Hi, All.
I had tried to use post-review to product a ReviewRequest after the code has
been commited to CVS Repository. The original version of source file is 1.1, I
chengd the file and commited again, The version on CVS repository then is 1.2;
So I use the command:
#post-review
Hi,Christian.
Is this bug fixed in ReviewBoard version 1.11? If not, How do I fix it? As
the method that mentioned by onkarshinde?
Best Regards!
在2009-12-17，Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com 写道：
Known bug. See http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=762
Christian
--
Thanks Chris,
But We need that the loged user and the submiter to be the same user. We
are desiring detaied permission control on ReviewBoard, So that if the loged
user has no derect relation with one ReviewRequest, He will never see it. So we
should make judge whether the loged on user is
Just installed the latest nightly, no joy with private GitHub repos. I tried
both with one that I own and one that I'm a user on that's owned by someone
else. In both cases I got A repository was not found at the specified path.
I'm not a python guy; anything I can do to help chase this? It's
Hi, Scott,
I want to know, If we set all those code-review process after code
commition, We do post-commit review, Then how to realize that?
I had use post-review to generate a post-commit review request for specific
files, But failed.
My command is:
post-review --debug
I would suggest taking a look at:
http://linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2003/06/05/scripts.html
This requires some scripting on your part. Our script queries our bug
tracking system (ClearQuest) and validates that the bugid is valid and that
the bug is in the correct state (Code Review) and that
qhlonline wrote:
在2009-12-23，Chris Clark chris.cl...@ingres.com 写道：
Try the --submit-as flag instead. e.g.:
post-review --submit-as=A myfile
post-review --submit-as=B myfile
But We need that the loged user and the submiter to be the same
user. We are desiring detaied
Are you using GitHub or GitHub (Private)? Can you check the log file
and see which URL it tried to access, and compare that with the Your
Clone URL?
Christian
On Wednesday, December 23, 2009, Mike Gunderloy larkw...@gmail.com wrote:
Just installed the latest nightly, no joy with private GitHub
Aha, I don't even see GitHub (Private). So I'd guess that somewhere I missed
a step in getting a nightly running.
- I had a 1.1 developer release installed
- easy_install -f http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/ -U ReviewBoard
- rb-site upgrade /path/to/site
- restarted apache
-
Hi,
I am currently demo'ing review board to interface with our Perforce
server.
I seems that using post-review with a command like the following:
post-review --username=USERNAME --server=reviewboard 65428
tries to access the api at a subfolder with the same name as the
servers name itself, so in
prestomation wrote:
I am currently demo'ing review board to interface with our Perforce
server.
I seems that using post-review with a command like the following:
post-review --username=USERNAME --server=reviewboard 65428
tries to access the api at a subfolder with the same name as the
Hi,All.
I am trying to using ReviewBoard 1.0.5.1. I use post-review tool to create
review requests. I had first created a user account John1 and give it the
permission of reviwes|review request| can submit as another user, Then I
created another user John3, The command is:
post-review
Hi,
I have learned the ReviewBoard documents again. It support post-commit
review (with the post-review tool) in this way:
post-review --revision-range=Begin_Revision:End_Revision
Thus It seems that I can't designate some files to be reviewed after their
commitment, Instead, All
Thanks Scott，The method you provided seems doing pre-commit review. But now we
have changed our idea. We want do automation on post-commit review. Thus, If
somebody has commmited his code, a CVS post-commit script will be stimulated
and post a review request for this user. Now the key problem
14 matches
Mail list logo
