On Mar 27, 11:43 am, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.com wrote:
On Mar 26, 2011, at 9:37 PM, kstubs wrote:
Is it bad, or does it make parsing objects unstable if you append
custom attributes to an HTML tag? Lets say I want to keep track of
a number, maybe a customers ID, so I do
On Feb 24, 2:21 am, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.com wrote:
I believe this is a requirement -- that I not use remove -- because
the elements I'm trying to move around all have form element observers
attached directly to their children, and I am pretty sure this will
mess me up.
On Feb 18, 10:28 am, Jeffrey Lee jlee...@gmail.com wrote:
So why is it that when Javascript is updating the document, does the source
not show the change? Does show-source merely reflect that which was loaded,
but not the actual current document? Why is that?
View source shows the
On Jan 20, 4:50 pm, Ran Berenfeld berenfeld...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you for the advise.
one more / last question to clarify.
In one of the articles about javascript scopes I read that using var
inside a class constructor actually
creates a private member of the class. is it true ?
No.
On Jan 19, 11:31 pm, Ran Berenfeld berenfeld...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all
sorry for this stupid question, but all these talks about the *this
pointer and the variable
scope in js got me confused.
A function's this keyword has nothing to do with scope.
support I have 2 functions, one
On Dec 16, 12:36 am, doug douglass_da...@earthlink.net wrote:
[...]
Any ideas on how I can do this without an IE7 browser detect?
Let me know if this works in IE 7:
URL: http://www.cinsoft.net/position.html
--
Rob
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
On Dec 3, 6:16 am, KenB kenber...@gmail.com wrote:
I am new to prototype and need to learn how to traverse an html table
and hide some columns. The only id I have is table id or the class it
is associated with. Can anyone give me an example?
Here is what I am trying to accomplish.
var
On Nov 18, 8:06 pm, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
On Nov 17, 2:07 pm, Phil Petree phil.pet...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
In the case of ie6, with less than 5% of all page views (and rapidly
declining), it is now a footnote so why support it at all?
The OP's issue has nothing to
On Oct 25, 9:40 pm, Paco Gómez pacogomezgrana...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi TJ,
I'm Jose's partner. The thing I don't understand is why we can recover
memory after creating any other kind of object, but not with DOM
elements.
I don't see the issue in either Firefox or IE 6.
[...]
Do you have
On Sep 1, 6:54 pm, Richard Quadling rquadl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 August 2010 20:16, kstubs kst...@gmail.com wrote:
I notice that if I intend to add class to an element that I must use
className and not class for my object. But what if I intend to name
my element? What do you use
On Aug 31, 10:44 pm, jhaagmans jaap.haagm...@gmail.com wrote:
You obviously didn't read the entire post, as the expected behaviour
for an enter press is to submit the form that is currently visible and
not the one that is hidden. That's what I'm trying to accomplish.
I in fact figured out
On Jul 29, 9:41 pm, Richard Quadling rquadl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
I'm developing a tiny little web page app which allows vehicle
inspectors to see the work last carried out on a vehicle.
[...]
For the touch screen systems, I'd like to be able to implement some
touch screen support.
[...]
On Aug 2, 3:43 pm, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
I found that array looping method online, I guess I will remove that
page from my bookmarks.
Yes, it's an extremely common misconception.
What, that for..in iterates over an object's properties? It's per
ECMA-262. There
On Aug 3, 2:19 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
Yes, it's an extremely common misconception.
What, that for..in iterates over an object's properties?
No, that it loops over array indexes.
I'm missing something here. Array indexes are properties, which is why
they
On Apr 10, 8:36 pm, chrysanthe m chrysant...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, again
Sorry for being obtuse. But can someone help me and even understand how to
write a function and call it on a hash that will take a value, compare it
against each of the keys in the hash, on match delete the key/value,
On Feb 5, 5:31 pm, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
If the function is expected as a property of some object (including
`window`), then I'd probably do this:
if (typeof obj.functionName == 'function')
So for instance:
if (typeof window.globalEval == 'function')
On Dec 23, 4:17 am, david david.brill...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Loris,
I think that your trouble is normal, because IE don't allow to
instantiate method on native object.
You might need to re-think that statement. From ECMA-262:
Native Object
A native object is any object supplied by an
On Sep 29, 8:45 am, KammylandSoftware kammyl...@gmail.com wrote:
When ever you add oberservers to the same event such as
Event.oberve(myElement, mousedown, someMethod_1());
Event.oberve(myElement, mousedown, someMethod_2());
does IE execute them in REVERSE order upon fire?
They get
On Sep 29, 2:54 am, mhgrove mhgr...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to have the button call a function which first schedules a call
to show the busy spinner after say like 5 seconds. This way if the
call to the server is fast, there's no blip on screen of the spinner
just before the page
On Sep 3, 12:07 am, Hipnotik pork...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
How to call some action if content of the div element has changed?
I'm talking about something like this:
$(my-div).observe(change, function(e) {
alert(hello);
});
Expecting behavior:
I have this
div id=my-divsome text/div
On Sep 3, 1:56 am, enigment enigm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmmm, even outside the indexOf() question, this is a bit creepy to me.
I hadn't previously tested, but these are all true, at least in
Firefox 3.5 and IE8:
[...]
new String(mpg) !== new String(mpg)
new String(mpg) != new
On Aug 19, 5:30 am, drewB dbats...@gmail.com wrote:
As I see it the advantages of doing it client-side are:
- The server can handle more users because less work is done there
Unlikely. There is very little difference in computation effort
between generating JSON, XML, HTML or delimited text
On Jun 23, 5:29 am, dy3g0s dy3...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I actually work with Slideshare API, php and prototype. I make a cURL
call in php to consume a certain Slideshare API method, the php script
return an xml result with the header header('Content-type: text/
xml'); I obtain a xml
On Jun 10, 7:09 am, david david.brill...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alex,
If the code WAS working, the error could be on the received JSON ?
One though, IE don't like misplaced comma on JSON. For exemple, last
element of an array that is followed by a comma don't work on IE.
What do don't like
On Jun 5, 8:15 pm, Jeztah webmas...@thecarmarketplace.com wrote:
Morning...
Very silly and easy question but my brain isn't working today
How can i get the last row of a table (table id=foo) ...
Tables have a rows collection that includes all rows in the table.
Try:
var rows =
On Jun 2, 5:32 am, molo maurice_lowent...@ssga.com wrote:
I could use some help. I've been looking at this all day and cannot
come up with a solution
I am using the same routine on these 5 input fields. If I type in a
character on one of these fields and press enter, it works as expected
On May 21, 11:11 pm, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi Joe,
T.J.'s factory suggestion...
FWIW, I think it was Doug's suggestion, I just updated it a bit.
function DateFactory(){
var fName, that = new Date();
for (fName in SpecialDateProps)
that[fName] =
On May 22, 12:11 am, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.com wrote:
I'd like to see what events are there for the observing, particularly
on an iframe.
The iframe element doesn't support any events[1]. The document that
it contains may support various events (such as load, click, etc.).
Is
On May 19, 9:26 pm, ColinFine colin.f...@pace.com wrote:
This is a case when you really truly want just the facilities that
Javascript provides (prototypes rather than classes), and using
(pretend) classes makes it harder not easier.
Yes, although some may argue that it is better to create
On May 15, 6:54 pm, marioosh marioosh@gmail.com wrote:
I have a id=ph href=#.
I want to do that (sorry for my poor english):
When user click ph, i need to set href to some usable address (by
sending request Ajax.Request) and fire onclick once again.
That seems unnecessarily complex, why
On May 13, 6:12 pm, keemor kee...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to present 3 ways of building ul list and compare the speed
of them.
I used firebug's profiler on FF3
html:
body
a href=# id=gogo/a
ul id=list/ul
/body
$('go').observe('click',go);
[...]
Third:
Time
On May 12, 1:20 pm, RobG rg...@iinet.net.au wrote:
[...]
Javascript can emulate many object models, not just classic OO or
class-based iheritance.
That should have been: many *inheritance* models
--
Rob
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
On May 1, 1:42 am, Bertrand bertrand.char...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, actually, my managers are pushing for self-contained javascript
code (trying to get rid of all the library calls, which isn't
necessarily a good idea, but I have to abide).
So I ended up using a DOM-compliant version using
On Apr 25, 3:37 pm, Ananth Raghuraman araghuram...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for pointing me to the native functions!
In the meantime I also found 1.8 has the Number object/function.
The Number constructor is a built-in ECMAScript function. When called
as a function, it does type conversion:
On Apr 25, 2:06 am, Ananth Raghuraman araghuram...@gmail.com wrote:
Need prototype function to convert object/string/number to number. Please
help.
Without a more concise specification for what the object/string/number
might be, you will end up with a large function that works for a few
On Apr 24, 4:05 am, katz bridgeuto...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings.
I need to learn how to achieve to dynamically copy form field values
using Prototype or possibly Ruby.
I want to achieve something like
this:http://websitebuildersresource.com/2009/02/05/copy-form-input-data-to...
On Apr 22, 9:02 pm, Yozefff yoze...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible to observe when the content of a DIV is changed?
The W3C DOM 2 Events specification has an Interface MutationEvent for
that purpose (and others). Support may vary across browsers:
URL:
On Apr 22, 9:57 am, disccomp discc...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's the working code:http://pastie.org/454045
OK, here it is:
| $N = function(ns){
*Always* declare variables. I can't see why you don't use:
function $N(ns) {
or, because I dislike the use of $ in variable names:
function
On Apr 18, 4:46 am, Doug Reeder reeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a list of which DOM properties and methods are useful when using
Prototype, and which are unnecessary, given the availability of Prototype
methods?
It is not so much what is necessary or not, but what might be an
appropriate
On Apr 14, 3:11 pm, Doug Reeder reeder...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to allow the user to select a file from his/her filesystem,
and process it locally. Due to heightened security (or at least the
semblance thereof) the value of a file input element is just the name
of the file, not
On Apr 10, 11:09 am, swdean magic...@gmail.com wrote:
I am quite new to coding and I am trying to show div in case js is
disabled
the reason is because I set it to display: none
Don't do that, consider the noscript element.
URL http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/scripts.html#edef-NOSCRIPT
On Apr 2, 5:57 pm, basti bastian.friedr...@am-soft.de wrote:
Good morning,
I wanted to use the method getElementsByClassName by prototype to
retrieve an array of objects. Using my Firefox 3.0.7 on Windows XP
alert told me that the returned value by this method is a Nodelist,
which I
On Apr 2, 4:43 am, Diodeus diod...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the Prototype equivalent of this jQuery code?
I would like to select all of the radio button with a certain name.
$('#billship input:radio[name=shipType]');
All of the following will return a live NodeList:
On Mar 30, 9:36 pm, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.com wrote:
Take a look at Form.Observer
I think you meant to reply to the OP.
-- it's ideal for this sort of thing.
I don't think it is.
It
watches the form in a tight loop (at your specified interval) and if
there are any changes
On Mar 27, 9:35 am, Hector Virgen djvir...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
As for speed, I would imagine that event.element() is faster than
$('object_id') because even.element() is just accessing a property, instead
of searching the dom for a node. But I could be wrong on this :)
Logic would say
On Mar 27, 10:02 pm, Lapis petter.env...@gmail.com wrote:
I do like this sometimes, when the scoping is ok:
var submitter = $('submitter');
if (submitter) {
submitter.observe('click', function (event) {
// use submitter here
});
};
It is great, time-wise.
And exploits IE's
On Mar 18, 12:00 pm, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, so to summarize:
1) TextArea have a value property (as per DOM 2 specs),
2) Prototype Element#setValue uses the value property (not the HTML
value attribute),
3) Proper, standard compliant way of doing what OP wants:
On Mar 18, 11:26 pm, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.com wrote:
I'm so confused...
About what?
--
Rob
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group,
On Mar 17, 11:02 am, ViniH vinihol...@googlemail.com wrote:
I have a textarea on a page which contains notes as text. Html encoded
entities are encoded correctly for display in order to pass XHTML 1.0
strict validation (which is a company requirement).
I would like to see the reasons why,
On Mar 18, 1:41 am, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.com wrote:
Would $('myTextArea').update('new string') be of any use, then? If the
underlying mechanism of update() is to set the innerHTML property,
wouldn't this be a nice shortcut?
It isn't much of a shortcut to call a function that
On Mar 18, 2:24 am, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com wrote:
As previously discussed here, setAttribute sets the HTML attribute,
which does not update the displayed value in some browsers.
ViniH is correctly using Element#setValue,
Yes, I misread that as setAttribute.
which abstracts
On Mar 18, 11:02 am, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.com wrote:
Not to belabor the point, but as Tobie pointed out already, textarea
elements don't **have** a value property to manipulate.
You've got your wires crossed - if you'd quoted what you were replying
to, you'd see that it was me
On Mar 17, 4:10 am, kangax kan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 16, 1:13 pm, arkady arkad...@gmail.com wrote:
if trying to strip off the everything before the body and everything
after /body
response.replace(/.*(?=body)/, '').replace(/(\/body).*/, '$1');
That seems a bit risky, the string
On Mar 7, 4:29 am, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi again, Rob.
I don't really want to argue over the benefits of attributes versus
expandos, just wanted to outline that they weren't the same thing
although the specs mandate a mapping of specified expandos to their
attribute
On Mar 7, 12:53 pm, kangax kan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 6, 7:07 am, RobG rg...@iinet.net.au wrote:
[...]
The differences are in the browsers' implementation of setAttribute,
For example, using setAttribute with any of the intrinsic event
handlers.
Setting intrinsic event handlers
On Mar 6, 8:16 pm, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com wrote:
writeAttribute does not fix cross browser differences in the
implementation of setAttribute.
How so? What's missing? File bugs! :)
The differences are in the browsers' implementation of setAttribute,
For example, using
On Mar 5, 6:53 pm, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com wrote:
Rob,
Please have a look at the DOM specs.
I have, the issue is how it's implemented. When the specs are written
without ambiguity and all browsers follow them, it might be reasonable
to use them as the sole criterion for doing
On Mar 5, 7:50 am, Bob bro...@packagingcorp.com wrote:
I'm relativley new to PrototypeJS. I
am doing some calculation in a back end program and returning a JSON
string to my web page. One of the values is a price. If I return
14.20, it gets converted in evalJSON to 14.2. I want to keep
On Mar 5, 7:32 am, Lee Jenkins l...@datatrakpos.com wrote:
Are there any known problems with writeAttribtue and FF3? I have a small
function:
function(obj){
Element.writeAttribute(obj.elname, obj.attr, obj.newValue);
}
It doesn't update the attribute.
How did you determine
On Mar 4, 7:13 pm, Alex Mcauley webmas...@thecarmarketplace.com
wrote:
Yes walter is correct... As far as i know you cannot insert an element into
another element if it does not exist in the DOM
I guess that by insert you mean append (and that isn't what Walter
said).
(as the element is
On Feb 26, 7:28 am, Lox gecka.comp...@gmail.com wrote:
[...] then prototype is becoming the mature
and stable platform for standardised/cross platform javascript
development.
I understand that, and quite second that, but Peppy or Sizzle are much
more faster at selecting elements by css
On Feb 24, 3:50 am, Hector Virgen djvir...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the clarification. I assumed that the attribute would be the same
as the element property, but I see now how they can be different.
To change the default value, use the defaultValue property:
URL:
On Feb 24, 2:15 am, SWilk wilkola...@gmail.com wrote:
Hector Virgen wrote:
Hello,
I am writing a plugin that takes a text input (input type=text/) and
hides it using $(input).hide(). The plugin then uses other controls to
update the value of the text input.
I am using
On Feb 23, 1:00 pm, Hector Virgen djvir...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am writing a plugin that takes a text input (input type=text/) and
hides it using $(input).hide(). The plugin then uses other controls to
update the value of the text input.
I am using Element.writeAttribute() to update
On Feb 19, 3:55 pm, RobG rg...@iinet.net.au wrote:
[...]
*Do not* use Prototype.js's sibling array as it will remove text
nodes, you certainly don't want to do that.
Not worded quite right: Prototype.js doesn't include text nodes in its
sibling arrays, but they should be used in this case so
On Feb 12, 1:03 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
Details here:http://prototypejs.org/learn/extensions
The following statement in that article is wrong:
...native objects such as HTMLElement...
HTMLElement is a *host* object, not a native object.
--
Rob
On Feb 10, 8:29 pm, Lars Schwarz lars.schw...@gmail.com wrote:
well, it's like fixing IE6 bugs. i mostly double-code functions like
form-checks that are
done pre-posting in javascript, to be checked again on server side
again for the case
javascript is turned off.
The reason to check on
On Feb 11, 11:21 am, doug douglass_da...@earthlink.net wrote:
I have read about Javascript and scope and I still don't really
understand it completely, particularly when it comes to Ajax.Updater.
I don't really understand, for example why, if there is a variable
window.myvar, some
On Feb 10, 9:35 pm, Jim Higson j...@333.org wrote:
On Feb 8, 1:19 pm, RobG rg...@iinet.net.au wrote:
[...]
It's a bit unfair to blame the language for what you consider an
inappropriate use of one of its features. Perhaps the name of the
function should be isStringPrimitive.
I guess I
On Feb 8, 12:55 am, Jim Higson j...@333.org wrote:
alert( Object.isString( foo ));
// alerts string
It alerts true.
alert( Object.isString( new String( foo ) ));
// alerts object
It alerts false.
I know why this happens - because Prototype uses the underlying typeof's
understanding
On Feb 8, 11:53 pm, kangax kan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 8, 8:19 am, RobG rg...@iinet.net.au wrote:
[...]
It can hardly be called a bug when it does what the documentation says
it does (I think works as designed is the polite response). The
function itself is a bit pointless though
On Feb 9, 11:37 am, kangax kan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 8, 7:32 pm, RobG rg...@iinet.net.au wrote:
On Feb 8, 11:53 pm, kangax kan...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
It's not pointless, but the scope of its use is indeed pretty narrow.
Can you provide a scenario where isNumber is more
On Feb 7, 12:21 am, kangax kan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 6, 7:36 am, ColinFine colin.f...@pace.com wrote:
On Feb 5, 9:29 pm, Michael mich...@vermontsnows.com wrote: Thank you all
- Kangax's low profile technique works like a champ.
Walter Lee: Regular expressions hurt my head. I
On Feb 4, 10:41 am, Richie M i...@linuxbox.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
I have a form with three drop down select boxes in it. I'd like the
second box to populate when an option is selected in the first, and
for the third to populate when an option is selected from the second.
In the first select
On Jan 24, 6:57 am, da644 andrewjdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have an HTML object that has been creating using some scripting and
I wish to insert this into to different locations on the page, e.g.
var newObj = createMyObject();
$('location1').insert(newObj);
On Jan 17, 12:30 am, ColinFine colin.f...@pace.com wrote:
[...]
but if you want it to be more general, you can say
getData(evt.element().up('form'))
All form controls have a form property that is a reference to the form
they are in, so why not:
getData(evt.element().form))
--
Rob
On Jan 6, 6:01 am, kidbrax braxton.be...@gmail.com wrote:
when I try the following code I get an error in IE7:
someVar = mySelect.options[mySelect.slectedIndex].readAttribute('rel')
The rel attribute is not valid for option elements, it is valid for A
and LINK elements.
It causes the
On Dec 31 2008, 12:05 am, buda www...@pochta.ru wrote:
But to store metadata in objects - is doing overjob - elements might
be added or deleted or changed their style or state - and syncronyze
elmenets state with their object mappers - is very hard and
useless
It's not hard at all, and
On Dec 29, 8:38 pm, buda www...@pochta.ru wrote:
It is useful, but I don't think it's worth the trouble and I
personally don't use it. IE's DOM is one example of what makes custom
attributes troublesome - you never know which issues you will run into
due to every custom attribute ending
On Dec 17, 8:52 pm, Craig cr...@europe.com wrote:
site im developing is not live but similar tohttp://www.aspecto.co.uk/
Is there much use in creating a slider function to run all the sliders
from would this make much of a difference?
It might make the code tidier and get rid of some global
On Dec 17, 3:13 am, Craig cr...@europe.com wrote:
I have a very graphics intense website with 4 sliders on each coded in
a serperate JS file.
Recently i have developed a full screen image viewer that behaves much
like lightbox. I am using the effects library to BlindDown the image
and
On Dec 11, 3:25 am, lskatz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I finally got around to this, and it turns out that even though the
approach is good, I cannot insert HTML tags. I chose to not use
recursion to make it simple. The problem is that it uses each
character literally and displays the
On Dec 4, 11:17 am, yoshi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
heres my js:
var stuff7=eval('function() {alert(stuff..);}')
when i alert stuff7 it is undefined.
The code passed to eval is treated at a function declaration. Without
a name, it is a syntax error.
now if i do this:
eval('var
On Nov 27, 11:32 pm, spradeepkumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
If you are particular in using this...prototype has got
bind methods with which you can control your scope
The value of a function's this keyword has nothing to do with scope,
it is set by the call.
--
Rob
On Nov 15, 6:18 am, Hector Virgen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, TJ. That's a really good point, but unfortunately many of our
clients use old Macs with IE 5.5. I would still like to provide them with
some basic Javascript UI enhancements. Does that mean I would have to write
native
On Nov 14, 9:54 am, Hector Virgen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry if this has been asked before, but is there an updated list of
browsers and versions supported by Prototype?
URL:
On Nov 14, 7:39 am, Ehsun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've create an Object in my pages script tags, something like this:
a = new A();
and when I want to call a method of a in the script which is actually
the ajax content (evaluated with .evalScripts) everything is fine. but
when the
On Nov 7, 12:24 am, T.J. Crowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Yes I know this possibility. I though about it, but I can not use
it... and I don't think the bind problem will be fix in that way ;)
I'm pretty sure it will. Did you try it? I did a trivial test, and
it worked fine.
On Nov 7, 12:52 am, Alex Mcauley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
i want it to be transparent hence the syncronous request
Blocking the UI is hardly transparent.
The lazy loading of scripts is a flawed strategy - it seems a good
idea but if you think about the issues, you should realise that you'll
On Nov 7, 5:45 am, Matt Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are the drawbacks of requestings the JS file via Ajax.Request and
stuffing the responseText inside the innerHTML property of a generated
script element?
It is not reliable across browsers, nor is assigning the source as a
string
On Nov 5, 2:58 am, jak0lantash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody.
I have some difficulties with bindAsEventListener. I'm working on a
little module system (like in netvibes, but simpler).
In the page, there are two div, kind of module, one on top, one on
bottom. With a button, I
On Oct 30, 9:46 am, solidhex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to figure out a way to zebra stripe list items in an
unordered list. The only tricky part is that I don't want to zebra
stripe the nested lists, but I want to maintain the same every other
stripping pattern on the nested
On Oct 17, 3:22 am, SWilk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
T.J. wrote a How-To on the wiki based on todays thread:
http://proto-scripty.wikidot.com/prototype:how-to-load-scripts-dynami...
I just have one question regarding the how-to:
quote
Here's the dynamic.js file:
On Oct 14, 5:07 pm, T.J. Crowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
One way to do this is to have the relevant fields tagged with a
specific CSS class.
An excellent response overall, but just for the record: the HTML class
attribute is not targeted at CSS, it is for any purpose you wish to
put
On Oct 16, 4:42 am, buda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry - maybe its not sutable forum but I dont take part in anyone
except this one
I have a textarea with wrap=hard
Wrap is not a standard attribute (i.e. it isn't part of the HTML 4.01
standard), it can't be expected to be consistent
On Oct 12, 3:29 am, Justin Perkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 10:31 AM, RobG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Performance is not the issue - fewer lines of code doesn't necessarily
mean faster performance.
Do you differentiate between browser sniffing and object/method
On Oct 12, 10:05 am, kangax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 11, 2:40 pm, RobG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 12, 3:29 am, Justin Perkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 10:31 AM, RobG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Performance is not the issue - fewer lines of code doesn't
On Oct 7, 12:22 pm, buda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for idea, there is no any way by doing it with prototype.js
nativly?
Sure, use $A to convert the returned NodeList to an array and use each
to iterate over it. As far as I know, Prototype.js doesn't wrap
getElementsByTagName - what
On Sep 12, 12:53 pm, Daniel Lopes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This not solution when you want use grids... table are not for layout,
right use is to display data, layout must be maded in divs.
That makes no sense at all. I wasn't suggesting your use of a table
is wrong, but that you use the
99 matches
Mail list logo
