Investing your time on Zend Framework is worth it.I do mostly php
development under Magento Platform, and Zend Framework becomes one of
the vital skills I need.Apart from that, ZF is also a well thought
Library that is a joy to work with.As one mentioned, the best part of it
it gives the option to
On 21 July 2011 23:56, Shawn McKenzie nos...@mckenzies.net wrote:
On 07/21/2011 03:59 PM, Chris Stinemetz wrote:
Hello all,
I am thinking about venturing into PHP frameworks, but I would like to
get advice on what the correct selection would be for someone that is
about intermediate in PHP
On 07/21/2011 03:59 PM, Chris Stinemetz wrote:
Hello all,
I am thinking about venturing into PHP frameworks, but I would like to
get advice on what the correct selection would be for someone that is
about intermediate in PHP knowledge.
Thank you,
So, with your post you will probably get
+1 for CI.
If you search the group archives, a little while back I asked about
micro PHP frameworks and got a ton of good replies.
So folks, how'z about a PHP framework with a built-in admin interface?
That would be pretty sweet. :)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To
On 7/21/2011 4:00 PM, Micky Hulse wrote:
+1 for CI.
If you search the group archives, a little while back I asked about
micro PHP frameworks and got a ton of good replies.
So folks, how'z about a PHP framework with a built-in admin interface?
That would be pretty sweet. :)
So, what
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Jim Lucas li...@cmsws.com wrote:
So, what would said admin interface allow you to administrate?
Your app models?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Micky Hulse rgmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Your app models?
More specifically, your app model data. :)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 07/21/2011 07:44 PM, Micky Hulse wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Micky Hulse rgmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Your app models?
More specifically, your app model data. :)
A la CakePHP. Will automagically build controllers and views for the
admin of your tables/models if you wish.
--
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Shawn McKenzie nos...@mckenzies.net wrote:
A la CakePHP. Will automagically build controllers and views for the
admin of your tables/models if you wish.
Oooh, interesting! I will check out CakePHP! Thanks for tip! :)
--
PHP General Mailing List
/
-Original Message-
From: Micah Gersten [mailto:news.php@micahscomputing.com]
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 9:52 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP Frameworks
HallMarc Websites wrote:
First time caller; long time listener..
I have been looking at various PHP
seem to be a promising
future contender.
Thanks - Marc
Measure twice and cut once.
-Original Message-
From: haliphax [mailto:halip...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:00 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP Frameworks
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 11:57 PM
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Marc Christopher Hall
m...@hallmarcwebsites.com wrote:
@todd; Micah - Precisely why I presented the question anew. Not only do I not
have enough time to troll through the archives; I was looking for a fresher
set of responses based on today's smorgasbord. Thank
m...@hallmarcwebsites.com wrote:
@todd; Micah - Precisely why I presented the question anew. Not only do I
not have enough time to troll through the archives; I was looking for a
fresher set of responses based on today's smorgasbord. Thank you for your
input; I have looked at both YII and
haliphax wrote:
Perhaps I should have phrased it a bit more concise: This has been
discussed many times--often, and RECENTLY. Anyway, since I'm already
writing this, I'll say that overhead/bloat vs. productivity of the
developer is a trade-off you're going to have to make for ANY of the
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Jason Norwood-Young
ja...@freespeechpub.co.za wrote:
haliphax wrote:
Perhaps I should have phrased it a bit more concise: This has been
discussed many times--often, and RECENTLY. Anyway, since I'm already
writing this, I'll say that overhead/bloat vs.
Jason Norwood-Young wrote:
haliphax wrote:
Perhaps I should have phrased it a bit more concise: This has been
discussed many times--often, and RECENTLY. Anyway, since I'm already
writing this, I'll say that overhead/bloat vs. productivity of the
developer is a trade-off you're going to have to
haliphax wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Jason Norwood-Young
ja...@freespeechpub.co.za wrote:
haliphax wrote:
Perhaps I should have phrased it a bit more concise: This has been
discussed many times--often, and RECENTLY. Anyway, since I'm already
writing this, I'll say that
Jason Norwood-Young wrote:
haliphax wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Jason Norwood-Young
ja...@freespeechpub.co.za wrote:
haliphax wrote:
Perhaps I should have phrased it a bit more concise: This has been
discussed many times--often, and RECENTLY. Anyway, since I'm already
writing
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com wrote:
haliphax wrote:
Framework = Overhead (when compared to vanilla PHP). Period. I'm not
by vanilla do you mean vanilla from lussimo? [http://getvanilla.com/] ?
You know damn well I didn't. :)
--
// Todd
--
PHP General
haliphax wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com wrote:
haliphax wrote:
Framework = Overhead (when compared to vanilla PHP). Period. I'm not
by vanilla do you mean vanilla from lussimo? [http://getvanilla.com/] ?
You know damn well I didn't. :)
I'd love to
HallMarc Websites wrote:
First time caller; long time listener..
I have been looking at various PHP MVC frameworks; Limb3, Symphony, Mojavi,
Navigator, WACT, etc.
I'm looking for any input anyone might have regarding which framework seems
to be the most promising?
Thanks,
-general@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP Frameworks
HallMarc Websites wrote:
First time caller; long time listener..
I have been looking at various PHP MVC frameworks; Limb3, Symphony,
Mojavi,
Navigator, WACT, etc.
I'm looking for any input anyone might have regarding which framework
Hello,
on 08/05/2006 11:47 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
This is necessary to escape wildcards characters that should be taken
literally in patterns. It is needed to implement the auto-complete
feature using SQL conditions of type field LIKE 'typed-text%'. If
typed-text contains % or
Hello,
on 08/06/2006 09:52 PM Martin Alterisio said the following:
Anyway, you may want to read this more in depth reflection of the
state
of the PHP framework world and recommendations on how to pick what
suits
best for you:
2006/8/4, Manuel Lemos [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 05:18 PM Martin Alterisio said the following:
Anyway, you may want to read this more in depth reflection of the state
of the PHP framework world and recommendations on how to pick what
suits
best for you:
Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 17:23 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 02:53 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
The main thing in Manual's post that got me writing this in the first
place was :
Imagine
Hello,
on 08/04/2006 05:47 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
The point of the post is that there is no framework in particular to
recommend. I use my own packages for my needs. They suit me well. It
does not mean they will suit everybody.
How would you know that there is no framework to
On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 15:36 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
Hello,
on 08/04/2006 05:47 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
The point of the post is that there is no framework in particular to
recommend. I use my own packages for my needs. They suit me well. It
does not mean they will suit
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 02:49 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
The point of the post is that there is no framework in particular to
recommend. I use my own packages for my needs. They suit me well. It
does not mean they will suit everybody.
How would you know that there is no framework to
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 17:15 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 02:49 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
The point of the post is that there is no framework in particular to
recommend. I use my own packages for my needs. They suit me well. It
does not mean they will suit
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 02:53 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
The main thing in Manual's post that got me writing this in the first
place was :
Imagine if there would be only one PDBC (JDBC for PHP). Instead of that
we have a never ending choice of PHP database abstraction layers that
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 02:52 PM Kilbride, James P. said the following:
I admit I have not expressed myself clearly. What I meant is
not that people should be disallowed to implement alternative
APIs, but rather that they should not feel the need to do it.
In the Java world, JDBC is the de
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 17:23 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 02:53 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
The main thing in Manual's post that got me writing this in the first
place was :
Imagine if there would be only one PDBC (JDBC for PHP). Instead of that
we have a
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 05:18 PM Martin Alterisio said the following:
Anyway, you may want to read this more in depth reflection of the state
of the PHP framework world and recommendations on how to pick what suits
best for you:
PHPClasses 0 - Botanist 1
:-)
Paul Scott wrote:
You mean we should all be happy that so much choice is available!
I agree with Rob! I am a botanist. I have never been trained in Computer
Science, as far as industry is concerned, I am not qualified to turn
on a PC. Fortunately for me, I
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 August 2006 12:37
To: Paul Scott
Cc: Robert Cummings; Manuel Lemos; php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP Frameworks - Opinion
PHPClasses 0 - Botanist 1
:-)
Paul Scott wrote:
You mean we should all be happy that so much choice is available!
I
@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP Frameworks - Opinion
PHPClasses 0 - Botanist 1
:-)
Paul Scott wrote:
You mean we should all be happy that so much choice is available!
I agree with Rob! I am a botanist. I have never been trained in Computer
Science, as far as industry
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 13:43 +0200, Arno Kuhl wrote:
I'm not so sure if the botanist wasn't saying in a rather confused way that
he was playing on the same side as PHPClasses, even if he did profess to be
in the other team. Did he say he was rolling his own (in a way only
botanists can do) or
On Wed, August 2, 2006 9:50 am, Gabe wrote:
Gabe wrote:
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out
there,
but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively
developed,
secure, etc etc.
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 02:01 AM Robert Cummings said the following:
Anyway, you may want to read this more in depth reflection of the state
of the PHP framework world and recommendations on how to pick what suits
best for you:
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 07:37 AM Jochem Maas said the following:
PHPClasses 0 - Botanist 1
:-)
Erm
Paul Scott is a good contributor of the PHPClasses site:
http://www.phpclasses.org/browse/author/145758.html
Several of his classes have been nominated to the PHP Programming
Innovation
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 09:17 AM Jochem Maas said the following:
Arno Kuhl wrote:
I'm not so sure if the botanist wasn't saying in a rather confused way that
he was playing on the same side as PHPClasses, even if he did profess to be
in the other team. Did he say he was rolling his own (in a way
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 09:25 AM Paul Scott said the following:
The main thing in Manual's post that got me writing this in the first
place was :
Imagine if there would be only one PDBC (JDBC for PHP). Instead of that
we have a never ending choice of PHP database abstraction layers that
does
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 13:32 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 02:01 AM Robert Cummings said the following:
Anyway, you may want to read this more in depth reflection of the state
of the PHP framework world and recommendations on how to pick what suits
best for you:
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 14:42 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 09:25 AM Paul Scott said the following:
The main thing in Manual's post that got me writing this in the first
place was :
Imagine if there would be only one PDBC (JDBC for PHP). Instead of that
we have a
-Original Message-
From: Manuel Lemos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 1:43 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP Frameworks - Opinion
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 09:25 AM Paul Scott said the following:
The main thing in Manual's
2006/8/3, Manuel Lemos [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
on 08/01/2006 01:35 PM Gabe said the following:
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust,
In my experience with the other frameworks (primarily Wasp, CakePHP,
Symfony, eZ Components, and Zend Framework), I've found that I was not
satisfied with the quantity of low-quality code they advocate. I have
a high standard for code quality, readability, maintainability, and
(more generally)
Matt Todd wrote:
In my experience with the other frameworks (primarily Wasp, CakePHP,
Symfony, eZ Components, and Zend Framework), I've found that I was not
satisfied with the quantity of low-quality code they advocate. I have
a high standard for code quality, readability, maintainability, and
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Jens Kleikamp wrote:
Matt Todd wrote:
Because of this, I determined to build my own framework. This was a
few months ago, and Canvas[1] was the result of my labor. I produced
this framework while working on numerous projects at the university I
work at. This allowed me to
Gabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
secure, etc etc.
Tony Marston wrote:
Gabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
karthikeyan balasubramanian wrote:
Tony Marston wrote:
Gabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out
there, but I'm not sure which one's are
Jochem Maas wrote:
Stut wrote:
Jochem Maas wrote:
I'll have it ready for you next week, what kind of license do you want?
One license to kill to go please.
006.5 your lic is in the post. and while I'm at it can I port an obscure
OS to the hardware of your choice
Jochem Maas wrote:
I'll have it ready for you next week, what kind of license do you want?
One license to kill to go please.
-Stut
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Stut wrote:
Jochem Maas wrote:
I'll have it ready for you next week, what kind of license do you want?
One license to kill to go please.
006.5 your lic is in the post. and while I'm at it can I port an obscure
OS to the hardware of your choice during my lunch break?
-Stut
--
PHP
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 15:51 +0300, karthikeyan balasubramanian wrote:
Speaking about framework. Anybody is aware there is a very popular
framework in Java called Spring which has pretty cool features like
Inversion of Control, Dependency Injection etc.
Sounds similar to the service system
Gabe wrote:
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
secure, etc etc.
Thoughts?
Sounds like it's just personal preference.
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 10:50 -0400, Gabe wrote:
Gabe wrote:
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
secure, etc etc.
Too bad there isn't a skeleton sort-of system that you essentially then
just plug in the modules that you want/need to flesh it out. Then
you'd have your own customized framework for each app that is developed
and keeps *all* of the modules relevant to that app. Nothing extra
would be
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 18:08 +0200, Jochem Maas wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 15:51 +0300, karthikeyan balasubramanian wrote:
Speaking about framework. Anybody is aware there is a very popular
framework in Java called Spring which has pretty cool features like
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 10:50 -0400, Gabe wrote:
Gabe wrote:
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 18:08 +0200, Jochem Maas wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 15:51 +0300, karthikeyan balasubramanian wrote:
Speaking about framework. Anybody is aware there is a very popular
framework in Java called Spring which has pretty cool
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 15:51 +0300, karthikeyan balasubramanian wrote:
Speaking about framework. Anybody is aware there is a very popular
framework in Java called Spring which has pretty cool features like
Inversion of Control, Dependency Injection etc.
Sounds similar
Paul Scott wrote:
Too bad there isn't a skeleton sort-of system that you essentially then
just plug in the modules that you want/need to flesh it out. Then
you'd have your own customized framework for each app that is developed
and keeps *all* of the modules relevant to that app. Nothing
I see that there are a few different Universities in Africa supporting
that framework. How active is the developer community? How long has
KINKY/Chisimba been around?
The AVOIR Project has been going for about 2 years now. KINKY and
KEWL.NextGen were the first products of that project.
I'm not going to comment on the rest of the stuff that was said, which
is why I snipped it. I'm not a purist when it comes to OO at all. But I
do have to say that while iterators in ruby are amazingly powerful that
leave me going wow.. that is so cool.. The thought of how they could be
abused and
Kilbride, James P. wrote:
I'm not going to comment on the rest of the stuff that was said, which
is why I snipped it. I'm not a purist when it comes to OO at all. But I
do have to say that while iterators in ruby are amazingly powerful that
leave me going wow.. that is so cool.. The thought of
Hello,
on 08/01/2006 01:35 PM Gabe said the following:
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
secure, etc etc.
Thoughts?
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 00:29 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
Hello,
on 08/01/2006 01:35 PM Gabe said the following:
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
but I'm not sure which one's are the
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 01:24 AM Robert Cummings said the following:
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
secure, etc etc.
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 01:47 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 01:24 AM Robert Cummings said the following:
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
but I'm not sure which one's
You mean we should all be happy that so much choice is available!
I agree with Rob! I am a botanist. I have never been trained in Computer
Science, as far as industry is concerned, I am not qualified to turn
on a PC. Fortunately for me, I am also a geek. My PHP experiences
started when
Satyam wrote:
There is no 'common consensus' but I am sure you'll be getting lots and
lots, I would even say LOTS, of sugestions.
I'm surprised no-one has mentioned the Zend Framework yet.
I'm looking to do a bit of a rewrite of a large PHP application in the
near future and would like
At 10:46 PM +0100 8/1/06, Colin Guthrie wrote:
I'm surprised no-one has mentioned the Zend Framework yet.
I'm looking to do a bit of a rewrite of a large PHP application in
the near future and would like to think Zend would be a good horse
to back, but the fact no-one here has mentioned
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 18:17 -0400, tedd wrote:
At 10:46 PM +0100 8/1/06, Colin Guthrie wrote:
I'm surprised no-one has mentioned the Zend Framework yet.
I'm looking to do a bit of a rewrite of a large PHP application in
the near future and would like to think Zend would be a good horse
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 18:17 -0400, tedd wrote:
At 10:46 PM +0100 8/1/06, Colin Guthrie wrote:
I'm surprised no-one has mentioned the Zend Framework yet.
snip.
I own Zend Professional, but don't use it (not good or bad).
snip.
An IDE is not a framework. it's
Colin Guthrie wrote:
Satyam wrote:
There is no 'common consensus' but I am sure you'll be getting lots
and lots, I would even say LOTS, of sugestions.
I'm surprised no-one has mentioned the Zend Framework yet.
I'm looking to do a bit of a rewrite of a large PHP application in the
Simon Reye wrote:
I'm moving away from Cold Fusion and am considering java or php. I've
mucked around with Struts and Coccoon on the java side and think they
are great. There does not however seem to be any well backed projects
similar to these for php.
Can anyone point me to a good php
On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 17:49 +0100, Petr Smith wrote:
Can anyone point me to a good php MVC framework?
What about http://www.symfony-project.com/ ?? Anyone using it?
There is also a relatively new application framework, out of Africa,
called KINKY. http://avoir.uwc.ac.za/projects/nextgen
80 matches
Mail list logo
