thanks
i took a very quick peek and i think AB Commander has it beat
i will tool around a little more later
Dennis Saputelli
Rusty Garfield wrote:
Hi Dennis
Try this one out. looks like old xtree gold. does ftp, zips files adds and
deletes to zip exe files, double pane and more.
Been
Ian wrote:
The rules are imported from the PCB so are basically OK when you start the
command. I
am surprised that anyone would have too much trouble finding it.
You mention two important things in two emailsThank You.The first
assumes that I can import my rules in Camtastik. Neat
] Need more software
Mike wrote:
[Snip]
We found a way to create virtual components which are used as component
keep outs to fool 99SE into thinking it was 3D. It works both online batch
in 99SE.
[Snip]
Mike Reagan
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post
If you keep consistent design practices geared around 99SE's DRC
capabilities, yes, some things may take a little extra effort, but, you
should be able to maximize out the built in DRC without having to do checks
with additional tools.
However, I'm upset to hear that 2004's DRC might
: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 11:32 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Need more software
Mike,
I'd be really interested in more information on this if you're willing to
share it.
Darcy Davis
Design Engineer,
Dynastream Innovations, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Reagan [mailto
-Original Message-
From: Mike Reagan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 4:56 PM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Need more software
snip
Camtastic is a step in the right direction. Again I don't
like the integration. Specifically, I don't like
-Original Message-
From: John A. Ross [Design] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 12:21 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Need more software
-Original Message-
From: Mike Reagan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 4:56 PM
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 11:32 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Need more software
Mike,
I'd be really interested in more information on this if you're willing to
share it.
Darcy Davis
Design Engineer,
Dynastream Innovations, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Mike
with a tool is
not in the cards.
Joe
- Original Message -
From: Mike Reagan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Protel EDA Forum' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Need more software
John
See, now Ya'll dont read everything I write. No, you can not disable
Joe wrote:
I had the same comment about being in a project, why oh why does it have to
be this way?
Yea, I agree what's up with that? If I can keep hammering on the minor
issues, when it generates gerbers it would be nice to have them placed
neatly in a folder instead of spewing the output
-Original Message-
From: John A. Ross [Design] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 12:21 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Need more software
-Original Message-
From: Mike Reagan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 4:56 PM
-Original Message-
From: Mike Reagan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 7:20 PM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Need more software
Joe wrote:
I had the same comment about being in a project, why oh why
does it have to be this way?
Yea, I
On 01:15 AM 15/04/2004, Mike Reagan said:
You also mentioned 2004 did not support unconnected nets constraints. That
would explain why saving the file back to version 4 is not completely
compatible. Thanks for the clarification
P2004 does not support (apparently) the unconnected nets constraints
i think all the files should always just go in:
My Documents
i suppose it could have sub directories of
My Schematics My FPGAs etc
:} only kidding but hey, it's good enough for MS !
seriously, i think something like John has proposed sounds
reasonable
if i read this correctly then a zip could
If you have a need to use 2004, I would recommend purchasing additional DRC software.
ie Lavenir ( Pentalogix) Veiwmate or
Viewmaster. 2004 is more prone to leaving hanging traces if you need to heavily
modify a design. Unless you mask every net that needs edited, in the single layer
mode
On 11:01 AM 14/04/2004, John A. Ross [RSDTV] said:
-Original Message-
From: edsi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 1:24 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: [PEDA] Need more software
If you have a need to use 2004, I would recommend purchasing
additional DRC
be a step down since I purely
rely on Protel's package for all of my DRC needs.
_
Brian Guralnick
- Original Message -
From: John A. Ross [RSDTV]
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 9:01 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Need more software
-Original
On 01:35 PM 14/04/2004, Brian Guralnick said:
If you keep consistent design practices geared around 99SE's DRC
capabilities, yes, some things may take a little extra effort, but, you
should be able to maximize out the built in DRC without having to do
checks with additional tools.
18 matches
Mail list logo
