Hi,
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:25:50 +0700
Maia Kozheva wrote:
> If it has gone dormant and its members are no longer interested in
> maintaining the packages, I believe gtkpod and libgpod fall under the
> scope of the Debian Multimedia team. And as I already de facto maintain
> gtkpod in Ubuntu,
On Friday 13 August 2010 15:15:26 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:20:45PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> >Aah, finally a new round of cdbs vs. dh bashing, we didn't have enough
> >of that at debconf 10 ;-)
>
> The best way to keep a thread alive(!) is to feed it new argument
Package: jaaa
Version: 0.6.0-1+b1
Severity: normal
I have jaaa within the Applications -> Sound submenu. However, the only effect
of clicking on it is the following message in .xsession-errors:
Jaaa-0.6.0
(C) 2004-2010 Fons Adriaensen
Options:
-h Display this text
-nam
It's unfortunate that bugs.debian.org don't automatically forward all bug report
comments to the submitter... I never got the message dated "Sat, 29 May 2010"
However, jaaa it doesn't seem to have the problem now at least. On the other
hand, now I have problems with japa. So I'm starting to won
On 13/08/10 15:15, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Backporting a recent debhelper requires backporting dpkg which I
> wouldn't dare do...
While I don't want to get in the dh/cdbs debate (I'm fine with either),
this statement is not true. debhelper requires dpkg-dev >= 1.14.19, and
stable has 1.14.29.
-
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:06:45PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 13/08/10 13:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:01:43PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 13/08/10 08:01, Andreas Tille wrote:
BTW, I have another issue: This mailing list recieves a lot of
packaging related in
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:20:45PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Aah, finally a new round of cdbs vs. dh bashing, we didn't have enough
of that at debconf 10 ;-)
The best way to keep a thread alive(!) is to feed it new arguments, as
you do below.
I honestly tried to not do side-by-side co
On 13/08/10 14:12, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> Now that there is a separate thread on cdbs vs dh, perhaps someone could
> give me some feedback on my pd-motex package which happens to use dh.
> I'm ready to fix whatever needs fixing.
THe changelog mentions that it is a non-maintainer upload
Now that there is a separate thread on cdbs vs dh, perhaps someone could
give me some feedback on my pd-motex package which happens to use dh.
I'm ready to fix whatever needs fixing.
.hc
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 17:20 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Aah, finally a new round of cdbs vs. dh bashing,
On 13/08/10 13:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:01:43PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On 13/08/10 08:01, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> BTW, I have another issue: This mailing list recieves a lot of
>>> packaging related information which I#m not really interested in.
>>> Howeve
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:01:43PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 13/08/10 08:01, Andreas Tille wrote:
BTW, I have another issue: This mailing list recieves a lot of
packaging related information which I#m not really interested in.
However, de just have this mailinglist debian-multime...@l.d.o
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 17:46:18 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On 13/08/10 10:57, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:49:01 (CEST), Andreas Tille wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> after subscribing this list I now get several e-mails about packages I
>>> just don't know which are obvi
FYI: The status of the fluidsynth-dssi source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.9.1-3
Current version: 1.0.0-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
FYI: The status of the lv2-c++-tools source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.0.3-2
Current version: 1.0.3-3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will r
FYI: The status of the composite source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.006-3
Current version: 0.006-4
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will recei
On 13/08/10 08:01, Andreas Tille wrote:
> BTW, I have another issue: This mailing list recieves a lot of
> packaging related information which I#m not really interested in.
> However, de just have this mailinglist debian-multime...@l.d.o. Do you
> see a chance that we move discussion like this ab
On 13/08/10 09:10, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> What obviously helps is documentation. I never used documentation
> myself for CDBS, just looked at the snippets, and I agree they may look
> scary to someone not intimate in make (similar to autotools being
> disliked by many).
Is there a doxygen-like
Aah, finally a new round of cdbs vs. dh bashing, we didn't have enough
of that at debconf 10 ;-)
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:40:08 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:43:51PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
>>Am Donnerstag, den 12.08.2010, 23:38 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaar
On 13/08/10 10:57, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:49:01 (CEST), Andreas Tille wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> after subscribing this list I now get several e-mails about packages I
>> just don't know which are obviosely relevent for multimedia issues but I
>> just do not feel competent
On 13/08/10 04:13, IOhannes zmölnig wrote:
>> > Why do you install zexy into a non standard pd path?
>> >
> i don't.
> i install the zexy library (binaries and abstractions) into
> /usr/lib/pd/extra/zexy/ which is quite the standard way to do it.
> Pd will look for binaries as /usr/lib/pd/extra/.pd
Accepted:
bristol-data_0.60.6-1_all.deb
to main/b/bristol/bristol-data_0.60.6-1_all.deb
bristol_0.60.6-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/b/bristol/bristol_0.60.6-1.debian.tar.gz
bristol_0.60.6-1.dsc
to main/b/bristol/bristol_0.60.6-1.dsc
bristol_0.60.6-1_amd64.deb
to main/b/bristol/bristol_0.60.6-
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:49:01 (CEST), Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after subscribing this list I now get several e-mails about packages I
> just don't know which are obviosely relevent for multimedia issues but I
> just do not feel competent to put into the right task. Apt-cache told
> me th
Hey,
|--==> On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 14:01:43 +0200, Andreas Tille
said:
AT> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:59:57PM +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
>>nice to see you keep pushing Debian Blends :)
AT> Free, nice to hear from you again! \o/
Same here! :)
>>Yes, the DeMuDi idea is quite old and eve
bristol_0.60.6-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
bristol_0.60.6-1.dsc
bristol_0.60.6.orig.tar.gz
bristol_0.60.6-1.debian.tar.gz
bristol_0.60.6-1_amd64.deb
bristol-data_0.60.6-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host fr
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 03:10:19PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 01:58:18PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Freitag, den 13.08.2010, 10:40 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
CDBS provides routines to track copyright and licensing info of
sources.
Here's a quick intro
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 501965 https://bugs.launchpad.net/jokosher/+bug/386979
Bug #501965 [jokosher] jokosher: the program closes when it's playing an audio
file and click on a button to add instrument.
Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://bugs.launc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 543180 0.6.0-1
Bug #543180 [jaaa] jaaa: segfaults if DISPLAY is unset
Bug Marked as found in versions jaaa/0.6.0-1.
> forwarded 543180 f...@kokkinizita.net
Bug #543180 [jaaa] jaaa: segfaults if DISPLAY is unset
Set Bug forwarded-to-address t
Your message dated Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:48:20 +0200
with message-id
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #565622,
regarding jaaa: Errors using ALSA
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 01:58:18PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Freitag, den 13.08.2010, 10:40 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:43:51PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
>Am Donnerstag, den 12.08.2010, 23:38 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
>> [1] or agree to repackage usi
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:01:43PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
BTW, I have another issue: This mailing list recieves a lot of
packaging related information which I#m not really interested in.
However, de just have this mailinglist debian-multime...@l.d.o. Do you
see a chance that we move discus
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 01:47:53PM +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
i do see all your latest changes. mine have been pushed 2hours before
yours (according to
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/gmerlin-avdecoder.git)
you should be able to see the upstream/1.0.3 tag.
Ohh, yes - silly me.
A
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:59:57PM +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> nice to see you keep pushing Debian Blends :)
Free, nice to hear from you again! \o/
> Yes, the DeMuDi idea is quite old and eventually evolved in the 64
> Studio project, which is more a Debian remix/customization than an
> offic
Am Freitag, den 13.08.2010, 10:40 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:43:51PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> >Am Donnerstag, den 12.08.2010, 23:38 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> >> [1] or agree to repackage using cdbs - I just won't you to get the
> >> impression that I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/13/2010 01:38 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> i have imported the latest (1.0.3) tarball using git-import-orig
>> (without any pristine-tar flags, since i didn't even know about them).
>> i'll probably leave it to jonas to get the upstream-tarball
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:59:57PM +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
Hi Andreas!
nice to see you keep pushing Debian Blends :)
|--==> On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:01:10 +0200, Andreas Tille
|--==> said:
AT> On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 11:50:16AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>As seen on the documentation
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:34:57PM +0200, IOhannes zmölnig wrote:
On 08/12/2010 11:08 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I just saw that IOhannes pushed the new 1.0.3 tarball, perhaps he's
working it now. IOhannes?
Even if so, it won't hurt to import the intermediary tarball.
i have to admit th
Hi Andreas!
nice to see you keep pushing Debian Blends :)
|--==> On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:01:10 +0200, Andreas Tille said:
AT> On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 11:50:16AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>As seen on the documentation, there is already a DeMuDi blend. Maybe we
>>can start from there? DeM
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:22:30PM +0200, IOhannes zmölnig wrote:
On 08/13/2010 12:05 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
so i have now switched from using dh directly to cdbs, assuming that
this fixes the issue and to get cdbs addicts back on board :-)
Awesome (for me).
For fairness sake, I should
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:31:03PM +0200, IOhannes zmölnig wrote:
On 08/13/2010 12:22 PM, IOhannes zmölnig wrote:
are there any tools for handling the NEWS file?
obviously "dch --news"
done. pushed.
Ah, I thought you meant user tools - and the answer there is to install
apt-listchanges.
On 08/12/2010 11:08 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>
>> I just saw that IOhannes pushed the new 1.0.3 tarball, perhaps he's
>> working it now. IOhannes?
>
> Even if so, it won't hurt to import the intermediary tarball.
>
i have to admit that i'm not very firm at with upstream-tarball.mk (and
cdbs
On 08/13/2010 12:22 PM, IOhannes zmölnig wrote:
> are there any tools for handling the NEWS file?
obviously "dch --news"
done. pushed.
fgmnsard
IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
On 08/13/2010 12:05 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>
>> so i have now switched from using dh directly to cdbs, assuming that
>> this fixes the issue and to get cdbs addicts back on board :-)
>
> Awesome (for me).
>
> For fairness sake, I should probably mention that I am the only one in
> this team
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:05:52AM +0200, IOhannes zmölnig wrote:
On 08/13/2010 10:13 AM, IOhannes zmölnig wrote:
Aand... short-form dh7 seems to not work correctly. since there is a
build directory, debian/rules build says that 'build' is up to date.
And phony targets do not seem to work w
On 08/13/2010 10:13 AM, IOhannes zmölnig wrote:
>
>>
>> Aand... short-form dh7 seems to not work correctly. since there is a
>> build directory, debian/rules build says that 'build' is up to date. And
>> phony targets do not seem to work with dh7.
>> This means that the package ends up being built
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:43:51PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 12.08.2010, 23:38 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
[1] or agree to repackage using cdbs - I just won't you to get the
impression that I lured you into this: most people in the multimedia
team are fine with - yeah,
On 08/13/2010 02:37 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>>
>>
>> ping.
thanks for reviewing
> Also, the copyright file could use some updating (what are your
> contributions, etc). There are some files with copyrights other than
> yourself.
thanks. there are some contributions in some files, which i have
Hi,
after subscribing this list I now get several e-mails about packages I
just don't know which are obviosely relevent for multimedia issues but I
just do not feel competent to put into the right task. Apt-cache told
me that projectm has for instance a binary package libprojectm-dev which
could
47 matches
Mail list logo
