Re: [HACKERS] Shouldn't psql -1 imply ON_ERROR_STOP?

2009-07-25 Thread Michael Paesold
imply ON_ERROR_STOP or some variant by default? Sounds reasonable, +1 from me. Regards Michael Paesold -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] A smaller default postgresql.conf

2008-08-20 Thread Michael Paesold
, including a link to the documentation of GUC parameters. As a kind of starting point for (new) users. Best Regards Michael Paesold -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures

2008-08-20 Thread Michael Paesold
Am 19.08.2008 um 20:47 schrieb Tom Lane: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Joshua Drake wrote: Is our backpatch policy documented? It does not appear to be in developer FAQ. Seems we need to add it. I'm not sure that I *want* a formal written-down backpatch policy. Whether (and h

Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4

2008-07-18 Thread Michael Paesold
David E. Wheeler writes: On Jul 17, 2008, at 03:45, Michael Paesold wrote: Wouldn't it be possible to create a variant of regexp_replace, i.e. regexp_replace(citext,citext,text), which would again lower-case the first two arguments before passing the input to regexp_replace(text

Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4

2008-07-17 Thread Michael Paesold
w to make that work case-insensitively. Wouldn't it be possible to create a variant of regexp_replace, i.e. regexp_replace(citext,citext,text), which would again lower-case the first two arguments before passing the input to regexp_replace(text,text,text)? Best Regards Michael Paesold

Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] patch - Collation at database level

2008-07-08 Thread Michael Paesold
e are allowing a nonstandard half-measure to drive our thinking, rather than solving the real problem which is column-level collations. Wouldn't you still need per-database and per-table default collations? At least MySQL does have such a concept. Best Regards Michael Paesold -- Sent via

Re: [HACKERS] Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again)

2008-06-27 Thread Michael Paesold
the most reasonable thing to do. Regarding the log messages about orphaned tables, it would be nice if you could add a hint/detail message explaining how to cleanup those tables. If that's possible. Best Regards Michael Paesold -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@pos

Re: [HACKERS] How to Sponsor a Feature

2008-06-12 Thread Michael Paesold
slaves, and SQL window support. I don't think these people need guidance on how to manage the project, they need some sort of way to feel comfortable saying "will pledge $Y for feature $X" in a way that makes sense on both sides. That's what I thought, too. That page just

Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work

2008-04-01 Thread Michael Paesold
Am 01.04.2008 um 13:14 schrieb Dave Cramer: On 1-Apr-08, at 6:25 AM, Michael Paesold wrote: Am 01.04.2008 um 01:26 schrieb Tom Lane: While testing the changes I was making to Pavel's EXECUTE USING patch to ensure that parameter values were being provided to the planner, it b

Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work

2008-04-01 Thread Michael Paesold
Comments/objections? Yeah, please fix this performance regression in the 8.3 branch. This would affect most of the JDBC applications out there, I think. Best Regards Michael Paesold -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] quote_literal(integer) does not exist

2007-11-29 Thread Michael Paesold
casting now. Just my $0.02. Best Regards Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Proposed patch for operator lookup caching

2007-11-26 Thread Michael Paesold
ajor performance fixes may sometimes slip in as "bug fixes".) If you all decide against that patch, we might as well just go for RC1. The catalog changes seem rather trivial, and just a required initdb is no reason for calling it another beta, IMHO. Great work on that patch, btw.! Be

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Extract catalog info for error reporting before an error actually

2007-10-25 Thread Michael Paesold
Alvaro Herrera wrote: Michael Paesold wrote: Simon Riggs wrote: On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 13:41 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: ... FWIW I disagree with cancelling just any autovac work automatically; in my patch I'm only cancelling if it's analyze, on the grounds that if you have reall

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Extract catalog info for error reporting before an error actually

2007-10-25 Thread Michael Paesold
d of course the user complained. Best Regards Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Re: [HACKERS] Feature Freeze date for 8.4

2007-10-24 Thread Michael Paesold
r own command aliases, e.g. "hg cdiff ..." to do -c diffs. Best Regards Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Re: [HACKERS] rolcanlogin vs. the flat password file

2007-10-14 Thread Michael Paesold
ing harder? IMHO this is exactly what we want. It does only offer more information when you already got authentication right and therefore doesn't open an information leak. Not sure about the warning when creating a role with a password but nologin. Could be useful. Best Regards

Re: [HACKERS] First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher

2007-10-12 Thread Michael Paesold
chema changes (doesn't sound like a good idea anyway). In that case they would better issue manual vacuums on such tables. Best Regards Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Re: [HACKERS] First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher

2007-10-12 Thread Michael Paesold
. Best Regards Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Re: [HACKERS] First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher

2007-10-11 Thread Michael Paesold
r just disable cost-delay, as Heikki suggested. There might be valid work-loads for both options... Btw., I am grateful you took up the work here, Simon. Best Regards Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usen

Re: [HACKERS] First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher

2007-10-10 Thread Michael Paesold
earlier: it will be before end of beta that people will complain about more than just restoring dumps. ;-) So does this approach work for both analyze as well as vacuum? Best Regards Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: Have

Re: [HACKERS] First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher

2007-10-02 Thread Michael Paesold
point (even when the maintenance window ends too early... or perhaps any cleanup task started during a maintenance window should keep it's "maintenance priority"?) Best Regards Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: don&

Re: [HACKERS] First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher

2007-10-02 Thread Michael Paesold
eep the behavior simple. What about a new separate lock type for analyze? Couldn't that really solve the issue? I know I'm just hand-waving here ;-) Best Regards Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Have you

Re: [HACKERS] Per-function GUC settings: trickier than it looked

2007-09-04 Thread Michael Paesold
Tom Lane wrote: Michael Paesold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I don't think it's a very good idea to make SET TRANSACTION an alias for SET LOCAL, because SET TRANSACTION has already got its own meaning in the SQL spec - it sets transaction modes. Yeah --- I'm not sur

Re: [HACKERS] Per-function GUC settings: trickier than it looked

2007-09-03 Thread Michael Paesold
still, if we pretend that there are no subtransaction, that command should too propage to the outermost transaction on release, shouldn't it? ... I believe that for consistencies sake, the "set transaction read only" should have propagated to the outermost transaction on "

Re: [HACKERS] tsearch patch and namespace pollution

2007-08-17 Thread Michael Paesold
e migration for text search in 8.3 as a benefit of getting into core and be dump-able. I guess so. Especially if you change some functions, they will have to change source code anyway. So you can as well cleanup all functions that don't fit into a sound naming schema. Best Regards Michae

Re: [HACKERS] tsearch2 in PostgreSQL 8.3?

2007-08-16 Thread Michael Paesold
] The idea was born in the thread starting here (involving Tom Lane, Joshua Drake, and Teodor Sigaev): http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-03/msg00912.php with the conclusion here: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-03/msg00936.php Best Regards Michael Paesold -

Re: [HACKERS] 2PC-induced lockup

2007-07-12 Thread Michael Paesold
than the list of historic startup messages that were removed recently. Just my two €-cents. Best Regards Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Re: [HACKERS] Still recommending daily vacuum...

2007-07-05 Thread Michael Paesold
just burning cycles. What about a threshold of 10 or 50, to have at least some sanity limit? Even though the cost of vacuum of a small table is low, it is still not free, IMHO, no? Best Regards Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In ver

Re: [HACKERS] Still recommending daily vacuum...

2007-07-03 Thread Michael Paesold
could provide numbers from production high use databases. We could probably back those down a little and make more reasonable numbers. Please do so. Perhaps others can also tell their typical settings. Best Regards Michael Paesold ---(end of broa

Re: [HACKERS] msvc and vista fun

2007-06-24 Thread Michael Paesold
ot; somehow resets $? on windows, sometimes, under some circumstances? Perhaps just move up the "my $status.." one line up? Best Regards Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [HACKERS] GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent

2007-06-21 Thread Michael Paesold
Marko Kreen wrote: On 6/21/07, Michael Paesold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Marko Kreen wrote: > Considering Postgres will never user either "meter" or "mile" > in settings, I don't consider your argument valid. > > I don't see the value of having

Re: [HACKERS] GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent

2007-06-21 Thread Michael Paesold
on_age". Please lets have the unambiguous abbreviations. Please lets make it all case-insensitive. After all this discussion, what about a straight forward vote? Bruce, we had those before, no? Best Regards Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)

Re: [HACKERS] GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent

2007-06-21 Thread Michael Paesold
quite arrogant. Most people here have tried to bring arguments and reasoning... you put it off with irrelevant anecdotes in the wrong context. Best Regards Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

Re: [HACKERS] GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent

2007-06-21 Thread Michael Paesold
hers. I just see no compelling reason to comply with a certain standard here. Best Regards Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining colum

Re: [HACKERS] Reducing NUMERIC size for 8.3

2007-06-18 Thread Michael Paesold
=> select length(n) from test; length 100017 (1 row) Best Regards Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Load Distributed Checkpoints, revised patch

2007-06-15 Thread Michael Paesold
tch status says "waiting on update from author": http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-04/msg00331.php Any updates on this? Best Regards Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [HACKERS] tsearch_core patch: permissions and security issues

2007-06-14 Thread Michael Paesold
apabilities in core. Best Regards Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match

Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum launcher doesn't notice death of postmaster immediately

2007-06-08 Thread Michael Paesold
0 seconds, but I suppose one might want a smaller naptime for a very active system? A PostgreSQL database on my laptop for testing. It should use as little resources as possible while being idle. That would be a scenario for naptime greater than 60 seconds, wouldn't it? Best Regards Michae

Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster startup messages

2007-06-01 Thread Michael Paesold
e such. +1 from me. In case of recovery, I think one should still get the full output, no? It might be important information then. Best Regards Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

Re: [HACKERS] Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?

2007-03-13 Thread Michael Paesold
A DBA will usually not even learn about this issue until they are presented with a failing restore. Best Regards, Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http:

Re: conversion efforts (Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question)

2007-02-26 Thread Michael Paesold
; after rebuilding the repository? (This command would re-sync the trac database with the repository.) Otherwise I would certainly expect such issues as Alvaro describes. Best Regards Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: if posting/reading th

Re: [HACKERS] Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto

2007-02-06 Thread Michael Paesold
I understand, it's as simple as this (untested): CREATE TABLE tab ( c DECIMAL(5,2) NOT NULL, CHECK (c >= 0) ); INSERT INTO tab ('0'); Right? Or at least: UPDATE tab SET c='0'; Best Regards Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [HACKERS] Type casting bug in 8.1.[67]?

2007-02-06 Thread Michael Paesold
Tom Lane wrote: Michael Paesold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: after upgrading from 8.1.5 to 8.1.7, I got errors in the server log when updating decimal values using string constants. Have you got a constraint or functional index on that column? Yes. Check const

[HACKERS] Type casting bug in 8.1.[67]?

2007-02-06 Thread Michael Paesold
: Table has type numeric, but query expects numeric. STATEMENT: UPDATE reminder SET reminder_charges='0' WHERE reminder_id=29362 reminder_charges is defined as: reminder_charges | numeric(5,2) | not null I guess this is a bug. Best Regards Micha

Re: [HACKERS] string_to_array eats too much memory?

2006-11-09 Thread Michael Paesold
s at a time in accumArrayResult(). Most of the rest of the code deals with resizing arrays using a "double it each time it has to grow" approach, I wonder why this is different? Without reading the code, I guess that simply means O(n^2) runtime. This should be fixed, then, right?

Re: [HACKERS] Mirror problems for download

2006-10-18 Thread Michael Paesold
Magnus Hagander wrote: Michael Paesold wrote: I just wanted to download the postgresql-8.0.9 tarball. The page I got was this: Choose a download mirror Downloading: /source/v8.0.9/postgresql-8.0.9.tar.gz We could not query the database or no mirrors could be found! Download PostgreSQL from

Re: [HACKERS] Mirror problems for download

2006-10-18 Thread Michael Paesold
Shane Ambler wrote: Michael Paesold wrote: Not being subscribed to any more appropriate list, I post this here on hackers. I just wanted to download the postgresql-8.0.9 tarball. The page I got was this: Choose a download mirror Downloading: /source/v8.0.9/postgresql-8.0.9.tar.gz We could

[HACKERS] Mirror problems for download

2006-10-18 Thread Michael Paesold
found! Download PostgreSQL from the primary site Read this if you would like to host a mirror. Of course the primary FTP site is already unavailable (530 - maximum number of users reached). I get the same error for older releases, too. Can someone look into this? Best Regards Michael Paesold

Re: [HACKERS] continuing daily testing of dbt2 against postgresql

2006-10-06 Thread Michael Paesold
e bit of work to regenerate the links. I'll try to work on that. I think it would also help if you would create reference runs for the latest 8.0 and 8.1 releases on the new hardware. Best Regards Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP

Re: [HACKERS] pgindent has been run

2006-10-04 Thread Michael Paesold
s now. Sure a directory can be skipped. I am confused how it could change expected files because it only formats C files. As far as I understand, ecpg creates .c files. Best Regards Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: if posting/re

Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 beta blockers

2006-09-17 Thread Michael Paesold
coding. Even with psql there could be issues with existing scripts, but I see a benefit at least. Best Regards Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Re: [HACKERS] FE/BE protocol vs. parameterized queries

2006-09-06 Thread Michael Paesold
st bind, or right at prepare. Best Regards Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [HACKERS] Open items for 8.2

2006-09-06 Thread Michael Paesold
edStatement but without a "prepare-threshold"[*] set. If it uses the unnamed-statement, then I guess the proposed change would be a win. Best Regards Michael Paesold [*] This option determines, after how many executes of a prepared statement, the driver will switch to server-side prepares.

Re: [HACKERS] Win32 hard crash problem

2006-09-06 Thread Michael Paesold
that implements connection pooling using the JDBC API, i.e. it is an *internal* pool running inside the app servers JVM. PG Admin cannot in any case connect through this pool. Best Regards Michael Paesold [1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/c3p0 ---(end of broadcast)

Re: [HACKERS] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?

2006-05-18 Thread Michael Paesold
Joshua D. Drake wrote: Thomas Hallgren wrote: > Couldn't we just install something that replaced invalid dates with a randomly generated but otherwise correct dates? That way they would become completely invisible. No one could even tell that the date was invalid to start with. No we can't,

Re: [HACKERS] Not so happy with psql's new multiline behavior

2006-03-04 Thread Michael Paesold
Alvaro Herrera wrote: Michael Paesold wrote: When you edit a multiline function in zsh, you can easily press Control-C, then type "man zsh", return, and press "up" to continue editing the function as it was left when you pressed Control-C. Not sure about zsh's Ct

Re: [HACKERS] Not so happy with psql's new multiline behavior

2006-03-04 Thread Michael Paesold
his should be implemented as a "plugin". (Worst case scenario, but I wonder wether we can make all people happy ever.) Best Regards, Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Re: [HACKERS] Foreign keys for non-default datatypes

2006-03-04 Thread Michael Paesold
Tom Lane writes: "Michael Paesold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Will this trigger still be called, so it can abort the delete? We'd certainly still call triggers and check row-level constraints, and any error would abort the whole statement (leaving A unmodified). The c

Re: [HACKERS] problem with large maintenance_work_mem settings and

2006-03-04 Thread Michael Paesold
nce. If the theory is true, your index creation should be much faster with a much lower setting for maintenance_work_mem, so that it uses external sort. See the discussion starting here: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-02/msg00590.php Best Regards, Mich

Re: [HACKERS] Foreign keys for non-default datatypes

2006-03-04 Thread Michael Paesold
Tom Lane wrote: If we did this then RI checks would no longer be subvertible by rules or user triggers. Stephan Szabo writes: I don't think that it'd really help because it's the actions that are generally subvertible not the checks and since those are looking at the potentially not indexed fk

Re: [HACKERS] ipcclean in 8.1 broken?

2006-03-03 Thread Michael Paesold
$ su # echo $LOGNAME ; echo $USER mip mip # exit $ su -l # echo $LOGNAME ; echo $USER root root # Of course, if you just want to question the use of "id", that's a different story. Best Regards, Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [HACKERS] Pl/Python -- current maintainer?

2006-02-26 Thread Michael Paesold
validator upon function creation? SET check_function_bodies = off; Best Regards, Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Re: [HACKERS] Domains and supporting functions

2006-02-20 Thread Michael Paesold
RIGHTARG=text, NEGATOR= ~~, RESTRICT=icnlikesel, JOIN=icnlikejoinsel ); LIKE is really not much more than syntactic sugar for the ~~ operator. Hope this is useful. Best Regards, Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [HACKERS] Need pointers to "standard" pg database(s) for testing

2006-02-17 Thread Michael Paesold
Ron wrote: I assume we have such? You could look at the Sample Databases project on pgfoundry: http://pgfoundry.org/projects/dbsamples/ Best Regards, Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will

Re: [HACKERS] Spaces in psql output (Was: FW: PGBuildfarm member snake Branch HEAD Status changed)

2006-02-10 Thread Michael Paesold
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 08:06:53PM +0100, Michael Paesold wrote: > A side affect of this newline patch is that all fields are now filled > with > white space up to the displayed column width, even for the last (or only > column). My intention was to

[HACKERS] Spaces in psql output (Was: FW: PGBuildfarm member snake Branch HEAD Status changed)

2006-02-10 Thread Michael Paesold
quot;nice display" output) is unaffected? Best Regards, Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [HACKERS] Tab completion of SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION

2006-01-31 Thread Michael Paesold
ement that. The assumption one-connection-has-one-transaction is probably pretty deeply burried in many backend components. Has this been changed by the prepared-transactions stuff? I may be mistaken, which would be very positive news. Best Regards, Michael Paesold

Re: [HACKERS] 8.0.5 Bug in unique indexes?

2006-01-19 Thread Michael Paesold
Joshua D. Drake wrote: Michael Paesold wrote: You don't user pl/perl, do you -- i.e. I guess you read the latest release notes and the thread here before that? Yes I did. I didn't know that the person was running plPerl. I have verified that they are. We are now going to check if

Re: [HACKERS] 8.0.5 Bug in unique indexes?

2006-01-19 Thread Michael Paesold
Joshua D. Drake wrote: Tom Lane wrote: What's the database's locale? This could be the same problem fixed in 8.0.6, if the locale has weird ideas about what string equality means. lc_collate | C lc_ctype | C You don't user pl/perl, do you -- i.e.

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] TRUNCATE, VACUUM, ANALYZE privileges

2006-01-05 Thread Michael Paesold
on, the whole RELIABILITY changes would be no-ops, no? Just as the CTAS optimization etc. only skip WAL if WAL archiving is turned off. Best Regards, Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

Re: [HACKERS] [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and

2005-12-31 Thread Michael Paesold
mmitting an enclosing transaction. Using pg_restore directly into a database, it is not possible to get a single transaction right now. One has to restore to a file and manually added BEGIN/COMMIT. Just for that I think --single-transaction is a great addition and a missing feature. I think more peo

Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: [HACKERS] Possible savepoint bug)

2005-12-29 Thread Michael Paesold
Tom Lane wrote: Michael Paesold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: This is a theory. The whole database was loaded using pg_restore, I still have the original dump so I will have a look at the dump now. The database actually contains some plperl functions. OK, I think I have reproduced the p

Re: [HACKERS] Possible savepoint bug

2005-12-28 Thread Michael Paesold
Tom Lane wrote: I wrote: Michael Paesold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I am seeing a similar unique index bug here... This is PostgreSQL 8.1.1 on RHEL 3, Intel Xeon (i686). It looks like the problem is that index entries are being inserted out of order. After further investigation, it

Re: [HACKERS] Possible savepoint bug

2005-12-27 Thread Michael Paesold
duled vacuums for now. I could send the index and table files off-list. This is the only effected table right now. It is not updated frequently but is rather static. I upgraded to 8.1.1 around Dec 21, there should have been near zero updates since then until today. Perhaps it's a problem wi

Re: [HACKERS] Regression test horology failure

2005-12-13 Thread Michael Paesold
Tom Lane schrieb: "Michael Paesold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: The tests fail for PST/PDT in 2034. This probably indicates that you've got TZ data reflecting the new US DST rules. We have not updated the pre-8.0 regression test results to deal with that. You

[HACKERS] Regression test horology failure

2005-12-13 Thread Michael Paesold
g the problem would be a good thing. Tom, you are building 7.3 for RedHat, do you see any similar regression failures? Best Regrads, Michael Paesold *** ./expected/horology.out Thu Sep 25 08:58:06 2003 --- ./results/horology.out Tue Dec 13 15:25:07 2005 *** *** 1755,1765 *

Re: [HACKERS] Anyone for adding -fwrapv to our standard CFLAGS?

2005-12-13 Thread Michael Paesold
ould be a portable way to detect overflow, no? Best Regards, Michael Paesold [Tom, I removed you from CC: because your spam filter tends to eat my mail; you should get it through the lists, though.] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: H

Re: [HACKERS] Optional postgres database not so optional in 8.1

2005-11-17 Thread Michael Paesold
ase given on the command line. This does not work, if the postgres database is dropped in 8.1: psql -l template1 psql -l -d template1 of course "psql template1" will just work fine. Best Regards, Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)---

Re: [HACKERS] Optional postgres database not so optional in 8.1

2005-11-17 Thread Michael Paesold
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: What distribution? I've never seen this "postgres" database you speak of. It certainly not on any systems I've used. It's new in 8.1 and is used as the default connection database for createdb, etc. Best

Re: [HACKERS] PG_DUMP and table locking in PG7.4

2005-11-15 Thread Michael Paesold
r readers nor writers will block waiting. So only if you do full table locks in your application (using LOCK TABLE statements), you will suffer from pg_dump backups. Best Regards, Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Have you searche

Re: [HACKERS] Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems

2005-11-08 Thread Michael Paesold
Tom Lane wrote: I wrote: Michael Paesold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I am definatly not going to use -march=pentium4 in any production system. Should I open a bug report with RedHat (gcc vendor)? Yeah, but they'll probably want a smaller test case than "Postgres fail

Re: [HACKERS] Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems

2005-11-08 Thread Michael Paesold
. Just for the record (and those interested): using 'CFLAGS=-O2 -mcpu=pentium4 -march=pentium4 -mfpmath=sse -msse2' actually passes the regression tests. Best Regards, Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [HACKERS] Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems

2005-11-07 Thread Michael Paesold
or)? Best Regards, Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [HACKERS] Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems

2005-11-07 Thread Michael Paesold
Michael Paesold wrote: On Nov 7, 2005, at 17:24 , Michael Paesold wrote: Using both PostgreSQL 8.1.0 and CVS current of Nov 7, 9:00 am CET I get a regression failure in the interval tests. I am no export for the interval type, but the expected "9 days 28 hours" seem wrong,

Re: [HACKERS] Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems

2005-11-07 Thread Michael Paesold
Michael Glaesemann wrote: On Nov 7, 2005, at 17:24 , Michael Paesold wrote: Using both PostgreSQL 8.1.0 and CVS current of Nov 7, 9:00 am CET I get a regression failure in the interval tests. I am no export for the interval type, but the expected "9 days 28 hours" seem wrong,

[HACKERS] Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems wrong)

2005-11-07 Thread Michael Paesold
Using both PostgreSQL 8.1.0 and CVS current of Nov 7, 9:00 am CET I get a regression failure in the interval tests. I am no export for the interval type, but the expected "9 days 28 hours" seem wrong, don't they? The actual value seems to be the same. Is it possible that this is broken on the

Re: [HACKERS] expanded \df+ display broken in beta4

2005-10-26 Thread Michael Paesold
Bruce Momjian wrote: Michael Paesold wrote: Tom Lane wrote: "Michael Paesold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Robert Treat wrote: ISTM even a GUC to enable/disable would have been better scheme than what we have now; we are basically leaving no options for those who found

Re: [HACKERS] expanded \df+ display broken in beta4

2005-10-26 Thread Michael Paesold
Tom Lane wrote: "Michael Paesold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Robert Treat wrote: ISTM even a GUC to enable/disable would have been better scheme than what we have now; we are basically leaving no options for those who found the old behavior useful, while what we had befor

Re: [HACKERS] expanded \df+ display broken in beta4

2005-10-25 Thread Michael Paesold
the old behavior useful, while what we had before would at least let people switch back and forth. I think Robert is right here and the new behaviour is a step backwards. Best Regards, Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] [BUGS] BUG #1962: ECPG and VARCHAR

2005-10-13 Thread Michael Paesold
Tom Lane wrote: "Michael Paesold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Can you remember regressions in stable branches in the past? Yes. Relax. If this were a data-corruption-in-the-backend issue, I might feel that it mandates an immediate re-release. But it isn't and it doesn

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] [BUGS] BUG #1962: ECPG and VARCHAR

2005-10-13 Thread Michael Paesold
quot; (i.e. for the next major bug fixes) is not the correct answer here. IMHO, the latest released version should be known best in all components. Best Regards, Michael Paesold Bruce Momjian wrote: Michael Fuhr wrote: On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:49:20AM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote: > ecpg in

Re: [HACKERS] Updated documentation for new sequence binding

2005-10-02 Thread Michael Paesold
ASE-8-1 Sorry, this is a better URL: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/release.html#RELEASE-8-1 Btw. I think the header "Add proper sequence function dependencies for DEFAULT" is in the wrong font, i.e. it's all monospace. Best Regards Michael Paesold

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems

2005-09-28 Thread Michael Paesold
am not sure how easy that is considering schema.sequence.nextval. Just a thought. Best Regards, Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [HACKERS] State of support for back PG branches

2005-09-26 Thread Michael Paesold
recommend it. Also from a marketing statepoint -- having back branches supported for a visible amount of time increases people's confident in PostgreSQL and it's stability. Best Regards, Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [HACKERS] "expected authentication request from server, but

2005-09-26 Thread Michael Paesold
amount of transactions. Best Regards, Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [HACKERS] What has happened to pgxs?

2005-09-23 Thread Michael Paesold
s not append postgresql in that case? That would be the least invasive fix for the Windows case, I guess, where the default installation directory contains "PostgreSQL". Best Regards, Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Re: [HACKERS] What has happened to pgxs?

2005-09-22 Thread Michael Paesold
installer project on pgfoundry. pgxs should work. Best Regards, Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug results in ambiguous errors/behaviour

2005-09-22 Thread Michael Paesold
operator fails. It comes down to the question if the query is valid syntax in the first place. The answers PostgreSQL gives are correct nevertheless. Best Regards, Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [HACKERS] Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches

2005-09-15 Thread Michael Paesold
here and see if it gives the same result. If so I could try to run with oprofile if you can give me a quick start. Best Regards, Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

[HACKERS] Bug with cursor declaration in PL/pgSQL in CVS tip?

2005-09-14 Thread Michael Paesold
GSQL; I get: ERROR: syntax error at or near "," at character 237 LINE 9: credit_cursor CURSOR (p_account integer, p_reference integ... The same function works perfectly well in 7.4.8 and 8.0.3. A bug? Best Regards, Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)-

  1   2   >