Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver
with COR
Russ, you need to get hold of a spell checker. :-)
(or not have it automatically 'fix' all the things it thinks is wrong.)
Joe M.
russ wrote:
The problem
AM
Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver
with
COR]]]
Mastr II and Micor not ok to use in part 90?!?!?!?!?
Says who?
russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gee I was work at ATC when the memo came down to remove all Master 2
RCA
and Micores
- Original Message -
From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz
Receiver with COR
I'll have to check that about part 90!!
Regarding the Maggiore
Put a diode in series, .7 volts drop,remember?
- Original Message -
From: Mathew Quaife [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR
The voltage at the tap point is about 7
At 08:15 PM 3/30/2004 -0500, you wrote:
Put a diode in series, .7 volts drop,remember?
---If in series yes. But since that diode would be in series with (more
than likely) a bipolar transistor C-E junction with its emitter to ground,
that would add another .6 volts to the equation. Therefore he'd
Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver
with COR
In my opinion, the reason someone might change from Motorola to
Kenwood is price ... and perhaps attitude.
Neil - WA6KLA
russ wrote:
I do not think so on the cars. I think you need to think about
@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 7:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver
with COR
In my opinion, the reason someone might change from Motorola to
Kenwood is price ... and perhaps attitude.
Neil - WA6KLA
Actually, Kenwood commercial
it is not
cheap. You get what you pay for. smile
Very best of 73,
Russ, W3CH
- Original Message -
From: Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver
with COR
installed.
73 Russ, W3CH
- Original Message -
From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with
COR]]]
Mastr II and Micor not ok to use
best.
Russ, W3CH
- Original Message -
From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 8:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver
with COR
In my opinion, the reason someone might
There are only 2 people who I have ever seen say that Maggoire is good
equipment. Russ and a well know fool on this group.
Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
russ wrote:
THE BELOW IS SOMTHING THAT A LOT OF US KNOW AND SOME WILL NOT ADMITT.
The way the mother M keeps down the desence
is to
: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]
There are only 2 people who I have ever seen say that Maggoire is good
equipment. Russ and a well know fool on this group.
Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
russ wrote:
THE BELOW IS SOMTHING THAT A LOT OF US KNOW AND SOME WILL NOT ADMITT
; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]
There are only 2 people who I have ever seen say that Maggoire is good
equipment. Russ and a well know fool o
- Original Message -
From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with
COR]]
There are only 2 people who I have ever seen say
IL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with
COR]]
There are only 2 people who I have ever seen say
- Original Message -
From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]
There are only 2 people who I have ever seen say that Maggoire is good
]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]
There are only 2 people who I have ever seen say that Maggoire is good
equipment. Russ and a well know fool on this group.
Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
, March 29, 2004 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with
COR]]
There are only 2 people who I have ever seen say that Maggoire is good
equipment. Russ and a well know fool on this group.
Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
To Neal NewmanI think [EMAIL PROTECTED] is referring to me as the fool.
Obviously he has no idea who I am nor my past contributions to scientific and
television research. Having noted past demeaning comments to some from this
individual, I wish he would keep his negative comments to
PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 4:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR
At 03:45 PM 3/28/2004 -0800, you wrote:
Just something with good sensitivity and the cor. It's really a low key
repeater.
--I have a Spectra Tac
: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]
- Original Message -
From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR
Come on out and see 18 that work fine. Well installed and work great.
73 Russ, W3CH
- Original Message -
From: Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 9:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]
I
and forth.
Again came out and see a good system well installed.
73 Russ, W3CH
- Original Message -
From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with
COR
Message -
From: Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]
- Original Message -
From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder
At 06:10 AM 3/30/2004 -0800, you wrote:
The receiver that is on the 440 machine is a Uniden
radio, for which we pulled the de-emphasized audio from. Then we used a
COR, which actually is nothing more than a voltage drop.
---Well Mathew. It doesn't sound like you need a new receiver. That would
If what you are trying to get is a stronger signal from a weaker one,
use an open npn collector as the switch - in order for it to trigger
with reliability you do need for the signal to go above 3 and below 2
volts for this to occur - it takes the strain off the radio electronics
and you can also
-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 7:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR
At 06:10 AM 3/30/2004 -0800, you wrote:
The receiver that is on the 440 machine is a Uniden
radio, for which we pulled the de-emphasized audio from. Then we used a
COR
At 09:07 AM 3/30/2004 -0800, you wrote:
The voltage at the tap point is about 7 volts, when keyed it drops to about
.5 volts, just not enough to get it to key the controller. I looked for
other sources in the radio, nothing would drop to zero volts.
---I'm surprised your controller doesn't
the input here, glad that someone is willing to help.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: Ken Arck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 9:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR
At 09:07 AM 3/30/2004 -0800, you wrote
with
COR]]
- Original Message -
From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with
COR]]
There are only 2 people who I
The voltage at the tap point is about 7 volts, when keyed it drops to
about
.5 volts, just not enough to get it to key the controller. I looked
for
other sources in the radio, nothing would drop to zero volts.
Try putting a small silicon diode or two in series with the wire. That
should
which I know works on my CSI Phone patch, connect (start) with a 10K
resistor, the part I am lost at is the ground. When you say a pull
down
resistor, is this any different than a standard 1/2 watt resistor? I
appreciate the input here, glad that someone is willing to help.
You will see
Thanks Russ, will give them a call.
Mathew
russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try Maggiore Labs in West Chester PA.there phone number is 610-436-6051 they make a top notch reciver. Betterthen some of the older stuff for around the same price.Good luck and 73,Russ, W3CHTrustee W3PSMetro-Comm
Try Maggiore Labs in West Chester PA.
there phone number is 610-436-6051 they make a top notch reciver. Better
then some of the older stuff for around the same price.
Good luck and 73,
Russ, W3CH
Trustee W3PS
Metro-Comm repeater network.
- Original Message -
From: w9mwq [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am I confused, or haven't we all talked about Maggoire labs equipment before
said they are crap?
russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try Maggiore Labs in West Chester PA.
there phone number is 610-436-6051 they make a top notch reciver. Better
then some of the older stuff for around the same
A lot of Maggoire repeater bashing has been mentioned. I must admit Russ, you
have good things to say about Maggorie. A super secret 220 Mhz repeater was
just installed on the tower I am on and where did they put the antenna? Right
next to my 2 meter repeater antenna. Everytime the 220 machine
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]
A lot of Maggoire repeater bashing has been mentioned. I must admit Russ,
you
have good things to say about Maggorie. A super secret 220
If a Mastr II doesn't sound good, they don't have it set up right. Fred KF4QZN - Original Message - From: russ Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 4:16 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR] THE BELOW IS SOMTHING
:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]
Am I confused, or haven't we all talked about Maggoire labs equipment
before
said they are crap?
russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try Maggiore Labs in West Chester PA.
there phone number is 610-436-6051 they make
russ wrote:
THE BELOW IS SOMTHING THAT A LOT OF US KNOW AND SOME WILL NOT ADMITT.
The way the mother M keeps down the desence
is to not have a lot of sencitive but the Maggiore (new) is so clean I do
not know how they do it.
I have seen what you are talking about at some of our sites. Fell
What model or type are you looking for?
You said inexpensive, would an older Hamtronics unit suit or do you need
something like a Micor or Mastr II receiver?
Kevin
w9mwq wrote:
I am looking for a inexpensive 440 Mhz receiver with a COR output to
replace the one that is with my 440 repeater.
Just something with good sensitivity and the cor. It's really a low key
repeater.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Custer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR
At 03:45 PM 3/28/2004 -0800, you wrote:
Just something with good sensitivity and the cor. It's really a low key
repeater.
--I have a Spectra Tac receiver (that's a receiver from a Micor),
mid-split with channel element and squelch gate card. It's in a rack mount
and all you need do is supply it
43 matches
Mail list logo
