Re: unix client?

like, leave the volume "mounted" on the backup server and have it back it up that way? - Original Message - From: "Stephen Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'retro-talk'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 5:21 PM Subject:

Re: unix client?

Hi Stephen, on 9/3/01 9:21 AM, Stephen Jones at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What about running Samba on the Unix machine and backing it up across the > network as an NT volume? This is what I currently do with some Linux servers ... its ok, but I don't let samba "publish" the whole system ... ju

RE: unix client?

What about running Samba on the Unix machine and backing it up across the network as an NT volume? Steve Cybernetics -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of andrew Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 5:16 PM To: retro-talk Subject: Re: unix client

Re: unix client?

iles on it) but they want it backed up as well in case it should ever crash. Would the beta client be able to accommodate that scenario? - Original Message - From: "matt barkdull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "retro-talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March

Re: unix client?

A linux client is in Beta right now, but no final is out. >is there a client for backing up datafiles on a Unix server? > -- -- To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives:

Re: Unix?

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: retro-talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Unix? > > At 9:55 AM -0500 3/15/00, Rich Lafferty wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 03:19:46AM -0600, Verne Arase >> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >>> Aren't you polluting the net

Re: Unix?

At 9:55 AM -0500 3/15/00, Rich Lafferty wrote: >On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 03:19:46AM -0600, Verne Arase >([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Aren't you polluting the network with twice the traffic if you do this? > >I'm not sure I understand why; if you mount the netatalk-shared volume >on the machine

Re: Unix?

sometimes they smell nice as well. Jon Gardner wrote: > If it's worth being backed up, then it's worth the > bandwidth (and what's a network for, if not to transfer data? Just a bunch > of pretty lights and colorful wires?). -- top of the world, Luke Jaeger, Technology Coordinator Disney Ma

Re: Unix?

on 3/14/2000 5:32 PM, Malcolm McLeary at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The bottom line appears to be that something "extra" has to be installed > either on the Unix/Linux machine or the Retrospect machine ... it would all > be so much cleaner with a specific Retrospect client for Unix/Linux. ...alt

Re: Unix?

>> Aren't you polluting the network with twice the traffic if you do this? > > Unfortunately, you throw away all of your ownership and permissions > information at the same time. :-/ Not to rant or anything, but the real question here is, "How bad do you want a backup?" Backups require dedicated

Re: Unix?

On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 03:19:46AM -0600, Verne Arase ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > At 11:50 AM -0800 3/14/00, Doug Hinschberger wrote: > >Jon Gardner at [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >Run Samba on the UNIX boxes to provide SMB filesharing. You can then mount > >>the shared drives on the NT box (if t

Re: Unix?

At 11:50 AM -0800 3/14/00, Doug Hinschberger wrote: >Jon Gardner at [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Run Samba on the UNIX boxes to provide SMB filesharing. You can then mount >>the shared drives on the NT box (if that's your backup platform) or buy DAVE >>for the Mac OS and use that to mount the UNIX and

Re: Unix?

>The bottom line appears to be that something "extra" has to be installed >either on the Unix/Linux machine or the Retrospect machine ... it would all >be so much cleaner with a specific Retrospect client for Unix/Linux. FWIW, Appletalk is compiled in as a module by default in LinuxPPC, and I ha

Re: Unix?

John, >> The point is, without installing Netatalk or SAMBA there are no network >> drives to mount. Unix/Linux does not provide native filesharing support for >> MacOS or Windows ... that is what Netatalk and SAMBA do. > > Or you can install MacNFS on the Mac. I have not tried MacNFS, but it "

Re: Unix?

>Or you can install MacNFS on the Mac. Is this the recently released $150(?) client from Thursby (I think)? Anybody here used it and have comments? (um, for backup issues, to keep it on-topic). Stefan Jeglinski -- -- To subscribe:

Re: Unix?

Or you can install MacNFS on the Mac. john > From: Malcolm McLeary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "retro-talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 10:09:20 +1100 > To: retro-talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Unix? > > Jo

Re: Unix?

>Retro will backup files from a mounted network drive. You don't have to be >running a client on the other machine. oops, yes that makes complete sense to me now that I think about it. Thanks for setting me straight... Stefan Jeglinski -- ---

Re: Unix?

Jon, on 15/3/00 9:48 AM, Jon Gardner at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> What about using Netatalk to mount volumes on a Unix/Linux box for >>> Retrospect to backup? Anyone doing this? >> >> Unless I'm missing something obvious, the issue that keeps coming >> back to haunt Dantz :-) is that there i

Re: Unix?

on 3/14/2000 2:23 PM, Stefan Jeglinski at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> What about using Netatalk to mount volumes on a Unix/Linux box for >> Retrospect to backup? Anyone doing this? > > Unless I'm missing something obvious, the issue that keeps coming > back to haunt Dantz :-) is that there is no

Re: Unix?

>What about using Netatalk to mount volumes on a Unix/Linux box for >Retrospect to backup? Anyone doing this? Unless I'm missing something obvious, the issue that keeps coming back to haunt Dantz :-) is that there is no client to run on the *nix box. Netatalk or not, Retrospect has no way to co

Re: Unix?

Jon Gardner at [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> I need to set up tape backup for a web site which runs on four Sun >> Solaris Unix boxes and one NT machine. Unfortunately, it does not >> look like Retrospect can do the job. Anyone have experience with >> other solutions or have any suggestions? > >Run Samba

Re: Unix?

on 3/5/2000 10:19 AM, Moe Rubenzahl at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I need to set up tape backup for a web site which runs on four Sun > Solaris Unix boxes and one NT machine. Unfortunately, it does not > look like Retrospect can do the job. Anyone have experience with > other solutions or have any

Re: Unix?

on 3/5/00 8:19 AM, Moe Rubenzahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I need to set up tape backup for a web site which runs on four Sun > Solaris Unix boxes and one NT machine. Unfortunately, it does not > look like Retrospect can do the job. Anyone have experience with > other solutions or have any sug