Hi all,
I just uploaded our preliminary agenda for IETF 119 to the datatracker:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/119/materials/agenda-119-regext-00
Please verify that I didn’t forget or misinterpreted any requests and let the
chairs know if you still want a slot on our agenda.
Though our
the chairs know.
Thanks,
Your co-chairs Jim and Antoin
> Op 29 jan. 2024, om 16:17 heeft Antoin Verschuren
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> This is the formal adoption request for Best Practices for Deletion of Domain
> and Host Objects in the Extensible Provisionin
rposes
> of signalling, and it's fine for this sort of thing to override the
> requirement above. (nro_rdap_profile_asn_flat_0 and
> nro_rdap_profile_asn_hierarchical_0 are examples of this, where the document
> itself requires implementations to pick one or the other, and that's fine
are addressed, please write the document
shepherd writeup.
Thanks to everyone that contributed to this review!
Regards,
Jim and Antoin
REGEXT WG Co-Chairs
> Op 27 nov. 2023, om 15:51 heeft Antoin Verschuren
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> The document editors ha
This is the formal adoption request for Best Practices for Deletion of Domain
and Host Objects in the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP):
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hollenbeck-regext-epp-delete-bcp/
Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption
Hi all,
It is time to schedule our session for IETF 119 next week.
Since we had too little time scheduled for IETF 118 where we filled our
complete 1,5 hour time slot, we are thinking of requesting 2 hours this time if
people come up with enough agenda items.
We see enough reasons on the list
Reminder,
This WGLC will end tonight. So far we only had 3 notifications of support. (And
a comment from the document shepherd)
Please indicate your support if you didn’t already do so for us to judge
consensus.
Regards,
Your co-chairs Jim and Antoin
> Op 27 nov. 2023, om 15:51 heeft Ant
.
Thanks,
Jim and Antoin
> Op 20 nov. 2023, om 15:36 heeft Antoin Verschuren
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> This is a formal adoption request for An RDAP Extension for Geofeed Data:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jasdips-regext-rdap-geofeed/
>
>
The document editors have indicated that the following document is ready for
submission to the IESG to be considered for publication as a Proposed Standard:
RDAP RIR Search
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search/05/
Please indicate your support or no objection for
This is a formal adoption request for An RDAP Extension for Geofeed Data:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jasdips-regext-rdap-geofeed/
Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by
REGEXT and comment to this message on the list, clearly stating your
;> Antoin,
>>>
>>> I'm willing to give up agenda items 6.iv. (rdap-extensions) and 6.v.
>>> (rdap-x-media-type) to give Maarten 10 minutes to discuss restful EPP.
>>> To me that seems like a better use of face-to-face time as both of my
>>> draft
Hi Maarten,
Unfortunately, our agenda for IETF 118 is already fully booked with no space to
overrun.
Perhaps we should consider a 2 hour meeting request for next IETF 119.
Regards,
Antoin
> Op 16 okt. 2023, om 17:52 heeft Maarten Wullink
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi Antoin,
>
> Maybe
Hi All,
Ii’s time to think about agenda items for IETF 118.
Jim and I requested a one and half hour time slot this time, same as IETF 117.
So if you intend to request for a presentation, please let the chairs know.
Regards,
Jim and Antoin
___
regext
Hi All,
Ii’s time to think about agenda items for IETF 117.
Jim and I requested a one and half hour time slot this time. Half an hour more
than IETF 116.
So if you intend to request for a presentation, please let the chairs know.
Regards,
Jim and Antoin
to
the working group, and issue another WGLC when the issues are resolved.
Regards,
Jim and Antoin.
> Op 17 apr. 2023, om 15:27 heeft Antoin Verschuren
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> The document editors have indicated that the following document is ready for
> submission to the IESG t
Antoin Verschuren has requested publication of
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-22 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the
REGEXT working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search
draft name:
draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl
The document authors must also identify a document shepherd. If you would like
to volunteer please let them know.
Work can begin as soon as the 00 is published.
Thanks,
Jim and Antoin
> Op 25 apr. 2023, om 22:54 heeft Antoin Verschuren
> het vo
Mar 30, 2023 at 10:37:54AM +0200, Antoin Verschuren wrote:
>> I have read this draft, and have some comments/requests as discussed
>> during our IETF 116 meeting session.
>> Most of my remarks are about section 4, Link Relations:
>>
>> 1. Suggest to replace “operato
This is a formal adoption request for Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
mapping for DNS Time-To-Live (TTL) values:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-regext-brown-epp-ttl/
Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by
REGEXT and comment to this
The document editors have indicated that the following document is ready for
submission to the IESG to be considered for publication as a Proposed Standard:
Redacted Fields in the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Response
Chair hat off.
Thank you Tom for this document and your presentation. I like it a lot.
I have read this draft, and have some comments/requests as discussed during our
IETF 116 meeting session.
Most of my remarks are about section 4, Link Relations:
1. Suggest to replace “operator” with “server
Tom,
Since you were the last one to comment, can you please confirm that the issues
you raised on version 17 of this document are now resolved and the document is
stable so we can issue a WGLC?
Regards,
Jim and Antoin
> Op 6 mrt. 2023, om 11:54 heeft Mario Loffredo het
> volgende
-Dan
>
> On 2/13/23, 9:18 AM, "regext on behalf of Antoin Verschuren"
> mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of
> ietf=40antoin...@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:40antoin...@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
>
>
> Caution: This email originated from outsid
Hi All,
Ii’s time to think about agenda items for IETF 116.
Jim and I requested an hour time slot, same as last IETF 115 meeting.
So if you intend to request for a presentation, please let the chairs know.
Regards,
Jim and Antoin
___
regext mailing
as the 00 is published.
Thanks,
Jim and Antoin
> Op 19 dec. 2022, om 15:33 heeft Antoin Verschuren
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> This is the formal adoption request for RDAP RIR Search:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-harrison-regext-rdap-rir-search/
>
>
This is the formal adoption request for RDAP RIR Search:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-harrison-regext-rdap-rir-search/
Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by
REGEXT and comment to the list, clearly stating your view.
This Call For Adoption
Hi all, can all people that commented on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search
since the start of the previous last call (Tom, Pawel, Jasdip) confirm that all
their issues are now addressed in version 17, so that the document shepherd can
confirm there are no new changes to be expected during
if this is a
material change, we will issue another WGLC once the document is stable and all
issues are addressed, so that we can make a clear consensus call on the final
stable version of this document.
Regards,
Jim and Antoin
> Op 3 okt. 2022, om 15:26 heeft Antoin Verschuren
> het volgende gesc
make this statement?
After all these are addressed, then we can declare consensus and move the
document along.
> Op 26 sep. 2022, om 16:00 heeft Antoin Verschuren
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Given the discussion below, we are considering to extend this WGLC for at
> mo
and Antoin
> Op 26 sep. 2022, om 11:46 heeft Mario Loffredo
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi Patrick,
>
> thanks for your review.
>
> Please find my comments inline.
>
> Il 25/09/2022 18:21, Patrick Mevzek ha scritto:
>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2022, at 08:54, Antoin
support (a simple “+1” is sufficient) or
concerns with the publication of this document by replying to this message on
the list.
Regards,
Jim and Antoin
> Op 12 sep. 2022, om 15:54 heeft Antoin Verschuren
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Dear Working Group,
>
> The author
Dear Working Group,
The authors of the following working group document have indicated that it is
believed to be ready for submission to the IESG for publication as a standards
track document:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search/
This WG last call will end
Hi All,
Ii’s time to think about agenda items for IETF 115 to see how much time we need
for our meeting.
Jim and I are thinking to request a same one hour time slot as last IETF 114
meeting, unless we get a lot of requests from you for new work.
So if you intend to request for a presentation,
Hi all,
Sorry for not responding to this earlier, but after an extended vacation it
took me quite some time to digest the discussion and form an opinion.
We would like you to know that I have published the agenda for IETF114, and we
have reserved a 30 minutes discussion on this topic.
We
Hi All,
Ii’s time to think about agenda items for IETF 114 to see how much time we need
for our meeting.
Jim and I are thinking to request a same one hour time slot as last IETF 113
meeting, unless we get a lot of requests from you for new work.
So if you intend to request for a presentation,
apr. 2022, om 15:43 heeft Antoin Verschuren
> het volgende geschreven:
>
>
> WGLC for this document should have ended last week.
> But since there is still a good discussion going on between the Document
> Shepherd and the authors, the chairs have decided to extend this WGLC for
the authors or shepherd)
we would like to ask for more support from the WG as well. 2 is very little to
declare consensus. Could others please review as soon as Mario has published a
new version with the comments from Scott and Tom included?
> Op 11 apr. 2022, om 15:50 heeft Antoin Verschuren
>
Reminder,
1 more week remaining for this WGLC.
In addition to the authors, we received 3 responses so far.
Regards,
Jim and Antoin
> Op 4 apr. 2022, om 15:18 heeft Antoin Verschuren
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Dear Working Group,
>
> The authors of the follo
Dear Working Group,
The authors of the following working group document have indicated that it is
believed to be ready for submission to the IESG for publication as a standards
track document:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search/
This WG last call will end
the questions and answers in the already
prepared template with the pre-populated agenda. If you volunteer (please) let
the chairs know.
regards,
Jim and Antoin
> Op 17 jan. 2022, om 15:22 heeft Antoin Verschuren het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Ii’s time to think
Reminder…
Jim and Antoin
> Op 17 jan. 2022, om 15:22 heeft Antoin Verschuren
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Ii’s time to think about agenda items for IETF 113 to see how much time we
> need for our meeting.
> The deadline for requesting a meeting slot
Hi All,
Ii’s time to think about agenda items for IETF 113 to see how much time we need
for our meeting.
The deadline for requesting a meeting slot will be end of next week.
Jim and I are thinking to request a same one hour time slot as last IETF 112
meeting, unless we get a lot of requests
update
> it after the WGLC.
>
> Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
>
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 5:15 PM Hollenbeck, Scott
> <mailto:40verisign@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
>
>
> From: regext mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org>> On
> Behalf Of Antoin Ve
ur TLD can simply be ignored or
refused by local policy)
But certainly interesting to see this discussion return.
- --
Antoin Verschuren - No Hat
> Op 20 dec. 2021, om 18:09 heeft Gavin Brown het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I was recently contacted by an
Dear WG,
This WGLC will end tonight, and so far we only have 2 explicit voices of
support.
This is a bit low to declare consensus. Could more people voice their support?
Scott, can you confirm that the changes in version 05 address your initial
concerns?
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6
status next week.
Which leaves the remaining questions Mario posted in his original message.
- --
Antoin Verschuren
> Op 8 dec. 2021, om 14:53 heeft Gould, James
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> I view the jscontact is a valid use case for a standards track RDAP
> extension.
Hi all,
In addition to the questions from Mario, we still need to discuss the status of
this document as discussed during the IETF112 meeting:
"the document doesn’t have designated status; it was adopted without a status
(on purpose). We need to think about the implications. Encouraged group
Dear Working Group,
The authors of the following working group document have indicated that it is
believed to be ready for submission to the IESG for publication as a standards
track document:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai/
This WG last call will end at close of
?
We may also have some time on our agenda left for new work.
Please let the chairs know if you want some time on the agenda before next week.
Regards,
Jim and Antoin
> Op 13 sep. 2021, om 15:19 heeft Antoin Verschuren het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Ii’s tim
Antoin Verschuren has requested publication of draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-04
as Internet Standard on behalf of the REGEXT working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis
Hi All,
Ii’s time already to think about agenda items for IETF 112.
The deadline for requesting a meeting slot will be next week.
Jim and I are thinking to request a same one hour time slot as last IETF 111
meeting, unless we get a lot of requests from you for new work.
If you intend to request
address changes”?
If the new registrar cannot handle that, he is not worthy. Let him swim ;-)
- --
Antoin Verschuren
no-hats
> Op 2 sep. 2021, om 11:39 heeft Martin Casanova
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi
>
> Since we have programs in place to push DNSSEC our number
have set a milestone for this work to be May 2022.
Please also inform the chairs who will be the document shepherd.
Regards,
Jim and Antoin
> Op 16 aug. 2021, om 15:39 heeft Antoin Verschuren het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> This is the formal adoption request for Red
This is the formal adoption request for Redacted Fields in the Registration
Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Response:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gould-regext-rdap-redacted/
Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by
REGEXT, and comment to the list,
Antoin Verschuren has requested publication of
draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-15 as Proposed Standard on behalf of
the REGEXT working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance
Hi all,
With the virtual IETF 111 meeting to be scheduled, this is our first call for
agenda items for our REGEXT meeting slot.
If you wish to discuss any topics, please let the chairs know.
We have requested a 1 hour meeting slot, and expect authors of documents on our
milestone list to give
Hi all,
This is a preliminary call for agenda items for the virtual IETF 111 meeting.
Jim and I plan to request for a 1 hour slot since we only have 4 active
documents on our milestone list for now, and the IESG have asked us to be
conservative in our time consumption this time.
Since we also
it to the IESG.
Thank you all for your review and confirmation of support.
Your co-chair, Antoin.
> Op 29 mrt. 2021, om 14:49 heeft Antoin Verschuren het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> The following working group document is believed to be ready for submission
> to the IESG for publication
Hi all,
This is a reminder that this 2nd WGLC will end tonight!
We still don’t seem to have enough consensus, so please state your support.
Also if you have responded to the first WGLC.
Regards,
Jim and Antoin
> Op 29 mrt. 2021, om 14:49 heeft Antoin Verschuren het
> volgende gesc
Yao
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 1:43 AM
> To: Tobias Sattler <mailto:satt...@united-domains.de>>; Mario Loffredo
> mailto:mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it>>
> Cc: Antoin Verschuren mailto:i...@antoin.nl>>; regext
> mailto:regext@ietf.org>>
> Subject: Re: [regex
Just to be clear, since this is a 2nd WGLC, the new WGLC is for
draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-12
> Op 29 mrt. 2021, om 14:49 heeft Antoin Verschuren het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> The following working group document is believed to be ready for submission
&
The following working group document is believed to be ready for submission to
the IESG for publication as a standards track document:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance/
EXTRA ATTENTION: This is the second WGLC for this document. During the first
WGLC,
This is a formal adoption request for “Use of Internationalized Email Addresses
in EPP protocol”:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-belyavskiy-epp-eai/
Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by
REGEXT, and comment to the list, clearly stating your view.
for this meeting.
Regards,
> Op 8 mrt. 2021, om 16:23 heeft Antoin Verschuren het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have updated our agenda for tomorrow’s meeting.
> Could all the presenters that did not get a confirmation from me yet about
> their prese
Hi all,
I have updated our agenda for tomorrow’s meeting.
Could all the presenters that did not get a confirmation from me yet about
their presentation slides send them to regext-cha...@ietf.org before COB today,
so we can upload them to the Meeting Materials page for our participants to
This is a call for agenda items for our next virtual IETF 110 meeting.
As you may have seen, the IETF 110 preliminary agenda has given us a slot on
Tuesday March 9 at 16:00 UTC.
Apart from our regular progress report we have one item on the agenda so far:
-draft-belyavskiy-epp-eai (Dmitry
and
to address the outstanding comments.
Regards
Jim and Antoin
> Op 18 jan. 2021, om 15:59 heeft Antoin Verschuren het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> James,
>
> Just to note for the record, I was surprised by your surprise ;-), since the
> document authors asked us for a WGLC i
erisign.com>
> >
>
> 703-948-3271
> 12061 Bluemont Way
> Reston, VA 20190
>
> Verisign.com <http://verisign.com/> <http://verisigninc.com/
> <http://verisigninc.com/>>
>
> On 1/4/21, 9:40 AM, "regext on behalf of Antoin Verschuren"
ort… sorry for late reply
>
> From: regext mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org>> on
> behalf of "Hollenbeck, Scott" <mailto:shollenbeck=40verisign@dmarc.ietf.org>>
> Date: Thursday, January 7, 2021 at 7:50 AM
> To: Antoin Verschuren mailto:i...@antoin.nl>>,
&
ard
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Support… sorry for late reply
>
> From: regext mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org>> on
> behalf of "Hollenbeck, Scott" <mailto:shollenbeck=40verisign@dmarc.ietf.org>>
> Date: Thursday, January 7, 2021 at 7:50
Hi all,
With the virtual IETF 110 meeting to be scheduled, this is our first call for
agenda items for our REGEXT meeting slot.
If you wish to discuss any topics, please let the chairs know, so we can make
an estimated guess of how much time we will need for our next meeting.
We will need to
>
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 08:55:21PM +0100, Antoin Verschuren wrote:
>> This is a special second working group last call for:
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis/
>>
>> This document is suggested to be elevated from “proposed s
>
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 08:55:14PM +0100, Antoin Verschuren wrote:
>> This is a special second working group last call for:
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis/
>>
>> This document is suggested to be elevated from “proposed s
The following working group document is believed to be ready for submission to
the IESG for publication as a standards track document:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance/
This WG last call will end at close of business, Monday, 18 Januari 2021.
Please
Antoin Verschuren has requested publication of
draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-06 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the
REGEXT working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces
and Antoin
> Op 9 dec. 2020, om 10:59 heeft Mario Loffredo het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> +1
>
> Mario
>
> Il 08/12/2020 20:55, Antoin Verschuren ha scritto:
>> This is a special second working group last call for:
>>
>> https://datatracker
and Antoin
> Op 9 dec. 2020, om 10:59 heeft Mario Loffredo het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> +1
>
> Mario
>
> Il 08/12/2020 20:55, Antoin Verschuren ha scritto:
>> This is a special second working group last call for:
>>
>> https://datatracker
This is a special second working group last call for:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis/
This document is suggested to be elevated from “proposed standard” to "Internet
standard” as described by the process in RFC6410.
We therefor seek specific consensus from
This is a special second working group last call for:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis/
This document is suggested to be elevated from “proposed standard” to "Internet
standard” as described by the process in RFC6410.
We therefor seek specific consensus from
Antoin Verschuren has requested publication of draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis-04
as Proposed Standard on behalf of the REGEXT working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis
Antoin Verschuren has requested publication of draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis-02
as Proposed Standard on behalf of the REGEXT working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis
Thank you Scott and all others that replied during the extended WGLC..
This is to inform you that this WGLC is now officially closed.
We had 3 explicit statements of support for this document, and 2 concerns which
led to an extended WGLC.
1 of the concerns was addressed by the autor in a new
Thank you Scott and all others that replied during the extended WGLC..
The chairs agree with the Authors that there was no consensus reached during
the extended WGLC to make changes to the document.
Therefor this WGLC is now officially closed.
We had 3 explicit statements of support for this
Hi all,
This is a call for agenda items for the IETF 109 virtual meeting.
The chairs plan to request a meeting slot, but we would like to know how long a
session is needed..
A special note to authors of newly adopted or an active draft on our milestones
list:
If you want your document to
The following working group document is believed to be ready for submission to
the IESG for publication as a standards track document:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis/
This WG last call will end at close of business, Friday, 2 October 2020.
Please review this
The following working group document is believed to be ready for submission to
the IESG for publication as a standards track document:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis/
This WG last call will end at close of business, Friday, 2 October 2020.
Please review this
Dear working group,
The chairs are aware that during/since IETF108 we have received 5 requests for
WGLC for the following documents:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis/
and get feedback on their documents to move them along.
Regards,
Jim and Antoin
> Op 19 jun. 2020, om 15:42 heeft Antoin Verschuren het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for agenda items for the IETF 108 virtual meeting.
> The chairs have requested a
Antoin Verschuren has requested publication of
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging-14 as Proposed Standard on behalf of
the REGEXT working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging
Hi all,
This is a call for agenda items for the IETF 108 virtual meeting.
The chairs have requested a 100 minutes time slot for IETF 108.
So far, we only have one request for an agenda item.
A special note to authors of newly adopted or an active draft on our milestones
list:
If you want your
.
Regards,
Your co-chairs Jim and Antoin
> Op 15 mei 2020, om 15:54 heeft Antoin Verschuren het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Dear working group,
>
> Now that we have 2 more RDAP slots available on our milestones, we had new
> requests for adoption:
>
> This is a forma
.
Regards,
Your co-chairs Jim and Antoin
> Op 15 mei 2020, om 15:54 heeft Antoin Verschuren het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Dear working group,
>
> Now that we have 2 more RDAP slots available on our milestones, we had new
> requests for adoption:
>
> This i
Hi all,
It is time again to start thinking about scheduling a meeting for IETF 108.
As you are aware, IETF 108 will be an all virtual meeting this time.
We are reaching out to you to ask your opinion on scheduling a meeting.
What conflicts with other working groups or BOF’s should be avoided?
Antoin Verschuren has requested publication of
draft-ietf-regext-tmch-func-spec-08 as Informational on behalf of the REGEXT
working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-tmch-func-spec
<mailto:mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it>> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Mario
>>
>> Il 08/05/2020 15:36, Antoin Verschuren ha scritto:
>> > Dear working group,
>> >
>> > We will soon have a slot available in our milestone list for a new
>> &
Dear working group,
Now that we have 2 more RDAP slots available on our milestones, we had new
requests for adoption:
This is a formal adoption request for JSON Responses for the Registration Data
Access Protocol (RDAP):
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hollenbeck-regext-rfc7483bis/
Dear working group,
Now that we have 2 more RDAP slots available on our milestones, we had new
requests for adoption:
This is a formal adoption request for Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)
Query Format:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hollenbeck-regext-rfc7482bis/
Please
hreven:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: regext On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren
>> Sent: Friday, May 8, 2020 9:37 AM
>> To: regext
>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-yee-regext-simple-
>> registration-reporting
>>
>
Dear working group,
We will soon have a slot available in our milestone list for a new EPP/Registry
document.
The chairs are not aware of any outstanding adoption requests other than this
one.
This is a formal adoption request for Simple Registration Reporting:
15:43 heeft Antoin Verschuren het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> The following working group document is believed to be ready for submission
> to the IESG for publication as a standards track document:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-pagi
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
