Cotty said,
It makes composing and capturing images a real pleasure -
not that it wasn't before, but it's somehow a more 'complete' experience.
Do you have to lay back and smoke a cigarette after you finish using it?
Len (G,D, RFC)
---
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff
come with a lifetime warranty. Should anything go
wrong with my 1963 T-Ball Jotter, Parker will stand
behind it. Pencils have no such warranty.
--
Shel Belinkoff
Yes, provided you still have your original receipt
so you can prove you purchased
-Original Message-
From: William Robb
Does Leica have a lens factory in Asia? Zeiss for sure does, the
Contax lenses are made by Kyocera if my failing memory serves me
correctly.
William Robb
-
I owned a Contax G1 and a G2 and the lenses stated Made in Japan.
The glass could have been
Bill,
If the title is Cosmic Fire the picture link is broken.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Peifer, William [OCDUS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 11:46 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Request for comments, criticism on posted image
Hi all,
If your Windows machine is a new one, check the CMOS
settings. There are settings that will power your
machine back on after you turn it off.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Tom Rittenhouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 12:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Bruce! Do you think Pentax codes more into the serial numbers than
they tell us about? Or do they start up with high numbers to confuse the
opposition about their production? I've always wondered why camera
manufacturers never seem to start at serial number 1, or 001. They could
get
Now, Norm. Don't ask logical questions like that. ;-)
Obviously, he didn't want his wife to know what was in
the package. :-)
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Norman Baugher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 8:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Delivery
But that's the great thing about Pentax. They're all
manual focus lenses if you're not using an autofocus
capable body. Not all brands of lenses that are
autofocus can be used as manual focus lenses.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Jaume Lahuerta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Mark (and Jeepgirl),
I'll bet I could walk you through it. If you
want, send me an e-mail at mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll be happy to help you.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 1:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I use the same software myself and never had a problem.
If you have a CD formatted for use in Direct CD, then you
can drag and drop pictures from any of your subdirectories
on your hard drive into any subdirectory on your CD.
The system doesn't care what the file type is. I would
be sure to put
Nope, adding anoter air/glass interface won't reduce overall
flare of any lens that I know of. Better to use a larger deeper
lens hood. Compendium hoods, like those used on medium format
cameras are probably the best.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Robert Wetmore [mailto:[EMAIL
This thread demonstrates the principle of FLDSAC.
First Liar Doesn't Stand a Chance. Grin
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 5:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Real DOF the Pentax K1000
Erik Nordin
Yeah, it lets you feel the right position in the dark, kind of like braille.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Beard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 7:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Little White Half Sphere
At 03:25 25-10-2001 -0400, Paul
I too think that was a red herring. I suspect that Phillips wants more for
the 6MP CCD than Pemtax is willing to pay. When you can buy a 5MP camera for
less that $2KUS, you aren't going to sell many 6MP cameras for $7KUS.
If Phillips drops the price on the 6MP CCD, I wouldn't be surprised to
I think your quality assessment of zoom lenses is more than just a bit
subjective. I don't believe the image quality of the lenses you listed
easily matches even the best primes as you stated. Even the best primes
includes the most stupendous prime lenses available. Zooms haven't
progressed to
Roll 1: Find the old Ritz-brand film, take 24 exposures and of course the
Pentax functions are set to Auto-rewind, do not leave leader out.
You didn't say, but I guess roll 1 was scratched too, right.
Len
---
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
I'm not Shel, but I think small and unobtrusive cameras and lenses are
essential to street photography. A large pro-looking SLR, and a honkin'
fast zoom lens tends to inhibit folks on the street a lot more than a small
rangefinder with a prime lens or a small PS (like the Yashica T4 Super).
I think that, coupled with an extensive, well kept up FAQ, this could be a
wonderful idea. Between these and Boz's K-Mount pages, and the other things
PDML members have on line, we could all benefit greatly from having a common
base of knowledge that we could refer to when neded.
Len
---
It's a littlr tough at the moment to find the book at Amazon or the
publishers site. Possibly congestion from PDML folks rushing to buy it?
ISBN search at Amazon returned no results.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Mike Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31,
For working, the 645-n, most likely.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Mike Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Which body would you BUY today?
This is not an official survey question, but after pondering
Yeah, probably, if you and others here were dealers and would commit to, and
pay for, a large enough order to get them to change their corporate mind.
Could we scrape together an order for a thousand of each focal length?
Actually, since you seem to have their attention, why not ask them how
Oh, have you written one?
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 3:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TTL multiflash with METZ
In a message dated 11/19/01 7:25:19 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't doubt it a minute. My lame little example used two identical flash
units and a neutral density filter along with a camera that had a basic TTL
flash capability that triggers both flashes at the same time and then
quenches both of them at the same time, when enough light has reached the
Tom C. said:
I find that I usually need to print more than once or twice, before I get
something decent. So it's sort of like printing everything anyway by the
time I get done. I have one of those two-year old antiquated Epson 800's.
Anybody want to make a blanket statement about how much
Hmmm, doesn't a conventional camera depreciate as well?
William Robb
---
Hardly at all if you judge by the prices folks ask for
their used equipment here on the PDML. BSEG
---
Len
---
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
Yep, that's right. A little film warpage, though it can be as much or maybe
a little more than the thickness of the emulsion(s) doesn't really cause
major decreases in sharpness.
Another point that hasn't been mentioned here (at least I haven't seen it
mentioned) is that depth of focus/field
I suspect that they only approach perfection, as a goal, but never actually
achieve it. The real world does have to be considered, ya know what I mean?
In other words, when you get close enough, you can claim victory.
To hold them to having to be perfect because they use the term APO is not
Why would you want to remove it? Does it get in the way? Or do you just
want to know how to remove it just for the sake of knowing how to remove it?
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Frank Wajer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 6:16 AM
To: pdml
Subject: how to
-Original Message-
From: Mike Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 7:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Laser Turntable OT
Man... $13,000 for the one that plays 33 and 45 rpm, and $20,000 for the
one that plays 78s as well...
If I was rich, I'd
I sure wouldn't buy one via mail order. At that price, if I wanted one, I'd
make sure I had a chance to listen to a few of my own records and I'd insist
on a trial period so I could make sure it satisfied me working in my own
environment. I guess you've actually listened to one, then? How
I don't know how my comments were stripped off the original reply but I
didn't see them. Here it is again.
I sure wouldn't buy one via mail order. At that price, if I wanted one, I'd
make sure I had a chance to listen to a few of my own records and I'd insist
on a trial period so I could make
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Laser Turntable OT
How do you do that?
Paris, Leonard wrote:
I need a turntable so I can
digitize all of my LP collection.
--
Shel Belinkoff
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Five failures in two years is plenty of justification to put the LX in a
display case and leave it there. How will you be able to trust it for
anything important?
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Mark Cassino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:12 PM
To: [EMAIL
Aye!
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Mike Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Take cover!
Okay, since opening salvos in a gathering flame war have now been fired by
both sides, I move that we, the PDML, agree
Now, if we could get together and buy a good monitor calibration package, we
could send it around and all get our monitors calibrated. Probably wouldn't
work for all of us, though. The kind I mean isn't just software but
includes a colorimeter, too.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From:
Poor example for this instance. Honda's CVCC engine has always performed
better than the U.S. automobile emissions standards. Those old 95 Civics
still meet the latest requirements with the greatest of ease. However,
other cars might be better examples of what you say. Except for my 86
Pedantic perhaps but, nevertheless, correct. P4 is correct, P-IV is
understandable, P1V is nonsense.
Keep the faith,
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Farr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 9:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Computer Upgrade
Well, if it's not a V but is the original Pentax Spotmeter, you won't be
able to get batteries for it anywhere. You'd better be sure which model it
is before you buy it.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Nuzzolillo, Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 7:23
The FA* 85mm f/1.4 is the best portrait and wedding lens in my arsenal. For
head and shoulders shots, I usually use it wide open. Most of the time, for
weddings, I work at f/5.6, except when I'm shooting in candlelight. I will
have to do some test shots to see how it performs at infinity focus
Thanks Bob. It will help a bunch. The only other meters left for me to
look at now are Minolta. We'll see.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Bob Walkden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:50 PM
To: Paris, Leonard
Subject: Re: Spotmeters, a new question
Your best bet is to take all the equipment you want to carry with you to the
store and buy the bag it all fits in to your satisfaction. That's the
method I use, and it works great. Until you just have to cram seven more
items into the bag. :-)
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Raul
If there's one thing I've learned it's that there are degrees of
hopelessly and horrible, and as many definitions of them as there are
sets of eyes in the world. In fact, I've seen pictures from hopelessly soft
lenses with horrible bokeh hanging on gallery walls. It's enough to make me
wonder
There must be some reason X-Ray techs wear lead aprons in hospitals.
Perhaps because they protect vital parts from X-Rays? If the X-Rays from
airport scanners are strong enough to pass easily through these lead bags,
there's a good chance that they are also hazardous to unprotected people.
Len
Perhaps if you get into the bag and seal it up tightly about three hours
before they dump you on the X-Ray machine conveyor belt, you won't be harmed
by the X-Rays. BSEG
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 1:39 PM
Only a few quick hints. If you were using flash, you need to bounce and/or
diffuse it. If you aren't using flash, open the lens up to its widest
aperture and adjust your shutter speed up to compensate. You could also use
a longer lens wide open (FA*85mm). Yes, a softening filter, or a piece of
Nice references. I would only add one point. When you use a STO-FEN
Omnibounce, you can get away with using an on camera flash that neither
tilts nor swivels. The Omnibounce will still soften and diffuse the light
to a large degree. I use it this way, even with tilt and swivel flashes,
when I
It's always OK to ask what the reserve is. Most sellers will tell you.
Some will not. Read all of his feedback and judge by the negatives, if any.
One or two negatives on a person with many positives may not be indicative
of a problem seller, it could well be that the buyer just thought he
I have an A series. It's a gem. Yes, the multicoating seems to be an update
from other A lenses I've had. I've often wondered why there is no FA (or
FA*) 50mm f/1.2. Perhaps a FA 48mm F/1.2 Ltd or something???
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Yeah the f/0.95. Impressive piece of glass to look at. Performance was not
great but, at the time, there was nothing faster. It looked mighty good on
the Canon 7s. I guess that body and lens combo would fetch a pretty penny
today.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Norman Baugher
Hi Valentin! Nice to know that you're still within lurking distance. Best
wishes for the holiday season and may the new year see you healthy, wealthy,
and wise.
Hmmm, Linux crash? Nah! Couldn't be. Must have been a hardware failure.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Valentin Donisa
It means the folks here on the PDML have been very busy. I seem to remember
a recent call here on the PDML to flood that site with good stuff about
Pentax. Looks like folks did.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Dan Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 10:01
Not to my knowledge. Rangefinder lenses can be wider aperture than SLR
lenses because there's no mirror box in the camera. F/1.0 is the fastest
SLR lens I've heard about. It's made by Canon, too. Very pricey.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Steven Larson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
That's all I used to shoot, in the fifties, VBSEG
Len
---
I've developed an interest in producing BW photos with a look from
the mid-20th century, and have been experimenting with film that may
contribute to that look, along with giving consideration to lenses that
may also enhance such
You might try shooting Plus X or Tri X, and developing in D76. Use the
Sunny 16 rule exclusively and, if you must use flash, FP bulbs.
Len
---
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the
I don't think anyone would design a camera or other piece of equipment to
deliberately short out the power source. As long as you meet, and don't
exceed, the required operating voltage for a piece of equipment, it's
internal resistance will limit current flow to that amount determined by
Ohm's
-Original Message-
From: Jon Hope [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 8:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AF Macro Lens Question
Snip
Snip
I found that for flowers and non moving objects the 50mm is fine. For
things that move, or things that tend
Simply put, the ZX-5n which the original poster said he was
using has a
sync of 1/100. To hand hold, 1/200th is preferable for the
200mm, and 1/180
for the 180mm.
I followed my own suggestions and checked Pentax and Boz's web pages. I was
amazed to learn that the max flash sync of the
The Gossen Luna Pro SBC is a gem of a meter for both incident and reflected
measurements and uses common 9-volt batteries. It can be purchased used for
a reasonable amount of money. It will fit in a shirt or coat pocket but
there are smaller meters.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From:
Though, strictly speaking, spotmeters are not incident light meters, you can
put an 18% grey card at the subject position and read the light reflected
from it and get pretty much the same results.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
I remember using one that looked like that in the distant past. I think it
was called a Brockwood, or something like that. I forget who made it. It
was a good meter, too.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Bob Walkden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 1:03 PM
Yeah but we got a better camera than the F90, too. I've owned both an N90s
and a PZ-1p and the PZ-1p is a whole lot better, although build quality may
be slightly less than the Nikon. Cracks in the battery cover door area kind
of piss me off about my PZ-1p. I really believe the MZ-S is pretty
Perhaps he uses the SB28 with his Nikon F5. It can be used with the other
cameras but just not TTL. The SB28 has
a sensor on the flash unit so that auto flash may be used on old and
off-brand cameras as well as TTL with Nikon cameras.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Otis Wright, Jr.
Paris, Leonard [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa³ / wrote:
Perhaps he uses the SB28 with his Nikon F5. It can be used
with the other
cameras but just not TTL. The SB28 has
a sensor on the flash unit so that auto flash may be used on old and
off-brand cameras as well as TTL with Nikon cameras
If you can get a sharp image in the viewfinder, why argue about success?
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Frank Wajer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 8:29 AM
To: pdml
Subject: diopter on MZ-5n, strange
Hi,
last week I played with the diopter on my new
Well, I'm sure you'll get a lot of good reasons from folks telling you why
the MZ-S is worth the difference in price. I haven't seen that much money's
worth in feature differences, myself, but that's only *my* opinion. At
current PZ-1p prices, you could pretty much buy two of them for the price
I'd put a Sto-Fen Omnibounce on the AF500FTZ and use a lens wide enough to
capture as much of the dome as you desire, i.e. if you need a fisheye, use
one. The Sto-Fen will give good coverage down to a 16mm wide angle. I'd
practice several shots (while the chandelier is there) and see what the
It is a nice, expensive, hard case for carrying camera equipment.
Otherwise, it's a bird whose beak can hold more than his belly can. :-)
Whether it's handy or not, is kind of subjective. If you really need one,
it's definitely handy.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Anand DHUPKAR
Sounds like the camera tried to get an extra frame or two out of the roll.
How many exposures did you get?
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 5:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Overlapping frames on MZ-S
Can you suggest a non-destructive test to determine whether it's glass or
not? It would also be preferred that testing not require expenditure of
money. The only way I can think of to get the information free would be to
ask someone at Pentax. Barring that, you could order a replacement eyepiece
I'd guess that just how much tension it takes to activate the automatic film
rewind sequence in a camera body is a design parameter for the camera but,
the length of the film in the cartridge is a function of the quality control
folks at the film manufacturers, as is the drag present in a
Remember, though we here on the PDML all know the true value of an LX, to a
pawn shop or a fence (buyer and reseller of stolen goods) it's just an old
camera. My Nikon F bodies have great value to me because I bought them new,
but they are still over 30 years old. The LX is a 20+ year old
The portability of the flash remains about the same. I use the Quantum
Turbo, which is a bit larger, and heavier, than the Turbo Z. I sling the
battery, on a strap, over my shoulder kind of like a shoulder holster. If
you shoot weddings, Quantum batteries are not an overkill, they are a
That sounds like something is not being turned off when it should be. I'm
not saying that you aren't turning the camera off when you aren't using it,
I'm saying that something internal is on all the time and using battery
power.
Are there any Pentax function settings that could have an impact?
-Original Message-
From: george de fockert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 7:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: scanned pentax stuff
Pentax literature (most of them dutch)
The originals scanned at 300dpi to PNG, but the files here
are at
It seems to me that if there is a separate AE Lock button, then there's no
real reason to have the shutter button provide AE Lock, as well. So, the
manual may have mislead you. More than likely, the guys that wrote the
manual just assumed that pushing the shutter button halfway down would
I thought farthings were a monetary unit. Are you sure you don't mean
furlong?
Furlongs per fortnight would be a measure of speed.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
In essence, looking for a flash of insight, or epiphany, or a moment of
satori in every shot. Sounds like a way to define shibumi.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Bob Walkden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re[2]: One
I'd hazard a guess that they are several years behind on major mail fraud
cases, not to mention the minor ones. Much as we'd like to have Big
Brother handle all of our problems for us, we still need to do our homework
before we shell out our money.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From:
, to advance your picture taking skill, then you can take a very Zen
approach. We definitely have some of each here. It shows in the PUG.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Bob Walkden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:03 PM
To: Paris, Leonard
Subject: Re[4
For a few bucks, you can buy a lens vise from Fargo and use it to fix dented
filter rings. I have one at home. It works well. Some camera stores have
one on hand and will fix the filter ring for a nominal fee, or even free, if
you are a known customer. Ask around.
Len
---
-Original
The short answer is: No, the FA 50mm f/1.4 is sharper. However, other list
members will tell you there are other characteristics to consider, most of
which are very subjective. Considering the price difference, there is
absolutely no contest. If your pockets are not deep, buy the FA 50mm
For certain purposes, the FA 28-200 does quite nicely. It's a nice lens for
outdoor portraits, an application where the utmost in sharpness is not
always desireable. There are some very nice pictures taken with this lens
that are in past PUG submissions. If you can't get what you want selling
I have a metz SCA adapter that I use with my PZ-1p and a Metz 45CT-4. The
adapter has a spot beam. I suspect that the same SCA adapter would work
with the MZ-5n. I'm not at home now but I think the model number is: SCA
3701. You can always look at http://ww.metz.de and find out. All of the
You know folks, the fact that you can walk into a Wal-Mart (and others),
pull the SmartMedia card, or CompactFlash card out of your digital camera
and plug it into the appropriate slot of a digital print maker, select your
choices for print size, color balance, sharpness, cropping, etc. and get
When you get one of those HTML messages, just change it to ASCII text before
you reply to it. It's an easy thing to do. Then, your reply will be in
plain ASCII text too.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Peifer, William [OCDUS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06,
There is an old photographic adage that says, If your pictures aren't
interesting, you aren't close enough. So maybe you have come to the correct
conclusion. :)
Len
---
Or maybe the conclusion is that I have to get closer :-(
j
--
OK, Bill,
There is a way to set up Outlook to only send in plain text, regardless. On
the screen where you can see all of your message subject lines, pull down
the Tools menu, select options, and then select the tab that says Mail
Format. The top entry there will let you select plain text as
You'll still have to carry several sets with you, unless you have a way to
recharge them on locatiom. if so, you may get by with only two sets.
Rechargeables do solve the problem of having to buy a lot of new batteries
but they don't solve the problem of having to change batteries during the
The e-10 works great, too. I traded four bodies and three lenses for the
one I have. None of the stuff I traded was Pentax, though, so I didn't lose
anything critical.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Mike Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:24 PM
Yep, it could have been part of an estate sale KEH bought. They do a lot of
that.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Lindamood, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:10 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Not Like the 24-90? Why not?
I like mine great deal,
If it will trigger the flash, i.e. through a pc connection, it should work
fine. Just remember that you are going to get a full power flash each time,
if you give the flash enough time to recharge between flashes.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: herbet brasileiro [mailto:[EMAIL
Everybody is looking for a bargain. The FA 24mm f/2 sells new for $US 399.95
at Adorama.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Collin Brendemuehl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 10:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:Sell 24mm
Seems to be a popular
--
From: "Paris, Leonard" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 16:50:43 -
Everybody is looking for a bargain. The FA 24mm f/2 sells
new for $US 399.95
at Adorama.
Len
--
-- "They have vanquished freedom
As I said only minutes ago, Adorama sells 'em new for $399.95.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Gerald Cermak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 10:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Thinking of Sell 24mm
Mail order from http://www.bhphoto.com
(Hey, I've
still got my
manual Canon TX, with a good FD 1.8 lens, but when I looked
to use it on a
more modern Canon those folks there told me to forget about
it, this lens is
now basically without any value, they said!) (Some nerve!)
(Sheeesh!)
It might help if you think about the
Yes they are. Even the screw mount lenses may be used with an adapter.
However, the features supported by the lenses are what you will get.
For more detail, go to http://www.phred.org/pentax/k/ and you'll know it all
very shortly.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My Nikon user room mate says it looks like a cheap cigar
lighter. I can't come up with a better description myself.
William Robb
That's just "sour grapes" because the seller won't ship the
camera overseas. :^)
Len
---
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
-Original Message-
From: Daniel J. Matyola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 12:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help on digital for newsprint
"Paris, Leonard" wrote:
How would we know? We are a bunch of Pentax camera users
that
I think Ilford bought the process but, probably, many more people recognize
the name Cibachrome than do the name Ilfochrome just because the name
Cibachrome existed for a longer period. I believe they are the same thing.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, not really any worse than any other Monday. :-)
I Find 400+ messages in the PDML and then along comes
another digital topic to inflate the non-Pentax
message count. I'm interested in digital stuff,
computers, printers, etc., myself but I try to
keep my posts on-topic for the forum I'm in.
1 - 100 of 415 matches
Mail list logo