On Aug 23, 2007, at 6:36 AM, frank theriault wrote:
Bicycling magazine once said that for the vast majority of cyclists,
losing 5 or 10 pounds from around the gut would be much cheaper and
healthier than spending $5K or $10K on a ti or CF frame to shave 5
pounds of total bike weight...
Brian
On Aug 23, 2007, at 1:09 AM, frank theriault wrote:
Steel is for freaks?
Au contraire!
Uh oh, backpedalling time. I was writing tongue-in-cheek :)
I'm been giving some thought to picking up an old steel road frame
and building it up as a singlespeed commuter. This would be much
better
Hi Jostein,
You will loose a lot of light if you use a bundle of fiber optics,
particularly if you don't prepare the ends of each fiber individually.
It will also be very defused once the light exits the fibre. There are
limitations to the angle you can bend them and a bundle will not bend
Very interesting, Rob. Thanks!
That looks indeed like some of what I had in mind. :-)
However, I think I would like to raise them on the flexibility. Their
solution is a straight ring, while I want to retain the possibility of
directing the light at will. I've been on the phone with the
Thanks David,
That was kinda cool. :-)
So you basically get a dual gooseneck setup. But if you use so little
of the flash output area, won't you lose an awful lot of light?
In principle, My idea is very similar to yours. If you add more
fibres, so that it covers a substantial part of the flash
Now that's more like it! Thanks for a healthy counter-argument, Leon! :-)
I did some experiments a couple of days ago with a set of 40 cm long,
Ø 8 mm acrylic rods (aka plexiglass) and gaffer tape. In the first
attempt i just cut the rods with a hacksaw, taped them onto the 540
flash and did
On 8/23/07, AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks David,
That was kinda cool. :-)
So you basically get a dual gooseneck setup. But if you use so little
of the flash output area, won't you lose an awful lot of light?
Probably. I just tacked them on that way because I thought they looked
Thanks Ann. Yes, it's on photo.net. It's here:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2438913
Paul
On Aug 22, 2007, at 11:40 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
I couldnt get it to come up
Have you got it on photo.net by any chance?
anyway congrats!
ann
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Thanks Bill.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cool+bananas
:-)
Cheers,
Dave
On 8/23/07, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bananas??!!
Cheers
Brian
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Hi Jostein
The cap in teh 360 powers both strobes. The second head is scavenged
from a very old Metz with a rotatable head. The strobe in the second
head is the same as the one in the 360. I bought it as a spare part
from Pentax. The original strobe did work, but I got occassional funny
On 8/23/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 22, 2007, at 9:23 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0708/07082312nikond3.asp
I presume this means the usual whinging and whining will commence for
the umpteenth time. Only US $5000 ... A bargain!
HAR.
I'm never buying anything from Nikon that has the phraseexciting new processor
My D2H did, and look were that got me.(first name bases with service:-))
Dave
On 8/23/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Digital Image Studio
Subject: OT: DPR
On 8/23/07, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23/08/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And as suspected it supports reduced image circle lenses.
The big question is where can I get a V125/2.5 in Nikon mount!
Ebay?
:-)
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Rob will get his V125/2.5 in Nikon mount from the same place he got
the V125/2.5 in Canon mount:-)).
Paul
On Aug 23, 2007, at 7:18 AM, David Savage wrote:
On 8/23/07, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23/08/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And as suspected it supports
OK - I guess that one passed me by
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
Quoting David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cool+bananas
:-)
Cheers,
Nope. They ain't being made anymore.
Cheers,
Dave
On 8/23/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob will get his V125/2.5 in Nikon mount from the same place he got
the V125/2.5 in Canon mount:-)).
Paul
On Aug 23, 2007, at 7:18 AM, David Savage wrote:
On 8/23/07, Digital Image
On 8/22/07, Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
graywolf wrote:
[...] Personally I believe the intent of the artist, good or
bad is what makes something art. [...]
My perspective is that the intent of the artist is what makes it art (or
not) /to the artist/. And what I get from it is
Another shot of my daughter Bella. Sh'es getting hard to photograph
because she's desperately interested in my camera and is fairly mobile
now, so I have to snap them quick! Anyways, all comments welcome, and
thanks for looking.
Not quite the same, Cory. For operation of the current DSLRs, the
cycle of activity starts with the mirror down, sensor initialized and
ready to go. For a Live View mode, the shutter has to be closed, the
sensor reset to the capture mode, and then the exposure cycle
started. If in continuous
On 8/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm one of ten winners in the Detroit News Dream Cruise Photo Contest. My
winning entry is a pic of my own '55 Chevy in front of a diner on Woodward.
It's been seen here before. I shot it several years ago with the 6x7 and
Pentax SMC
WOW! Very cute and nicely caught.
Jack
--- Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another shot of my daughter Bella. Sh'es getting hard to photograph
because she's desperately interested in my camera and is fairly
mobile
now, so I have to snap them quick! Anyways, all comments welcome,
and
Well I just came back from a long sunny weekend at the races in Virginia
and the LCD was nearly useless for anything but text. I tried hats,
umbrellas, dug a hole, etc. My friend is in Scotland for the summer and
she uses her LCD all the time. Maybe that British weather is useful for
something
Seriously cute.
Nicely done.
Cheers,
Dave
On 8/23/07, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another shot of my daughter Bella. Sh'es getting hard to photograph
because she's desperately interested in my camera and is fairly mobile
now, so I have to snap them quick! Anyways, all comments
On Aug 23, 2007, at 5:33 AM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
... Unless there is a physical, mechanical linkage between the mirror,
shutter, and focus motor (unlikely). ...
In Pentax DSLR cameras, the operation of the iris actuation, mirror
and shutter mechanisms are mechanically linked very tightly
I more usually need a shade to see through the optical finder of my
SLR cameras as, with glasses, light leaking around the finder in
sunny circumstances makes it harder to see the image and information
display than an LCD display using my hand as a shade. In extreme
situations, however, a
Beautiful girl, beautiful shot. Excellent framing and camera angle. If I were
to suggest anything, it would be to strive for backgrounds that are more
uniform in tonality. Although as one who has chased many roddlers trying for a
shot, I know you sometimes have to go with what you can get.
Paul
It was a facetious response to the familiar SOS.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nope. They ain't being made anymore.
Cheers,
Dave
On 8/23/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob will get his V125/2.5 in Nikon
frank theriault wrote:
On 8/22/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I doubt Bicycling Magazine said that. It makes too much sense.
They did. I haven't read Bicycling for about 10 years, but they did...
cheers,
frank
I have read precisely one copy of Bicycling.
John Francis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:20:40PM +1200, David Mann wrote:
My main trail bike is relatively heavy so it's a bit harder to get
uphill... but it's so much fun on the trails that I don't mind the
extra pain.
Most of the weight I have to lug up hills doesn't
On 8/23/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I were to suggest anything, it would be to strive for backgrounds
that are more uniform in tonality. Although as one who has chased many
roddlers trying for a shot, I know you sometimes have to go with what
you can get
Good point, I
I'd be really offended if it wasn't true. g
No KX here, but I still have my SP500 and MX. Ah, those were the days.
Av, Tv, little needle, focus. (I always used TriX so ASA wasn't an
issue) Live Preview meant taking the lens cap off.
Enjoy and welcome to the list.
Rebekah [EMAIL
On 23/08/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was a facetious response to the familiar SOS.
LOL, I'm sticking around for the 645D, should be here for a while ;-)
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My Optio 330 has been on permanent loan to my dad for a few years. I
use it now and then when I want to shoot underwater pictures since I
have the UW case for it. A few months ago, my dad said that some of the
images looked weird and asked if I knew why. Looking at the images,
it may be
Thank you for the welcome. Yes, those were the days. Even my
brother's AE-1 was more interesting (and built better) than the
cameras of today. I plan on shooting a fair amount of BW with the
KX, too. How you like your SP500? I am thinking of getting a screw
mount camera...
Glen
On
Scott Loveless wrote:
If you want a real workout go get yourself a trailer
and borrow a couple of the neighbors' kids.
Or go trail riding with a 4 year old on the back of the bike... The
park near my house has some steep climbs with roots, rocks and various
obstacles. Last summer I had
I know.
Cheers,
Dave
On 8/23/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was a facetious response to the familiar SOS.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nope. They ain't being made anymore.
Cheers,
Dave
On
David Mann wrote:
It's dangerous having a spare bike hook in the garage though; it's
like having an empty compartment in your camera bag!
I have no garage but the bike bug has definitely hit. I'm going to
rebuild the old steel Takara, and I find myself checking eBay and
craigslist for
From:
Christian
My Optio 330 has been on permanent loan to my dad for a few years. I
use it now and then when I want to shoot underwater pictures since I
have the UW case for it. A few months ago, my dad said that some of
the images looked weird and asked if I knew why. Looking at the
Hi all.
Last week my 2400 was working fine. This week its printing out dark.
One print had an sRGB colour space look to it even though I'm printing
in Rgb.
For some reason, when i went to print this morning, all my settings in
print preview were changed. I reset them and printed. Same results.
I
Very nice. Another lens I can regret not buying. It's quite a bit
heavier than the primes I usually like. How does it balance on the
K10D? I was using the Tokina 80-200 f2.8 on the K10D over the weekend
and I was surprised at how good the combination felt despite the
weight.
Steve
--
PDML
On 20/08/07, Daniel J. Matyola, discombobulated, unleashed:
I did lick through and look
at them, however, and they are very well done indeed.
Dan, that's the best Freudian slip I've seen in a while. Thanks mate!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
In a message dated 8/22/2007 9:00:29 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mat Maessen wrote:
http://www.matoe.org/gallery2/v/tomatoe/roadtrip2007/IMGP1619.jpg.html
This is Fontana Dam, in NC, taken on the Monday after the GFM nature
photography weekend wrapped up. I was
Rebekah,
Fun shot and very memorable. I like the personality is shows.
Try sitting on the floor and shooting into the furniture as a background.
A single colored couch or chair can help.
Regards, Bob S.
On 8/23/07, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/23/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Besides the image is only 36x23.9mm how do they get off calling that full
frame? Its BS, Nikon will never make a full frame D-SLR. No one will ever buy
it...
Just thought I would get a jump on the rest of the posters.
David J Brooks wrote:
HAR.
I'm never buying anything from Nikon that
Just wanted to share...
developed 3 rolls of Acros and a bunch of slides this night. It's worth
to shoot at least B/W time after time, it helps to understand, how long
way digital cameras still needs to go to achieve the real photographic
quality and feeling.
Had a chance to handle Hasselblad
On 19/08/07, John Graves, discombobulated, unleashed:
I have some persistent dust on the mirror and screen of my DS. Do I
want to use the same cleaning pads fluids as recommended for the sensor?
John G.
This'll make some purists puke here, but I got fed up with dust spots on
my Darkside 1D
This idea I have to like it for it to be art is pretty damn self-centered.
The world did not exist before I was born. When I go to sleep the world
disappears. You are only a figment of my imagination. The only reason you don't
agree with me is because I am paranoid, if I weren't I would never
Then you got cheated by the seller. Rechargeable D cells are now up to 5000mah
to 15000mah (why are they still using milli-amp-hours when such capacities are
better expressed in amp-hours?), no way you will get that out of a AA cell. You
can by those collars to use AA or AAA cells in place of
On 8/23/07, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This idea I have to like it for it to be art is pretty damn self-centered.
1) I ~never~ said that one must ~like~ something for it to be art.
Indeed, one can find a piece to be repulsive and revolting, yet one
may consider it art.
2) I say that
- Original Message -
From: graywolf
Subject: Re: Conceptual photography (was - Corner Kick)
This idea I have to like it for it to be art is pretty damn self-centered.
snip
Guess what Tom, the concept of art is self-centered, the rest of your post
is pretty much unrelated drivel.
Nice gallery Mark. Thanks for sharing.
This is my fave of the bunch:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/gfm2/d702907.html
(and IMO it's a good candidate for a BW conversion)
Cheers,
Dave
On 8/23/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From the weekend's hikes on Grandfather Mountain. Mostly
David Savage wrote:
Nice gallery Mark. Thanks for sharing.
This is my fave of the bunch:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/gfm2/d702907.html
(and IMO it's a good candidate for a BW conversion)
Hey, I hadn't thought of that. I'll give it a try.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
you should have told me that. I just sold one for a good price. :)~
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/mypics/698154
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:45:01 +0100
On
I shot a wedding in Tx a few weekends ago. This is one of my favorite
pictures from the wedding.
comments are more than welcome.
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/display/9988911
I like the new pug set up a lot also.
sandy
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/mypics/698154
--
PDML
... Unless there is a physical, mechanical linkage between the mirror,
shutter, and focus motor (unlikely). ...
In Pentax DSLR cameras, the operation of the iris actuation, mirror
and shutter mechanisms are mechanically linked very tightly together.
The iris actuation system can operate as
On what system? What is your printing workflow? etc
Photoshop often seems to lose the settings at the driver level the
first time you go to the Print driver dialog from Print With Preview.
You should always check them before making a print.
Lightroom retains all the driver settings properly,
On 8/23/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like a monster, probably a great camera. Gonna buy one?
Damn, it's tempting. It has a function that tells you if you have a
level horizon, which would be great for me. :) Now all I need is 5
grand.
Amita
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
When's the 645D coming out? Will it be around $5K? Please say yes Rob.
Tom C.
From: Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: DPR Nikon D3, Full-Frame, previewed
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007
Native ISO of 200 is a little disappointing. Would have preferred 100 or
50.
Tom C.
From: Amita Guha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: DPR Nikon D3, Full-Frame, previewed
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007
And thats when this started, from the customer file
Dave
On 8/23/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PC XP home CS2.
Calibrate monitor with Syder I.
Adjust photo in PSCS2
Print from Preview
Colour Adobe rgb
Let PS determine colours
Set paper profile and relative colourmatic and
Excellent setting. Offers an array of compositions, one of which you've
chosen well.
Reviewed your gallery and recognized some carousel shots seen and
comment on earlier.
Some very nice work.
Jack
--- Sandra Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I shot a wedding in Tx a few weekends ago. This is
I agree...digital cameras are still lacking. After about three years
of being manual only, I have a similar feeling in regard to AF and
AE cameras. Long live the film camera. Even in 2007, that still
sounds very peculiar to me--a film camera...
Glen
On Aug 23, 2007, at 11:01 AM, Margus
It still makes Pentax look like a 90lb weakling though and provides a FF
alternative to the Canon 5D. I expect Canon to come out with it's
replacement one of these months.
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Aug 23, 2007, at 10:03 AM, Amita Guha wrote:
Looks like a monster, probably a great camera. Gonna buy one?
Damn, it's tempting. It has a function that tells you if you have a
level horizon, which would be great for me. :) Now all I need is 5
grand.
LOL ... With proper rationalization
So have you tried going back to your original reference file for the
photo, with the embedded profile, and printing from that? The
customer file was evidently stripped of any profile information,
which means you need to profile it properly and readjust it for
printing..
If you are not
I thought the rest of us greeting you yesterday were supposed to be
the grouchy old farts.
Godfrey
On Aug 23, 2007, at 10:38 AM, Glen Tortorella wrote:
I agree...digital cameras are still lacking. After about three years
of being manual only, I have a similar feeling in regard to AF and
Nice quip :-)
I have my opinions, but I am not a grouch...usually :-)
Glen
On Aug 23, 2007, at 1:38 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I thought the rest of us greeting you yesterday were supposed to be
the grouchy old farts.
Godfrey
On Aug 23, 2007, at 10:38 AM, Glen Tortorella wrote:
I
On 8/23/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 23, 2007, at 10:03 AM, Amita Guha wrote:
Damn, it's tempting. It has a function that tells you if you have a
level horizon, which would be great for me. :) Now all I need is 5
grand.
LOL ... With proper rationalization and
It does??!!!???
Tom C.
From: Norm Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: DPR Nikon D3, Full-Frame, previewed
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:21:41 -0400
Very tempting indeed, I especially like the
We all have our requirements.
Tom C.
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: DPR Nikon D3, Full-Frame, previewed
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:42:19 -0700
I'm pretty sure you'll voice
What's wrong with that? It's simply making a statement that there's a
feature or attribute that may not be to my liking. On the flip-side, there's
plenty of things to like.
Like I said, I havn't noticed so gigantic a difference in viewfinders that
it would sway me one way or another in making
Sorry, i did keep the original file, he just wanted a file to use for
a web thing, and he sent me back his adjutments.
I also went and printed several other horse photos from different
days, and they came out dark aswell. The photos them selves are nice
and crisp and sharpness is right were it
graywolf wrote:
Besides the image is only 36x23.9mm how do they get off calling that full
frame? Its BS, Nikon will never make a full frame D-SLR. No one will ever buy
it...
Just thought I would get a jump on the rest of the posters.
He, he.
Personally I was going to say that
Thanks to all who commented - your insights will help my decision making
when I start shopping.
-p
Paul Sorenson wrote:
It seems my CRT monitor is about to bite the dust - it's starting to
exhibit keystoning so I suspect the yoke is becoming a problem. If I
were to consider an LCD, what
On 8/23/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Viewfinder
aside, they are a standout in astrophotography circles, with the most bang
for the buck of any DSLR.
Tom, why are the Digital Rebels good for astrophotography? I thought
mechanical shutters were still the best thing for astrophotography.
On 8/23/07, Glen Tortorella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice quip :-)
I have my opinions, but I am not a grouch...usually :-)
Glen
On Aug 23, 2007, at 1:38 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I thought the rest of us greeting you yesterday were supposed to be
the grouchy old farts.
I'm grouchy,
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Hello,
I am a new member--just joined today.
Welcome.
I currently own a Pentax ZX-
M. I bought it three years ago, and, at the time, I was not sure if
I would like fully manual operation. I like the ZX-M so much that it
inspired me to purchase the classic I
The main thing is their extremely low noise characteristics. Noise will
build up in any sensor of course, but of all the DSLR's out there, the
Digital Rebels and the 5D are recognized as the best. There's also hardware
(filter mods) and control software that's been written for them
On Aug 23, 2007, at 11:23 AM, Amita Guha wrote:
Funny you should mention it, I put my remaining 3 manual Pentaxes up
on ebay this week. My K1000 is at $6.50 right now, so I'm almost
there. ;)
:-)
I agree with Tom that the lack of real ISO 100 is a disappointment,
although I rarely shoot
It's just not *wanting* to use the filters, or use them as little as
possible. You start stacking filters and using small apertures and the view
through the viewfinder is too dark to use. :-)
Tom C.
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To:
I should have said the best for this application at a reasonable price.
Tom C.
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: DPR Nikon D3, Full-Frame, previewed
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:02:26 -0600
The main thing is their
Let me guess, it's better than Canon.
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 23/08/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kenny already has his initial review up.
Genuine ROTLFMAO, thanks for that!
--
Remember, it’s pillage then burn.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Aug 23, 2007, at 11:58 AM, Rebekah wrote:
I thought the rest of us greeting you yesterday were supposed
to be
the grouchy old farts.
Nice quip :-)
I have my opinions, but I am not a grouch...usually :-)
I'm grouchy, and stubbornly opinionated, but still young.
And of course, long
But as I said, I can't get a long enough exposure time to do the job
I want with much greater than ISO 3.
I don't stack filters, I have a 6 and an 8 stop ND. I fit them when I
need them... after focusing and with the camera set up on a tripod.
Long as I'm going to that effort for a shot, it
FTM, I don't suppose the 100 ISO would be missed in a full frame sensor
with only 12MP. Still, I'd feel deprived. :(
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It still makes Pentax look like a 90lb weakling though and provides a
FF
alternative to the Canon 5D. I expect Canon to come out with
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: FIND
I just play a grouchy old fart for the PDML. In person, I'm just
sweetness and light... ]'-)
Same here. Except I play the part of the nasty troll.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: FIND
I thought the rest of us greeting you yesterday were supposed to be
the grouchy old farts.
He's pushing his luck already, isn't he?
William Robb
How does that make him different from the
Rebekah wrote:
I'm grouchy, and stubbornly opinionated, but still young.
And of course, long live film, especially Kodachrome.
rg2
When/if you get a scanner and figure out how to scan Kodachrome, would
please, please let me know? Thanks.
--
Scott Loveless
At least she's not your new mother...
Sandra Hermann wrote:
I shot a wedding in Tx a few weekends ago. This is one of my favorite
pictures from the wedding.
comments are more than welcome.
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/display/9988911
I like the new pug set up a lot also.
sandy
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: OT: DPR Nikon D3, Full-Frame, previewed
It still makes Pentax look like a 90lb weakling though and provides a FF
alternative to the Canon 5D. I expect Canon to come out with it's
replacement one of these months.
Pentax is a 90lb
Toralf Lund wrote:
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Hello,
I am a new member--just joined today.
Welcome.
I currently own a Pentax ZX-
M. I bought it three years ago, and, at the time, I was not sure if
I would like fully manual operation. I like the ZX-M so much that it
Thanks! How long can you keep the shutter open on these cameras? Don't
the electronic shutters burn out eventually if you keep them open for
too long?
Amita
On 8/23/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I should have said the best for this application at a reasonable price.
Tom C.
From: Tom
Sandra Hermann wrote:
I shot a wedding in Tx a few weekends ago. This is one of my favorite
pictures from the wedding.
comments are more than welcome.
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/display/9988911
I read your message, clicked the linky thing, and thought WTF? That's
not in black
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: FIND
I thought the rest of us greeting you yesterday were supposed to be
the grouchy old farts.
He's pushing his luck already, isn't he?
William Robb
On Aug 23, 2007, at 10:38 AM, Glen Tortorella wrote:
I agree...digital
Thank you for the welcome.
That is okay, as I am sure that all of us have a camera or two in
mind. There are at least one or two other Pentax models that I would
like to have.
Glen
On Aug 23, 2007, at 2:41 PM, Toralf Lund wrote:
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Hello,
I am a new member--just
Tom C wrote:
Native ISO of 200 is a little disappointing. Would have preferred 100
or
50.
From looking at the specs, I'd say it's probably more of a
sports/action camera - a competitor for the Canon 1D rather than 1Ds.
And putting only 12 megapixels in full-frame sensor should
We're talking relatively short exposure times. Frequently and often under 10
minutes. Depending on the subject and the setup, maybe not open for even a
minute. The art is such that multiple exposures are digitally stacked and
aligned so that luminance builds up, for example, 20 3-minutes
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I just play a grouchy old fart for the PDML. In person, I'm just
sweetness and light... ]'-)
Let me introduce myself: My name is Brad Dobo...
;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks for the help. :) I recently bought an old Nikon FA just in case
I ever get to do star trails again - sounds like film is still the way
to go for this sort of thing until I get rich or develop enough
patience to do the kind of thing you're talking about. :)
Amita
On 8/23/07, Tom C [EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: Glen Tortorella
Subject: Re: Just Bought a KX
Thank you for the welcome.
That is okay, as I am sure that all of us have a camera or two in
mind. There are at least one or two other Pentax models that I would
like to have.
Which would they be?
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
