l Message -
> From: Ricardo_Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: ProFox Email List
> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 20:13:43 -0300
> Subject: Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
>
>> Michael Madigan wrote:
>>> Lets see.
>&
But the list is long of who Iraq did attack, gas, promoted terrorism against,
torture,...
- Original Message -
From: Ricardo_Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ProFox Email List
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 20:13:43 -0300
Subject: Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
>
t; wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Ricardo,
>>>>
>>>> Haven't you worked out yet that in Michaels mind,
>> if
>>>> you criticize anything to do with Israel you are a
>>>> Jew Hater. Likewise were you to criticize GWB's
>
ttp://www.tccutlery.com
> http://www.bierschwale.com
> http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Michael Madigan
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 12:34 PM
> To: ProFox Email Li
Michael Madigan wrote:
> Kennedy stared the bastards in the eye and the
> Russians backed down.
>
> That's what we have to do with the rag heads.
>
Cool. So please, please go live in the twin towers when they rebuild
them. We'll see what the 'rag heads' have to do with you.
>
>
>
> --- Bill
ECTED] On Behalf
Of Leland Jackson
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 1:59 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
Neither has Iraq ever attacked the US. We were attacked by a small group of
Terrorist/Pirate on 9/11. The attackers pledged alliance
, January 15, 2007 1:14 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
On Jan 15, 2007, at 1:39 PM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
> I remember walking down an alley in the late 70's looking for a bar in
> alexandria egypt..
> A little ole guy c
Below is a definition of "Islam". Based on my understanding of the
Bible, as God's word to Christians, and all the divergence it has
created among the many Christian branches and denominations, I do not
understand how Islam in all of its divergence could unit as a group of
terrorist against the
So has Islam.
Leland Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Actually, German declared war on the
U.S.:
http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/timeline/germany-declares.htm
The first Gulf war was not without consequence, but what does this all
have to do with the attack of 9/11 by a group of terror
Actually, German declared war on the U.S.:
http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/timeline/germany-declares.htm
The first Gulf war was not without consequence, but what does this all
have to do with the attack of 9/11 by a group of terrorist?
http://www.historyguy.com/GulfWar.html
Regards,
Lel
No,
Iraq invaded Kuwait, a US Ally. Germany never
attacked us either.
--- Leland Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, Iraq has never attacked the US, but we have
> attacked Iraq at least
> twice. Is that correct?
>
> Regards,
>
> LelandJ
>
>
> Michael Madigan wrote:
>
> >We were sti
gt;
>>>>sails had been set,
>>>>and nothing shot of a conscience change in course
>>>>could have prevented
>>>>the Holocaust.
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>
>>>>LelandJ
>>>>
>>>>Michael Ma
gt;
> >>>
> >>>--- Adam Buckland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Ricardo
am Buckland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Ricardo,
>>>>
>>>>Haven't you worked out yet that in Michaels mind,
>>>>
&
ican
> >>Citizen. If you criticicized and are not a US
> >>citizen then you're a terrorist.
> >>
> >>::a
> >>
> >>PS He doesn't know the definition of liberal
> either.
> >>
> >>
> >>-Original Message-
On Jan 15, 2007, at 1:39 PM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
> I remember walking down an alley in the late 70's looking for a bar in
> alexandria egypt..
> A little ole guy come up missing an arm and knife cuts on his face
> and said
> you don't belong here.
Sounds like some of the locals in
>>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>>Ricardo Aráoz
>>Sent: 15 January 2007 09:16
>>To: ProFox Email List
>>Subject: Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to
>>offer o
ECTED] On Behalf
Of john harvey
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 12:37 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
I like the show, but I'm having a hard time figuring it out. I don't watch
it all the time, but it seems everytime I d
ttp://www.tccutlery.com
http://www.bierschwale.com
http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Michael Madigan
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 12:34 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
Based
Helio W.
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 10:26 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
Wrong show. You should watch Battlestar Galactica.
On 1/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> one thing I do agree with bill on
>
Kennedy stared the bastards in the eye and the
Russians backed down.
That's what we have to do with the rag heads.
--- Bill Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > We're at war today
> >
> > No. The war ended almost 4 years ago. We are an
> > occupying army now.
>
>
> We've got our fi
Based on past performance, what are the odds that Ed
is right about it? Zero?
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> let's hope you're right and I'm wrong
> -Original Message-
>
> From: Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subj: Re: [OT] Bush challenges
The same old shit. Mission Accomplished. He can't
come up with anything better.
--- Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2007, at 9:50 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > you don't know that for a fact
>
> Two words: Mission Accomplished.
>
> > I
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Ricardo Aráoz
> Sent: 15 January 2007 09:16
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to
> offer own plan
>
> Michael Madigan wrote:
>
There is no difference. I haven't met one Israeli
hater that wasn't a Jew-hater.
--- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Madigan wrote:
> > Of course the dirty Arabs attacked Israel on a
> Jewish
> > holy day. But of course a Jew-hater like you
> would
> > conveniently forget th
10:26 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
Wrong show. You should watch Battlestar Galactica.
On 1/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> one thing I do agree with bill on
> if you watched 24 last night there is a g
lf
Of Bill Arnold
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 9:52 AM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
> > We're at war today
>
> No. The war ended almost 4 years ago. We are an occupying army now.
We've got our finger
lesolutions.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ed Leafe
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 9:14 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
On Jan 15, 2007, at 9:50 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <
On Jan 15, 2007, at 10:52 AM, Bill Arnold wrote:
>> No. The war ended almost 4 years ago. We are an
>> occupying army now.
>
> We don't understand or respect our enemy.
We should be able to understand that they aren't that different from
us when it comes to dealing with an occupying arm
Below is the Neoconservative National Anthem from Notable Quotes:
#
No one likes us. I don't know why. We may not be perfect, We give them
money, But heaven knows we try. But are they grateful? But all around,
No, they're spiteful, Even our old friends put us down
Wrong show. You should watch Battlestar Galactica.
On 1/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> one thing I do agree with bill on
> if you watched 24 last night there is a guy taking all rights away
> forget his name, just look for the weasel
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIM
> > We're at war today
>
> No. The war ended almost 4 years ago. We are an
> occupying army now.
We've got our finger stuck in Muslim/Arab eyes, and we're one more
serious attack away from a far deeper appreciation of what's been
wrought on us by the warmongers occupying our capital and i
let's hope you're right and I'm wrong
-Original Message-
From: Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subj: Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
Date: Mon Jan 15, 2007 9:14 am
Size: 867 bytes
To: ProFox Email List
On Jan 15, 2007, at 9:50 AM, <[E
On Jan 15, 2007, at 9:50 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> you don't know that for a fact
Two words: Mission Accomplished.
> I believe its just a matter of time before new york is hit again
Hey, I believe that it's just a matter of time until the Packers win
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subj: Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
Date: Mon Jan 15, 2007 8:43 am
Size: 653 bytes
To: ProFox Email List
On Jan 15, 2007, at 9:04 AM, Bill Arnold wrote:
> We're at war today
No. The war ended almost 4 years ago. We are an occupyi
On Jan 15, 2007, at 9:04 AM, Bill Arnold wrote:
> We're at war today
No. The war ended almost 4 years ago. We are an occupying army now.
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscripti
We're at war today, and I believe it's in large measure due to the
influence of 'Soliders of Israel' in our gov't and media. They've teamed
up with bedfellows in Big Oil and the MI Complex to pull off "The most
dangerous foreign policy blunder in this country since Vietnam," as Sen
Hagel put it.
're a terrorist.
::a
PS He doesn't know the definition of liberal either.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz
Sent: 15 January 2007 09:16
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own pl
Michael Madigan wrote:
> Of course the dirty Arabs attacked Israel on a Jewish
> holy day. But of course a Jew-hater like you would
> conveniently forget that.
>
Did you mean to say Israeli-hater? Can you perceive the difference?
>
>
> --- Bill Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It wo
Michael Madigan wrote:
> Retard,
>
> Where did I say deport? I said they would obviously
> be more happy in another country. Maybe they can all
> go to Argentina where all the other Nazis went.
>
Nah! We are all retards around here. Ask your SS (a.k.a. secret service).
>
>
> --- Ricardo Ará
Pete Theisen wrote:
> On Sunday 14 January 2007 3:07 pm, Bill Arnold wrote:
>
>> The only real way to stop them is to stop people from wanting to use
>> them.
>
> Hi Bill!
>
> That is called "appeasement" Never worked.
Wow! And you know the 'correct' word. How's that called?
Anyway, if you know
I betcha Bush can get into Canada.
--- Pete Theisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 14 January 2007 8:33 am, Bill Arnold
> wrote:
>
> > Of course, because the central component of any
> real, workable plan
> > would start with making him and his gang culpable.
>
> Hi Bill!
>
> How abou
Put him in a home for his own safety.
> Hi Bill!
>
> Put you on trial for propaganda.
>
> Regards,
>
> Pete
>
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: ht
Of course the dirty Arabs attacked Israel on a Jewish
holy day. But of course a Jew-hater like you would
conveniently forget that.
--- Bill Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> It wouldn't matter to us much if they didn't
> control a commodity
> that
> > >> the whole world has developed a
Retard,
Where did I say deport? I said they would obviously
be more happy in another country. Maybe they can all
go to Argentina where all the other Nazis went.
--- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Madigan wrote:
> > Thanks Jeff.
> >
> > Sometimes you wonder if some of the
#16 Make Bill take his medicine.
#17 Make Bill wear his tin hat to block Dick Cheney
from getting into his mind.
#18 Blame the Illuminati and the Trilateral commission
#19 What does Edgar Cayce say about it?
#20 What about area 51?
#21 Don't leave Leo Wanta out of this equation
#22 Did John W
On Sunday 14 January 2007 3:10 pm, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
> it's just my view of the issue and as I live in a free country
> (Argentina) I'm entitled to it and to express it. Anyway I guess I'm in
> for some flak.
Hi Ricardo!
Yawn! Nothing you haven't delivered yourself of before.
--
Regards,
Pe
On Sunday 14 January 2007 3:07 pm, Bill Arnold wrote:
>
> The only real way to stop them is to stop people from wanting to use
> them.
Hi Bill!
That is called "appeasement" Never worked.
--
Regards,
Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/
___
Post Messag
On Sunday 14 January 2007 8:33 am, Bill Arnold wrote:
> Of course, because the central component of any real, workable plan
> would start with making him and his gang culpable.
Hi Bill!
How about if we make you do time for every illegal thing you ever done? You
want to prosecute the man when he
On Sunday 14 January 2007 7:58 am, Bill Arnold wrote:
> 'To oppose everything while proposing nothing is irresponsible,' he says
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16611409/from/RS.3/
>
> Okay then, here's a 15 point plan for those who say they oppose the war,
> but then can't figure out what to say whe
Come onn Virgil, would you let other countries pursue their
economic interests freely without US intervening? OK, maybe you would, but
US elites wouldn't.
It's not so simple as that. Reality is a big mess.
On 1/14/07, Virgil Bierschwale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For what its
l Bierschwale
http://www.virgilslist.com
http://www.tccutlery.com
http://www.bierschwale.com
http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Bill Arnold
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 5:00 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Sub
> Lets just say that we fall for this foolishness and we do it.
> And while we're making mistakes, lets assume that a court
> finds that they did nothing wrong .
>
> Whats next after this witch hunt ?
> Do we go after bill arnold because we all were foolish enough
> to follow him ?
Virgil, if
chwale.com
http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Bill Arnold
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 6:58 AM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
'To oppose everyth
> >> It wouldn't matter to us much if they didn't control a commodity
that
> >> the whole world has developed a dependence on.
> >> Oil When OPEC decided to flex their muscle in the mid 70's, it sent
shock
> >> waves through out the entire world economically speaking. Double
> >> digit inflation,
> > I agree! But, still, that house is burning now, and we've got to
come
> > up with a way to put it out in such a way that we don't wind up with
a
> > million people on a mission to hurt us.
>
> It is not your business to put away the fire. Enough damage
> you've already done. And there alr
Bill Arnold wrote:
>
>> It wouldn't matter to us much if they didn't control a commodity that
>> the whole world has developed a dependence on.
>> Oil
>> When OPEC decided to flex their muscle in the mid 70's, it sent shock
>> waves through out the entire world economically speaking. Double
>
Michael Madigan wrote:
> Thanks Jeff.
>
> Sometimes you wonder if some of the people on this
> list wouldn't enjoy the rest of their life better in
> some other country. What's keeping them here? Isn't
> it immoral for them to remain in such a terrible
> place? I think maybe they should move to
Jeff wrote:
> forest and trees
> I have seen way too many people ignoring some basic facts to why we
> are over there to begin with. 9/11 wasn't the first time we came
> across terrorism, it was just the first time that massive non
> combatant 'Infidel' were visual reported of Americans. The lis
Bill Arnold wrote:
> I want us out of there as much as you do, but I believe passions are
> stirred and wills are steeled, way beyond the climate that produced the
> 9/11 attack. If we had 10 thousand enemies then, we have a million now.
> Sure, I'm making these numbers up, but the point is that we
> forest and trees
> I have seen way too many people ignoring some basic facts to why we
> are over there to begin with. 9/11 wasn't the first time we came
> across terrorism, it was just the first time that massive non
> combatant 'Infidel' were visual reported of Americans. The list is
> lo
Thanks Jeff.
Sometimes you wonder if some of the people on this
list wouldn't enjoy the rest of their life better in
some other country. What's keeping them here? Isn't
it immoral for them to remain in such a terrible
place? I think maybe they should move to France.
--- Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED
forest and trees
I have seen way too many people ignoring some basic facts to why we
are over there to begin with. 9/11 wasn't the first time we came
across terrorism, it was just the first time that massive non
combatant 'Infidel' were visual reported of Americans. The list is
long of our deal
> > While we can blame the
> > gas or the match, one thing we can't do is just walk away as if we
had
> > no part it in.
>
> Even if "walking away", as you dismissively phrase it, would
improve
> the situation?
I want us out of there as much as you do, but I believe passions are
stirre
On Jan 14, 2007, at 11:41 AM, Bill Arnold wrote:
> While we can blame the
> gas or the match, one thing we can't do is just walk away as if we had
> no part it in.
Even if "walking away", as you dismissively phrase it, would improve
the situation?
We don't belong there. It's no
> > The thing is that the invasion resulted in civil war, so we're now
> > obliged to stop the fighting.
>
> That's a load of crap. We didn't cause the civil war;
> the roots of that go back a long time. The other countries in the area
saw the
> fall of Saddam as an opportunity to advan
On Jan 14, 2007, at 9:52 AM, Bill Arnold wrote:
> The thing is that the invasion resulted in civil war, so we're now
> obliged to stop the fighting.
That's a load of crap. We didn't cause the civil war; the roots of
that go back a long time. The other countries in the area saw the
f
> > Of course, because the central component of any real, workable plan
> > would start with making him and his gang culpable.
>
> I disagree. I can't believe that our troops who are
> there would rather wait and continue to be stuck in the middle of a
civil war
> while we figure out ho
On Jan 14, 2007, at 8:33 AM, Bill Arnold wrote:
> Of course, because the central component of any real, workable plan
> would start with making him and his gang culpable.
I disagree. I can't believe that our troops who are there would
rather wait and continue to be stuck in the middle o
> > 'To oppose everything while proposing nothing is irresponsible,' he
> > says
> > http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16611409/from/RS.3/
>
> This is the ultimate in silliness. There have been
> several proposals that Bush has dismissed out-of-hand because they
don't match his.
Of course, bec
On Jan 14, 2007, at 7:58 AM, Bill Arnold wrote:
> 'To oppose everything while proposing nothing is irresponsible,' he
> says
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16611409/from/RS.3/
This is the ultimate in silliness. There have been several proposals
that Bush has dismissed out-of-hand becau
'To oppose everything while proposing nothing is irresponsible,' he says
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16611409/from/RS.3/
Okay then, here's a 15 point plan for those who say they oppose the war,
but then can't figure out what to say when asked for a plan.
1. Put the neocon gangleaders on trial fo
72 matches
Mail list logo
