[PHP-DEV] Interface to RSA Crypto-C library?

Hi, Was just wondering if anyone's done an interface to the RSA Crypto-C library. OpenSSL documentation is very sparse, cant understand head or tail of it, so I decided to take up RSA Tx, Vinod. -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/u

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP-SOAP features

On Thu, 23 May 2002, brad lafountain wrote: > Ok, > > I know not too many people are familure with my extension so I am going to go > over some stuff that it does do and stuff it doesn't. > > The plans i have for this extension are more than just a simple soap/rpc > function calls. I want to

[PHP-DEV] Re: Re: [PHP] Full-Duplex communication

LOL.. I like the color red BTW. Let me explain my project more in detail. This system is an Instant messaging system, with the backed running on apache / php / mysql. The front end client is a COM component that communicates with the backend, and interfaces with an MFC app. Now since Instan

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

> >> I'd really like stuff like this to build out of the box in PHP. > >> Bundling expat was great because we didn't have to think about it > >> anymore. My impression is that libxml2 is rarely installed by default > >> (GNOME still uses 1.8 for instance). But I guess we'll have to deal > >> wit

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > Ok, [EMAIL PROTECTED] now exists. If it turns out that a general "web > services" list is needed, we'll create that, but for more let's simply > move all the SOAP-specific discussion to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing > list. > > Subscribe to it by sending a subscribe reque

[PHP-DEV] soap email list

Everyone who subscribes, please send an email to the list so we know. Thanks, Shane -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

[PHP-DEV] PHP-SOAP features

Ok, I know not too many people are familure with my extension so I am going to go over some stuff that it does do and stuff it doesn't. The plans i have for this extension are more than just a simple soap/rpc function calls. I want to build a frame work that people can deploy existing php obje

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

At 01:39 24/05/2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: >Well, HTML is an intrical part of the Web and I don't see how that can be >compared to SOAP at all. In order for SOAP to be part of the Web it needs >to conform to the HTTP protocol and to the concepts that defines the Web. >It doesn't do that at all to

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

Ok, [EMAIL PROTECTED] now exists. If it turns out that a general "web services" list is needed, we'll create that, but for more let's simply move all the SOAP-specific discussion to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. Subscribe to it by sending a subscribe request to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Rasmus

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

At 16:21 23/05/2002 -0700, Shane Caraveo wrote: >So this is what I propose... > >setup [EMAIL PROTECTED] for further conversation. Yep. >As a starting point > >PEAR::SOAP is a script wrapper around a C level extension. It's >available in absence of the C extension, and for additional featur

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

So this is what I propose... setup [EMAIL PROTECTED] for further conversation. As a starting point PEAR::SOAP is a script wrapper around a C level extension. It's available in absence of the C extension, and for additional features that don't make sence to implement in C, or for fast exten

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

At 02:04 24/05/2002 +0300, Andi Gutmans wrote: >I think the point Zeev was making is that in real life these days many >decision makers are looking for the web services buzz word when choosing a >technology. Telling them "PHP supports web services" can only be a good >thing in the fight against

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

I think the point Zeev was making is that in real life these days many decision makers are looking for the web services buzz word when choosing a technology. Telling them "PHP supports web services" can only be a good thing in the fight against MS and other giants. In many people's perception

Re: [PHP-DEV] Errors when building HEAD

On Thu, 23 May 2002 12:33:12 -0400, Jon Parise wrote: >On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 09:44:35AM +0200, Martin Jansen wrote: > >> On Wed, 22 May 2002 09:21:47 +0200, Markus Fischer wrote: >> >> >autoconf 2.53 isn't supposed to work. Try with 2.13 >> >> After downgrading to 2.13, I now get the erro

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: Tokenizer weirdness

it's not just windows. > -Original Message- > From: Stig S. Bakken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:28 PM > To: Sebastian Bergmann > Cc: Andrei Zmievski; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PHP Developers > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Tokenizer weirdness > > > On Thu, 2002-05-

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

> At 00:08 24/05/2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > >I really don't like the term Web Services. SOAP is an RPC mechanism and > >has nothing to do with the web despite what M$ would like to have you > >think. > > I think that's kind of like saying HTML has nothing to do with the web, but > anyway, perc

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

At 15:36 23/05/2002 -0700, brad lafountain wrote: >--- "Stig S. Bakken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 00:10, brad lafountain wrote: > > > > > > --- "Stig S. Bakken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 23:28, brad lafountain wrote: > > > > > One reason i

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

On Thu, 23 May 2002 15:27:00 -0700, Shane Caraveo wrote: >Markus Wolff wrote: >> The best thinkable solutions would be: >> a) Bundle a library like PEAR::SOAP with PHP that is modified in a >>way that it automatically detects if the xmlrpc-epi extension is >>installed. If so, PEAR::SOAP o

Re: [PHP-DEV] fopen(); question

On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 14:24, Jose Jeria wrote: > I am new to PHP and I have a simple question about fopen > > For example: > $tmp = fopen("testfile.txt", "r"); > > If the file is not found i get an error. ("No such file or directory") > So there is no point in checking for this like this: > > i

Re: [PHP-DEV] Need help with the build system

Thats it! Downgraded to autoconf-2.13 and works like a charm now. Finally i can get to coding :) Thanks, Hans At 21:14 23-5-2002 +0200, you wrote: > 2.5x version proved to do not work well with the build > system. Try 2.13 for a start. > > - Markus > >On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 07:39:

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

--- "Stig S. Bakken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 00:10, brad lafountain wrote: > > > > --- "Stig S. Bakken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 23:28, brad lafountain wrote: > > > > One reason is xmlrpc doesn't have everything that goes along with soap.

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

On Thu, 23 May 2002 20:08:48 +0200, Lukas Smith wrote: >It sounds to me like something like webservices.php.net would be in >order. I don't think that having yet another subdomain does make much sense. Actually I prefer to have documentation for whatever comes out of this discussion in the PHP o

Re: [PHP-DEV] Full-duplex communication

On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 23:59, Stig S. Bakken wrote: > On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 14:39, Vinod Panicker wrote: > > Hi Faisal, > > > > Tx for ur thoughts... > > > > On Thu, 23 May 2002 Faisal Nasim wrote : > > >Hi, > > > > > >Why not simply use Apache to forward to the request to your PHP > > >script or

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

Unless some work has been done on it, I found it very lacking. Many things are hardcoded in C that would make it hardly interoperable with other implementations. Shane > In fact, xmlrpc-epi also supports SOAP: > > ---[SNIP]--- > As of Sept. 27, 2001, experimental support for SOAP v 1.1 has b

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Tokenizer weirdness

On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 19:26, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > Andrei Zmievski wrote: > > That's not what I get. Did you try the latest CVS version? > > Yes. Windows issue? Does anyone else using Windows see this? - Stig -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, vis

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

Markus Wolff wrote: > Stig S. Bakken said: > >>PHP already has SOAP support bundled in the xmlrpc extension, which >>is built upon the xmlrpc-epi library that we bundle. Why can't >>people improve that instead of re-inventing more wheels in all >>shapes and sizes? When we bundle a library, we s

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

brad lafountain said: > One reason is xmlrpc doesn't have everything that goes along with > soap. meaning WSDL UDDI WebServiceSecurity. > > and as far as i understand that xmlrpc doesn't work on windows. > > and with some benchmarks phpsoap so far was 3 times as fast as > xmlrpc. In fact, xmlrpc-

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 00:10, brad lafountain wrote: > > --- "Stig S. Bakken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 23:28, brad lafountain wrote: > > > One reason is xmlrpc doesn't have everything that goes along with soap. > > > meaning WSDL UDDI WebServiceSecurity. > > > > WSDL

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 23:38, Markus Wolff wrote: > Stig S. Bakken said: > > PHP already has SOAP support bundled in the xmlrpc extension, which > > is built upon the xmlrpc-epi library that we bundle. Why can't > > people improve that instead of re-inventing more wheels in all > > shapes and size

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

--- "Stig S. Bakken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 23:28, brad lafountain wrote: > > One reason is xmlrpc doesn't have everything that goes along with soap. > > meaning WSDL UDDI WebServiceSecurity. > > WSDL can be implemented through the introspection stuff in ext/xmlrpc.

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 23:28, brad lafountain wrote: > One reason is xmlrpc doesn't have everything that goes along with soap. > meaning WSDL UDDI WebServiceSecurity. WSDL can be implemented through the introspection stuff in ext/xmlrpc. It's just about describing/documenting the available inter

Re: [PHP-DEV] Full-duplex communication

On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 14:39, Vinod Panicker wrote: > Hi Faisal, > > Tx for ur thoughts... > > On Thu, 23 May 2002 Faisal Nasim wrote : > >Hi, > > > >Why not simply use Apache to forward to the request to your PHP > >script or 'other program' and deploy threads for whatever > >process > >you wan

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

> Stig S. Bakken said: > > PHP already has SOAP support bundled in the xmlrpc extension, which > > is built upon the xmlrpc-epi library that we bundle. Why can't > > people improve that instead of re-inventing more wheels in all > > shapes and sizes? When we bundle a library, we should use it. >

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

Stig S. Bakken said: > PHP already has SOAP support bundled in the xmlrpc extension, which > is built upon the xmlrpc-epi library that we bundle. Why can't > people improve that instead of re-inventing more wheels in all > shapes and sizes? When we bundle a library, we should use it. > > - Stig

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

Well my extension i was going for a solid implmentation of soap that could run out of the box. With many features and tightly intergrated with zend and other extensions like domxml and php-streams. I think my extension has some value here. I would like to see my soap be the soap implementation tha

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

> I guess I am confused like many of our users. Yeah this is a huge problem. Most likely this is also why we have so many separate efforts, because everyone felt this area was lacking and felt this area needed some serious effort. That’s why I also think we need a place where all efforts are lin

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

Well lets not drift off into a discussion which solution is more feasible. I think it can't be disputed that xmlrpc also has its followers and therefore should see some support that would fit best into a mailinglist with soap. Best regards, Lukas Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] __

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

> I really don't like the term Web Services. SOAP is an RPC mechanism and > has nothing to do with the web despite what M$ would like to have you > think. Why not let M$ marketing money work for us? I had an easier task selling a project when I said that PHP could talk to "web services". What re

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

One reason is xmlrpc doesn't have everything that goes along with soap. meaning WSDL UDDI WebServiceSecurity. and as far as i understand that xmlrpc doesn't work on windows. and with some benchmarks phpsoap so far was 3 times as fast as xmlrpc. - Brad --- "Stig S. Bakken" <[EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

I think, by the way, that this could be a good time to drop the php- prefix from new mailing list names. Do we really need to point out that it's PHP related, when the domain is lists.php.net? :) Zeev At 00:20 24/05/2002, Lukas Smith wrote: >Shane also did not like the term and I can see wher

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

At 00:08 24/05/2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: >I really don't like the term Web Services. SOAP is an RPC mechanism and >has nothing to do with the web despite what M$ would like to have you >think. I think that's kind of like saying HTML has nothing to do with the web, but anyway, perception is ev

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

Shane also did not like the term and I can see where you all are coming from. But I think the mailinglist should cover a broader scope than just soap and this is usually done under the name "web services" php-xml-based-rpc@ this could mislead to making it sound xml-rpc centric and its not really

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

Stig, I am not keeping up with which PHP SOAP implementations are complete and which are not. I guess I am confused like many of our users. I didn't say we should reinvent the wheel. All I said is that everyone should get together and standardize PHP's SOAP support and get it documented and adv

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

PHP already has SOAP support bundled in the xmlrpc extension, which is built upon the xmlrpc-epi library that we bundle. Why can't people improve that instead of re-inventing more wheels in all shapes and sizes? When we bundle a library, we should use it. - Stig On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 17:52, A

Re: [PHP-DEV] Full-duplex communication

I suggest you take a look at BEEP, which is meant for "full-duplex" communication. HTTP simply isn't. http://www.alltheweb.com/search?q=beep+protocol - Stig On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 12:16, Vinod Panicker wrote: > Hi, > > I had a peculiar requirement. I need the ability to send > asynchronou

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

Then go for soap, that's fine too. The most important thing is that we manage to get good SOAP support into PHP which will work out of the box and can be documented officially in the manual. Andi At 14:08 23/05/2002 -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: >I really don't like the term Web Services. SOAP

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

I really don't like the term Web Services. SOAP is an RPC mechanism and has nothing to do with the web despite what M$ would like to have you think. -Rasmus On Fri, 24 May 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote: > As I mentioned earlier I am a big +1 for it. > Probably php-webservices@ is even better as it

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

As I mentioned earlier I am a big +1 for it. Probably php-webservices@ is even better as it covers more and sounds good :) Andi At 11:05 23/05/2002 -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: >So do we want a [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list? I can set it up if >you say the word. > >-Rasmus > >On Thu, 23 May 20

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

Ok here I am I do already have some email lists up for my extension. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've been doing ALOT of work with my extension. And i currently do use it live at work. We have a java interface talking to "SoapObjects" on the server. This is extremly powerfull cause

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP] Full-Duplex communication

Not to be argumentative, but what you're trying to do is just so amazingly much more complicated than any of my suggestions. Maybe I haven't communicated it well, it maybe there's some requirement to your project that I don't understand. Why not just write a listener in PHP and redirect to it? It

[PHP-DEV] zvals and references

In some code in the COM extension, there is a function that converts COM objects into something that PHP can use as a zval. There is a particular case where the COM object might be one that PHP created as a wrapper for a zval. Given that the code can use some magic to extract the zval * from the

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

i'm under contract. i'd definitely contribute as much as possible on the list though :) i think these are excellent steps for PHP in this area. i get an amazing amount of NuSOAP-related email every day from developers who (for whatever reason) think that SOAP is the shiznit, and are creating all

Re: [PHP-DEV] Need help with the build system

2.5x version proved to do not work well with the build system. Try 2.13 for a start. - Markus On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 07:39:02PM +0200, Hans Rakers wrote : > > Sorry for replying to my own message, but i realized i may have provided > too little info about my setup. > > Im using

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

+1 :-) On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 11:21:39AM -0700, Shane Caraveo wrote : > I would say go for it, but I want to hear from some others first to know > that I wont be talking to myself on an email list ;) > > Shane > > Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > >So do we want a [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list?

[PHP-DEV] embedded mysql (rather than RDBMS)

Hey, You know that mysql now includes an embedded mysql "server" library? Well, a few months ago I decided to take a look - it was experimental then (and probably still is) so I had to build it myself. Then I needed to add support to PHP, so I copied the mysql extension code and renamed all the

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

> Ugh, can't stand 'web services' I know what you mean. I just think that soap would sort of imply it's not xml-rpc etc ... which would not make sense ... On the other hand since there is no php-xmlrpc@ people will probably try php-soap@ anyways > But anyway, I think this information > needs to

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

Ugh, can't stand 'web services'. But anyway, I think this information needs to go into regular documentation on php.net and pear.php.net first, then if there is realy a need for it expand into an additional site. Shane Lukas Smith wrote: > It sounds to me like something like webservices.php.ne

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

I would say go for it, but I want to hear from some others first to know that I wont be talking to myself on an email list ;) Shane Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > So do we want a [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list? I can set it up if > you say the word. > > -Rasmus > > On Thu, 23 May 2002, Shane Carave

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

I want one (but should this not be a bit more generic as in [EMAIL PROTECTED]) .. plus webservices.php.net Or webservicetools ... dunno Best regards, Lukas Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ DybNet Internet Solutions GbR Reuchlinstr. 10-11 Gebäude 4 1.OG Raum 6 (4.1.6)

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

It sounds to me like something like webservices.php.net would be in order. I don't have a huge deal of time to really push this forward. I will provide a simple list to start and that will just be a static page for now and that people can expand as things go on (dunno how permissions for php.net s

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

So do we want a [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list? I can set it up if you say the word. -Rasmus On Thu, 23 May 2002, Shane Caraveo wrote: > > I would be happy to lead the effort on the soap front. I've spoken a > bit with Brad about combining our efforts but got sidetracked over the > last coupl

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

I would be happy to lead the effort on the soap front. I've spoken a bit with Brad about combining our efforts but got sidetracked over the last couple weeks so haven't followed up on that. I'm also not sure whether Deitrich is tied to NuSphere with his work, it'd be nice if we could get hi

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

Am Thu, 23 May 2002 10:44:36 -0700 schrieb Shane Caraveo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > SOAP::Lite has the same problem, in fact with simple stuff we've done at > work it's proven to be less interoperable that PEAR::SOAP when it comes > to dealing with .Net. Python is also very lacking in the SOAP are

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

Markus Wolff wrote: > Am Thu, 23 May 2002 17:12:34 +0200 schrieb "Lukas Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >>So feature-wise is PHP on par with SOAP::Lite? >>From what I have heard people seemed to have talked quite favourably >>about SOAP::Lite. >> >>I assume documentation-wise PHP lags behind. >

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PATCH] Allow preg_split to capture offsets

On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 12:28:02PM -0500, Andrei Zmievski wrote: > David, > > > Enclosed is a patch to allow PCRE's preg_split to return an array of > > (match, offset) pairs, if PREG_SPLIT_OFFSET_CAPTURE is or'd into the > > flags parameter. Submitted for inclusion, rejection, extensive flaming,

Re: [PHP-DEV] Need help with the build system

Sorry for replying to my own message, but i realized i may have provided too little info about my setup. Im using Slackware 8.0 with kernel 2.4.18 autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.50 automake (GNU automake) 1.4-p4 ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.4 (1.920 2001/04/24 23:26:18) Thanks, Hans At 15:26 23-5-20

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: Tokenizer weirdness

I just gave this a go and got: :~:# php -q -f t.php Array ( [0] => Array ( [0] => 354 [1] => Array ( [0] => 305 [1] => phpinfo ) [2] => ( [3] => ) [4] => ; [5] => Array ( [0] => 357

[PHP-DEV] Re: Tokenizer weirdness

Andrei Zmievski wrote: > That's not what I get. Did you try the latest CVS version? Yes. -- Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/ Did I help you? Consider a gift: http://wishlist.sebastian-bergmann.de/ -- PHP Development Mailing Li

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PATCH] Allow preg_split to capture offsets

David, > Enclosed is a patch to allow PCRE's preg_split to return an array of > (match, offset) pairs, if PREG_SPLIT_OFFSET_CAPTURE is or'd into the > flags parameter. Submitted for inclusion, rejection, extensive flaming, > or suggestions. :) I've applied the patch with some modifications. Nota

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

pear/SOAP seems to work pretty well. There are few people out there that know more about SOAP than Shane and I am quite comfortable having him spearheading this effort. We can easily set up a php-soap mailing list if enough people are interested. -Rasmus On Thu, 23 May 2002, Lukas Smith wrote:

[PHP-DEV] Re: Tokenizer weirdness

> No: '));?> > > Array > ( > [0] => Array > ( > [0] => 353 > [1] => Array > ( > [0] => 304 > [1] => phpinfo > ) > > [2] => ( > [3] => ) > [4] => ; >

Re: [PHP-DEV] Errors when building HEAD

On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 09:44:35AM +0200, Martin Jansen wrote: > On Wed, 22 May 2002 09:21:47 +0200, Markus Fischer wrote: > > >autoconf 2.53 isn't supposed to work. Try with 2.13 > > After downgrading to 2.13, I now get the error messages on > can find in the attached buildconf_errors.txt.

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

Am Thu, 23 May 2002 18:03:43 +0200 schrieb "Lukas Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I think it would make sense to create such a mailinglist. > As I am still fairly busy with working on a merge of Metabase and PEAR > DB called MDB (blatant plug :-) ) I can't spend as much time as I would > wish on th

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

Yeah, I keep seeing PHP SOAP and XMLRPC being announce packages everywhere. But incompatible API's will not benefit PHP much and the efforts are simply redundant. I think it would make sense to create such a mailinglist. As I am still fairly busy with working on a merge of Metabase and PEAR DB ca

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

I think it's important to have a main stream soap implementation bundled with PHP and not a zillion different implementations floating around. If there is enough interest we could setup a Soap mailing list where interested people could cooperate possibly basing the "official" PHP Soap implement

Re: [PHP-DEV] XPath

On Thu, 23 May 2002, Michael Dransfield wrote: > whilst we are on the 'X' topic, does anyone know of an XPath > implementation. I know of some (quite good) php classes > [http://sourceforge.net/projects/phpxpath/], but no compiled extensions. what's wrong with http://www.php.net/manual/en/funct

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

hi brad lafountain is working on a Soap extension which is not far from being stable. he made a good use of WSDL ... you should have look to http://phpsoaptoolkit.sourceforge.net/phpsoap/ > -Original Message- > From: Markus Wolff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: jeudi 23 mai 2002 15:

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

Am Thu, 23 May 2002 17:12:34 +0200 schrieb "Lukas Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > So feature-wise is PHP on par with SOAP::Lite? > From what I have heard people seemed to have talked quite favourably > about SOAP::Lite. > > I assume documentation-wise PHP lags behind. I have no knowledge of Perl

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

Am Thu, 23 May 2002 14:57:45 +0200 schrieb "Lukas Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > What is the current status in terms of SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL in php? > > How mature are the solutions? > When will they be ready for primetime? > Does anyone already use them in production (that can be used to show o

Re: [PHP-DEV] status of apache_hooks?

On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 07:53:27AM -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > is there anyone actively working on the apache_hooks code? > > Nobody showed any interest in it so I put it on the back burner for a > while. ok, well i'm very interested, and willing to do the coding, too. months ago i submitt

[PHP-DEV] XPath

whilst we are on the 'X' topic, does anyone know of an XPath implementation. I know of some (quite good) php classes [http://sourceforge.net/projects/phpxpath/], but no compiled extensions. Are there any plans for this in the future? Mike At 17:04 23/05/2002 +0200, Markus Wolff wrote: >Am T

Re: [PHP-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

I think Epinions.com are using the xmlrpc extension in primetime - they wrote it. --Wez. On 23/05/02, "Lukas Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Aloha, > > What is the current status in terms of SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL in php? > > How mature are the solutions? > When will they be ready for prime

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

So feature-wise is PHP on par with SOAP::Lite? >From what I have heard people seemed to have talked quite favourably about SOAP::Lite. I assume documentation-wise PHP lags behind. Best regards, Lukas Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ DybNet Internet Solutions GbR Reuchlin

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

Am Thu, 23 May 2002 15:41:28 +0200 schrieb "Lukas Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I guess when it comes to maturity, all available implementations in > any > > language still have a long way to go. > > Is there anything can maybe be pulled from SOAP::Lite or do they have > similar issues? Same

RE: [PHP-DEV] PDFLIB & pdf_show_boxed

Title: RE: [PHP-DEV] PDFLIB & pdf_show_boxed Yup. You're asking on the wrong list. :P Try php-general. Mike Robinson IT/Developer - Torstar Media Group Television Phone: 416.945.8786 Fax: 416.869.4566 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Hugo Wetterberg [mai

Re: [PHP-DEV] status of apache_hooks?

> is there anyone actively working on the apache_hooks code? Nobody showed any interest in it so I put it on the back burner for a while. -Rasmus -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

[PHP-DEV] status of apache_hooks?

hi! is there anyone actively working on the apache_hooks code? regards, -lukas -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

[PHP-DEV] PDFLIB & pdf_show_boxed

Hi, I've got some problems with generating dynamic pdf's. This is how I use show_boxed: pdf_show_boxed ($p, "Hi. How are you? Hope you're ok.", 150.0, 800.0, 350.0, 500.0, "left"); It all seems fine to me, but I can't get it to output anything. If i change it to show_xy and remove the last th

Re: Re: [PHP-DEV] Full-duplex communication

Cool.. exactly the kind of info that i was looking for... Tx a lot, i'll check and get back to you Tx, Vinod. On Thu, 23 May 2002 Faisal Nasim wrote : >Vinod, >On Thu, 23 May 2002 Faisal Nasim >wrote : >Hi, >Why not simply use Apache to forward to the request to your PHP >script or 'other progr

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PEAR-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

> I guess when it comes to maturity, all available implementations in any > language still have a long way to go. Is there anything can maybe be pulled from SOAP::Lite or do they have similar issues? Best regards, Lukas Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ DybNet Internet Sol

[PHP-DEV] Need help with the build system

Hello all, I'm trying to make a module for php-4.2.1 but i'm having difficulties with the build system. I perform the following steps: 1. extract a fresh source tree (php-4.2.1) 2. go to ext/ and run ./ext_skel --extname=mymodule 3. edit config.m4 and uncomment some lines to make this: PHP_A

[PHP-DEV] opendir security hole

hi i am creating a webbased filemanager for uploading files to the database, to determin which dir i upload to i have the directory in the query string ie ?dir=blah , i have found a security flaw where if you type dir=../../../../ it will show you the root dir of the server , how can i lock into a

[PHP-DEV] SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL

Aloha, What is the current status in terms of SOAP, XMLRPC and WSDL in php? How mature are the solutions? When will they be ready for primetime? Does anyone already use them in production (that can be used to show off how great the support is) or are there any other prominent examples? (I know t

Re: [PHP-DEV] Full-duplex communication

Hi Faisal, Tx for ur thoughts... On Thu, 23 May 2002 Faisal Nasim wrote : >Hi, > >Why not simply use Apache to forward to the request to your PHP >script or 'other program' and deploy threads for whatever >process >you want to run in the background? I dont want to run anything else in the back

[PHP-DEV] fopen(); question

I am new to PHP and I have a simple question about fopen For example: $tmp = fopen("testfile.txt", "r"); If the file is not found i get an error. ("No such file or directory") So there is no point in checking for this like this: if($tmp) // statements Am I doing something wrong here? -- PH

Re: [PHP-DEV] Full-duplex communication

What i'm trying to leverage on is the socket that is left open. Since it is left open, i can write() to it, not from a php script necessarily, but another application. And since it is a custom client, i can have complete control over it. Developing a multi-threaded or listening server using

Re: Re: [PHP-DEV] Full-duplex communication

On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 09:56:22AM -, Vinod Panicker wrote: > But what i want is the socket which is used by Apache to send data > to the client, which is on a keep-alive connection, so that some > other program, or a php script can send data asynchronously to the > client. mind you, the

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP] Full-Duplex communication

Hi Evan, What you said did make sense, and complements my knowledge of sockets. But what i'm not sure of is this - if i construct my own packet and send it across, presuming that i do have the ip address and port number of the client on which it is reading, will the client accept it as a leg

Re: Re: [PHP-DEV] Full-duplex communication

Hi Dave, Thanks for the suggestion. But i really dont wanna go in for an infinite loop - just a hopeless waste of resources. I didnt say that a Keep-Alive connection would mean a Full-Duplex connection - i know how keep-alive works, as well as HTTP. I know HTTP is based on a request-respon

Re: [PHP-DEV] Unix Time

Sorry, but this developer list is not the appropriate forum for asking support questions. Your problem does not imply a bug in PHP itself. For a list of more appropriate places to ask for help using PHP, please visit http://www.php.net/support.php Thank you for your interest in PHP. On Thu, 2

  1   2   >