All,
On Jun 17, 2008, at 7:10 PM, ext Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:45:04 +0900, Web Applications Working Group
Issue Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ISSUE-7 (Transfer Old Issues): Transferring old WebAPI and WAF
[All Products]
be
Public and give the WG two weeks to discuss/object [on Arthur
Barstow - due 2008-07-03].
Comments on the Requirements LC doc
AB: thanks Marcos for getting this out!
JS: I sent Marcos comments already
... I sent him some additional comments
... I still have some more comments to submit
Hi Sam,
This seems like a reasonable extension to me.
A colleague asks Are there any new security concerns by putting this
inside XHR, or is the assumption that we are not exposing anything new?
What are your thoughts on that question? I presume not exposing
anything new given this type
asked to do a review [on Arthur Barstow - due 2008-08-07].
Benoit: we want to use the f2f to finalize the PC spec, right?
MC: yes, that's the plan
Bryan: what level of comments are you expecting?
... thoughts and questions or detailed requiements?
MC: comments at all levels
Of Steven Faulkner
Sent: 31 July 2008 14:21
To: Arthur Barstow
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ext Marcos Caceres
Subject: Re: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last
Call
WD
The current spec states:
R37. Language Accessibility
A conforming specification must specify that the language used
Below is the agenda for the August 21 Widgets Voice Conference (VC).
Logistics:
Time: 07:00 Boston; 13:00 Paris; 20:00 Tokyo; 21:00 Brisbane
Duration = 60 minutes
Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 9231 (WAF1)
IRC channel = #wam; irc.w3.org:6665
Confidentiality of minutes =
with resolution
above [on Arthur Barstow - due 2008-09-02].
Issue #46 - Need to define a span for i18n purposes in configuration
document
AB: issue is [40]http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/46
[40] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/46
MC: the issue is that part
]
trackbot Created ACTION-227 - Close Issue #15 with the resolution
above [on Arthur Barstow - due 2008-09-03].
Issue #19 - Widgets digital Signatures spec does not meet required use
cases and requirements
AB: the issue is: [31]http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/19
[31] http://www.w3
and rationale in the 28 Aug 2008 minutes [on Arthur Barstow - due
2008-09-04].
Benoit big table and a router's fan near the phone area... sorry
scribe ACTION: David work with OMTP members to provide input on
the enabling access to proprietary APIs model [recorded in
[27]http
This issue has been closed, based on the WG's agreement on August 26.
Please see the following for details:
http://www.w3.org/2008/08/26-wam-minutes.html#item03
-Regards, Art Barstow
On Jun 26, 2008, at 4:18 AM, ext Web Applications Working Group Issue
Tracker wrote:
ISSUE-17:
This issue has been closed, based on the WG's agreement on August 28.
Please see the following for details:
http://www.w3.org/2008/08/28-wam-minutes.html#item02
-Regards, Art Barstow
On Jun 26, 2008, at 11:13 AM, ext Web Applications Working Group
Issue Tracker wrote:
ISSUE-18
This issue has been closed, based on the WG's agreement on August 26.
Please see the following for details:
http://www.w3.org/2008/08/26-wam-minutes.html#item13
-Regards, Art Barstow
On Jun 27, 2008, at 12:07 AM, ext Web Applications Working Group
Issue Tracker wrote:
ISSUE-20
This issue has been closed, based on the WG's agreement on August 26.
Please see the following for details:
http://www.w3.org/2008/08/26-wam-minutes.html#item14
-Regards, Art Barstow
On Jun 27, 2008, at 12:30 AM, ext Web Applications Working Group
Issue Tracker wrote:
ISSUE-21:
This issue has been closed, based on the WG's agreement on August 26.
Please see the following for details:
http://www.w3.org/2008/08/26-wam-minutes.html#item11
-Regards, Art Barstow
On Jul 4, 2008, at 3:46 AM, ext Thomas Roessler wrote:
My reaction is that this is local error
This issue has been closed, based on the WG's agreement on August 28.
Please see the following for details:
http://www.w3.org/2008/08/28-wam-minutes.html#item03
-Regards, Art Barstow
On Jul 3, 2008, at 11:41 PM, ext Web Applications Working Group Issue
Tracker wrote:
ISSUE-35: SVG
This issue has been closed, based on the WG's agreement on August 28.
Please see the following for details:
http://www.w3.org/2008/08/28-wam-minutes.html#item04
-Regards, Art Barstow
On Jul 4, 2008, at 12:26 AM, ext Web Applications Working Group Issue
Tracker wrote:
ISSUE-36: Is
Thanks for taking the lead on this Arun!
Since we eventually need to show we've satisfied its [=the spec's]
relevant technical requirements [1], did the Web API WG do some
related requirements work? If yes, where can we find that work?
-Regards, Art Barstow
[1]
Below is the agenda for the September 11 Widgets Voice Conference (VC).
Logistics:
Time: 07:00 Boston; 13:00 Paris; 20:00 Tokyo; 21:00 Brisbane
Duration = 60 minutes
Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 9231 (WAF1)
IRC channel = #wam; irc.w3.org:6665
Confidentiality of minutes =
Frederick, All,
As you may know, the Web Applications WG [WebApps] is working on a
Digital Signature specification for Widgets (see [Widgets] for a
definition of Widget in this context).
The FPWD of our Digital Signature spec is at [DigSig-TR] and the
latest Editor's Draft is available
Sig WG re the questions
we sent to them last week [on Arthur Barstow - due 2008-10-09].
MC: David, are you going to send us some info OMTP re the DigSig
spec?
DR: I'll follow-up with Nick
AB: Meeting Closed
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: Barstow ping the XML Sig WG re
Below is the draft agenda for the October 9 Widgets Voice Conference
(VC).
Inputs and discussion on the agenda topics before the meeting is
encouraged.
Logistics:
Time: 07:00 Boston; 13:00 Paris; 20:00 Tokyo; 21:00 Brisbane
Duration = 60 minutes
Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200,
and Events spec pub ready [recorded in
[16]http://www.w3.org/2008/10/09-wam-minutes.html#action01]
trackbot Created ACTION-254 - Talk to Mike about helping Arve
getting the API and Events spec \pub ready\ [on Arthur Barstow -
due 2008-10-16].
MikeSmith hai
MikeSmith I can deal
Below is the draft agenda for the October 16 Widgets Voice Conference
(VC).
Inputs and discussion on the agenda topics before the meeting is
encouraged.
Logistics:
Time: 07:00 Boston; 13:00 Paris; 20:00 Tokyo; 21:00 Brisbane
Duration = 60 minutes
Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200,
.
-Regards, Art Barstow
Begin forwarded message:
From: ext Jon Ferraiolo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: October 17, 2008 11:18:15 AM EDT
To: Arthur Barstow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Charles McCathieNevile [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Doug Schepers [EMAIL PROTECTED], Pollington, David,
VF
[on Arthur Barstow - due
2008-10-27].
AB: I would imagine that type of service could be included in a
Widget repository service
MC: something like this could be added to validator.nu
AB: this is Henri's service?
MC: yes, but just giving a schema isn't that helpful
... need
Carmelo for the URI of his
testing paper [on Arthur Barstow - due 2008-10-28].
Dom: once you have the testable assertions you still have to create
the content corresponding to the test case
... I expect this needs to be done by hand
MC: Yes
Dom: one way to proceed would be to automate
Marcos, All,
I agree the main follow-up is that we need to do some additional
work, particularly regarding fleshing out related requirements.
The minutes indicate there are some requirements that aren't
explicitly captured in the October 20 version of R6:
The deadline for position papers for the workshop on Security
Device API Access has been extended to November 5.
However, note there are some important details in the e-mail below
that you must follow ...
-Regards, Art Barstow
Begin forwarded message:
From: ext Marie-Claire Forgue
Based on the October 21 discussion with the XML Security WG:
http://www.w3.org/2008/10/21-wam-minutes.html#item07
The the group decided SHA-256 is required thus this issue is closed.
-Regards, Art Barstow
On Jun 27, 2008, at 2:02 AM, ext Web Applications Working Group Issue
Tracker
Barstow
Begin forwarded message:
From: ext Arthur Barstow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: November 5, 2008 2:17:12 PM EST
Subject: WebApps WG status for 7 November 2008 HCG call
WebApps' latest publication status is available at:
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/PubStatus
There have been no new
On Nov 12, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Below is the draft agenda for the October 30 Widgets Voice
Conference (VC).
Correction - the agenda is for the November 13 VC. -Regards, AB
The minutes from the November 13 Widgets voice conference are
available at the following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2008/11/13-wam-minutes.html
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webapps mail list before November 20 (the next
Below is the draft agenda for the November 20 Widgets Voice
Conference (VC).
Inputs and discussion on the agenda topics before the meeting is
encouraged.
Logistics:
Time: 07:00 Boston; 13:00 Paris; 21:00 Tokyo
Duration = 60 minutes
Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 9231
The minutes from the November 20 Widgets voice conference are
available at the following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2008/11/20-wam-minutes.html
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webapps mail list before December 4 (the next
Marcos, Stuart,
On Dec 1, 2008, at 5:29 AM, ext Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)
wrote:
From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unfortunately, widgets/zip do not maintain media-type information.
That information is derived from content-type sniffing heuristics as
defined in HTML5
Below is the draft agenda for the November 20 Widgets Voice
Conference (VC).
Two notes on this agenda:
1. NOTE the TIME CHANGE!
2. It is highly unlikely we will cover the Widgets DigSig spec or the
API and Events spec. Please review the related ACTIONs and respond
accordingly.
Inputs
Dom,
Today, during the Widgets voice conf, we briefly discussed the
location you proposed and we agreed with your proposal.
Regarding looking at the detailed test cases, Marcos reported he's
done a first pass and didn't see any issues. Realistically, I don't
believe we will do an
An FYI for Widget People (that are not subscribed to www-tag) ...
The TAG discussed the widget: scheme mechanism during their December
04 meeting. The minutes from that discussion are:
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2008/12/04-minutes.html#item04
-Regards, Art Barstow
WebApps WG members,
This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a Last Call WD of the
Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration spec.
The latest Editor's Draft is available at the following and Marcos
expect to make some minor changes in Section 8 during this 1-week
review period:
Below is the draft agenda for the December 18 Widgets Voice
Conference (VC).
Inputs and discussion on the agenda topics before the meeting is
encouraged.
Logistics:
Time: 24:00 Tokyo; 17:00 Helsinki; 16:00 Paris; 15:00 London;
10:00 Boston; 07:00 Seattle
Duration = 60 minutes
The minutes from the December 18 Widgets voice conference are
available at the following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2008/12/18-wam-minutes.html
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webapps mail list before 8 January 2009 (the
Below is the draft agenda for the January 8 Widgets Voice Conference
(VC).
Inputs and discussion on the agenda topics before the meeting is
encouraged.
Logistics:
Time: 24:00 Tokyo; 17:00 Helsinki; 16:00 Paris; 15:00 London; 10:00
Boston; 07:00 Seattle
Duration = 60 minutes
Zakim
The minutes from the January 8 Widgets voice conference are available
at the following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-wam-minutes.html
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webapps mail list before 15 January 2009 (the
Bcc: public-i18n-c...@w3.org, public-b...@w3.org, wai-xt...@w3.org,
public-m...@w3.org
Reply-to: public-webapps@w3.org (archived at [1])
The Web Applications WG [2] explicitly seeks comments from the I18N,
Mobile Web BP, Mobile Web Test Suites and WAI PF Working Groups
regarding the 22
Hi,
On Jan 13, 2009, at 11:50 AM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote:
I know some people (e.g. Ian) don't like the idea, but it seems the
name Access Control for Cross-Site Requests confuses people,
especially the Access Control part:
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2008/12/10-minutes#item03
Below is the draft agenda for the January 15 Widgets Voice Conference
(VC).
Inputs and discussion on the agenda topics before the meeting is
encouraged.
Logistics:
Time: 24:00 Tokyo; 17:00 Helsinki; 16:00 Paris; 15:00 London; 10:00
Boston; 07:00 Seattle
Duration = 60 minutes
Zakim
Below is the draft agenda for the January 22 Widgets Voice Conference
(VC).
Inputs and discussion on the agenda topics before the meeting is
encouraged.
Logistics:
Time: 24:00 Tokyo; 17:00 Helsinki; 16:00 Paris; 15:00 London;
10:00 Boston; 07:00 Seattle
Duration = 60 minutes
The minutes from the January 22 Widgets voice conference are
available at the following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2009/01/22-wam-minutes.html
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webapps mail list before 29 January 2009 (the
WebApps WG Members - this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish
the Element Traversal errata as proposed by Cameron:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JanMar/
0168.html
As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and
encouraged and silence will be
Marcos, All,
On Jan 22, 2009, at 9:16 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
In the PC spec, I would really like to drop the access element's
plugins attribute and just leave it to implementations to cope with
proprietary content types. Does anyone have a problem with this?
Given we have no related
Below is the draft agenda for the January 29 Widgets Voice Conference
(VC).
So that we can focus on comments related to the LCWD of the Widgets
Packaging and Configuration spec, the Widgets Digital Signature spec
is not included on this week's agenda.
Inputs and discussion on all of
message:
Resent-From: public-webapps@w3.org
From: ext Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
Date: January 9, 2009 1:38:51 PM EST
To: public-webapps public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: Request for Comments: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0:
Packaging Configuration spec; deadline 31 Jan 2009
Archived-At: http
The minutes from the January 29 Widgets voice conference are
available at the following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2009/01/29-wam-minutes.html
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webapps mail list before 5 February 2009
I propose the following changes to the 22 December 2008 PC LCWD [1]:
1. As currently written, the spec implies a Widget User Agent must
support [Widgets-DigSig]. I think that requirement is too strong and
must be relaxed. To address this, change the first paragraph in
Section 3.0 to:
[[
Marcos,
On Jan 31, 2009, at 8:31 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
Ok, fair enough. However, I think the words such as does not make
the assertion sound particularly definitive. I think it MUST that
widget engines support the APIs and a SHOULD that they support updates
and sigs.
New text:
A
Marcos,
On Jan 31, 2009, at 9:43 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
Hi Art,
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Arthur Barstow
art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
Does the PC spec include any normative assertions that create a
dependency
on the API Events spec? I just made a quick scan of the PC's
Marcos, All,
On Jan 31, 2009, at 8:31 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
3. Signature handling should be specified in [Widgets-DigSig],
thus, replace
all of Step 5 in section 8.2 with the following:
[[
The algorithm that describes how to process the list of signatures
created
in step 4 is
The comment period for the LCWD of the Widgets 1.0: Packaging and
Configuration spec has been extended to Feb 11.
-Regards, Art Barstow
Begin forwarded message:
From: Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
Date: January 28, 2009 3:53:35 PM EST
To: public-webapps public-webapps@w3.org
Widget People - given regrets from some key members of the Widget
group for Feb 5, we will not have a call that day.
Please submit all comments for the PC LCWD by Feb 11. The latest ED
is at:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/
Also, please continue to work on your open Actions:
Begin forwarded message:
From: ext Ian Jacobs i...@w3.org
Date: February 5, 2009 3:05:02 PM EST
To: public-device-a...@w3.org public-device-a...@w3.org
Subject: Security for Access to Device APIs from the Web: Workshop
Report Published
Archived-At:
Hi All,
The W3C's XBL2 Candidate spec [1] was published almost two years ago.
Since then, there has been some implementation activity reported
(e.g. [2],[3]) but nothing recently.
Does anyone have XBL2 implementation status they can share with us?
-Regards, Art Barstow
[1]
Marcos,
On Feb 3, 2009, at 9:15 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
The spec now reads:
[[
A user agent is a user agent that attempts to implement this
specification.
Note: The user agent described in this specification does not denote a
widget user agent at large: that is, a user agent that
Hi Marcos,
To facilitate addressing Action 293 (Add the tag: scheme to the
scheme pros and cons document), and to provide an easy way for other
members of the group to contribute to the widget scheme pros and cons
discussion, I copied your slide set to our wiki:
The minutes from the February 12 Widgets voice conference are
available at the following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2009/02/12-wam-minutes.html
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webapps mail list before 19 February 2009 (the
FYI. A summary of the Unicode Normalization issue by Addison Phillips.
Begin forwarded message:
From: ext Phillips, Addison addi...@amazon.com
Date: February 12, 2009 6:47:14 PM EST
Cc: public-i18n-c...@w3.org public-i18n-c...@w3.org
Subject: normalization issue summary for HCG
Archived-At:
The minutes from the February 19 Widgets voice conference are
available at the following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2009/02/19-wam-minutes.html
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webapps mail list before 5 March 2009 (the next
Marcos,
A few weeks ago we talked about how a widget author could add widget-
specific metadata (e.g. initial settings) to the config file [1].
I think providing a declarative means to provide this metadata is
consistent with existing Req #14 - Widget Metadata [2]. Additionally,
at least
The so-called OMTP Turin Rules can be downloaded from WebApps' wiki:
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/images/8/8b/BONDI-W3C-IPR-
Turin-Rules-v04.pdf
-Regards, Art Barstow
On Feb 23, 2009, at 4:32 AM, ext Engel-Flechsig wrote:
Dear Art,
Please find below the (revised) version 04 of the
://www.w3.org/2009/02/26-wam-minutes.html#action04]
trackbot Created ACTION-316 - Send Josh the relevant pointers to
facilitate his creating requirements for URI scheme [on Arthur
Barstow - due 2009-03-05].
AB: who from BONDI can help?
DR: I'll take this back to OMTP
scribe
The minutes from the February 25 Widgets f2f meeting are available at
the following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-wam-minutes.html
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webapps mail list before 5 March 2009 (the next
The minutes from the February 24 Widgets f2f meeting are available at
the following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2009/02/24-wam-minutes.html
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webapps mail list before 5 March 2009 (the next
WebApps WG members,
This is Call for Consensus to publish a new Working Draft of the CORS
spec (with a new cors short-name):
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/access-control/
Please respond by March 6 at the latest.
As always, positive response is preferred and encouraged and silence
will be
David,
Since many of WebApps' members are not familiar with OMTP and BONDI,
I have a some first order process-related questions regarding the
proposed Release Candidate (RC). I'll withhold other comments e.g
spec forking, fragmentation, etc. for now.
* Where can we find the process that
Below is the draft agenda for the March 5 Widgets Voice Conference (VC).
Inputs and discussion before the meeting on all of the agenda topics
via public-webapps is encouraged (as it can result in a shortened
meeting).
Logistics:
Time: 23:00 Tokyo; 16:00 Helsinki; 15:00 Paris; 14:00
The minutes from the March 5 Widgets voice conference are available
at the following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2009/03/05-wam-minutes.html
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webapps mail list before 12 March 2009 (the next
During the March 5 widgets voice conference, the group agreed [1]
this issue can be closed since the latest version of the Widgets
Digital Signature spec [2] address this issues' concerns.
-Regards, Art Barstow
[1] http://www.w3.org/2009/03/05-wam-minutes.html#item04
[2]
Mark - during the March 5 widgets voice conference we discussed this
issue that you raised [1]. Marcos created this issue from the
following e-mail thread:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JanMar/
0521.html
A couple of the people on the call asked for some more
On Mar 2, 2009, at 6:57 AM, Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote:
WebApps WG members,
This is Call for Consensus to publish a new Working Draft of the CORS
spec (with a new cors short-name):
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/access-control/
Please respond by March 6 at the latest.
As always,
Arve,
On Mar 5, 2009, at 9:14 AM, ext Arve Bersvendsen wrote:
After the last F2F in Paris, I spoke to Ian Hickson about the
Storage APIs in HTML5, and my understanding is now that his intent
is to split this part of the spec into a separate document. This
makes it much easier for us to
Bryan, Marcos, All,
Among the areas we need contributions:
* The red block issues in the specs as well as inputs to address
open actions and Issues:
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/products/8
* Widgets test suite - does BONDI have something we can use? I don't
understand how they
The Draft minutes from the DOM 3 Events Voice Conference are
available at the following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2009/03/11-webapps-minutes.html
The next D3E voice conference is 18 March.
-Regards, Art Barstow
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
Selectors fans - the CSS WG published a LCWD of the Selectors spec;
comments due April 7:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-selectors-20090310/
Begin forwarded message:
From: ext Bert Bos b...@w3.org
Date: March 11, 2009 3:05:24 PM EDT
Subject: Last Call for comments on Selectors
Marcos - I prefer your 2nd proposal. Unless contrary views are
expressed in the next few days, I recommend adding your proposal to
the ED.
-Regards, Art Barstow
On Mar 12, 2009, at 12:53 PM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
Hi,
I've decided that having the screenshots at the root of the widget
Marcos,
On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:42 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Frederick Hirsch
frederick.hir...@nokia.com wrote:
Yes, I made this change since we decided this week to have case
sensitivity.
Too bad we have to use literals in hex for this case ...
Hmmm...
Marcos, Frederick,
I should have asked Frederick to make the changes Marcos suggested
below. Sorry about that!
Anyhow, Frederick agreed to make the changes.
-Regards, Art Barstow
On Mar 17, 2009, at 8:44 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
On 3/17/09 12:59 PM, Frederick Hirsch wrote:
I
The minutes from the March 19 Widgets voice conference are available
at the following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2009/03/19-wam-minutes.html
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webapps mail list before 26 March 2009 (the next
On Mar 19, 2009, at 12:06 PM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Andrew Welch
andrew.j.we...@gmail.com wrote:
That's exactly what I was talking about when I said even thought
the XML i18n
guidelines say it's bad practice,'.
Ahh very sorry, I just saw the email
David - I was not able to submit my comments via the link you
provided below. Here is what I wanted to submit ...
Below are some comments regarding the BONDI 1.0 Release Candidate (RC).
These comments are sent as a Chair of the W3C's Web Applications
(WebApps) Working Group (WG) and do not
Marcos, Arve - although the status of the AE spec was on the agenda
of the March 19 widgets voice conference, we did not have time to get
to that item.
What is the status of the AE spec and which of the Widgets Open
Actions and Issues must be addressed before the AE spec is ready for
a
The minutes from the March 26 Widgets voice conference are available
at the following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2009/03/26-wam-minutes.html
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webapps mail list before 2 April 2009 (the next
Hi,
Where can we find: a) a short description of the otsi-arch-sec mail
list (e.g. its function); b) who is subscribed to this list and c)
its Public archive?
Also, is this mail list writable by anyone that has not agreed to the
Turin Rules [1]?
-Regards, Art Barstow
[1]
Hi,
Where can we find: a) a short description of the otsi-arch-sec mail
list (e.g. its function); b) who is subscribed to this list and c)
its Public archive?
Also, is this mail list writable by anyone that has not agreed to the
Turin Rules [1]?
-Regards, Art Barstow
[1]
All - on March 30 I attended the BONDI Steering Group's f2f meeting
in Cambridge, MA US.
In the interest of aligning our Widgets specs with BONDI, I said the
following regarding my expectations for Widgets spec publication for
the next three months. I made it clear that I spoke solely as a
Below is the draft agenda for the April 2 Widgets Voice Conference (VC).
Inputs and discussion before the meeting on all of the agenda topics
via public-webapps is encouraged (as it can result in a shortened
meeting).
Logistics: *** NOTE TIME CHANGE FOR non-US PARTICIPANTS ***
Time:
This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish the First Public
Working Draft of the specs below.
As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and
encouraged and silence will be assumed to be assent. The deadline for
comments is April 10.
-Regards, Art Barstow
Begin forwarded
Nokia supports the publication of these FPWDs. -Regards, Art Barstow
On Apr 2, 2009, at 3:59 PM, Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote:
This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish the First Public
Working Draft of the specs below.
As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and
On Apr 6, 2009, at 6:46 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
I had a discussion with Anne on IRC about using the Storage interface
and XHR [1]. He recommended that we recommend support for Storage only
on user agents that support HTML5. With regards to XHR, the same
applies: it would be a property of
On Apr 6, 2009, at 10:36 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
I would like to propose we get remove the following methods from
the AE spec:
7.17 The onbeforeupdate Callback
7.18 The onafterupdate Callback
For onbeforeupdate, there is no guarantee that the widget will be
running when an update is
During the April 2 widgets call, Frederick raised concerns about
synchronizing the Widgets DigSig spec with XML Signatures 1.1 and
Signature properties [1], given the schedule proposed in [2] which
seeks to help align our widgets specs with BONDI's use of those specs
for their 1.0 RC.
On Apr 6, 2009, at 6:46 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
I had a discussion with Anne on IRC about using the Storage interface
and XHR [1]. He recommended that we recommend support for Storage only
on user agents that support HTML5. With regards to XHR, the same
applies: it would be a property of
1 - 100 of 1565 matches
Mail list logo
