Thanks for responding Christian.
We're running Python 2.7.18
Thanks!
On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 4:47:23 PM UTC-4 Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Looks like they (hooks.slack.com) moved to Let's Encrypt on March 14th.
> Your server is likely lacking the root
Running version 3.0.24 on Windows Server 2019
(apologies if this has already been posted, it looked like my first post
disappeared).
We've lost visibility from our Slack Integration with Reviewboard since
March 14th.
The logs show a repeat of this:
- root - Failed to send notification:
and
now all is well. Thanks again for your reply. That was the clue that set us
on the right track to resolve the issue.
On Friday, March 3, 2017 at 4:01:22 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> Are older diffs in Review Board able to load? (Ones that would have fallen
&g
Not sure what has changed in our configuration or repository that could be
the problem. We have been using reviewboard for a couple of years. In the
past couple of days, "rbt post" is failing for multiple users with:
rbtools.commands.CommandError: Error validating diff
The specified diff file
TypeError: TypeError('isinstance() arg 2 must be a class,
type, or tuple of classes and types',) in bound method
Signal._remove_receiver of django.dispatch.dispatcher.Signal object
at 0x7f8819587750 ignored
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Greg Jacobs gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com
wrote:
One
'}
This seemed to resolve my issue. Had noticed (I was root when doing update)
root had group perms to assets again.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Greg Jacobs gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com
wrote:
That did the trick ( ReviewBoard==2.5b2) ... so PEBKAC on my end.
Thanks all!
So I upgraded a test 2.5
be of
assistance.
http://pastebin.com/kRqq6vfG
On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 8:56:37 AM UTC-4, Greg Jacobs wrote:
I should also note, I do have markdown installed and working correctly
etc. Beta1 ran fine prior.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:53 AM, gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com wrote
), as a lot has changed
involving package versioning and location since 3.3.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Greg Jacobs
gjac
://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
*Greg Jacobs* | Test Engineering Manager | Clearpath Robotics, Inc.
1425 Strasburg Rd., Suite 2A, Kitchener, Ontario N2R 1H2 Canada
*T: * 519-513-2416 x861 | *E:* gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com | *W:*
www.clearpathrobotics.com
*Your Unmanned Experts **TM
. Is this a
known bug?
Greg
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed
.
Thanks,
Greg
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed
rbtools be able to determine the
current git branch in the local environment? What is the default behavior
if we do not specify BRANCH in the .reviewboardrc file?
Thanks,
Greg
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 3:27:01 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Greg,
Which version of RBTools are you guys
forgot to show our rbtools version:
$ rbt --version
RBTools 0.6
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You
Also, all devs use origin for the central repo.
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 3:58:42 PM UTC-4, Greg Burcher wrote:
forgot to show our rbtools version:
$ rbt --version
RBTools 0.6
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board
Thanks David, that gets me going.
On Saturday, February 15, 2014 5:03:45 PM UTC-8, David Trowbridge wrote:
Greg,
You're probably getting hit by case mismatches (
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3221). We'll be
fixing this for 0.5.8.
-David
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014
://www.beanbaginc.com
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Greg g...@kinostudios.com wrote:
So.. wait, let's take a step back. Are you using a GitLab repository here,
or are you specifying a standard Git repository and pointing to the local
path, or are you specifying an SSH or git protocol path
left is to get it working with my git repo. GitLab doesn't
work because of the problem in mentioned in the Re: Adding gitlab account
error thread.
Workarounds appreciated!
Thanks again,
Greg
--
Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with
the NSA.
On Feb 13
diffs.
Cheers,
Greg
--
Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with
the NSA.
On Feb 13, 2014, at 2:11 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
I don't mean to run it in place of fastcgi. Run it as its own port, separate
from the fastcgi server
Hi there, I've updated to 0.5.7 and I'm running from cygwin and I get the
same result. Can rbt be run from cygwin? Here is what I get:
$ rbt post -d -o 299074
DEBUG:root:Checking for a Subversion repository...
DEBUG:root:Checking for a Git repository...
DEBUG:root:Checking for a Mercurial
? Where is this documented?
What do I put for the bug tracker URL?
Not a single example is given. :(
Thanks,
Greg
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 4:33:04 AM UTC-6, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Juia,
This is likely a PyCrypto-related issue. It's fortunately not
GitLab-specific, and can likely
I first setup my site to use files as caching, but then the docs convinced me
to change to memcached.
I set the value for memcaches location to:
unix:/tmp/memcached.sock
It saved, and the site continued to work for a while (including the admin
area), but all of a sudden it stopped
(for both 'files' and 'location:port').
Thanks,
Greg
--
Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with
the NSA.
On Feb 13, 2014, at 12:53 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Hi Greg,
Review Board expects the usage of an address:port
So what does that mean for nginx users?
I already spent a day getting this thing working with nginx. :-\
--
Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with
the NSA.
On Feb 13, 2014, at 12:55 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Hi Greg,
We're
to this?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Greg g...@kinostudios.com wrote:
Err... what's the reason for rbssh? I think I have password
24 matches
Mail list logo
