Todd Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>dave, all,
>
>> "It's ridiculous because if pigs had wings, they could fly."
>>
>> Pigs don't have wings, and qmail-smtpd can't do the lookups. You
>> either need to stop wishing your pig could fly or trade it for a bird.
>>
>
>this comment has the obv
"eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It's ridiculous because if qmail-[smtpd] could do the lookup and
>reject for invalid users, I would not have hardly any bounced
>messages.
"It's ridiculous because if pigs had wings, they could fly."
Pigs don't have wings, and qmail-smtpd can't do the lookup
"Jean-Christian Imbeault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[Mike Hodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote]
>
>>Another great resource is 'Life With Qmail' at www.lifewithqmail.org.
>
>Got that already. But as I found out it's Linux-centric. I'll be installing
>on OpenBSD and worse for me is that I don't kno
Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It is absolutely necessary.
Why can't you just run qmail-tcpok and send qmail-send an ALRM?
-Dave
"Matt Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Fairly frequently throughout an average day, my preprocessed queue will
>begin to grow steadily and not get processed. In most cases, if this is
>ignored, it resumes processing eventually. Sometimes after 15 or so minutes,
>sometimes after a couple of ho
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Russell Nelson wrote:
> Charles M. Hannum writes:
> >
> > Uhhh, did you *read* my first piece of email? If I get a VERP address
> > of `[EMAIL PROTECTED]',
> > how pray tell is my mailing list software supposed to know that the
> > mail was actually sent to `[EMAIL PROT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I have installed qmail and serialmail and everything is working.
Cool. Thanks for letting us know.
>My setup is as follows
>
>metta.lk
> __
>| | -to the InterNet.
>|__|
> |
>modem dial-up to my Internet box
> |
> |
> __
>| |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>zmailer distributes mail in our internal network using host file.
>can qmail do the same?
>
>i dont like to but internal ip:s in dns.
>
>what would be the best solution to this problem?
control/smtproutes
-Dave
"Per-fredrik Pollnow (EPK)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>But how to you do when you are using stunnel + smtpd ?
>
>This is some of the tings I have tried:
>--
>#!/bin/sh
>QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
>NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild`
>MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincomi
"Marenbach, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I just build and set up qmail for the first time (according to the
>installation description in Life with qmail) on a Solaris 5.8 box.
>
>I tried to start qmail by invoking
> qmail-start ./Mailbox splogger qmail
>and nothing at all did happen. No
"Per-fredrik Pollnow (EPK)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I have been trying this in some desperate moments to get it to work(and some other
>things) :=) :
>
>#!/bin/sh
>QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
>NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild`
>MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
>exec /usr/local/bin/
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello list, my name is Jon and I am a new convert to qmail and just wanted
>to introduce myself. I hope to get up to speed and be able to contribute to
>this list soon.
Welcome, Jon.
-Dave
Stathakopoulos Giorgos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yesterday, I came up to a strange situation:
>I was receiving thousands of bounces to
>@.
>Since is in my rcpthosts/locals file, I was accepting these
>messages. But didn't exist so these
>messages were going to postmaster.
>My mailserver had
Greg White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>You really have to try to make qmail relay. Possible sources of relay:
>
>1. control/rcpthosts empty.
>2. RELAYCLIENT set for all/wrong addresses in /etc/tcp.smtp[.cdb]
>(or wherever you keep that file) if using tcpserver
>3. RELAYCLIENT set for all addresse
"Dahnke, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>... On the numerous development and production web servers it
>is always nice to put qmail on them and I configure it with the
>./config-fast nextsource.com because receiving mailers want a fqdn when they
>receive messages from these hosts. But the etern
"Joshua Nichols" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have a box (lwq + qmail-verh basically) that runs a number of opt in
>lists. Recently, a user sent a bunch of UCE, and though that problem has
>been solved, I'd like to be able to enforce the request of those who
>complained and asked "to never rece
Al Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is there a way to get qmail to deliver email to an account that's
>not in /etc/passwd (or its shadow equivalent)?
Sure, lots of them.
>In other words, can I set up a separate database (e.g. MySQL)
>that qmail can access for account information?
Yes, there
"Xavier Pegenaute" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Please, i need that Qmail exec "procmail" for every user in mine
>system, this procmail is a little different than normal procmail,
>this one, zip all messages and store the messages in his own folder
>...
A better solution to your problem, which is
"Daniel BODEA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Can there be, in the normal flow of qmail, multiple instances of
>qmail-send running at the same time (?) because multithreaded it's
>not, and I haven't seen any locking mechanisms for the ressources
>qmail-send accesses directly.
one queue == one qmai
Martin Edlman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a maillist running on one server (majordomo/sendmail)
> and a domain mailbox for domain.com on another server
> (qmail). There are three addresses from domain.com subscribed
> to the list (eg. [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROT
Jake Roersma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I would check to see if qmail-send has a defunct process.. You will need to
>restart it or restart qmail altogether and make sure there are no stray
>proceses that may interfere. I've had multiple instances where the queue
>becomes abnormally large because
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>We we're attacked this weekend and attackers were able to crash SMTP without
>affecting any others services in the machine.
What does "crash SMTP" mean?
-Dave
"Constantine Koulis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In order to activate the AUTORESPONCE do i have to install any EXTRA
>package?
You don't *have* to install anything else, but it's not trivial to
write a good autoresponder, and Bruce Guenter's qmail-autoresponder is
nice.
-Dave
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This is the way to do it. What you could do is make a domain virtual,
>and create a couple of .qmail files to handle it. In virtual domains,
>do
>
> defaultdomain:alias-defaultdomain
>
>then have ~alias/.qmail-defaultdomain-jim, which forwards to two
[Please don't CC me.]
"David U." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At 11:38 AM 7/11/2001 -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
>>"David U." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >I would like the ability to give all clients backup mail service for 7 d
"David U." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I would like the ability to give all clients backup mail service for 7 days
>and no more then say 10 megs -- whichever comes first.
>
>Since I am just accepting mail in my rcpthosts and not delivering it
>locally to a Maildir, how can I enforce such quotas
Greg Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>b) The script would look at the domain of the intended recipient and if
> it matched maildomain.com (for example) it would then look at the
> username being sent to.
> A small(ish) text file would be kept on the mail server with a list of
> userna
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From the archives:
>
>From: Lukasz Gogolewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: hi,how to unsubcribe?
>Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Sigh. This has become such a FAQ that I'm reposting the detailed
>instructions:
>
>First, as
Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is there documentation for each qmail error message?
No.
>i.e
>
>"Unable_to_open_/var/qmail/boxes/Mailbox.user:_access_denied._(#4.2.1)"
That one's pretty descriptive, isn't it? The user running qmail-local
can't open that file, probably due to file or directo
Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm not aware of another patch for qmail doing ldap lookups - maybe
>qmail-ldap ist just to good to start coding another one ;-))
There's a PAM LDAP module, but I don't know much about it.
Theoretically, it wouldn't require any qmail patching and would
GARGIULO Eduardo INGDESI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have a problem with some messages that are not forwarded and I don't
>know why. I have the following configuration:
>
>echo admin > ~alias/.qmail-root
>echo admin > ~alias/.qmail-postmaster
>echo admin > ~alias/.qmail-mailer-daemon
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I want to store a copy of all incoming/outgoing
> mails.so as per the qmail faq i have modified extra.h
> and set the values for QUEUE_EXTRA="Tlog\0" and
> QUEUE_EXTRALEN=5.
>
> #cat /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-log
> &[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> no when i send a mail i get
"Dave Sill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>-Dave
That's bizarre. What I actually sent was:
http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#multi-rcpt
-Dave
-Dave
-Dave
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>cannot start: hath the daemon spawn no fire?
That means qmail-send was unable to talk to qmail-lspawn,
qmail-rspawn, or qmail-clean, which means that qmail-start wasn't able
to start them or they died immediately.
-Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The qmail-ldap patch contains support for a control/custombouncetext.
>
>$ cat custombouncetext
>This is a test, your message bounced.
>SSH Communications Security
>
>This will produce bounces like so:
>
>-
>Hi. This is the qmail-send program at ssh.com.
>I'm
Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Suppose the input numbers are 2 4 6 8 10 12. Suppose the hash size is
>8. Then the buckets are 2 4 6 0 2 4. Note the bad distribution.
>Suppose the hash size is 7. Then the buckers are 2 4 6 1 3 5. Note
>the good distribution.
OK, thanks, that fi
A A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Whenever my qmail server sends someone an email, the
>following line appears in the header:
>
>"Received: from mail.mydomain.com
>(old_name.mydomain.com [216.216.216.216] (may be
>forged))"
>
>However, recently I changed my server name from
>old_name.mydomain.com t
Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Once, just once I'd like to see people mis-spel my name as "Rusell".
>Just once. Why does anybody think that a trailing 'L' is optiona?
Blame Randal Schwartz...or his parents.
Or maybe this guy:
http://www.absolutearts.com/portfolios/r/russram/
-D
"Dave Sill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If the input numbers are not fairly random, then a modulo hash is not
>a choice.
Not a *good* choice.
>>Unix file system inode numbers are not truly random. Therefore, it's
>>wise to choose a prime conf-split.
BTW
Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If the input numbers are truly random, then a modulos hash will
>distribute well whether or not the hash size is prime.
>
>However, if the input numbers are not truly random, then a modulos
>hash may pick out some regularity in the input, and preferent
"Dave Sill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>--IPiIw4QAe+
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Description: message body text
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>etc.
Argh. Forgot about my Emacs' broken MIME. Here's the program:
#include
--IPiIw4QAe+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Description: message body text
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> You're right. The "hashing" used here
Chris Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>You'll never be able to install and run qmail without root access because it
>requires installing qmail-queue setuid, and it requires running various other
>programs as users other than yourself. As a regular, non-root user, you can't
>create a setuid pro
"Williams, Paul (OTS-EDH)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Does anyone have a list of the environment variables qmail-local sets up and
>what they map to?
http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#environment-variables
-Dave
Jost Krieger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I think we are spreading urban legends here.
>
>AFAIK, the primality is for double hashing in conflict resolution.
>Nothing of that kind is going on here.
You're right. The "hashing" used here is a simple modulo. From
fmtqfn.c:
i = fmt_ulong(s,id % au
"Brano Vislocky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>someone was tested qmail with SGI's XFS on Linux? Are there some possible
>problems ( as with ReiserFS ) ?
As I mentioned in the concurrent ReiserFS thread, XFS requires the
same "link sync" patch that ReiserFS requires:
http://www.jedi.claranet.fr
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The problem comes from the fact that Linux does not adhere to BSD semantics
>regarding the sync() system call. BSD semantics state that if you sync a
>file, it's data and it's metadata are synced to disc.
>
>Linux, on the other hand, syncs only the dat
"James Melliar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have a fairly standard Linux (Mandrake 8) server with Qmail on a LAN
>serving 10 Win 98 PCs. What is very odd is that when windows clients, using
>a mixture of outlook express & Outlook 2000, send mail the SMTP connection
>times out after 60 seconds.
Chris Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Actually, he won't need to do anything. smtproutes is read by every invocation
>of qmail-remote.
You're right, of course. Sorry, that was a brain fart. Momentary
qmail-rspawn/qmail-remote confusion.
-Dave
David Gartner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>| /usr/bin/perlscript
>username
That causes a loop: the second line forwards a copy to the same .qmail
file.
>Is there anyway I can remove these .qmail files and run it on a global
>level with one file?
The "defaultdelivery" parameter to qmail-start wi
"Jon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have 20 IP's on my server. Is there a way of saying :
>
>"Only assign QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-qftest if the incoming email
>is being sent to my IP address A.B.C.D".
>
>Because out of all the 20 IP's I have, I only want to filter mail coming
>though th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>put in $QMAILDIR/control/smtproutes
>
>myhost.com:notes.myhost.com
>
>make sure for the rest it is only in control/rcpthosts
>
>and SIGHUP qmail-send.
No, smtproutes is a qmail-remote control file. HUP'ing qmail-send
won't help. He'll need to completely restart qmail.
Daniel Fenert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is there some strict login length defined in qmail?
>I'm using qmail+mysql patches, and i'm transfering domains from M$ Exchange
>(which dies ones a week :) and have user with 33 character login...
I don't know diddly about qmail+mysql patches, but the s
"Erik Logan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference MX or A for that host,
>it isn't in my control/locals file, so I don't treat it as local. (#5.4.6)
>
>my control/locals file has my domain in it.
I see at least three possibilities:
1) you're wrong, it's
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Dave can probably give a more detailed answer to this, but you don't
>symbolicly link the directories into /service until you're ready to run them.
That's not how LWQ's qmailctl works. The links in /service are
permanent.
>And even then, svscan won't
Jeffrey Austin Collop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>@40003b2f84460273a1d4 delivery 134: deferral:
>Home_directory_is_sticky:_user_is_editing_his_.qmail_file._
>(#4.2.1)/
>@40003b2f84a202a82724 delivery 135: deferral:
>Home_directory_is_sticky:_user_is_editing_his_.qmail_file._
>(#4.2.1)/
>@
Chris Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>HUPing only makes qmail reread locals and virtualdomains. (And there is no
>process called "qmail," so "killall -HUP qmail" won't do anything on
>any system.)
Except possibly on Solaris:
NAME
killall - kill all active processes
SYNOPSIS
/usr/
Deslions Nicolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Thanks but it doesn't seems to work
>i think the problem maybe comes from the ":" character...
It works. I just tested it.
Did you remember to substitute the correct UID and GID in the assign
entry? I suggested:
>> +smtp:alias:aliasuid:aliasgid:/var
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I could be mistaken, but I believe this behaviour depends on the order of the
>various lines in inittab -- if you put svscan before the stuff called in the
>standard runlevels, it should work.
Hmm, that could be it. If so, it's unfortunate that DJB's d
Deslions Nicolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>i'm currently receiving a lot of virus generated messages the "To:" looks
>like : " SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "
>i've tried to discard those messages using some .qmail alias files like
>.qmail-SMTP-default , .qmail-"SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]" etc etc but non
Bernhard Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Gerrit Pape wrote
>
>> svscan should be started at boot time and never stopped until
>> shutdown. That ensures your services are always running with the
>> same (known and wanted) environment and limits.
>
>But I don't want to bypass run levels.
>
>Would
I haven't seen it mentioned here, but Sam Varshavchik (Courier's
author) benchmarked UW-IMAP and Courier-IMAP:
http://www.courier-mta.org/mbox-vs-maildir/
This pretty much debunks the claims that maildirs don't scale.
-Dave
Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>So, is Charles right?
He knows a thing or two about qmail...
>Does this indicate somebody is reattempting delivery?
Looks like it to me.
>> No "supervise" directory... Further evidence that supervise isn't
>> running.
>
>*rattles head*
>
>So... okay..
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>-
>#!/bin/sh
>QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
>NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild`
>MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
>exec /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -R -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c "$MAXSMTPD" \
>-u "$QMAILDUID" -
Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> my /var/log/maillog fills up with stuff like this:
>>
>> Jun 12 14:09:12 hotcube qmail: 992376552.411296 end msg 1005715
>> Jun 12 14:09:12 hotcube qmail: 992376552.507199 new msg 1005716
>> Jun 12 14:09:12 hotcube qmail: 992376552.507323 info msg 1005
Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Well, my logs are filling up with garbage
Garbage or log entries? Sample, please?
>(and I get that silly "file
>does not exist" error when I run qmail stat)
Sample?
-Dave
"David U." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>now I just want to know why [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwarded to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] 6000 times (until /var filled I assume) instead
>of just once. this is all via localhost, no other machines involved.
I'd look at the logs, from the beginning of the incident.
-
"Guillermo Villasana Cardoza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>actually queue-fix will do the job right... I know I have done it.
I didn't mean to imply that it wouldn't work, just that it's
preferable to use the rm/make method since it's definitive and doesn't
require downloading/installing a third-
"Niles Rowland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> So I got rid of the support forward and now support seems to be
>reiceving mail
>> fine -- but how I do clear my queue when qmail-qstat reports:
>> messages in queue: 5046
>> messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 0
>
Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Dave Sill wrote:
>>
>> Logging via splogger (syslog).
>
>Which is deprecated in LWQ, now, correct?
Yes.
>> Sure that's qmail-smtpd/log/run? Looks more like qmail-smtpd/run.
>
>D'oh!
>
>#!/bin/
Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If you're running qmail configured as per
>http://www.lifewithqmail.org, then the following commands will fix the
>problem:
>
>svc -dx /service/qmail
>setlock /service/qmail/supervise/lock sh -c
>'/var/qmail/queue/*/0/{348381,348335,348013}'
For LWQ,
Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Okay, here is what I have in /var/qmail/rc:
>
>#!/bin/sh
>
># Using splogger to send the log through syslog.
># Using procmail to deliver messages to /var/spool/mail/$USER by
>default.
>
>exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" \
>qmail-start '|preline p
Shawn Estes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>First off, Im using concurrency patch and big-todo patch (from
>qmail.org) with qmail-1.03. I've configured the conf-spawn to 400. We
>are an ISP so we are not doing any kind of mailing lists, all
>messages coming through our system are seperate messages se
Maciej Bogucki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In sendmail I can change this in sendmail.cf file.
qmail isn't Sendmail.
You could (1) modify the source to not include that info, or (2)
filter messages to strip that info, e.g. using qmail-qfilter.
-Dave
Frank Tegtmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> qmail-send/log: unable to open supervise/ok: file does not exist
>
>There is no need for qmail-send/log.
Sure there is, if you want the logging supervised.
>qmail-send starts up the logger
>by itself as g
Amanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I reassigned the "alias" user to its right group,
How did you determine which GID is right? You *must* use the GID that
was in place when qmail was compiled. Changing it requires recompiling
qmail.
>I attempted to reconfigure/reinstall qmail with no success: t
"Jon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>My company runs quite a large opt-in newsletter (around 60,000 members,
>growing by about a 1000 every few days), up to a few months ago we sent the
>newsletter by using qmail-inject for every email address on the list (which
>was slow). So we started to use the
"Kirti S. Bajwa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>... It does not matter when the
>updates are done, the management still would like to inform people, several
>times, before the system is re-booted. Just say good service. Any
>suggestions.
Tap, tap, tap. Is this thing on?
You've received several sug
"Kirti S. Bajwa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Our company has a mail server. It has RH 6.2 and Qmail 1.3 and very much
>else. This server serves to about 200 email addresses. We need to install a
>patch which will require the system to be re-booted. Therefore, we would
>like to send an email messa
J=F6rgen Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>There's been 4 similar reports of qmail-remote not behaving properly t=
o
>this list during the last month.=20
>
>http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2001/05/msg00558.=
html
>http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2001/05
Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In a mail server this fails when you get a mail which is larger than the
>available size on /var. Thus, have AT LEAST 4GB for /var, then you SHOULD be
>safe. Same goes with /home if you deliver mail locally.
You really have users sending multigigabyt
"hari_bhr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>i would like to know , what are the patches to be patch with this.
>for more secure and with out any holes
>could some one guide me what are the patches to be apply
Any patches you apply are more likely to decrease security than
improve it. (No offense inte
"Joshua Nichols" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> what is the space for /
>> what is the space for /boot
>> what is the space for /home
>> what is the space for /usr
>> what is the space for /var
>> what is the space for /swap
>> what is the space for /tmp
How 20th century...
>If you use Red Hat,
"Troy Settle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>For the last several months, I've been having some severe problems with
>qmail-remote. I've rebuilt from fresh sources and updated my system
>(FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE) several times. Nothing seems to help. You can see
>what I'm seeing at http://home.psknet.
I finally found a few spare moments to update LWQ. Sigh. Sorry it took so
long.
There are lots of minor changes, of course, but also a few bigger ones:
1) Services go under /service
2) "qmail" script is now "qmailctl"
3) Improved qmail-pop3d installation instructions
4) Links to two more tran
"Joshua Nichols" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This brings up an interesting question. If I'm sending a message to 100k
>people, but I need a unique unsubscribe link at the end, can qmail be
>convinced that it's only one message, and 100k recipients?
Not stock qmail, but Russ Nelson has such a cr
Sebastian Wain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have one domain domain.com and two machines (AAA and BBB), AAA
>receives mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and depending on the user
>forward it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in BBB.
See:
http://www.faqts.com/knowledge_base/view.phtml/aid/1832/fid/205
-Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Well, when the Qmail of Central Server send a list (for example) about
>45.000 email subscribers, the Mail Relay's servers send about of 20
>email at the same time. Its very slowly! But, when the Central Server
>finish, the qmail of Mail Relay send 500 mails at the same
Cary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>What do I need to change so it does run? When I restart the system,
>qmail-send and qmail-stmp both show up with as being managed by
>supervise,
Says who?
What Do The Logs Say? (tm)
>but you and Charles both say it is not running.
If it was running, messages
From: Gregory Neil Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: sendmail 8.11.4 and 8.12.0.Beta10 available
Sendmail, Inc., and the Sendmail Consortium announce the availability
of sendmail 8.11.4 and 8.12.0.Beta10.
8.11.4 revamps signal handling within the MTA in o
"Nate Pinchot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I apologize if this question has already been answered on this mailing list,
>but I definately did not see it in the faq.
No problem. Sometimes it's not obvious that a FAQ applies to one's
situation. What you need is either a virtual domain or a virtual
GARGIULO Eduardo INGDESI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm new to the list and new to qmail.
Welcome.
>I had allways used sendmail, but I had heared that
>qmail is better (more secure and reliable) than sendmail.
>Where can I find documentation about advantages of qmail
>over sendmail
http
"Karsten W. Rohrbach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>qmail indirectly contains instrumentation for that. it is called remote
>concurreny.
The key word there is "indirectly".
If you need direct control, concurrencyremote won't provide it.
In some applications, lowering concurrencyremote might be g
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>After a mail had been relayed to the internet, sendmail sent a receipt back
>to the sender. I can't get qmail to do that.
Hmm. So Sendmail on your relay sent a message to the sender of each
message it relayed informing them of the fact that it'd relayed the
message? And
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>In a weak moment I promised a charity that I would look into how
>difficult it would be for them to have their own web based email system.
>I guess this shouldn't be too hard but as I'm not at all technical I'm
>hoping you people can help me tell them what they need in t
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>How about if I have 500 local mailbox ? Do I need to create
>.qmail-domain-users file for each one of them ?
>And route the rest to other machine .
>
>Any better solution and how ?
The qmail-users mechanism. See:
http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#qmail-users
george <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It have some sub-directory in /ar/qmail/queue directory .But I
> don't know every directory content and meaning .
>Anyone can tele me?
See:
http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#file-structure
-Dave
Cary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>However, when I try to check the mail that was sent, it has not been
>delivered. I use bin/qmail-qstat to look a the queue, and it is growing
>bigger and bigger:
>---results of bin/qmail-qstat---
>messages in queue: 138
>messages in queue but not yet preprocessed
Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>You want to sync the clocks... qmail-pop3d won't list messages from the
>future.
Somebody refresh my memory... Why does it care?
-Dave
1 - 100 of 2022 matches
Mail list logo
