Sean
So if I connect the dots in your equation below, it boils down to a
claim that this most dangerous movement (and I don't dispute its
dangerousness, although perhaps its mostness) is driven by Jewish
ethnic nationalism and passionate Israeli patriotism.
A) not true, not by a longshot. That's
Do you actually know anything about the intellectual history of
neoconservatism, or are you just making this stuff up as you go along? Which
neocon sources do you monitor regularly?
Have you read the last few decades of Commentary, which is the lead journal of
neoconservatism? I have.
--- In political-research@yahoogroups.com, tigerbengalis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Yet you feel the need to single out a Jewish
neo-con to compare to a protoNazi. Why? Are you saying current
American policy (which has hardly changed in decades, despite the
current ascenency of neocons) is a Jewish
Sean, Commentary has for decades been openly identified as a journal with a
focus on Jewish interests, from a conservative and now neo-con perspective.
Your calling the obsessed is quite offensive. It's like calling People mag
obsessed with celebrities. It's not an obsession if its commonly
--- In political-research@yahoogroups.com, Sean McBride
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you actually know anything about the intellectual history of
neoconservatism, or are you just making this stuff up as you go along?
Which neocon sources do you monitor regularly?
Having been aware of
Yes, I've read all your sources, and many more. But why don't you go straight
to the horse's mouth? Why not read the neocons in their own words? Commentary
is the best place to start. Go to the library and browse through a few decades
of back issues. I assume you have some speed reading
Ah -- you are making little sense. Clearly this is a highly emotional topic
for you, and I honestly think that you are incapable of thinking about it
objectively and clearly.
Commentary is not just any old Jewish magazine, it's the fountainhead of
neoconservatism and a haven for Jewish
--- In political-research@yahoogroups.com, Sean McBride
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:How obsessed are neocons with the Jews? You
be the judge. Here are some verbatim titles of Commentary articles:
For a journal sponsored by the American Jewish Committee, this is
what s/b expected. For a journal
--- In political-research@yahoogroups.com, Sean McBride
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:The anger against the neocons coming from the
American foreign policy establishment these days is electric and palpable.
Yes. Good old intra-ruling class divisions.
I say we go go back to good old Buchananite
Well, if you have no objections to Commentary, certainly you will have no
objections to white nationalist publications which rant on and on about their
ethnic enemies. The core theme of Commentary is that the Jews are locked in
an apocalyptic holy war against the rest of the human race. This
--- In political-research@yahoogroups.com, Sean McBride
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I've read all your sources, and many more. But why don't you go
straight to the horse's mouth? Why not read the neocons in their own
words? Commentary is the best place to start. Go to the library and
browse
--- In political-research@yahoogroups.com, Sean McBride
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Well, if you have no objections to Commentary,
certainly you will have no objections to white nationalist
publications which rant on and on about their ethnic enemies...
Get a grip, Sean. If you had any knowledge
A suggestion: if you and tigerbengalis don't want to appear to be neocon fellow
travelers, then stop trying to downplay the offenses of Commentary and the
neocons, and start dealing in an honest way with the influence of Jewish ethnic
militants on the Bush 43 administration and the Iraq War,
I say we go go back to good old , classical liberal, foreign
policy.
http://academic.evergreen.edu/g/grossmaz/interventions.html
A CENTURY OF U.S. MILITARY INTERVENTIONS
by Dr. Zoltan Grossman
The following is a partial list of U.S. military interventions from
1890 to 2007.
On 6/29/07, Sean McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:White ethnic
militants are a negligible factor in contemporary American politics...
So negligible that the GOP for decades has had Ethnic Outreach
Committees full of the most Fascist, anti-Communist sectors aligned
with WACL. Drawn upon in the
On 6/29/07, Sean McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:White ethnic
militants are a negligible factor in contemporary American politics...
If you lived in a neighborhood w/ immigrants from Central
America, like I have, hard working and loyal to the mainstream ,
American, values of family and
On 6/29/07, Sean McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:White ethnic
militants are a negligible factor in contemporary American politics...
http://www.buildingdemocracy.org/index.php?option=com_jmr_fmasid=1Itemid=91
Mapping the New Nativism is a comprehensive study of the location of
state and local
I'm curious: with which ethnic group do you most strongly identify? Which
ethnic tradition has most influenced you?
And do you support illegal immigration? Legal immigration is a fine American
tradition. Illegal immigration on the scale we are seeing it is a disaster.
Any administration
On 6/29/07, Sean McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm curious: with which ethnic group do you most strongly identify? Which
ethnic tradition has most influenced you?
I'm Italian-American. But, I don't identify that way. My
Italian-American relatives in Pittsburgh were all racists who
Well, I am not Italian, but I am a bit of an Italian chauvinist. I've spent
some time in Italy, and greatly admire the genius of Italian culture in almost
all its forms (maybe there are a few problems with the Corleone/Soprano
faction). And what I especially love about the Italians I've met
20 matches
Mail list logo
