I'd guess that
shifting one of the settings would bias the automatic selection to
a setting that was one or more steps above or below whatever the
camera decided was the optimum value, while changing that setting
would override the automatic algorithms and select an explicit value.
--
%(real_name)s Penta
On 3/10/2023 1:10 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
P 104 of the manual is discussing the E-dial, and it makes a distinction
between changing T, A or ISO, versus shifting them. I don't understand the
difference.
Usually, changing is a direct input whereas shifting is an indirect
input, so for example,
P 104 of the manual is discussing the E-dial, and it makes a distinction
between changing T, A or ISO, versus shifting them. I don't understand the
difference.
--
Larry Colen
l...@red4est.com. sent from Mirkwood
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to
>> I’ll also occasionally play with the sel-9 autofocus mode.
>>
>> I realize that different types of photography take different techniques.
>> With static scenes I can fiddle and frotz until I get something that seems
>> to work, but when photographing bir
I’ll also
> occasionally play with the sel-9 autofocus mode.
>
> I realize that different types of photography take different techniques.
> With static scenes I can fiddle and frotz until I get something that seems to
> work, but when photographing birds, either in trees or on the w
hniques.
> With static scenes I can fiddle and frotz until I get something that seems to
> work, but when photographing birds, either in trees or on the wing, I really
> need some techniques and settings that at least improve my odds of getting a
> shot in focus.
>
> W
When I had the Pentax *ist DS and K10D bodies, I replaced the poor quality
standard focusing screens with ones that worked well. This is actually the
exact same thing I did with focusing screens in some of my SLR camera bodies
from 20-50 years ago.
In fact, I was finding that focusing my
When I had the Pentax *ist DS and K10D bodies, I replaced the poor quality
standard focusing screens with ones that worked well. This is actually the
exact same thing I did with focusing screens in some of my SLR camera bodies
from 20-50 years ago.
In fact, I was finding that focusing my
In the case of when I cannot see well enough to focus, I just set a distance by
scale and get perfect focus. Of course, this doesn't work if you have lenses
that have no focusing scale, but I tend to avoid lenses like that.
G
> On Feb 25, 2021, at 1:14 PM, John wrote:
>
> Unless you're half
This is pretty much what I’ve been doing, but I don’t like to assume that just
because something seems to work for me that it is the best way.
I have learned that stock focusing screens in 2020 don’t work nearly as well
for manual focus as focusing screens did 20-40 years ago. Unfortunately,
wrote:
What settings do you use in which situations?
--
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
atic scenes I can fiddle and frotz until I get something that seems to
work, but when photographing birds, either in trees or on the wing, I really
need some techniques and settings that at least improve my odds of getting a
shot in focus.
What settings do you use in which situations?
-- Larry Col
Ditto what Alan wrote.
Rick
> On Feb 25, 2021, at 2:55 AM, Alan C wrote:
>
> I mostly use auto focus, single point, spot. Works fine for me. M focus
> occasionally if I am trying to thread the sensor through the undergrowth.
> K110D, K7 & K5 all the same.
>
> Alan C
>
> On 25-Feb-21 07:59
On Feb 24, 2021, at 9:59 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>> On Feb 24, 2021, at 9:54 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>> I just turn AF off and focus manually. Much faster and simpler. :)
>
> Depends on which Pentax body. Like I said, with my K100, K2 & Kx that was
> true. I forget which one you’re
I just turn AF off and focus manually. Much faster and simpler. :)
—
G
—
Godfrey DiGiorgi - godfreydigio...@me.com - 408-431-4601
> On Feb 24, 2021, at 7:26 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> What settings do you use in which situations?
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubsc
mode.
I realize that different types of photography take different techniques. With
static scenes I can fiddle and frotz until I get something that seems to work,
but when photographing birds, either in trees or on the wing, I really need
some techniques and settings that at least improve my odds
I've taken the autofocus away from the trigger button, put it on the AF
button and set it to spot in the center of the frame.
So, I take the detail that I want to focus on into the centre, shortly
hit the AF button with my thumb and then shoot when the moment is right.
Works fine for me.
Ralf
I mostly use auto focus, single point, spot. Works fine for me. M focus
occasionally if I am trying to thread the sensor through the
undergrowth. K110D, K7 & K5 all the same.
Alan C
On 25-Feb-21 07:59 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Feb 24, 2021, at 9:54 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I just turn
erent types of photography take different techniques.
> With static scenes I can fiddle and frotz until I get something that seems to
> work, but when photographing birds, either in trees or on the wing, I really
> need some techniques and settings that at least improve my odds of g
on an eye, with further settings for nearest, furthest
and somewhere in between, I guess. If your pentaxes have something like that it
would probably with your microphone problem. More recent Olympoi than mine also
have a bird recognition capability and focus on the bird’s eye.
In general I use AF-S
> On Feb 24, 2021, at 9:54 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> I just turn AF off and focus manually. Much faster and simpler. :)
Depends on which Pentax body. Like I said, with my K100, K2 & Kx that was
true. I forget which one you’re using these days? You seem to change your
cameras more
and frotz until I get something that seems to work,
but when photographing birds, either in trees or on the wing, I really need
some techniques and settings that at least improve my odds of getting a shot in
focus.
What settings do you use in which situations?
--
Larry Colen
l...@red4est.com
Quoting Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com:
I see it! Thank you, P.J. It's actually a tiny rectangle with four
miniature arrows in it. Just below the MF/AF indicator.
Well now - how about that?!! It's the same on the K-5 - never knew
about it before.
I wonder what else I've missed.
Ann, I've come to this way late, but
must offer white balance as the
possible problem. It's gotten me
in a color dilemma a couple times.
Actually hard to admit..blush ;-/
Jack
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 15, 2015, at 8:50 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
Top shows info for a photo
Simple minds tend to inadvertently over simply, but are the settings specific
to the displayed images?
Shake your head, roll your eyes and ignore my base query, Ann. I would in your
place. :-)))
Will be watching for the answer.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele ann
Ann, I'll describe what has happened to me a couple of times and this
might explain how you got into a funny colour space.
I mainly use the 4-way arrows to move the AF point around. I use them
that way much more than I use the menu options (Drive, WB, Flash,
etc.), so I leave the 4-way mode in AF
That could happen another way as well. I often carry three small lenses
the FA 43mm, A 24, and M 85. I often change focus points with the 43,
neither of the other two allow that but the camera helpfully puts the
four way into menu mode when I switch to one of them. I also use the FA
43 in
Describes my point exactly!
I have a particularly coveted hawk
Image that continuously reminds me
of what it could have been had I been
less panicked in setting control while
shooting. I've come to expect a huge
DUH factor.
Jack
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 16, 2015, at 8:26 AM, Bruce Walker
The settings that were wrong showed up when I looked at the complete
info with images going back several days I just scrolled backwards
in the view until I came to a photo that was correct - I could pin point
the occasion where I messed up.. It was in the restaurant whre my show
Bruce I do shoot RAW - but that made me lazy in getting down more
quickly to what was causing the problem --
I think I must have accidentally hit the menu button as you had done for
starters..
ann
On 4/16/2015 11:26, Bruce Walker wrote:
Ann, I'll describe what has happened to me a couple
I'll add that my settings review now starts with my being certain the left icon
on the 4-way controller shows AWB.
Even though shot in RAW, each time I come across that hawk image I still feel a
wince of disappointment.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis jdavi...@comcast.net
Does anyone know if there's an annunciator -- icon, indicator,
whathaveyou -- that will tell me at a glance what mode the 4-way
control is in? All I can do now is experimentally poke a button and
see what happens, then if it's wrong press the mode switch button and
try again to verify. If it's
On 4/16/2015 15:56, Jack Davis wrote:
On the K-5, switching on the monitor INFO display is one fairly quick way to
review settings/modes.
Jack
Yeah- which is how I found the mistake :-)
ann
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
Isn't there a part in the menu that lets you rest to factory default ?
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
Subject: Re: Help! problem with K-5 settings...
Ok
I found how to change that stuff
Gather you're referring to the K-5. K-3 indicates the AF mode by size and color
coding the various settings.
I'll check the K-5. Haven't held it for awhile.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday
wrote:
Gather you're referring to the K-5. K-3 indicates the AF mode by size and
color coding the various settings.
I'll check the K-5. Haven't held it for awhile.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent
settings... GOT IT -
Jack, not the AF Mode, but rather which mode the 4-way controller
buttons are in, where one mode is push the AF point around and the
other is to select WB, Drive, Flash and colour spaces and processing.
And I mean on the K-3.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Jack Davis jdavi
Just a SWAG, but the settings appear to show those that were in effect
at the time the image was taken, and are those applied to that image.
According to the manual (page 222) you set Image finishing tone and
Custom image parameters before shooting. It doesn't look like you can
change them
On the K-5, switching on the monitor INFO display is one fairly quick way to
review settings/modes.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 10:37:32 AM
Subject: Re: Help! problem with K
In the viewfinder display there's a checkerboard pattern Ikon that
lights up if the the four way controller is in af point mode. It's easy
to ignore.
On 4/16/2015 1:37 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Does anyone know if there's an annunciator -- icon, indicator,
whathaveyou -- that will tell me at a
I see it! Thank you, P.J. It's actually a tiny rectangle with four
miniature arrows in it. Just below the MF/AF indicator.
And it was _extremely_ easy to ignore. I guess if I'd really paid
attention to the manual instead of burying it under a year's worth of
VISA statements and empty kitty
When you wrote arrows, my first thought was Maybe they changed it in
the K-5II since I think you're using the K-5, so I looked closer and
damn they are little arrows...
On 4/16/2015 7:22 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
I see it! Thank you, P.J. It's actually a tiny rectangle with four
miniature
to change the
tone (where It should say +- it says -- or a color...)
and when I shoot the color os off. :-(
ann
On 4/16/2015 01:01, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
But what I want to do is unset it - I still don't see where to do that
on the camera..
What did I press by accident to change those settings
Top shows info for a photo where the color is totally off
bottom shows a photo that had correct color.
I don't understand the iconography, for one thing... Pretty sure
I simply pressed some levers or buttons at some point and that
caused the problem -
can't figure it out from the menu or the
that
on the camera..
What did I press by accident to change those settings that i didn't even
know existed?
On 4/16/2015 00:04, Philip Northeast wrote:
Its on page 222 setting the image finishing tone
Philip Northeast
www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
On 16/04/2015 1:50 pm, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Top shows
But what I want to do is unset it - I still don't see where to do that
on the camera..
What did I press by accident to change those settings that i didn't even
know existed?
On 4/16/2015 00:04, Philip Northeast wrote:
Its on page 222 setting the image finishing tone
Philip Northeast
Or maybe 267 Applying the Digital Filter.
stan
On Apr 16, 2015, at 12:04 AM, Philip Northeast rnort...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
Its on page 222 setting the image finishing tone
Philip Northeast
www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
On 16/04/2015 1:50 pm, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Top shows info for
Its on page 222 setting the image finishing tone
Philip Northeast
www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
On 16/04/2015 1:50 pm, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Top shows info for a photo where the color is totally off
bottom shows a photo that had correct color.
I don't understand the iconography, for one
Can we change our digest settings via e-mail to the list server? What are the
commands?
Kevin
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
I think you can go to http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
and change the settings there, but you may have to wait until Nov 1,
as we have exceeded our bandwidth limitation for the month on
pdml.net.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 7
Yea. That's why I'm asking for an alternate method.
Kevin Thornsberry
On Oct 27, 2014, at 7:00 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
I think you can go to http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
and change the settings there, but you may have to wait until Nov 1,
as we have
to pdml-requ...@pdml.net
FROM the email address you are registered at pdml with
(I tried from my home account and got nothing back)
You may want to also add the
set help
command, after perusing what I got back.
On 10/27/2014 7:56 PM, Kevin Thornsberry wrote:
Can we change our digest settings via e
Thanks Richard. I think that is exactly what I need.
--
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Richard Dell
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 10:26 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Digest Settings
And realizing it might be useful to discuss
Joe, I shoot exclusively RAW. So my settings were to make the JPGs to be
the smallest possible with slightly lower contrast, as IIRC this was the
suggested settings to obtain the look closer to that of the RAW files
when chimping on the camera back screen.
On 12/19/2013 4:23 PM, Joe J
Wondering what those of you with the K-5 IIs have found to be the best default
image settings (at least for jpgs) … do you dial up or down the sharpness
settings at all? Without an anti-aliasing filter, do you find that
sharpness/fine sharpness/extra sharpness makes a particularly good match
Joe,
Been using it as set from the factory.
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Joe J. Wilensky jj...@cornell.edu wrote:
Wondering what those of you with the K-5 IIs have found to be the best
default image settings (at least for jpgs) … do you dial up or down the
sharpness
...@cornell.edu wrote:
Wondering what those of you with the K-5 IIs have found to be the best
default image settings (at least for jpgs) … do you dial up or down the
sharpness settings at all? Without an anti-aliasing filter, do you find that
sharpness/fine sharpness/extra sharpness makes
too much of a burden; if so, ignore this suggestion.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Joe J. Wilensky jj...@cornell.edu wrote:
Wondering what those of you with the K-5 IIs have found to be the best
default image settings (at least for jpgs) … do you dial up or down the
sharpness settings
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013, Larry Colen wrote:
On Feb 16, 2013, at 11:00 AM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013, Larry Colen wrote:
On Feb 16, 2013, at 9:04 AM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
AFAICT, common wisdom is to set these values on the K-5/K-5 II:
Highlight Correction on
So far as I know,
On Feb 18, 2013, at 8:28 , Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
Probably will once I get the hang of RAW editing; for now, I'm sticking
with full-size JPEG -- disk space is cheap.
I've said it dozens of times, but I'll say it again:
If you have something like LightRoom, you don't even have to
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Feb 18, 2013, at 8:28 , Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
Probably will once I get the hang of RAW editing; for now, I'm sticking
with full-size JPEG -- disk space is cheap.
I've said it dozens of times, but I'll say it again:
;-)
If you
[Don't see anything about this in the archives, did I miss something?]
AFAICT, common wisdom is to set these values on the K-5/K-5 II:
Highlight Correction on
Extended ISO
Anyone want to argue against these? Any other defaults people recommend?
One moderate annoyance I discovered while
On Feb 16, 2013, at 9:04 AM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
[Don't see anything about this in the archives, did I miss something?]
AFAICT, common wisdom is to set these values on the K-5/K-5 II:
Highlight Correction on
So far as I know, Highlight correction only affects the JPEGs, so it doesn't
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013, Larry Colen wrote:
On Feb 16, 2013, at 9:04 AM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
AFAICT, common wisdom is to set these values on the K-5/K-5 II:
Highlight Correction on
So far as I know, Highlight correction only affects the JPEGs, so it
doesn't have any effect on photos that
settings (e.g. F2.8, 1/100, ISO160 for
both photo) then in some raw converters (e.g. Raw Therapee 2.4) you'll see that
the photo with d-range on is exactly 1EV underexposed (due to being shot at
ISO80, 1EV less than ISO160). On the other hand some raw converters notice the
d-range on in the exif
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Paul Stenquist
pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Those settings are controlled by the four-way switch, and they apply only
when shooting jpeg. I rarely shoot jpegs, but I keep the broad range setting
on normal, and that has worked fine on the occasions when I
Those settings are controlled by the four-way switch, and they apply only when
shooting jpeg. I rarely shoot jpegs, but I keep the broad range setting on
normal, and that has worked fine on the occasions when I have shot jpegs.
Sharpness and contrast and some other functions are controlled
Paul - Do those settings show up in the Profile setting under the
Camera Calibration tab in Lightroom or ACR? gs
George Sinos
gsi...@gmail.com
www.georgesphotos.net
plus.georgesinos.com
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Those
What does every one here have there image tone and contrast setting on?
Since I'm shooting RAW using CS2 for final image rendition, my camera
settings are all at the factory defaults.
If you're trying to get images directly out of the camera without further
manipulations, then using modified
I use the camera defaults when shooting jpeg, and they seem fine. I
have noticed, and maybe wrong, but my images are sharper on a monitor
than the istD at factory settings.
Dave
On 5/28/07, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does every one here have there image tone and contrast
On May 28, 2007, at 9:52 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
What does every one here have there image tone and contrast
setting on?
Since I'm shooting RAW using CS2 for final image rendition, my
camera
settings are all at the factory defaults.
If you're trying to get images directly out
What does every one here have there image tone and contrast setting on?
I ask this because i ran into a guy the other day with a K10D and a 360FGZ
flash.
He asked me If my K10D over exposes and have I heard about it.
He stated that he got from somewhere, to set image tone to bright and to set
I really can't remember.
As I only shoot RAW, it's never been something I've paid much attention to.
Cheers,
Dave
On 5/27/07, jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does every one here have there image tone and contrast setting on?
I ask this because i ran into a guy the other day with a K10D
I shoot only RAW, so the tone and contrast settings are irrelevant.
Paul
On May 27, 2007, at 5:41 AM, jim wrote:
What does every one here have there image tone and contrast setting
on?
I ask this because i ran into a guy the other day with a K10D and a
360FGZ flash.
He asked me If my
settings are irrelevant.
Paul
On May 27, 2007, at 5:41 AM, jim wrote:
What does every one here have there image tone and contrast setting
on?
I ask this because i ran into a guy the other day with a K10D and a
360FGZ flash.
He asked me If my K10D over exposes and have I heard about it.
He
No problem. Still applies with jpeg.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Saturation/Sharpness/Contrast settings at Natural in K10D
Hi Kenneth
I was a gross misunderstanding on my side of the raw processing bypassing
all
What are your experiences with the settings for saturation, sharpness and
contrast so far?
I've left them all @ default.
You have much better control in PS.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Saturation/Sharpness/Contrast settings
Hi Kenneth
I was a gross misunderstanding on my side of the raw processing bypassing
all of these settings.
Have a little patience with somebody coming from old film cameras ;-)
I will shoot raw only and on my second day in the all digital world I'm busy
reading tutorials about the different raw
Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Kenneth
I was a gross misunderstanding on my side of the raw processing bypassing
all of these settings.
Have a little patience with somebody coming from old film cameras ;-)
I will shoot raw only and on my second day in the all digital world I'm busy
reading
storage . Thats good enough.
thanks
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
David Oswald
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 8:59 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Saturation/Sharpness/Contrast settings at Natural in K10D
Markus Maurer
]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 6:48 AM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Saturation/Sharpness/Contrast settings at Natural in K10D
In a message dated 3/7/2007 6:25:56 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there a difference quality wise between Lightroom, Camera Raw and Pentax
.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 3:46 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Saturation/Sharpness/Contrast settings at Natural in K10D
On Mar 7, 2007, at 6:19 PM, Markus
Hi Markus
Quoting Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm busy
reading tutorials about the different raw converters at the moment
:-)
In case you haven't seen it, there is a comparison of some of the better raw
converters on the OK1000 Pentax Blog:
http://ok1000.blogspot.com/index.html
Hi Brian
that's good news for me, thanks for the link!
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Brian Walters
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 10:23 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: Saturation/Sharpness/Contrast settings at Natural
On Mar 8, 2007, at 12:57 PM, Markus Maurer wrote:
thanks for you very valuable information.
I had a quick glance at lightroom but somehow got lost in the
interface and
all the possibilities.
For a start, ACR and Photoshop will be good enough, as long as I
keep the
raw files archived I
Hi K10D users
What are your experiences with the settings for saturation, sharpness and
contrast so far?
Can I just leave them at the default natural setting or would I even get
better results lowering for ex. in camera sharpening (and/or
saturation/contrast) and doing that as the last step
if you shoot raw those settings are irrelevant.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Markus Maurer
Sent: 08 March 2007 00:37
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Saturation/Sharpness/Contrast settings at Natural in K10D
Hi
Since I capture using RAW format 99.9% of the time, all the image
processing settings like sharpness, contrast, white balance, etc are
almost entirely irrelevant.
I suggest you leave the settings at the defaults and then experiment
if you're unhappy with some aspect of how they render
Markus Maurer wrote:
What are your experiences with the settings for saturation,
sharpness and contrast so far?
Personally, I just shoot PEFs and worry about that stuff in post.
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
Thanks Godfrey, Bob and Doug.
I see now, these settings only affect JPG..
I will shoot raw only, after scanning film for years processing raw is
peanuts :-)
As far as my understanding regarding raw processing goes so far, as much
adjustments as possible with the exception of sharpening and maybe
settings are good enough I could batch process pef's with Bridge/
Photoshop,
any opinions on that?
It is very rare that the auto-defaults of any of these things produce
the best results. By and large, I built up my own set of defaults for
Camera Raw and automated most of the grunt work of my image
Markus Maurer wrote:
I will shoot raw only, after scanning film for years processing
raw is peanuts :-)
No kidding! Especially compared to my CanoScan FS-4000. I love the
quality of the scans, but it's *sooww* at maximum resolution.
As far as my understanding regarding raw
In a message dated 3/7/2007 6:25:56 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there a difference quality wise between Lightroom, Camera Raw and Pentax
Laboratory or other raw converters?
Camera Raw seem to be the simplest for me on first sight and if it's auto
settings are good
- Original Message -
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Where Lightroom stores settings, data etc
Thanks for the consideration on behalf on the audience Ken ;-)
The keyword in the first sentence is _based_ on 1500 pictures. I've
already got 1100 in the bin, more will follow. Don't worry
1/ As I understand, when Lightroom imports data it copies it to it own
storage area (which means I'd beter have anough space for it). And I
can backup the originals elsewhere once the import is done.
2/ Lightroom also stores previews, its database etc... Can I ask
Lightroom to store *everything*
.
Lightroom imports the photos
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Thibouille
Sent: 04 February 2007 09:00
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Where Lightroom stores settings, data etc
1/ As I understand, when Lightroom imports
Hi Thibouille,
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 10:00:00 +0100, Thibouille wrote:
1/ As I understand, when Lightroom imports data it copies it to it own
storage area (which means I'd beter have anough space for it).
I think you get the choice, either create copies (taking up much space)
or reference an
Sent: 4. februar 2007 11:01
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Where Lightroom stores settings, data etc
Hi Thibouille,
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 10:00:00 +0100, Thibouille wrote:
1/ As I understand, when Lightroom imports data it copies it to it own
storage area (which means I'd beter have
*everything* on another drive? It'd make things a
lot easier if any OS/apps reinstallation is needed. It could even be
used to share the dtabase betwenn computers ...
The Lightroom Library (or managed files directory tree) contains all
the caches, information and settings it makes as well
Tim, I'm not Godfrey either but unless you're trying to put your audience to
sleep, you better cut the size of your slideshow down or go thru them
really, really fast.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Where Lightroom stores settings
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
