, Ricoh has a full page add on the back cover of the latest Outdoor
Photographer magazine.
-Original Message-
>From: Gonz Subject: Pentax spotted
>
>https://fstoppers.com/business/are-you-pricing-your-photography-services-correctly-248648
>
>
>--
>--
I've read Bob's answers, understanding isn't the problem...
On 4/27/2018 3:32 PM, John wrote:
On 4/26/2018 16:10, Bob W-PDML wrote:
You can ask me anything.
You might even understand the answer.
--
America wasn't founded so that we could all be better.
America was founded so we could
On 4/26/2018 16:10, Bob W-PDML wrote:
You can ask me anything.
You might even understand the answer.
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I wondered why mine doesn't.
Thanks, Bill! :-)
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 27, 2018, at 11:58 AM, Bill wrote:
>
>> On 4/27/2018 12:17 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
>>> You can ask me
Bill wrote:
>On 4/27/2018 12:17 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
>>> You can ask me anything.
>>
>> Why is there air.??
>
>You can't have stinky farts without it.
Well you *can*, technically, but you can't light 'em on fire
On 4/27/2018 12:17 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
You can ask me anything.
Why is there air.??
You can't have stinky farts without it.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
> On 27 Apr 2018, at 19:19, David J Brooks wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
>> You can ask me anything.
>
> Why is there air.??
>
Because otherwise there could be no AirB, and then where would we be?
--
PDML
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
> You can ask me anything.
Why is there air.??
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I have a manual and I can ask.
My problem is that I can not ask if I do not know the right question.
I use my K1 as an advanced user, but there are probably things that I
don't know, but would like to know
The manual is not for comfortable reading, a well written book could be
helpful.
On 27 Apr 2018, at 02:38, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> They can , but will you answer?
>
> Hotspur
I'm answering now, n'est-ce pas?
Tottenham
>
>> On 4/26/2018 4:10 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
>> You can ask me anything.
>>
On 26 Apr 2018, at 21:02, Bill
They can , but will you answer?
Hotspur
On 4/26/2018 4:10 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
You can ask me anything.
On 26 Apr 2018, at 21:02, Bill wrote:
On 4/26/2018 1:11 PM, Jos de Fotograaf wrote:
Is the *Pentax K-1 e-book by Yvon Bourque worth buying?
Greetz, Jos
*
In my humble opinion, no. It says little if anything that is not already in the
manual. I opened it, spent 5-10 minutes doing a quick glance through it,
decided to just move on and not bemoan the money wasted.
I don’t recall the details, but I vaguely remember also seeing comments that
were
You can ask me anything.
> On 26 Apr 2018, at 21:02, Bill wrote:
>
>> On 4/26/2018 1:11 PM, Jos de Fotograaf wrote:
>> Is the *Pentax K-1 e-book by Yvon Bourque worth buying?
>> Greetz, Jos
>> *
> Do you have an owners manual?
> They come with the camera.
> Or they
On 4/26/2018 1:11 PM, Jos de Fotograaf wrote:
Is the *Pentax K-1 e-book by Yvon Bourque worth buying?
Greetz, Jos
*
Do you have an owners manual?
They come with the camera.
Or they can be downloaded from the Ricoh website.
For everything else, just ask Bob W.
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Sorry, Erc. Guess I missed your
K3ii comment.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 9, 2018, at 1:22 PM, l...@red4est.com wrote:
>
> As I said, the shutter burst rate on it is excellent
>
>> On April 9, 2018 11:46:14 AM PDT, Jack Davis wrote:
>> Your understanding of my post
You must be reading it all on your
phone.(?)
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 9, 2018, at 4:03 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
>
> Jack Davis wrote:
>> I don't do my own indenting. The
>> system makes those choices.
>
> Exactly. Some mail clients are braindead and don't show
Jack Davis wrote:
I don't do my own indenting. The
system makes those choices.
Exactly. Some mail clients are braindead and don't show the proper
chain of replies when people follow the 30-40 year standard of inline
replies to the content rather than top-posting.
That has caused me
Jack Davis wrote:
I disabled "Distortion Correction."
a couple or three days ago.
Is that what your referencing, Larry?
Yes. That was what was causing me lots of problems.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I don't do my own indenting. The
system makes those choices.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 9, 2018, at 3:04 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> Sorry about that. Your attribution indents seem a bit weird, I wonder if you
> actually saw my interspersed comments.
>
> In any case
I disabled "Distortion Correction."
a couple or three days ago.
Is that what your referencing, Larry?
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 9, 2018, at 3:04 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> Sorry about that. Your attribution indents seem a bit weird, I wonder if you
> actually saw my
Sorry about that. Your attribution indents seem a bit weird, I wonder
if you actually saw my interspersed comments.
In any case the way I phrased it, now that I'm back at a real keyboard,
is that the K3-II makes the K1 frame rate seem sluggish. In many ways
it is much better for action. Do
Already tried that, P.J., but thanks!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 9, 2018, at 1:32 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>
> Try setting the lens to manual focus and see that makes a difference.
>
>
>> On 4/9/2018 4:23 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>> Thanks, Mathew!
>> AFS setting
Try setting the lens to manual focus and see that makes a difference.
On 4/9/2018 4:23 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Thanks, Mathew!
AFS setting is Shutter Priority.
In this setting the focus is set in
the first frame and does not change
to follow the target even to hold
focus. Only to be used for a
Guess I lost you "somewhere
between "I have a K3, but am
curious about the frame rate of
a K3ll."
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 9, 2018, at 1:22 PM, l...@red4est.com wrote:
>
> As I said, the shutter burst rate on it is excellent
>
>> On April 9, 2018 11:46:14 AM PDT, Jack Davis
Thanks, Mathew!
AFS setting is Shutter Priority.
In this setting the focus is set in
the first frame and does not change
to follow the target even to hold
focus. Only to be used for a stationary target. It is stated in the
specs to fire at a rate of 8.3 frames
per second due to it's firing in
As I said, the shutter burst rate on it is excellent
On April 9, 2018 11:46:14 AM PDT, Jack Davis wrote:
>Your understanding of my post is
>likely misunderstood due to my
>age.
>I do not have a K3ll, my intent was
>to glean an opinion or two about it's
>shutter's burst
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 9, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
> I don't have a K3ll. I do have a K3.
> J
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:08 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
>>
>> Is it possible that a camera setting is the problem?
>>
I don't have a K3ll. I do have a K3.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:08 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
>
> Is it possible that a camera setting is the problem?
>
> The default setting for "Action in AF.C Continuous" (C3.17 in the menu
> system) is "Focus priority". That
Is it possible that a camera setting is the problem?
The default setting for "Action in AF.C Continuous" (C3.17 in the menu
system) is "Focus priority". That means the camera will prioritize getting
the shot in focus, rather than shooting at the fastest rate. It might seem
erratic or slow. You
That could be it, P. J. Good call!
Am still waiting for an opinion re
the "H" shutter speed(?)
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 9, 2018, at 11:58 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>
> I think that the reason the K3 sells for more than the K3II is the pop up
> flash. It can
I think that the reason the K3 sells for more than the K3II is the pop
up flash. It can be very convenient, and while GPS which replaces it
would be very useful in a number of applications, it really isn't that
important in most shooting situations, whereas when you need a little
extra light,
Your understanding of my post is
likely misunderstood due to my
age.
I do not have a K3ll, my intent was
to glean an opinion or two about it's
shutter's burst rate capability.
Appreciate your effort Larry!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 9, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Larry Colen
Jack Davis wrote:
Anyone using the Pentax K3ll? Have you used "H" burst rate setting in AFC? If
so, what do you think of the
frame rate. Sluggish and irregular or aggressive and crisp?
I've got a K3II which I tend to use for long focal length work. I used
it a lot for photographing
I know. But it amused me to see it.
On 3/17/2018 22:22, Rick Womer wrote:
The medical optics division was the only part of Pentax that Asahi didn’t
sell off several years ago. Alas, name and ancestry are the only common
elements your camera and the medical equipment share.
Rick
On Fri, Mar
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 8:23 PM Rick Womer wrote:
> The medical optics division was the only part of Pentax that Asahi didn’t
> sell off several years ago. Alas, name and ancestry are the only common
> elements your camera and the medical equipment share.
When Hoya bought
The medical optics division was the only part of Pentax that Asahi didn’t
sell off several years ago. Alas, name and ancestry are the only common
elements your camera and the medical equipment share.
Rick
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 21:49 John wrote:
> I had a doctor's
> On 19 January 2018 at 14:40 Chris Mitchell wrote:
>
>
> On 17 January 2018 at 17:40, Bob W-PDML wrote:
> Mostly everything's fine. It's just, well, it's just that, sometimes Chris
> M's barbecues can be a bit, shall we say, special...
> >
> >
>
On 17 January 2018 at 17:40, Bob W-PDML wrote:
Mostly everything's fine. It's just, well, it's just that, sometimes Chris
M's barbecues can be a bit, shall we say, special...
>
>
> https://youtu.be/4M3FrHsiSfE
>
>
> The next UK PDML will have to be in Royston Vasey then. I's
Mostly everything's fine. It's just, well, it's just that, sometimes Chris M's
barbecues can be a bit, shall we say, special...
https://youtu.be/4M3FrHsiSfE
On 17 Jan 2018, at 12:11, John
> wrote:
I'll try to keep that in mind next time
I'll try to keep that in mind next time someone proposes a PDML meet-up.
On 1/17/2018 02:43, Bob W-PDML wrote:
Pentax seems to be the go-to brand for psychopathic killers.
On 17 Jan 2018, at 07:31, John wrote:
On 1/16/2018 21:00, Mark Roberts wrote:
ann sanfedele
Pentax seems to be the go-to brand for psychopathic killers.
> On 17 Jan 2018, at 07:31, John wrote:
>
>> On 1/16/2018 21:00, Mark Roberts wrote:
>> ann sanfedele wrote:
>>> Just turned on my PBS channel as I've been watching "Murder iN Suburbia"
>>> and it is about to
On 1/16/2018 21:00, Mark Roberts wrote:
ann sanfedele wrote:
Just turned on my PBS channel as I've been watching "Murder iN Suburbia"
and it is about to start.
The show is called The Syndicate. with about ten minutes to go in the
episode (original airdate 04/03/12)
I see the camera on a
ann sanfedele wrote:
>Just turned on my PBS channel as I've been watching "Murder iN Suburbia"
>and it is about to start.
>The show is called The Syndicate. with about ten minutes to go in the
>episode (original airdate 04/03/12)
>I see the camera on a tripod and the photog struggling with the
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 12:28:43PM -0600, PhotoCapturesbyJeffery.com wrote:
> Okay let me try this from my regular Facebook instead of my photography page
>
> https://www.facebook.com/jeffery.t.johnson.7/posts/1985563248126674
>
> I have the post public so maybe it will allow viewing of it
We had been wondering where Knarf was!
ann
On 12/8/2017 4:44 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
On 08 December 2017 at 18:28 "PhotoCapturesbyJeffery.com"
wrote:
Okay let me try this from my regular Facebook instead of my
photography
mike wilson wrote:
On 08 December 2017 at 18:28 "PhotoCapturesbyJeffery.com"
wrote:
Okay let me try this from my regular Facebook instead of my photography page
https://www.facebook.com/jeffery.t.johnson.7/posts/1985563248126674
I have the post
> On 08 December 2017 at 18:28 "PhotoCapturesbyJeffery.com"
> wrote:
>
>
> Okay let me try this from my regular Facebook instead of my photography page
>
> https://www.facebook.com/jeffery.t.johnson.7/posts/1985563248126674
>
> I have the post public
Okay let me try this from my regular Facebook instead of my photography page
https://www.facebook.com/jeffery.t.johnson.7/posts/1985563248126674
I have the post public so maybe it will allow viewing of it without
having to be logged into Facebook.
Jeffery Johnson
Saw it for just a few
On 12/7/2017 18:06, PhotoCapturesbyJeffery.com wrote:
Here is something to brighten your evening, night, morning
https://www.facebook.com/PhotoCapturesbyJeffery/posts/1499730210096658
Do let me know if you were able to view it.
Saw it for just a few seconds before a Facebook pop-up that
Not Sure John if it is limited lens or not :-)
Jeffery Johnson | Photo Captures by Jeffery
http://www.PhotoCapturesbyJeffery.com
/Diverse range of photography Artistic - Animals - Events/Festivals -
Transportation - Pets - Nature - Scenic - Cityscape. That you can
purchase as framed or
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 05:06:35PM -0600, PhotoCapturesbyJeffery.com wrote:
> Here is something to brighten your evening, night, morning
>
> https://www.facebook.com/PhotoCapturesbyJeffery/posts/1499730210096658
Is that a Limited lens that bunny has there?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I don't think there's much difference between waterproofness in
"inexpensive" cameras Pentax/Ricoh vs Olympus. The build quality will
probably be about the same. The only actual underwater camera that I
would trust implicitly is the Nikon AW1. Then again it's almost $1000
for the two lens
Pentax used to have a whole line of these, but it looks like Ricoh has
rebranded them as Ricoh and limited selection to just one model in two
colors.
https://us.ricoh-imaging.com/index.php/cameras/wg-50
JIS Level 8 seals good to 14 meters.
There's a review from shutterbug here.
Thanks you Mark< Paul, Mike Stan and John for your comments and advice.
Thanks, Stan, for the offer, but I don't think I would give a friend a
used camera. I'm old-fashioned about things like that.
What is the current model?
How much better is the WG-5 than the WG-3?
Dan Matyola
On 12/4/2017 12:13, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Thanks, Godfrey.
I was actually looking at the TG-5, but I would prefer to buy a Pentax if
they offer a similar product.
Pentax Optio WG-3 or Ricoh WG-30w
https://www.amazon.com/Pentax-WG-3-orange-Waterproof-Digital/dp/B00B728M7S/
I have the WG-3 and WG-5. Haven’t used either much underwater, but then I
haven’t been underwater that much.
If you would like to buy the WG-3 for your friend to evaluate (whatever is a
fair price) let me know. The newer models look & act pretty much the same,
though with a deeper underwater
Would that be any more of a problem with the Pentax compared with the
Olympus?
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:45 PM, mike wilson wrote:
> > On 04 December 2017 at 16:48 "Daniel J. Matyola"
>
> On 04 December 2017 at 16:48 "Daniel J. Matyola" wrote:
>
>
> I am looking to buy a friend a waterproof camera for water sports,
> including surfing, kayaking and snorkeling. Should be able to stay
> watertight at least 30 feet (10 m) below the surface, but not for
The WG series pretty much fits the bill. The latest, I believe it is the WG 50.
I recommended an earlier WG to my ex-wife, and even she likes it.
https://us.ricoh-imaging.com/index.php/cameras/wg-50
-p
On Dec 4, 2017, 11:24 AM -0600, Mark Roberts ,
wrote:
> Daniel
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>I am looking to buy a friend a waterproof camera for water sports,
>including surfing, kayaking and snorkeling. Should be able to stay
>watertight at least 30 feet (10 m) below the surface, but not for heavy
>duty scuba diving.
>
>Is there a Pentax point and shoot that
Thanks, Godfrey.
I was actually looking at the TG-5, but I would prefer to buy a Pentax if
they offer a similar product.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> I don't know of any from Pentax. The
I don't know of any from Pentax. The Olympus TG-5 seems to be the most highly
praised of point and shoot type cameras in this category.
G
—
No matter where you go, there you are.
> On Dec 4, 2017, at 8:48 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> I am looking to buy a friend a
don't really
> know what they have.
>
> Alan C
If it isn't wrong in some way, you'll be able to hear me kicking myself wherever
you are in the world.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Colen
> Sent: 4 December, 2017 4:52 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I was given my 67, the question is what lenses does it have, and what would
shopping cost.
On December 3, 2017 7:19:00 PM PST, "P. J. Alling"
wrote:
>Actually $150.00 might be about right. KEH doesn't have a 6x7 or 62 in
>
>stock now but they do have a 645, for
2017 4:52 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax 6x7 for sale
Alan C wrote:
This is very cheap (R2000 = $150) + courier costs. Perhaps someone is
interested?
https://www.gumtree.co.za/a-other-sports-leisure-items/eastern-pretoria/pentax-asahi-6x7-medium-format
Actually $150.00 might be about right. KEH doesn't have a 6x7 or 62 in
stock now but they do have a 645, for which they want $149.99. Sadly if
it's not a recent digital camera or a particularly collectable item,
older cameras aren't worth very much money in the modern world. Film
cameras
Alan C wrote:
This is very cheap (R2000 = $150) + courier costs. Perhaps someone is
interested?
https://www.gumtree.co.za/a-other-sports-leisure-items/eastern-pretoria/pentax-asahi-6x7-medium-format-set/1002169468430910837992609
If it's not a scam, I'm far more interested than I really
mike wilson wrote:
>> On 03 December 2017 at 21:06 Mark Roberts wrote:
>>
>>
>> Alan C wrote:
>>
>> >This is very cheap (R2000 = $150) + courier costs. Perhaps someone is
>> >interested?
>> >
>>
> On 03 December 2017 at 21:06 Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>
> Alan C wrote:
>
> >This is very cheap (R2000 = $150) + courier costs. Perhaps someone is
> >interested?
> >
>
Alan C wrote:
>This is very cheap (R2000 = $150) + courier costs. Perhaps someone is
>interested?
>
>https://www.gumtree.co.za/a-other-sports-leisure-items/eastern-pretoria/pentax-asahi-6x7-medium-format-set/1002169468430910837992609
That's the later Pentax 67, not the 6x7. So it's an even
Thanks. That is cumbersome, if one has as many image on the gallery as do
I, but it works.
Dan
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Brian Walters
wrote:
> There's probably an easier way, but in Firefox select
It still exists.
For whatever reason, I still submit images and vote on submissions. A few
other PDMLers post there every now and then, but the only familiar name I
see regularly among the recent additions is Bong Manayon. His images are a
sublime as ever.
Dan Matyola
WOW, hadn't thought about that
gallery in many years. Haven't a
clue if it even still exists.??
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 8, 2017, at 11:56 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> Can anyone remind me of how one can obtain a link to an individual image in
> the Pentax
There's probably an easier way, but in Firefox select Tools > Page Info > Media
tab and then scroll down to the image you want and then copy the highlighted
address.
There's probably something similar in other browsers.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western
You wouldn't say that if you were carrying one of these, the heavy duty
model weighs 44 lbs without the head...
http://www.moogs3.com/products/tripods/gibraltar.html
On 5/15/2017 1:53 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
Tripods are for wimps. ;)
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Mark Roberts
David J Brooks wrote:
>On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Mark Roberts
> wrote:
>> Zos Xavius wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Mark Roberts
>>> wrote:
A few days ago when I was crossing the Milennium Bridge in London I
501 - 600 of 17330 matches
Mail list logo