64-bit box, so I can test both 64-bit 32-bit builds.
Dan McAllister
IT4SOHO
On 6/8/2011 6:40 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Just an FYI, COS6 is scheduled to be rolling out to mirrors this
coming Sunday 6/12, which means it should be available for download on
Monday. Anyone planning to do a QMT
I'm certainly no fan of Outlook... but there is no bug causing the
Drafts, Sent Trash folders not to show -- they're simply not there to
begin with. Allow me to explain:
_*When you create a new user via *~vpopmail/bin/vadduser*, ONLY the
INBOX maildir is created... no trash, no sent, no
Tim,
I think your problem is different from what you've read on the other
forums... specifically, I suspect that they wanted to have the system
attached to both IP addresses (both ISPs), but have QMail use only
one THAT requires a patch.
What you're proposing is that you have 2 IP
Just an FYI --
I have successfully installed QMT (although not QTP) onto CentOS 6
64-bit. However, I did have to manually build the ezmlm package because
the gcc-compat-32 package isn't available for CentOS 6 (only
compat-34)... never the less, with a little tweaking of the
dependencies, I
As I previously posted, I was successful at installing the QMT using the
install script -- with one problem that had to be resolved manually.
The problem was the ezmlm-toaster package would fail dependencies for
the gcc-compat32 libraries (which are not available for CentOS-6)... so
I winged
the usual 32-bits?
Just an opinion, but if you're running 32-bit CentOS on 32-bit hardware,
you should stay with CentOS 5.6 for a while... it's scheduled to remain
under full support until March 2014, and extended support for 3 more
years after that. By that time, you should be upgraded to
You have only specified yourself as a recolving DNS server... and the
configuration you have shown does not permit anyone (including yourself)
to do recursion... thus, you will resolve domains for which you are a
master server for, but nothing else (which is the RIGHT configuration
for the
Greetings QMailers...
I have a client who's hopping mad because his Trash folder is being
cleaned out periodically he clearly does not want this to happen.
He reports that this is happening on his system and a colleagues, but
not everyone on the domain.
I suspect his Thunderbird client is
On 8/22/2011 11:22 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 08/22/2011 08:04 AM, Maxwell Smart wrote:
On 08/22/2011 07:31 AM, Dan McAllister wrote:
Greetings QMailers...
I have a client who's hopping mad because his Trash folder is being
cleaned out periodically he clearly does not want this to happen
/phone, and prevents years worth of their porn links from piling
up on my server...
Any, keep looking. You'll find they both have second mail clients somewhere
that are deleting the trash.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Dan McAllister [mailto:d...@it4soho.com]
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011
Please excuse me if I'm Johnny Come Lately on this -- and I'll admit
from the start that I haven't read the entire thread...
BUT... requiring SSL/TLS on an SMTP port (25, 587, or 465) is quite easy
in QMT... just edit the appropriate RUN file.
Also, the use of port 465 isn't really
Scott,
1) I'm sure you're getting a LOT of read message receipts... be careful
when posting something to a list like this and asking for a read-receipt
-- you'll certainly get a lot of them!
2) I think your best bet is to set your QMT to FORWARD messages for your
domain to the new
Just to be clear: QMail isn't dependent on PHP, some of the tools
included in the toaster are... like qmailadmin (the web page GUI for
configuring users, etc.) SquirrelMail (the web interface for users to
read mail)...
Seeing a pattern? The web-based tools use PHP -- and were developed many
behavior and
dependencies that makes the whole scheme not work consistently?
3) Is there something else I'm missing...
Thanks in advance...
Dan McAllister
IT4SOHO
-timers have slow-brain days! :-)
Thanks for reading anyways!
Dan McAllister
IT4SOHO
On 10/27/2011 10:01 AM, Dan McAllister wrote:
Greetings QMailers --
I have been getting reports from multiple users that they are getting
errors on occasion while sending to our servers. (One server of 3
, ONE of
the reasons)
Dan McAllister
IT4SOHO
On 12/15/2011 12:44 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 12/15/2011 01:28 AM, Christian wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:30:06 -0700 Eric Shuberte...@shubes.net wrote
On 12/14/2011 03:47 PM, Christian wrote:
Hi,
Just a small question: if I want that all
) OPTIONALLY:
If you're UNLIKE like me and you trust users NOT to be the SOURCE
of SPAM, then you can remove any SPAMDYKE or SPAMASSASSIN processing you
may have configured for your standard (open) SMTP port
I hope this helps!
Dan McAllister
IT4SOHO
On 1/20/2012 12:09 PM, Kalil Costa
Eric, et. al:
The same *qmail-smtp* program (different instances) listens on all 3
ports (if you have them configured) - the controlling features are:
1) the port number listed on the exec line (25, 587, 465 are the
most common)
2) the status of the REQUIRE_AUTH environment variable (undef
There are many fundamental issues with Internet Mail -- we've (as a
community) been grappling with them for decades now. The fact that users
CAN submit SMTP messages (to be relayed elsewhere) is 1/2 of the
function of an MTA as defined in the ORIGINAL spec (ca. 1980)... The
fact that
The problem with RFC 6409 (and many others that have been dismissed or
didn't work out very well) is that we have to remain backwards
compatible. The Internet Community is no longer a group of some 50
system administrators who can simply decide amongst themselves to apply
some patch to SMTP to
of encryption technologies and IP), that we'll
eventually sunset some of the older encryption methods -- but I would
also hazard a guess (knowing how the Internet Community moves on these
things) that it'll be a long time before we get consensus to do so.
Dan McAllister
IT4SOHO
On 1/20/2012 4:54 PM, Eric
port
465. Is it the correct way ?
thks again Dan.
Em 20-01-2012 15:41, Dan McAllister escreveu:
Kalil (aka: Kalz):
Port 587 ususlly does NOT force the use of SSL/TLS -- the port is
defined as a submission port and is most often used as a
replacement for SMTP in environments
The most common reason for this error is that the pop3 server isn't
being given enough RAM when it starts up to be able to run the
SSL/TLS encryption/decryption.
CD into your /var/qmail/supervise/pop3-ssl/ folder and edit the file
named run.
You'll see a
To be honest, this is akin to asking which Linux Distro is best... ask
100 people, and get 102 different answers!
I used Xen in CentOS 5, and now use KVM in CentOS 6 (yes, I like CentOS
better than the more popular Debian-based distros).
I found little difficulty in migrating from my
255
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.17194 (%build)
RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.17194 (%build)
I included everything after the last make ... hopefully there is enough
to help you to point me to what's breaking...
Thanks in advance!
Dan
6.2 yesterday and everything is back to normal. (As a side
benefit, they're also running Samba 3.5 - so they're ready for Windows 7
(when they finally are willing pay for new systems in 2020!)
Dan
IT4SOHO
On 1/30/2012 6:14 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 01/30/2012 01:14 PM, Dan McAllister wrote
If you want bleeding edge support for packages, you shouldn't be
running CentOS because that runs counter to the very principles of that
Linux Distribution.
Pick Ubuntu, Fedora, or another frequently updated release - but be
aware that constant updates means constant repair of new mis-matches
mad that their AV didn't
protect them... sigh
Really people, if we assume that every hit on a SPAM blocker or
AntiVirus is a false positive, then why run one at all?
Dan McAllister
IT4SOHO
On 2/7/2012 11:01 AM, Bharath Chari wrote:
On Tuesday 07 February 2012 04:19 PM, Peter Peltonen
QTP is distributed as binary packages... thus, for CentOS issue:
sudo yum update qmailtoaster-plus
You should get the latest version (0.3.2-1.4.17)
Dan McAllister
IT4SOHO
On 2/10/2012 2:11 PM, Joel Eddy wrote:
Eric,
For those of us that will surely ask. How do we upgrade qmailtoaster
) and DNS/DHCP/Auth systems...
Just my 2-cents worth...
Dan McAllister
IT4SOHO
PS: I use Ubuntu 10.4 LTS as a desktop on old laptops -- other than HD
media (where they just don't have enough horsepower) and some Windoze
Media (where there just aren't codecs that I can find), these little
laptops do
I know I'm johnny-come-lately on this one, but have you checked to make
sure your filesystem (whichever one holds /tmp) isn't full?
I tend to get these errors when I've accidentally let /var (which is the
home of /var/tmp -- which is the target of my sym-link /tmp) get full
Dan
IT4SOHO
Domain Aliasing will indeed result in the messages for domainA and its
alias, domainB, being placed in the same mailbox...
But nothing in the message handling affects the TO: field, so it will be
very east to see which address the message was sent to -- look in the
header!
Sometimes we
I have not used the migrationwiz.com product before, but I can tell you
this:
1) If you have a cleartext copy of the user (e-mail addresses of their
mailbox) and password information, that can easily be scripted into the
vpopmail/bin/vadduser command to automagically (via script) add the
On 3/2/2012 9:37 AM, Bharath Chari wrote:
On Friday 02 March 2012 07:45 PM, rajeshrudramani wrote:
Hi,
In qmail single user when touches 2GB mail box size was
showing IMAP error(but user didn't have quota restriction) . For many
user getting this error in webmail.
Let's be
Russ,
The easy fix is to disable chkuser... you can do this in the tcp.smtp
file -- just don't forget to do the _*qmailctl cbd *_command when you're
done editing the file...
Never seen it crap out on a hyphen before, but there are other
non-standard (but legal) characters in names that
You really shouldn't hijack the thread with a new question...
But as I just wrote to another user, the easy fix is to disable
chkuser... you can do this in the tcp.smtp file -- just don't forget to
do the _*qmailctl cbd *_command when you're done editing the file...
This is a common issue
Scott,
I chose to implement my backup mail servers as essentially exact
duplicates to my main mail server, with the exception of the smtproutes
entries (and the lack of a fully populated mysql database)... so I
currently DO run spamdyke against all inbound mail on my backup MX
systems...
work, there are
several of us here more than willing to help.
Thanks for reading, and thanks even more for at least considering
becoming an infrastructure volunteer for QMT!
Best Regards,
Dan McAllister
IT4SOHO
PS: When you reply, please make sure that your note is addressed to
/*q
, that's a great lead in to my offsite backup solutions... :-)
Seriously though, when my clients are hiring me for consulting work, I
ALWAYS recommend IMAP for the safety of their data!
Just my thoughts... remember what you paid for them before complaining! :-)
Dan McAllister
--
IT4SOHO, LLC
On 3/19/2012 1:10 PM, Délsio Cabá wrote:
Hi,
I only do backup once a week :( and the backups are local to another NAS
As for the IMAP I must agreed that it's safer since they benefit from
the backups of the server.
But there is a downside: As time goes on the user will have a larger
Shortcutting all of the permissions issues, if you have an e-mail
account that is to be shared, why not just use one mailbox that multiple
people can access with IMAP?
There is no limit to the number of users who can be logged into a
single IMAP account -- I do this all the time for bosses
COS6 install (and
it supports both x86 and x64 installations).
/*As such -- please report any problems or bugs directly to me --
_OFF-LIST_*/ -- at qmt.it4soho.com.
I hope you find it useful
Dan McAllister
--
IT4SOHO, LLC
PO Box 507
St. Petersburg, FL 33731-0507
CALL TOLL FREE:
877
the Drafts and Sent
Items get stored... but if you're using 2003, you're outta luck...
Personally, I tired of Microsoft's unwillingness to properly implement
IMAP, so I switched to Thunderbird.
Dan McAllister
On 3/23/2012 7:01 AM, rajeshrudramani wrote:
Hi all,
I configured
(and if
you're using CentOS 6, pretend [in the --with] that you're using CentOS 5!)
I hope this helps!
Dan McAllister
IT4SOHO
--
IT4SOHO, LLC
PO Box 507
St. Petersburg, FL 33731-0507
CALL TOLL FREE:
877-IT4SOHO
We have support plans for QMail!
is a hardware RAID-10 array (which
is a striped mirror)... and I personally only use those for EXTREMELY
large RAID-1 arrays!
OK... so this is the end of my RAID tutorial... I hope you learned
something! :-)
Dan McAllister
IT4SOHO
PS: I learned all of this when I worked as a management
On 4/2/2012 8:06 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 04/02/2012 02:55 PM, Dan McAllister wrote:
From an earlier post:
Of course your hardware configuration can make a difference too. You
mentioned 2x2TB drives. I hope you have them configured as raid-1
mirrors (software raid should do fine
to...
Cheers!
Dan McAllister
IT4SOHO
--
IT4SOHO, LLC
PO Box 507
St. Petersburg, FL 33731-0507
CALL TOLL FREE:
877-IT4SOHO
We have support plans for QMail!
On 4/3/2012 11:55 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 04/03/2012 08:48 AM, Dan McAllister wrote:
You are absolutely correct... if you're striping (as in RAID-10), then
you cannot plug it into a standard SATA controller (BTW: The same
goes for SW RAID -- you cannot take striped volumes and just plug
On 4/3/2012 1:43 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
That doesn't really answer my question. You said you cannot take
striped volumes and just plug them in elsewhere unless you do a LOT of
things right.
In a simple SW raid-10, let's say you have a1,a2,b1,b2 members (a/b
being the mirrors, 1/2 being the
On 4/3/2012 4:21 PM, Helmut Fritz wrote:
Personally I would recommend SW raid. With the CPU's available nowadays the
cpu overhead for even a raid 5 is insignificant. There are a lot more how
to's on sw raid implementation and recovery for linux than there are for hw
raid, and by the time you
addresses (# and lines
only!), and if it's writable by anyone other than the owner, qmail-local
will not process it at all...
That should about cover your .qmail behaviors! :-)
I hope this helped!
Dan McAllister
--
IT4SOHO, LLC
PO Box 507
St. Petersburg, FL 33731-0507
CALL TOLL FREE:
877
the search
on your own (exact) OS version, and you'll likely get a plethora of
useful answers.
Good Luck!
Dan McAllister
On 4/19/2012 3:01 AM, rajeshrudramani wrote:
Hi,
Can't able to change timezone to CST.
Regards,
Rajesh
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Pak Ogah pako
!
Dan McAllister
On 4/30/2012 3:16 PM, Giuseppe Perna wrote:
thanks Pak Ogah for you replay.
where can I find documentation on qmailtoaster to install centos 6.2?
This link is valid for centos 6.2?
http://www.qmailtoaster.com/distro/info/EZ-QmailToaster-Install.txt
thanks
--
IT4SOHO
is POOR
So you'll see that I agree with David and Eric on some of these
points... and I know we differ on others... that's what opinions are all
about!
Dan McAllister
IT4SOHO
On 5/16/2012 7:58 AM, David Milholen wrote:
As a standard and when possible I like to do raid1 just for failover
I used to be a fan of ADAPTEC RAID, but TWICE I had an issue where a
RAID1 mirror recovered from the wrong disk, thus erasing TONS of data
that had to be recovered from backups (archives, to be more
language-correct). In both cases, ADAPTEC admitted that it was a flaw in
their firmware that
into the
I've always done it that way trap!)
Dan McAllister
IT4SOHO
On 5/16/2012 12:31 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Let's be clear, that raid is *not* a backup solution. The purpose of
raid is to keep the system running in the event of a hard drive
failure. Sort of like a UPS does for power. You still
to be a part of!
Best Regards,
Dan McAllister
--
IT4SOHO, LLC
PO Box 507
St. Petersburg, FL 33731-0507
CALL TOLL FREE:
877-IT4SOHO
We have support plans for QMail!
On 7/9/2012 5:50 PM, Mailinglists wrote:
What's the current status on using php 5.3 with a toaster? Safe to do so?
D
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail:
on the connections.
Personally, to avoid the it works on my laptop at Starbucks, but not at
home issues, I always configure IMAP connections to use ports 993 465.
Good luck!
Dan McAllister
On 7/17/2012 11:13 AM, Mahesh Bhat wrote:
Hi Guys,
I am not able to setup a smtp when I am outside the network
-mail q...@it4soho.com, NOT the list address) and I'll
address the issue ASAP.
Thanks,
Dan McAllister
QMT DNS/Mirror Admin
--
IT4SOHO, LLC
PO Box 507
St. Petersburg, FL 33731-0507
CALL TOLL FREE:
877-IT4SOHO
We have support plans for QMail
know
the error or other output you experienced...
Thanks,
Dan McAllister
On 7/23/2012 9:59 PM, Amit wrote:
Hi Dan,
I tried QMT-CentOS6.sh script from mirror4, but it didn't update the ClamAV.
--Amit
--
IT4SOHO, LLC
PO Box 507
St. Petersburg, FL 33731-0507
CALL TOLL FREE:
877-IT4SOHO
Amit,
I suspect chkuser is choking on the presence of the = characters
in the mail address...
Dan
On 7/27/2012 3:23 AM, Amit wrote:
Hi,
Im using QMT to scan and forward
Tony,
I just ran my mirror-check script and all of the current mirrors are
showing the correct files except for Alex in the UK (mirror3). I have
temporarily removed his address from the active mirrors list, so please
flush your DNS cache and try again.
Dan McAllister
QMT DNS/Mirror Admin
file...
Please remove the existing spamassassin-toaster-3.3.2-1.4.3.src.rpm and
re-run...
Thanks,
Dan McAllister
QMT DNS/Mirror Admin
On 7/31/2012 1:45 PM, Tony White wrote:
Hi Dan,
No change I'm afraid...
Getting source packages ...(this may take a while)
spamassassin-toaster-3.3.2-1.4.3
to a third party without written
permission from the Author.
On 01/08/2012 03:53, Dan McAllister wrote:
Tony,
Your included log file states that you've /*already got*/ a
spamassassin vers. 1.4.3, so you won't attempt to download it again...
Then, when you try to build it in the sandbox, you get
the
problematic mirrors as down.
It might be reasonable to create a command-line option to force a mirror
location... but I would hope our mirror ordeal here will be resolved
very soon.
Thanks,
Dan McAllister
QMT DNS/Mirror Admin
--
IT4SOHO, LLC
PO Box 507
St. Petersburg, FL 33731-0507
CALL
On 7/31/2012 2:32 PM, Amit wrote:
Hi Dan,
I’m trying to upgrade the same on my CentOS 6 server using mirror4
QMT-Centos6.sh script but it is not working.
[root@mail ~]# sh QMT-CentOS6.sh
Building on CentOS release 6.3 (Final)
Updating existing packages [
On 8/6/2012 4:30 AM, Philip wrote:
On 8/6/2012 12:10 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 08/05/2012 02:52 PM, Philip Nix Guru wrote:
On 08/05/2012 09:55 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
The subject software upgrades for QMT are now available. These long
awaited upgrades are seriously overdue, as QMT has been
(and templates). (It
should be as easy as a global replace in php-only files!)
Just my thoughts! Before you complain, remember how much you paid for them!
Dan McAllister
--
IT4SOHO, LLC
PO Box 507
St. Petersburg, FL 33731-0507
CALL TOLL FREE:
877-IT4SOHO
We have support plans for QMail!
material. Fortunately, there is no rush, as we'll
be OK with the band-aid until RHEL/COS 7 (which should include PHP 6).
More of my thoughts for free... I have a serious accounts receivable
issue here! ;-)
Enjoy!
Dan McAllister
--
IT4SOHO, LLC
PO Box 507
St. Petersburg, FL 33731-0507
CALL
On 8/6/2012 1:21 PM, Philip Nix Guru wrote:
Hello Eric
yes .rpmmacros is in the root of the user's dir
# cat .rpmmacros
%_topdir /root/src/rpm
# ls /root/src/rpm/
BUILD RPMS SOURCES SPECS SRPMS
Just my 2-cents worth... In RHEL/COS 6, the default build is ~/rpmbuild
Dan McAllister
On 8/11/2012 12:35 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 08/11/2012 08:43 AM, Mike Tirpak wrote:
I keep getting these errors when I run qtp-newmodel...
http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com/repos/nodist/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 4]
IOError: urlopen error (110, 'Connection timed out')
On 8/11/2012 8:08 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
qtp.qmailtoaster.com is back up again, as of several hours ago. That
host is serviced by business cable account which has been very
reliable in the past. As of late it has experienced occasional
outages. The cable company is taking measures to remedy
that plaintext AUTH is even allowed on
port 25... which is what raised my question above.
Regards,
Dan McAllister
PS: I would look into the source code, but I'm pretty sure that the
qmail-smtp that we use is not the stock QMail 1.03 version...
--
IT4SOHO, LLC
PO Box 507
St. Petersburg, FL
in the qmail parsing of mailboxes... so don't
create email accounts with dashes in them!
Dan McAllister
IT4SOHO
--
IT4SOHO, LLC
PO Box 507
St. Petersburg, FL 33731-0507
CALL TOLL FREE:
877-IT4SOHO
We have support plans for QMail
On 10/24/2012 2:47 PM, Daniel Persson wrote:
Hi,
When i in Qmail Toaster Admin list user in domain mydomain.com
all the users are listed, but i have one old alias left after an deleted
account.
Now when i try to add the user i got the message that user exists.
How can i manually delete the
Sebastian,
If you really want php5.3 on CentOS 5, you can manually build the
control-panel package.
Google how to disassemble a SRC RPM and how the build process works...
then remove the PHP dependency (since you already have PHP5.3 installed).
It shouldn't be that hard!
Good Luck
Dan
(as root: *bash QMT-CentOS6-12.10.28.sh*)
Please provide feedback as to how well it works for you!
Thanks
Dan McAllister
--
IT4SOHO, LLC
PO Box 507
St. Petersburg, FL 33731-0507
CALL TOLL FREE:
877-IT4SOHO
We have support plans for QMail!
#!/bin/bash
# Version 2012-10-27 - Re-added EPEL
The version of my script released 202.10.27 has some dependency issues
with the perl modules...
I will release a new script when time permits, but I'm swamped with
other issues at this moment.
Thanks,
Dan McAllister
On 12/17/2012 3:03 PM, Gman wrote:
Hi list
Testing on a fresh install
On 1/7/2013 1:07 AM, Sebastian Grewe wrote:
Only a chef cookbook, not a script by itself.
Cheers,
Sebastian
On 07.01.2013, at 05:13, Dave MacDonald dmacd6...@gmail.com
mailto:dmacd6...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
Any one got a working install script for centos 6
Thanks
Dave
Check the wiki --
Greetings List!
I have a client who is having a problem with SpamAssassin's default
setting of modifying the Subject of a suspected SPAM message with the
tag ***SPAM***
I went into the /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf and changed the string
to just be ***
I wasn't sure how to re-load the
S, what you're saying is RTFM :-)
I ran it -- waiting to see if the new string is applied
Thanks!
Dan
On 1/28/2013 11:48 PM, PakOgah wrote:
On 01/29/13 2:28, Dan McAllister wrote:
Greetings List!
I have a client who is having a problem with SpamAssassin's default
setting of modifying
learning Exchange 2010
(barf) and SharePoint (more barf)
Dan
On 2/13/2013 10:28 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote:
On 12/04/2012 03:09 PM, Dan McAllister wrote:
Greetings all...
I've received a few requests lately from people wanting the latest
QMT-CentOS6 script... the latest of which is attached
Greetings all QMT lovers!
As I approach the finish line on the Mirror Refresh Project (we should
be back up to 9 or even 10 mirrors very soon now), I'm going to start a
new project: Over the past year or so, we've had some attrition in our
DNS server ranks. As a result,*I'm asking for**some
-Firewall and are still using the same PUBLIC IP for your MX.
Enjoy!
Dan McAllister
PS: A more interesting question I'm working on -- I want to make QMT a
SPAM filter -- only I want the NON-SPAM to be forwarded to the real
server (Exchange), while the SPAM is held back (users can access SPAM
Good news -- within the hour ALL of the active mirrors re-synched
properly (only mirror7, not yet activated) failed to synch properly --
and Richard has been notified).
Dan
QMT DNS/Mirror Admin
On 3/16/2013 1:09 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
It's hot off the presses. Source rpm is on the master
My apologies to Richard Whittacker -- the message regarding the mirror
updates was intended only to go to project leader Eric Shubert, not to
the entire list.
I will be more careful in the future.
Dan McAllister
QMT DNS/Mirror Admin
but mirror2 and mirror8 from the
mirrors list until the repo system is repaired.
Dan McAllister
QMT DNS/Mirror Admin
PS: For the record, I have no access to the repo, so I cannot restore
the files myself...
On 3/21/2013 5:59 AM, ridwanfi wrote:
Hi Dan,
I'am trying to update Clamav-toaster
On 4/30/2013 5:14 PM, Myers, Jon W wrote:
I've got a few domains on a REAL old qmail/vpopmail server setup on FreeBSD,
and want to move some of them to my newest qmail toaster box.
the old system has all the domains in a single MySQL table called 'vpopmail'.
Doing a mysql select statement is
server /'til the cows come home/ and it
won't matter! Also, if your bind server is having trouble, set a decent
BACKUP DNS service, and know that mail WILL be delivered, even if bind
gets all bound up! pun intended
Just my thoughts...
Dan McAllister
IT4SOHO
On 5/2/2013 1:58 PM, Eric
I want to chime in on something Eric said recently, and is a common
source of /misconception /with QMT admins:
* QMT _/*does not*/_ provide *DNS resolution* (in fact, _*NO MTA*_
that I am aware of does this itself -- it would violate a *nix
principle of separation of function)
o
and vpopmail are fully compatible with newer PHP versions, and
with CentOS 6... What will happen with RHEL 7 (due out in 2nd half of
2013 or 1st half of 2014) is yet to be seen. (Will QMT officially
support RHEL 6 before the release of RHEL 7???)
Yours in Service :-)
Dan McAllister
IT4SOHO
QMT DNS
the SMART HOST (and I'm open to better ways to do that)...
But, how do I configure outbound mail FROM a specific domain to be
routed only through the SMART HOST?
- smtproutes rules apply to the receiving domain, not the sending one!
I'm interested to hear ideas
Thanks,
Dan McAllister
QMT DNS
for the premium service connect to the premium server for
outbound mail, but the standard server for POP/IMAP
That was the best I could think of... anyone with ideas for a better
way, I'm open to suggestions!
Dan McAllister
QMT DNS/Mirror Admin
spamassassin on
inbound mail, I want to run it on OUTBOUND mail -- and BLOCK anything
that gets tagged as SPAM
Ideas?
Thanks,
Dan McAllister
IT4SOHO
--
PLEASE TAKE NOTE OF OUR NEW ADDRESS
===
IT4SOHO, LLC
33 - 4th Street N, Suite 211
St. Petersburg, FL 33701
by the sending domain (change the -all to a ~all, for
example).
Just my thoughts... hoping to be able to pitch in on some development
work in Aug/Sept.
Dan McAllister
QMT DNS/Mirror Admin
On 7/4/2013 12:21 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 07/03/2013 11:41 PM, Linux wrote:
Dear All,
I am in trouble, I
any experience working with MessageLabs (Symantec by
any other name) with regards to their internal blacklists??
Thanks,
Dan McAllister
QMT DNS/Mirror Admin
PS: You see, even the old guys have headaches with this crap!
--
PLEASE TAKE NOTE OF OUR NEW ADDRESS
* (you'll have to be root to
do this)
You will be asked to provide the postmaster password, and after
that, you can use your web browser to use those blasted qmailadmin
commands to play with your newly hosted domain!
I hope this is complete enough for you!
Dan McAllister
QMT DNS Admin
On 7
method is so simple free!
Automatically adding those lines at the bottom of list postings is an
option in the setup of the list.
Dan McAllister
QMT DNS/Mirror Admin
**
On 7/17/2013 12:28 PM, David wrote:
Hi All,
I am wanting to configure a mailing list on our toaster box for our
customer base
on my QMT list... :-)
Dan McAllister
On 7/17/2013 11:56 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Dan's suggestion is indeed the simplest solution. I don't know to what
degree qmailadmin can be used to manage list accounts though.
Some time ago though, I was frustrated by ezmlm's lack of a web
interface
101 - 200 of 392 matches
Mail list logo
