Dear list,
Here are selected passages from Moss that pertains to our current
conversation on virtuous interpretation and action. Of late, I have begun
to stop using quotation marks because Google and *up to us* to find out.
_
Aristotle clearly takes himself to be in broad agreement
Dear list,
Why Luke and not Matthew?.. Why not John?
*"In the beginning was the **λόγος**". *
*This is the very word used by the emperor: *
*God acts, **συ**̀**ν* *λόγω**, with logos.*
*I don't call a thing without logos** [**alogon**], a techne.*
*quid sit deus*.. what would God be?
It’s okay, Helmut.
Happy New Year everyone.
Wendy
> On 31 Dec 2017, at 18:23, Helmut Raulien wrote:
>
> Jon,
> Yes, Ive read that too: After the three wise men had left, an angel told Mary
> and Joseph that Herod wants to kill the child, and they should flee to Egypt,
>
Jon,
Yes, Ive read that too: After the three wise men had left, an angel told Mary and Joseph that Herod wants to kill the child, and they should flee to Egypt, which they did. But the portray was "taken" in the barn, so they were not on their way yet, so technically they were not refugees
Helmut, List:
There are two accounts of the Holy Family in the Bible. Matthew includes
the flight to Egypt to escape Herod after the visit of the Magi, which is
presumably what the artist who portrayed them as refugees had in mind.
Luke omits that particular episode.
FYI, www.biblegateway.com
espect its role is similar to the role of logic or grammar.
My best wishes for 2018 to all,
Auke an Breemen
Van: Gary Richmond [mailto:gary.richm...@gmail.com]
Verzonden: zaterdag 30 december 2017 0:32
Aan: Peirce-L
Onderwerp: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Nativity scenes
ard
Associate Professor
Department of Philosophy
Northern Arizona University
(o) 928 523-8354 [2]
-
From: Skagestad, Peter
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2017 6:12:01 PM
To: Peirce-L; Gary Richmond
Subject: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Nativity scenes
Gary, list,
. That is why semiotics is a normative science.
Best wishes,
Auke van Breemen
Van: Gary Richmond [mailto:gary.richm...@gmail.com]
Verzonden: zondag 31 december 2017 4:02
Aan: Peirce-L <peirce-l@list.iupui.edu>
Onderwerp: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Nativity scenes
Peter
ff
>
>
> Jeffrey Downard
> Associate Professor
> Department of Philosophy
> Northern Arizona University
> (o) 928 523-8354 <(928)%20523-8354>
> --
> *From:* Skagestad, Peter <peter_skages...@uml.edu>
> *Sent:* Saturday, Decemb
ct: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Nativity scenes
Gary, list,
Yes, I also thought the aspect of Peirce’s semiotics that might be helpful was
precisely his methodeutic or rhetoric - corresponding, I believe, to what
today, following Charles Morris, is generally referred to as pragmatics. And
that was
From: Gary Richmond <gary.richm...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2017 5:49:25 PM
To: Peirce-L
Subject: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Nativity scenes
List,
Well, whether or not much of this discussion has been very helpful to Peter's
sister, there has cer
On 12/30/2017 2:35 PM, Ben Novak wrote:
Ben
I have long been wondering why there is so little discussion
of relating Peirce's concepts and methodologies to concrete
examples, or other 20th and even 21st century thinkers.
I strongly with that criticism.
Regarding this, it seems something
gt; the various posts we make will, I think, help keep our discussions on the
> Peirce-L on a productive track.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Jeff
>
>
> *Jeffrey Downard*
> Associate Professor
> Department of Philosophy
> Northern Arizona University
> (o) 928 5
>> Best,
>>
>>
>>
>> Auke
>>
>>
>>
>> *Van:* Helmut Raulien [mailto:h.raul...@gmx.de]
>> *Verzonden:* zaterdag 30 december 2017 20:45
>> *Aan:* a.bree...@chello.nl
>> *CC:* peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
>> *Onderwerp:* Aw: RE: Re: Re:
ubject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Nativity scenes
Dear John F. Sowa:
You write in your email of 30 Dec., at 11:45 am:
Ben
> I have long been wondering why there is so little discussion
> of relating Peirce's concepts and methodologies to concrete
> examples, or other 20th and even 21st century
ly put your finger on it without moving it.
>> So,
>>either you take a historical or cross cultural sample of images and start
>>looking for relevant semiotic differences or you concentrate on the
>> process
>>of the making from brief to finished product and ask what semiotic
>>decisi
Helmut,
It is an instance of a legisign.
Best,
Auke
Van: Helmut Raulien [mailto:h.raul...@gmx.de]
Verzonden: zaterdag 30 december 2017 20:45
Aan: a.bree...@chello.nl
CC: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Onderwerp: Aw: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Nativity scenes
Auke,
I see, except
ent: Saturday, December 30, 2017 10:02:29 AM
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu; John F Sowa
Subject: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Nativity scenes
John, list -
I agree with all that John has written. Certainly one could do a Peircean
semiotic analysis of a nativity scene but, as John noted, it would take 20
pag
se or communication habits. In this respect its role is similar to the role of logic or grammar.
My best wishes for 2018 to all,
Auke an Breemen
Van: Gary Richmond [mailto:gary.richm...@gmail.com]
Verzonden: zaterdag 30 december 2017 0:32
Aan: Peirce-L
f the making and whether those decisions improved
>> the effectiveness of the goals aimed at. After all the history of the visual
>> arts can be looked at as explorations of the communicative and expressive
>> possibilities of signs.
>> A Peircean semiotic analysis is on
the
>> making from brief to finished product and ask what semiotic decisions have
>> been made in the process of the making and whether those decisions improved
>> the effectiveness of the goals aimed at. After all the history of the visual
>> arts can be looked at as explorations of the communicative and expressive
>> possibilities of signs.
>> A Peircean semiotic analysis is o
; PEIRCE-L <peirce-l@list.iupui.edu>; Auke van Breemen <a.bree...@chello.nl>; Claudio Guerri <claudiogue...@gmail.com>
Onderwerp: Aw: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Nativity scenes
Edwina,
I see, and agree. Peirce cannot do much for this example. But how about the other
shes for 2018 to all,
Auke an Breemen
Van: Gary Richmond [mailto:gary.richm...@gmail.com]
Verzonden: zaterdag 30 december 2017 0:32
Aan: Peirce-L
Onderwerp: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Nativity scenes
Peter, Ben, Claudio, Edwina, Auke, list,
Dear John F. Sowa:
You write in your email of 30 Dec., at 11:45 am:
Ben
> I have long been wondering why there is so little discussion
> of relating Peirce's concepts and methodologies to concrete
> examples, or other 20th and even 21st century thinkers.
>> I strongly with that criticism.
t;nature of a cloth if you only put your finger on it without moving it.
>> So,
>>either you take a historical or cross cultural sample of images and start
>>looking for relevant semiotic differences or you concentrate on the
>> process
>>of the making from brief to finished product and ask
interests than when looking for changes in sign use
or communication habits. In this respect its role is similar to the role of
logic or grammar.
My best wishes for 2018 to all,
Auke an Breemen
Van: Gary Richmond [mailto:gary.richm...@gmail.com]
Ver
looking for changes in sign use or communication habits. In this respect its role is similar to the role of logic or grammar.
My best wishes for 2018 to all,
Auke an Breemen
Van: Gary Richmond [mailto:gary.richm...@gmail.com]
Verzonden:
for 2018 to all,
Auke an Breemen
Van: Gary Richmond [mailto:gary.richm...@gmail.com]
Verzonden: zaterdag 30 december 2017 0:32
Aan: Peirce-L Onderwerp: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Nativity scenes
Peter, Ben, Claudio, Edwina, Auke, list,
I would tend to agree w
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px; }
John, list -
I agree with all that John has written. Certainly one could do a
Peircean semiotic analysis of a nativity scene but, as John noted, it
would take 20 pages and frankly, in my view, what would be
its role is similar to the role of logic or grammar.
My best wishes for 2018 to all,
Auke an Breemen
Van: Gary Richmond [mailto:gary.richm...@gmail.com]
Verzonden: zaterdag 30 december 2017 0:32
Aan: Peirce-L
Onderwerp: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Nativity sce
Ben, Helmut, Peter, and Edwina,
Ben
I have long been wondering why there is so little discussion
of relating Peirce's concepts and methodologies to concrete
examples, or other 20th and even 21st century thinkers.
I strongly with that criticism.
To understand Peirce's writings and their
Onderwerp: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Nativity scenes
Peter, Ben, Claudio, Edwina, Auke, list,
I would tend to agree with you, Peter, that Peircean
semiotics may not have too much to offer in the
analysis o
ct its role is
>similar to the role of logic or grammar.
>
>
>
> My best wishes for 2018 to all,
>
>
>
> Auke an Breemen
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Van: Gary R
listers have requested an image of the Trondheim Nativity scene, so here it is, attached.
Best,
Peter
From: Ben Novak <trevriz...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 5:13:43 PM
To: Jerry Rhee
Cc: Auke van Breemen; Peirce-L
Subject: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Nativity scenes
D
...@gmail.com]
Verzonden: zaterdag 30 december 2017 0:32
Aan: Peirce-L
Onderwerp: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Nativity scenes
Peter, Ben, Claudio, Edwina, Auke, list,
I would tend to agree with you, Peter
]
Verzonden: zaterdag 30 december 2017 0:32
Aan: Peirce-L <peirce-l@list.iupui.edu>
Onderwerp: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Nativity scenes
Peter, Ben, Claudio, Edwina, Auke, list,
I would tend to agree with you, Peter, that Peircean semiotics may not have too
much to offer in the an
Hi all,
Look what I just found on *Patheos*:
On the occasion of the coming World Day of Migrants and Refugees, and
looking at the *Holy Family of Nazareth, icon of all families*, I would
like to invite you to reflect on the condition of the migrant family.
Read more at
r
> --
> *From:* Ben Novak <trevriz...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, December 29, 2017 5:13:43 PM
> *To:* Jerry Rhee
> *Cc:* Auke van Breemen; Peirce-L
> *Subject:* Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Nativity scenes
>
> Dear List:
>
> I am a long-time foll
iz...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, December 29, 2017 5:13:43 PM
> *To:* Jerry Rhee
> *Cc:* Auke van Breemen; Peirce-L
> *Subject:* Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Nativity scenes
>
> Dear List:
>
> I am a long-time follower of the discussions on Peirce List, and am most
> grateful
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}Ben, list
Then, how, Ben, would you have advised Peter?
I agree with you that there is, at least on this list, unfortunately
little discussion relating Peirce's concepts/methods to concrete
examples, but
Dear List:
I am a long-time follower of the discussions on Peirce List, and am most
grateful for some of the discussions of Peirce's thought, which makes me
continue to read each entry. However, I have long been wondering why there
is so little discussion of relating Peirce's concepts and
Auke, Peter, list,
Is not “Holy Family as present-day refugees from the Middle East” image
enough?
At least surprising enough for Google.
And ye tell me, friends, that there is to be no dispute about taste and
tasting?
But all life is a dispute about taste and tasting!
Taste: that is
Peter,
Did you provide an image of what you described in your original question?
I have a somewhat unusual question. My sister is writing an Art History thesis
on nativity scenes and their contemporary relevance. An example is one at a
street mission in Trondheim, Norway, depicting the
On 12/29/2017 11:24 AM, Edwina Taborsky wrote:
My own view is that I think that this is getting into a
complex over-intellectualized outline of what is actually
a simple, basic analogy.
I strongly agree. There is nothing special about nativity
scenes that differs in any significant way from
Edwina, List,
I think that this is the first time that I don't agree with you...
already two times in the last days.
1. "semiotics has nothing to say about such an analogy"
If the Peircean semiotic has nothing to say, then we should close the List.
I think that exegesis of Peirce's work should
Claudio, list:
My own view is that I think that this is getting into a complex
over-intellectualized outline of what is actually a simple, basic
analogy. As I see it, none of this - what can certainly be an
enjoyable intellectual exercise for the academic mind - enlightens us
me as highly relevant to my
>> question, and I will refer my sister to a few quotes from Mead.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>> --
>> *From:* Jon Alan Schmidt <jonalanschm...@gmail.com>
>> *
R Chandler
Cc: Peirce List; Skagestad, Peter
Subject: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Nativity scenes
Jerry: I am quite aware of your post and don't need to re-read it.
I'm not sure what you mean by "your response with its conjectures that give a hint as to the identity your character' means - but it
of empathy.
Peter
-
From: Edwina Taborsky
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2017 3:19:17 PM
To: tabor...@primus.ca; Jerry LR Chandler
Cc: Peirce List; Skagestad, Peter
Subject: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Nativity scenes
Jerry: I am quite aware of your post and
cember 28, 2017 3:37:58 PM
To: tabor...@primus.ca; Jon Alan Schmidt
Cc: Peirce List
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Nativity scenes
Jon, list:
I consider you are diverting from the issue with your 'well, the question
didn't use the term analogy'... Here's Peter's comment:
"My sister
From: Jon Alan Schmidt <jonalanschm...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2017 3:11:43 PM
To: Eugene Halton
Cc: Peirce List
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Nativity scenes
Gene, Gary R., List:
How one actually responds to this or any other Sign (Dynamic Interpr
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}Jon, list:
I consider you are diverting from the issue with your 'well, the
question didn't use the term analogy'... Here's Peter's comment:
"My sister is writing an Art History thesis on nativity scenes
of empathy.
Peter
From: Edwina Taborsky <tabor...@primus.ca>
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2017 3:19:17 PM
To: tabor...@primus.ca; Jerry LR Chandler
Cc: Peirce List; Skagestad, Peter
Subject: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Nativity scenes
Jerry: I am quite aware of you
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}Gary R - I'll continue to disagree. I don't think that Peircean
semiotics can be used to correlate these two types of refugees.
As far as destitution of both sets - that is open to question on
both sets - and I
Edwina, List:
Peter's initial post did not say anything about analogy, either. The
original question was about the "contemporary relevance" of nativity
scenes. From a Peircean semeiotic perspective, it seems obvious to me that
this has to do with their Interpretants. Evoking compassion is
Jerry: I am quite aware of your post and don't need to re-read it.
I'm not sure what you mean by "your response with its conjectures
that give a hint as to the identity your character' means - but it
sounds rather insulting and out of line on this thread.
There is no
Gene, Gary R., List:
How one actually responds to this or any other Sign (Dynamic Interpretants)
will depend on one's peculiar habits of interpretation (Final
Interpretants)--feeling, action, and thought--as inculcated by one's
upbringing and subsequently cultivated by one's deliberate
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px; }
Jon, list
Again, as I've said, the issue of compassion was never brought up in
the question. The question was whether semiotics [which I presume
refers to Peircean semiotics] was applicable to use in some kind
Edwina, Gene, Peter, Jon S, Jon A, list,
Edwina wrote:
Where I would quibble with you, Gary, apart from the fact that such an
analysis has nothing to do with Peircean semiotics - is that one has to, I
think, be careful with analogies. One situation may be similar to another
situation only in
Edwinia:
Please re-read my post.
It simply states two parallel sentences.
Does your response, with its conjectures that give a hint as to the identity
your character, confirm my suggestion that there is no room for compassion in
semiotics? :-)
Best Wishes to All for a New year filled with
Edwina, List:
But that is not the form of argument in view here at all; it is more like
the following, as I understand it.
1. The members of the Holy Family were destitute in a foreign land.
2. I feel compassion for the members of the Holy Family.
3. Therefore, I ought to feel
Dear list,
Silence gives grace to woman- though that is not the case likewise with a
man.
Everything in woman is a riddle, and everything in woman hath one solution
—it is called pregnancy. Man is for woman a means: the purpose is always
the child.
But what is woman for man?
SUPPOSING
Jerry, list - but apart from the perhaps-not-quite-accurate analogy
of 'destitute in a foreign land' - don't you consider that it is
rationally dangerous to set up an analogy that might imply that the
attributes of one set can possibly be fully applied to the second
set?
Human
Yes, Gary, perhaps I did not state it clearly enough. Without the capacity
to be the other at the same time as oneself, key to Mead's definition of
the significant symbol and to empathy, nothing will be imparted. With that
capacity, the scene can impart something new to the witness, an
Peter, List:
Is it possible that what is missing from this philosophical discussion is
simple human compassion?
The Holy Family were destitute in a foreign land.
in parallel sentence structure for the image (icon) without regard to the facts
not stated of the two images,
The refuges are
Dear list,
The disparity between what something is and how an opinion or opinions
about it show up in someone of a particular character is always the engine
of any Platonic argument..
All deliberative mediation, or thinking, takes the form of a dialogue. The
person divides himself into two
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}Gary R, list -
Where I would quibble with you, Gary, apart from the fact that such
an analysis has nothing to do with Peircean semiotics - is that one
has to, I think, be careful with analogies. One situation may
Eugene, Peter, list,
I very much like your analysis, Gene. You wrote:
The implication here is that the experience of the nativity scene, with
refugees representing today as echoing Jesus as a refugee, imparts in the
witness an ability to empathize with "the other."
However, I think that rather
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}Gene, list - I appreciate your outline, but I think that it shows
the capacity of the human mind - to imagine just about anything.
To say that X IS Y; and that Y IS Z , is a purely artificial and
imagined
Dear Peter,
Peirce described the way in which symbols can grow over time. And
clearly one of the meanings of the symbol of the nativity is the family.
Feuerbach called attention to how the holy family symbol is a
representation of the earthly family. Marx took it further by claiming that
the
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}Jerry, list - heh, very funny. And quite accurate as a logical
set-up.
Edwina
On Thu 28/12/17 11:41 AM , Jerry Rhee jerryr...@gmail.com sent:
Dear Peter, list,
The surprising fact, “ Holy Family
Dear Peter, list,
The surprising fact, “Holy Family as present-day refugees from the Middle
East”, is observed;
But if “Holy family from Buckingham Palace” were true, C would be a matter
of course..
Best,
Jerry R
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Edwina Taborsky wrote:
Peter - in my view, semiotics has nothing to say about such an
analogy - for that is all it is: a 'metaphoric' analogy. Saussure's
semiology - which has nothing to do with Peircean semiotics - would
be better suited, but even then, I don't see the rationale for using
such a conceptual
73 matches
Mail list logo