On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:57 PM, ken manheimer
>> wrote:
>>
>>> i'm getting the impression that you have a talent for understatement. :-)
>>>
>>
>> Yeah. People keep telling me that, no idea why :)
>>
>> th
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 1:36 AM, Martin Aspeli
> wrote:
> ken manheimer wrote:
>
> > now, instead of just asking whether and how to use plone under wsgi, i'm
> > considering whether i should be looking at switching my focus to bfg, at
> > least for some projects. while i'm thankful to better und
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:57 PM, ken manheimer
> wrote:
>> i'm getting the impression that you have a talent for understatement. :-)
>
> Yeah. People keep telling me that, no idea why :)
>
>> through a happy accident, a search through my inbox for "repoze" turned up
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>> There is something to consider: I suspect more things are started to
>> require the new publisher events from Zope2, either directly or via one
>> of the backport packages for Zope 2.10. I'm not sure if repoze.
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>> There is something to consider: I suspect more things are started to
>> require the new publisher events from Zope2, either directly or via one
>> of the backport packages for Zope 2.10. I'm not sure if repoze.
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:57 PM, ken manheimer wrote:
> i'm getting the impression that you have a talent for understatement. :-)
Yeah. People keep telling me that, no idea why :)
> through a happy accident, a search through my inbox for "repoze" turned up
> shane hathaway's february 2009 zope.
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> There is something to consider: I suspect more things are started to
> require the new publisher events from Zope2, either directly or via one
> of the backport packages for Zope 2.10. I'm not sure if repoze.zope2
> supports those.
A "fo
On 2010-1-17 07:33, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>
>> repoze.zope2 and .plone have been written largely by Agendaless for
>> the KARL project. That project has gone through another iteration and
>> nowadays uses repoze.bfg without any Plone instead. While there are
>> some indivi
ken manheimer wrote:
> now, instead of just asking whether and how to use plone under wsgi, i'm
> considering whether i should be looking at switching my focus to bfg, at
> least for some projects. while i'm thankful to better understand the
> various projects, i'm a bit overwhelmed at the uncert
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> repoze.zope2 and .plone have been written largely by Agendaless for
> the KARL project. That project has gone through another iteration and
> nowadays uses repoze.bfg without any Plone instead. While there are
> some individual users of the repoze.plone approach, there's
ken manheimer wrote:
> hi, all! i have some questions about repoze.plone from the
> systems-integrator perspective. in particular, i need to know how much
> using plone under repoze necessarily restricts plone version, upgrades, etc.
>
> the immediate reason i ask is because a client uses some ad
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Chris Rossi wrote:
> I will add only anecdotally, that I've taken a customer from 3.1 up to
> 3.3.2 with repoze and the repoze piece has posed no issues. It's a
> little clunky, but it works. I look forward to WSGI integrated into
> the core Zope/Plone stack.
>
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm not a representative of the Repoze project, so I'll just share my
> personal view.
>
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 9:23 PM, ken manheimer
> wrote:
> > these seem to be likely questions if you're interested in adoption of
> > repo
I will add only anecdotally, that I've taken a customer from 3.1 up to
3.3.2 with repoze and the repoze piece has posed no issues. It's a
little clunky, but it works. I look forward to WSGI integrated into
the core Zope/Plone stack.
Chris
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Hanno Schlichting wro
Hi.
I'm not a representative of the Repoze project, so I'll just share my
personal view.
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 9:23 PM, ken manheimer wrote:
> these seem to be likely questions if you're interested in adoption of
> repoze.plone by the wider plone community. please let me know if i'm
> misunde
hi, all! i have some questions about repoze.plone from the
systems-integrator perspective. in particular, i need to know how much
using plone under repoze necessarily restricts plone version, upgrades, etc.
the immediate reason i ask is because a client uses some add-on products
that depend on p
16 matches
Mail list logo
