On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 22:38 -0500, Paul M Foster wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:13:11PM +1100, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:18:18 +, a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk (Ashley
Sheridan) wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 10:16 +1100, Ross McKay wrote:
...
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 22:38 -0500, Paul M Foster wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:13:11PM +1100, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:18:18 +, a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk (Ashley
Sheridan) wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 10:16 +1100, Ross McKay wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
There's a good reason for OpenOffice having some difficulties with MS
Office documents. Back when MS rushed through getting their document
standard ratified by ISO (which itself is a whole other story) they
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 16:03 -0500, Andrew Ballard wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
There's a good reason for OpenOffice having some difficulties with MS
Office documents. Back when MS rushed through getting their document
standard
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 10:16 +1100, Ross McKay wrote:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:12:01 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
I'm doing quite a bit more work in public sector these days. Recently ne
department finally did away with IE6 and moved to IE7. Here's what I had
to do to accomodate this
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:18:18 +, a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk (Ashley Sheridan)
wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 10:16 +1100, Ross McKay wrote:
...
There's a good reason for OpenOffice having some difficulties with MS
Office documents. Back when MS rushed through getting their document
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:13:11PM +1100, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:18:18 +, a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk (Ashley
Sheridan) wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 10:16 +1100, Ross McKay wrote:
...
There's a good reason for OpenOffice having some difficulties
Lester Caine wrote:
Since a large section of our USER base is still tied to W2k and does not
have access to install other software, the call for IE6 to die is STILL
somewhat premature!
What is needed is someone to kick M$ to sort the mess out by at least
allowing IE8 to install on W2k
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 07:02 -0600, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
Since a large section of our USER base is still tied to W2k and does not
have access to install other software, the call for IE6 to die is STILL
somewhat premature!
What is needed is someone to kick M$ to sort
On 10 February 2010 13:02, Ashley Sheridan a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
I've not had any personal experience with the public sector, but I have
heard stories from those who have. By all accounts, it seems that most
of the public sector is still stuck in the dark ages with regards to
At 7:02 AM -0600 2/10/10, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
Since a large section of our USER base is still tied to W2k and does not
have access to install other software, the call for IE6 to die is STILL
somewhat premature!
What is needed is someone to kick M$ to sort the mess out
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 09:41 -0500, tedd wrote:
At 7:02 AM -0600 2/10/10, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
Since a large section of our USER base is still tied to W2k and does not
have access to install other software, the call for IE6 to die is STILL
somewhat premature!
Lester Caine wrote:
James McLean wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:26 PM, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:39:03 +0100, joc...@iamjochem.com (Jochem Maas) wrote:
as for using IE6 ... WTF ... you do realise this is essentially a web
developers mailing list right?
The
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
I've not had any personal experience with the public sector, but I have
heard stories from those who have. By all accounts, it seems that most
of the public sector is still stuck in the dark ages with regards to
technology, which could go some way to explaining the abysmal
Richard Quadling wrote:
On 10 February 2010 13:02, Ashley Sheridan a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
I've not had any personal experience with the public sector, but I have
heard stories from those who have. By all accounts, it seems that most
of the public sector is still stuck in the dark ages
From: Robert Cummings
Lester Caine wrote:
James McLean wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:26 PM, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:39:03 +0100, joc...@iamjochem.com (Jochem
Maas) wrote:
as for using IE6 ... WTF ... you do realise this is essentially a
web
developers mailing
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 10:17 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
From: Robert Cummings
Lester Caine wrote:
James McLean wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:26 PM, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:39:03 +0100, joc...@iamjochem.com (Jochem
Maas) wrote:
as for using IE6 ... WTF
Bob McConnell wrote:
From: Robert Cummings
Lester Caine wrote:
James McLean wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:26 PM, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:39:03 +0100, joc...@iamjochem.com (Jochem
Maas) wrote:
as for using IE6 ... WTF ... you do realise this is essentially a
From: Ashley Sheridan
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 10:17 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
From: Robert Cummings
Lester Caine wrote:
James McLean wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:26 PM, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:39:03 +0100, joc...@iamjochem.com (Jochem
Maas) wrote:
as for
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 11:20 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
From: Ashley Sheridan
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 10:17 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
From: Robert Cummings
Lester Caine wrote:
James McLean wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:26 PM, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010
Bob McConnell wrote:
Our SOP is to generate standards compliant pages, validate them with
Firefox and the HTML Validator add-on, then deal with the deviant
browsers. It's a lot less work than trying to do it the other way
around. There are a few minor issues, such as W3C still refusing to
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
The W3C validator rejects that autocomplete attribute because it still
isn't in any valid standard. Some browsers have introduced it, and PCI
requires it to be there for browsers that recognise it, but it's not a
good security feature, as browsers don't have to honor it
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 10:20 -0800, Michael A. Peters wrote:
Bob McConnell wrote:
Our SOP is to generate standards compliant pages, validate them with
Firefox and the HTML Validator add-on, then deal with the deviant
browsers. It's a lot less work than trying to do it the other way
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Bob McConnell wrote:
Our SOP is to generate standards compliant pages, validate them with
Firefox and the HTML Validator add-on, then deal with the deviant
browsers. It's a lot less work than trying to do it the other way
around. There are a few minor issues, such as
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 13:25 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Bob McConnell wrote:
Our SOP is to generate standards compliant pages, validate them with
Firefox and the HTML Validator add-on, then deal with the deviant
browsers. It's a lot less work than trying
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 13:25 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Bob McConnell wrote:
Our SOP is to generate standards compliant pages, validate them with
Firefox and the HTML Validator add-on, then deal with the deviant
browsers. It's a lot less
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
What about search engines? Will there be any impact on these,
particularly with regards to semantic content?
I expect semantic markup to (eventually) improve how pages are indexed.
Also, are there any browsers that would fall over with unknown tags? I
know IE
Robert Cummings wrote:
Just a word of thought... if you're doing styling... use classes and not
IDs. Use of IDs for styling is very often indicative of inexperience,
inability, or lack of understanding with respect to CSS.
I use ID when there will only be one element that needs to be
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 02:56:36PM +1100, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
snip
The interesting things in my websites go on behind-the-scenes, in the PHP,
and produce
relatively straightforward HTML. I have avoided the well-known bugs in IE6,
and think my
webpages display correctly on any of
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Just a word of thought... if you're doing styling... use classes and
not IDs. Use of IDs for styling is very often indicative of
inexperience, inability, or lack of understanding with respect to CSS.
I use ID when there will only be one
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Just a word of thought... if you're doing styling... use classes and not
IDs. Use of IDs for styling is very often indicative of inexperience,
inability, or lack of understanding with respect to CSS.
I use ID when there will only be one
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Just a word of thought... if you're doing styling... use classes and
not IDs. Use of IDs for styling is very often indicative of
inexperience, inability, or lack of understanding with respect to CSS.
I use ID when
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
Since a large section of our USER base is still tied to W2k and does not
have access to install other software, the call for IE6 to die is STILL
somewhat premature!
What is needed is someone to kick M$ to sort the mess out by at least
allowing IE8 to
Robert Cummings wrote:
Many government documents have the concept of aside as appearing
through the document and contextually near to the information to which
the aside relates. The entire sidebar seems a bit gratuitous as an
aside. Sure it's aside, but it's not exactly the semantic meaning
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Many government documents have the concept of aside as appearing
through the document and contextually near to the information to which
the aside relates. The entire sidebar seems a bit gratuitous as an
aside. Sure it's aside, but it's not
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Many government documents have the concept of aside as appearing
through the document and contextually near to the information to which
the aside relates. The entire sidebar seems a bit gratuitous as an
aside. Sure it's aside, but it's not
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Many government documents have the concept of aside as appearing
through the document and contextually near to the information to which
the aside relates. The entire sidebar seems a bit gratuitous as an
aside. Sure it's
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Many government documents have the concept of aside as appearing
through the document and contextually near to the information to which
the aside relates. The entire sidebar seems a bit gratuitous
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Many government documents have the concept of aside as appearing
through the document and contextually near to the information to which
the aside relates. The entire sidebar seems a bit gratuitous
Robert Cummings wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Many government documents have the concept of aside as appearing
through the document and contextually near to the information to which
the aside relates. The entire sidebar
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Many government documents have the concept of aside as appearing
through the document and contextually near to the information to which
the aside
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Robert Cummings rob...@interjinn.com wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
The most common misconception of how this element should be used is for
the standard sidebar. - see: http://html5doctor.com/understanding-aside/
Unfortunatley I examined that side quite
Robert Cummings wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
It took very little work since I was essentially doing that already.
aside is the most logical html 5 layout tag for describing the
sidebar
in a two
Andrew Ballard wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Robert Cummings rob...@interjinn.com wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
The most common misconception of how this element should be used is for
the standard sidebar. - see: http://html5doctor.com/understanding-aside/
Unfortunatley I examined
tedd wrote:
At 1:38 PM -0500 2/10/10, Robert Cummings wrote:
Agreed. Those make sense to demarcate the structure layout of the
document... but still, for styling the class makes more sense since it
keeps the specificity low and easy to override (especially true for
skinnable apps). In my
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:39:03 +0100, joc...@iamjochem.com (Jochem Maas) wrote:
Op 2/4/10 1:32 AM, clanc...@cybec.com.au schreef:
Recently I have frequently found, especially in the morning (GMT 2200 -
0200), that I can
open a bookmark in the manual, for example
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:26 PM, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:39:03 +0100, joc...@iamjochem.com (Jochem Maas) wrote:
as for using IE6 ... WTF ... you do realise this is essentially a web
developers mailing list right?
The interesting things in my websites go on
James McLean wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:26 PM, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:39:03 +0100, joc...@iamjochem.com (Jochem Maas) wrote:
as for using IE6 ... WTF ... you do realise this is essentially a web
developers mailing list right?
The interesting things in my
Recently I have frequently found, especially in the morning (GMT 2200 - 0200),
that I can
open a bookmark in the manual, for example
http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.image.php.
But if I then do a search of any type I get 'The page cannot be displayed'. I
then cannot
reach any page, including
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 11:32 +1100, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
Recently I have frequently found, especially in the morning (GMT 2200 -
0200), that I can
open a bookmark in the manual, for example
http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.image.php.
But if I then do a search of any type I get 'The
Op 2/4/10 1:32 AM, clanc...@cybec.com.au schreef:
Recently I have frequently found, especially in the morning (GMT 2200 -
0200), that I can
open a bookmark in the manual, for example
http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.image.php.
But if I then do a search of any type I get 'The page cannot be
Hi all. I realize this question has been asked before and I've found responses
in the archive, but none of the links work now, or the files they point to are
old or unsuitable.
I'd like to print the most recent PHP manual to paper, so I need it in a format
that's suitable. I've downloaded it
2009/7/7 Angus Mann angusm...@pobox.com:
Hi all. I realize this question has been asked before and I've found
responses in the archive, but none of the links work now, or the files they
point to are old or unsuitable.
I'd like to print the most recent PHP manual to paper, so I need it in a
Richard Quadling wrote:
$ pecl install haru
[...]
$ phd -f pdf -t phppdf -d .manual.xml
I installed haru, yet when I try the phd command, I get a class
'HaruDoc' not found error :( Has this happened to anyone else?
James
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe,
ÃmìtVërmå wrote:
snip
Please turn off your mail client's request for read receipts when
sending to a mailing list.
--
John C. Nichel IV
Programmer/System Admin (ÜberGeek)
Dot Com Holdings of Buffalo
716.856.9675
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To
Hi ALL
I am looking out for PHP Manual in PDF Format
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Kaushal
Try Google:
http://iwing.cpe.ku.ac.th/tutorial/PHP/PHPmanual.pdf
I'm sure there are others.
tedd
--
Good.. you went straight into their vault to those PDF :)
tedd wrote:
Hi ALL
I am looking out for PHP Manual in PDF Format
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Kaushal
Try Google:
http://iwing.cpe.ku.ac.th/tutorial/PHP/PHPmanual.pdf
I'm sure there are others.
tedd
--
PHP General Mailing
Hi ALL
I am looking out for PHP Manual in PDF Format
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Kaushal
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Does anyone still have the tarfile for the manual. On the website they
announce that these manuals will be redeployed shortly but this message
is already three weeks there and I need this (as always ) urgently.
Thanx in advance for sending it .
Wim
--
PHP General Mailing List
wim wrote:
Does anyone still have the tarfile for the manual. On the website they
announce that these manuals will be redeployed shortly but this message
is already three weeks there and I need this (as always ) urgently.
Thanx in advance for sending it .
Wim
Best I have is a copy that was
Does anyone still have the tarfile for the manual. On the website they
announce that these manuals will be redeployed shortly but this message
is already three weeks there and I need this (as always ) urgently.
Thanx in advance for sending it .
Best I have is a copy that was last
Wasn't the php manual with user comments available for download at one
time? Is it still there and I'm just not seeing it? If it was never
there, can I suggest that as an option for the manual download from you
good people at PHP? Damn, I'm just full of questions.
--
PHP General Mailing
I would say the dynamic nature of this guide requires it to be online, unless
you want to make some sort of update feature. Otherwise you would only be
downloading a snapshot. And then comes into play creating and maintaing all
the various snapshots of this ever changing document. IMHO, I
Hello,
John Nichel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wasn't the php manual with user comments available for download
at one time? Is it still there and I'm just not seeing it? If
it was never there, can I suggest that as an option for the
manual download from you good people at PHP? Damn, I'm
Hello,
I was just wondering if the entire PHP manual at php.net was published into a book or
not. I was going to print it out once but it turned out to be about 1000+ pages...
Thanks,
Stephen Craton
http://www.melchior.us
http://php.melchior.us
On Sunday 27 October 2002 02:45, Stephen wrote:
Hello,
I was just wondering if the entire PHP manual at php.net was published into
a book or not. I was going to print it out once but it turned out to be
about 1000+ pages...
It would be out of date as soon as it's published and before it even
Where can I download the php manual with the user notes (in html format)
Thank You
___
http://www.SaudiABM.com
___
About Islam :
http://home2.swipnet.se/~w-20479/Audio.htm
http://sultan.org
___
--
PHP General Mailing List
Dear friends,
Any one of you know when PHP Manual in PDF Format will be available?
Thanks
Pere
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL
At 03.08.2001 10:36, Pere Vineta wrote:
Dear friends,
Any one of you know when PHP Manual in PDF Format will be available?
Thanks
Probably when Adobe stops picking on innocent cryptographers pointing out
weaknesses in their software and stops hiding the source for what they forced
through as
Er, that's a MySQL manual and it doesn't have much in terms of php coding i
n it, IIRC.
GP
- Original Message -
From: Augusto Cesar Castoldi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Andreas D. Landmark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP
Probably when Adobe stops picking on innocent cryptographers pointing out
weaknesses in their software and stops hiding the source for what they
forced
through as the defacto standard for document distribution...
Last I heard, Adobe had dropped charges, and it was the US Government that
won't
You can get here:
http://monica.inf.ufsc.br/Docs/MySQL.pdf
see you.
Augusto
On Fri, 3 Aug 2001, Andreas D. Landmark wrote:
At 03.08.2001 10:36, Pere Vineta wrote:
Dear friends,
Any one of you know when PHP Manual in PDF Format will be available?
Thanks
Probably when Adobe stops
Hi,
Anyone knows if there is a XML version of the PHP manual ?
Ovidiu
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anybody know of, or have the ability to convert the PHP html manual
into an EBook for the likes of a palm pilot or Franklin reader?
This could really help for around the office and meetings.
--
Regards,
YoBro
-
DO NOT REPLY TO
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 12:50:49PM +1300, YoBro wrote:
Does anybody know of, or have the ability to convert the PHP html manual
into an EBook for the likes of a palm pilot or Franklin reader?
Try http://php.net/docs.php and look under Other Versions.
-Egon
--
http://www.linuxtag.de/
Thanks for that, and sorry.
I had looked everywhere else except there.
That should have been my first option to check out.
YoBro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
: On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 12:50:49PM +1300, YoBro wrote:
:
: Does anybody know of,
76 matches
Mail list logo
