RE: [OT] Republicans and Reality

2007-02-14 Thread Adam Buckland
Alledgedly.

You take someone nice and normal say from New England, remove 3/4 of their 
brain, munch up their speech. 
Marry them off to their cousin, dump them in a trailer park, give them a dozen 
guns and a combined IQ to match.
Get them the largest pickup truck you can find then smash it up so it barely 
gets from the trailer park to the bar and back again and get them on welfare 
whilst working.

But then that'd just be a stereotype like some people do for Europeans etc





-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz
Sent: 14 February 2007 06:00
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Republicans and Reality

Ed Leafe wrote:
 On Feb 13, 2007, at 8:11 PM, john harvey wrote:
 
 Gee Ed, I had to edit your email for errors!
 
 [snip]
 
 For the last decade and a half, the Democrat party has pursued an
 
   Gee, you went to all that trouble, and yet you still can't handle  
 basic grammar. Maybe one of our foreign list members can explain  
 basic English to you, such as the difference between a noun  
 ('Democrat') and an adjective ('Democratic').
 
   You really should be more careful, or people might get the  
 impression that all Southerners are stupid.
 

I get the difference between a noun and an adjective, but. what is a
Southerner? ;c)

 -- Ed Leafe
 -- http://leafe.com
 -- http://dabodev.com
 
 
 
 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [OT] Republicans and Reality

2007-02-14 Thread Jean Laeremans
On 2/14/07, john harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hahahahahaha. I been knowing the difference.

tsssproblem with verbs too i see

A+
jml


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: Recommended Icon/Graphics Libraries Free or Commercial

2007-02-14 Thread Alan Bourke
I've been down the same road myself and have ended up cobbling together 
icons from various sources. I've never found a large repository of 
24-bit icons that you could use in applications. You're right, the sets 
supplied with VFP are in dire need of an overhaul, they're very Windows 95.



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] I've HAD IT WITH QUICKEN

2007-02-14 Thread mrgmhale
  I also have a CPA do my
 taxes because it is impossible for me to keep up with it.

Confessions of a Mad Man!  Actually, I am encouraged by your comment re:
having a CPA do your taxes despite your own background and expertise.  I was
feeling badly that I finally retained a CPA last year to do my taxes when
things got far more complex when I put my SoCal house into rental service
after 27 years of owning it and my kids finally having moved out after
graduating from university.

Worse yet, I actually had a colleague come over to do some simple hardware
work (for pay, not for free) the other day as I can not do the things I
could previously due to the pinched nerve issue I am contending with.  I
tried to do the work myself, and managed to pinch the same nerve again -
ouch, big time ouch!  I am not using to paying someone for doing what I am
otherwise quite proficient at myself.  But, since it was for my ftp Server
that I use commercially for clients I had little choice, and I had a narrow
time frame to get it back up with a replacement boot Hard Drive.

Gil

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff Johnson
 Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 11:25 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [NF] I've HAD IT WITH QUICKEN


  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  On Behalf Of Chet Gardiner
  Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 2:48 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: [NF] I've HAD IT WITH QUICKEN
 
  It's crap.
 
  What do you use for personal and/or business accounting?
 
  The only features that I really care about are to synchronizing my
  bank account information (which quicken is sh*tty at doing) and being
  able to automatically import the data into tax programs.
 
  ???
 

 I am a degreed accountant with many years in the field before turning to
 programming.  I use Quickbooks.  Always have, probably always will.  I
 download all of my credit cards and bank statements.  I run them through a
 VFP filter and then import them into Quickbooks.  I have used the
 SDK also,
 but haven't had time to do that for my own stuff.  I also have a CPA do my
 taxes because it is impossible for me to keep up with it.

 Jeff

 Jeff Johnson
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 623-582-0323
 Fax 623-869-0675



 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
 multipart/signed
   text/plain (text body -- kept)
   application/x-pkcs7-signature
 ---


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] I've HAD IT WITH QUICKEN

2007-02-14 Thread mrgmhale
I have used Quicken for personal finances for years, and QuickBooks Pro for
at least 6 years for business (I have some inventory, so only the Pro
version will do for me).  I never seriously considered using QuickBooks for
both business and personal finances, but it actually makes sense to do so.
I can not think of any good reason to not do so in fact.  Hmmm, with all
this snow we are getting out here things get real quiet with incoming calls.
Maybe that will keep me occupied during the impending slow days...

Gil

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Steve Ellenoff
 Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 12:30 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [NF] I've HAD IT WITH QUICKEN


 I've recently given up on quicken also and am curious to see what
 others suggest using.

 At 04:48 PM 2/13/2007, you wrote:
 It's crap.
 
 What do you use for personal and/or business accounting?
 
 The only features that I really care about are to synchronizing my
 bank account information (which quicken is sh*tty at doing) and being
 able to automatically import the data into tax programs.
 
 ???
 
 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: Recommended Icon/Graphics Libraries Free or Commercial

2007-02-14 Thread mrgmhale
One thing to consider for commercial apps, there are still some folks with
business that are running relatively weak machines as compared to what I am
running.  So I use Virtual PC to make certain my apps still look good in
lesser RAM and video configurations.  I try to make certain all my apps
still look good when using 16 bit color, even though 24/32 bit looks nicer.
I have to address the lowest common denominator, or risk having to remove
newer, flashier looking icons and color choices if a person were to need to
run my stuff on a (goodness!) Win 98 or weaker RAM/video PC.  I do have
minimum system requirements, and use InstallShield to test for minimum RAM,
screen resolution and video capability.  Every once in a while I get an
eMail or call about the app not being to get installed on some anemic PC
g...

Gil

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Steve Ellenoff
 Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 12:40 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Recommended Icon/Graphics Libraries Free or Commercial


 I'm not much of an artist and would really like to start jazzing up
 some of my apps with icons / graphics. The problem is I don't really
 know where to get nice looking graphics to include. The ones included
 with VFP look unprofessional, as do many of the freebies I've
 found on the net.

 If there's some really professional looking stuff, I don't mind
 paying for it, I just want to know what people are using..

 Some of the professional ones I've found just don't seem to fit into
 any of my apps, ie, they seem to target either hardware icons, like a
 cd drive or floppy, or certain other areas of interest which don't
 necessary translate into database applications as a theme. In fact,
 if some of the VFP ones just looked professional I'd probably be
 fairly happy with those.

 I'd appreciate hearing what you guys have used in the past/present,
 whether it's free or commerical.

 Thanks
 -Steve




[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: Recommended Icon/Graphics Libraries Free or Commercial

2007-02-14 Thread Dave Crozier
Steve,
For free nice looking ones take a look at 

http://www.famfamfam.com/

Dave Crozier

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Steve Ellenoff
Sent: 14 February 2007 05:40
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Recommended Icon/Graphics Libraries Free or Commercial

I'm not much of an artist and would really like to start jazzing up 
some of my apps with icons / graphics. The problem is I don't really 
know where to get nice looking graphics to include. The ones included 
with VFP look unprofessional, as do many of the freebies I've found on the
net.

If there's some really professional looking stuff, I don't mind 
paying for it, I just want to know what people are using..

Some of the professional ones I've found just don't seem to fit into 
any of my apps, ie, they seem to target either hardware icons, like a 
cd drive or floppy, or certain other areas of interest which don't 
necessary translate into database applications as a theme. In fact, 
if some of the VFP ones just looked professional I'd probably be 
fairly happy with those.

I'd appreciate hearing what you guys have used in the past/present, 
whether it's free or commerical.

Thanks
-Steve




[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [OT] Republicans and Reality

2007-02-14 Thread Stephen the Cook
Adam Buckland  wrote:
 Alledgedly.
 
 You take someone nice and normal say from New England, remove 3/4 of
 their brain, munch up their speech. 
 Marry them off to their cousin, dump them in a trailer park, give
 them a dozen guns and a combined IQ to match. 
 Get them the largest pickup truck you can find then smash it up so it
 barely gets from the trailer park to the bar and back again and get
 them on welfare whilst working.  
 
 But then that'd just be a stereotype like some people do for
 Europeans etc 

Looks like you’re a Jerry Springer fan.

Stephen Russell
DBA / .Net Developer

Memphis TN 38115
901.246-0159

A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who
can do them absolutely no good. ---Unknown

http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.37/682 - Release Date: 2/12/2007
1:23 PM
 



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [OT] Republicans and Reality

2007-02-14 Thread Adam Buckland
I did go and see the Jerry Springer opera but I'm just stereotyping some
of the people I've met on my travels through 47 states and one district!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stephen the Cook
Sent: 14 February 2007 12:06
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [OT] Republicans and Reality

Adam Buckland  wrote:
 Alledgedly.
 
 You take someone nice and normal say from New England, remove 3/4 of
 their brain, munch up their speech. 
 Marry them off to their cousin, dump them in a trailer park, give
 them a dozen guns and a combined IQ to match. 
 Get them the largest pickup truck you can find then smash it up so it
 barely gets from the trailer park to the bar and back again and get
 them on welfare whilst working.  
 
 But then that'd just be a stereotype like some people do for
 Europeans etc 

Looks like you're a Jerry Springer fan.

Stephen Russell
DBA / .Net Developer

Memphis TN 38115
901.246-0159

A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who
can do them absolutely no good. ---Unknown

http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.37/682 - Release Date:
2/12/2007
1:23 PM
 



[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Why a CPA for taxes was I've HAD IT WITH QUICKEN

2007-02-14 Thread Stephen the Cook
Jeff Johnson  wrote:

 I am a degreed accountant with many years in the field before turning
 to programming.  I use Quickbooks.  Always have, probably always
 will.  I download all of my credit cards and bank statements.  I run
 them through a VFP filter and then import them into Quickbooks.  I
 have used the SDK also, but haven't had time to do that for my own
 stuff.  I also have a CPA do my taxes because it is impossible for me
 to keep up with it.  

I have to ask this question.  Why is a certified public accountant the
person everyone turns to for getting their taxes done?  You are doing an
audit and you need the certified mark for submission or your looking for tax
law loop holes?

I know a few CPAs who are very busy this time of year but they specialize in
Star-Box work.  I wouldn't ask them for assistance in taxes but because they
are certified they have a ton of business. 



Stephen Russell
DBA / .Net Developer

Memphis TN 38115
901.246-0159

A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who
can do them absolutely no good. ---Unknown

http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.39/686 - Release Date: 2/14/2007
7:54 AM
 



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] I've HAD IT WITH QUICKEN

2007-02-14 Thread MB Software Solutions
Steve Ellenoff wrote:
 I've recently given up on quicken also and am curious to see what 
 others suggest using.
   
Steve -- why did you give up on it?

-- 
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] I've HAD IT WITH QUICKEN

2007-02-14 Thread Dave Crozier
Kevin,
Yes, Turbocash is written in Delphi and versions up to last September can
run when compiled with Kylix (The Linux fork of Delphi - which is no longer
in production however). I have installed a couple of systems and they went
in no problem with the addition of some bespoke code.

The man modules are solid and well written but not completely embracing OOP
as they mainly follow procedural programming lines but good nevertheless.

Documentation and end user support is excellent from the forums but my main
gripe was the number of updates which seem just too frequent for an
accounting system even though the mvast majority of changes are either
cosmetic or new features.

Well worth a look though.

Dave Crozier

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Kevin Cully
Sent: 14 February 2007 13:45
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] I've HAD IT WITH QUICKEN

I've written my own system that is an Everything system for me.  It is
not a double entry accounting system, but as an LLC my taxes are pretty
simple.  It has contact management, project management, invoicing,
expenses, AR, and reporting.  It currently is a WWWC app against VFP
tables.  My wife and I can both work with the data in our home network.
 I'm tempted to rewrite it with REALbasic so that it can run on Windows
and Linux against a MySQL or PostgreSQL backend and perhaps develop some
PHP front end for simple web operations.  In all of my free time!

I was Googling and TurboCash came up.  The USA version of the web site
has some broken links but the UK version of the web site looks complete.
 It's open sourced but only runs on Windows. f  I believe it is either
written in Delphi or some sort of Pascal.  I haven't picked through the
Wiki enough to really tell the current state.  It looks like it's worth
a look:

http://www.turbocashuk.com/

Steve Ellenoff wrote:
 I've recently given up on quicken also and am curious to see what 
 others suggest using.




[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] I've HAD IT WITH QUICKEN

2007-02-14 Thread Kevin Cully
Dave,
It looks like Delphi isn't going to be in production either. g  That
doesn't mean that Delphi or Turbocash won't be useful and productive for
years into the future!

I would think the main point of interest for developers on this forum is
that their next accounting system is open enough that they could
potentially extend the system, or access the data in such a way that
they could create custom reports or make small enhancements.  Via ODBC,
I would think that the TurboCash data would be available to this extent.

Thanks!

Dave Crozier wrote:
 Kevin,
 Yes, Turbocash is written in Delphi and versions up to last September can
 run when compiled with Kylix (The Linux fork of Delphi - which is no longer
 in production however). I have installed a couple of systems and they went
 in no problem with the addition of some bespoke code.
 
 The man modules are solid and well written but not completely embracing OOP
 as they mainly follow procedural programming lines but good nevertheless.
 
 Documentation and end user support is excellent from the forums but my main
 gripe was the number of updates which seem just too frequent for an
 accounting system even though the mvast majority of changes are either
 cosmetic or new features.
 
 Well worth a look though.
 
 Dave Crozier




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] I've HAD IT WITH QUICKEN

2007-02-14 Thread Dave Crozier
Kevin,
Well Delphi and the other Borland developer products may well be acquired
by outside interests as Borland themselves want to concentrate on other non
developer tools but judging by the turbo range of products  Delphi, C++,
C# and Delphi for .NET which are free) http://www.turboexplorer.com/ it
looks like they still have a future and are also aimed at the mass market - 

Like wot VFP should be!! BG

However, if there is one thing that is worse than dealing with VFP data via
ODBC, it is dealing with data controlled by the Borland BDE which I
absolutely hate which is the only down side I found with it!

However, the Turbocash remains a good product and recommended.
 
Dave Crozier


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Kevin Cully
Sent: 14 February 2007 14:08
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] I've HAD IT WITH QUICKEN

Dave,
It looks like Delphi isn't going to be in production either. g  That
doesn't mean that Delphi or Turbocash won't be useful and productive for
years into the future!

I would think the main point of interest for developers on this forum is
that their next accounting system is open enough that they could
potentially extend the system, or access the data in such a way that
they could create custom reports or make small enhancements.  Via ODBC,
I would think that the TurboCash data would be available to this extent.

Thanks!

Dave Crozier wrote:
 Kevin,
 Yes, Turbocash is written in Delphi and versions up to last September can
 run when compiled with Kylix (The Linux fork of Delphi - which is no
longer
 in production however). I have installed a couple of systems and they went
 in no problem with the addition of some bespoke code.
 
 The man modules are solid and well written but not completely embracing
OOP
 as they mainly follow procedural programming lines but good nevertheless.
 
 Documentation and end user support is excellent from the forums but my
main
 gripe was the number of updates which seem just too frequent for an
 accounting system even though the mvast majority of changes are either
 cosmetic or new features.
 
 Well worth a look though.
 
 Dave Crozier




[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: Recommended Icon/Graphics Libraries Free or Commercial

2007-02-14 Thread Derek Kalweit
 I'm not much of an artist and would really like to start jazzing up
 some of my apps with icons / graphics. The problem is I don't really
 know where to get nice looking graphics to include. The ones included
 with VFP look unprofessional, as do many of the freebies I've found on the 
 net.

I sunk a couple hundred dollars into some icon collections from this
place about a year ago:

http://www.iconshock.com/

It looks like they have a ton more now than they did back then.

They get high icon counts by layering smaller versions of icons on top
of bigger versions-- kinda like the way the arrow is in a shortcut,
but it makes a bit more sense, like a 'wrench' on top of a picture of
a 'user' to signify user management or something... I've used a small
handful of these combinations, but mostly just use the main icon
without the small icons on top. As a good rule, I'd probably take
their #'s and divide it by 10 or so to get a more accurate number of
truly unique icons

I've also changed a few in color-- say, a blue check mark to a green
checkmark. I use 'Iconomaker' to do this, where I can simply change
the 'levels'. Iconomaker is a very good app, but the publishers
discontinued it-- it's sad, 'cause it's the most sensible and
featureful icon editor I've ever used.


-- 
Derek


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Why a CPA for taxes was I've HAD IT WITH QUICKEN

2007-02-14 Thread Jeff Johnson
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of Stephen the Cook
 Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 5:15 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [NF] Why a CPA for taxes was I've HAD IT WITH QUICKEN
 
 Jeff Johnson  wrote:
 
  I am a degreed accountant with many years in the field before turning
  to programming.  I use Quickbooks.  Always have, probably always
  will.  I download all of my credit cards and bank statements.  I run
  them through a VFP filter and then import them into Quickbooks.  I
  have used the SDK also, but haven't had time to do that for my own
  stuff.  I also have a CPA do my taxes because it is impossible for me
  to keep up with it.
 
 I have to ask this question.  Why is a certified public accountant the
 person everyone turns to for getting their taxes done?  You are doing an
 audit and you need the certified mark for submission or your looking for
 tax
 law loop holes?
 
 I know a few CPAs who are very busy this time of year but they specialize
 in
 Star-Box work.  I wouldn't ask them for assistance in taxes but because
 they
 are certified they have a ton of business.
 
 
 
 Stephen Russell
 DBA / .Net Developer
 
 Memphis TN 38115
 901.246-0159
 
 A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who
 can do them absolutely no good. ---Unknown
 
 http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/
 

Hey Stephen:  I am self-un-employed and have been for 15 years.  If I were
getting a paycheck I would be doing my own taxes.  When it comes to
self-employment there are way too many factors to consider for me when doing
my taxes.  For example:  wages vs. dividends, office in residence, how I
treat my primary vehicle, computer and software purchases.  

Certified means that they meet requirements to keep their license.  Using
a non-certified tax preparer would be similar to using a Para-legal;
perfectly fine in most cases.  The important thing about a CPA is their
continuing education.  My CPA has 200 small businesses just like mine for
clients and he spends his continuing education studying the changes in tax
rules.

FYI - I also have a hardware guy that builds my computers, for the same
reason.  I can't keep up with the changes in hardware.  When I think of the
time I used to spend setting up a computer and installing OS and software,
it's embarrassing.

Jeff

Jeff Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
623-582-0323
Fax 623-869-0675


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/signed
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  application/x-pkcs7-signature
---


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: Recommended Icon/Graphics Libraries Free or Commercial

2007-02-14 Thread Jack Skelley
Steve:
I have collected over the years some 2400+ icons.
I have them in a zipped folder and will email it to you if you wish.
Regards,

Jack Skelley


Steve Ellenoff wrote:

 I'm not much of an artist and would really like to start jazzing up 
 some of my apps with icons / graphics. The problem is I don't really 
 know where to get nice looking graphics to include. The ones included 
 with VFP look unprofessional, as do many of the freebies I've found on the 
 net.
 
 If there's some really professional looking stuff, I don't mind 
 paying for it, I just want to know what people are using..
 
 Some of the professional ones I've found just don't seem to fit into 
 any of my apps, ie, they seem to target either hardware icons, like a 
 cd drive or floppy, or certain other areas of interest which don't 
 necessary translate into database applications as a theme. In fact, 
 if some of the VFP ones just looked professional I'd probably be 
 fairly happy with those.
 
 I'd appreciate hearing what you guys have used in the past/present, 
 whether it's free or commerical.
 
 Thanks
 -Steve
 
 
 
 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: Recommended Icon/Graphics Libraries Free or Commercial

2007-02-14 Thread Derek Kalweit
 I have collected over the years some 2400+ icons.
 I have them in a zipped folder and will email it to you if you wish.

Are these all royalty free? If so, I think a number of us would be
interested-- I know I would... Thanks.


-- 
Derek


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: Recommended Icon/Graphics Libraries Free or Commercial

2007-02-14 Thread Casey McGuire
Steve Ellenoff wrote:
 
 I'd appreciate hearing what you guys have used in the past/present, 
 whether it's free or commerical.
 

this one has some specific icons for database stuff
http://www.iconexperience.com/index.php

if you are 'ok' using the terms of use
http://tango.freedesktop.org/Tango_Desktop_Project

kc


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] I've HAD IT WITH QUICKEN

2007-02-14 Thread Bob Patterson

 We've been using old FoxPro 2.6 based accounting software
for years ... since the early 80's.This is the last evolution of
what WAS  SBT Accounting software.  It's still available, undergoing
updates, multi-user, and runs on Linux  Unix, and yes, the source code
comes with it !   NOT FREE - but very reasonably priced,
and rock-solid accounting that's easy to use  full featured.
Of course, it's text mode, with limited graphics (fast !),
but who needs flashy accounting !!!;-)

   http://www.accountixinc.com/

Free demos for d/l ..  legal FoxPro runtimes too ...

I'm sure everyone here could easily handle tweaking the
FoxPro source if needed ... ;-) Being FP, there's no problem
with importing  exporting !

-- 
   ..bobp
 http://www.prosumers.ca
 http://bpatterson.qhealthbeauty.com
 http://apatterson2.qhealthzone.com

  ---orig.- 
 On Wednesday 14 February 2007 05:29, Steve Ellenoff wrote:
 I've recently given up on quicken also and am curious to see what 
 others suggest using.
 
 At 04:48 PM 2/13/2007, you wrote:
 It's crap.
 
 What do you use for personal and/or business accounting?
 
 The only features that I really care about are to synchronizing my
 bank account information (which quicken is sh*tty at doing) and being
 able to automatically import the data into tax programs.
 
 ???
 
 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: I just got 3 photocopies of a 1099 from a client. That's not legal, is it?

2007-02-14 Thread Kristyne McDaniel
Madigan,

 That's not legal,is it?
 
 This guy sent me 3 photocopies of 1099s.
 
 Don't I have to provide originals to the IRS?

At least he sent you something. Selling 1099 forms is a profit center for
accounting software companies this time of year -- they're kinda expensive.
He's probably just trying to save a buck by making photocopies. 

Kristyne McDaniel
http://www.mcstyles.com
http://www.shamrocktrails.com




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] I've HAD IT WITH QUICKEN

2007-02-14 Thread Steve Ellenoff

Steve -- why did you give up on it?

I was fed up with their backhanded upgrade tactics. I've been 
upgrading every year since 98, and have noticed the software get 
worse in terms of bloat, relentless advertising stuck in your face, 
and in many ways I prefered the older versions ( the functionality 
seemed cleaner and easier to me ). When I hit version 2003 I decided 
I was done upgrading; I hadn't seen any compelling features to keep going.

Then I found out how Quicken basically disables some of the most 
crucial features of their software after a certain time frame which 
coincides with them dropping support for the product. I think they 
call this the sunset period or something. I don't care if they drop 
phone support ( it's useless anyway ), but to disable features, is criminal.

The most notable feature is the automatic downloading of credit card 
 bank account information. It basically stopped working after this 
date (which was about 5 months ago I think). I was warned many many 
times by the software that it would stop, and that I *must* upgrade, 
and I was even sent numerous emails about it.

I was and am still outraged at this tactic, so I decided instead of 
knuckling under, I would abandon them all together.

So I did, but now I'm looking for a replacement, and I'm unsure what 
to go with ( I've heard some horror stories about MS Money )..

-Steve






___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: Recommended Icon/Graphics Libraries Free or Commercial

2007-02-14 Thread Steve Ellenoff
Thanks Dave I'll check it out.

At 04:39 AM 2/14/2007, you wrote:
Steve,
For free nice looking ones take a look at

http://www.famfamfam.com/

Dave Crozier

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Steve Ellenoff
Sent: 14 February 2007 05:40
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Recommended Icon/Graphics Libraries Free or Commercial

I'm not much of an artist and would really like to start jazzing up
some of my apps with icons / graphics. The problem is I don't really
know where to get nice looking graphics to include. The ones included
with VFP look unprofessional, as do many of the freebies I've found on the
net.

If there's some really professional looking stuff, I don't mind
paying for it, I just want to know what people are using..

Some of the professional ones I've found just don't seem to fit into
any of my apps, ie, they seem to target either hardware icons, like a
cd drive or floppy, or certain other areas of interest which don't
necessary translate into database applications as a theme. In fact,
if some of the VFP ones just looked professional I'd probably be
fairly happy with those.

I'd appreciate hearing what you guys have used in the past/present,
whether it's free or commerical.

Thanks
-Steve




[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [OT] Republicans and Reality

2007-02-14 Thread Ed Leafe
On Feb 14, 2007, at 7:13 AM, Adam Buckland wrote:

 I did go and see the Jerry Springer opera but I'm just stereotyping  
 some
 of the people I've met on my travels through 47 states and one  
 district!

Getting away from talk of stereotypes and back to the original  
topic, it seems that the writer I quoted in the original post was  
quite correct. Republicans are recognizing that if they try to defend  
the President using facts, they will lose. They are consciously  
trying to avoid facts and instead focus on emotional arguments  
centering on terrorism, Islam, and all those other bogeymen.

http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2007/feb/13/ 
leaked_gop_letter_reveals_why_gop_doesnt_want_to_debate_escalation
( -or- http://tinyurl.com/2vbpw3 )

The following is an excerpt of a letter written by two Republican  
congressmen, John Shadegg and Peter Hoekstra, sent to the rest of the  
House Republicans:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
We are writing to urge you not to debate the Democratic Iraq  
resolution on their terms, but rather on ours.

Democrats want to force us to focus on defending the surge, making  
the case that it will work and explaining why the President's new  
Iraq policy is different from prior efforts and therefore justified.

We urge you to instead broaden the debate to the threat posed to  
Americans, the world, and all unbelievers by radical Islamists. We  
would further urge you to join us in educating the American people  
about the views of radical Islamists and the consequences of not  
defeating radical Islam in Iraq.

The debate should not be about the surge or its details. This debate  
should not even be about the Iraq war to date, mistakes that have  
been made, or whether we can, or cannot, win militarily. If we let  
Democrats force us into a debate on the surge or the current  
situation in Iraq, we lose.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


[NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread srussell
So, there's our first look at Vista. It does benefit from a lot of good
ideas, many of them Apple's, of course, but good nevertheless. It simply
doesn't work very well, unfortunately. There are serious problems with
execution; it's not polished; it's not ready. It should not be on the
market, and certainly not for the outrageous prices being charged. Don't
buy it, at least until after the first service pack is out. Don't pay to
be a beta tester. ®

http://www.theregister.com/2007/02/14/pricey_beta_bugger/




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


[NF] Software firm plans to move to Lansing

2007-02-14 Thread MB Software Solutions
http://www.lsj.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070214/NEWS03/702140354/1004/news

-- 
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Software firm plans to move to Lansing

2007-02-14 Thread Ed Leafe
On Feb 14, 2007, at 10:47 AM, MB Software Solutions wrote:

 http://www.lsj.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070214/ 
 NEWS03/702140354/1004/news

Wait: they're moving from Okemos to Lansing? How is this  
significant? That's only a couple of miles away.

-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


[OT] Gonna be easy!

2007-02-14 Thread Ed Leafe
http://images.ucomics.com/comics/tt/2007/tt070213.gif


-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


OLE Drag Drop Classes

2007-02-14 Thread Dave Crozier
To All,
Following Malcolm’s (I think it was him or Michael and I apologise for not
remembering) post regarding OLE drag/drop in VFP onto PageFrames where he
wanted to flip over pages in the PageFrame when the OLE object was moved
over the PageFrame got an idea in my brain going.

Hence, I’ve investigated OLD drag/drop further as I’m also on the next stage
of the Organizer project that I’ve not touched for a few months. Apart from
the OLE Drag/Drop is just plain cool once you can get your head around it.

In the Organizer, I thought it would be nice to be able to use OLE drag/Drop
as opposed the right click drag drop method that I’ve always used in the
past so the demo is a result of this investigation and two classes that can
be used anywhere OLE Drag/Drop is required on grids or pageframes

All you need to do is drag/drop a class onto either a PageFrame or a grid
and this gives instant Drag/Drop without any coding.

Also on the PageFrame you get a “Hot Button” effect where the mouse can
simply be moved over the page tabs and the active page will be changed
automatically even when NOT drag/Dropping which is useful.

You can download the demonstration and classes from:

http://www.replacement-software.co.uk/vfp/OLE_Drag_Drop/VFP_OLE_Drag_Drop.zi
p

I’m going to blog about the development next week after I return from Italy
and the full classes should be finished then with a revamp of the Organizer
so you’ll have to wait until then to sample the finished product but I’m
about 90% of the way there with the OLE drag/drop.

As usual any comments/observations are welcome good or bad. I’ve lots of
additions to make regarding dragging from Explorer/Windows/ Word/Excel etc
into VFP but that will come later on.

Hope it is of use to the group.

Dave Crozier


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.39/686 - Release Date: 14/02/2007
07:54
 




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Software firm plans to move to Lansing

2007-02-14 Thread Kevin Cully
Didn't you read the article?  Here's how it is significant: $1.2 million
business tax break bg

Ed Leafe wrote:
Wait: they're moving from Okemos to Lansing? How is this  
 significant?



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread Alan Bourke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 http://www.theregister.com/2007/02/14/pricey_beta_bugger/
   

I don't know about the rest of what he says, not having tried it yet, but:

  Aero looks nearly as good as KDE, although it demands about three 
times the system resources.

That's a ridiculous statement. First, in no way does vanilla KDE look 
anything like as good as Aero, although you can make it look that good. 
Secondly, is the comparison of system resources between the 
fundamentally different Linux and Windows architectures a valid one? I 
don't think so. What system resources, anyway?


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


[OT] Same old, same old...

2007-02-14 Thread Ed Leafe
http://images.ucomics.com/comics/po/2007/po070212.gif


-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: OLE Drag Drop Classes

2007-02-14 Thread Dave Crozier
Just a note,
The classes have a small gotcha if not used in VFP9 as there is a global
include file (foxpro.h) which it expects in the VFP 9 folder so just change
the include file reference in the classes if it is anywhere else.

Dave Crozier



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Dave Crozier
Sent: 14 February 2007 16:18
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: OLE Drag Drop Classes

To All,
Following Malcolm’s (I think it was him or Michael and I apologise for not
remembering) post regarding OLE drag/drop in VFP onto PageFrames where he
wanted to flip over pages in the PageFrame when the OLE object was moved
over the PageFrame got an idea in my brain going.

Hence, I’ve investigated OLD drag/drop further as I’m also on the next stage
of the Organizer project that I’ve not touched for a few months. Apart from
the OLE Drag/Drop is just plain cool once you can get your head around it.

In the Organizer, I thought it would be nice to be able to use OLE drag/Drop
as opposed the right click drag drop method that I’ve always used in the
past so the demo is a result of this investigation and two classes that can
be used anywhere OLE Drag/Drop is required on grids or pageframes

All you need to do is drag/drop a class onto either a PageFrame or a grid
and this gives instant Drag/Drop without any coding.

Also on the PageFrame you get a “Hot Button” effect where the mouse can
simply be moved over the page tabs and the active page will be changed
automatically even when NOT drag/Dropping which is useful.

You can download the demonstration and classes from:

http://www.replacement-software.co.uk/vfp/OLE_Drag_Drop/VFP_OLE_Drag_Drop.zi
p

I’m going to blog about the development next week after I return from Italy
and the full classes should be finished then with a revamp of the Organizer
so you’ll have to wait until then to sample the finished product but I’m
about 90% of the way there with the OLE drag/drop.

As usual any comments/observations are welcome good or bad. I’ve lots of
additions to make regarding dragging from Explorer/Windows/ Word/Excel etc
into VFP but that will come later on.

Hope it is of use to the group.

Dave Crozier


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.39/686 - Release Date: 14/02/2007
07:54
 




[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] I've HAD IT WITH QUICKEN

2007-02-14 Thread John Weller
I accept that my experiences in UK are possibly not relevant to the US but I
use Excel.  I just keep a record of my income and expenditure and then pass
it to my accountant who checks it to tell me what I should be including
(like heating and lighting for my office at home) and what I will be pushing
my luck if I include then sends the results off to the Revenue.

John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Steve Ellenoff
 Sent: 14 February 2007 15:29
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [NF] I've HAD IT WITH QUICKEN



 Steve -- why did you give up on it?

 I was fed up with their backhanded upgrade tactics. I've been
 upgrading every year since 98, and have noticed the software get
 worse in terms of bloat, relentless advertising stuck in your face,
 and in many ways I prefered the older versions ( the functionality
 seemed cleaner and easier to me ). When I hit version 2003 I decided
 I was done upgrading; I hadn't seen any compelling features to keep going.





___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread Derek Kalweit
  http://www.theregister.com/2007/02/14/pricey_beta_bugger/

 I don't know about the rest of what he says, not having tried it yet, but:

FWIW, I tried it for about 20min in a virtual machine, and I think he
was pretty kind. I hated the blasted thing. My limited opinion on it
stands that Vista is just yet another money-grab by MS, and the
outrageous pricing just accents that.


-- 
Derek


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


VFP + Vista + Cleartype = problem

2007-02-14 Thread Brian Abbott
Developing on XP I have Cleartype turned off - I think VFP is much more 
readable that way and it doesn't have too much impact on other programs.

Yesterday I started doing some development on Vista for the first time. 
First thing I noticed was that cleartype (which is on by default) seems 
to make VFP even more unreadable than in XP (to the point where after an 
hour of trying it I got a headache).  So I turned cleartype off.  VFP is 
now perfectly readable, but several other programs (notably Thunderbird) 
are really bad - much, much worse than in XP.

I've experimented with the cleartype tuner, different versions of vfp (8 
and 9) and different fonts.  Nothing seems to make much difference.  I'm 
dual booting XP and Vista so the video cards and TFT screens are the 
same.  For the moment at least I'm back to using XP unless I need to 
test something under Vista.

Has anyone else experienced anything similar?

-- 
Cheers


Brian Abbott

ACA Systems



-- 
Cheers


Brian Abbott



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread Alan Bourke
Yep, it's pricey - especially in EU compared to US but I suppose that's 
what we get for busting their balls on the IE thing. The OEM versions 
are way cheaper but limit you to only ever installing it on one PC.

Everyone hated XP when it came out as well, because things had been 
moved from where they were in 2000, so that in itself doesn't bother me.


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [OT] Republicans and Reality

2007-02-14 Thread john harvey
Sounds to me like he's been to Atoka, TN, except he forgot the thing about
the teeth!G

John

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Stephen the Cook
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 6:06 AM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [OT] Republicans and Reality

Adam Buckland  wrote:
 Alledgedly.
 
 You take someone nice and normal say from New England, remove 3/4 of
 their brain, munch up their speech. 
 Marry them off to their cousin, dump them in a trailer park, give
 them a dozen guns and a combined IQ to match. 
 Get them the largest pickup truck you can find then smash it up so it
 barely gets from the trailer park to the bar and back again and get
 them on welfare whilst working.  
 
 But then that'd just be a stereotype like some people do for
 Europeans etc 

Looks like you're a Jerry Springer fan.

Stephen Russell
DBA / .Net Developer

Memphis TN 38115
901.246-0159

A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who
can do them absolutely no good. ---Unknown

http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.37/682 - Release Date: 2/12/2007
1:23 PM
 



[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread Ed Leafe
On Feb 14, 2007, at 12:13 PM, Alan Bourke wrote:

 Everyone hated XP when it came out as well, because things had been
 moved from where they were in 2000, so that in itself doesn't  
 bother me.

I'll keep that quote in mind the next time someone says that Linux  
will never catch on, since things aren't in exactly the same place as  
what they're used to in Windows.

-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread Derek Kalweit
 Everyone hated XP when it came out as well, because things had been
 moved from where they were in 2000, so that in itself doesn't bother me.

Many people I know are still on W2K due to what MS did with
XP(primarily activation hassles).  Vista promises to make even more
hassles. Maybe even worse than Windows 2003-- the O/S I've lost the
MOST productivity ever to, due to 'security features' that give you
absolutely NO CLUE as to how to fix, or even that there is a
problem(such as returning 404 errors for every IIS problem instead of
a real error-- ANYWHERE).

Vista will take a LONG time for mainstream adoption, just as Windows
XP did, but I think it'll be even longer this time.


-- 
Derek


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread Alan Bourke
Ed Leafe wrote:
   I'll keep that quote in mind the next time someone says that Linux  
 will never catch on, since things aren't in exactly the same place as  
 what they're used to in Windows.
   
That's probably the least of the hurdles facing it on the corporate desktop!


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread Derek Kalweit
  Vista will take a LONG time for mainstream adoption, just as Windows
  XP did, but I think it'll be even longer this time.

 I think you're right, as there is much less of a compelling reason to go
 from XP SP2 to Vista than there was from 2k to XP.

I was thinking that when I wrote this comment, but it's hard for me to
think of any specific reasons XP is better than W2K... Only a few
ideas come to mind:

 o new 'look and feel'/themes
 o Easy Alternate IP configuration for NIC's(useful for laptops)
 o ClearType fonts
 o Better handling of multiple monitors
 o Able to run IE7(Microsoft's attempt at forcing late adopters from W2K to XP)

Quite a lackluster list, honestly... It makes me wonder why I have XP
installed at home and want it here at work...


-- 
Derek


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread Derek Kalweit
I'll keep that quote in mind the next time someone says that Linux
  will never catch on, since things aren't in exactly the same place as
  what they're used to in Windows.

 That's probably the least of the hurdles facing it on the corporate desktop!

The #1 reason, obviously being that Linux can't [legally] run Visual
Foxpro applications. :-)


-- 
Derek


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: VFP + Vista + Cleartype = problem

2007-02-14 Thread mrgmhale
Hmmm, I will stay tuned for input from others.  Interesting...  Thanks for
the Heads Up.

Gil

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brian Abbott
 Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 12:09 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: VFP + Vista + Cleartype = problem


 Developing on XP I have Cleartype turned off - I think VFP is much more
 readable that way and it doesn't have too much impact on other programs.

 Yesterday I started doing some development on Vista for the first time.
 First thing I noticed was that cleartype (which is on by default) seems
 to make VFP even more unreadable than in XP (to the point where after an
 hour of trying it I got a headache).  So I turned cleartype off.  VFP is
 now perfectly readable, but several other programs (notably Thunderbird)
 are really bad - much, much worse than in XP.

 I've experimented with the cleartype tuner, different versions of vfp (8
 and 9) and different fonts.  Nothing seems to make much difference.  I'm
 dual booting XP and Vista so the video cards and TFT screens are the
 same.  For the moment at least I'm back to using XP unless I need to
 test something under Vista.

 Has anyone else experienced anything similar?

 --
 Cheers

 
 Brian Abbott

 ACA Systems
 


 --
 Cheers

 
 Brian Abbott
 


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread mrgmhale
   I'll keep that quote in mind the next time someone says that Linux
 will never catch on, since things aren't in exactly the same place as
 what they're used to in Windows.


Good shot!

Gil

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Leafe
 Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 12:24 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be


 On Feb 14, 2007, at 12:13 PM, Alan Bourke wrote:

  Everyone hated XP when it came out as well, because things had been
  moved from where they were in 2000, so that in itself doesn't
  bother me.

   I'll keep that quote in mind the next time someone says that Linux
 will never catch on, since things aren't in exactly the same place as
 what they're used to in Windows.

 -- Ed Leafe
 -- http://leafe.com
 -- http://dabodev.com




[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread mrgmhale
 Vista will take a LONG time for mainstream adoption, just as Windows
 XP did, but I think it'll be even longer this time.


I think Vista will roll out far faster than we would like.  Many PC
manufacturers are providing Vista now, unless you want a very expensive
business class PC, where you can still get XP for a while.  A friend of mine
lost his PC the other weekend, had been using XP home (light duty stuff).
All he saw for new PCs at the major retail stores is Vista this and Vista
that.  Some XP Media PCs are still on the market, but they are pretty
expensive relative to what his needs are.  Now, if M$ were to do as the
Blu-Ray (and in decades past VHS vs BetaMax) folks are supposedly doing, and
try to edge into the benefits of Vista to the porn industry we are all dead
g!

Gil

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Derek Kalweit
 Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 12:26 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be


  Everyone hated XP when it came out as well, because things had been
  moved from where they were in 2000, so that in itself doesn't bother me.

 Many people I know are still on W2K due to what MS did with
 XP(primarily activation hassles).  Vista promises to make even more
 hassles. Maybe even worse than Windows 2003-- the O/S I've lost the
 MOST productivity ever to, due to 'security features' that give you
 absolutely NO CLUE as to how to fix, or even that there is a
 problem(such as returning 404 errors for every IIS problem instead of
 a real error-- ANYWHERE).

 Vista will take a LONG time for mainstream adoption, just as Windows
 XP did, but I think it'll be even longer this time.


 --
 Derek


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread Whil Hentzen (Pro*)
Derek Kalweit wrote:
   I'll keep that quote in mind the next time someone says that Linux
 will never catch on, since things aren't in exactly the same place as
 what they're used to in Windows.
 
 That's probably the least of the hurdles facing it on the corporate desktop!
 
 The #1 reason, obviously being that Linux can't [legally] run Visual
 Foxpro applications. :-)

Well, that's not exactly true. MSFT has _no_ problem with running VFP on 
Linux if you buy a copy of Fox for every end-user. (Well, no more a 
problem than they have with you running VFP on Windows, ahem...)

The place where they're spreading fud is the runtime issue.

Whil


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread mrgmhale
 I was thinking that when I wrote this comment, but it's hard for me to
 think of any specific reasons XP is better than W2K... Only a few
 ideas come to mind:


I sill run Pro2k on several machines, but on my primary communication PC I
do use XP Pro.  Largely to be familiar with it for clients questions.  I
find Win2k has a smaller RAM footprint, runs fast, and is reliable.  But at
some point it will no longer get the updates (less likely to need them g)
we get today.  I also run NT4 Server sp6a, Server 2000 and Server 2003,
again just to be familiar with them, and how they all interact.

That said, here is the one major benefit I find in running XP and Server
2003 over Win2k Pro/Server...  For backup software that supports it, these
newer OSes have Virtual Shadow-Copy Service (VSS), which allows me to back
up files that are open (I use SyncBack, more on that below).  On some PCs I
use Norton Ghost v-9/10, or Norton Save  Restore to automatically burn
weekly images of my boot HDD units, and retain the most recent 4 image sets
(I limit the target file size to 4.0Gb, not 4.7Gb, as some DVD burning apps
can't handle files over 4.0Gb).  On my Servers I use r-tt.com's
r-DriveImage, $50, and it works great unless you need to boot off the CD and
restore to an SATA HDD.  For that I use a separate machine to restore an
SATA drive as their CD boot loader does not handle SATA, although in
run-time under Windows it works fine burning images from SATA HDDs.

Back to SyncBack and VSS, a personal license for SyncBack generously covers
you for up to 5 PCs.  For business use they want a license per PC (I think
it is now $30 or $35/license, I have one per PC).  To use VSS you must be
running XP or 2003 (don't know about Vista), the source HDD must be a local
unit, you must be running NTFS format (compressed or not), and VSS must be
running as a service (some times it has to be set to run automatically).  It
is the cat's meow, and certainly makes XP/2003 a viable choice just to make
certain I am getting solid backups of my .pst, quicken and quickbooks files
as I rarely close those apps.

Gil



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Derek Kalweit
 Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 12:35 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be


   Vista will take a LONG time for mainstream adoption, just as Windows
   XP did, but I think it'll be even longer this time.

  I think you're right, as there is much less of a compelling reason to go
  from XP SP2 to Vista than there was from 2k to XP.

 I was thinking that when I wrote this comment, but it's hard for me to
 think of any specific reasons XP is better than W2K... Only a few
 ideas come to mind:

  o new 'look and feel'/themes
  o Easy Alternate IP configuration for NIC's(useful for laptops)
  o ClearType fonts
  o Better handling of multiple monitors
  o Able to run IE7(Microsoft's attempt at forcing late adopters
 from W2K to XP)

 Quite a lackluster list, honestly... It makes me wonder why I have XP
 installed at home and want it here at work...


 --
 Derek


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread Derek Kalweit
 I was thinking that when I wrote this comment, but it's hard for me to
 think of any specific reasons XP is better than W2K... Only a few
 ideas come to mind:

  o new 'look and feel'/themes
  o Easy Alternate IP configuration for NIC's(useful for laptops)
  o ClearType fonts
  o Better handling of multiple monitors
  o Able to run IE7(Microsoft's attempt at forcing late adopters from W2K to 
 XP)

 Quite a lackluster list, honestly... It makes me wonder why I have XP
 installed at home and want it here at work...

Ah-- just remembered the #1 reason to go to WINXP Pro from W2K Pro--
Remote Desktop. Far superior to the alternatives, in practice, I've
found. UltraVNC is more likely to crash my host computer and performs
poorly over slow links


-- 
Derek


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: OLE Drag Drop Classes

2007-02-14 Thread Steve Ellenoff
That sounds like a great contribution to the community, thanks Dave.

At 11:18 AM 2/14/2007, you wrote:
To All, Following Malcolm's (I think it was him or Michael and I 
apologise for not remembering) post regarding OLE drag/drop in VFP 
onto PageFrames where he wanted to flip over pages in the PageFrame 
when the OLE object was moved over the PageFrame got an idea in my 
brain going. Hence, I've investigated OLD drag/drop further as I'm 
also on the next stage of the Organizer project that I've not 
touched for a few months. Apart from the OLE Drag/Drop is just plain 
cool once you can get your head around it. In the Organizer, I 
thought it would be nice to be able to use OLE drag/Drop as opposed 
the right click drag drop method that I've always used in the past 
so the demo is a result of this investigation and two classes that 
can be used anywhere OLE Drag/Drop is required on grids or 
pageframes All you need to do is drag/drop a class onto either a 
PageFrame or a grid and this gives instant Drag/Drop without any 
coding. Also on the PageFrame you get a Hot Button effect where 
the mouse can simply be moved over the page tabs and the active page 
will be changed automatically even when NOT drag/Dropping which is 
useful. You can download the demonstration and classes from: 
http://www.replacement-software.co.uk/vfp/OLE_Drag_Drop/VFP_OLE_Drag_Drop.zi 
p I'm going to blog about the development next week after I return 
from Italy and the full classes should be finished then with a 
revamp of the Organizer so you'll have to wait until then to sample 
the finished product but I'm about 90% of the way there with the OLE 
drag/drop. As usual any comments/observations are welcome good or 
bad. I've lots of additions to make regarding dragging from 
Explorer/Windows/ Word/Excel etc into VFP but that will come later 
on. Hope it is of use to the group. Dave Crozier -- No virus found 
in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 
7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.39/686 - Release Date: 14/02/2007 
07:54 ___ Post Messages 
to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: 
http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this 
list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, 
unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, 
and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is 
added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.





___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread mrgmhale
 I don't know about the rest of what he says, not having tried it yet, but:

I have been waiting for VPC 2007 to come out of beta (I heard from a
colleague this morning it is now released, I have not checked).  But an
associate of mine went to a M$ sponsored seminar yesterday in Rochester, NY,
and called me this morning with all the crapola being positioned as
beneficial for all PC users by M$.  Several of her questions re: migrating
files with security settings from one HDD to another without losing said
security settings were pooh-poohed, as were several other questions by she
and several other folks amongst the almost 400 attendees.  Although the
presenters were linguistically polite, she told me the majority of answers
were condescending (now, now, little girl, it really is good for you to not
get a clear answer as that would involve deep complexities IN A ROOM FULL OF
IT PROFESSIONALS!).  And the matter of Vista being so protected it will not
run without security warnings popping up, hence the practical need to
disable said protections, was asked about.  The answer was more political
than technical, it was never answered, just danced around.  For folks with
compatibility issues the stock answer was to simply use VPC with an
earlier OS (XP, 2000 Pro)!   I wish I had gone.

So, once I do get VPC 2007, and install Vista Ultimate, and provide 1.5Gb
RAM to the VPC session, I will start testing my VFP and ProComm apps.  And,
if indeed there are issues I will need to see what happens when I compile
them in VFP9 (I code in VFP9, but compile in VFP7).  If they run okay then I
guess I am going to have to force a run-time update from VFP7 to VFP9 on my
End Users, or have a Vista and non-Vista version for folks.  And, of course,
if I can't get VFP compiled versions to run I will need to have my clients
use VPC, with the additional RAM of course.  Craziness.

Oh, in the Register article Stephen Russell sent to us (see below), did
y'all catch the deal where FireFox can't be made the default browser?  Very
clever.  M$ allows other browsers to be used (maybe g), but only IE7 can
be the default?  Talk about slicing hairs...  Technically compliant with the
DOJ ruling, but virtually neutering FireFox, Opera, etc. from getting a firm
displacement foothold in our browsing experience regardless of what the End
User wants to use for a default browser.  I hope I find this guy is all
wrong in his findings, and my one colleague overstated her concerns after
attending the M$ Vista seminar.

Okay, back to other stuff...

Gil



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alan Bourke
 Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 11:25 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  http://www.theregister.com/2007/02/14/pricey_beta_bugger/
 

 I don't know about the rest of what he says, not having tried it yet, but:

   Aero looks nearly as good as KDE, although it demands about three
 times the system resources.

 That's a ridiculous statement. First, in no way does vanilla KDE look
 anything like as good as Aero, although you can make it look that good.
 Secondly, is the comparison of system resources between the
 fundamentally different Linux and Windows architectures a valid one? I
 don't think so. What system resources, anyway?


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Why a CPA for taxes was I've HAD IT WITH QUICKEN

2007-02-14 Thread Dan Neuman
Stephen,

Besides all the changes in the tax laws, and what is deductible and what
is not, especially when it comes to self-employment which is all a minor
consideration for the rate difference... The real benefit is a CPA can
sit in an IRS audit with you and defned your tax return.  The pimple kid
from HR Block can not, and you are stuck there defending what the kid
input for you.

But, just like programmers, there are really good CPAs and really bad
CPAs.  When I was interviewing CPAs, my first question was how many IRS
audits have you defended and won v. lost? And tell me what you learned
from those experiences.


Dan


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [OT] Republicans and Reality

2007-02-14 Thread Michael Madigan
They gave you a visa?


--- Adam Buckland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I did go and see the Jerry Springer opera but I'm
 just stereotyping some
 of the people I've met on my travels through 47
 states and one district!
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Stephen the Cook
 Sent: 14 February 2007 12:06
 To: 'ProFox Email List'
 Subject: RE: [OT] Republicans and Reality
 
 Adam Buckland  wrote:
  Alledgedly.
  
  You take someone nice and normal say from New
 England, remove 3/4 of
  their brain, munch up their speech. 
  Marry them off to their cousin, dump them in a
 trailer park, give
  them a dozen guns and a combined IQ to match. 
  Get them the largest pickup truck you can find
 then smash it up so it
  barely gets from the trailer park to the bar and
 back again and get
  them on welfare whilst working.  
  
  But then that'd just be a stereotype like some
 people do for
  Europeans etc 
 
 Looks like you're a Jerry Springer fan.
 
 Stephen Russell
 DBA / .Net Developer
 
 Memphis TN 38115
 901.246-0159
 
 A good way to judge people is by observing how they
 treat those who
 can do them absolutely no good. ---Unknown
 
 http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/
 
 -- 
 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.37/682 -
 Release Date:
 2/12/2007
 1:23 PM
  
 
 
 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: VFP + Vista + Cleartype = problem

2007-02-14 Thread Richard Kaye
I know Rick Strahl has blogged on his opinion of Cleartype but don't 
know if he's revisited under Vista.

Brian Abbott wrote:
 Developing on XP I have Cleartype turned off - I think VFP is much more 
 readable that way and it doesn't have too much impact on other programs.


   

-- 
Richard Kaye
Vice President
Artfact/RFC Systems
Voice: 617.219.1038
Fax:  617.219.1001

For the fastest response time, please send your support
queries to:

Technical Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Australian Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All Other Requests - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
This message has been checked for viruses before sending.
-



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread Whil Hentzen (Pro*)
 Oh, in the Register article Stephen Russell sent to us (see below), did
 y'all catch the deal where FireFox can't be made the default browser?  Very
 clever.  M$ allows other browsers to be used (maybe g), but only IE7 can
 be the default?  Talk about slicing hairs...  Technically compliant with the
  DOJ ruling, but virtually neutering FireFox, Opera, etc. from getting

How is that compliant?

I'd raise holy hell about that one.

Whil



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: VFP + Vista + Cleartype = problem

2007-02-14 Thread Kevin Cully
Rich Schummer blogged a couple of days ago about a new font in VS 2005.
 I'm not sure if the Consolas Font Pack applies to Vista's Cleartype or not.

http://rickschummer.com/blog/2007/02/consolas-font-paying-it-forward.html

Richard Kaye wrote:
 I know Rick Strahl has blogged on his opinion of Cleartype but don't 
 know if he's revisited under Vista.
 
 Brian Abbott wrote:
 Developing on XP I have Cleartype turned off - I think VFP is much more 
 readable that way and it doesn't have too much impact on other programs.


   
 



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


[OT] Climate getting warmer

2007-02-14 Thread Helio W.
Exxon leader: 'Climate getting warmer'
By DAN PILLER
Star-Telegram Staff Writer
http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/16689019.htm

HOUSTON — Exxon Mobil Chairman Rex Tillerson told a world energy
conference today that there is no question that the world's climate
is getting warmer, and said that technological advances and a global
strategy will be needed to combat the rise in carbon emissions.

It is foolish for individual countries to engage in their own actions
because it won't do much more than make them feel good, Tillerson
said. It is particularly important for the emerging economies of the
Pacific Rim, where the biggest increases in carbon emissions will
occur, to take part in the discussions.

Tillerson's remarks, to the annual Cambridge Energy Research
Associates conference, marked a continuation of Exxon Mobil's growing
strategy to make itself part of the global climate debate rather than
denying that the problem exists. More than 2,000 people from 44
countries are attending the CERA conference.

Tillerson also said Exxon doesn't feel threatened by the rising
interest in alternative or renewable energy.

We don't feel threatened by alternative or renewable energy, he
said. We welcome it. But we have to remember that in the huge scale
of energy demand, fossil fuels will account for at least two-thirds of
energy consumption for at least the next 25 years.

Tillerson said the Irving-based multinational oil giant has devoted
relatively little money to alternative and renewable energy, aside
from a research project at Stanford University, because we are a
petroleum company. That's what we do, and we do it well.

We want to be able to add value to new energy, besides just money,
Tillerson said at a news conference following his speech. Money isn't
the problem in renewable energy.

Tillerson didn't offer specific actions that nations should adopt to
combat climate change but said technology can provide the bulk of the
answers.

The public and policymakers are largely unaware of the improved
technologies that make our industry so much more efficient and reduce
our environmental footprint, said Tillerson, a native of Wichita
Falls who succeeded Lee Raymond as Exxon Mobil chairman 14 months ago.

Tillerson spoke of what he called a disconnect between the oil
industry and the media and policymakers over energy and environmental
issues. He noted that while politicians think in terms of two or
four-year election cycles, the energy industry thinks in terms of a
two- or four-decade cycle for project development.

He added that additional taxes on the energy industry would impede
investment in expanded energy production.

It is important to share our understandings of the industry with the
public and policymakers, Tillerson said. He noted, for example, that
Exxon Mobil's huge oil project that has just begun off Sakhalin Island
on the Pacific side of Russia is tapping reserves first discovered in
the 1970s and only developed in the last decade.

For all the talk of alternative and renewable energies, Tillerson
said, it must be acknowledged that fossil fuels are likely to provide
the bulk of the worldwide demand for oil, expected to rise by 40
percent through the year 2030.


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread mrgmhale
 Far superior to the alternatives, in practice, I've
 found. UltraVNC is more likely to crash my host computer and performs
 poorly over slow links

Check out LogMeIn.com, with their free version.  I finally let guilt get the
best of me and licesned 5 Pro versions, but I still have almost 30 PCs
running the free version on my account.  And, for the record, as slick as
LogMeIn is, I still far prefer pcAnyWhere over Remote Desktop, VNC and even
LogMeIn (which I like a lot).  I do not use any of these over dialup, but I
do have some machinery behind slow DSL or fractional T1 connections.

Gil

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Derek Kalweit
 Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 1:28 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be


  I was thinking that when I wrote this comment, but it's hard for me to
  think of any specific reasons XP is better than W2K... Only a few
  ideas come to mind:
 
   o new 'look and feel'/themes
   o Easy Alternate IP configuration for NIC's(useful for laptops)
   o ClearType fonts
   o Better handling of multiple monitors
   o Able to run IE7(Microsoft's attempt at forcing late adopters
 from W2K to XP)
 
  Quite a lackluster list, honestly... It makes me wonder why I have XP
  installed at home and want it here at work...

 Ah-- just remembered the #1 reason to go to WINXP Pro from W2K Pro--
 Remote Desktop. Far superior to the alternatives, in practice, I've
 found. UltraVNC is more likely to crash my host computer and performs
 poorly over slow links


 --
 Derek


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread Richard Kaye
I've been using LogMeIn for a while now with both free and Pro accounts 
in addition to TS, VNC and pcAW. If you need remote printing and file 
transfer, you need the Pro license. Highly recommended although I do 
prefer pcAW for it's file transfer. Except when it gives me agita...

mrgmhale wrote:
 Far superior to the alternatives, in practice, I've
 found. UltraVNC is more likely to crash my host computer and performs
 poorly over slow links
 

 Check out LogMeIn.com, with their free version.  I finally let guilt get the
 best of me and licesned 5 Pro versions, but I still have almost 30 PCs
 running the free version on my account.  And, for the record, as slick as
 LogMeIn is, I still far prefer pcAnyWhere over Remote Desktop, VNC and even
 LogMeIn (which I like a lot).  I do not use any of these over dialup, but I
 do have some machinery behind slow DSL or fractional T1 connections.

 Gil

   

-- 
Richard Kaye
Vice President
Artfact/RFC Systems
Voice: 617.219.1038
Fax:  617.219.1001

For the fastest response time, please send your support
queries to:

Technical Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Australian Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All Other Requests - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
This message has been checked for viruses before sending.
-



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread kam
I agree with all except the multiple monitors, I have multiple monitors on
Win2K - no problem. If you have trouble, it is probably due to the driver.
You may be able to get an upgrade.

Maybe we need a list of reasons for not upgrading:
1. don't have to worry about being forced to load IE7 with all the problems
it causes.
2. activation - no need to call and be put on hold for 30 minutes when you
upgrade your hard drive (stupid!!)
3. No need to hassle with sharing since it works in Win2K as it should
and XP never did work.
4. No need to go through the new 'look and feel/themes'

Win2K was the last OS from Microsoft that worked pretty well.

As far as the remote desktop - there are many alternatives available that
work great.

I'll bet MS could increase their income by eliminating the activation crap
and all the people who take those phone calls. Probably millions per year.
I'll bet it costs them more than it produces. All they would have to do is
imprint a name with each serial number and not allow it to be changed.
Everytime it is installed, that same name would have to be entered. It could
all be automated and would save them millions. That way you could upgrade
your hard drive without the phone call. A stolen copy would have a certain
name/serial number and could be easily blocked automatically. I have been
using that with my software since 1982 and I have no trouble with pirated
copies. I freely distribute trial versions. When they register, I check some
things to ensure it is valid and give them a serial number cannot be used by
anyone else without that same name appearing on the screen every time it
comes up. If I am told about a pirated copy (1 time in all those years), it
is easy to determine who distributed it. Most shareware that I have works
that way. No need for activation. I guess that is too simple. MS would
rather hassle all their clients - or maybe they are getting bad advice from
someone who is making a lot of money from the activation nonsense.


On 2/14/07, Derek Kalweit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
   o new 'look and feel'/themes
   o Easy Alternate IP configuration for NIC's(useful for laptops)
   o ClearType fonts
   o Better handling of multiple monitors
   o Able to run IE7(Microsoft's attempt at forcing late adopters from W2K
 to XP)
 
 Ah-- just remembered the #1 reason to go to WINXP Pro from W2K Pro--
 Remote Desktop.




--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] I've HAD IT WITH QUICKEN

2007-02-14 Thread MB Software Solutions
Steve Ellenoff wrote:
 snipped
 I was and am still outraged at this tactic, so I decided instead of 
 knuckling under, I would abandon them all together.

 So I did, but now I'm looking for a replacement, and I'm unsure what 
 to go with ( I've heard some horror stories about MS Money )..
   

Have you considered PeachTree?  I haven't used it, but wondered about it 
myself...

-- 
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Software firm plans to move to Lansing

2007-02-14 Thread MB Software Solutions
Ed Leafe wrote:
 On Feb 14, 2007, at 10:47 AM, MB Software Solutions wrote:

   
 http://www.lsj.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070214/ 
 NEWS03/702140354/1004/news
 

   Wait: they're moving from Okemos to Lansing? How is this  
 significant? That's only a couple of miles away.
   

The article, from a MI publication, is basically saying they stayed in 
MI (as opposed to moving out of state).  That's my take on it anyway.  
I posted this article because they apparently are the company who 
produced the Camtasia Studio that you used to produce your demos, iirc.

-- 
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread Derek Kalweit
  Far superior to the alternatives, in practice, I've
  found. UltraVNC is more likely to crash my host computer and performs
  poorly over slow links

 Check out LogMeIn.com, with their free version.  I finally let guilt get the
 best of me and licesned 5 Pro versions, but I still have almost 30 PCs
 running the free version on my account.  And, for the record, as slick as
 LogMeIn is, I still far prefer pcAnyWhere over Remote Desktop, VNC and even
 LogMeIn (which I like a lot).  I do not use any of these over dialup, but I
 do have some machinery behind slow DSL or fractional T1 connections.

PC Anywhere? Don't get me started on how many machines their versions
crash or simply quirks and PITA's with that... We ship it here
standard for our customer's systems, so have 100's of installs that we
dial into... Certain versions will completely ruin a W2K install, for
one... Total crap.


-- 
Derek


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


[OT] Beretta and Toyota Prius

2007-02-14 Thread Leland F. Jackson, CPA
The Beretta Man was not impressed with the Toyota Prisu. LOL

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOvp69lnZbANR 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOvp69lnZbANR

Regards,

LelandJ


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread MB Software Solutions
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 So, there's our first look at Vista. It does benefit from a lot of good
 ideas, many of them Apple's, of course, but good nevertheless. It simply
 doesn't work very well, unfortunately. There are serious problems with
 execution; it's not polished; it's not ready. It should not be on the
 market, and certainly not for the outrageous prices being charged. Don't
 buy it, at least until after the first service pack is out. Don't pay to
 be a beta tester. ®

 http://www.theregister.com/2007/02/14/pricey_beta_bugger/

   

Was channel surfing and saw the Home Shopping channel demoing it on a 
new Gateway computer (who takes pride in claiming that their support 
remains US-based, iirc).  The hosts were cycling through the active 
windows (like a rolodex).  I wasn't impressed.  (BFD--what does *that* 
do for me?!?!?!??)

-- 
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread Bill Arnold

 Ah-- just remembered the #1 reason to go to WINXP Pro from 
 W2K Pro-- Remote Desktop. Far superior to the alternatives, 
 in practice, I've found. UltraVNC is more likely to crash my 
 host computer and performs poorly over slow links


FWIW, I'm using UltraVNC just about daily, including it's file transfer
and chat, for at least a month now. I love it - and especially so
because I have no expection they are going to change policy and start
charging for it.

Tried Remote Desktop but couldn't get it to work through a
modem-router-router setup, which led me to LogMeIn's free offer, which
I really liked (who wouldn't s), but was burned when they changed it,
so decided to switch to something else that was free and would stay that
way.


Bill




 Derek



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread MB Software Solutions
mrgmhale wrote:
 snipped
 Now, if M$ were to do as the Blu-Ray (and in decades past VHS vs BetaMax) 
 folks are supposedly doing, and
 try to edge into the benefits of Vista to the porn industry 

What advantage would the porn industry have with Vista???!?

-- 
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread MB Software Solutions
Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote:
 Oh, in the Register article Stephen Russell sent to us (see below), did
 y'all catch the deal where FireFox can't be made the default browser?  Very
 clever.  M$ allows other browsers to be used (maybe g), but only IE7 can
 be the default?  Talk about slicing hairs...  Technically compliant with the
 
   DOJ ruling, but virtually neutering FireFox, Opera, etc. from getting

 How is that compliant?

 I'd raise holy hell about that one.

 Whil
   

Ditto...that sounds like something no judge could look the other way 
oneven the Bushies cronies!  lol...

-- 
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread Kevin Ragsdale
For what it's worth, you *can* make FireFox the default browser in Vista.

Back in the day, I bought my first Pentium computer (60 Mhz, with 32MB of
RAM and a 10GB hard drive --- I thought I'd never need to buy a new computer
again). It had Windows 95 preinstalled on it. After using it for two days, I
formatted the hard drive and installed Windows 3.1. Because it was better?
No. I went back to 3.11 because Windows 95 was too different for me. I knew
3.11, inside and out. Windows 95 slowed me down, so I went back to the OS I
knew better. It was also a bit sluggish. Windows 3.11 was blazingly fast on
the new Pentium.

Eventually I did make the move to Windows 95, and once I got used to it I
thought it was the best thing since sliced bread --- until Windows 98 came
out. Windows ME? Thank God I missed that train wreck. Windows 2000 was a bit
too different for me, but eventually I got used to it as well.

Windows XP was the most God-awful thing I'd ever seen the first time I tried
it, but it too has grown on me.

I installed Vista Business as my primary OS two weeks ago today. The Aero is
pretty. The best description I've seen is it's less 'cartoonish' than
Windows XP. I've got a decent machine, but it feels sluggish. I tried
unzipping a 10MB file, and the progress meter said it would take 29 minutes.
I canceled the extraction after 10 minutes. Copying files is remarkably slow
as well.

Vista, to me, is different. But it's not the radically different experience
that Win95 and WinXP were for me. But it is s-l-o-w. Dog-ass slow for a new
operating system on a relatively new laptop. It was definitely *not* ready
for prime time, and I do feel that early adopters are simply beta testing
the OS.

So, tonight I'll be redoing the whole thing, back to WinXP Pro as my primary
OS and running Vista in VPC2007. I do have a need to test apps on Vista,
because sooner or later one of my clients is going to upgrade/buy a new
computer, and I'd prefer to 'fix' my Vista-related issues now instead of
having the client report the issues to me.

I like the 'WOW' factor with some of the graphical changes, but they wear
thin rather quickly. Ultimately, my decision to stick with XP is simple: I
am more productive with XP/2000/98 than I can be with Vista. Maybe after a
service pack or two I'll be ready to try it again.

And don't even get me started on the whole DRM thing... :)





___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread Derek Kalweit
 I agree with all except the multiple monitors, I have multiple monitors on
 Win2K - no problem. If you have trouble, it is probably due to the driver.
 You may be able to get an upgrade.

I haven't tried multiple monitors on W2K, so it's probably better now,
yes. I tried to load a 3rd monitor the other day on WXP and had some
problems... I think that was driver-related, though...


 Maybe we need a list of reasons for not upgrading:

That's the easy list to make. #1 would be 'don't fix what ain't
broke', but if we did that, innovation of all sorts would stop.


 1. don't have to worry about being forced to load IE7 with all the problems
 it causes.

If you disable the auto-update crap, you can get away with not loading
IE7. I unloaded it the first time it installed when it caused
problems, but I loaded it when I recently re-installed a month or two
ago and haven't had problems since-- I just had to get an update for
Ultra Edit, as their installer was to blame for it not working
properly, I guess...


 2. activation - no need to call and be put on hold for 30 minutes when you
 upgrade your hard drive (stupid!!)

Amen. Make that reason #1.


 3. No need to hassle with sharing since it works in Win2K as it should
 and XP never did work.

Did you turn off 'simple file sharing'? Simple, my ass. It makes
things just not seem to work-- at least for anyone who knows how to
share-- maybe those people who have never shared a folder can figure
it out...


 4. No need to go through the new 'look and feel/themes'

I kinda like it. The updated fonts, clear type, 'hot' buttons, etc.,
all make the O/S just feel better to me. More a familiarity thing, I'm
sure...


 Win2K was the last OS from Microsoft that worked pretty well.

My stance until a year or 2 ago when I finally installed Windows XP on
my main machine at home.


 As far as the remote desktop - there are many alternatives available that
 work great.

Not usually as well nor as stable. Definitely not with the same LAN
remote-control experience. Using RDP fullscreen over a LAN, you don't
even realize you're RDP'd into another machine unless you try to run a
video and notice it's a bit sluggish. All the window updates are
almost as good as if you were, sound plays locally, colors are high,
no screen anamolies, etc...


 I'll bet MS could increase their income by eliminating the activation crap
 and all the people who take those phone calls. Probably millions per year.
 I'll bet it costs them more than it produces. All they would have to do is
 imprint a name with each serial number and not allow it to be changed.

Yep. They were making plenty of money and getting lots of people to
upgrade up from Windows 3.1 to W2K, but then a huge segment of people
stopped at W2K. They know this, hence their stopping support for W2K,
limiting IE7 to WXP+, etc.


 Everytime it is installed, that same name would have to be entered. It could
 all be automated and would save them millions. That way you could upgrade
 your hard drive without the phone call. A stolen copy would have a certain
 name/serial number and could be easily blocked automatically. I have been
 using that with my software since 1982 and I have no trouble with pirated
 copies. I freely distribute trial versions. When they register, I check some
 things to ensure it is valid and give them a serial number cannot be used by
 anyone else without that same name appearing on the screen every time it
 comes up. If I am told about a pirated copy (1 time in all those years), it
 is easy to determine who distributed it. Most shareware that I have works
 that way. No need for activation. I guess that is too simple. MS would
 rather hassle all their clients - or maybe they are getting bad advice from
 someone who is making a lot of money from the activation nonsense.

Retail software is sold in such a way you don't have customer
information usually...


-- 
Derek


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread Derek Kalweit
  Ah-- just remembered the #1 reason to go to WINXP Pro from
  W2K Pro-- Remote Desktop. Far superior to the alternatives,
  in practice, I've found. UltraVNC is more likely to crash my
  host computer and performs poorly over slow links

 FWIW, I'm using UltraVNC just about daily, including it's file transfer
 and chat, for at least a month now. I love it - and especially so
 because I have no expection they are going to change policy and start
 charging for it.

I use UltraVNC daily. It crashes my one machine sometimes, and the
others the screen sometimes doesn't update, etc. Usable, and my
alternative on W2K, but I still don't like it that much..


 Tried Remote Desktop but couldn't get it to work through a
 modem-router-router setup, which led me to LogMeIn's free offer, which
 I really liked (who wouldn't s), but was burned when they changed it,
 so decided to switch to something else that was free and would stay that
 way.

I refuse to pay extra for something that should be part of the O/S to
begin with.

Forwarding port 3389 always works for me, btw.


-- 
Derek


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: Recommended Icon/Graphics Libraries Free or Commercial

2007-02-14 Thread MB Software Solutions
Jack Skelley wrote:
 Steve:
 I have collected over the years some 2400+ icons.
 I have them in a zipped folder and will email it to you if you wish.
   

Jack -- put them on the ProFox downloads page!  http://leafe.com/dls

-- 
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread mrgmhale
 How is that compliant?

 I'd raise holy hell about that one.


Seems to me DOJ required M$ to separate IE from the core OS, which M$ said
could not be done without causing serious problems, rendering Windows
inoperable.  Along the way DOJ paved the way to require M$ to not prohibit
competitive browsers from running under Windows.  But I do not recall
anything that required M$ to allow other browsers to run as default apps
when a user wanted to have a browser come up.  My gut tells me M$ allowed
that for a while to keep the heat off, and now that some time has passed is
making a play for default IE7, likely under the it is too tightly tied to
the Windows OS to separate it claim - yet allowing other browsers to run
(maybe properly if they comply with M$'s security policies g).  Hmmm, I
thought this was a new OS from the ground, devoid of DOS (like XP  2000,
eh?), yet the browser seems awfully tied to the OS again...  I smell a long
dead fish around here.

Thoughts?  Clarifications?  Corrections?  Am I being paranoid?


Gil

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Whil Hentzen (Pro*)
 Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 2:05 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be


  Oh, in the Register article Stephen Russell sent to us (see below), did
  y'all catch the deal where FireFox can't be made the default
 browser?  Very
  clever.  M$ allows other browsers to be used (maybe g), but
 only IE7 can
  be the default?  Talk about slicing hairs...  Technically
 compliant with the
   DOJ ruling, but virtually neutering FireFox, Opera, etc. from getting

 How is that compliant?

 I'd raise holy hell about that one.

 Whil



[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread Bill Arnold
  FWIW, I'm using UltraVNC just about daily, including it's file 
  transfer and chat, for at least a month now. I love it - and 
  especially so because I have no expection they are going to change 
  policy and start charging for it.
 
 I use UltraVNC daily. It crashes my one machine sometimes, 
 and the others the screen sometimes doesn't update, etc. 
 Usable, and my alternative on W2K, but I still don't like it 
 that much..


Guess I've been lucky so far, with these particular machines (with
XP/Pro on both ends), and should take this as a heads-up there can be
trouble down the road. Well, will have to take it a machine at a time,
and maybe try Remote Desktop again (with a simpler cable
modem-router-PC setup) when/if I do run into trouble with UltraVNC on
some other machine.

 
  Tried Remote Desktop but couldn't get it to work through a
  modem-router-router setup, which led me to LogMeIn's free offer, 
  modem-router-which
  I really liked (who wouldn't s), but was burned when they changed 
  it, so decided to switch to something else that was free and would 
  stay that way.
 
 I refuse to pay extra for something that should be part of 
 the O/S to begin with.


That's what I meant s.

It's the recurring monthly bills that get me going to great lengths to
avoid. 


 
 Forwarding port 3389 always works for me, btw.


Sounds like a good thing to know, so will make a note of this port in my
doc. Without checking, I think I'm setup with 5800 or 5900, whichever is
the default.
 

Bill



 Derek
 
 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread mrgmhale

 What advantage would the porn industry have with Vista???!?


Uhhh,, h, sharper images?  More detail with all that extra video RAM?  A
slicker experience for their viewers?  I was kind of spoofing anyway, tongue
in cheek with that crack.  But, I bet if M$ could find some way to horn in
there quietly to drive Vista they would whore themsleves to do so G...

Gil

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of MB Software Solutions
 Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 2:46 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be


 mrgmhale wrote:
  snipped
  Now, if M$ were to do as the Blu-Ray (and in decades past VHS
 vs BetaMax) folks are supposedly doing, and
  try to edge into the benefits of Vista to the porn industry

 What advantage would the porn industry have with Vista???!?

 --
 Michael J. Babcock, MCP
 MB Software Solutions, LLC
 http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
 http://fabmate.com
 Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!



[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread mrgmhale
 For what it's worth, you *can* make FireFox the default browser in Vista.

Glad to hear it.  The author of the article I cited was then incorrect, and
I had already qualified that I have not used it myself - therefore was
relying on what seemed to be accurate info (but even that author was careful
to position himself as not knowing all about Vista as well).  Shame, it is
one less thing to bitch about.  But there are plenty of other things I think
g...

Gil

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kevin Ragsdale
 Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 2:48 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be


 For what it's worth, you *can* make FireFox the default browser in Vista.

 Back in the day, I bought my first Pentium computer (60 Mhz, with 32MB of
 RAM and a 10GB hard drive --- I thought I'd never need to buy a
 new computer
 again). It had Windows 95 preinstalled on it. After using it for
 two days, I
 formatted the hard drive and installed Windows 3.1. Because it was better?
 No. I went back to 3.11 because Windows 95 was too different for
 me. I knew
 3.11, inside and out. Windows 95 slowed me down, so I went back
 to the OS I
 knew better. It was also a bit sluggish. Windows 3.11 was
 blazingly fast on
 the new Pentium.

 Eventually I did make the move to Windows 95, and once I got used to it I
 thought it was the best thing since sliced bread --- until Windows 98 came
 out. Windows ME? Thank God I missed that train wreck. Windows
 2000 was a bit
 too different for me, but eventually I got used to it as well.

 Windows XP was the most God-awful thing I'd ever seen the first
 time I tried
 it, but it too has grown on me.

 I installed Vista Business as my primary OS two weeks ago today.
 The Aero is
 pretty. The best description I've seen is it's less 'cartoonish' than
 Windows XP. I've got a decent machine, but it feels sluggish. I tried
 unzipping a 10MB file, and the progress meter said it would take
 29 minutes.
 I canceled the extraction after 10 minutes. Copying files is
 remarkably slow
 as well.

 Vista, to me, is different. But it's not the radically different
 experience
 that Win95 and WinXP were for me. But it is s-l-o-w. Dog-ass slow
 for a new
 operating system on a relatively new laptop. It was definitely *not* ready
 for prime time, and I do feel that early adopters are simply beta testing
 the OS.

 So, tonight I'll be redoing the whole thing, back to WinXP Pro as
 my primary
 OS and running Vista in VPC2007. I do have a need to test apps on Vista,
 because sooner or later one of my clients is going to upgrade/buy a new
 computer, and I'd prefer to 'fix' my Vista-related issues now instead of
 having the client report the issues to me.

 I like the 'WOW' factor with some of the graphical changes, but they wear
 thin rather quickly. Ultimately, my decision to stick with XP is simple: I
 am more productive with XP/2000/98 than I can be with Vista. Maybe after a
 service pack or two I'll be ready to try it again.

 And don't even get me started on the whole DRM thing... :)





[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


re: [SQL2K] Replication to Foxpro

2007-02-14 Thread William Sanders / EFG
Point by point, but not in the original order as presented:

1.  The problem is that they have screens that pull back all the data from
 certain key tables that are pretty large.
ALL the data? so the sql query code looks like:
select * from tablename.
Always bad form , imo/ime, in any client/server environment.  Even if it's
a KEY table, it sounds like there needs to be some other normalization of
the data, or at least shift off to doing a parameterized query that
includes a 'where' clause, and the item in the where clause is a hit on a
column that is indexed.

2.  but they say when they had the FoxPro database, the app would simply
open a pipe to the data and they could bring back the first screen full of
data in a couple of seconds, and then  Foxpor [sic]would leave the pipe
open so it could smootly scroll forward/backward  throught the results
without having to issue another data request.
Yup - thats the beauty of the speed of data access with native vfp tables.
Doesn't exist in SQL SERVER, sorry.

3.  Therefore, the application is not built with any form of paging 
capability
Ah - but it could be!  With the same remote views into sql server, you can
set up the connection properties from vfp to not pull everything, and
limit each pull to 100 to 200 records.  Then, as the pseudo-cursor is
moved (ie- go bottom) , VFP will force the odbc connection to get to the
end. There is a time lag, of course, but NOT for the initial VFP
form/screen load.

4.  The proplem [sic] they've run into now that SQL Server is the
database is that in  order to simulate the scrolling capability of the
FoxPro based tables, the middle layer has to pull all the data into a
cache area first.
OK - so now comes 'the rub' right ? This is where the design change comes
into play.

Going forward.

The set of tables that need to be 'replicated' - How often does this
information change ? How is each record uniquely identified? Have you done
any matching with primary ID's in the SQL table with primary ID's in the
VFP table?

IFIW - I'd take a 3 shot approach to your 'replication' process, could be
done in stored procedure, then migrated over to something else.

1.  from sql server to VFP table via oledb
 - get a sql cursor (call it diff_a) of the primary id's in the vfp table
2. in sql server
 - do a diff on the diff_a cursor with the sql table you wish to push out,
getting only the primary id's, creating a new sql cursor (again storing
only the primary id's), call it diff_b
 - create a sql cursor with everything in it that matches the primary id's
stored in diff_b
3.  from sql server to vfp table via oledb
 - simply append to the vfp table, the contents of the diff_b sql cursor.

This will negate the error you run across with the vfpoledb driver having
the parameterized problem.

Good Luck !
Mondo Regards [Bill]

-- 
William Sanders / efGroup {rmv the DOT BOB to reply}
VFP Webhosting? You BET! - http://efgroup.net/vfpwebhosting
Failing dotNet Project? - http://www.dotnetconversions.com



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread Derek Kalweit
 trouble down the road. Well, will have to take it a machine at a time,
 and maybe try Remote Desktop again (with a simpler cable
 modem-router-PC setup) when/if I do run into trouble with UltraVNC on
 some other machine.

A modem-router-router-PC setup should work as long as the outside
router points at the inside router's wan IP and that inside router
points to the inside PC... Why would you have two routers hooked up
like that?


  I refuse to pay extra for something that should be part of
  the O/S to begin with.

 That's what I meant s.

 It's the recurring monthly bills that get me going to great lengths to
 avoid.

Yep. I don't care for 'subscription' model anything, and avoid it
whenever possible.


  Forwarding port 3389 always works for me, btw.

 Sounds like a good thing to know, so will make a note of this port in my
 doc. Without checking, I think I'm setup with 5800 or 5900, whichever is
 the default.

5900 is the default for VNC.


-- 
Derek


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread Derek Kalweit
 Not knowing your environment, version of PCA, etc., I can't say why you are
 having such issues.  I am running versions on some client PCs as hosts as
 far back as v-8.0, most are now 10.5-12.5.  Yet all work fine with my VPN
 connections on several of my PCs.  I am running v-10 - v-12.5 on my various
 machines.  I never have a problem.  If I recall for Win2k you must have
 v-10.0 or later.  For XP I think it is v-10.5 0r 11.0 or later.  But I am
 certain you already know this, therefore the problems lay elsewhere...

I'm a developer with supports guys. I had to install PCA once, and I
guess I installed a version on W2K that made it crash-- no message
saying it was incompatible, etc.-- just breakage... Not at all
acceptable, IMO.


 That said, I know that PayChex Windows version craps out if pcAnywhere
 v-10.5 or earlier is installed and in Host Mode on a PC running PayChex.  I
 am not certain who between them is causing the problem.  But by simply
 moving that client to v-10.0 to v-12.0 the problem went away with both
 pcAnywhere and PayChex.  Conflicts happen.  It is a shame it is impacting
 you so badly.  A viable alternative is likely a good move, but that does not
 make pcAnywhere a poor product.

It doesn't personally impact me that badly, as I avoid the crap. :)
There's just no need for it when free, better alternatives exist...


-- 
Derek


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


re: [SQL2K] Replication to Foxpro

2007-02-14 Thread Mike yearwood
Hi Bill


 From: William Sanders / EFG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: re: [SQL2K] Replication to Foxpro
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

 Point by point, but not in the original order as presented:

 3.  Therefore, the application is not built with any form of paging
 capability
 Ah - but it could be!  With the same remote views into sql server, you can
 set up the connection properties from vfp to not pull everything, and
 limit each pull to 100 to 200 records.  Then, as the pseudo-cursor is
 moved (ie- go bottom) , VFP will force the odbc connection to get to the
 end. There is a time lag, of course, but NOT for the initial VFP
 form/screen load.


Actually, you can write queries that page through the data without
ever seeing that go bottom delay.

Select fields from table order by whatever top 100 where 1=1

now remember the last PK m.lastPK

then when they click next ...

select fields from table order by whatever top 100 where pkm.lastPK


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread Kevin Ragsdale
 my first Pentium computer (60 Mhz, with 32MB of RAM and a 10GB hard drive

Actually, I think it was an 850MB hard drive. 

A HUGE increase over the computer it replaced (which had a 10MB hard drive).


Ten megabytes --- I thought I'd *never* run out of disk space on that
thing... :)



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread Bill Arnold

  trouble down the road. Well, will have to take it a machine at a
  time,
  and maybe try Remote Desktop again (with a simpler cable
  modem-router-PC setup) when/if I do run into trouble with UltraVNC

  modem-router-on some other machine.
 
 A modem-router-router-PC setup should work as long as the outside 
 router points at the inside router's wan IP and that inside router 
 points to the inside PC... Why would you have two routers hooked up 
 like that?


DSL modem and router 1 were in an attached house with long RJ45 wire to
router 2 in separate apt. Access was a pain, and I don't recall all the
details, but there was some gotcha involved. I am pretty sure that I did
try setting it up as you say, as that's how I generally understand it.
Oh well, simpler cable-router setup now.


Bill



 
 
   I refuse to pay extra for something that should be part
 of the O/S
   to begin with.
 
  That's what I meant s.
 
  It's the recurring monthly bills that get me going to great
 lengths to
  avoid.
 
 Yep. I don't care for 'subscription' model anything, and
 avoid it whenever possible.
 
 
   Forwarding port 3389 always works for me, btw.
 
  Sounds like a good thing to know, so will make a note of
 this port in
  my doc. Without checking, I think I'm setup with 5800 or 5900,
  whichever is the default.
 
 5900 is the default for VNC.
 
 
 --
 Derek



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread MB Software Solutions
mrgmhale wrote:
 snipped
   Hmmm, I thought this was a new OS from the ground, devoid of DOS (like XP  
 2000,
 eh?), yet the browser seems awfully tied to the OS again...  I smell a long
 dead fish around here.

 Thoughts?  Clarifications?  Corrections?  Am I being paranoid?
   
It can't be totally from scratch...it's gotta be old code mixed 
inaccording to what I heard...because to start from scratch would 
take MANY MORE YEARS than they already took, costing much more and 
obviously more bug prone if not tried/true/tested for years.

 
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Index on Deleted()

2007-02-14 Thread John Weller
I have an index on DELETED() in most of my tables.  To check if a table
needs packing I look for a deleted record using this index.  When I look at
a table with no deleted records I'm finding that the line:

LOCATE FOR DELETED()
?FOUND()

returns False, whereas

? SEEK(DELETED(), 'MyTable', 'DelRecs')

is returning True - which is obviously wrong!  This happens on all of the
tables which do not have deleted records.  Any suggestions as to what I am
doing wrong?  (I'm going to change the code to use LOCATE rather than SEEK
as an interim measure).

TIA


John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


[OT] You and I are not in the Big Club

2007-02-14 Thread Helio W.
You and I are not in the Big Club
 by George Carlin (Forward by Mark Faulk)
http://www.faulkingtruth.com/Articles/Investing101/1070.html

(Editor's note: WARNING- This is an R-rated excerpt from George
Carlin's lastest special, Life is worth Losing. It's been airing for
the past few months on HBO. The first time I saw it, and heard this
segment on what I have been calling The Circle of Greed, about how
the ultra-wealthy use Washington and Wall Street to rob America blind,
about how the rich get richer and the rest of us get screwed, my first
thought was if a 69 year-old comedian understands what's going on,
why don't those in charge get it? And then I realized: they do get
it...and that's exactly the problem. But as Carlin says in a trailer
for this special, which was taped in 2005, you can't shut me up, and
you can't dumb me down. Enjoy.)

There's a reason that education sucks, and it's the same reason it
will never ever ever be fixed. It's never going to get any better,
don't look for it. Be happy with what you've got. Because the owners
of this country don't want that. I'm talking about the real owners
now, the big, wealthy, business interests that control all things and
make the big decisions.

Forget the politicians, they're irrelevant.

Politicians are put there to give you that idea that you have
freedom of choice. You don't. You have no choice. You have owners.
They own you. They own everything. They own all the important land,
they own and control the corporations, and they've long since bought
and paid for the Senate, the Congress, the State Houses, and the City
Halls. They've got the judges in their back pockets. And they own all
the big media companies so they control just about all the news and
information you get to hear.

They've got you by the balls.

They spend billions of dollars every year lobbying to get what
they want. Well, we know what they want; they want more for themselves
and less for everybody else. But I'll tell you what they don't
want—they don't want a population of citizens capable of critical
thinking. They don't want well informed, well educated people capable
of critical thinking. They're not interested in that. That doesn't
help them. That's against their interest. You know something, they
don't want people that are smart enough to sit around their kitchen
table and figure out how badly they're getting fucked by a system that
threw them overboard 30 fucking years ago.

They don't want that, you know what they want?

They want obedient workers, obedient workers. People who are just
smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork and just dumb
enough to passively accept all these increasingly shittier jobs with
the lower pay, the longer hours, the reduced benefits, the end of
overtime and the vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go
to collect it.

And now they're coming for your social security money.

They want your fucking retirement money; they want it back so they
can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street. And you know
something? They'll get it. They'll get it all from you sooner or later
because they own this fucking place. It's a big club and you ain't in
it! You and I are not in the Big Club. By the way, it's the same big
club they use to beat you in the head with all day long when they tell
you what to believe. All day long beating you over the head with their
media telling you what to believe, what to believe, what to think and
what to buy.

The table is tilted folks, the game is rigged.

Nobody seems to notice, nobody seems to care. Good honest hard
working people, white collar, blue collar, it doesn't matter what
color shirt you have on. Good honest hard working people continue,
these are people of modest means, continue to elect these rich
cocksuckers who don't give a fuck about them. They don't give a fuck
about you. They don't give a fuck about…give a fuck about you! They
don't care about you at all, at all, at all.

And nobody seems to notice, nobody seems to care.

That's what the owners count on, the fact that Americans are and
will probably remain willfully ignorant of the big red, white, and
blue dick that's being jammed up their assholes everyday. Because the
owners of this country know the truth, it's called the American Dream,
because you have to be asleep to believe it.


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: Index on Deleted()

2007-02-14 Thread Ted Roche
On 2/14/07, John Weller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 ? SEEK(DELETED(), 'MyTable', 'DelRecs')

 is returning True - which is obviously wrong!

Isn't the first argument the value you are supposed to be looking for?
If so, it should be .T. shouldn't it?

With your argument, it's evaluating DELETED() for the current record,
likely .F., and then finding that in the table.


-- 
Ted Roche
Ted Roche  Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: Index on Deleted()

2007-02-14 Thread Vince Teachout
John Weller wrote:
 I have an index on DELETED() in most of my tables.  To check if a table
 needs packing I look for a deleted record using this index.  When I look at
 a table with no deleted records I'm finding that the line:

 LOCATE FOR DELETED()
 ?FOUND()

 returns False, whereas

 ? SEEK(DELETED(), 'MyTable', 'DelRecs')

 is returning True - which is obviously wrong!  This happens on all of the
 tables which do not have deleted records.  Any suggestions as to what I am
 doing wrong?  (I'm going to change the code to use LOCATE rather than SEEK
 as an interim measure).
   
I'm going to hem and haw my way carefully through this, so I don't look 
much more ignorant then most people already think I am.
I can't answer the question, but maybe this will get someone a bit 
closer to it.

IIRC, Deleted() returns a .T. for the current record.  Since you have no 
deleted records, you are doing a Seek(.F.)

With an index on Deleted():
with all records non-deleted, if you literally do a Seek(.F.), it always 
returns .T., and a Seek .T. always returns .F.
with all records deleted, if you literally do a Seek(.F.), it always 
returns .F., and a Seek .T. always returns .T.
With a mix, both always return .T.

If you reverse your index, though ( Index on !Deleted() etc ), 
everything works exactly as you would expect, including  your 
Seek(Deleted())

I dunno.


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread mrgmhale
 I'm a developer with supports guys. I had to install PCA once, and I
 guess I installed a version on W2K that made it crash-- no message
 saying it was incompatible, etc.-- just breakage... Not at all
 acceptable, IMO.


I learned the hard way with a Win2k Pro machine as well, tried to install
9.5 I think.  No warning, crash/trash.  I went into Safe Mode, uninstalled
and picked up v-10.0.  I installed fine, I ducked a major bullet.

Re: free alternatives, agreed that if they exist and work well, use them.
LogMeIn.com has been awesome.  I use my ftp Server for file transfers.  For
the few Pro licenses I have I have not yet used their file transfer
solution.


Gil


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Derek Kalweit
 Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 3:34 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be


  Not knowing your environment, version of PCA, etc., I can't say
 why you are
  having such issues.  I am running versions on some client PCs
 as hosts as
  far back as v-8.0, most are now 10.5-12.5.  Yet all work fine
 with my VPN
  connections on several of my PCs.  I am running v-10 - v-12.5
 on my various
  machines.  I never have a problem.  If I recall for Win2k you must have
  v-10.0 or later.  For XP I think it is v-10.5 0r 11.0 or later.
  But I am
  certain you already know this, therefore the problems lay elsewhere...

 I'm a developer with supports guys. I had to install PCA once, and I
 guess I installed a version on W2K that made it crash-- no message
 saying it was incompatible, etc.-- just breakage... Not at all
 acceptable, IMO.


  That said, I know that PayChex Windows version craps out if pcAnywhere
  v-10.5 or earlier is installed and in Host Mode on a PC running
 PayChex.  I
  am not certain who between them is causing the problem.  But by simply
  moving that client to v-10.0 to v-12.0 the problem went away with both
  pcAnywhere and PayChex.  Conflicts happen.  It is a shame it is
 impacting
  you so badly.  A viable alternative is likely a good move, but
 that does not
  make pcAnywhere a poor product.

 It doesn't personally impact me that badly, as I avoid the crap. :)
 There's just no need for it when free, better alternatives exist...


 --
 Derek


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


M$ Vista Speech Recognition and Programming

2007-02-14 Thread Kevin Cully
Gil!  You'll have to wait for the voice recognition built into Vista!

http://youtube.com/watch?v=KyLqUf4cdwc

(Yes, this seems like a hatched job.  They probably have a terrible
microphone but I was laughing my evil laugh anyway.)



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [OT] Republicans and Reality

2007-02-14 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
Pete Theisen wrote:
 On Wednesday 14 February 2007 1:02 am, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
 snip
 Yeah, you and your lefty friends, bring it on. Wouldn't even make
 landfall before the Navy/CoastGuard blew you out of the water or Air
 Force blew you out of the sky. If you by some miracle did get here you
 had better hide from Joe Redneck who will patriotically empty his (legal)
 gun into your bellies
 Naaahhh, you would never fight if the size of the guns are the same. How
 about knives? I like knives, they are so more personal.
 
 Hi Ricardo!
 
 It's not a gentlemen's duel, for those who would invade the US are not 
 gentlemen. If you invade the US you get shot.

According to you pretty soon your population will be very old (they are
killing the babies!) and full of homosexuals and drug addicts. There'll
be no one to shoot us (you'll be too busy mourning for boyfriend Mike
who'll have died when a bottle broke up his ).

 --
 Regards,
 
 Pete
 http://www.pete-theisen.com/
 
 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: I just got 3 photocopies of a 1099 from a client. That's notlegal, is it?

2007-02-14 Thread ken.com
I use quickbooks. They have a function to print the 1099. I have been printing 
on plain paper for years, no problem at all. Forget 
those forms.


- Original Message - 
From: Kristyne McDaniel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 7:28 AM
Subject: RE: I just got 3 photocopies of a 1099 from a client. That's notlegal, 
is it?


Madigan,

 That's not legal,is it?

 This guy sent me 3 photocopies of 1099s.

 Don't I have to provide originals to the IRS?

At least he sent you something. Selling 1099 forms is a profit center for
accounting software companies this time of year -- they're kinda expensive.
He's probably just trying to save a buck by making photocopies.

Kristyne McDaniel
http://www.mcstyles.com
http://www.shamrocktrails.com




[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: I just got 3 photocopies of a 1099 from a client. That's notlegal, is it?

2007-02-14 Thread Whil Hentzen (Pro*)
ken.com wrote:
 I use quickbooks. They have a function to print the 1099. I have been 
 printing on plain paper for years, no problem at all. Forget 
 those forms.

OK, I'll bite.

I just navigated to 'ken.com', and well, I sure was surprised not to see 
  the McGinnis software empire show up. s

Whil


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [OT] Republicans and Reality

2007-02-14 Thread Pete Theisen
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 4:05 am, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
 Pete Theisen wrote:
  On Wednesday 14 February 2007 1:02 am, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
  snip
 
  Yeah, you and your lefty friends, bring it on. Wouldn't even make
  landfall before the Navy/CoastGuard blew you out of the water or Air
  Force blew you out of the sky. If you by some miracle did get here you
  had better hide from Joe Redneck who will patriotically empty his
  (legal) gun into your bellies
 
  Naaahhh, you would never fight if the size of the guns are the same. How
  about knives? I like knives, they are so more personal.
 
  Hi Ricardo!
 
  It's not a gentlemen's duel, for those who would invade the US are not
  gentlemen. If you invade the US you get shot.

 According to you pretty soon your population will be very old (they are
 killing the babies!) and full of homosexuals and drug addicts. There'll
 be no one to shoot us

Hi Ricardo!

I know a few people who are still able to shoot. It is informative, however, 
to understand your agenda.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Software firm plans to move to Lansing

2007-02-14 Thread Ed Leafe
On Feb 14, 2007, at 2:38 PM, MB Software Solutions wrote:

 The article, from a MI publication, is basically saying they  
 stayed in
 MI (as opposed to moving out of state).  That's my take on it anyway.

I guess I got thrown by the moved to in the subject, rather than  
stays put.  ;-)

 I posted this article because they apparently are the company who
 produced the Camtasia Studio that you used to produce your demos,  
 iirc.

I don't use Camtasia, though I know lots of people love it. I use  
pyvnc2swf.

-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: M$ Vista Speech Recognition and Programming

2007-02-14 Thread mrgmhale
What a hoot!  I just ordered Dragon Speaking Naturally, latest version,
yesterday.  I was hoping the symptoms would subside, but thus far I have
more bad days than good days.  I can hardly wait to train The Dragon, then
unleash its power onto ProFox!  It ought to be a source of amusement and
laughter for all.

Thanks for the comic relief.  Lynda (wife) was watching and listening, and
got as good a laugh as I did.  Then she realized that is the kind of crap I
am going to have to deal with.  Suddenly it was not so funny, until I
snickered some more and told her everything would be fine.  Not to worry, no
regrets.

Gil

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kevin Cully
 Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 6:03 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: M$ Vista Speech Recognition and Programming


 Gil!  You'll have to wait for the voice recognition built into Vista!

 http://youtube.com/watch?v=KyLqUf4cdwc

 (Yes, this seems like a hatched job.  They probably have a terrible
 microphone but I was laughing my evil laugh anyway.)



[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: I just got 3 photocopies of a 1099 from a client. That'snotlegal, is it?

2007-02-14 Thread Kristyne McDaniel
Ken,

 I use QuickBooks. They have a function to print the 1099. I 
 have been printing on plain paper for years, no problem at 
 all. Forget those forms.

According to the QuickBooks help, the IRS requires the preprinted forms for
1099s. I have no idea why it would be required, but that's what it says.

I am also a QuickBooks user. I've been one for many years.

Kristyne McDaniel
http://www.mcstyles.com
http://www.shamrocktrails.com




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [OT] Republicans and Reality

2007-02-14 Thread Pete Theisen
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 10:04 pm, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
snip
  It's not a gentlemen's duel, for those who would invade the US are not
  gentlemen. If you invade the US you get shot.
 
  According to you pretty soon your population will be very old (they are
  killing the babies!) and full of homosexuals and drug addicts. There'll
  be no one to shoot us
 
  Hi Ricardo!
 
  I know a few people who are still able to shoot. It is informative,
  however, to understand your agenda.

 H... maybe I should polish my English. I had understood that an
 'agenda' was kind of a secret thing, private plans not disclosed to
 everyone. Please enlighten me.

Hi Ricardo!

You are thinking of Hidden Agenda.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: M$ Vista Speech Recognition and Programming

2007-02-14 Thread Kevin Cully
I'm sure this guy didn't Train the system.  With training, I'm sure
that your Dragon will Sit, Roll-over, play dead, and speak on command. g

mrgmhale wrote:
 What a hoot!  I just ordered Dragon Speaking Naturally, latest version,
 yesterday.  I was hoping the symptoms would subside, but thus far I have
 more bad days than good days.  I can hardly wait to train The Dragon, then
 unleash its power onto ProFox!  It ought to be a source of amusement and
 laughter for all.
 
 Thanks for the comic relief.  Lynda (wife) was watching and listening, and
 got as good a laugh as I did.  Then she realized that is the kind of crap I
 am going to have to deal with.  Suddenly it was not so funny, until I
 snickered some more and told her everything would be fine.  Not to worry, no
 regrets.
 
 Gil
 



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


VFP - Vista - Cleartype: problem

2007-02-14 Thread Brian Abbott
Developing on XP I have Cleartype turned off - I think VFP is much more 
readable that way and it doesn't have too much impact on other programs.

Yesterday I started doing some development on Vista for the first time. 
First thing I noticed was that cleartype (which is on by default) seems 
to make VFP even more unreadable than in XP (to the point where after an 
hour of trying it I got a headache).  So I turned cleartype off.  VFP is 
now perfectly readable, but several other programs (notably Thunderbird) 
are really bad - much, much worse than in XP.

I've experimented with the cleartype tuner, different versions of vfp (8 
and 9) and different fonts.  Nothing seems to make much difference.  I'm 
dual booting XP and Vista so the video cards and TFT screens are the 
same.  For the moment at least I'm back to using XP unless I need to 
test something under Vista.

Has anyone else experienced anything similar?

-- 
Cheers


Brian Abbott

ACA Systems



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

2007-02-14 Thread David Smith
I actually like Vista. Here's why:

It's more stable when compared to my experience with XPSP2. I log 60+ hours
a week on the same PC running Vista that used to run XP, and Vista doesn't
crash or hang nearly as often.
The interface is better; that is less cluttered and a little more intuitive
for me to use. 
I really like some of the newer things in Vista ... The automatic backups,
the expanded msconfig, the ability of the OS to 'bounce back' from errors.
Nice. 

Are there things I don't like? Sure. The security nags are a joke. IE7 is
pretty, but not as stable as IE6 or 5.5. There are some lingering driver
issues out there where things work, but not as well as they should. But
overall I think there is a lot of undiscovered power in the OS that will be
tapped and tamed over time. Give it a chance and I think it will pleasantly
surprise you once you peel back the irritations that have been put in place
to protect you from errors the average user would trip over.  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Derek Kalweit
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 12:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be

I'll keep that quote in mind the next time someone says that 
  Linux will never catch on, since things aren't in exactly the same 
  place as what they're used to in Windows.

 That's probably the least of the hurdles facing it on the corporate
desktop!

The #1 reason, obviously being that Linux can't [legally] run Visual Foxpro
applications. :-)


--
Derek


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


  1   2   >