Op Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:00:53 +0200 schreef Kostas Kavoussanakis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Op Tue, 08 Aug 2006 02:44:00 +0200 schreef Adam Maas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Try it on any of the double-digit MZ/ZX models like the MZ-60 and 70.
I think you mean
Op Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:53:39 +0200 schreef Kostas Kavoussanakis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
You can add positive exposure compensation or lower the ISO as you
close down. If you do either, the camera will meter and expose
correctly.
The hard part
Op Tue, 08 Aug 2006 22:56:44 +0200 schreef graywolf
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I almost did that, luckily I thought a moment before posting. MTBF, and
MTTF are not the same thing. MTBF is Mean Time Before Failure which is
the average time before needing repair. MTTF is Mean Time until Total
Failure
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 03:01:20 +0200, Aaron Reynolds
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just learned something about it that pretty much seals the deal
-- I'll be buying it if I have to sell a kidney to do it. It addresses
my most basic complaint about digital. It's a feature that's so much
of a
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:32:54 +0200, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brilliant in the sense that it was guaranteed to evoke wild speculation. I
mean: 'no-brainer', 'fore-head slapping', yet good enough to step out of
the Brotherhood...
I hope Aaron is enjoying himself :o)
I thought it was a
Op Wed, 16 Aug 2006 02:06:36 +0200 schreef Bob Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Does anybody make a digital for lefties?
A friend at the office survived a terrible car accident, but
with permanent damage to his right side.
He can't even hold a PS camera with his right hand.
And using the left
Op Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:09:03 +0200 schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Oops
I didn't get further than the Super A yet, but I like this discussion
anyway, so forgive my ignorence...
The Super A can do double exposures as well :o)
Van: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Op Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:35:27 +0200 schreef Marco Alpert [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm not much into guessing games,
Yeah, right :o)
but for those who are, I noticed
this post from Aaron earlier today:
On Aug 16, 2006, at 6:01 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
If you shoot RAW you'll probably want
Op Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:32:57 +0200 schreef Keith McGuinness
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
David Savage wrote:
You've got 3 days (4 in some places) to get your Juxtaposition entry
in.
I have to admit I'm struggling with this one.
I'm struggling too, big time!
I hereby submit a disclaimer in
Op Thu, 17 Aug 2006 09:38:20 +0200 schreef Anthony Farr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thinking along this line, and considering that music can be compressed
with
variable bit rates so that the detail goes where it is needed and not
where
it would be wasted, could image files be saved with
Op Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:35:26 +0200 schreef Steve Sharpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
At 7:16 AM -0600 8/17/06, William Robb wrote:
You wouldn't believe how much bitching and complaining about photolabs
we used to get on list before the istD hit the market.
A decent lab is hard to find.
I wouldn't
Op Fri, 18 Aug 2006 02:34:33 +0200 schreef Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Simple solution. Put on more shifts. :-)
No, three shifts already means the factory is running 24h/day. To further
expand capacity you would have to invest in more machines, coslty in both
time and money.
From: Digital
Op Fri, 18 Aug 2006 07:09:28 +0200 schreef John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just someone who tracks the announcements a little more closely.
The original Pentax lens roadmap did, indeed, show a 50-200 zoom.
In fact it showed two of them; the 50-200/f4-5.6 we've now seen,
and a later, more
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 04:13:02 +0200, Digital Image Studio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21/08/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I always forget which one does what and hit the
wrong one every time. The R1's two wheels are both thumb wheels and
have sensible placement to make it
Op Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:13:08 +0200 schreef Doug Franklin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
22, actually. 42 is just ridiculous.
Utterly improbable.
81339605151 to one against, I'd say...
--
Regards, Lucas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Op Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:27:57 +0200 schreef DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Fra: Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Op Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:13:08 +0200 schreef Doug Franklin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
22, actually. 42 is just ridiculous.
Utterly improbable.
81339605151 to one
Op Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:36:41 +0200 schreef Thibouille
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just noted that Penax distributor is now De Beukelaer which also
I often get email, trying to sell me Penax :o)
distributres brands like Leica, Metz, Sunpak, Bronica, Tamron, Epson
etc.
They are also the distributor
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:02:02 +0200, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What have you used?
OM-1 (my fathers)
Kodak pocket instamatic (my mothers)
Pentax MZ-50 (my own :o)
Zenith XP-12 (on permanent loan)
Pentax Z-1p, MX, Super Program. Some others (Z-1, MZ-5, MZ-5n) for a short
while.
Op Sat, 31 Dec 2005 21:35:02 +0100 schreef Peter Fairweather
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
snip
No I won't be hanging on for the digital 645 Pentax. God knows what
the crop will be. Enough to turn decent wide angles into pedestrian
short telephotos, I shouldn't wonder!!
The crop is announced as 1.3.
Op Sat, 31 Dec 2005 21:58:39 +0100 schreef Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
...wise or foolish? Discuss.
Wise. Always combine hobbies, when possible :o)
I'm going skiing for the first time at the end of February. I expect the
Alps to be alive with the sound of the James Bond theme within about 5
Op Sun, 01 Jan 2006 19:11:54 +0100 schreef Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
One additional glove factor is that ski gloves have some sort of
armour over the finger tips. I don't know why, though. Anybody?
Because if you ski a lot, you wear through your fingers and
palms too quickly unless they're
Op Tue, 03 Jan 2006 23:29:11 +0100 schreef Dario Bonazza
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Rob Studdert wrote:
Although it is a different-sized CCD from what is used in a DSLR, it
is hard to imagine Pentax coming out with built-in IS on a point-'n'-
shoot and not considering it for use in a future DSLR as
Op Wed, 04 Jan 2006 02:49:43 +0100 schreef Kostas Kavoussanakis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Dario Bonazza wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0601/06010306pentax_e10.asp
Am I right that this is not an SMC lens?
Seems like it. It's not mentioned on the camera body or in the
Op Wed, 04 Jan 2006 03:13:31 +0100 schreef J. C. O'Connell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If we are going to us acronyms/abbrev. on this forum,
is KM the first two lens series by Pentax with
K mounts or Konica-Minolta?
I tought it was an early K-mount body ;-)
Oh yeah, was there ever a concensus on
Op Tue, 03 Jan 2006 22:19:41 +0100 schreef Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks Lucas - very helpful. I particularly like the idea of bw 19th
You're welcome.
century type shots - I must dig out some of Leni Riefenstahl's pre-war
ski
photos, which are great.
Now you piqued my curiosity :)
--
Op Wed, 04 Jan 2006 10:08:00 +0100 schreef mike wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
snip
It's the only place in town that does secondhand gear now, though.
Anyone else noticed that there is virtually no secondhand stock in the
shops any more?
Yes. I though it was due to ebay co, but when I
Op Wed, 04 Jan 2006 09:59:25 +0100 schreef Dario Bonazza
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've just talked to Pentax, and I've been promised some more details on
that. I'm going to post something as soon as I get it.
Oh wow. Looking forward to it.
--
Thanks, Lucas
Did they disclose the CCD shift
Did they disclose the CCD shift technology used somewhere? Pentax
patented a way to shift the CCD a while ago, using bending arms to
shift a platform with the CCD. That system would be possible on a
compact, but very hard on a SLR because the arms would be in the way
of light path to the
Op Fri, 06 Jan 2006 08:37:53 +0100 schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In a message dated 1/5/2006 4:48:35 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Or just make sure your camera shake is cantered around the nodal point
of the
lens :-)
Rob Studdert
=
I'm not really following all
Op Fri, 06 Jan 2006 05:35:20 +0100 schreef Cesar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Okay, I admit not being caught up to the list, but I did need to
interject and tap into the collective knowledge of the list.
I have been offered the above lens - the 'famed' pancake lens. I had
been stored on a camera
Op Thu, 05 Jan 2006 13:47:49 +0100 schreef Krisjanis Linkevics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Interesting concept. I'd love to see the whole of 2005...
I don't really know how to put this but I have been engaged in what seems
today an absolutely pointless photo project. Today is the day I decide
whether
Op Fri, 06 Jan 2006 09:29:38 +0100 schreef Lucas Rijnders
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Op Fri, 06 Jan 2006 05:35:20 +0100 schreef Cesar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I do not keep up with auction sites and such, so I am asking what would
you offer the owner? I think I should take into account a cleaning
Op Fri, 06 Jan 2006 11:44:15 +0100 schreef Rob Studdert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 6 Jan 2006 at 9:29, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
The question is: why should Pentax do it: they've been making lenses
that
supply focal length and focussing distance to the body for almost twenty
years now. I've seen F
Op Fri, 06 Jan 2006 11:59:14 +0100 schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In a message dated 1/6/2006 2:11:42 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd make a user-configurable list with lens name, focal length and max.
aperture.
==
Well, that would be better, yes. And the green
Op Fri, 06 Jan 2006 13:20:52 +0100 schreef Rob Studdert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 6 Jan 2006 at 11:10, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Oh, I see the user benefit. I'm just not sure if it's a) a reasonable
expectation, and b) makes business sense. Is backward compatibility
really the USP we think
Op Tue, 10 Jan 2006 02:04:26 +0100 schreef Kostas Kavoussanakis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Cotty wrote:
Can anyone recommend a cordless digital phone system? I fancy a Philips
DECT, maybe a 617 or something? Do you have a preference? I like plain
and simple, easy to use, as few
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:32:19 +0100, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/1/06, Kevin Waterson, discombobulated, unleashed:
My decision is to do nothing, I am too close to the heat to make
a cool headed decision. I will await the trial and see what the
justice system hands out.
That is the
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:00:28 +0100, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The signs are fairly good that this thread could soon involve abortion,
guns, and the big G-guy up there, so I'm skipping orf out of it.
Nazi's, anyone?
I take back what i said earlier about chopping balls off. I'll give
Op Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:20:45 +0100 schreef Sylwester Pietrzyk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Christian wrote on 11.01.06 11:16:
There is one. It's called BSD. :-) Been running on my PCs for years.
Yes. It is almost like OSX. Almost makes a big difference - just like
in advertising of Polish beer
Op Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:39:27 +0100 schreef John Whittingham
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm not sure why anyone on this list, or any other, thinks they have
an inside line to Pentax.
Does anyone know if the FA 60-250 f4 zoom is for real or just
speculation?
The range and speed (which differ from
Op Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:53:23 +0100 schreef keith_w
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
John Forbes wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 01:32:08 -, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And for you, Tom, this is surely the answer to your prayers. A
reasonably assured future
Op Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:38:56 +0100 schreef Dario Bonazza
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It is likely the Samsung will lack a few menu items here and there
(other than the AF-S/AF-C selection). What about loading Pentax firmware
in it? Do you expect it won't be allowed by some kind of protection?
The
Op Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:19:22 +0100 schreef Dario Bonazza
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Lucas Rijnders
Did anyone else notice that the photo's leaked in December were of a
GX-1L, with a slightly different mode dial. Could there be a second
Samsung D-SLR coming soon?
I did. That will probably
Op Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:19:43 +0100 schreef John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bentley? Is that a German car?
As German as Rolls-Royce, I'd say :)
--
Regards, Lucas
Op Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:50:53 +0100 schreef Gautam Sarup
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I for one hope they are right.
I get enough of computers and digital things all day long
at work and sometimes all night too. So when I'm
free I prefer to do things analog.
Shooting film and processing it in the
Hi all,
As I mentioned previously I recently managed to buy a Z-1p for
(relatively) small change. The camera has obviously seen more use than my
Z-1, but I like the improvements/changes enough to consider keeping te
Z-1p, and selling the Z-1.
One thing bothers me, though. When using
Op Thu, 19 Jan 2006 01:26:08 +0100 schreef Gianfranco Irlanda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When using flash in (Hy)P or Av with an F or
later lens, my Z-1 and MZ-50 generally observe the 1/fl rule.
The Z-1p seems more than a stop more optimistic about what's
Op Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:46:40 +0100 schreef Jaume Lahuerta
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I have just seen this in dpreview forum:
http://konicaminolta.com/releases/2006/0119_03_01.html
Yes, sad :(
It's a bit unclear what really is going to happen: it seems KM will keep
on producing SLR's and
Op Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:10:00 +0100 schreef John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 12:40:54 -, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- Original Message - From: keith_w Subject: Re: Samsung DSLR
announced
Hi John.
Not to be contentious, but... what *is* Schneider
Op Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:02:27 +0100 schreef Mark Steele
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I bought a cheap Sirius 135mm PK-A lens on eBay, when I attempted to fit
it to my MZ-5n it jammed in a position about 30 degrees short of where
it should be. Now it won't come out. It knocks as though something has
Op Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:11:21 +0100 schreef Kostas Kavoussanakis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Gianfranco Irlanda wrote:
Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When using flash in (Hy)P or Av with an F or
later lens, my Z-1 and MZ-50 generally observe the 1/fl rule.
The Z-1p
Op Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:19:22 +0100 schreef Dario Bonazza
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Lucas Rijnders
Did anyone else notice that the photo's leaked in December were of a
GX-1L, with a slightly different mode dial. Could there be a second
Samsung D-SLR coming soon?
I did. That will probably
Op Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:52:43 +0100 schreef Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It's official:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0601/06011901konicaminoltaout.asp
Hmmm...
Wonder if Sony will introduce the same level of copy protection to lens
mounts as they do to
Op Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:35:52 +0100 schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
fra: Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Op Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:52:43 +0100 schreef Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It's official:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0601/06011901konicaminoltaout.asp
Hmmm
Op Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:35:46 +0100 schreef Kostas Kavoussanakis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
It takes two 'clicks' here: one to switch from HyP to Tv, one to change
the shutterspeed one stop. That is expected behaviour, I think? Or am I
missing your point
Op Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:50:12 +0100 schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hey troops.
I was out Sunday shooting the 16mm on the istD and PZ-1 with
BW,GASP,FILMvbg
istD seems to work as such: compose, focus, green button, shoot. Usually
need about -0.3 comp or so
which i will assume is
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:36:31 +0100, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I bought a cheap Sirius 135mm PK-A lens on eBay, when I attempted to
fit it to my MZ-5n it jammed in a position about 30 degrees short of
where it should be. Now it won't come out. It knocks as though
something
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 07:58:08 +0100, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Op Thu, 19 Jan 2006 01:26:08 +0100 schreef Gianfranco Irlanda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Furthermore, the internal flash symbol starts blinking rapidly
at focal
lenghts
Hi All,
These two might be of interest to someone here.
The reversing ring is a genuine Asahi Pentac 49mm one, in original
red-and-green box. See
http://cgi.ebay.nl/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=7583270491ssPageName=STRK:MESE:IT
The light meter is, well, a light meter. I don't think
Op Fri, 20 Jan 2006 08:12:24 +0100 schreef Paul Ewins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
snip
I had thought of putting a Nikon prism on it and then mounting my 77
limited on it to confuse Nikon shooters, but an F2 metered prism seems
to cost more than the camera is worth so I have given up on that.
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 08:30:51 +0100, Kostas Kavoussanakis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, John Forbes wrote:
As for the rest, I think you underestimate the power of your own
voice. The person who started this thread said he had read that Pentax
was in financial
Op Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:01:54 +0100 schreef Kostas Kavoussanakis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 08:30:51 +0100, Kostas Kavoussanakis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, John Forbes wrote:
read one of Herb's posts and believed
/06, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
won't abandon that strategy now and the 645D will simply be an *ist-D
with
a large sensor. It'll feature P-TTL, SAFOX VIII, the *ist's lightmeter,
etc, but no innovations that require large investments...
--
Regards, Lucas
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:39:50 +0100, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Or at least cut back investments. Herb's (and other's) problem was that
he wanted a higher spec body, one even over the *ist-D.
Herb's problem was (is) that Pentax was (is) showing no interest in
producing a DSLR
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:58:32 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone got some K-mount extension tubes for sale? Cheap?
Uncoupled is fine.
Yes. Currently for sale at
http://www.marktplaats.nl/index.php3?url=http%3A//verkopen.marktplaats.nl/useradmin/mymarktplaats.php.
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 20:17:46 +0100, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:58:32 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone got some K-mount extension tubes for sale? Cheap?
Uncoupled is fine.
Let's retry that:
Yes. Currently for sale at
http
Op Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:06:05 +0100 schreef Dario Bonazza
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
aka Samsung GX-1L, isn't it?
The 5 AF points a a giveaway, aren't they :o)
Supposedly coming in March:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=16868507
and
Op Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:35:01 +0100 schreef Sylwester Pietrzyk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Lucas Rijnders wrote on 25.01.06 9:28:
The live preview could be a killer feature, depending on how well it's
done. Bit of an odd body to introduce it in...
It's a good body for such a feature
Op Wed, 25 Jan 2006 15:49:09 +0100 schreef Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I remember a rumor that the first Pentax DSLR was going to
have LCD preview (about six months before the *ist came out). Doesn't
anyone else remember that?
So I am suspicious of
-DL2
pdf was correct we'll know today whether Pentax can counter this
immediately.
By the way, a third way would be in the light path to the AF-sensor. I
think it's feasible, but with some interesting design issues of it's own...
--
Regards, Lucas
2006/1/26, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED
Op Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:44:13 +0100 schreef Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Gang,
This is not really meant as a survey, but it would be interesting to
hear other people's preferences.
Counting exposures made in 2005, my most used lens was the D-FA 16-45/4
zoom. With a Sigma 70-200 as a good
Op Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:02:00 +0100 schreef mike wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
From: Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
To make both digicam and macro users happy. It seems no live preview is
a
showstopper for lots of digicam/prosumer users. If Pentax is smart, it
doesn't argue
Hi all,
The camera appears to be true. No mention of a (live) preview.
See http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/dslr/2006/01/26/3087.html.
--
Regards, Lucas
the sensational
pdf floating around).
Pentax site in Japan (as well as in UK, US) is silent.
But Pentax Germany isn't:
http://www.pentax.de/_de/photo/news/index.php?photonewsgruppe=news_id=142
-Not for Europe
-Not-really-live preview
--
Regards, Lucas
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 02:47:47 -0800
Lucas Rijnders
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:40:07 +0100, Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Just arrived: very nice 645n with FA 45-85/4.5! What a nice piece of pro
equipment. Too bad Pentax doesn't make something similar for K-mount...
So
now my film photos will be rather only 6x4.5 ;-)
Digital
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:32:53 +0100, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So who makes the sensor used in the Samsung Pro815?
Good question. I take it noone else could find the answer either?
--
Regards, Lucas
Op Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:13:19 +0100 schreef Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is the first time I've heard that. I can't see any difference
between
the mounts on the K and M designated lenses. Did Matanle describe the
differences?
Didn't the working of the aperture lever (from
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:29:44 +0100, E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Forbes wrote:
Perhaps we should make it more restrictive. It's the lens that
counts, not the body. Why not stipulate that the picture must have
been taken using a Pentax lens?
In a digital camera, doesn't
Hi list,
Does anyone happen to know how easy it is to remove the plastic body cover
around the lensmount on a Z-1p? The one on my Z-1p is cracked while the
one on my Z-1 is fine, so I was thinking to exchange them. However, simply
unscrewing the two screws in the prism housing wasn't
Op Wed, 01 Feb 2006 15:23:13 +0100 schreef Rick Womer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have a drowned PZ-1p body which is externally fine.
If someone can tell us how to get the cover off,
you're welcome to it.
Rick,
First, my condolances on the loss of your PZ-1p. Second: thank you very
much for the
Op Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:19:37 +0100 schreef Rick Womer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Of course there's a crack! I mended it with epoxy but
it cracked again. The only (P)Z-1/1p I have seen
without a crack is one that is brand new or freshly
repaired.
grin
Weird that Pentax didn't fix that obvious
Op Thu, 02 Feb 2006 06:08:13 +0100 schreef Scott Loveless
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Before I got an M35/2.8 from Don, I tried searching eekBay for 35mm
lenses. That sure is fun!
Tell me about it, I hunted a while for the K35/3,5. Why don't people call
the camera's 135 format, like they should
Op Fri, 03 Feb 2006 10:34:22 +0100 schreef David Savage
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 2/3/06, E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don Sanderson wrote:
Don't feel bad Scott, you have no idea how many
times I've tried to chimp when using a film body
lately! ;-)
As a sign of the times, I don't
Op Fri, 03 Feb 2006 12:29:12 +0100 schreef Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
snip
There's a listing for cult lenses somewhere on the 'net, and it provides
some good info.
That would be http://medfmt.8k.com/third/cult.html, a must read.
Jim Colwell's SplosDB lists third party lense with
Op Fri, 03 Feb 2006 13:05:08 +0100 schreef David Savage
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 2/3/06, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Op Fri, 03 Feb 2006 10:34:22 +0100 schreef David Savage
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Whats an ell pee??
Think of it as audio-film :o)
LOL
Ah yes. Prone to scratching
On Sun, 05 Feb 2006 04:40:53 +0100, Daniel J. Matyola
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A quick review of my reactions to the PUG entries for February:
Thanks for commenting.
Calatrava by Lucas Rijnders: Nice composition. I know you can't
control the weather, but it might look better
On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 20:27:45 +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The adaptation possibility for Pentax K-mount makes the possibility of
an Olympus, or Panasonic, 4/3 camera an intriguing idea. I am pretty
I'd test that before spending lots of money on it if I were you. I
On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 03:32:38 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/3/2006 6:30:19 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well...I would say it is a Python thing and that kind of insanity
transcends all boundaries.
Keith I wear high heels, suspenders and a bra McG
On Sun, 05 Feb 2006 19:41:34 +0100, Kostas Kavoussanakis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006, DagT wrote:
Den 5. feb. 2006 kl. 04.40 skrev Daniel J. Matyola:
Undone by Dag Thrane: Another one of my favorites. I love
thecolor, and I love the composition, but the needle really
On Sun, 05 Feb 2006 21:07:08 +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Feb 5, 2006, at 10:33 AM, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
The adaptation possibility for Pentax K-mount makes the possibility of
an Olympus, or Panasonic, 4/3 camera an intriguing idea. I am pretty
I'd test
On Sun, 05 Feb 2006 22:30:09 +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Feb 5, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
If the Pentax lenses I have now work well on the Pentax *ist DS (and
they do), I cannot imagine why they would work poorly on an Olympus
4/3 sensor.
I
On Sun, 05 Feb 2006 22:30:09 +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Feb 5, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
I gathered, but it is hearsay from memory, that most OM lenses are
simply not sharp enough on the 4/3's sensor. It is both smaller and
higher resolution
In a message dated 2/5/2006 10:35:52 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, I fail to see why dressing up as a woman is funny.
It's a very british thing. They quite succesfully exported it to
australia. Not sure about the rest of the commonwealth ;-)
Yeah, I've seen
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 19:24:12 +0100, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't need to compensate for the filter if using the in-camera
meter. Filter factors are only for external meters that don't meter
through the filter.
But if you do use an external meter I'd say you have to
Op Tue, 07 Feb 2006 14:55:25 +0100 schreef frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 2/6/06, Keith McGuinness [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
In the Lumberjack song, which was way back at the start of this
snip
I always thought they were making fun of Canadians.
Or weatherforecasters :o)
For
Op Tue, 07 Feb 2006 14:43:25 +0100 schreef Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've forgotten. Who is the owner/moderator for this list?
See www.pdml.net
I just got a mailbox full of those damned bounce mails from
studiogriffanti . The owner/moderator needs to unsubscribe this person!
--
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 07:26:11 +0100, Igor Roshchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if anybody has had any experience in sealing lens
barrel against water and/or dust with any type of tape/sealant.
The area of the barrel that would need to be sealed
is away from the junction between
Op Wed, 08 Feb 2006 03:36:47 +0100 schreef Bob Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I like the color shot, a lot. Regards, Bob S.
Agreed.
--
Regards, Lucas
Op Wed, 08 Feb 2006 05:31:40 +0100 schreef Juan Buhler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Also, take a look at this page:
http://flarg.com/Graphics/Bokeh.html
My friend Dan Wexler implemented realistic optical bokeh in a
computer renderer, and he has a little interactive image in that page
that helps see
Op Thu, 09 Feb 2006 14:45:15 +0100 schreef Mark Roberts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly. It's certainly not bad news. And I'm glad to have at least
some scheduling info, so I can plan accordingly.
Note that the BJP article says the *645* digital is being
301 - 400 of 573 matches
Mail list logo
