Thanks!
Downloaded it already. Will play with it later today at home...
Boris
On 11/8/2010 9:45 AM, SV Hovland wrote:
You can use this, http://download.heime.org/sfk/IMGP0158.DNG
I took it specifically for testing how clipping is handled and to see how much
information there is in the dark
On 11/8/2010 9:44 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
One area where I see increased Dynamic range to be useful for me is
photographing bands where one band member will be in bright light,
and another will be in shadows. With two more stops of dynamic range,
I have a better chance of making both musicians
Idealy, a raw talen by both k7 ans k5 with exact same exposure and if
possible Lens would be perfect.
2010/11/8, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com:
Well, the only visible and major difference in spec is DR. May be what I
should do is simply ask Paul and Bob S and others who have K-5 shoot for
It may havé indeed.
It is thé first Time I do such shooting so it is probably quite bad
compared to what I'll acheive with experience.
I'm waiting for Ralf verdict ;)
Other shots are better but how Am I gonna PP those I dunno yet.
2010/11/8, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com:
Hmm... Oddly it
Thanks, Paul and Dave. She sure is (growing up fast).
On 11/6/2010 10:24 AM, paul stenquist wrote:
Nice pics of Galia. She's growing up fast!
Paul
On Nov 6, 2010, at 2:36 AM, David Mann wrote:
On Nov 6, 2010, at 6:14 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm waiting for Ralf verdict ;)
Other shots are better but how Am I gonna PP those I dunno yet.
Technically, it's as OK as a single exposure of such a scene can be. And
no, I don't see any sharpness/tripod probs.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG
Thanks, Dave.
On 11/6/2010 2:30 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
A nice series. Looks yummy
Dave
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Boris Libermanbori...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/11/peso-2010-48-pizza.html
Cheers!
:-)
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Well, this pizza was made from wholesome wheat so that it wasn't
entirely anti-diet :-).
On 11/6/2010 3:28 PM, Walter Hamler wrote:
Dang, now I'm hungry again!! There goes my diet..
Nice shots of a cute kid :-)
Walt
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Boris Libermanbori...@gmail.com wrote:
It is unfortunate that I did not bring her to Chicago, but may be next
time there is a gathering she'll accompany her father...
On 11/6/2010 3:48 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
Sweet, sweet, sweet. She's really cute, Boris. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message - From: Boris Liberman
Thanks, Richard!
On 11/6/2010 7:29 PM, Richard D Bush wrote:
You have a beautiful young daughter. I wish I had someone like her to
make pizzas for me.
RB
On Nov 5, 2010, at 11:14 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/11/peso-2010-48-pizza.html
Cheers!
:-)
2010/11/8 Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com:
Indeed she is. Having been acquainted with a number of PDMLers in person
make her even more eligible...
how are her fancy language skills then? PDML has a vacancy to fill ]=)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
It's good that the K-7 meets your needs. It meets mine as well for the most
part. But you don't need a 300% enlargement to see the advantages on the K-5 in
low light. While those are due only in part to the dynamic range, they are very
real advantages that are easy to see even in web sized
On 11/8/2010 1:52 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
It's good that the K-7 meets your needs. It meets mine as well for
the most part. But you don't need a 300% enlargement to see the
advantages on the K-5 in low light. While those are due only in part
to the dynamic range, they are very real advantages
On Nov 8, 2010, at 2:03 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Well, the only visible and major difference in spec is DR. May be what I
should do is simply ask Paul and Bob S and others who have K-5 shoot for me a
scene in bright daylight with assortment of shadows and send me the RAW file
(DNG). I
Thanks Boris and Bob.
Yes, Grace has a watch as well but doesn't wear it. She's far too young for
that. But a phone? I'm sure she thinks she's ready:-). But she won't be getting
one for a long time.
Paul
On Nov 8, 2010, at 2:30 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Excellent! And that pumpkin?! in the
On Nov 8, 2010, at 6:57 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
On 11/8/2010 1:52 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
It's good that the K-7 meets your needs. It meets mine as well for
the most part. But you don't need a 300% enlargement to see the
advantages on the K-5 in low light. While those are due only in
On 11/8/2010 2:16 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
That would still be somewhat apples to oranges, since they would be
different photos. But when I have time, perhaps tonight, I will
record the same image with both cameras at high ISO in low light.
I'd surely appreciate that, Paul.
Boris
--
PDML
Very nice, Dario. The girls appear to be carefully considering the message.
Paul
On 11/7/2010 7:08 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Lasse's FB link reminded me of this picture, shot on Hohenzollern Bridge
in Cologne. Pity the writing is not true to Dylan's song, but here we
go:
That's because Galia probably thinks the K10D is a wonderful camera
and it loves her in return. Either that or her eyes are better. ;-)
Yesterday I processed some of the Galia's photos from K10D. I find it
very hard to let it go and as well I might keep it anyway. It is
impossible to put
And thus ends another tragic period in Ralf's life. ;-) Congrats.
2010/11/7 Ralf R. Radermacher fotor...@gmx.de:
P.S.: le K-7 est vendu.
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
Blog : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com
Audio :
I kind of like the FOV. It seems to really emphasize the message
without completely marginalizing the girls.
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:19 AM, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Very nice, Dario. The girls appear to be carefully considering the message.
Paul
On 11/7/2010 7:08 PM,
Haha -- sooner than you think! Interestingly, when it happens, you'll
find that chatting is not its primary function...
http://bit.ly/bi6vyN
:)
-c
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 8:55 PM, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Before she wants one of her own?
definitely the color one. You might have the best of bought worlds by
desaturating the surroundings a bit.
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Nov 7, 2010, at 4:20 AM, frank theriault wrote:
This didn't work in BW - or at least I haven't found the right
On 7/11/10, Theodore Beilby, discombobulated, unleashed:
Diane was diagnosed with breast cancer and
underwent surgery on the 21st. I have been her nurse/servant so that
has kept
me busy. The margins of her lumpectomy were clear as well as the lymph
node that
the surgeon removed. She is now
DxO has tested the D7000:
http://www.dslrmagazine.com/pruebas/pruebas-tecnicas/nikon-d7000-sensor-raw.html
And the K-5 gets an slight advantage thanks to its ISO 80 setting, not present
in the D7000.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Thanks, Boris. I wasn't really referring so much to the pano crop, but,
instead, the space back of the bird. I always feel more comfortable with there
being somewhat more frame space in the direction a subject is either facing (as
in this case) or, especially, in the direction of movement.
I use Softpress Freeway. WYSIWYG. Based on a Quark-like interface.
http://www.softpress.com/
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Just now saw this, Boris. She's a photogenic treasure.
Jack
--- On Mon, 11/8/10, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Boris PESO #48 - Pizza
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Monday, November 8, 2010, 1:14 AM
Thanks,
On 8 November 2010 08:26, Jaume Lahuerta jlah...@yahoo.com wrote:
DxO has tested the D7000:
http://www.dslrmagazine.com/pruebas/pruebas-tecnicas/nikon-d7000-sensor-raw.html
And the K-5 gets an slight advantage thanks to its ISO 80 setting, not present
in the D7000.
I suppose it's time for me
- Mensaje original
De: Miserere miser...@gmail.com
Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Enviado: lun,8 noviembre, 2010 15:54
Asunto: Re: It's offical: K-5 is the best (D7000 tested)
On 8 November 2010 08:26, Jaume Lahuerta jlah...@yahoo.com wrote:
DxO has tested the
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 12:09 PM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd much rather be warned that I haven't spelled
something properly.
There is a warning for that. Wow, what a world
Dave
--
His lack of education is more than compensated for by his keenly developed
moral
I use Text Wrangler for my site, and it shows.
DAVE
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:54 AM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
On 2010-11-07 12:43 , Adam Maas wrote:
For text there is only one answer. BBEdit/textWrangler.
i use BBEdit and recommend TextWrangler too, but it's not the _only_
I don't remember pictures of her before, although I'm sure you've
posted. Another child in the spotlight, although Galia can fight
back. ;-)
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Just now saw this, Boris. She's a photogenic treasure.
Jack
--- On Mon, 11/8/10,
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
At low ISO you need a good
sensor, but at high ISO you also need great algorithms.
I thought you needed great legs.??
Dave
--M.
--
\/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A
Looks like she is on hold. Tell Grace to get used to it.;-)
Dave
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 8:55 PM, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Before she wants one of her own?
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11915816
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 8 November 2010 10:12, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
At low ISO you need a good
sensor, but at high ISO you also need great algorithms.
I thought you needed great legs.??
Dave
I already have those.
--M.
Oh, here you totally misread the picture, Steve. I am posting pictures
from my family album extremely rarely. Really just few times a year if
not less. I often post pictures that Galia took, but not those where she
appears.
On 11/8/2010 5:11 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
I don't remember
On 8 November 2010 10:06, Jaume Lahuerta jlah...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks Miserere, this is what I call 'team work'...
Team España ;-)
Regarding the Sony A55...May its results be affected by the mirror preventing
part of the light from reaching the sensor?
Hmmm...that's a good question.
On 8 November 2010 00:49, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
Yesterday I processed some of the Galia's photos from K10D. I find it very
hard to let it go and as well I might keep it anyway. It is impossible to
put into words, but if Galia manages to hit it, it looks so much more
pleasant
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 November 2010 08:26, Jaume Lahuerta jlah...@yahoo.com wrote:
DxO has tested the D7000:
http://www.dslrmagazine.com/pruebas/pruebas-tecnicas/nikon-d7000-sensor-raw.html
And the K-5 gets an slight advantage thanks to its
Another stunning portrait, Paul
Dan
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 8:55 PM, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Before she wants one of her own?
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11915816
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
According to DxO, K-7 has bigger sensor than D7000. The crop factors are
1.52 vs 1.53 respectively...
*Evil grin*
On 11/8/2010 3:26 PM, Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
DxO has tested the D7000:
http://www.dslrmagazine.com/pruebas/pruebas-tecnicas/nikon-d7000-sensor-raw.html
And the K-5 gets an slight
Thanks Dan.
She was talking to her father in Scotland. That's a delicate issue
around here given our previous legal battles with him, but we
encourage her to stay in touch. It's hard to get her to spend more
than a couple minutes talking to him. I doubt that she understands
much of what
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
According to DxO, K-7 has bigger sensor than D7000. The crop factors are
1.52 vs 1.53 respectively...
*Evil grin*
I'm guessing that you are not serious, but isn't the crop factor due
to a *combination* of the sensor size
Thanks to all of you who replied to this email post. Most if not all of these
programs have a free trial period, so I'm going to download a heap of them and
see which has the look and feel I am most comfortable with.
Thanks again!
Jeffery
On Nov 7, 2010, at 10:05 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On 8/11/10, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
but if I'm
going to buy a K-5
Hey money-bags, and the X100 right? ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On 8 November 2010 12:01, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 8/11/10, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
but if I'm
going to buy a K-5
Hey money-bags, and the X100 right? ;-)
Argh! Don't remind me! So much gear...so little money...
--M.
--
\/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 10:15:58AM -0600, CheekyGeek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
According to DxO, K-7 has bigger sensor than D7000. The crop factors are
1.52 vs 1.53 respectively...
*Evil grin*
I'm guessing that you are not serious,
On 11/8/2010 11:15 AM, CheekyGeek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Boris Libermanbori...@gmail.com wrote:
According to DxO, K-7 has bigger sensor than D7000. The crop factors are
1.52 vs 1.53 respectively...
*Evil grin*
I'm guessing that you are not serious, but isn't the crop factor
Oh, of course I am not being serious. I am thinking however that this
web site, which is looked up and looked at by great many people and
which is striving to be most well known could be more attentive to the
small details such as this. It should be 1.53 and most likely it is
yet another minor
CheekyGeek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
According to DxO, K-7 has bigger sensor than D7000. The crop factors are
1.52 vs 1.53 respectively...
*Evil grin*
I'm guessing that you are not serious, but isn't the crop factor due
to a *combination*
- Mensaje original
De: John Francis jo...@panix.com
Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Enviado: lun,8 noviembre, 2010 18:23
Asunto: Re: It's offical: K-5 is the best (D7000 tested)
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 10:15:58AM -0600, CheekyGeek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at
It is a wonderment.
On 11/8/2010 10:10 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
I use Text Wrangler for my site, and it shows.
DAVE
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:54 AM, steve harleyp...@paper-ape.com wrote:
On 2010-11-07 12:43 , Adam Maas wrote:
For text there is only one answer. BBEdit/textWrangler.
i use
I'm not entirely sure that the K-5 D7000 and Alpha 55 actually use the
/exact/ same sensor. Not only do they seem to have different frame
sizes, and pixel counts, (which could be accounted for in the three
manufactures implementations, but they also have different Pixel
pitches. That seems
Another time traveler, in a 1940 photo, with modern sun glasses and a
modern compact camera:
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_VSQaMHhvm20/SeJcy-yRNII/BIU/nIiN_MGMqc0/s1600-h/Hipster+1940.jpg
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread553942/pg1
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 4 November 2010 15:03, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
From a post by Kerrick James on the DP Review Pentax forum:
For those of you interested in the 645D and the K-5, I am presenting
a show called 'SOUTHWEST SOJOURNS' twice at W B Hunts in Boston this
Friday from 4-6 PM and
In case anyone is interested in what the green imaging looks like when taking a
daylight shot. In daylight. This is a screen capture from Lightroom. Check
out the weird histogram!
http://charles.robinsontwins.org/photos/2010/green_image_k7.jpg
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson -
Well, he seems deeply disappointed ;-)
It must be nice for a long time 6x7 shooter to have something
approaching a digital equivalent to what he's used too. I loved the
phrase expedition grade field camera.
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 November 2010
Charles Robinson wrote:
In case anyone is interested in what the green imaging looks like when taking a
daylight shot. In daylight. This is a screen capture from Lightroom. Check
out the weird histogram!
http://charles.robinsontwins.org/photos/2010/green_image_k7.jpg
-Charles
--
Charles
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Another time traveler, in a 1940 photo, with modern sun glasses and a
modern compact camera:
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_VSQaMHhvm20/SeJcy-yRNII/BIU/nIiN_MGMqc0/s1600-h/Hipster+1940.jpg
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread553942/pg1
not such a good
I use Softpress Freeway. WYSIWYG. Based on a Quark-like interface.
http://www.softpress.com/
be careful how you use that - it's really difficult to get quark-gluon
plasma stains out of the carpet.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-11711228
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I'd much rather be warned that I haven't spelled something properly.
There is a warning for that. Wow, what a world
Do you mean wordl?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Wow. That's plain old broken.
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
Charles Robinson wrote:
In case anyone is interested in what the green imaging looks like when
taking a daylight shot. In daylight. This is a screen capture from
Lightroom. Check out the
Actually, it's not photoshop. The image appears to be genuine, but
everything in it really could have been there at the time:
http://forgetomori.com/2010/fortean/time-traveler-caught-in-museum-photo/
Dan
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Ann
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 12:19:28PM -0600, Charles Robinson wrote:
In case anyone is interested in what the green imaging looks like when taking
a daylight shot. In daylight. This is a screen capture from Lightroom.
Check out the weird histogram!
http://www.thrane.name/page3/page7/files/page7-1000-full.html
K20D, da*50-...@80mm, 1/180s, f/13, ISO200
DagT
http://www.thrane.name/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
On 8 November 2010 13:30, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, he seems deeply disappointed ;-)
It must be nice for a long time 6x7 shooter to have something
approaching a digital equivalent to what he's used too. I loved the
phrase expedition grade field camera.
He's obviously
On Nov 8, 2010, at 13:54, John Francis wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 12:19:28PM -0600, Charles Robinson wrote:
In case anyone is interested in what the green imaging looks like when
taking a daylight shot. In daylight. This is a screen capture from
Lightroom. Check out the weird
Save this, DagT! Truly terrific. Congrats!
Jack
--- On Mon, 11/8/10, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
From: DagT li...@thrane.name
Subject: PAW44 - Bug
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Monday, November 8, 2010, 11:56 AM
A very neat shot. Nice catch.
-Original Message-
From: DagT li...@thrane.name
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 20:56:49
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PAW44 - Bug
The best endorsements come from those who actually like the product. For an
outdoor photographer this has to be a great camera.
-Original Message-
From: Miserere miser...@gmail.com
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 14:59:19
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
The true iso values are different as well, Pentax bing a lot closer to
advertised iso values.
Cheating that way (yes Pentax does as well) is a way to get more DR at
a given advertised iso value.
I hate this behaviour !
2010/11/8, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com:
I'm not entirely sure
Intriguing and effective; well seen and brilliantly captured.
Dan
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:56 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
http://www.thrane.name/page3/page7/files/page7-1000-full.html
K20D, da*50-...@80mm, 1/180s, f/13, ISO200
DagT
That's just very very clever. Sometimes I just want to make a
photograph and can't find anything to shoot. You're becoming an
inspiration. You make great photos out of nothing. (Oh by the way I
really hate you).
On 11/8/2010 2:56 PM, DagT wrote:
Hanging on for dear life?
Jeffery
On Nov 8, 2010, at 1:56 PM, DagT wrote:
http://www.thrane.name/page3/page7/files/page7-1000-full.html
K20D, da*50-...@80mm, 1/180s, f/13, ISO200
DagT
http://www.thrane.name/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I was shooting an event last night, and ran into a problem with my FA
43mm limited. It wouldn't register a focus lock at medium distances
~15ft on the K20. So I'd switch to manual focus, and the focus hexagon
burned bright and steady, without any focus adjustment. Seems weird.
Now I've
Try it again. Is the problem repeatable? Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:16 PM, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
I was shooting an event last night, and ran into a problem with my FA 43mm
limited. It wouldn't register a focus lock at medium distances ~15ft on the
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11919975size=lg
Comments, and critiques welcome.
Shot today with the K-5 DA 60-250/4 zoom
ISO 200, 250mm f4.0 @ 1/320
Beautiful day here...
Regards, Bob S.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:20 AM, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
I might build something like that. But the
target on the floor works.
Great, now i have to build a floor.
Dave
Paul
On Nov 7, 2010, at 7:03 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 9:42 PM, paul stenquist
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
I kind of like the FOV. It seems to really emphasize the message
without completely marginalizing the girls.
I agree.
Dave
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:19 AM, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
wrote:
Very nice,
It was repeatable all night, (he said stupidly), I'll have to go
someplace of roughly the same size and lighting levels to try again.
Probably tomorrow.
On 11/8/2010 4:42 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Try it again. Is the problem repeatable? Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:16 PM, P.
Love it
dAVE
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:56 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
http://www.thrane.name/page3/page7/files/page7-1000-full.html
K20D, da*50-...@80mm, 1/180s, f/13, ISO200
DagT
http://www.thrane.name/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Pretty
Dave
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11919975size=lg
Comments, and critiques welcome.
Shot today with the K-5 DA 60-250/4 zoom
ISO 200, 250mm f4.0 @ 1/320
Beautiful day here...
Regards, Bob S.
--
On 8/11/10, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
For those that couldn't make it to the seminar, here is a publicity
video for the 645D featuring John Carlson and Kerrick:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrseh35DZis
Nice to see a good quality video for a change - well made. Makes me want
a
I'd mess with it again, try to reproduce the effect on a different
day, maybe on a different camera. Then I'd get depressed and sens it
in.
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:59 PM, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
It was repeatable all night, (he said stupidly), I'll have to go someplace
Boris asked me to provide a direct comparison. So here it is. One pic
each of the same scene from each camera, shot off a tripod with the
DA* 16-50 at f5.6, 1/60th. (Both meters agreed on that exposure.) The
FOV varies slightly, because I turned the zoom ring a bit when
removing the lens
Not to get silly about this, but it's an effective video. James comes
across as a serious mature photographer. He presents the 645D as big
and solid in all the important ways, not tricks and features. A
serious camera for serious work, and he makes that camera look so nice
to use. For all I
That noise right at the top is most telling to me. At least I found
it the easiest to see scrolling up and down on my Mac, My reaction:
the K5 shot is clearly better but the K7 shot is OK. I'm surprise the
difference is not more extreme, given what I've been reading.
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at
On Nov 8, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
That noise right at the top is most telling to me. At least I found
it the easiest to see scrolling up and down on my Mac, My reaction:
the K5 shot is clearly better but the K7 shot is OK. I'm surprise the
difference is not more
On Nov 8, 2010, at 5:58 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Nov 8, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
That noise right at the top is most telling to me. At least I found
it the easiest to see scrolling up and down on my Mac, My reaction:
the K5 shot is clearly better but the K7 shot is OK.
I can't afford a 645D either. I think I adopt that position as well.
No question the K5 is better. Still, with a little cleanup the K7
will produce a usable image. Of course, the K5 might produce a near
perfect image.
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On
P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Boris asked me to provide a direct comparison. So here it is.
The tabletop looks horribly grainy.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
Blog : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com
Audio :
P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
It's true: the K-7 is not horrible at 6400. I've said that before, and
I've sot with it at that ISO. But the K-5 is close to noise free. Look
also at the side of the freezer -- the white object to the far right
-- and the ceiling tiles above. Note
Looking at the photos, while not noiseless to my eye, the K-5 noise
patterns are clearly less obtrusive, so much more controlled than the
K-7 that I'm now clearly glad that I decided to skip that generation of
DSLR and wait for the next. Well I guess the next generation is here
and I'll have
It does doesn't it.
On 11/8/2010 6:15 PM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
P N Stenquistpnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Boris asked me to provide a direct comparison. So here it is.
The tabletop looks horribly grainy.
Ralf
--
His lack of education is more than compensated for by his keenly
On Nov 8, 2010, at 6:15 PM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Boris asked me to provide a direct comparison. So here it is.
The tabletop looks horribly grainy.
Yes, it was solid color:-). Seriously, the tonality of the tabletop
is near perfect in
I'm surprised that Paul would buy a table that grainy.
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:18 PM, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
It does doesn't it.
On 11/8/2010 6:15 PM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
P N Stenquistpnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Boris asked me to provide a direct
Lol..
Jack
--- On Mon, 11/8/10, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
From: P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: K-5, K-7, side-by-side at ISO 6400
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Monday, November 8, 2010, 3:16 PM
Looking at the photos, while not
Even though slightly less contrast, the K-5 offers an image willing to allow
ones PP preferences without first dealing with the K-7's more limited DR.
The dark counter behind the table is the first area that caught my eye and gave
the margin comfortably to the K-5.
Thanks very much, Paul. Nice
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:25 PM, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Boris asked me to provide a direct comparison. So here it is. One pic each
of the same scene from each camera, shot off a tripod with the DA* 16-50 at
f5.6, 1/60th. (Both meters agreed on that exposure.) The FOV varies
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
