it is way better.
And it will be available for download for the *istD too, at some future time
after release of the *istDs.
Sam
From: cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wondering if the software that ships with the *ist Ds is any better than
what we (the D owners) got...
CW
---
Outgoing mail is
Sorry for asking again, but has anyone experience of the 100mm Macro in the
F-version?
Peter, Sweden
Very nice shot, Boris.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Boris Liberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 16. november 2004 05:08
Til: PDML
Emne: PAW - Haifa
Hi!
For those of you who ponder your possible visit to Israel.
Funny! Low AOV or tall postman :-)
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 15. november 2004 18:52
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: PAW PESO - Air Mail
Just a silly snap, referencing
Considering how prevalent Photoshop is in current photographic workflow,
perhaps this isn't very much off topic at all. Tonight, while exploring
the program, I discovered a new (to me) tool, buried beneath the Blur tool
along with the Smudge tool. It's the Sharpen tool.
You can use it as
Andy Chang mused:
Thank you James for the info.
I had a quick look and read the part most important to me several times
(Page 179 of the manual, Page 181 on the PDF doc).
Correct me if I'm wrong...
1. Does it mean that the DS will only meter at wide open with the old
lens?
Yes - just like
Why would you want to even out tonality in sky? Surely that would increase
blandness or introduce artificiality?
mike
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2004/11/15 Mon PM 05:52:14 GMT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAW PESO - Air Mail
Just a silly snap, referencing something
Thanks, it does answer some questions.
So it lacks the bargraph in viewfinder but at least it displays
numerically the difference from metered exposure, which makes the
manual mode almost useable.
Looking in the viewfinder display again, the area wasted with
program mode icons and
I just looked at the pic and the browser window was resized. Hmmm
Shel
...the site that hosts your photographs is very badly behaved. It
resizes my browser window without asking my permission.
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For me it's the process as much as the result, the journey
as much as the destination.
Sometimes, even more than...
Particularly the journey to work 8-)
mike
-
Email provided by http://www.ntlhome.com/
Looks like you're describing an image editing program and browser. I
thought you meant improved camera software. I couldn't care less about
editing and viewing software unless it has to be used to view and edit
istDS files, which seems doubtful. Thanks for taking the time to post.
Shel
On 16/11/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Why would you want to even out tonality in sky? Surely that would
increase blandness or introduce artificiality?
Aha, to increase blandness suggests that there is some blandness there to
begin with :-))
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
Aaah, you meant the firmware - I got no idea about that, I meant the
software coming with the *istD, not it's firmware.
The firmware of the *istDs has some small improvements compared to the
*istD, but I don't have the reference here (am not at home right now), and
I got no clue at all if these
i see someone rehashing the same photographic subjects over and over.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 9:05 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Reducing File Size with Photoshop
You don't seem to get it, Herb. I
Firmware, software one day I've gotta learn these terms ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Sam Jost [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aaah, you meant the firmware - I got no idea about that, I meant the
software coming with the *istD, not it's firmware.
The firmware of the *istDs has some small
Herb Chong wrote:
i see someone rehashing the same photographic subjects over and over.
Be nice. Some people would say the same thing about wildlife photography.
S
I just want to learn more techniques for doing something like that, not
that I'd always want to do it. This pic seemed like it would lend itself
to learning and practicing some new techniques.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why would you want to even out
well, the firmware is software, it's just confusing since a lot of other
stuff is software, too.
sorry for the confusion.
Sam
Firmware, software one day I've gotta learn these terms ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Sam Jost [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aaah, you meant the firmware - I got
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Joseph Tainter wrote:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=11073371
I hope they make it a constant f4. If it's another cheap, variable
aperture telezoom, I'll probably pass. Since the excellent SMC F 70-210,
Pentax hasn't done too well with those.
http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=pentax_forumno=6274
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
On 16 Nov 2004 at 3:49, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I just want to learn more techniques for doing something like that, not
that I'd always want to do it. This pic seemed like it would lend itself
to learning and practicing some new techniques.
That's how I learned PS, I set myself little
On 16 Nov 2004 at 2:58, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Looks like you're describing an image editing program and browser. I
thought you meant improved camera software. I couldn't care less about
editing and viewing software unless it has to be used to view and edit
istDS files, which seems doubtful.
heh, heh...I do!
I like those horizontal nerf bars. Bumpers they are not!
And, those windshield wipers brought back memories of vacuum-operated
wipers!
The angle of the shot brought out the beastliness (size-wise) of the
car. Well chosen...
keith
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
LOL Your comments reminded me of a story about Bill Gates. What did his
wife say to him after the honeymoon?
Well, now I know why you call it Microsoft
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Sam Jost [EMAIL PROTECTED]
well, the firmware is software, it's just confusing since a lot of other
Good tip!
I can see where that might be quite useful.
keith
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Considering how prevalent Photoshop is in current photographic workflow,
perhaps this isn't very much off topic at all. Tonight, while exploring
the program, I discovered a new (to me) tool, buried beneath the Blur
Thanks Shel. Nice car, but that bra is disgusting. I don't like them on
any car. The shot is just okay, don't you think? Looks like the guy did
a lot of vignetting to keep the environment from looking too busy.
Paul
On Nov 16, 2004, at 12:56 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I wrote:
Hence, lenses with the most circular aperture holes (many aperture blades)
will keep the round shape the longest.
Which means that out of focus areas will be softer and less edgy than lenses
with few aperture blades. The drawback (dependent on point of view) is that
doughnut shapes
On 16 Nov 2004 at 13:52, Pål Jensen wrote:
Yes, doughnuts happens with all lens at certain conditions due to the laws of
optics. If you scan through the Pentax photo annual books you'll see virtually
all lenses made by Pentax creates this effect under certain circumstances.
I agree, even
Collin wrote:
On the top photo, taken with the 77, the light reflections in the leaves have
a definite doughnut character.
Same with the reflections off the tail light of the white (does that say
Park) minivan.
Doesn't look good for the 77. Am I wrong?
Yes, doughnuts happens with
The download is huge and yet the images are only 4 MPixel. How
disappointing.
Servus, Alin
Alan wrote:
AC http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=pentax_forumno=6274
Peter Smekal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for asking again, but has anyone experience of the 100mm Macro in the
F-version?
I have one. It's supposedly the same optical design as the FA-100/2.8
Macro. Very sharp indeed.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Not sure if this made it through last time, so here it is again...
Earlier we discussed a listing for photo comps,
I have start a list here, if anybody wants to list something there
is a form to submit competitions
http://www.wildcherry.com.au/index.php?p=contest
Kind regards
Kevin
P.S. Oh,
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re:nbsp;Dsnbsp;software?
Firmware, software one day I've gotta learn these terms ;-))
Firmware is the software that runs the camera.
I am pretty sure they call it that to try to confuse us poor mortals.
William Robb
I see the only film cameras remaining on the Pentax US site are:
ist, ZX-60, ZX-M. No MZ-S.
What was the production volume of that camera.
Sincerely,
C. Brendemuehl
'Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have come to
realize that it
On the top photo, taken with the 77, the light reflections in the leaves have a
definite doughnut character.
Same with the reflections off the tail light of the white (does that say
Park) minivan.
Doesn't look good for the 77. Am I wrong?
Sincerely,
C. Brendemuehl
Hi Bruce,
how good is your Sigma 55-200/3.5-5.6 DC?
It is quite cheap - is it worth the money?
I need some lightweight telezoom only for *ist D,
Regards
Peter Belak
Right now, my lightweight kit is the *istD (sans grip), DA 16-45 and
Sigma 55-200/3.5-5.6 DC. I would love to have a
William wrote:
I never noticed that they had a commitmant to pro level 35mm.
When did this happen?
Are you talking about that time in 1980?
That was just one camera, not a commitmant.
They do make some mighty nice lenses though.
REPLY:
Their commitment seems as strong as the commitment they've
Melchi wrote:
4. It seems that Pentax's commitment to pro-level 35mm equipment has
disappeared. Now their development seems to be focusing on consumer-level
digital equipment (Note: This does not apply to their Med Format gear, which is
great).
REPLY:
Nobody knows where Pentax is going and
On 16 Nov 2004 at 1:51, Jens Bladt wrote:
The Sigma shot really has a lot of purple fringing. Mine doesn't have a lot,
just a little, hardly noticeable. Avoiding CA totally is not possible in the
real world, where light is ruled by the laws of the rainbow :-). Some computer
programs can even
On 15 Nov 2004 at 15:52, Keith Whaley wrote:
Maybe ¾ off the left side, leave the rest alone...
Thanks for the suggestion Keith, I tend to get so bound into preserving the
aspect ratio that I sometimes limit my options prematurely.
On 16 Nov 2004 at 1:06, Jens Bladt wrote:
I kinda like it
I thought this was interesting as much for where it's published as
anything else. The Register is a UK-based computer trade paper.
http://www.theregister.com/2004/11/15/review_pentax_optio_x/
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
KK With TTL, constant aperture is not that big a thing if you can take
For many, it is. It makes it impossible to shoot in manual mode in
lower light, as much good the metering can be, I had much better
results when I simply dialed exposure for the environment I was in.
And you can't hold
Great! thanks
Good light!
fra
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:52:14 -0800, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a silly snap, referencing something Frank mentioned a while back.
Maybe someone has a suggestion for evening out the tonality in the sky,
which is really why I posted this image instead of one of some similar pics.
Frank,
I think that's smugmug and it's not free AFAIK.
Doesn't your ISP provide any free web space?
CW
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault
Who's Amita with? Mug-something-or-other? Anyone have any thoughts
on that place? Is it free?
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus
Hi Frank,
This site was designed specifically for PAW type photos. I believe it's
free (I signed up but haven't used it yet), and it was organized and pit
together by some Leica people. Might be worth checking into:
http://www.fotoweek.com/fotoweek/ or
http://www.fotoweek.com/
Amita is with
Ever since there was an issue with Yahoo taking images and/or designs off of
peoples freebie web sites, which if you read the fine print was legal for
them to do, I have been nervous about posting on any web space other then my
own. That doesn't mean folks can't still attempt to steal my images,
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Steve Desjardins wrote:
Best of Luck! It's amazing that stuff has gotten so routine.
It was introduced to my family as such 13 years ago that my dad had a
quadruple (on three arteries).
Get well soon Vic. Make sure you establish a good exercise routine and
keep to it even
This may produce a few grins:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/54-computer.jpg
Shel
Frantisek wrote:
OTOH, some of them are really sneaky. It includes some competitions
which are simply ripoffs. Like the Cohasset Colonials Photography
Competition, giving your picture to an advertising of some furniture
for mere 100$, and not even in cash, but in gift certificate! Same is
Hello Peter,
I would say that it is well worth the money if you are looking for a
small, light zoom. It is quite sharp, and is nice to manually focus.
The barrel rotates when focusing so use of a polarizer or graduated
filters can be clumsy.
Here are some more recent shots taken with it:
On 16/11/04, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
This may produce a few grins:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/54-computer.jpg
Shel
Hey nice shot Shel - what film were you using back then?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Isn't that the latest Apple Mac? runs hides...
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 November 2004 16:23
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Home Computer Prediction From 1954
This may produce a few grins:
PS. ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Hi Rob
A scene like this, which may be gone the next time you come back, is best
photographed from many points of view. Even subtle changes in camera angle
can make a big difference in the results. How many different frames did
you shoot? Burning an entire roll of 35mm film on a scene
Hoo boy! That whole mockup is an absurd construct.
What's the brass wheel for? Lowering the reactor moderator rods?
And, all those dials and meters...for measuring what?
Cute for use as a Saturday morning kids movie house extra perhaps.
Immediately following a Flash Gordon clip...
keith whaley
On 16/11/04, Keith Whaley, discombobulated, unleashed:
What's the brass wheel for?
That's to steer clear of Windoze :-D
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 15:10:06 +, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I didn't get chance to see as much as I'd hoped because my companions
(aged 9, 11 and 42) snip
Bob, you should know better than to go anywhere with a 42 year old... vbg
snip Thought for the day: Bob, why can't you
Photo Net doesn't sell your images. Of course they can be downloaded by anyone
who so chooses. But I don't loose any sleep over someone using my Photo Net
photos. I just make sure that some are posted with stock houses as well, so I
at least have a chance at selling some. In fact, I've had
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 07:59:20 -0500, Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's another shot from my Chicago walkaround of a couple of weeks
ago. After the Wrigley building, it's probably the most
over-photographed structure in Chicago. I tried to get a fresh
perspective by juxtaposing it
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 08:47:44 -0800, Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hoo boy! That whole mockup is an absurd construct.
What's the brass wheel for? Lowering the reactor moderator rods?
And, all those dials and meters...for measuring what?
Cute for use as a Saturday morning kids movie
It's an old joke in New England, I seem to remember seeing a similar
photo in Yankee magazine periodically.
frank theriault wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:52:14 -0800, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a silly snap, referencing something Frank mentioned a while back.
Maybe someone
Hoo boy! That whole mockup is an absurd construct.
What's the brass wheel for? Lowering the reactor moderator rods?
Nope,that s the early workings of the Hilight and Shadow tool.g
And, all those dials and meters...for measuring what?
Raw converters.g
Never thought i would see the word
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:50:59 +0100, Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OTOH, some of them are really sneaky. It includes some competitions
which are simply ripoffs. Like the Cohasset Colonials Photography
Competition, giving your picture to an advertising of some furniture
for mere 100$, and
Steve Jolly mused:
Herb Chong wrote:
i see someone rehashing the same photographic subjects over and over.
Be nice. Some people would say the same thing about wildlife photography.
Or motorsports ...
And I was just thinking how uch I now like photo-net :) but then I forked
over the
$25 a year. for 100 megs of space.
The way they put it to new members was 3 megs free. I'm really watching
pennies, too
but the pics are easy to load, they look pretty presentable in thumbnail
form and there
Why, 1X of course LOL
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey nice shot Shel - what film were you using back then?
On 16/11/04, Rob Brigham, discombobulated, unleashed:
Isn't that the latest Apple Mac? runs hides...
ROTFL
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
While it's certainly amusing, this photo is a mocked-up hoax, though
it seems it might have been someone's imaginary construct of a home
computer, circa 1954!
See: http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/hoaxes/computer.asp
Joe
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 08:47:44 -0800, Keith Whaley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave mused:
[. . .]
I realize these sites give you more exposure then I'm going to get on
private web space, but it would really piss me off if I found my work used
commercially without my being credited, royalty etc.
I'd *love* it if I found my work being used commercially without
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:33:14 -0500, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank FWIW, I think it would be a far stronger image if the people on the
far LH side were cropped out, maybe just crop out all to the Left of the end
of the brick wall. I don't see that they add anything to Walk Talk.
Alin Flaider mused:
[. . . .]
With regard to aperture-set-from-the-lens implementation: in manual
mode one can only check out the difference from metered exposure by
pressing the DOF lever; there is no provision for automatic setting
of the speed value like the *ist d does. Too
Rob Studdert mused:
On 16 Nov 2004 at 2:58, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Looks like you're describing an image editing program and browser. I
thought you meant improved camera software. I couldn't care less about
editing and viewing software unless it has to be used to view and edit
istDS
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:35:28 -0500, Joe Wilensky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While it's certainly amusing, this photo is a mocked-up hoax, though
it seems it might have been someone's imaginary construct of a home
computer, circa 1954!
See: http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/hoaxes/computer.asp
Just love the steering wheel, I wonder how many miles to the gallon it
was projected to have, and if you could get optional tail fins...
Cotty wrote:
On 16/11/04, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
This may produce a few grins:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/54-computer.jpg
Shel
Steve Jolly mused:
Herb Chong wrote:
i see someone rehashing the same photographic subjects over and over.
Be nice. Some people would say the same thing about wildlife photography.
Or motorsports ...
Or physicists!!!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
Joe Wilensky mused:
While it's certainly amusing, this photo is a mocked-up hoax,
Gee. And I though't they'd invented time travel :-)
The keyboard was obviously (well obviously to me, anyway :-)
an LA36 DECWriter, and they're a couple of decades post 1954.
Even to folks who weren't using
Best of Luck! It's amazing that stuff has gotten so routine. I've
read that they are trying to develop robot surgeons that will be able to
operate on the heart while its beating. The bad news is the robot will
probably want a separate fee.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington
OTOH, some of them are really sneaky. It includes some competitions
which are simply ripoffs. Like the Cohasset Colonials Photography
Competition, giving your picture to an advertising of some furniture
for mere 100$, and not even in cash, but in gift certificate! Same is
the 2005 Shaker
Rob Studdert wrote on 11/16/2004, 8:03 AM:
Nor is there any mention of improved RAW conversion which is where the
existing
program really lets Pentax users down.
But At least they've done SOMETHING with the PhotoLab UI which is
just horrible right now. Looks like we'll be able
If I wanted to even out the tonality of the sky, I'd burn in one side with a
very large, very soft brush and dodge the other side with a very large, very
soft brush.
Paul
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:52:14 -0800, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a silly snap, referencing something
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 04:04:10 -0800, Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
heh, heh...I do!
I like those horizontal nerf bars. Bumpers they are not!
And, those windshield wipers brought back memories of vacuum-operated
wipers!
The angle of the shot brought out the beastliness (size-wise) of
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 06:08:08 +0200, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
For those of you who ponder your possible visit to Israel.
http://www.webaperture.com/gallery/photos/51507
I admit that I do love my *istD.
--
Boris
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Beautiful photo, Boris!
Again, Photo.net pisses me off.
Under the old rules, a non-member (in other words, someone who
doesn't want to pay an annual fee, like me), one could post up to 99
photos in their gallery. If one went over that amount, the post would
still go through, but any of your photos could be arbitrarily
I think Photosig is pretty good.
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 November 2004 15:10
To: PDML
Subject: Photo.net Changes the Rules and a Question
Again, Photo.net pisses me off.
Under the old rules, a non-member (in other words, someone who
And what subjects might those be, Herb?
Shel
Herb Chong wrote:
i see someone rehashing the same photographic subjects over and over.
Here is another shot taken in the Pinnacles.
Pentax *istD, DA 16-45, circular polarizer, handheld:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/pinnacles_0028.htm
Comments welcome
Bruce
Hi Paul,
Your email hasn't shown up in my mail, but I saw it in the archives. That's
where I read much of the mail from the list. Based on what I read here,
numerous messages never appear on the list as I receive it.
No, I don't care for the bra at all, and there are a number of things I
don't
I like PhotoNet as well. I find it well worth the $25. I pay $350 a year for
portfolios.com, and it's not much better. If you direct potential clients to
your Photos page, it can pass as a portfolio. And, as with any web page, you
can assign your own url.
And I was just thinking how uch I
Thanks to everyone who responded on and off list about my ordeal. With the
list of pills I'm now on, Near Mint might be pushing it, Like New might be
closer. I think lovingly used with recent CLA might be the best description.
Hopefully, many years of good use left
Anyway, thanks to all for
Again, Photo.net pisses me off.
Thanks in advance for your thoughts.
cheers,
frank
Good to see your in the Christmas mood Frank.VBG
I recently signed up for Photobucket. Its free and seems to load up pretty
quick.
Jeff also uses it and i have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Photo Net doesn't sell your images. Of course they can be downloaded by
anyone who so chooses. But I don't loose any sleep over someone using my
Photo Net photos. I just make sure that some are posted with stock houses as
well, so I at least have a chance at
How much is an inch again? :-)
Half a year ago, I asked the same Q. in metric units, and questioned whether a
6Mpx file was sufficient for more than A4 output (A4= 297mm x 210mm). Cotty and
Paul Stenquist responded by sending me A3 (420mm x 297mm) prints of a selected
photo, and I must say I was
Bruce,
Nice shot.
Might I suggest a crop?
If you crop in from the left and leave only a portion of the dark corner then
you have a nice sense of direction (upward/forward). As it is, it seems just a
little off-balance.
Sincerely,
C. Brendemuehl
'Politics is
On 16/11/04, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
As for the bra, well, no hot
rodder worth his suicide knob would consider such a thing.
I would agree on the whole - certainly wouldn't go well with my
crotchless panties.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
On 16/11/04, Bruce Dayton, discombobulated, unleashed:
Here is another shot taken in the Pinnacles.
Pentax *istD, DA 16-45, circular polarizer, handheld:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/pinnacles_0028.htm
Comments welcome
Bruce
Crap as usual. I hate you. Go away.
sobs
Cheers,
Cotty
Hello, Pentax people! :)
AF Consequently, there's no wonder we have no display of selected meter
AF mode neither in the viewfinder nor on the back LCD. Digging through
AF the menus is in order to find out what the meter mode is.
There is! LCD Panel on top shows the metering mode (page 22
On page 179, with the custom setting for using aperture ring set to
permitted and the camera in manual mode, it states that when depth of field
is checked (Preview), AE metering is switched on. Is this not what
happens when the green button on the *ist-D is depressed?
- Original Message
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:50:59 +0100
Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OTOH, some of them are really sneaky. It includes some competitions
which are simply ripoffs. Like the Cohasset Colonials Photography
Competition, giving your picture to an advertising of some furniture
for mere 100$, and
I recently made 30x40 cm (12x16 inch) from 6mp files
from a digicam (it's a 3mp super ccd interpolating to
6mp), in Raw plus Noise Ninja, 17 mb tiff file, in a
frontier machine, fuji chrystal archive paper.
They look very good. You only see a small amount of
noise at very close inspection, but
1 - 100 of 232 matches
Mail list logo
