s worked on this intersection,
> the French philosopher, Christiane Chauvire. But there must be others.
>
> As a footnote, my professional background is in strategic management, not in
> philosophy. I am interested in Peircean philosophy, and especially his work
> on semiotic triangles, given that I believe it
NICAMP), Itala Maria Loffredo D'Ottaviano (UNICAMP),
Graham Priest (CUNY).
*+info: *defective.scie...@gmail.com
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui
top.opencompose(\'mahe3...@gmail.com\',\'\',\'\',\'\')
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to
,
> but am just speculating) then we have a dot of sorts which corresponds to
> icon?
>
> I have never really been able to make much headway with the graphs... Also
> really good to see some discussions in past couple of days.
>
> Best
>
> Jack
>
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L
Gary R,
When people make statements on Peirce-L, they usually have a good reason for
making them. If one happens to disagree with them, it's far better (more
fruitful and more likely to lead to a deeper understanding) to ask a question
than to contradict what they said.
I agree
se(\'tabor...@primus.ca\',\'\',\'\',\'\')
[8]
http://webmail.primus.ca/javascript:top.opencompose(\'mahe3...@gmail.com\',\'\',\'\',\'\')
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@lis
within each line, but am just speculating)
then we have a dot of sorts which corresponds to icon?
I have never really been able to make much headway with the graphs... Also
really good to see some discussions in past couple of days.
Best
Jack
From: peirce-l-requ
lopment of a society.
>
>
> Responding to
>
> On Thu 07/10/21 9:48 AM , Margaretha Hendrickx mahe3...@gmail.com sent:
>
> List,
>
> How many of you are working on -- or interested in -- studying the
> connection between the philosophy of Karl Popper and Charles Peirce?
>
>
&
hy of Karl Popper and Charles Peirce?
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.
ou are working on -- or interested in -- studying the
>> connection between the philosophy of Karl Popper and Charles Peirce?
>>
>> So far, I know of only one philosopher who has worked on this
>> intersection, the French philosopher, Christiane Chauvire. But there must
>> be
; So far, I know of only one philosopher who has worked on this
>> intersection, the French philosopher, Christiane Chauvire. But there must
>> be others.
>>
>> As a footnote, my professional background is in strategic management, not
>> in philosophy. I am interested in Peircean philoso
te, my professional background is in strategic management, not
in philosophy. I am interested in Peircean philosophy, and especially his
work on semiotic triangles, given that I believe it provides some key
answers to epistemological problems in management research.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L sub
rs.
>
> As a footnote, my professional background is in strategic management, not
> in philosophy. I am interested in Peircean philosophy, and especially his
> work on semiotic triangles, given that I believe it provides some key
> answers to epistemological problems in manageme
oncentrate their reflections on *their own participation*
on Peirce-L. For I agree with what Margaretha wrote earlier today that "It is all a manner of deliberate and critical
self-reflection on what one gets from being and participating on this ListServ."
A short while back Gary
stematically,
> but one point in my book Turning Signs about a metaphor they both used,
> science as a “conversation with nature”:
> Natural Dialogic (TS ·2) (gnusystems.ca).
>
> Gary f.
>
> From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu On
> Behalf Of Margaretha Hendrickx
&
Gary f.
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu On
Behalf Of Margaretha Hendrickx
Sent: 7-Oct-21 09:49
To: Peirce-L
Subject: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce & Popper
List,
How many of you are working on -- or interested in -- studying the connection
between the philosophy of Karl Popper and Charles Peir
, and especially his work on semiotic triangles, given that
I believe it provides some key answers to epistemological problems in
management research.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts
.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu
with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the
t be as a little child, with all the sincerity and simple-mindedness of
> the child's vision, with all the plasticity of the child's mental habits.”
> — C.S. Peirce, RLT 192 (1898)
>
>
>
>
>
> From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu On Behalf Of Gary Richmond
> Sent: 7-Oc
(1898)
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu
On Behalf Of Gary Richmond
Sent: 7-Oct-21 05:18
To: Peirce-L
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Abracadabra (was Modeling Humanities : the
case ofPeirce's Semiotics (part B1))
John, List,
"Men seem to themselves to be g
.” — C.S. Peirce,
RLT 192 (1898)
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu On
Behalf Of Gary Richmond
Sent: 7-Oct-21 05:18
To: Peirce-L
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Abracadabra (was Modeling Humanities : the case
ofPeirce's Semiotics (part B1))
John, List,
"Men seem to themselves to be g
ed.
>
> The recent discussions of comments by De Tienne and Atkins about
> phaneroscopy were interesting, but nobody can be certain that their
> opinions about the "science egg" are what Peirce intended. On these
> issues, good questions are more valuable than definitive answers.
cult to find relevant posts.
Almost all professional philosophers have either been eliminated or died.
In my judgment, the average IQ of posters here on this list serve is in log
decline.
Cheers
Jerry
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply
Peirce intended. On these
issues, good questions are more valuable than definitive answers.
In summary, a good way to improve the level of discourse on Peirce-L is to
ask more questions and to avoid making definitive pronouncements about what
Peirce meant. De Tienne read as much or more than
ctions.
I would hope that all here would reflect on and, indeed, concentrate their
reflections on *their own participation* on Peirce-L. For I agree with
what Margaretha
wrote earlier today that "It is all a manner of deliberate and critical
self-reflection on what one gets from being an
he considered one. These characterisations are natural and
parameterised by unification algorithms.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.ed
orld Hypotheses * has been most helpful
for me to put the work of Lakoff and Johnson in the larger context.
My very best, Margaretha H.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to
Logic (Published
Papers), 1933. CP 3.359–403.
• Peirce, C.S., Writings of Charles S. Peirce : A Chronological Edition, Peirce Edition Project (eds.), Indiana
University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN, 1981–. Volume 5 (1884–1886), 1993. Item 30, 162–190.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L
Bernard:
> On Aug 27, 2021, at 5:33 PM, Bernard Morand wrote:
>
> It is a good illustration of my feeling about the bad quality level of the
> discussions on Peirce-l.
My feelings are fully parallel with yours.
Your articulative description of the styles of communica
> Edwina
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed 06/10/21 1:30 PM , Bernard Morand morand.bern...@neuf.fr sent:
>>>
>>> Thanks Jerry for this reply and support.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately I have no complete answer to your pertinent question:
>>> &
; I doubt if this can change.
>>>
>>> Edwina
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed 06/10/21 1:30 PM , Bernard Morand morand.bern...@neuf.fr sent:
>>>
>>> Thanks Jerry for this reply and support.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately I have no
esult is an escalating round of
ad hominem attacks and defenses. For the list I mentioned, the
practice of avoiding the word 'you' kept the peace, shortened the
debates, and made life more pleasant for everyone. (
https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2018-08/msg00018.html [1])
GF: As we’ve seen
question: "What
>> practical steps are necessary to re-enliven our community and our
>> communications? "
>>
>> Perhaps some listers actually silent have good ideas about that. They
>> ought to be encouraged to manifest themselves in some kind of &qu
--and the result is an escalating round of ad hominem attacks and
defenses. For the list I mentioned, the practice of avoiding the word 'you'
kept the peace, shortened the debates, and made life more pleasant for
everyone. (https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2018-08/msg00018.html)
GF: As we’ve seen here
Morand
wrote:
It is a good illustration of my feeling
about the bad quality level of the discussions on
Peirce-l.
My feelings are fully parallel with yours.
Your articulative
;
> Regards
>
> Bernard
> Le 06/10/2021 à 18:03, Jerry LR Chandler a écrit :
>
> Bernard:
>
> On Aug 27, 2021, at 5:33 PM, Bernard Morand
> wrote:
>
> It is a good illustration of my feeling about the bad quality level of the
> discussions on Peirce-l.
>
>
>
t 5:33 PM, Bernard Morand
wrote:
It is a good illustration of my feeling
about the bad quality level of the discussions on
Peirce-l.
My feelings are fully parallel with yours.
Your articulative
n of my feeling about the bad quality level
of the discussions on Peirce-l.
My feelings are fully parallel with yours.
Your articulative description of the styles of communication denotes
the essential nature of the subjective logical fallacies that
constrain the discussions to the very, very narro
one conveyed by JAS and his supporters; this
>> is what is at stake in this debate:
>>
>> *"Peirce hoped to create an exact philosophy by applying the ideas of
>> modern mathematical exactitude. He developed a semiotic pattern of
>> mathematical procedure with which to test validity i
Robert Marty
Honorary Professor ; PhD Mathematics ; PhD Philosophy
fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Marty [4]
https://martyrobert.academia.edu/ [5]
Links:
--
[1] http://www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt
[2] http://twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
[3]
http://webmail.primus.ca
17954477817507515_m_3816163190580610126__ftn3>."*
>
>
> [1] <#m_8517954477817507515_m_3816163190580610126__ftnref1> Roland Barthes
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roland_Barthes>, Mythologies
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mythologies_(book)>, 1957,
ered a French saying: "Qui ne dit mot
>>> consent" (Who doesn't say a word, consents). I am therefore entitled to
>>> consider today that my criticism is fully recognized as fair and
>>> well-founded. This encourages me to publish it more widely and extend this
&
Peirce • Collected Papers, CP 1.186 (1903)
Syllabus • Classification of Sciences (CP 1.180–202, G-1903-2b)
ttp://web.archive.org/web/2005121054/http://www.princeton.edu/~batke/peirce/cl_o_sci_03.htm
Re: Peirce List
https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2021-10/thrd1.html#00013
::: John Sowa
he
considered one. These characterisations are natural and parameterised by
unification algorithms.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBS
of the chemical sciences as it emergesd
from Sir Rutherford’s numbers.
Cheers
Jerry
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSC
necessarily consider
> habit to be "self-controlled" but often, in his schema, it can resemble what
> Engels called "false consciousness". The interesting part, though, is that
> Bourdieu locates in habitus the same order of generative principle which
> Peirce seems to
t overlap between your line of inquiry and mine (the contrast
> between the two definitely induces the same order of heuristic to my mind,
> there is something structurally equivalent between your query and mine, to
> my mind).
>
> I hope to clarify my position within the week as it is still
equivalent between your query and mine, to my mind).
I hope to clarify my position within the week as it is still very much up in
the air, and, in truth, off the beaten track of what I'm supposed to be doing
(which is why I've thrown it to the "floor"!).
Best
Jack
_
tion to *habitus* though Bourdieu would deviate slightly insofar
>> as he doesn't necessarily consider habit to be "self-controlled" but often,
>> in his schema, it can resemble what Engels called "false consciousness".
>> The interesting part, though, is that Bo
;false consciousness". The
> interesting part, though, is that Bourdieu locates in *habitus* the same
> order of generative principle which Peirce seems to have discerned and
> which Chomsky, too seems to place in recursion insofar as recursion is
> understood as a regularity whic
recursion insofar as
recursion is understood as a regularity which can/does produce/generate
differences in structural form.
Best
Jack
____
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behalf of Jon Alan Schmidt
Sent: Monday, October 4, 2021 5:36 PM
To: Peirce-L
Subject:
(semiosis as it is in itself contrasted with our
perception/experience of sign relations) implies that the DO exists
in connection with, but quite apart from, and in some sense
therefore, external to, the IO?
Jack
-
From: Edwina Taborsky
Sent: Monday, October 4, 2021 5:00 PM
To
gh Chomsky
> is a resolute Cartesian and the others reject such a position out of hand).
>
> Would be very interested to receive any variety of response to this -
> preferably those which ardently disagree with me!
>
> Best
>
> Jack
>
> --
> *Fr
From: Edwina Taborsky
Sent: Monday, October 4, 2021 5:00 PM
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu ; JACK ROBERT KELLY CODY
Subject: Re: Re: [EXTERNAL] [PEIRCE-L] Fwd: Re: Cognitive Signs (was All
Semiotic, No Puzzle)
Jack, list
I think there are multiple meanings of 'efficient
servations or descriptions of it. However, the language in which the
> analysis is conducted is a meta-language that involves a variety of
> semiotic presuppositions. Those semiotic presuppositions constitute a
> meta-theoretic framework in which we can accomplish phanerosc
the rest of the baggage
associated with Chomskyean theory re UG.
Best
Jack
-
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu
on behalf of Edwina Taborsky
Sent: Monday, October 4, 2021 2:52 PM
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [PEIRCE-L] Fwd: Re:
e others reject such a position out of hand).
Would be very interested to receive any variety of response to this -
preferably those which ardently disagree with me!
Best
Jack
____
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behalf of JACK ROBERT KELLY CODY
Sent: Monday, Octob
sound even if one wishes to
dispense with the rest of the baggage associated with Chomskyean theory re UG.
Best
Jack
____
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behalf of Edwina Taborsky
Sent: Monday, October 4, 2021 2:52 PM
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subje
were).
Best
Jack
-----
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu
on behalf of Jon Awbrey
Sent: Monday, October 4, 2021 8:20 AM
To: s...@bestweb.net ; Peirce-L
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PEIRCE-L] All Semiotic, No Puzzle *Warning*
This email originated from
(CP 8.331)
____
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behalf of JACK ROBERT KELLY CODY
Sent: Monday, October 4, 2021 1:51 PM
To: s...@bestweb.net ; Peirce-L ;
Jon Awbrey
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [PEIRCE-L] Cognitive Signs (was All Semiotic, No Puzzle)
*Warning*
This email origi
t it might be useful to
throw it to the "floor" as it were).
Best
Jack
________
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behalf of Jon Awbrey
Sent: Monday, October 4, 2021 8:20 AM
To: s...@bestweb.net ; Peirce-L
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PEIRCE-L] All Semiotic,
did not suggest such a
revision. Why not? Can anyone suggest any other way to resolve these
issues?
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
►
e semiotic presuppositions constitute a
meta-theoretic framework in which we can accomplish phaneroscopic
analyses. (Part Two, p. 104)
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should
://gnusystems.ca/wp/ }{ living the time
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu On
Behalf Of sowa @bestweb.net
Sent: 2-Oct-21 20:53
To: Peirce-L
Subject: re: [PEIRCE-L] Broadening Phaneroscopy (was Critical analysis
ofBelluci's paper)
Jon AS, List,
That kind of broadening is essential to go beyond
e eggs or embryos. I suspect that
> Atkins was taking steps in that direction, but his names do not recognize
> the need for normative science in any attempt to broaden phaneroscopy.
>
> John
>
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply
ct that
Atkins was taking steps in that direction, but his names do not recognize
the need for normative science in any attempt to broaden phaneroscopy.
John
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. P
es there (which would include the material categories) is
> incorporated into his 2018 book *Charles S. Peirce’s Phenomenology*. I’m
> just getting started on the two papers though.
>
> Gary f.
>
>
>
> } I do not think much of a man who is no wiser today than he was
>
to me, that De Tienne's outline rests within Belluci's
> outline, for both of them seem to view the Peircean sciences as steps,
> where you simply leave the former one behind as you climb the ladder.
>
> Edwina
>
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply Lis
ad studied JA's cactus diagrams
decades ago was just in passing and was not in any way integral to the
substance of my message.
Yet even after a decade of moderating Peirce-L I remain open to suggestions
on how I might improve my moderating. I'd prefer that they be sent to me
off List, however,
} I do not think much of a man who is no wiser today than he was yesterday.
[Lincoln] {
<https://gnusystems.ca/wp/> https://gnusystems.ca/wp/ }{ living the time
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu On
Behalf Of Jon Alan Schmidt
Sent: 1-Oct-21 21:25
Robert, List:
I have re
2] https://martyrobert.academia.edu/
[13]
http://webmail.primus.ca/javascript:top.opencompose(\'robert.mart...@gmail.com\',\'\',\'\',\'\')
[14] https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Marty
[15] https://martyrobert.academia.edu/
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" o
Cf: Minimal Negation Operators • Discussion 2
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/10/02/minimal-negation-operators-discussion-2/
Re: Minimal Negation Operators
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2017/09/01/minimal-negation-operators-4/
Re: Peirce List
https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2021
gt; kind of analysis of the relationship to mathematics to other eminent
>> researchers in the Peircean community.
>>
>> Many thanks and best regards,
>>
>> Robert Marty
>>
>> Honorary Professor; Ph.D. Mathematics; Ph.D. Philosophy
>> fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/
f witchcraft was and sadly is highly plausible, other than
in our western culture(s). Not so long ago, in Germany extremely
murderous hypotheses were plausible. Plausibility should be handled
carefully, with a fire tongs. Best, Helmut _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Repl
_Marty
> *https://martyrobert.academia.edu/ <https://martyrobert.academia.edu/>*
>
>
>
> Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 12:36, robert marty a
> écrit :
>
>> List, I remind the thread opened by Phillys Chiasson, entitled "Another
>> perspective."
>> &l
ern
> culture(s). Not so long ago, in Germany extremely murderous hypotheses were
> plausible. Plausibility should be handled carefully, with a fire tongs.
>
> Best,
> Helmut
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All"
other than in our western
culture(s). Not so long ago, in Germany extremely murderous hypotheses were
plausible. Plausibility should be handled carefully, with a fire tongs.
Best,
Helmut
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY
es, e.g. the reality of
> witchcraft was and sadly is highly plausible, other than in our western
> culture(s). Not so long ago, in Germany extremely murderous hypotheses were
> plausible. Plausibility should be handled carefully, with a fire tongs.
>
> Best,
> Helmut
>
_ _ _ _ _ _
Cf: Minimal Negation Operators • 5
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/09/30/minimal-negation-operators-5/
Re: Peirce List
https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2021-09/thrd10.html#00287
https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2021-09/thrd11.html#00322
::: Imran Makani
https
n cultures, e.g. the reality of witchcraft was and sadly is highly plausible, other than in our western culture(s). Not so long ago, in Germany extremely murderous hypotheses were plausible. Plausibility should be handled carefully, with a fire tongs.
Best,
Helmut
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tages and disadvantages of the two notations?"
Such a note would enable everybody to judge the issues for themselves.
John
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should
ystems.ca/wp/ }{ living the time
From: Gary Richmond
Sent: 29-Sep-21 01:06
To: Peirce-L
Cc: Gary Fuhrman
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] André De Tienne: Slow Read slide 49
Gary F, List,
GF: "I said in a previous post that phaneroscopy is pre-scientific."
Yet Peirce positions
nions which ignore his mathematics or his semeiotics.
>
> I said in a previous post that phaneroscopy is pre-scientific. I don’t
> have a more direct answer to your question, so this will have to do.
>
> Gary f.
>
> } Once the whole is divided, the parts need names. Th
rally declare that our analysis of Peirce is the correct analysis. All
> you can do - is offer up your analysis - as an analysis of Peirce ..and
> leave it at that. You have no scholarly or other right to unilaterally
> declare that Yours-is-the-correct-analysis.
>
> I know you wo
esis and hence mentation.
Cheers
Jerry _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.e
e, of the meaning that Jon
intends to infer logically with his usage of this non-standard semantics.
However, this semantics is obviously useful in attempting to give a logical
semantics for the well-established semiosis of hyle.
Cheers
Jerry _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "
ts should be regarded as a private affair. Making belief a
dogma is a fundamentalist thing, and fundamentalism to me is
something very nasty and unscientific. Best, Helmut
Links:
--
[1] http://www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt
[2] http://twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
[3]
http://webmail.primus.ca/java
nk he would not like that. He believed in God, ok, but
> belief among scientists should be regarded as a private affair. Making
> belief a dogma is a fundamentalist thing, and fundamentalism to me is
> something very nasty and unscientific.
>
> Best, Helmut
>
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
“Let everything happen to you
> Beauty and terror
> Just keep going
> No feeling is final”
> ― Rainer Maria Rilke
> *Gary Richmond*
> *Philosophy and Critical Thinking*
> *Communication Studies*
> *LaGuardia College of the City University of New York*
>
_ _ _ _ _ _
iented
about Edwina's attitude. I agree with Mike Bergman's assessment that she
instead comes across as "incessantly confrontational" (
https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2021-09/msg00302.html). In
particular, she is the one who routinely "lash[es] out with some attack&q
neral public and are not, to my understanding, part of his theoretical outlines.
As Jon Awbrey rightly noted (https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2021-09/msg00217.html), Peirce's dictionary definitions are intended to record the usage of terms at the time when he prepared them. As such, they
://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0057%3Aentry%3Dpra%3Dgma
Liddell, H.G., and Scott, R. (1925), A Greek-English Lexicon (1940 edition),
Perseus Digital Library ( http://www.perseus.tufts.edu )
Regards,
Jon
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply
;
> I didn't conclude that at all, but rather that Jon should make some minimal
> attempt to show that relation. In truth, I think it might be more productive
> than this back and forth with me for you to discuss that relation with Jon on
> the List (this is apparently the first ti
I remind the thread opened by Phillys Chiasson, entitled "Another
> perspective."
> <https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2021-09/msg00036.html> In this
> thread, Gary Richmond wrote
> <https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2021-09/msg00038.htm> :
&g
That is why he
was constantly trying to overcome the inevitable vagueness of ordinary
language by inventing new terminology and writing rules that he hoped
other people would follow.
If Max Fisch and his students hadn't devoted many years of hard work, none
of us would be reading
ght-provoking and not at all unrelated to the question
>> of what followed upon the putative Big Bang before the "building blocks of
>> matter" were formed.
>> If you are interested in these questions, I highly recommend Jon's
>> discussion in section 5 of this paper in
this back and forth with me for you to discuss that
relation with Jon on the List (this is apparently the first time(s) you've
posted to Peirce-L).
IM: You ask: "why this conclusion is so overwhelming that it called for
threatening to ban Jon rather than engage the relevant subject
his forum -- to demonstrate the relevance of what they post
> to this forum.
>
> So, despite your not disrespectful opinion to the contrary, I am not singling
> Jon out at all. In truth, he singles himself out -- as he did earlier when
> Joe Ransdell was moderator of Peirce-L -- as
moderator of Peirce-L -- as someone who is
unwilling or unable to respect this forum's purpose and culture. And,
consequently, most often -- or so it seems to me -- his 'discussions' (when
they occur at all) are not with Peirce-L participants.
Best,
Gary Richmond (writing as Peirce-L modera
are outside the
scope of your expertise and interests, not Peirce’s. Again, this is just my
impression and I don’t mean it disrespectfully.
Best,
Imran
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 27, 2021, at 7:06 PM, Gary Richmond wrote:
>
>
> Imran, List,
>
> As Joe Ransdell wrote on
1301 - 1400 of 15242 matches
Mail list logo
