Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFSx4

2016-12-23 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വെള്ളി 23 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 04:24 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > - node-array-from https://bugs.debian.org/849178 > pkg-javascript/node-array-from.git > > - node-pad https://bugs.debian.org/849182 > pkg-javascript/node-pad.git > > - node-progress https://bugs.debian.org/849181 >

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-mute-stream 0.0.7

2016-12-23 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വെള്ളി 23 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 06:25 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Hi, > > I have updated node-mute-stream from 0.0.4 to 0.0.7. > > Version 0.0.6 is required to install node-inquirer. > > I also added build-time / autopkg tests, and the license changed from > BSD to Expat. > > There is 1 reverse

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-sorted-object_2.0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2016-12-23 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 05:47 രാവിലെ, Paolo Greppi wrote: > On 24/12/2016 00:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: >> Hi Paolo, >> >> please mention the double license of this software in your debian/copyright. >> >> Thanks! >> Thorsten > > So I have added the WTFPL-2 too, a quite popular license: >

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-cli-cursor 1.0.2

2016-12-23 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 05:06 രാവിലെ, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Hi, > > I have packaged node-cli-cursor, see the ITP I am CC-ing and > the repo: > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-cli-cursor.git > > Please someone more experienced than me review it and if it's OK sponsor > its

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-rx_4.1.0+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2016-12-23 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 06:02 രാവിലെ, Paolo Greppi wrote: > On 24/12/2016 00:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: >> Hi Paolo, >> >> Microsoft claims copyright for some files ... >> >> Thorsten > > I have attributed the copyright to Microsoft Corporation. > > Fixed without increasing the version + tag

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-command-join 1.1.1

2016-12-24 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 02:40 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Hi, > > I have packaged node-command-join, see the ITP I am CC-ing and > the repo: > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-command-join.git > > I managed to get away with the build-dep on babel ... by just copying > the file

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-object-assign-sorted 1.0.0

2016-12-24 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 02:43 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Hi, > > I have packaged node-object-assign-sorted, see the ITP I am CC-ing and > the repo: > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-object-assign-sorted.git > > This depends on node-sorted-object which is currently in the NEW

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Re: Help needed on rollup

2016-12-24 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 02:44 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > With the 3 RFS I posted today, you should have everything you need for lerna Awesome! I'm working on lerna now. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#849557: switch to node-uglify instead of yui-compressor

2016-12-28 Thread Pirate Praveen
package: jqueryui severity: wishlist version: 1.12.1+dfsg-3 yui-compressor pulls in jre. Since nodejs is already a build dep, its better to use node-uglify. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#849557: Bug#849557: switch to node-uglify instead of yui-compressor

2016-12-28 Thread Pirate Praveen
2016-12-28 21:32 या दिवशी Pirate Praveen ने लिहीले : yui-compressor pulls in jre. Since nodejs is already a build dep, its better to use node-uglify. On a closer look, yui-compressor is used only for minifying css. To replace it, we should package uglifycss. There are no dependencies

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#849275: lodash/each

2016-12-24 Thread Pirate Praveen
to make matters worse, some work as / instead of . lodash/each works but lodash.each doeas not. I think it is because some functions are removed from lodash and moved to its own package. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#849275: lodash/each

2016-12-24 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 09:10 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote: > to make matters worse, some work as / instead of . > > lodash/each works but lodash.each doeas not. I think it is because some > functions are removed from lodash and moved to its own package. > I think this got rem

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#849275: provide lodash/cloneDeep and others

2016-12-24 Thread Pirate Praveen
package: node-lodash-packages, node-lodash severity: important Control: tags -1 help Currently we have to require lodash.clonedeep (all small letters for all modules), but some packages are expecting it like lodash/cloneDeep. This can be fixed by adding a symlink /usr/lib/nodejs/lodash/cloneDeep

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#849275: Bug#849275: lodash/each

2016-12-24 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 09:20 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote: > I think this got removed completely. > Error: Cannot find module 'lodash/each' > > We'll have to embed code for lodash.each I think. After looking at lodash dist.tarball, each is just a require for forEach. lodash.forE

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Re: Help needed on rollup

2016-12-26 Thread Pirate Praveen
On തിങ്കള്‍ 26 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 07:47 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > I can reproduce this, tried to debug by spinkling console.log > statements, and got lost somewhere when it loads the rollup.config.js > > Sorry I can't help more After include src directory (my personal repo updated with new package)

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-inquirer 2.0.0

2016-12-25 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 02:43 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Hi, > > I have packaged node-inquirer, see the ITP I am CC-ing and > the repo: > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-inquirer.git > > This depends on node-rx and on node-cli-cursor which are currently in > the NEW queue. >

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-read 1.0.7

2016-12-25 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വെള്ളി 23 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 06:43 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Hi, > > I have updated node-read from 1.0.5 to 1.0.7. > > Version 1.0.7 is required for node-yarnpkg 0.18 > > I also added build-time / autopkg tests, and the license changed from > BSD to Expat. > > There is 1 reverse dependency:

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-mute-stream 0.0.7

2016-12-25 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വെള്ളി 23 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 10:35 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > On 23/12/2016 17:11, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> On വെള്ളി 23 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 06:25 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have updated node-mute-stream from 0.0.4 to 0.0.7. >>> >>&

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-invariant_2.2.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2016-12-25 Thread Pirate Praveen
On തിങ്കള്‍ 26 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 04:30 രാവിലെ, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Missing attributions from Facebook. > > -- Chris Lamb Sun, 25 Dec 2016 22:47:24 + Fixed. > > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why > your files were rejected,

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Re: Help needed on rollup

2016-12-26 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 10:52 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote: > This is now stuck at #849275, we need to fix lodash to proceed further > (babel needs this and lerna builddeps on babel). I'll try to use npm and > upload to contrib. lodash is fixed. But when I try to use the rollup built as

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] grunt-contrib-uglify and grunt-contrib-copy

2016-12-21 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ബുധന്‍ 21 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 12:49 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Node-grunt-contrib-copy is also ready but awaits for node-file-sync-cmp Uploaded both. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] grunt-contrib-uglify and grunt-contrib-copy

2016-12-21 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ബുധന്‍ 21 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 04:09 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Local Npm module "grunt-contrib-copy" not found. Is it installed? > Local Npm module "grunt-contrib-uglify" not found. Is it installed? > Local Npm module "grunt-contrib-concat" not found. Is it installed? > Warning: Task "concat:core"

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-grunt-contrib-uglify 2.0.0

2016-12-21 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ബുധന്‍ 21 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 12:45 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Hi, > > I have packaged node-grunt-contrib-uglify, see the ITP I am CC-ing and > the repo: > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-grunt-contrib-uglify.git > > I had to repackage to get rid of uglyfied files part of the

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#848912: RFS: node-file-sync-cmp/0.1.1-1 [ITP]

2016-12-21 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ബുധന്‍ 21 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 12:14 രാവിലെ, Ross Gammon wrote: > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-file-sync-cmp > /node-file-sync-cmp_0.1.1-1.dsc > I have used alioth repo to build the

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-jsonminify 0.4.1

2016-12-22 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ബുധന്‍ 21 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 05:16 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Hi, > > I have packaged node-jsonminify, see the ITP I am CC-ing and > the repo: > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-jsonminify.git > > Please someone more experienced than me review it and if it's OK sponsor > its

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: tinycon.js 0.6.5

2016-12-21 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ബുധന്‍ 21 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 03:12 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Hi, > > I have packaged tinycon.js, see the ITP I am CC-ing and > the repo: > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/tinycon.js.git > > This is a requirement of etherpad-lite (https://bugs.debian.org/576998). > > Please someone

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-loose-envify_1.3.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2016-12-22 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വ്യാഴം 22 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 11:36 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > On 22/12/2016 17:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: >> >> Hi Paolo, >> >> you wrote that you removed the bad react code, but >> test/pkg/node_modules/invariant/index.js >> test/pkg/node_modules/warning/index.js >> is still there... >> >>

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding node-gulp-sourcemaps_1.9.1-1_amd64.changes

2016-12-22 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വ്യാഴം 22 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 04:28 വൈകു, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > Hi, > > this package depends on acorn. Will that be uploaded soon? That was a typo, it should have been node-acorn. This was fixed in git already as 1.9.1-2. This is now uploaded. > Thanks! > Thorsten > > signature.asc

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Re: Help needed on rollup

2016-12-24 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 03:31 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 02:44 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> With the 3 RFS I posted today, you should have everything you need for lerna > > Awesome! I'm working on lerna now. This is now stuck at #849275, we nee

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Re: Help needed on rollup

2016-12-26 Thread Pirate Praveen
On തിങ്കള്‍ 26 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 01:48 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 10:52 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> This is now stuck at #849275, we need to fix lodash to proceed further >> (babel needs this and lerna builddeps on babel). I'll try to use npm and >&

[Pkg-javascript-devel] help with node-grunt-contrib-requirejs

2016-12-07 Thread Pirate Praveen
hi, I need grunt-contrib-requirejs to build jqueryui using grunt (current build is broken https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=847353). Fixing the current build would also be a solution. This gets stuck at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=847369 Thanks Praveen

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] help with node-grunt-contrib-requirejs

2016-12-07 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2016, ഡിസംബർ 8 12:38:21 AM IST, Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> wrote: >Hi Pirate, > >On 07-12-16 17:16, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> I need grunt-contrib-requirejs to build jqueryui using grunt (current >> build is broken > >What do you mean by that? The current

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#847353: Bug#847353: Bug#847353: Bug#846961: recent update of libjs-jquery-ui broke gitlab

2016-12-07 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2016, ഡിസംബർ 7 8:25:13 PM IST, Paolo Greppi wrote: >I wonder if this is relevant ? > >https://github.com/gruntjs/grunt-contrib-clean/issues/90 I found that already and fixed it (updated on the upstream ticket already). Now we need to package a few more

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-has-binary 0.1.7

2016-12-16 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വെള്ളി 16 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 02:04 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Please someone more experienced than me review it and if it's OK sponsor > its upload. Uploaded, thanks! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#858856: Bug#858856: node-handlebars: Does not load

2017-03-28 Thread Pirate Praveen
Control: severity -1 important On Tuesday 28 March 2017 12:58 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > I've set Severity grave since the module can not be used > at all if it does not load. The current use of this package is to provide source code for ruby-handlebars-assets. Since babel is not packaged yet,

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] libjs-handlebars: How to get /usr/lib/nodejs/handlebars/dist/cjs/handlebars.js?

2017-03-28 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Tuesday 28 March 2017 12:32 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > As far as I can see finalising babel is the first step, right? Do you > need any help a JavaScript illiteral Debian packager could provide? You can try and troubleshoot the errors in current babel packages. I have uploaded them in

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] libjs-handlebars: How to get /usr/lib/nodejs/handlebars/dist/cjs/handlebars.js?

2017-03-28 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Monday 27 March 2017 10:07 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote: > That's simply a bug in node-handlebars: > ~$ node >> require('handlebars') > Error: Cannot find module '../dist/cjs/handlebars' > at Function.Module._resolveFilename (module.js:325:15) > at Function.Module._load (module.js:276:25) >

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] rfs : node-constants-browserify

2017-03-31 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Saturday 04 February 2017 10:37 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On ശനി 04 ഫെബ്രുവരി 2017 05:37 വൈകു, Akash Sarda wrote: >> I have ran sbuild, it is lintian clean. >> I have packaged it, >> This is the link to my repo. >> >> https://git.fosscommunity.in/AkashSarda/no

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#857991: Bug#857991: npm2deb: Please Recommend npm instead of Depend

2017-03-19 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വെള്ളി 17 മാര്‍ച്ച് 2017 11:01 വൈകു, Jérémy Lal wrote: > I perfectly understand the idea of keeping it - i don't intend to > remove it from unstable, but from testing. > Since npm2deb users are largely us, debian developers, and we are > supposed to develop new packages in a testing

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#857991: npm2deb: Please Recommend npm instead of Depend

2017-03-17 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2017, മാർച്ച് 17 5:02:25 AM IST, "Jérémy Lal" wrote: >I intend to ask removal of npm from testing. > :( It is currently used to bootstrap circular dependencies too. Would it be possible to keep it? -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-date-now_1.0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-04-12 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Thursday 06 April 2017 12:30 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > Hi Bastien, > > in case colingo and raynos are not the same person, than colingo should > be also mentioned in your debian/copyright. Fixed and uploaded. > Thanks! > Thorsten > > > > === > > Please feel free to respond to

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Contributing to Debian-JS

2017-04-06 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Wednesday 05 April 2017 07:52 AM, Keerthana Krishnan wrote: > Hi guys! > > I'm Keerthana K, a web developer from Cochin, India. Hi Keerthana, Around 6 months back we had organized a packaging workshop at Infopark https://www.loomio.org/d/yCWzn89k/python-packaging-at-kochi-python-follow-up

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#856830: Bug#856830: Could not reproduce with pbuilder

2017-03-14 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ചൊവ്വ 14 മാര്‍ച്ച് 2017 06:24 വൈകു, Shanavas wrote: > Successfully built using pbuilder. Successfully built with sbuild too. autopkgtest also passed. Chris, can you check if you can still reproduce the failure? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#870460: Bug#870460: npm package woefully out of date in Sid

2017-08-02 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ബുധന്‍ 02 ആഗസ്റ്റ് 2017 01:27 വൈകു, Russel Winder wrote: > The npm version is Debian Sid is 1.4.21 whereas the latest version released > by npm is 5.3.0. The nodejs > version is 6.11 which is up to date, but the nodejs documentation states it > include npm 3.10.10. Thus the > Debian npm set

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-regenerator-transform_0.9.8-1_amd64.changes is NEW

2017-08-12 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ശനി 12 ആഗസ്റ്റ് 2017 12:04 വൈകു, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > binary:node-regenerator-transform is NEW. > binary:node-regenerator-transform is NEW. > source:node-regenerator-transform is NEW. > > Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action > from the ftpteam to

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding node-regenerator-transform_0.9.8-1_amd64.changes

2017-08-12 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ശനി 12 ആഗസ്റ്റ് 2017 10:45 വൈകു, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > Hi, > > there seems to be another dependency missing: node-babel-types (>=6.19.0) > > Thorsten > > node-babel-types is a binary package provided by node-babel which is also in NEW. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#867295: npm2deb: please automatically exclude certain files from debian/install

2017-07-16 Thread Pirate Praveen
Control: severity -1 grave On Wed, 05 Jul 2017 17:12:32 +0200 Johannes Schauer wrote: > Currently, npm2deb puts lots of files into debian/install including > files which definitely do not belong into /usr/lib/nodejs/*/ like: > > Hidden files like .travis.yml, .gitattribute,

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-dashdash_1.14.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-07-12 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 07/12/2017 08:30 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > Hi, > > please mention node-dashdash-1.14.1/tools/jsstyle in your debian/copyright. Can you clarify, what is missing? I can see it in my local copy. Did I miss this in upload? Files: tools/jsstyle Copyright: 2008 Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] #865892: node-proper-lockfile FTBFS

2017-07-19 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ബുധന്‍ 19 ജൂലൈ 2017 07:52 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > I have pushed the fix to the git repo on alioth. My DM process [4] is still > ongoing so please someone upload node-proper-lockfile 2.0.1-1 for me. Uploaded, thanks. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-querystring-es3_0.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-07-21 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വെള്ളി 21 ജൂലൈ 2017 12:30 രാവിലെ, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > Hi, > > in this package please mention: > package/encode.js:// Copyright Joyent, Inc. > package/decode.js:// Copyright Joyent, Inc. > in your debian/copyright. > > Thanks! > Thorsten > > Fixed and reuploaded signature.asc

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-crypto-browserify_3.11.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-07-21 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വെള്ളി 21 ജൂലൈ 2017 12:30 രാവിലെ, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > Hi, > > please mention > crypto-browserify-3.11.0/example/bundle.js > in your debian/copyright. > > Thanks! > Thorsten > Fixed and reuploaded. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-path-browserify_0.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-07-21 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വെള്ളി 21 ജൂലൈ 2017 12:30 രാവിലെ, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > Hi, > > please mention > path-browserify-0.0.0/index.js:// Copyright Joyent, Inc. > in your debian/copyright. > > Thanks! > Thorsten > > Fixed and reuploaded signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#869530: node-magic-string autopkgtest is broken in 0.22.3-1

2017-07-23 Thread Pirate Praveen
Control: block -1 by 864209 On തിങ്കള്‍ 24 ജൂലൈ 2017 05:00 രാവിലെ, Steve Langasek wrote: > Source: node-magic-string > Version: 0.21.3-1 > Severity: serious > > As seen at > , the > node-magic-string package is broken in

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#868298: Get out of Debian for better alternatives?

2017-07-23 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 12:21:36 +0200 Julien Puydt wrote:> the upstream homepage says to avoid using it, so perhaps it should get > out of Debian and the other packages depending on it should be ported to > something actually working? Description says it is provided for

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-libs-browser_2.0.0-1_amd64.changes is NEW

2017-07-27 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വ്യാഴം 22 ജൂണ്‍ 2017 10:20 രാവിലെ, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > binary:node-libs-browser is NEW. > binary:node-libs-browser is NEW. > source:node-libs-browser is NEW. > > Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action > from the ftpteam to process. The upload was

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-babylon_6.14.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-07-21 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വെള്ളി 21 ജൂലൈ 2017 12:30 രാവിലെ, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > Hi, > > here at least: > babylon-6.14.1/test/fixtures/esprima/LICENSE > should appear in your debian/copyright. > > Thanks! > Thorsten > Fixed and reuploaded signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding node-gauge_2.7.4-1_amd64.changes

2017-07-06 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 07/06/2017 02:14 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On 07/06/2017 01:56 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: >> Hi, >> >> some dependencies of you package are still missing, shall I reject the >> package? >> >> Thanks! >> Thorsten >> >> >>

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding node-gauge_2.7.4-1_amd64.changes

2017-07-06 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 07/06/2017 01:56 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > Hi, > > some dependencies of you package are still missing, shall I reject the > package? > > Thanks! > Thorsten > > > node-has-unicode and node-aproba were in experimental. I have reuploaded both to unstable. signature.asc Description:

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-assert-plus_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-04-29 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ശനി 29 ഏപ്രില്‍ 2017 02:30 വൈകു, Chris Lamb wrote: > Missing attributions for Joylent.reuplo Fixed and reuploaded. > > -- Chris Lamb Sat, 29 Apr 2017 08:12:00 + > > > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why > your files were

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-json-schema_0.2.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-04-28 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വെള്ളി 13 ജനുവരി 2017 09:49 രാവിലെ, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On വ്യാഴം 12 ജനുവരി 2017 01:30 രാവിലെ, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: >> >> maintainer address bounces ... > > Its a typo, copying the correct address (from ITP). > > Aman, please fix your email address. You may

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-acorn-dynamic-import_2.0.2-2_amd64.changes is NEW

2017-08-19 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വെള്ളി 23 ജൂണ്‍ 2017 02:54 വൈകു, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > binary:node-acorn-dynamic-import is NEW. > binary:node-acorn-dynamic-import is NEW. > source:node-acorn-dynamic-import is NEW. > node-acorn-dynamic-import_2.0.2.orig.tar.gz is only available in NEW. >

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-webpack_2.6.1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental, experimental

2017-08-23 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ചൊവ്വ 22 ആഗസ്റ്റ് 2017 08:30 വൈകു, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > > > Accepted: I uploaded it to experimental because some tests were failing. Can someone check the failing tests? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#868319: Please package newer upstreams

2017-08-18 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 15:31:20 +0200 Julien Puydt wrote: > upstream is now up to 4.1.0, and there are failing tests in the current > Debian version which get in the way of updating nodejs -- can we get a > newer version, please? yes, but tied up with other updates

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#862655: update node-readdirp to latest upstream release

2017-05-15 Thread Pirate Praveen
package: node-readdirp version: 0.2.4-2 node-chokidar wants a newer version on node-readdirp But the following tests fail $ tap test/readdirp.js test/readdirp.js 18/24 # Subtest: not ok test unfinished: reading root using glob filter at: line:

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#862886: allow running gulp without installing a local gulp

2017-05-17 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: gulp version: 3.9.1-2 Severity: important Control: block 862880 by -1 grunt works this way, but gulp insist on a local gulp. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#862886: rationale for this

2017-05-17 Thread Pirate Praveen
This has some discussions on why its like this http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22115400/why-do-we-need-to-install-gulp-globally-and-locally#22115441 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#862888: this is a gulp issue

2017-05-18 Thread Pirate Praveen
Control: reassign -1 gulp at Liftoff.handleArguments (/usr/lib/nodejs/gulp/bin/gulp.js:99:14) if (semver.gt(cliPackage.version, env.modulePackage.version)) { signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#862887: 14 tests fail gulp: output stream dest() should return a output stream that writes files:, Uncaught TypeError: Expected a string, got object

2017-05-17 Thread Pirate Praveen
package: gulp severity: important version: 3.9.3-2 pravi@nishumbha:~/forge/debian/git/pkg-javascript/node-gulp$ mocha -R spec gulp output stream dest() ✓ should return a stream 1) should return a output stream that writes files ✓ should return a output stream that does

[Pkg-javascript-devel] setimmediate and set-immediate-shim

2017-05-16 Thread Pirate Praveen
Hi, readdirp 2.1.0 uses set-immediate-shim. We already have setimmediate, so I tried patching readdirp to use setimmediate, but chokidar tests fail with incompatible type when using setimmediate. I see two solutions 1. Package set-immediate-shim 2. See if only tests are the problem, then fix

[Pkg-javascript-devel] planning to upload node-request 2.81.0 to experimental

2017-05-12 Thread Pirate Praveen
Hi, As part of packaging webpack, I have been working on updating node-request, most of its missing dependencies are now packaged. It has these reverse dependencies: npm node-ytdl-core node-gyp node-pre-gyp node-millstone node-jsdom Hoping to get help updating them/make sure they

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] grunt and Debian packaged grunt modules

2017-05-13 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2017, മേയ് 13 8:41:40 PM IST, Paul Gevers wrote: >Hi, > >I try to package something (libjs-jquery-tablesorter) that builds with >grunt. Initially, I was missing required dependencies, but after >installing those that I could find in Debian, the error list remains >the

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-dashdash_1.14.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-05-13 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ശനി 13 മെയ് 2017 12:30 രാവിലെ, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > Hi, > > please mention > node-dashdash-1.14.1/tools/jsstyle is missing > in your debian/copyright. Fixed and uploaded again. > Thanks! > Thorsten > > > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why >

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] grunt and Debian packaged grunt modules

2017-05-14 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ഞായര്‍ 14 മെയ് 2017 11:57 രാവിലെ, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Pirate, > > On 14-05-17 04:14, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> You need to patch the Gruntfile.js with path, see fuzzaldrin-plus for >> an example. There is a wishlist bug to make it easier. > > Great. That he

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#862655: update node-readdirp to latest upstream release

2017-05-16 Thread Pirate Praveen
Control: retitle -1 some tests are failing On Mon, 15 May 2017 15:45:05 +0530 Pirate Praveen <prav...@onenetbeyond.org> wrote: > package: node-readdirp > version: 0.2.4-2 > > node-chokidar wants a newer version on node-readdirp Since all tests of node-chokidar are passing wit

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-dashdash_1.14.1-1_amd64.changes is NEW

2017-05-10 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ചൊവ്വ 02 മെയ് 2017 10:48 വൈകു, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > binary:node-dashdash is NEW. > binary:node-dashdash is NEW. > source:node-dashdash is NEW. > > Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action > from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-watchpack_1.3.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-06-08 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ബുധന്‍ 07 ജൂണ്‍ 2017 10:30 വൈകു, Chris Lamb wrote: > > LICENSE file contians "Copyright JS Foundation and other contributors" which > differs from d/copyright entirely... > Fixed and uploaded. > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why > your files

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#863934: fix

2017-06-19 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 07:57:23 +0200 Paolo Greppi wrote: > According to upstream (https://github.com/felixge/node-dateformat/issues/21) > "dateformat() doesn't really play well with timezones since the javascript > Date() object itself doesn't really play well with

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#863934: fix

2017-06-20 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2017, ജൂൺ 20 12:11:57 PM IST, "Jérémy Lal" wrote: >I'm pretty sure it does. > >Jérémy TZ=GMT did not work, but TZ=UTC worked. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#862918: Bug#862918: New version available upstream: 4.0.2

2017-05-20 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വ്യാഴം 18 മെയ് 2017 11:34 വൈകു, Jeffrey Cliff wrote: > Package: libjs-bignumber > Severity: normal > Version: 1.3.0+dfsg-1 > > Looks like this package hasn't been updated to upstream in quite awihle > - 3 major versions have been released since ~2013 where 1.3.1 seems to > date from. > Most

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#863255: Please rename/provide libjs-jquery-atwho

2017-05-24 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2017, മേയ് 25 5:23:30 AM IST, Ben Finney wrote: >This library seems only useful in an interactive browser session. It >seems quite misleading to declare that it provides a library for >non-interactive Node. > >What would justify that declaration? Its browser component is

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#857986: Bug#857986: npm: This pakcage is 3 years old? (consider removal)

2017-05-22 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വെള്ളി 19 മെയ് 2017 03:45 വൈകു, Jérémy Lal wrote: > There are complications to distributing npm: it depends on a LOT of > modules, which > means it requires a lot of debian-maintainer time to package, and update. https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/Tasks/npm ie, roughly about 78 new

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#857986: Bug#857986: npm: This pakcage is 3 years old? (consider removal)

2017-05-22 Thread Pirate Praveen
On തിങ്കള്‍ 22 മെയ് 2017 06:41 വൈകു, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > ...for the _initial_ packaging work. > > We are package *maintainers*. If you have not realized, we are discussing about maintaining an existing package. I think you have also not realized the meaning of team maintained packages. The

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#861818: update node-errno to lastest upstream release

2017-05-04 Thread Pirate Praveen
package: node-errno version: 0.1.1-1 severity: wishlist Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/rvagg/node-errno/issues/20 Control: block 805911 by -1 Needs newer errno for memory-fs signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-ecc-jsbn_0.1.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-05-08 Thread Pirate Praveen
On തിങ്കള്‍ 08 മെയ് 2017 02:16 രാവിലെ, Chris Lamb wrote: > Pirate Praveen wrote: > >> On തിങ്കള്‍ 08 മെയ് 2017 12:30 രാവിലെ, Chris Lamb wrote: >>> lib/LICENSE-jsbn seems to refer to other stuff. please clarify in >>> debian/copyright > [..] >> What

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-ecc-jsbn_0.1.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-05-07 Thread Pirate Praveen
On തിങ്കള്‍ 08 മെയ് 2017 12:30 രാവിലെ, Chris Lamb wrote: > lib/LICENSE-jsbn seems to refer to other stuff. please clarify in > debian/copyright node-jsbn already has the correct copyright notice. This library is only linking to jsbn and not embedding it. What clarification should be added to

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-bcrypt-pbkdf_1.0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-05-07 Thread Pirate Praveen
On തിങ്കള്‍ 08 മെയ് 2017 12:30 രാവിലെ, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Missing references for embedded bcrypt lib. (And possibly more) > > -- Chris Lamb Sun, 07 May 2017 18:11:32 + > Fixed and uploaded again. > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-source-list-map_1.1.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-05-05 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വെള്ളി 05 മെയ് 2017 04:30 വൈകു, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Missing attribution for (at least) lib/base64-vlq.js, alas :) > > -- Chris Lamb Fri, 05 May 2017 10:48:48 + > Fixed and uploaded again. > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Packaging nodejs-7.9

2017-05-04 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2017, മേയ് 4 7:51:41 PM IST, "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" wrote: >Hi folks, > > >I'm currently packaging nodejs-7.9 for various deb Distros. > >I'll have to maintain some applications that use the fanciest >new features, and precompiled binaries from untrusted

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin_0.4.6-1_amd64.changes is NEW

2017-09-14 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വ്യാഴം 14 സെപ്റ്റംബര്‍ 2017 06:20 വൈകു, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > binary:node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin is NEW. > binary:node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin is NEW. > source:node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin is NEW. > > Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action > from the

[Pkg-javascript-devel] help with building node-jquery

2017-09-14 Thread Pirate Praveen
Hi, I'm trying to build node-jquery as it is a dependency of gitlab. Usually I patch loadTasks in Gruntfile.js to load global tasks (see node-fuzzaldrin), but I can't see any loadTasks option here. I tried to skip grunt and run babel directly babel src -d lib but got this error SyntaxError:

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-ansi-regex_3.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-09-19 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ചൊവ്വ 19 സെപ്റ്റംബര്‍ 2017 03:42 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Hi I'd like to update node-string-width and node-wrap-ansi which I maintain. > > In the process of doing that I noticed that node-ansi-regex and > node-strip-ansi are also lagging behind. > > I have updated them as well. > > So I

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-es5-ext_0.10.30-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-09-20 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ബുധന്‍ 20 സെപ്റ്റംബര്‍ 2017 11:30 വൈകു, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > Hi, > > please mention: > es5-ext-0.10.30/string/#/normalize/shim.js > in your debian/copyright. Fixed and reuploaded > Thanks! > Thorsten > > > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-is-module_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-09-21 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 09/20/2017 11:30 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > Hi Julien, > > the copyright owner in debian/copyright and README.md do not match. > Can you please clarify? > Fixed and re-uploaded. > Thanks! > Thorsten > > > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#878006: updating nodejs breaks node-constants-browserify

2017-10-08 Thread Pirate Praveen
package: node-constants-browserify version: 1.0.0+dfsg-4 severity: important dpkg: cycle found while processing triggers: chain of packages whose triggers are or may be responsible: node-constants-browserify -> node-constants-browserify packages' pending triggers which are or may be

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-gulp-newer_1.3.0-1_amd64.changes is NEW

2017-10-08 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ചൊവ്വ 26 സെപ്റ്റംബര്‍ 2017 02:35 വൈകു, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > binary:node-gulp-newer is NEW. > binary:node-gulp-newer is NEW. > source:node-gulp-newer is NEW. > > Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action > from the ftpteam to process. The upload was

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#877967: autopkgtest fails with node-supports-color 4.4.0 in experimental

2017-10-08 Thread Pirate Praveen
Control: retitle -1 4 autopkgtests fail On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 12:09:47 +0530 Pirate Praveen <prav...@debian.org> wrote:> webpack 3.5.6 require node-supports-color >= 4.2 seems the failure is unrelated to node-supports-color https://ci.debian.net/data/packages/unstable/amd64/n/nod

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-babel_6.25.0+dfsg-13_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-10-08 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ഞായര്‍ 08 ഒക്ടോബര്‍ 2017 08:54 വൈകു, Chris Lamb wrote: > > > Hi Pirate Praveen, > > Where it is used is not material here unless I am missing something > fundamental. I meant, these are not generated by me, its provided as fixtures, that is used during test. I'

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-babel-preset-env_1.6.0-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-10-08 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ഞായര്‍ 08 ഒക്ടോബര്‍ 2017 08:30 വൈകു, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Hi > > 2017 Henry Zhu > > in debian/copyright (line 7) disagrees with LICENSE line 3. Fixed > > -- Chris Lamb Sun, 08 Oct 2017 13:19:42 + > > > > === > > Please feel free to

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-babel_6.25.0+dfsg-13_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-10-08 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ഞായര്‍ 08 ഒക്ടോബര്‍ 2017 08:30 വൈകു, Chris Lamb wrote: > > > 11 Files: packages/babel-preset-es2015/test/fixtures/traceur/* > 12 Copyright: [] [name of copyright owner] > 13 License: Apache-2.0 > 14 Comment: name of copyright holder is missing > > Really? No it's not. This is a meta

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#877212: node-d3-color: B-D npm not available in testing

2017-10-04 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ചൊവ്വ 03 ഒക്ടോബര്‍ 2017 11:04 വൈകു, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > I *do* take note, however, of: > > Examples of packages which would be included in contrib are: > > • free packages which require contrib, non-free packages or packages > which are not in our archive at all for compilation

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >