On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 08:47:24PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
On Oct 27, 2010, at 4:48 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 05:34:53PM -0600, Bran Everseeking wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:28:00 -0400
John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Why are they called THIRD
Thank you, David!
On 10/27/2010 9:11 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Well done
Dave
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Walter Gilbertldott...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
Just wanted to strut a little as I've discovered that my first submission to
the Pentax Gallery was accepted!
Hi Daniel,
It took quite a while. More than three weeks, easily. I was beginning
to give up hope when I looked that last time, in fact, and was thinking
about writing an email to the folks who run the gallery to see if I'd
done something wrong.
-- Walt
On 10/27/2010 10:06 AM, Daniel
Many thanks, Boris!
I'm frequently filled with doubts about my photography when I see the
work of others. Usually, when someone who isn't a photographer says
something nice about my work, I'm thinking about what's not so great
about the shot -- Well, it could've been better if I'd done
In this case consider the passing of time as a good thing. It indicates current
survival of the voting process and, therefor, a reason for hope.
Jack
--- On Thu, 10/28/10, Walter Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Walter Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Submission accepted
.
Jack
--- On Thu, 10/28/10, Walter Gilbertldott...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Walter Gilbertldott...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Submission accepted to Pentax Gallery
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Date: Thursday, October 28, 2010, 7:28 AM
Hi Daniel,
It took quite a while. More than
On 10/28/2010 4:32 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Many thanks, Boris!
I'm frequently filled with doubts about my photography when I see the
work of others. Usually, when someone who isn't a photographer says
something nice about my work, I'm thinking about what's not so great
about the shot -- Well,
: Submission accepted to Pentax Gallery
Hi Daniel,
It took quite a while. More than three weeks, easily. I was beginning to
give up hope when I looked that last time, in fact, and was thinking about
writing an email to the folks who run the gallery to see if I'd done
something wrong.
-- Walt
/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: Walter Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Submission accepted to Pentax Gallery
Hi Daniel,
It took quite a while. More than three weeks, easily. I was beginning to
give up hope when I looked that last time, in fact, and was thinking
/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Submission accepted to Pentax Gallery
Impressive, Ken, Especially the 5 in the Premiere Collection. I have
seen them, and they certainly extraordinary images.
I just had a photograph declined
Subject: Re: Submission accepted to Pentax Gallery
Impressive, Ken, Especially the 5 in the Premiere Collection. I have
seen them, and they certainly extraordinary images.
I just had a photograph declined after being under review for almost 6
weeks. The others I submitted at the same
Thanks again, Boris.
It is nice to have folks like you and the rest on PDML to turn to for
guidance and an honest critique. I've had some generally bad and/or
uninteresting photos get praise from people simply because they don't
want to discourage me. There's no harm in that -- and it is
From: John Francis
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 05:34:53PM -0600, Bran Everseeking wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:28:00 -0400
John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Why are they called THIRD party lenses? Shouldn't they be second
party lenses, or if not, who is the second party?
I
Well done
Dave
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Walter Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
Just wanted to strut a little as I've discovered that my first submission to
the Pentax Gallery was accepted!
Congratulations, Walter... As a matter of custom :-), I am obliged to
give you a virtual pat on a back adding to that that your work well
deserves to be accepted in the gallery.
:-)
Well done indeed.
BOris
On 10/27/2010 12:03 AM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all!
Just wanted to strut a
From: Bran Everseeking
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:03:08 -0500
Walter Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
Just wanted to strut a little as I've discovered that my first
submission to the Pentax Gallery was accepted!
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 03:28:00PM -0400, John Sessoms wrote:
Which brings up another question ...
Why are they called THIRD party lenses? Shouldn't they be second party
lenses, or if not, who is the second party?
You are.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
The first party is the seller (Pentax) of the camera; the second
party is the purchaser. Anyone else is a third party.
Dan
http://tinyurl.com/matyola
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 3:28 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: Bran Everseeking
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:03:08 -0500
Walter
Canadians may be considered fourth party? ;)
Jack
--- On Wed, 10/27/10, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Submission accepted to Pentax Gallery
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Or the frozen party.
Dan
http://tinyurl.com/matyola
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Canadians may be considered fourth party? ;)
Jack
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:28:00 -0400
John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Why are they called THIRD party lenses? Shouldn't they be second
party lenses, or if not, who is the second party?
I think we are the second party.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 05:34:53PM -0600, Bran Everseeking wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:28:00 -0400
John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Why are they called THIRD party lenses? Shouldn't they be second
party lenses, or if not, who is the second party?
I think we are the second
On Oct 27, 2010, at 4:48 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 05:34:53PM -0600, Bran Everseeking wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:28:00 -0400
John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Why are they called THIRD party lenses? Shouldn't they be second
party lenses, or if not, who is
Hi all!
Just wanted to strut a little as I've discovered that my first
submission to the Pentax Gallery was accepted!
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#section=ARTISTsubSection=10741172subSubSection=10941445language=EN
:-
I didn't think I'd be this happy about it. But, things
Very well rendered, Walter! Congrats!
Jack
--- On Tue, 10/26/10, Walter Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Walter Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com
Subject: Submission accepted to Pentax Gallery
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Tuesday, October 26, 2010, 3:03 PM
Hi all
I remember that as Peso. Nice work.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Walter Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
Just wanted to strut a little as I've discovered that my first submission to
the Pentax Gallery was accepted!
Congrats! You can now add Pentax Artist to your resume'.
Jeffery
On Oct 26, 2010, at 5:03 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all!
Just wanted to strut a little as I've discovered that my first submission to
the Pentax Gallery was accepted!
: Walter Gilbertldott...@gmail.com
Subject: Submission accepted to Pentax Gallery
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Date: Tuesday, October 26, 2010, 3:03 PM
Hi all!
Just wanted to strut a little as I've discovered that my
first submission to the Pentax Gallery was accepted!
http
Thanks, Steven!
The feedback I got on it from you guys was a big factor in my decision
to submit it. It is very much appreciated!
-- Walt
On 10/26/2010 5:16 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
I remember that as Peso. Nice work.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Walter
Thank you, Jeffery!
I don't know how much sway that'll hold with all the Nikanon and Canikon
folks, but maybe I can get a little respect from the Olympians and
Sigmatics. :-)
-- Walt
On 10/26/2010 5:27 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
Congrats! You can now add Pentax Artist to your resume'.
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:03:08 -0500
Walter Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
Just wanted to strut a little as I've discovered that my first
submission to the Pentax Gallery was accepted!
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#section=ARTISTsubSection=10741172subSubSection=10941445language=EN
Thank you, Bran!
The way I went about it was to send a request for an Artist Code to
photogall...@pentax.com. It took a while -- almost a week -- but I
finally got one. There'll be a URL in the reply that'll take you to a
page where you submit your images.
You'll want to be sure to read
Congratulations!
That is a fine image. I remember seeing it, and liking it, when you
posted it as a PESO.
Dan
http://tinyurl.com/matyola
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Walter Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
Just wanted to strut a little as I've discovered that my first
And a worthy submission it was. Congratulations.
Paul
On Oct 26, 2010, at 6:03 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all!
Just wanted to strut a little as I've discovered that my first submission to
the Pentax Gallery was accepted!
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:03 -0500, Walter Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all!
Just wanted to strut a little as I've discovered that my first
submission to the Pentax Gallery was accepted!
Thanks, Dan!
I liked the image pretty well, but was surprised at the reception it got
from the list, as well as people I showed the print to. I do tend to be
a pretty harsh critic of some of my shots -- especially after I set them
aside for a few days and look at them again. Strangely,
Thank you, Paul!
That shot is a big part of the reason I almost never go anywhere without
my camera, and carry it over my shoulder even when I just step into a
convenience store for a minute or two. I've been in that same location
(my favorite watering hole, next door) at the same time
Many thanks, Brian!
I'm pretty sure I won't get too discouraged by the inevitable
rejections. A big part of the reason that I post PESO's is simply to
make sure I'm being objective. Even when I really, really like a shot,
I tend not to trust my judgment. So, I post them here to see what
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:36:01 -0500
Walter Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
The way I went about it was to send a request for an Artist Code to
photogall...@pentax.com. It took a while -- almost a week -- but I
finally got one. There'll be a URL in the reply that'll take you to
a page
Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Walter Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Submission accepted to Pentax Gallery
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Tuesday, October 26, 2010, 6:27 PM
Thanks, Dan!
I liked the image pretty well, but was surprised at the
reception
40 matches
Mail list logo
