--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4871/
--
New update by pfee
For Beanbag, Inc. > RBTools > Ticket #4871
Reply:
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4871/
--
New ticket #4871 by pfee
For Beanbag, Inc. > RBTools
Status: New
Tags:
I've recently been posting large diffs for colleagues to review and had the
same thoughts about being able to set the order of the files and perhaps
annotate the code for the benefit of those reviewing my work.
I'm currently using RB2.0. Would upgrading to RB3.0 help or are there
plans to
Fantastic achievement Christian, David and everyone else that has
contributed. We use Reviewboard on a daily basis and it helps greatly with
getting developers to engage in the review process.
Well done and keep up the good work.
Thank you,
Paul
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power
Hi Stephen,
That's great news, I had been wondering if Fedora/RHEL users would be
seeing RB2.5 soon.
On Fedora, it looks like the Django packages have moved ahead to 1.8, but
RB still needs 1.6. Hence ReviewBoard has disappeared from Fedora from F22
onwards :(
Nice to see that the situation
).
Are there particular fixes you're interested in?
Christain
--
Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript:
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:30 AM, Paul Fee paul@gmail.com
javascript: wrote:
Hi Christian,
I see
Hi Christian,
I see this line in the 2.5 Beta 2 release notes:
* Diff Viewer - Fixed some problems with interdiffs resulting from rebased
changes
Are these fixes applicable to the 1.7 release branch?
Thanks,
Paul
On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 7:54:36 PM UTC+1, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On
Hi all,
I'm using ReviewBoard 2.0.17 and see unexpected behaviour in the diff
viewer.
Steps to reproduce:
1. Change a few files (I'm using SVN)
2. rbt post changelist
3. Publish review
4. Delete a group of lines from one of the files already changed.
5. rbt post -r ID changelist
6. Publish
this by
clearing your browser cache, or did you have to restart memcached?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com javascript:
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
-Original Message-
From: Paul Fee paul
Hi Christian,
I'm seeing some buggy behaviour around the caching of diffs. It looks like
a server side problem as the buggy diff content persists even if I reload
with CTRL-F5 or switch browsers (e.g. firefox to chromium).
Steps to reproduce:
1. Change some code, I happen to be using SVN.
2.
Hi Stephen,
The 2.0.17 packages for EPEL7 worked as expected, karma dispensed.
Thanks to all those that contributed to 2.0.16 and 2.0.17, I especially
liked the fixes to the interdiff version selector as that was bugging me.
The performance improvements are also nice to see.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Hi Stephen,
EPEL7 upgrade didn't work for me. Negative karma and details of haystack
dependency issue here.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6685/ReviewBoard-2.0.16-1.el7,python-djblets-0.8.19-1.el7,python-django-evolution-0.7.5-1.el7
Forgive the formatting, I see bodhi
Hi David,
Both ReviewBoard-2.0.13-1.el7
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-0798/ReviewBoard-2.0.13-1.el7,python-djblets-0.8.15-1.el7?_csrf_token=ece4520dac50305f9779aaadf86012cee633767e
and RBTools-0.7.1-1.el7
Hi all (and Stephen),
Looks like there are problems beyond SELinux here. However in case you
haven't already, you'll need adjust SELinux so that httpd (which is running
the RB Django code via mod_wsgi) is allowed make outbound TCP connections
to port 25.
$ sudo setsebool -P
12:44:46 AM UTC, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 04:33 -0700, Paul Fee wrote:
Hi Stephen et al.,
I'm trying to get a CentOS7+EPEL install procedure that involves
minimal setup. My aim is to get most functionality into the distro
packages so that manual steps
Hi Stephen,
Your fix has resolved the issue on my system. Thanks for the rapid
response.
Cheers,
Paul
On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 11:39:53 PM UTC, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 16:27 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 11:04 -0700, Paul Fee
Hi Stephen et al.,
I'm trying to get a CentOS7+EPEL install procedure that involves minimal
setup. My aim is to get most functionality into the distro packages so
that manual steps are reduced. Thanks for the bugs fixes and support so
far.
Here's a list of the manuals steps still necessary.
Hi all (and Stephen Gallagher),
I'm using CentOS7 + EPEL with ReviewBoard-2.0.11 (fresh install + today's
updates). My site is listed in /etc/reviewboard/sites. When httpd starts
up, it checks if any sites need upgraded. I'm using a mariadb database.
When I reboot the box, httpd fails to
Hi Stephen,
I don't recall exact details, but I've seen the rb-site upgrade command
fail on occasion. I think in my case the sequence was:
* yum update [Included a reviewboard update]
* reboot
* While httpd service was starting rb-site upgrade was invoked.
* rb-site upgrade failed
Hi Stephen,
Nice to see RBTools packaged for EPEL7. What's the status of ReviewBoard2
for EPEL7? Need any help?
Thanks,
Paul
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user?
Thanks Stephen and Christian, I've downloaded the rawhide updates from Koji
and confirmed they've fixed this issue.
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know
they're both owned by
python-djblets-0.8.1-1.fc21.noarch.
Thanks,
Paul
On 2 June 2014 14:14, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote:
On 05/30/2014 01:58 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 05/30/2014 12:57 PM, Paul Fee wrote:
Hi all,
On my Fedora rawhide system with RB2.0
Thank you Christian and Stephen,
I'm now able to upgrade my RB1.5 database to RB2.0 using the packages from
Fedora Rawhide.
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let
Thanks, it's working now following the python-djblets-0.8-7 update.
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You
Hi Stephen,
I updated a rawhide machine to ReviewBoard-2.0-12.fc21.noarch.
Upon invoking rb-site, instead of usage help, I get the following error:
===
$ rb-site
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/rb-site, line 5, in module
from pkg_resources import
Hi all,
I'm attempting a Reviewboard 1.5-2.0 migration. An old server has RB1.5
I'm testing moving the data to a new RB2.0RC3 server.
Old server details:
Ubuntu 10.04
Manual installation of Reviewboard 1.5
Dump database: $ mysqldump -u admin -p reviewboard
/tmp/reviewboard.mysql.dump
Edit
, and not one we really have control
over during upgrade.
Christian
On Thursday, May 1, 2014, Paul Fee paul.f@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Christian,
I found your fix on github and manually applied the change to rbsite.py
https://github.com/reviewboard/reviewboard/commit
Hi Christian,
I found your fix on github and manually applied the change to rbsite.py
https://github.com/reviewboard/reviewboard/commit/11a850ca279416feed96beae9efd6c4c1f188f15
Repeating the procedure allows rb-site upgrade to get past the previous
error:
django.db.utils.OperationalError:
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Paul Fee paul.f@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I was testing migration from a 1.5 system to 2.0RC2.
I took a mysql dump from the old system and copied it to the new system
Hi all,
I'm testing a migration from 1.5 to 1.7.22.
Summary of migration steps.
Old system:
=
Ubuntu 10.04
Manual installation of Reviewboard 1.5
Dump database: $ mysqldump -u admin -p reviewboard
/tmp/reviewboard.mysql.dump
New system (separate host, don't want to risk in place
Hi all,
I was testing migration from a 1.5 system to 2.0RC2.
I took a mysql dump from the old system and copied it to the new system.
Following an rb-site install on the new system, I dropped and recreated
the reviewboard database, then tried rb-site upgrade path.
This procedure worked on
Also, on review notification emails, people get email to them and the group
gets CCed. Which fits what the OP asked for.
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us
MPM. Do you think
4000 is too large a number for MaxRequetsPerChild?
--Steve
On Wednesday, September 11, 2013 2:15:35 AM UTC-7, Paul Fee wrote:
Your httpd.conf suggests you've got mod_status enabled. Therefore visit
the /server-status URL on your web server. This should cause Apache
Your httpd.conf suggests you've got mod_status enabled. Therefore visit
the /server-status URL on your web server. This should cause Apache httpd
to provide a page that summarises the status of all its workers. That may
help you understand why you've got more httpd processes than expected.
34 matches
Mail list logo
