Re: [PEDA] Antwort: Protel Crashes

2001-11-28 Thread ga


Hi,

there is a small program called CTSPD
(ftp://ftp.heise.de/pub/ct/ctsi/ctspd092.zip) that does conformity and
plausibility checks on the EEPROM contents of SDRAM modules. If a module
fails this check, it does not necessarily mean that it is not working
properly, but that the EEPROM data analyzed by the BIOS are not as
expected. You have this effect frequently with cheap no-name modules. This
may lead to non-suitable SDRAM controller initialisation by the BIOS. Nice
little program. Disadvantage for most of you: only German language, but
delf-explaining.
I had this program check SDRAM modules on Compaq Presario computers. The
result was: Error, error, error, ..  They seem to implement the
cheapest stuff available on the market into their computers. I had a
Presario PIII 500 until spring this year. Nothin but trouble.

Regards,

Gisbert Auge



   
   
Bob Jones
   
Digitized@maAn: Protel EDA Forum 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
il.com  Kopie:
   
 Thema:  Re: [PEDA] Protel Crashes 
   
27.11.2001 
   
21:03  
   
Bitte  
   
antworten an   
   
Protel EDA
   
Forum 
   
   
   
   
   




I too use a Compaq, although not the same as yours, and get maybe 2-5
lock-ups per week. I don't think they are Protel (Altium, whatever)
related.
I think they may be memory leaks or hardware related. Today, as a matter of
fact I've downloaded a program called Memokit from MacAfee, suppose to
improve memory leaks and memory performance and all that good stuff. I'll
try to keep you posted.


- Original Message -
From: Jeff Adolphs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 3:19 PM
Subject: [PEDA] Protel Crashes


Hello! I have had extended RAM removed from my computer thinking the RAM
was bad.

Computer is Compaq Ipaq, now with 64 meg of RAM, W2K.

Day One: no computer crashes.

Day Two: three Protel 99SE crashes. All three gave an error window
starting with something like: Access violation at address 00444C65 in
module 'Client99...   All three crashes were in a span of 5 1/2 hours
(10:15 AM EST, 11:15 AM EST, and 3:00 PM EST).

Question: Could the 3 Protel 99SE crashes be from running with only 64
meg of RAM, Protel needs reloaded from numerous crashes with bad
extended RAM, or other hardware problems suspected? Any guesses?

Thank You!
Jeff







* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Protel Crashes

2001-11-28 Thread Rene Tschaggelar

There is Parity memory and there is ECC memory,
but when the buyers always want the cheapest ...
You don't really expect a 500$ PC to have all the stuff
that is built into a 5000$ machine, do you ?

I think it way off to use software to mask hardware faults.

Rene

Jon Elson wrote:
 
 Whew!  Having worked on a number of mini-mainframe systems over
 the years (when they were king) and having gotten used to having
 the computer stop rather than blundering on destroying data in
 hidden ways, this is really intolerable!  It is totally apalling that
 modern
 computers don't even have parity in most cases, no less ECC memory.
 I guess there are server-grade motherboards that do have these
 features.


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



[PEDA] Two new add-ons

2001-11-28 Thread me

Hi,

I have two add-ons that i would like to share with others. They have saved
me a lot of time. They are unfortunately not very well documented. I
haven't had time to write any help files. I will put a readme file with the
add-ons that give some instructions about how to use them. I don't have
time to give any support to them but if you have questions you can send me
an email.

The first is a pcb utility that makes identical copy of a pcb layout. It is
very useful for complete subcircuits and for example decoupling capacitor
placement on identical circuits. It does not copy components, it moves them
to a new location. That means when you have made your master copy of the
subcircuit you can get other components to replicate this pattern. It uses
the designator with an increment number to determine which components to
move. This requires that you spend some time when you annotate your
schematic, but it is usually worth it. I have been trying to rewrite it to
increase stability and performance, but I haven't found the time. That's
the reason I haven't released this earlier.

The second is a schematic utility that let you perform a global change on
document options so that you can easily change information used in your
templates. This saves a lot of time compared to editing every schematic.

I will try to upload these two add-ons to the protel-users yahoo-group
later today.

Regards
Mattias Ericson

--


Mattias Ericson
Omnisys Instruments AB
Gruvgatan 8
SE-421 30  Västra Frölunda, SWEDEN
Phone: +46 31 734 34 08
Fax:  +46 31 734 34 29¢š,µ©ž²Æ zf¢–Ú)®‹^•çZ~Šîš×œ†Ç«¾)Ür‰“¢Wš½ëaŠÉb²Ûâ²+a¶Úÿ
0µç!±êïŠw¢o鮋^–ë®Ïåy«Þ†Ù¥
‰íiËm…éb²Ùš¨®f¢–Ú¢»¦Ù¢ž+-­«h­7œ…'«¼‰Ür‰…¢»¦èzX§zÄn•ë!¶Úÿ
0µç!±êïŠw¢o鮋^–ë®Ïߢ»¦®é^²f”èÂǨ­'š­Èi­ëâ¢ë)¢Ëbž!¶Úÿ
0™¨¥j·!Š÷œ¢o鮋^•çZ~Šîš×œ†Ç«¾)Ür‰


Re: [PEDA] Schematic driven PCB Layout (and schematic net classes)

2001-11-28 Thread Jan Martin Wagenaar

Hi Steve!

Please beware that when you use PcbDirectives *all* items mentioned in
the PcbDirective-menu are placed upon the net. This includes f.e. the
'routing layer' resulting in that the net is*only* routed on that layer
as only one layer can be selected. 
Of course you can delete all the unused design-rules in PCB, but if you
use this a lot this becomes a cumbersome task. Especially as only one
design-rule can be deleted at a time.
You have already discovered that only integers can be entered and that
the unit vcan not be entered in the schematic.
It is these silly facts that keep me from using PcbDirectives as they
are presently available in Protel. 

I am however in the proces of writing a server that allows the use of
the 'width' part of the PcbDirectives as well as add netclasses in the
schematic. The latter are similar to the netclasses in PCB, and allow
nets to be placed in classes, have directives added to them (Ok,
presently only the 'routing width') and transfer those classes to PCB's
netclasses. In this process I can also import the 'width'-part of
PcbDirectives allowing the user to select the unit (mils, mm or 0.1mm).

The MinWidth, Maxwidth and PreferredWidth parameters are stored in the
database. 
I find this way quite usable (although it is not perfect yet).

If any of you are interested I can make a slightly more userfriendly
version available to the forum. Just let me know.

Cheers,
Jan Martin Wagenaar

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 27-11-01 19:57:17 
I want to use the PCBLayoutDirective, so that I can set up design
rules
from the schematic.
I've never used it before, but I've figured out how to use them, and
transfer them to the PCB, but why won't Protel let me edit the track,
or
via width to less than 1mm...I can't have 1mm tracks everywhere.

Steve 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html 
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html 
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com 
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Schematic driven PCB Layout

2001-11-28 Thread Stephen Smith

Yes, so I've reverted to changing the PCB editor to Imperial (using Q
shortcut key) before I update from the schematic.  I can then set, say
20 (mil) for a track of about 0.5mm, etc..  I then have to change back
to metric, but this is a bit long winded, as I have to do a conversion
everytime.

Steve

-Original Message-
From: Anthony Whitesell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 November 2001 18:49
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Schematic driven PCB Layout



Steve,

It appears that you have found the quirk called you can only use whole
numbers.  I tried setting an imperial track with to a decimal and it
does
not accept it.  Protel also does not seem to accept any track width
containing a decimal value (ie. 0.5mm, 7.5mm, 0.5mil, or 7.5mil).

Does this seem to be the problem?

Anthony Whitesell
Sunrise Labs
603-644-4500
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




 I want to use the PCBLayoutDirective, so that I can set up design
rules
 from the schematic.
 I've never used it before, but I've figured out how to use them, and
 transfer them to the PCB, but why won't Protel let me edit the track,
or
 via width to less than 1mm...I can't have 1mm tracks everywhere.

 Steve

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Corrupted Protel 99 SE SP6 Installation

2001-11-28 Thread rlamoreaux



 I am unable to open a Database file with Protel 99 SE with SP6.  When I
 try to open one, the program gives me the New Design Database dialog.
 This installation on my computer used to work.


Did you try repairing the database? This is in the system menu on the far
left under Design Utilities.

Rob





* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Protel Crashes

2001-11-28 Thread rlamoreaux



 There is Parity memory and there is ECC memory,
 but when the buyers always want the cheapest ...
 You don't really expect a 500$ PC to have all the stuff
 that is built into a 5000$ machine, do you ?

 I think it way off to use software to mask hardware faults.

but when you get to more than 4 bits of parity it is much better to use
those bits to do ECC since the cost is the same. This is why all current
machine support ECC not parity. Also ECC is not using software to mask
hardware faults, it is using hardware to correct hardware faults. Parity in
PCs, on the other hand, used software to stop the machine after a hardware
fault.

Today's memory is much more reliable than it was 15 or 20 years ago so
advantage of ECC to the home user is not worth the cost. I check any new
memory and than I don't worry about it. I did not check once on a non-ECC
memory DIMM and had the memory work fine until I switched to Win2K.
Investigating, I found that there was an unsoldered pin on one of the
chips. Obviously Win 95 didn't actually use that memory, and Win2k/WinNT
uses everything it can get the problem never occured under Win95. This
would not have been a problem with ECC memory since the hardware would have
used the extra bits to correct the bad data line on every read.




* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Protel Crashes

2001-11-28 Thread Bagotronix Tech Support

  There is Parity memory and there is ECC memory,
  but when the buyers always want the cheapest ...
  You don't really expect a 500$ PC to have all the stuff
  that is built into a 5000$ machine, do you ?

I expect reliability from everything I buy, no matter how cheap or expensive
it is.

 machine support ECC not parity. Also ECC is not using software to mask
 hardware faults, it is using hardware to correct hardware faults. Parity
in
 PCs, on the other hand, used software to stop the machine after a hardware
 fault.

I think what the original poster was implying is a shifting of blame, not a
prevention.  If the software crashes, whatever the reason, people tend to
blame software first.  This tendency to shift blame to software can be
exploited by ethically challenged hardware vendors to mask faults in
hardware.

 Today's memory is much more reliable than it was 15 or 20 years ago so
 advantage of ECC to the home user is not worth the cost. I check any new
 memory and than I don't worry about it. I did not check once on a non-ECC
 memory DIMM and had the memory work fine until I switched to Win2K.
 Investigating, I found that there was an unsoldered pin on one of the
 chips. Obviously Win 95 didn't actually use that memory, and Win2k/WinNT

Perhaps, but as you have documented, the most reliable non-ECC memory chips
in the cosmos can't make up for a bad solder connection, broken track, etc.
And don't forget the Single Event Upset phenomena, which will become ever
more pervasive as geometries shrink.  If all memory was ECC, it would no
longer be a specialty item, and therefore enjoy the same cutthroat volume
pricing that non-ECC memory does now.  And that would be a good thing.  I
refute the notion that home users don't deserve reliability - most home
users don't know how to recover their machines after a major system crash.
This is like saying that only auto mechanics need reliable cars - everyone
else can use lemons.  Every non-techie I know who has a computer is really
frustrated with it.  And guess who they call for help?  Hint:  not Compaq,
not Microsoft.  If the PC industry wants to revive their sales, they need to
start making better machines with better software on them.  So far the only
advantage I see to the GHz wars is that you can execute your way to the next
crash faster than before ;-)

Best regards,
Ivan Baggett
Bagotronix Inc.
website:  www.bagotronix.com

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



[PEDA] Phatom polygons??

2001-11-28 Thread Tommy Åkesson

Hi 
Having problems with invisible polygones.
Tryed out the Item 2434 in knowledge base.
But when changin layer in spread I get the message 
Sorry, board was not updated correcly

Running 99 SE SP6

What to do??

Regards
Tommy 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Phatom polygons??

2001-11-28 Thread Amy Nolen

Hi Tommy,

I had that problem too. I closed all the files in that database including
the documents folder (only have the .ddb tab and .pcb tab showing) and then
try it again.

Thanks,
Amy Nolen
PCB Layout Technician
RF Micro Devices
7914 Piedmont Triad Parkway
Greensboro NC 27409
(336) 931-7099


-Original Message-
From: Tommy Åkesson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:16 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: [PEDA] Phatom polygons??


Hi 
Having problems with invisible polygones.
Tryed out the Item 2434 in knowledge base.
But when changin layer in spread I get the message 
Sorry, board was not updated correcly

Running 99 SE SP6

What to do??

Regards
Tommy 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



[PEDA] News about protel

2001-11-28 Thread Eric Bobillier

Hi
I have phone today to my local représentative seller of protel and he tell
me than the new version of protel be disponible in second semester of 2002 .
He tell me to, don't waiting new service pack before new version. A special
offer be propose to the old customer of 99se but he don't now the cost.
Other news ?
Regards.

E.BOBILLIER
INRA UMRVP
DOMAINE DE LA PRISE
35590 ST GILLES
FRANCE
Tel: 02 23 48 50 76
Fax: 02 23 48 50 80
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



[PEDA] SV: Phatom polygons??

2001-11-28 Thread Tommy Åkesson

OK

That works.
But my main problem that startet all this was:
When I pour polygon it pour all over the components, have checkt
 connect to net and remove dead cupper.
It did not do this in beginning of my work.

Any ideas??

Tanks
Tommy


-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Amy Nolen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Skickat: den 28 november 2001 17:21
Till: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Ämne: Re: [PEDA] Phatom polygons??


Hi Tommy,

I had that problem too. I closed all the files in that database including
the documents folder (only have the .ddb tab and .pcb tab showing) and then
try it again.

Thanks,
Amy Nolen
PCB Layout Technician
RF Micro Devices
7914 Piedmont Triad Parkway
Greensboro NC 27409
(336) 931-7099


-Original Message-
From: Tommy Åkesson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:16 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: [PEDA] Phatom polygons??


Hi
Having problems with invisible polygones.
Tryed out the Item 2434 in knowledge base.
But when changin layer in spread I get the message
Sorry, board was not updated correcly

Running 99 SE SP6

What to do??

Regards
Tommy

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Add-ons uploaded

2001-11-28 Thread Rene Tschaggelar

thanks for the two lines describing what they do.

Rene

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 The two add-ons have been uploaded to the following webpage.
 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protel-users
 
 I hope they work and that you find them useful.


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



[PEDA] Tasking Offer

2001-11-28 Thread Steve Baldwin

I haven't seen it mentioned here (I may have skipped over it) but 
those of you who are multi-talented may be interested in the 
special offer on the Protel website.
It applies to ATS holders _and_ current P99SE owners. Sign up 
and get a free copy of Tasking 51 and XA C compilers.

Steve.

==
Steve BaldwinElectronic Product Design
TLA Microsystems Ltd Microcontroller Specialists
PO Box 15-680, New Lynn  http://www.tla.co.nz
Auckland, New Zealandph  +64 9 820-2221
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  fax +64 9 820-1929
==

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Corrupted Protel 99 SE SP6 Installation

2001-11-28 Thread Douglas Alden


I did some further investigation on my system and determined that I had
installed the SWIFT Designer Software Tool from Texas Instruments on the
same day the problem manifested itself.  As far as I can tell it must have
written over some critical files. I worked with Protel for several hours
after I had installed the SWIFT software without issue so I originally did
not think it caused the problem I encountered when I closed the session
and reopened it.  I have since deleted the SWIFT software.  I am not sure
I want to reinstall it to test my theory.

I did try installing the latest version of MDAC without success.

In order to get back up and running I had to follow the directions in
Knowledge Base Item 2450.  I came to this conclusion after having the same
problem noted in 2450 when I tried to open a new design data base.  I had
to do a variant of option 3.  Rather than reinstalling the operating
system and applications, I chose to repair the Windows 2000 installation.
I am now back in business.

Thanks,

Douglas

On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Ian Wilson wrote:

 At 04:08 PM 27/11/01 -0800, you wrote:

 I am unable to open a Database file with Protel 99 SE with SP6.  When I
 try to open one, the program gives me the New Design Database dialog.
 This installation on my computer used to work.
 
 I have tried removing and reinstalling Protel 99 SE and Service Pack 6
 without success.  I disabled my virus checking software during the
 install.  I am running Windows 2000 with SP2.
 
 Are there any hidden registry settings I need to be aware of?
 
 Any hints would be appreciated.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Douglas

 Douglas - this has come up before and I think there is  one or more KB
 article(s) on the Protel www site on this problem.  I have seen the p

 KB item 1985 is one candidate - do you use apostrophe's in any folder/file
 names?

 Also, I am not sure but I seem to recall that the MDAC problem can have
 this or similar effect.  Search for MDAC on the Protel KB.  Basic issue is
 that the MS database drivers have been overwritten by some other
 program/installer.

 Ian Wilson



Douglas Alden
Integrative Oceanography Division
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
University of California San Diego
9500 Gilman Drive 0209
La Jolla CA 92093-0209

(858) 534-8997
(858) 534-8299 fax

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] News about protel

2001-11-28 Thread Brad Velander

Well,
that date certainly would jive with some recent discussions that I
had with Protel about the ATS support program. I was asked not to quote the
individual but the basic discussion was:
At Protel there was discussed a preliminary date by which all P99SE
users, who purchased P99SE before Oct 1 2001, would have to buy the ATS
support package. This date was July 2002. The startling point about this
date, after July 2002 you would receive no technical support for P99SE
unless you had purchased the ATS package. As I mentioned, the date was
tossed around in some discussions at Protel and is not a hard and fast date
at this time. This is the gist of the conversation I had with a customer
service rep.
Get prepared to shell out for what has always been free at Protel. I
would also print out the news bulletin pages about ATS. Especially the ones
that state existing (pre-Oct 1 2001) P99se users would continue to receive
free technical support as usual without purchasing ATS. That way your legal
department can 'threaten' to sue them if they wish, for failing to live up
to their publically stated policy.

Sincerely,
Brad Velander.

Lead PCB Designer
Norsat International Inc.
#300 - 4401 Still Creek Drive,
Burnaby, B.C., Canada, V5C 6G9.
Tel   (604) 292-9089 (direct line)
Fax  (604) 292-9010
Website: www.norsat.com


-Original Message-
From: Eric Bobillier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEDA] News about protel


Hi
I have phone today to my local représentative seller of protel and he tell
me than the new version of protel be disponible in second semester of 2002 .
He tell me to, don't waiting new service pack before new version. A special
offer be propose to the old customer of 99se but he don't now the cost.
Other news ?
Regards.

E.BOBILLIER
INRA UMRVP
DOMAINE DE LA PRISE
35590 ST GILLES
FRANCE
Tel: 02 23 48 50 76
Fax: 02 23 48 50 80
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] News about protel

2001-11-28 Thread Tony Karavidas

How many of us actually use Protel's support? I know I don't anymore. How
much of a problem would that really be for us if we lost it officially?

The newbies could come here and ask us oldtimers.

Tony



 -Original Message-
 From: Brad Velander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 12:48 PM
 To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
 Subject: Re: [PEDA] News about protel


 Well,
   that date certainly would jive with some recent discussions that I
 had with Protel about the ATS support program. I was asked not to
 quote the
 individual but the basic discussion was:
   At Protel there was discussed a preliminary date by which all P99SE
 users, who purchased P99SE before Oct 1 2001, would have to buy the ATS
 support package. This date was July 2002. The startling point about this
 date, after July 2002 you would receive no technical support for P99SE
 unless you had purchased the ATS package. As I mentioned, the date was
 tossed around in some discussions at Protel and is not a hard and
 fast date
 at this time. This is the gist of the conversation I had with a customer
 service rep.
   Get prepared to shell out for what has always been free at Protel. I
 would also print out the news bulletin pages about ATS.
 Especially the ones
 that state existing (pre-Oct 1 2001) P99se users would continue to receive
 free technical support as usual without purchasing ATS. That way
 your legal
 department can 'threaten' to sue them if they wish, for failing to live up
 to their publically stated policy.

 Sincerely,
 Brad Velander.

 Lead PCB Designer
 Norsat International Inc.
 #300 - 4401 Still Creek Drive,
 Burnaby, B.C., Canada, V5C 6G9.
 Tel   (604) 292-9089 (direct line)
 Fax  (604) 292-9010
 Website: www.norsat.com



* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] News about protel

2001-11-28 Thread HxEngr




Re: [PEDA] News about protel

2001-11-28 Thread Tony Karavidas

Ha ha, I mean in protel years. I'm only 37! In fact, TODAY is my B-day.
Bummer I have to work!


Tony


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 1:07 PM
 To: Protel EDA Forum
 Subject: Re: [PEDA] News about protel


 In a message dated 11/28/01 4:04:58 PM Eastern Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


  The newbies could come here and ask us oldtimers.
 
 

 Hey there! Just who are you calling old?
 Steve Hendrix

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] News about protel

2001-11-28 Thread Steve Smith

I've only been using Protel for just over a year and have
used their support only once, just after we got the software.
This forum has been so much more user friendly and useful
than the official support that to be a renegade will be no
problem at all.

Protel's free service and updates where a major selling point
for the software and we would probably not have purchased the
package if ATS had existed at the time.  We are seriously
considering going to a different software since we only do
about 10 to 15 boards a year and will have trouble justifying
the $2K scamming, oops, I mean support fee each year.

Steve Smith
Product Engineer
Staco Energy Products Co.
Web Site: www.stacoenergy.com


 

 -Original Message-
 From: Tony Karavidas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:59 PM
 To: Protel EDA Forum
 Subject: Re: [PEDA] News about protel
 
 
 How many of us actually use Protel's support? I know I don't 
 anymore. How
 much of a problem would that really be for us if we lost it 
 officially?
 
 The newbies could come here and ask us oldtimers.
 
 Tony

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Routines

2001-11-28 Thread Brian Guralnick

My macros are located at:
Just copy this link location into your internet explorer address bar:

ftp://ftp.point-lab.com/quartus/Public/ProtelUsers/

This is a free address.
The macros I have written are free.

QFPfootprintGeneratorScript.bas - Protel ClientBasic footprint generator script.
QFPfootprintGeneratorScript.txt   - added documentation.
SmoothTrackSizeTransitionProtelScript.bas - Protel ClientBasic smooth size track
transition.
SpiralGeneratorProtelScript.bas - Protel ClientBasic spiral inductor generator.
InductorGeneratorProtelScript.bas - Protel ClientBasic continuous -S- shaped inductor
generator.

SuperCompact.zip - super compact generic schematic symbols library.



Brian Guralnick


- Original Message -
From: Ian Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 7:43 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Routines


| At 10:19 AM 28/11/01 +1100, you wrote:
| There are a few here:
| 
| http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protel-users/files/
|
| As well as the yahoo groups file space there are a number of other places
| to get 3rd party servers and macros.  Some free some paid for.
|
| I have a few free servers at
| http://www.considered.com.au/Protel01.htm  (some shareware ones as
| well).  I removed my free servers from the yahoo groups as access is only
| for members and not  everyone wanted to be a member (this was due to some
| (minor) concern about the copyright situation with yahoo groups and also so
| I could monitor downloads).
|
| I know that Brian G. has some macros for solving various problems - a QFP
| generator and there was a spiral trace generator as well wasn't there?
| (Brian or someone - can you give the address please.)
|
| Also, http://www.eda.co.uk has some freeware and more elaborate servers:
| http://www.eda.co.uk/premdwn.htm
|
| Aspiring technology have some freebies as well as more $ servers.
| http://www.aspiring-technology.com/download.html
|
| QualECad have a (or more?) freeware server(s) as well as a well-reputed 3D
| server.
|
| Desktop EDA have some servers but I am not sure if there are many freebies.
| http://www.desktop-eda.com.au/download/download.htm
|
| I am sure there are others, I apologise if I skipped anyone,
| Ian Wilson
|
|
|   -Original Message-
|   From: Sean James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|   Sent: Wednesday, 28 November 2001 2:53 AM
|   To: Protel EDA Forum
|   Subject: [PEDA] Routines
|  
|  
|   Is there an archive or FTP site that has home-grown
|   routines for Protel?
|  
|  
|   Sean James
|   PCB Designer
|   Telecast Fiber Systems, Inc.
|   102 Grove Street
|   Worcester, MA 01605
|   (TEL) 508.754.4858 x33
|   (FAX) 413.541.6170
|  
|  
|
|

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] SV: Phatom polygons??

2001-11-28 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax

At 05:42 PM 11/28/01 +0100, Tommy Åkesson wrote:
But my main problem that startet all this was:
When I pour polygon it pour all over the components, have checkt
 connect to net and remove dead cupper.
It did not do this in beginning of my work.

Any ideas??

When remove dead copper is checked, all copper in the polygon pour that 
is not connected to a pad with the net in question, or maybe a via (there 
is a little weird behavior here, about which I recently wrote), will be 
removed. If there is no connected copper, the whole polygon disappears.

It may be a good idea to pour a polygon, when there is any doubt, without 
dead copper removal turned on. Then verify that there are connected pads, 
perhaps use highlight connected copper from a pad in your net to verify 
that the polygon tracks have been connected.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Abdulrahman Lomax
Easthampton, Massachusetts USA

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *