hi,
i've looked around the doc's and the net and i was not able to find sonme
good docs on mail filtering. what i want sounds simple: i want to filter
messages for one user to different folders in the maildir depending on
headers or what ever.
Matthias Henze
MH458-RIPE
MHC SoftWare GmbH
Ramy Hassan at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thought you might be interested in having your skills
certified online by Brainbench
at http://www.brainbench.com/cert/reg.jsp?vid=frnd1017637
If you want some personal feedback on your skills or
you want to show how good you are to employers, a
Brainbench
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 09:12:03AM +0200, Matthias Henze wrote:
i've looked around the doc's and the net and i was not able to find sonme
good docs on mail filtering. what i want sounds simple: i want to filter
messages for one user to different folders in the maildir depending on
Hi,
Is there a way of keeping a local copy of the RBL lists and using those
instead of trying to get it from the remote site - should this not speed
things up - I also know that the list is updated all the time - but can
some of you peoples please comment...
Thanks
Tonino
Hello,
I've searched the archives on this topic and though there are a lot of
people who have reported this issue, I have not really seen a solution yet.
I have a Linux box (Redhad 5.?) which I use as a firewall/server/NAT
machine. One ethernet card is connected to an ADSL modem and has a
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 09:12:03AM +0200, Matthias Henze wrote:
! i've looked around the doc's and the net and i was not able to find sonme
! good docs on mail filtering. what i want sounds simple: i want to filter
! messages for one user to different folders in the maildir depending on
!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I must be missing something: I want to have an alternative aliases
file to be used by a user controlling a few virtual domains.
I know how I would _use_ such a file:
$cat ~user/.qmail-default
|fastforward -d ./alternative-aliases.cdb
$
The
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 11:05:22AM +0200, Petr Novotny wrote:
! The question is: How do I _create_ such a file?
setforward appears to be the closest I've seen to doing that.
---Chris K.
--
Chris, the Young One |_ but what's a dropped message between friends?
Auckland, New Zealand
hello list
i have installed redhat linux 6.1 , with sendmail 8.9.3 from rpms
(redhat cd)
i want to remove sendmail and install qmail on this system ,
please tell me exactly how can i do this
thanks regards
Prashant Desai
OK, first - untar or install the qmail files. THEN read REMOVE.sendmail and
then if you have any further questions, ask on the list. The docs are
usually a good place to start, as 95% of these questions are answered
there...
Brett
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
Hi,
I noticed the ftp location for the updated (to 1.03) anti-spam
patches from Ras/Lionel/Lindsay doesn't allow anon access
anymore (it's a buggy wu-ftpd version ?). Anyway, can anyone
point me to a new location, update the web site, or send me a
copy ?
Thanks,
Marc
Marc J.J. ter Horst
qmail Digest 18 Jul 2000 10:00:01 - Issue 1066
Topics (messages 44855 through 44906):
special quota problem
44855 by: Patrick Müller
Re: this user has no $HOME/Maildir
44856 by: Davide Giunchi
44857 by: Jia Rong
Re: Autorespond Forward Problem
44858 by:
Hello,
I run a small internal network. All mails for the
employees are transfered through an isdn dial-up
line. I use fetchmail, qmail therefor, mails are
sent by using maildirsmtp.
Every mail-user needs an own account on this
linux router, which is not needful for the normal
work.
Now I
Has anyone anonnced some kind of problem smail--qmail cooperation ?
I can't send mail from host ruuning smail to host with qmail.
Other host running sendmail, exim, qmail can talk to this qmail box.
Also my smail is runinig more then 1 year and I notice no problem with
sending mail to other
read LWQ - http://web.infoave.net/~dsill/lwq.html
follow installation instruction to the letter
and read some docs, i found out that if you read all the docs, and know
exactly what you want to do, ie what configuration you need, you will be
successfull in understanding the install
This question is for those of you who use qmail and vpopmail to handle
virtual domains. I would like to get some information on how many
virtual domains on one box you have and if you also provide web services
off of the same box. I am trying to prevent loading down my server
too much and
urgent help needed, thanks in advanced!:)
how to use imap+qmail(no sendmail) if
there is no account in imap server?
error log:
Jul 18 19:16:51 imap qmail: 963919011.320736 delivery 30:
failure: Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)/
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone could help with this error. Our mailservers have
a high mail rate and I am new to qmail (SIGH, another newbie).
Config: smtp store - queue the mail for clients then upon reciept of a
dequeue request, smtp push the mail to the clients remote mail server.
the
The qtools package includes utilities for filtering messages and
conditionally writing messages to a Maildir. For more information,
see:
http://www.superscript.com/qtools/intro.html
Regards,
W.
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 09:12:03AM +0200, Matthias Henze wrote:
i've looked around the doc's and
Tonino,
The RBL uses DNS, so if your DNS server is local then it is caching copies
of the RBL list locally.
Henry
TAG wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way of keeping a local copy of the RBL lists and using those
instead of trying to get it from the remote site - should this not speed
things up - I
Henry Baragar wrote:
Tonino,
The RBL uses DNS, so if your DNS server is local then it is caching copies
of the RBL list locally.
Henry
TAG wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way of keeping a local copy of the RBL lists and using those
instead of trying to get it from the remote site -
Tonino,
I think I spoke too soon (only on my first cup of coffee)... Specific entries
will have been cached if they have been seen before, but not necessarily the
whole list. However, you can use DNS to get the complete list: see
http://maps.vix.com/rbl/usage.html.
Henry
Henry Baragar
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 01:08:36AM -0700,
Doug Oucharek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I've searched the archives on this topic and though there are a lot of
people who have reported this issue, I have not really seen a solution yet.
I have a Linux box (Redhad 5.?) which I use as a
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 12:04:59PM +0200,
TAG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way of keeping a local copy of the RBL lists and using those
instead of trying to get it from the remote site - should this not speed
things up - I also know that the list is updated all the time - but can
hi,
thanks for the feedback. after having a closer look i've discoverd that i
do not need to know how to filter messages with qmail but how to filter
messages at user level with qmail in conjuction vpopmail - any suggestions ?
Matthias Henze
MH458-RIPE
MHC SoftWare GmbH voice:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 01:08:36AM -0700, Doug Oucharek wrote:
...
I've got Qmail running just great for both SMTP and POP!! However, as soon
as I activate my firewall (using ipchains), sending or receiving email from
a local machine takes over 3 minutes!!
In the archives, some people have
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 08:49:48AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
! There are ways to get complete copies of some other RBL styled lists.
Indeed. DJB himself said as much on the dns list:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?m=95836494819286
---Chris K.
--
Chris, the Young One |_ but what's a
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 11:05:22AM +0200, Petr Novotny wrote:
I must be missing something: I want to have an alternative aliases
file to be used by a user controlling a few virtual domains.
Yup.
I know how I would _use_ such a file:
$cat ~user/.qmail-default
|fastforward -d
I did some benchmarking using a standard 7200 RPM disk and a 128MB ramdisk.
The machine was not using any swap, so there was no chance of the ramdisk
accidentally making it to disk.
In short, performance on it sucked. The throughput was about 10% less than
IDE, but seeks/sec were 5-10 times
On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Bruce Guenter wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 05:23:12PM +0200, Olivier M. wrote:
[snip]
- suggestion : I really miss this feature from vacation in your autoresponder:
If the string $SUBJECT appears in the .vacation.msg file,
it is replaced with
No, RBL onlt requires that you do that if you want certian levels of
filtering (namely DNS).
uscpi-tcp-88 has RBL built in.. www.qmail.org
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph 570-628-5303
Fax 570-628-5545
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at
Are there any downsides to using the Netscape Messenger progress patch?
In other words, does it violate the standards in such a way as to
potentially break any other clients?
Reminder of what patch does:
replaces "okay();" in qmail-pop3d.c with
puts("+OK ");
Since ipchains is a not really a firewall but a packet filter, you need to
make sure you have the line:
ipchains -A input -s 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 -d your public IP/255.255.255.255 -p
6 -j ACCEPT ! -y
Make sure your firewall also accepts all packets from 192.168.1.0/24 also.
Ipchains configs are sorta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18 Jul 00, at 10:54, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
Are there any downsides to using the Netscape Messenger progress
patch?
You're supporting broken technology.
In other words, does it violate the standards in such a way as
to potentially break
hello,
i try to install Qmail, but i have a problem when i launch the script
svscan before launching qmail
Multilog: ...can't acces to the directories /var/log/qmail/qmail-send
Multilog: ...can't acces to the directories /var/log/qmail/qmail-smtpd
this error print infinite messages on the term
What if you put the 2 Gb RAM in the box, but let Linux use it as a disk cache?
I'm not sure how the disk caching under Linux works, but if you create a file
and then delete it before it actually gets written to disk, is there any disk
activity required?
Sure, the disks will be thrashing
"Hubbard, David" wrote:
know what you're getting into on the Dell boxes if you choose
to run linux. I've got a Dell PE2400 dual that runs linux
and you're going to be at the mercy of Dell and Adaptec on
when you upgrade your kernel because they have some sorry
proprietary drivers for their
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 10:44:49AM -0400,
Paul Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, RBL onlt requires that you do that if you want certian levels of
filtering (namely DNS).
uscpi-tcp-88 has RBL built in.. www.qmail.org
But this program does a remote lookup each time. The original question
Nothing wrong with 100% CPU usage. It just means that the kernel was able to
soak the CPU with work ... which is good. Maxing out your performance on a RAM
disk at 75% CPU usage means your system has a problem somewhere.
As for performance though, I'd be interested in seeing the actual numbers
The part I was zeroing in on was that you needed to sign a waiver to use
the RBL. That is incorrect. You need to sign a waiver if you get the
zone file via DNS zone transfers.
I'm using RBL now and didn't sign a thing but I don't use the zone
file.
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
[EMAIL
If you use a caching nameserver, frequent domains will automatically be
cached for a given amount of time. If you read the entire website for the
RBL (or other related lists) you'll find that they have subscription options
... basically you'd set yourself up as a slave server that downloads the
As for performance though, I'd be interested in seeing the actual numbers
from
the ramdisk test to check against my 10k RPM disk stats.
I used bonnie++ to test it. I'll post the results sometime today, when I
get some time.
Jay
-Original Message-
From: Michael T. Babcock [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi,
I run a qmail server and I want know the total number of bytes sent
trought it, y use qmailanalog 0.70 and gawk 3.0.4, but instead of show the
total bytes in completes messages show a nunmber like this 1.983e+10, I
tried use gawk and mawk, the server is a Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 on a PII
450,
This was the solution!! When I allowed access to the DNS port (53), I
specified destination only (-d 0/0). Adding another rule for the source did
the trick!! Thanks big time!
Doug
From: "Aijaz A. Ansari" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 09:07:47 -0500
To: Doug Oucharek [EMAIL
Petr Novotny writes:
Well, yeah. "+OK" field is mandatory, the rest is optional and can
be anything. Netscape is brain-dead to parse the comment and try
to make anything of it.
Yup. This is 100% Netscape brain damage. They can and should have
gotten the information from a different
Hi all:
now i have a problem when install sqwebmail,
I use vpopmail+mysql+sqwebmail,and have installed vopopmail4.8.4+mysql. i think it is
ok.
then there is some problem when i install sqwebmail0.37.
i run ./configure --enalbe-authvchkpw --without-authpam
--without-authuserdb
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 10:42:35AM -0400, Thomas Erskine wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Bruce Guenter wrote:
Sounds reasonable. I had been thinking of some way of putting the
original subject into the response. The other way I was thinking of
doing it would be a command-line option to add
Is UTIME necessary in a mail queue? If a logging filesystem were mounted on a
separate disk (or network array, etc.) specifically for the mail queue,
shouldn't it be mounted without UTIME?
Bruce Guenter wrote:
The only way to get truely zero seek performance is to use a
log-structured file
Does anyone know if this behaviour persists in Mozilla?
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org
Russell Nelson wrote:
Petr Novotny writes:
Well, yeah. "+OK" field is mandatory, the rest is optional and can
be anything. Netscape is brain-dead to parse the comment and try
to make anything of it.
Is awk perhaps using an output format that uses scientific notation when the
number (mbytes) is too large? Should you change "print mbytes" to "printf
("%d", mbytes)" ???
Moragues Ramón, Antonio wrote:
Hi,
I run a qmail server and I want know the total number of bytes sent
trought it, y
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 01:25:36PM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
Is UTIME necessary in a mail queue? If a logging filesystem were mounted on a
separate disk (or network array, etc.) specifically for the mail queue,
shouldn't it be mounted without UTIME?
You cannot mount without mtime (I
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 01:25:36PM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
Is UTIME necessary in a mail queue? If a logging filesystem were mounted on a
separate disk (or network array, etc.) specifically for the mail queue,
shouldn't it be mounted without UTIME?
Do you mean atime or mtime? In
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 01:14:06PM -0400, Thomas Erskine wrote:
The original sender gets added as a "To:" line, the date is
auto-generated as is the message-id, and the original recipient can be
emulated by putting a "From:" line and "Return-Path:" into the message
file. Why in the world
Hi
I have got following problem: QMail doesn't deliver mail. This error is written
in /var/log/mail every 10 seconds:
Jul 18 18:43:18 serverbox qmail: 963938598.822295 alert: unable to opendir
todo, sleeping...
Jul 18 18:43:28 serverbox qmail: 963938608.832287 alert: unable to opendir
todo,
To be honest, I'm not aware of being able to disable UTIME either, although NOATIME
is an option on Linux as well. I asked because it occured to me that this meta data
is not terribly useful to mail servers (as the times necessary are stored in the
data files themselves). Being able to shut
Yes, sorry ... utime.
But as I said in the other message ... it would be nice.
Bruce Guenter wrote:
You cannot mount without mtime (I misspelt it -- utime is the syscall)
AFAIK. You can mount without atime (access time). mtime is changed
every time the file is modified. ctime is changed
Audouy Jérôme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i try to install Qmail, but i have a problem when i launch the script
svscan before launching qmail
Multilog: ...can't acces to the directories /var/log/qmail/qmail-send
Multilog: ...can't acces to the directories /var/log/qmail/qmail-smtpd
this error
Hello all,
I was wondering if I could get some help with a small problem I have.
I have configured my qmail, and it is running fine. I have made sure that
it is not an open relay, but I found one small glitch that I would like to fix.
I have been successful stopping relaying to outside hosts
Quoting Robert Spraggs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I have been successful stopping relaying to outside hosts using tcpserver,
but any message starting with a Message ID can be delivered to an
Do you mean anything with a null return path? qmail doesn't give a
whit what's in the message-id, nor
I have been put on the RSS and ORBS list because this test keeps failing:
MAIL FROM:spamtest@[199.175.103.1]
250 ok
RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[199.175.103.1]
250 ok
DATA
354 go ahead
(message body)
250 ok 962278341 qp 3683
You don't get added to ORBS unless they receive a relayed mail back from you.
In addition, you don't get added to RSS unless someone has forwarded them a
piece of UCE which has been relayed through your server. So you have some
sort of problem or misconfiguration besides what you have pasted
I know. I had a misconfiguration problem earlier, and I am trying to
rectify the situation. I was wondering if it was possible to setup the
qmail so I do not have this problem in the future. I figure that if I
disable that feature in the qmail, then I should knock out about 99% of the
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 12:34:27PM -0700, Robert Spraggs wrote:
I know. I had a misconfiguration problem earlier, and I am trying to
rectify the situation. I was wondering if it was possible to setup the
qmail so I do not have this problem in the future. I figure that if I
disable that
But why does qmail allow for this type of address to be accepted as ok?
RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[199.175.103.1]
What normal use would there be for such a message construct?
I'm sorry for the questions, but I need to make sure that I will not be
used as a relay again, and I would like to
What is the easiest way to acomplish this forwarding in qmail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
@gemal.dk - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do I really have to have 5 .qmail files???
Quoting Robert Spraggs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I am using the out-of-the-box configuration of qmail 1.0.3.
Jul 11 13:43:10 noif qmail: 963348190.748946 info msg 2654625: bytes 1426
from qp 17024 uid 7774
Jul 11 13:43:10 noif qmail: 963348190.760341 starting delivery 9163: msg
2654625 to
Quoting Robert Spraggs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
But why does qmail allow for this type of address to be accepted as ok?
RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[199.175.103.1]
What normal use would there be for such a message construct?
Back in the day with sendmaul, this would send a message to
[EMAIL
Unfortunately I do not have the tcpserver logfiles. The tcp.smtp error is
my bad typing again. As for not giving you the rest, I'm a lazy typer as
well, I only gave you the last lines. sorry.
I was thinking( I know a dangerous concept :-) ) would putting the
following in the tcp.smtp.cbd
Hi,
this is an old problem.
Apply the SPAMCONTROL patch
http://www.fehcom.de/qmail_en.html
and put "spamtest*" in badmailpatterns.
That'll do.
cheers.
eh.
At 12:27 18.7.2000 -0700, Robert Spraggs wrote:
I have been put on the RSS and ORBS list because this test keeps failing:
MAIL
Hi,
I got real confused about reading many different sources about how to setup
and configure Qmail, but can't solve my problem at all:
I need to run several different mail domains on one machine, but any one with
different user accounts.
Sample:
mail.one.com(users A, B, C)
This evening I attempted to bring up my companys qmail server. Things are
not going well.
I installed these packages
checkpassword-0.81
daemontools-0.70
qmail-1.03
ucspi-tcp-0.88
I am starting POP in a different way. I created a
/var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/run file like this:
#!/bin/sh
From: Tony Campisi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R 0 pop3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup
Shouldn't that be
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R 0 pop-3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup
? Notice the dash in the name of the service.
Armando
According to /etc/services on a FreeBSD box...
# Updated from RFC 1700, ``Assigned Numbers'' (October 1994). All ports
# are included.
pop2109/tcppostoffice #Post Office Protocol - Version 2
pop3110/tcp#Post Office Protocol - Version 3
pop3s 995/tcp
From: Gavin Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
According to /etc/services on a FreeBSD box...
# Updated from RFC 1700, ``Assigned Numbers'' (October 1994). All ports
# are included.
pop2109/tcppostoffice #Post Office Protocol - Version 2
pop3110/tcp#Post Office
From: Tony Campisi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R 0 pop3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup
Shouldn't that be
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R 0 pop-3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup
? Notice the dash in the name of the service.
In my /etc/services file it says:
pop3
From: Tony Campisi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks guys for answering. Armando, I'm gonna try to write 110 instead of
pop3 or pop-3 next time.
No prob.
May I suggest you keep sendmail up and run the smtp and pop services on
other ports for testing purposes?
Armando
Hi guys
I installed qmail on a local machine last night and i am trying to process
my mails using procmail.
I have added | preline procmail in my ~user/.qmail file
When the the new mail arrives procmail is spawned and the mail is processed
and sento the appropriate folder
However everyone who has
Hello
everyone.
Now my qmail pill up too many mails in smtp queue.
How to delete these mails,
so that can let new mails can be send out?
Thanks.
Sincerely yours,
David
00-7-19 9:17:29
Version 0.91 of qmail-autoresponder is now available at:
http://em.ca/~bruceg/qmail-autoresponder/
See the documentation there for more details,
or join the mailing list by sending an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Development versions of qmail-autoresponder are available via
Henrik Gemal writes:
What is the easiest way to acomplish this forwarding in qmail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
@gemal.dk - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do I really
80 matches
Mail list logo
