c'mon, man, i don't think here's anyone on this list *that* insane.
mishka
> You find out how stupid you really are when you go to a shopping mall
> the day after Thanksgiving. Aargh!
>
> Len
> * There's no place like 127.0.0.1
Great work Herb. I really like DSCN1346a - though it could use a more
catchy title! :-)
- MCC
-
Mark Cassino Photography
Kalamazoo, MI
http://www.markcassino.com
-
What a clever little man!! Only my first was anywhere near sitting/standing
before seven
months, the other two have been lazy! lol. My daughter is 14 mths old and
only just walking
now, mind you she doesn't NEED to walk cause the boys carry (or DRAG!) her
everywhere!
Can't wait to see some shots
the only one of my friends to own an Imacon uses it at no higher than
4000dpi and says that its a waste of resolution too. going to true 16-bit
mode instead of adding the bits from 14-bit mode is the only major thing i
would like changed. have you compared a Nikon 4000ED to the Imacon? there
are 40
Gorgeous! I would never post any of my landscape photography attempts, I am
truly hopeless! Give me a nice smile and a cute pair of eyes any day I
envy your ability though, you have done a beautiful job!
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROT
Ok, just got back from Thanksgiving with the sister, her family, and my
parents. shot only a few (40 or so) images with the ist-D. Started looking
at them on my home computer today. well, while inserting and ejecting the
CF cards as I normally do one of them got a bit corrupted. It showed 488MB
Herb Chong wrote:
well, i bought a Nikon 4000ED and i have done about 1000 scans with it so
far. every now and then, i wish i had bought the mounted slide feeder, but i
haven't, so i have to do it the hard way, one at a time. it takes about
40-50 mounted slides at once. i experimented some turnin
Hand stitch or via stitching program?
At 04:24 PM 11/29/2003 -0500, you wrote:
I'm still fine tuning it, but here's how my latest panorama project
looks at the moment:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/pghsmall.jpg
5 slides combined into one shot.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.roberts
Holy Mackeral, Wendy! Quite a collection you have there! What a diehard
Pentax
fan you are! Great to see another girl as passionate about her "love" as
moi!
tan.x.
" I also still own 3 MXes, an LX, an MZ-S and a 67. I'm not about to
part
with any of them. If I did, it would be the LX and 67. I l
I like this breezebrowser program folks have recommended, but I ran into a
problem,
seems every now and then when I asked it to rotate an image, it would
corrupt the
EXIF data and then the JPG wouldn't load!
My work flow is to copy all files from camera to a folder in HD and then
work with them
> -Original Message-
> From: Shel Belinkoff
>
> With fond memories of surveys past :
>
>
> 1) How many have totally given up shooting film and have moved
> completely to digital (That means no film and film cameras in your
> equipment cabinet)?
>
> 2) How many are in the process of doing so
At 03:51 PM 29/11/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Just a personal observation.Any comments about colour neg film app.
Dave
Reala. My fave.
W.
Wendy Beard,
Ottawa, Canada
http://www.beard-redfern.com
> 3) How many have made the switch to digital, but
keep a film camera
> around for one reason or another, although you do
not use,
> and have not
> used, the film camera since acquiring your digital
camera?
>
Hey That's Me !!!
Since I got my *ist D, I haven't used my MZ-S, PZ-1p
or my old Super
Gorgeous stuff Herb! I am a "people" photography by preference, but deep
down I still love to do flowers and all manner of "pretty" things that
mother
nature provides us with. Absolutely DISASTROUS at landscapes though!
The colours and sharpness in all of your shots are sensational. I am SO
suf
I just wrote Paul that you'd probably jump in with a criticism of my
position, and bingo, here you are.
OK, let's leave it at this: you're right for what you do, and I'm right for what
I do and from what I've seen. IMO, the Nikon is a consumer scanner, although a
good one. One thing that's of
There's more to it than "details of the grain."
One of the things I noticed was increased sharpness on most scans, due, I'm
sure, to the way the Imacons hold the slide against the drum and the more
even scanning the drum scanner provides, as well as better shadow detail and
better separation in th
the Nikon isn't a consumer scanner except to those owning Imacon's, and
there are a lot more professionals using Nikons than Imacons. i have some
friends who did the comparison and decided that Imacon's were a waste of
resolution. if i can see film grain clouds clearly, then more highly defined
clo
I can see details of the grain when scanning 6x7 film on my Epson 3200.
When printing it out on my Epson 1200 printer, the resolution is as
good as I can get from the local pro labs on a C-Print. But perhaps the
labs aren't all that good. (They do produce most of the work for some
local big nam
I certainly don't know. The magazines I shoot for want 40 megabyte
files. The stock house I shoot for wants 40 megabyte files. My Epson
3200 will yield just about exactly that when scanning 35mm full frame.
When I scan medium format, I still scan full frame at 3200, then
downsize in PhotoShop.
Have you ever scanned at 8000dpi with an Imacon or similar scanner, and then
compared the results to a consumer scanner like the Nikon Coolscan 4000?
Herb Chong wrote:
> having done a lot of scanning of Provia 100F and Velvia at 4000dpi, i don't
> seen anything except more film grain unless shoot
What is a "professional image?"
graywolf wrote:
> I read someones comment one that 385 megabytes was the minimum files size for
> professional images.
No ... since a flatbed can't make hi-res scans. Yes, if all you're doing is
counting scans, but if you consider the quality, then the fb can never be
amortized ... apples and oranges, imo.
graywolf wrote:
> So basically 30 scans would pay for the scanner?
>
>
> Herb Chong wrote:
>
> > how much d
>
> The HP S20 is the old Hewlitt Packard Photosmart scanner. It was an
> inexpensive, but surprisingly good scanner for it's time.
> I had it's predecssor, the S10, which IIRC, wasn't improved on very much
> with the new model.
I'd question that. I, too, had an S10, which I eventually replaced
Still shooting film. Can't get enough resolution for my needs in Pentax
digital. Waiting for 10 megapixels, but will probably shoot some film
forever. Can't see giving up my Leicas or my LX.
Paul
On Saturday, November 29, 2003, at 12:59 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
With fond memories of surveys pas
Cheers to you, Cotty. Time to fill the glass. It is a holiday weekend
over here.
Paul
On Saturday, November 29, 2003, at 12:02 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 29/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Dewars White Label, a decent blended Scotch Whiskey. Okay, maybe three
years, but low cost/high res is coming
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Owens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> This brings a question to my feeble mind. How many
> musicians do we have
> here on the list?
I have 1 electric bass, 4 electric guitars, 1 electric 12 string, and
2 amps.
I would hesitate to call myself a musician.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I did not have any ill effects from the food actually it
> was quite good. Tom did you ever
> finish all that beer?
No. I'm working on it.
tv
>
I'm #3.
--
Thomas Van Veen Photography
www.thomasvanveen.com
301-758-3085
> -Original Message-
> From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 1:00 PM
> To: PDML
> Subject: Silly Digital Survey
>
>
> With fond memories of surveys past :
>
>
> 1) H
On Nov 29, 2003, at 3:03 PM, Frank wrote:
Well, no one has said it so far, but I gotta tell you, Cam (is it okay
if I
call you Cam?): YOU DA MAN!!
That is ~way~ cule! You got to be a Pap this summer, and you didn't
tell us
until now? Just waiting for the right time, eh? Sounds like a real
e
oh, i forgot to mention, the Nikon pictures are in sRGB while the Pentax
ones are in Adobe RGB.
Herb
here are some pictures taken in the last month and a half of various fall
scenes. these are mostly taken with my Nikon Coolpix 5000 P&S digital camera
but the last bunch are with my *istD including the batch, the ones of the
flowers and butterflies, i took with Cesar at the American Museum of Natur
well, i bought a Nikon 4000ED and i have done about 1000 scans with it so
far. every now and then, i wish i had bought the mounted slide feeder, but i
haven't, so i have to do it the hard way, one at a time. it takes about
40-50 mounted slides at once. i experimented some turning off the Digital
IC
having done a lot of scanning of Provia 100F and Velvia at 4000dpi, i don't
seen anything except more film grain unless shooting with a macro lens on a
tripod. i would much rather have higher bit depth, preferably the full 16
bits per channel like the new Nikon 5000 ED.
Herb...
- Original Mess
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> With fond memories of surveys past :
>
>
> 1) How many have totally given up shooting film and have moved
> completely to digital (That means no film and film cameras in your
> equipment cabinet)?
That would be me!
Chri
Where is the location?
Jim A.
> From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 16:24:53 -0500
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Panorama project
> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Resent-Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 16:22:15 -0500
>
> I'm still fine tuni
Mark wrote:
I once saw Jaco Pastorius, sadly towards the end of his life when mental
illness was overcoming him completely. He was so incoherent that the
club ended up refunding everyone who came to both his shows that night.
:(
Same here. He knew my old bass teacher up in Boston and showed up at
Mark,
and why is that annoying? they charge it, the market bears it --
what is exactly wrong with it? they are not a non-profit organization.
besides, when ebay and paypal were separate, did that make you feel
better about charges?
mishka
> The thing that annoys be greatly is that with eBay now o
Nifty, Mark.
Mark Roberts wrote:
I'm still fine tuning it, but here's how my latest panorama project
looks at the moment:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/pghsmall.jpg
5 slides combined into one shot.
--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com
"You might as well accept people as they are,
you are not g
I read someones comment one that 385 megabytes was the minimum files size for
professional images. Maybe you ought to keep that in mind, Shel (GRIN).
I also read where most of the folks who have a lot of achived images to
digitalize have already dones so, and they are not going to redo all that
You find out how stupid you really are when you go to a shopping mall
the day after Thanksgiving. Aargh!
Len
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
> -Original Message-
> From: mishka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 6:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
So basically 30 scans would pay for the scanner?
Of course that does not take into consideration your time learning to use it
properly and your time doing the scanning. I noticed a 50-100 slide batch
scanner in the new B&H Digital Catalog for $700, but it is only 3600 dpi. But
that may be a bag
sure. 7lbs of camera, 7lbs of tripod and head, focusing under the dark
cloth... all the bells and whistles from glorious '20s
mishka
> You realize that you can get an inexpensive view camera, a couple of
> lenses and a roll film back for not much money?
>
> William Robb
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Leon Altoff wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 09:59:58 -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> >1) How many have totally given up shooting film and have moved
> >completely to digital (That means no film and film cameras in your
> >equipment cabinet)?
>
> I have 4 camera bodies. *istD, 2 x
Some comments on the S20 inline:
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff"
Subject: Re: New scanner
Is a 2400 dpi HP S20 a film scanner?
What about comparisons with a 2800 dpi film scanner? Have you had a
chance to
compare?
A big part of why I'm asking is tha
crossing from NY to Ontario has always been as easy as from NH to MA.
it's much more aggravating coming back though.
but all the people travelling on thanxgiving -- they must be insane.
it took me 3 hours to get to new haven, which normally takes half
that time (i realized how stupid i was only aft
Depends on the resolution and the equipment used. Prices start at about $25.00
... however, one lab may be renting their Imacons, so I can get up to 8000dpi
for only $20/hr or so. Minimum high res is 6000dpi for 35mm. 4000dpi is for
"hobby scanning"
Herb Chong wrote:
> how much do you pay for
My humble attempt at the same (has very little to do with Pentax though)
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1942931&size=lg
Mishka
Hi,
I had this very same problem, too!
Couldn't figure out why, perhaps bad connections inside the battery
pack?
I realised that the contact pins on different brand NiMH cells differ a
little in their dimensions.
Still need to figure out which set does the most trouble.
But in the meantime I went
There are folks that don't want digital photos. I shoot film for them.
They are getting fewer rapidly. I try to shoot digital as much as
possible. I keep my PZ-1p for the folks that want me to use film. I
also have a few older film bodies that I have no intention of selling,
whether I ever use
Hello all of you,
I have been away for some weeks and subscribed again today.
I think I missed this list!
I got an *ist-D in the meantime, so I will have lot of questions I think
:-)
Glad to be back again, able to participate in all this wisdom ... :-)
Thomas (from Germany)
Hi, Shel,
1) Still a film diehard. Digital? We don't need no stinking digital!
2) I don't see myself doing digital until I absolutely have to. Like when
I can't get film any more. And by film I mean (as many of you know) HP5+ or
Tri-X (I'd go T-Max or Delta if I couldn't get the previous
Hehe,
that's funny.
Lots of bass players here.
I also play bass and at the same time I do the lead vocals in a band.
The band was founded 1991 as a kind of high-school band, but it still
exists today.
As you can guess, I am a bit younger than most of you here, so the kind
of music might not quite
Yeah, but in people years that's like 84...
-frank
(heading down to the fridge for another Guinness)
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sheesh, I'm still only 12.
Cheers,
C
this fits me closest. i have some film left to polish off, but after that i
am not sure which film i will end up with. i normally shoot Provia 100F with
Velvia 50 sometimes. i used to use Provia 400F for my long lens shots
because i needed the speed for the higher shutter speeds. now, if i am going
Said like a good Catholic, Ann!
Mind you, I don't remember the priest in the confessional ever saying the
"or whatever turns you on" part at the end of my confessions.
cheers,
frank the lapsed Catholic (or as my sister calls me a "recovering Catholic"
"The optimist thinks this is the best
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
> With fond memories of surveys past :
>
> 1) How many have totally given up shooting film and have moved
> completely to digital (That means no film and film cameras in your
> equipment cabinet)?
Still film only.
>
> 2) How many are in the process of doing so (like B
Hi, Bill,
I'm still up here - but I'll make sure to turn 'em out before I leave (which
will be for GFM, BTW!)
Which reminds me, I've only crossed the border once since 9/11. I
understand the days may be long gone that we can cross the border with ease
(and with no documents). I don't even ha
Well, no one has said it so far, but I gotta tell you, Cam (is it okay if I
call you Cam?): YOU DA MAN!!
That is ~way~ cule! You got to be a Pap this summer, and you didn't tell us
until now? Just waiting for the right time, eh? Sounds like a real
education.
So, you mention body doubles fo
5) None of the above.
I've had a digital camera for over 3 years, but I still use film.
With a *ist-D in the camera case I expect the ratio to shift more
to digital, but I'll still have a film body with me. Not just as
a backup, and not just for the wide-angle shots; I sometimes take
the identi
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Mark Roberts wrote:
> I'm still fine tuning it, but here's how my latest panorama project
> looks at the moment:
> http://www.robertstech.com/temp/pghsmall.jpg
>
> 5 slides combined into one shot.
>
Nice work. I like it.
- Chris
--
Chris Murray /"\
[
On 29/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
> 0) How many own a decent digital (3-4 megs), but haven't given up shooting
>film. We just use the digital for snaps...
Snaps? *Snaps*? Dear boy, I paint with light!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
I wrote:
> Furthermore, there's no documented smc difference between K-series and
> M-series. Pentax claimed that when turning from M-series to A-series, smc
> was applied to all surfaces (including glass-to-glass ones), while K and M
> only had smc on glass-to-air surfaces.
I was wrong. The clai
On 29/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>1) How many have totally given up shooting film and have moved
>completely to digital (That means no film and film cameras in your
>equipment cabinet)?
Nearly.
>
>2) How many are in the process of doing so (like Bruce, who is actually
>selling equipment
On 29/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>> How many musicians? was Re: where are you ? and digital vs film
>
>I am a classical flutist, have 2 degrees in music, and have attended
>masterclasses with Sir James Galway, Jean-Pierre Rampal, William
>Bennett, Louis Moyse, and many others. I also p
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts"
Subject: Another lens I can't afford for my 645
> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/hartblei45.shtml
>
> 45mm shift/tilt lens!
You realize that you can get an inexpensive view camera, a couple of lenses
and a roll film back for n
I'm still fine tuning it, but here's how my latest panorama project
looks at the moment:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/pghsmall.jpg
5 slides combined into one shot.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
I bought the 3200 scanner in August and I'm very happy with it. It's
straightforward to use, and does great scans with negs or prints, with very
good shadow detail. When scanning negs, particularly images with dark
backgrounds, use "Normal" preview, rather than "Auto", as it may crop part
of the
I just returned from a 400+ mile round trip to take the father-in-law home
from the Thanksgiving Day holiday. I sure saw a lot of Ontario, Canada
license plates heading both north and south. Did the last person out of
Ontario remember to turn off the lights? 8-)
Bill
One word. WOW!!!
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Cameron Hood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax Pentax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: How many musicians? was Re: where are you ? and digital vs film
>
> On Nov 29, 2003, at 7:40 AM, Bill Owe
> With fond memories of surveys past :
>
>
> 1) How many have totally given up shooting film and have moved
> completely to digital (That means no film and film cameras in your
> equipment cabinet)?
>
> 2) How many are in the process of doing so (like Bruce, who is actually
> selling equipment
"Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/hartblei45.shtml
>>
>> 45mm shift/tilt lens!
>>
>Impressing.
>I would have loved to trade it for the pentax A-45/2.8, which I'm not all
>together happy with.
Really
> With fond memories of surveys past :
I guess it ~is~ titled a "digital survey"...
> 1) [snipped]
> 2) [snipped]
> 3) [snipped]
> 4) To put the numbers in perspective, how many list members are
> there.
5) Or, how many have not not made any such switch at all?
Fred, K1FW
Impressing.
I would have loved to trade it for the pentax A-45/2.8, which I'm not all
together happy with.
Jostein
-
Pictures at: http://oksne.net
-
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wow, thats quite the rumination. I feel honored that you are dedicating a page to
shots
that were just playing around, but I am looking forward to seeing them. I just wanted
to
say thanks to Tom for hosting and to you and Christian for letting me play with the
*ist
D, its a nice camera and
Shel,
How about one more category...
0) How many own a decent digital (3-4 megs), but haven't given up shooting
film. We just use the digital for snaps...
Regards, Bob S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 1) How many have totally given up shooting film and have moved
> completely to digital (T
"David Madsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Two bassists posts back to back, at least in the order that my server sent
>them to me. I have been listening to Jonas Hellborg's "The Word" a little
>lately. Very good album for bass enthusiasts.
Wow! I'd forgotten about him! I don't have any of his
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 09:59:58 -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>1) How many have totally given up shooting film and have moved
>completely to digital (That means no film and film cameras in your
>equipment cabinet)?
I have 4 camera bodies. *istD, 2 x MZ-S and an MX which was my first
SLR and I keep f
"Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This brings a question to my feeble mind. How many musicians do we have
>here on the list? I know there are a few guitarists, and, if I'm not
>mistaken, a conductor. I play trombone in our local community concert band,
>and have been a member there for 1
Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 29/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>
>>> At 71 I guess I'm close to being the most ancient.
>>>
>>
>>Gotta beat 73. . . To me, that's the late middle's. . .
>
>Sheesh, I'm still only 12.
"Boys start to imitate men at age 12. And continue to do so for t
Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Here's the next one:
>
>165/2.8 portrait lens. In EX+ condition. Includes original front and
>rear caps.
G. If I weren't saving my pennies for an *ist-D I'd snap that up in
a moment to use on my 645 :(
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.ro
This is a nice LX that I am selling...recently CLA'ed by Pentax.
Auction ends Sunday evening...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2967331847
Regards, Bob S.
And a very imature 12 at that (GRIN).
--
Cotty wrote:
Sheesh, I'm still only 12.
--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com
"You might as well accept people as they are,
you are not going to be able to change them anyway."
Hi!
BO> This brings a question to my feeble mind. How many musicians do we have
BO> here on the list? I know there are a few guitarists, and, if I'm not
BO> mistaken, a conductor. I play trombone in our local community concert band,
BO> and have been a member there for 11 years.
BO> Bill
My f
Well having shot 20 rolls of film since getting the
6x7 back in April,i
have found a few films i like so far and searching for others.
Slide film: has got to be Kodaks E 100VS.Nice colours and deep blue skies.I was using
Fu
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Shel Belinkoff"
> Subject: Re: New scanner
>
>
> > You're going to use a flatbed scanner for 35mm negatives? Say it isn't
> so, Joe!
>
> These Epsons have a light source in the lid, so there isn't the kludge of
William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Cotty"
> Subject: Re: where are you ? and digital vs film
>
> >
> > Sheesh, I'm still only 12.
> >
> Ya, well I'm only 11.
>
> William Robb
Bill, you can't count in dog years, ya know - t'aint
fair :)
ann
Keith Whaley wrote:
> Dr E D F Williams wrote:
> >
> > At 71 I guess I'm close to being the most ancient.
> >
>
> Gotta beat 73. . . To me, that's the late middle's. . .
>
> keith whaley
Phew! I'm just a still a girl then :)
annsan
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty"
Subject: Re: An observation re Pentax for sale
> On 28/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>
> >> lol! so I take it that you're not married then William?
> >
> >Twenty wonderful years so far, and I love her more now than I did when I
> >married her.
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff"
Subject: Re: New scanner
> You're going to use a flatbed scanner for 35mm negatives? Say it isn't
so, Joe!
These Epsons have a light source in the lid, so there isn't the kludge of
adding an adaptor and mirrors and whatnot.
The 2450 does a s
- Original Message -
From: "Herb Chong"
Subject: Re: Show and Tell - AF 50mm f1.7...
> i said once that if you had film with 10 stops dynamic range, you could
> shoot a lot of great landscape and nature shots at high noon on a sunny
day
> and was thoroughly ridiculed for it. now that i
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty"
Subject: Re: where are you ? and digital vs film
>
> Sheesh, I'm still only 12.
>
Ya, well I'm only 11.
William Robb
How do we know his wasn't a "shotgun" wedding?
Len
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
> -Original Message-
> From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 9:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: An observation re Pentax for sale
>
>
Raimo,
Nice winder at a good price. It makes the ME Super much easier to hold, more
comfortable.
I find winders are a great way to get a 2nd or 3rd shot without taking your
eye away from the viewfinder. (Some of the best people photos disappear while
I'm winding.) Overall they are a great i
"Butch Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The battery designation is 1/3n, 2L76, or 58, depending on
> manufacturer.
...and on this side of the pond, it's often called a CR1.
-tih
--
Tom Ivar Helbekkmo, Senior System Administrator, EUnet Norway
www.eunet.no T: +47-22092958 M: +47-93013940 F:
the "just for fun" are the most important. they are the ones where you can
experiment and try things just to see what happens. with large format, just
about every shot is a money shot. that and the limited range of focal
lengths available forces a lot of conservative shooting techniques.
i said on
Hi,
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
>
> On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, David Madsen wrote:
>
> > Just out of curiosity, do you think it could be a crack in one of the inner
> > elements?
>
> Yes, I fear this could be the case.
I would expect a crack to have less of a line appearance, especially if
you move
The Epson 3200 will produce nice scans from 35mm film. Scanned at 3200
and ized to 300dpi, you get a print of approximagely 10 x13. I've shown
some of mine to the lab guys. They were sure I had shot them on 6x7.
Paul
On Saturday, November 29, 2003, at 01:44 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
You're going
Same with mine, probably. Only tested with two battery sets in it.
Got a USB2 card reader, though, so I never thought much about it.
Must be a firmware bug.
Jostein
-
Pictures at: http://oksne.net
-
- Original Message -
From: "Tige
Dewars White Label, a decent blended Scotch Whiskey. Okay, maybe three
years, but low cost/high res is coming.
On Friday, November 28, 2003, at 06:47 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 28/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I will
go digital when I can get 10 megapixels for less than $500. I figure
about 18 m
Hi,
Cameron Hood wrote:
> he is up here screwing a bunch
> of strippers
> with fake boobs from a Hell's Angels bar, with god knows what kind of
> STD's.
Questions:
So there are jobs that are even more unpleasant than the paparazzi's
lot?
Who would be less pleasant to meet: Affleck or the
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
