I'm using Photoshop CS6 with ACR 9.1.1 and also LIghtroom v6.0. I only
have two newer lenses - DFA 28-105 and DFA 15-30 - but profiles for both
seem to be supported, even though Adobe says they are not. Screenshots:
Yes.
The LensTagger plugin presents you with a screen where you can fill in
the relevant data, and save it as a preset.
When you run the command, it is actually executed by another program,
the exiftool by Phil Harvey. Afterwards, you need to update metadata
from file in LR to see the change.
Oh Bill make a copy of your old cameraraw file befor you start
modifiying it!
On 8/11/2018 11:27 PM, Jos de Fotograaf wrote:
Hi Bill,
Profile I do not know, but lens naming I do as follows:
I have a picture taken with a K5 and this Sigma 10-20mm this name is
not known by light room,
When I
Hi Jostijn,
Interesting option
Is my understanding right, that I have to add the information manually
to each picture, sometimes in batch?
Greetz, Jos
On 8/10/2018 11:14 PM, Jostein wrote:
Bill,
I'm still on Lightoom 5, and anyways use a number of unconventional
optical setups. I use a
Hi Bill,
Profile I do not know, but lens naming I do as follows:
I have a picture taken with a K5 and this Sigma 10-20mm this name is not
known by light room,
When I read its metadata with the little program "PhotoMe", it shows
lens ID: 3 44
When I import this photo into lightroom, the lens is
Do you recon it would work with Adobe Bridge CS6?
On 8/10/2018 17:14, Jostein wrote:
Bill,
I'm still on Lightoom 5, and anyways use a number of unconventional optical
setups. I use a plugin called LensTagger that allows me to write specific lens
designations into the XMP tags. It's
It would be awesome if there was a collection of these lens profiles someplace.
Lr 6 doesn't even have one for the fa50/1.4
On August 10, 2018 2:14:02 PM PDT, Jostein wrote:
>Bill,
>I'm still on Lightoom 5, and anyways use a number of unconventional
>optical setups. I use a plugin called
Bill,
I'm still on Lightoom 5, and anyways use a number of unconventional
optical setups. I use a plugin called LensTagger that allows me to write
specific lens designations into the XMP tags. It's donationware, and
well worth the dollars you can spare, IMHO.
https://www.lenstagger.com/
Hi Bill,
I suspect someone on the list probably has a more detailed knowledge of
this question. But maybe a small tidbit that I know could be helpful.
I am not sure what you meant by the "wrong platform": Mac vs. Windows or
LR CC vs earlier versions.
There is a tool "Adobe Lens Profile
Bill wrote:
I'm probably missing something obvious, but in Lightroom 6 (not CC),
when rating images by star, there is a banner popup that indicates an
image has just been given a rating.
Can it be made to go away?
If you wait about a second, it will go away. If you don't want the
Larry Colen wrote:
The Lightroom panorama function works pretty well, for most things.
However, I have a couple cases of adjacent frames that each have a
meteor trail in them. Since I can't tell LR which areas I specifically
want to include/exclude in a panorama, is it possible to take my
On 13/08/2015 5:47 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Larry Colen wrote:
The Lightroom panorama function works pretty well, for most things.
However, I have a couple cases of adjacent frames that each have a
meteor trail in them. Since I can't tell LR which areas I specifically
want to include/exclude in
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:33 AM, David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you do a copy or move when doing the import? If so, then the
files are on your hard drive, wherever the default location is. If
you did an Add, then the files are still on the memory card.
I can't test it
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:33 AM, David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
Did you do a copy or move when doing the import? If so, then the
files are on your hard drive, wherever the default location is. If
you did an
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:33 AM, David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
Did you do a copy or move when doing the import? If so, then the
files are on your hard drive, wherever the default location is. If
you did an
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:27 AM, David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:33 AM, David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
Did you do a copy or move when doing the import? If so, then the
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
The hole in my foot is still smoking from two weeks ago when I did
exactly that while tutoring another photographer. :-(
I'm curious how that happened, because the manual confirms that the
Add and Move import methods
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
The hole in my foot is still smoking from two weeks ago when I did
exactly that while tutoring another photographer. :-(
I'm curious how that
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I haven't been able to get rid of the phantom Folder called Kingston
yet either. It sits there on the left under the Folders tab taunting
me. Nyah, nyah: you're a shitty teacher. :) There doesn't seem to be
a delete
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I haven't been able to get rid of the phantom Folder called Kingston
yet either. It sits there on the left under the Folders tab taunting
me. Nyah,
On 20/08/2014 8:01 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
The hole in my foot is still smoking from two weeks ago when I did
exactly that while tutoring another
Lightroom recognizes any storage volume which is laid out with the DCIM
directory structure as a camera or camera card. If you had loaded up a card
with files and didn't honor the DCIM directory structure, Lightroom would
simply see it as another USB mass storage volume allowing Add and Move
This card came out of a K-5. Lr apparently glitched.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com wrote:
Lightroom recognizes any storage volume which is laid out with the DCIM
directory structure as a camera or camera card. If you had loaded up a card
with files and
In my experience, it's much more likely that the card had some issue with its
file system at that time.
It hardly matters, but in every case like this I've examined when I was
teaching and doing client support, the issues were never resolved to be a LR
fault, they were always something in the
On 8/19/2014 10:32 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:01 PM, John sesso...@earthlink.net wrote:
I made the mistake of importing images directly into lightroom from my memory
card.
Not sure why that would be considered a mistake; I consider it a
normal workflow.
It was a
In Lightroom, library mode, grid view, select the files. Then drag them to the
folder in the Folders panel you want them to be located in. LR will do the move
operation and update the database properly.
Godfrey
On Aug 20, 2014, at 4:04 PM, John sesso...@earthlink.net wrote:
Ok. Now I know
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:01 PM, John sesso...@earthlink.net wrote:
I made the mistake of importing images directly into lightroom from my memory
card.
Not sure why that would be considered a mistake; I consider it a
normal workflow.
But where the hell are my actual DNG files?
Right-click
Did you do a copy or move when doing the import? If so, then the
files are on your hard drive, wherever the default location is. If
you did an Add, then the files are still on the memory card.
If you can see the pictures in Lightroom, you can right click on it
and select Go to Folder in
Will this work?
Open the file with her tweaks
Create a develop preset
Open your original RAW file and create a virtual copy
Apply the preset of her tweaks to the new copy
-p
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 16, 2014, at 11:51 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
My friend Candice wanted to try
I may not understand the question. But it would seem that if you do an
import-from-catalog you will bring in her (changed) files. Or just the changes
to the files. If you don’t want to lose your originals in the process, make a
duplicate first. The re-import will “overwrite the original but
What you are describing are Smart Collections.
B
On 1 Nov 2013, at 05:16, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, wise people of PDML :-).
I have an idea/question. Say, in LightRoom Library module I set up a filter
and see some pics. I sort them some, mark them some, etc. Then I
On 11/1/2013 8:27 AM, Bob W wrote:
What you are describing are Smart Collections.
B
I'm unfamiliar with this feature. So it is time to get acquainted.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
There's an EXIF token FocusMode that EXIFtool can read, but I
suspect it's somewhat variable as to what cameras support using it and
how it's included in EXIF data. Lightroom does not display it nor
present it as a sorting option, so you'd need to write a script with
EXIFtool to determine if a
Jeff Friedl has a metadata viewer tool available as a plug-in, but it
doesn't look to include AF data. He might update if you ask him, he's
fairly responsive.
http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/metadata-presets
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I assume
In a sense, yes.
However, Bridge does not maintain an editing history or allow
organization of files into collections and groupings independent of
the file system. It simply records IPTC annotations and adds them to
the processing parameter settings that Camera Raw writes into .XMP
sidecar files
A related question:
When moving a big directory tree, am I better moving the whole tree in
lightroom? Or am I better off moving it with the file system, then just telling
lightroom where the root of that tree is?
On Jul 14, 2011, at 1:23 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
Last weekend, when photographing
From: Larry Colen
Last weekend, when photographing at a dojo event, I ran out of space
on the harddrive that I've been using for my raw files. So, I put
the raw files from the weekend onto an external drive.
When I was at Costco today, they had a good price on a 3TB USB3
external drive, so I
On Jul 14, 2011, at 9:09, John Sessoms wrote:
I'm not a lightroom guru by any means, but I think that once you have all
your files in the place you want them, you can make a new lightroom catalog
that points to those files in the location you want it to point to.
Oy - wouldn't a new
Wrote a complete article on exactly this subject some time ago:
http://www.gdgphoto.com/articles/ click on 08 - Lightroom, moving a
large number of files
G
On Thursday, July 14, 2011, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Last weekend, when photographing at a dojo event, I ran out of space on
On Jul 14, 2011, at 7:25 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Wrote a complete article on exactly this subject some time ago:
http://www.gdgphoto.com/articles/ click on 08 - Lightroom, moving a
large number of files
Thanks. I wish I had asked first before starting. Changing halfway through
[mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Larry Colen
Sent: 14 July 2011 10:35
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: lightroom question: moving/copy
A related question:
When moving a big directory tree, am I better moving the whole tree in
lightroom? Or am I better off moving
From: Charles Robinson
On Jul 14, 2011, at 9:09, John Sessoms wrote:
I'm not a lightroom guru by any means, but I think that once you
have all your files in the place you want them, you can make a new
lightroom catalog that points to those files in the location you
want it to point to.
Oy -
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:15 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
I'd move it outside of LR (just because why induce the overhead of
having some other application doing the moving) and then just tell LR
they're over HERE now.
Not sure how to relocate/point to a different copy when
On Jul 14, 2011, at 10:13 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Jul 14, 2011, at 7:25 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Wrote a complete article on exactly this subject some time ago:
http://www.gdgphoto.com/articles/ click on 08 - Lightroom, moving a
large number of files
Thanks. I wish I had asked
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
The files have moved on the disk. And if I look in the libraries, as far as I
can tell lightroom thinks that they've moved. However for the past several
hours I've had 4 operations in progress, each with a progress bar all
I'm pretty sure I don't understand most of that except I think you're
saying the .lrcat file performs the function for the whole catalog of
images that the .xmp files performed for individual images in Bridge?
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:15 AM, John Sessoms
Lightroom does not include the Focus Mode or any other focusing system
EXIF tokens in the EXIF metadata it displays. Probably the best thing
you can do is to use EXIFtool to extract the focusing specific
information from your image files in a list and then add it to the
image files as keywords.
Experiment a little bit with a copy of the files. I seem to recall
that if you pick a range, with the most selected file at the head,
and set a specified time for that file, the others will shift by the
relative amount that implies.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
2009/12/8 Larry Colen l...@red4est.com:
Unfortunately it seems that I have the choice of changing all of the files
to the same time, or by an integer number of hours, not tweaking the files
in one camera by five minutes so that a capture time sort works right.
Would it be an option to
Godfrey's right - I Just tried it - I selected two photos - edited the
capture time of the top one by clicking on the seconds and adding two,
clicked the change all button and the second photo had two seconds
added.
So it should be a matter of selecting all the shots from the camera
you want to
On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:22 AM, Alastair Robertson wrote:
Godfrey's right - I Just tried it - I selected two photos - edited the
capture time of the top one by clicking on the seconds and adding two,
clicked the change all button and the second photo had two seconds
added.
So it should be a
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Thanks, that seems to have worked properly, once I did it in gallery mode.
Great! Glad to help.
--
Godfrey
godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I was shooting with both bodies this weekend, particularly during dance
contests when I had the FA31 on one body and the 18-250 on the other.
Unfortunately, the clocks in the two cameras were out of sync by 5 minutes,
so
On Dec 7, 2009, at 3:47 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I was shooting with both bodies this weekend, particularly during
dance
contests when I had the FA31 on one body and the 18-250 on the other.
Unfortunately, the clocks in
On 12/10/09, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
If I can find a way for it to pay off, I'd love to.
You can start with a hat and some tap shoes - think outside the box ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
--
I don't think it's designed with that sort of approach in mind, and that's
not a way that I would recommend to anyone, but...
To use a laptop as the day-to-day working catalogue, with offline storage
say on a network drive or a separate external drive, I would probably be
thinking along these
Marnie,
The problem is not getting them into a lightroom collection.
The problem is what happens when I roll the calandar quarter's worth
of pictures off of the laptop.
I will lose access to all my favorites for that time period.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 10:43 PM,
In a message dated 10/12/2009 7:24:18 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
rf.sulli...@gmail.com writes:
Marnie,
The problem is not getting them into a lightroom collection.
The problem is what happens when I roll the calandar quarter's worth
of pictures off of the laptop.
I will lose access to all my
.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On
Behalf Of Larry Colen
Sent: 11 October 2009 21:47
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Lightroom question
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:49:54AM -0500, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Oct 11, 2009
I wish I could help, but I don't have time to write out what seems to
comprise about 70% of the nine-hour Lightroom workshop I teach. This
material ... image files in the file system and their relationship to
the Lightroom catalog ... seems to be the 95th percentile problem for
most people using
In a message dated 10/12/2009 2:32:23 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
p...@web-options.com writes:
I don't mean to sound rude, but if you don't even know whether you're
dealing with libraries or catalogues are you likely to understand any
answers you're given? You really need to learn more about
What sort of access do you want to those pictures, and when you say 'roll
the pictures off', what do you mean - are you moving them from the laptop's
internal disk to an external disk and also deleting them from the LR
catalogue, or are you keeping them in the catalogue?
When you import files
There's also online training at
http://www.kelbytraining.com/
They have 30+ teachers. Most of the course are on PS, but some are on
Lightroom. I am impressed they have a online course done by Katrin Eismann
Color to Black and White Artistry, but they seem to have some beginning and
Godfrey,
Been thinking about it. You gonna do a traveling show someday?
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
I wish I could help, but I don't have time to write out what seems to
comprise about 70% of the nine-hour Lightroom workshop I
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Godfrey,
Been thinking about it. You gonna do a traveling show someday?
If I can find a way for it to pay off, I'd love to.
--
Godfrey
godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Bob,
I think you see the problem now...
My paradyme with Photoshop was to keep everything in one catalogue on
one machine. Then it changed to move old images off the laptop (or
desktop) to free up space for newer pictures. At first, this was easy
and I was able to create a Greatest Hits album
G,
My monthly Calumet Photo catalogue lists courses they are offering.
They sponsor seminars in their locations at an instore meeting room.
See on of their catalogues for seminars in NYC, Boston, Chicago, SF, LA, etc.
(You'll need to up your prices.)
See if you can make a connection out there and
So, copy everything to your backup. Select your 2009 images, then the
Keepers sub-set of images. Then flip the selection so now you have
in your selection all of those which are NOT Keepers. Delete them from
the HD from within LR. You are left with your Keepers still on your HD.
stan
On
: Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: Lightroom question
Thanks Paul,
I'm looking for a good way to keep the shots or copies up on the
laptop after I roll the originals off the laptop and into back=up
understand you correctly. I don't know if that helps, but I gave it the
old one two. :-) Cheers, Christine
- Original Message - From: Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: Lightroom
On Oct 11, 2009, at 11:40, Larry Colen wrote:
I've got a job Tuesday night taking photos at a charity event. As part
of this job, I'm going to need to get them printed.
[snip!]
I didn't see a question...?
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com
Minneapolis, MN
OK, Here's a question.
In Photoshop Elements 5.0 I kept/keep a file of 2008 best and 2009 best photos.
That way, I can reference and print them without digging them up.
With the K-7, I've shifted to Lightroom 2.5.
The laptop quickly fills with new images, and I have to roll off past quarters.
So
Larry -
I think your question is how do I get files printable by a third party
from the raw files I've manipulated. Yes??
Here's one way...
With Lightroom in library mode -
Create a Collection - give it a name that describes the content
Find the images you want to get printed and add them
Bob -
See my answer to Larry - I think that answers your question, too.
Adding those files to a Collection just tags them in a database so
you're not keeping an additional actual image file.
-p
Bob Sullivan wrote:
OK, Here's a question.
In Photoshop Elements 5.0 I kept/keep a file of 2008
Thanks Paul,
I'm looking for a good way to keep the shots or copies up on the
laptop after I roll the originals off the laptop and into back=up
storage. This keeps me from fumbling around with extra drives all the
time.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Paul Sorenson
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:49:54AM -0500, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Oct 11, 2009, at 11:40, Larry Colen wrote:
I've got a job Tuesday night taking photos at a charity event. As part
of this job, I'm going to need to get them printed.
[snip!]
I didn't see a question...?
Sorry. The
In a message dated 10/11/2009 10:54:56 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
rf.sulli...@gmail.com writes:
OK, Here's a question.
In Photoshop Elements 5.0 I kept/keep a file of 2008 best and 2009 best
photos.
That way, I can reference and print them without digging them up.
With the K-7, I've shifted
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I went to a new dance venue last night and the blues room was lit with
orange rope lights. In short, the red channel is fairly well exposed,
but the others are a couple of stops under.
As such, there's a lot of noise in the
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I went to a new dance venue last night and the blues room was lit with
orange rope lights. In short, the red channel is fairly well exposed,
but
Marnie, it is easy. Instead of making a web directory from small
images, you can make it from originals. In the parameters of web
gallery mode you can find a parameter that sets the size of imported
images.
Unfortunately I have LR 2.1, thus I cannot show you the screen shot,
but it is there and I
In a message dated 12/7/2008 11:21:00 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marnie, it is easy. Instead of making a web directory from small
images, you can make it from originals. In the parameters of web
gallery mode you can find a parameter that sets the size of imported
Thanks for the flattery.
In the web module, on the Image tab there is a Size slider which you can use
to set the size of the long edge. I always shooot raw and leave it to the
web module to resize. I generally go with 900 pixels for 2:3 pictures, and
800 pixels for 4:3. If I remember I set the
The image pages slider under Appearance is the one that controls
the final image size.
The quality slider just adjusts the amount of .jpg compression.
Cheers,
Dave
2008/12/8 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have LR 1. I've TRIED to use it to create a web gallery. But every time I
do it resizes my
In a message dated 12/7/2008 1:47:48 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The image pages slider under Appearance is the one that controls
the final image size.
The quality slider just adjusts the amount of .jpg compression.
Cheers,
Dave
==
Hey, great. I will
In a message dated 12/7/2008 1:09:11 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks for the flattery.
In the web module, on the Image tab there is a Size slider which you can use
to set the size of the long edge. I always shooot raw and leave it to the
web module to resize. I
Mark Roberts wrote:
All right, this has been driving me bonkers and I can't find an answer...
How do I change the default sort order in Lightroom? Every time I import
a directory of files it sorts the images by capture time and I have to
*manually* change it to sort by file name. What's
Scott Loveless wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
All right, this has been driving me bonkers and I can't find an answer...
How do I change the default sort order in Lightroom? Every time I import
a directory of files it sorts the images by capture time and I have to
*manually* change it to sort
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Roberts
Sent: 29 July 2008 19:32
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Lightroom question
Scott Loveless wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
All right, this has been driving me bonkers and I can't
find an answer...
How do I change the default sort
Bob W wrote:
Unsurprisingly, there have been a lot of complaints about
these issues,
I'm quite surprised by that. OK, there should be a way to change the
default sort order on import, but until your post I had no idea there
wasn't - I've felt no need for anything other than what it does.
I have the Beta 2 version here, i'll try a sort on it and see what it does.
Dave
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob W wrote:
Unsurprisingly, there have been a lot of complaints about
these issues,
I'm quite surprised by that. OK, there should be a way
Easiest way (Lightroom 1.4.1):
- click on the folder or collection of photos you want to search
- open the Find panel
- click the Text checkbox
- set the upper popup to Keywords
- set the Rule popup to Are Empty
The grid will now show all exposures which have no assigned keywords.
Godfrey
On
Got that!
Thanks!
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Easiest way (Lightroom 1.4.1):
- click on the folder or collection of photos you want to search
- open the Find panel
- click the Text checkbox
- set the upper popup to Keywords
- set the Rule popup to Are Empty
The grid will now show all
On Jun 1, 2008, at 16:37, Rick Womer wrote:
Thanks, Godders.
I found out why it wasn't working--I was clicking on
the slide mount in the Grid view, rather than on the
image itself. I don't want fingerprints on the
images, after all...
I was making exactly that same mistake when I started
On Jun 1, 2008, at 2:21 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
I would like to add a photo to an existing Collection.
So, I read the f###ing documentation, which says to
select the photo in Library Grid mode, and drag it to
the desired collection in the Collection Panel.
Nifty, except that the photos
Thanks, Godders.
I found out why it wasn't working--I was clicking on
the slide mount in the Grid view, rather than on the
image itself. I don't want fingerprints on the
images, after all...
Rick
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 1, 2008, at 2:21 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
Thanks, Adam. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 12:37 AM
Subject: Re: Lightroom: Question about Clarity
Clarity is more like sharpening for the mid-tones only
Christine -
I don't think you can duplicate the clarity function in the camera.
It is applying sharpening to the mid-tones. That's an
oversimplification. Here are the details.
http://www.oreillynet.com/digitalmedia/blog/2007/07/lightroom_11_the_clarity_tool_1.html
I've read in several
Clarity adds contrast in the midtones. Nothing magic about that. So
you don't need to worry about in camera settings and exposure. It
simply makes the picture pop a bit more. Some times I use it as a semi
sharpening tool.
MaritimTim
2008/4/12, Christine Aguila [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Everyone:
Several good responses, re, Clarity. They are all correct, it adds mid
tone contrast or punch.
I have a routine when developing in LR, and basically it it top to
bottom. Do the color balance first, then exposure, etc.. Sometimes if
my exposure is only a little on the low side, ie, less than 1/2
-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: Lightroom: Question about Clarity
Christine -
I don't think you can duplicate the clarity function in the camera.
It is applying sharpening to the mid-tones. That's an
oversimplification. Here are the details
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
