On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 21:09, Brad Hards br...@frogmouth.net wrote:
On Wednesday 18 January 2012 02:08:50 Thilo-Alexander Ginkel wrote:
When disabling TLS, everything works like expected.
Are you just enabling / disabling TLS?
Yes.
Any ideas? Do I need to register the AD DC's CA certificate
Hi there,
we are currently trying to switch Review Board from the Standard
Registration mechanism to Active Directory Authentication.
Unfortunately, this only seems to work as long as TLS is not enabled.
The Domain Controller seems to support TLS and according to tcpdump I
can see some data being
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 23:01, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
I don't believe they're stored temporarily anywhere. If so, it's internal to
Django and I don't know it off-hand.
The only thing I've ever seen permission-wise is when there's a directory
within media/uploaded that
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 18:55, s...@pobox.com wrote:
(Using Subversion...)
I have some code checked in on a branch. Before merging back to trunk I
would like to create a review request for the merge. It's not clear at all
to me how I would do that with post-review (or even using the form
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 09:22, Mohan mohan...@gmail.com wrote:
Only RB is running on the server.
when i did 'ps' it shows the following apache instances.
[r...@rboard log]# ps -ef | grep httpd
apache 1279 22272 0 01:51 ? 00:00:03 /usr/sbin/httpd
apache 12843 22272 0 07:29 ?
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 07:53, Mohan mohan...@gmail.com wrote:
I have noticed that high memory usage on this machine.
[r...@rboard ~]# free
total used free shared
buffers cached
Mem: 5760760 5726016 34744 0 220
Ginkel th...@ginkel.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 19:02, Thilo-Alexander Ginkel th...@ginkel.com
wrote:
ACK. I have set up a test installation based on production data and
will play around with it a little over the next days to pinpoint what
exactly went wrong.
After some further
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 15:29, mohan kumar mohan...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your response.
apache (httpd) uses more cpu and memory:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
14071 apache 25 0 449m 116m 6124 R 89.0 2.1 0:34.34 httpd
Hm, just had a
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 19:02, Thilo-Alexander Ginkel th...@ginkel.com wrote:
ACK. I have set up a test installation based on production data and
will play around with it a little over the next days to pinpoint what
exactly went wrong.
After some further investigation it seems that mod_python
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 15:18, Al West a...@tsew.net wrote:
Okay so at least I know it works! I did try using LDAP settings but
it's only my second time using LDAP on Linux so I was getting the
parameters wrong and locked myself out a few times. How does one
reset the authentication settings
Hi Christian,
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 08:15, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
We don't have any permission enforcement for submitting review requests, so
I can't imagine what would be causing that problem. Nor can I imagine why
everything would be using your admin user. These are
Hi Alex,
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 16:47, Alex atrof...@gmail.com wrote:
Exception Type: KeyError at /admin/db/scmtools/repository/add/
Exception Value: 'tool'
I guess your scmtools on the database is empty. I have seen this once
on a test upgrade - I guess something went wrong during the
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 09:15, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
We just released Review Board 1.5! A lot went into this release, and I think
it turned out really well.
Congratulations and thanks a lot for the continued effort of all contributors!
Regards,
Thilo
--
Want to help the
On Thursday 02 September 2010 21:09:59 Christian Hammond wrote:
I want to first make sure we're both clear on what you're trying to do and
what you can do. Review Board can't post to bug trackers today. It's a way
to link to existing bug trackers, so that if someone references an existing
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:19, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
I know what other people have done is written custom auth backends to talk
to a central database for users, so instead of creating/updating users in
Review Board based on redmine's data, you'd just have Review Board use
On Wednesday 30 June 2010 20:34:31 Christian Hammond wrote:
You actually can add a user in LDAP who is not in Review Board as a
reviewer. They won't appear in the autocomplete, but if you type the
name it will work. Review Board checks the auth backend for any
unrecognized names that are
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 21:47, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.com wrote:
There aren't any better ways to do it, since this is kind of contrary
to the use cases we had when building RB. I personally like it when
more than one person looks at a review--more eyes means more bugs are
caught early
On Thursday 25 February 2010 01:55:42 Pv wrote:
I am pretty sure this aborts in RBTools itself before it ever gets to
the server.
Again, a manual upload of the diff file to the server works fine.
Could http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1298/ have caused this?
Regards,
Thilo
--
Want to help
On Tuesday 26 January 2010 18:55:20 Kunjal wrote:
Here is my config looks like:
[core]
repositoryformatversion = 0
filemode = true
bare = false
logallrefupdates = true
[remote origin]
url =
On Friday 15 January 2010 23:20:32 Sassan wrote:
I am also thinking it might be a good idea to add a repository
independent base functionality to the post-review script where it is
handed the root directory of two source trees, before and after the
change and it will then just compare the
Hi,
IIRC the root cause for this issue is that your Lucene version is too new.
Using the latest 2.x version should do the trick.
Regards,
Thilo
On 10 Jan 2010 03:56, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
We want to enable search in RB. We are having issues.
I've finally built
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 23:11, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
It should just be the field constraints from those FileFields. We don't do
any custom validation checks in those forms that I can see.
It could potentially fail if the diff itself is empty, even though the name
is
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 15:28, Thilo-Alexander Ginkel th...@ginkel.com wrote:
The question is, how can I calculate the length of this string in
bytes, not characters, taking the wire encoding into account?
A patch is available at: http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1298/
Regards,
Thilo
--
Want
On Wednesday 02 December 2009 02:18:17 Kunjal wrote:
We are on verge of rolling out RB 1.0.5 to 300+ developers.
Some of our developers use IE and some of them use FireFox.
Does RB 1.0.5 work with both browser seamless?
During my testing I did not find the difference but I might have
missed
Hello everyone,
I just stumbled across a problem while using Review Board 1.0.5.1 that
seems to be related to the retrieval of diffs while the diff viewer is
loading. The retrieval of the third file in my diff list seems to
trigger a Javascript error, which I can see in my browser's error
console
On Monday 16 November 2009 11:50:36 developer 236 wrote:
i installed p4 tool also @ the server m/c, but still getting the same
error. The p4 is also in path environment variable.
Is the PATH modification also visible to the Apache process hosting Review
Board? I don't know which OS you are
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 03:37, Akhilesh akhileshjo...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm having some trouble setting up integrated authentication with AD.
Here is what I have done-
1. joined VM hosting ReviewBoard site to company.com
2. From Admin menu, set Authentication method = Active Directory
3. Set
On Friday 13 November 2009 17:36:17 Akhilesh wrote:
Thanks Thilo for reply. I see that Find DC from DNS remains
disabled. How do I enable it?
IIRC you need to install pydns (e.g., using easy_install).
Regards,
Thilo
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Want to help the
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 14:12, Paolo Borelli paolo.bore...@gmail.com wrote:
I upgraded to 1.0.5 and I am having problems... Creating new review
requests from the web interface fails: after selecting the file, when
you press the Create Review Request simply nothing happens, no error
Hello everyone,
I was thinking about adding search support to our Review Board
installation, which would require the installation of PyLucene. Has
somebody succeeded in getting this working on a Windows-based
platform?
Thanks,
Thilo
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Want to
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:20, Thilo-Alexander Ginkel th...@ginkel.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 22:21, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
That's odd.. I'll try to reproduce that tonight or this weekend.
I just tried reproducing the issue, but was not successful. So
Hello everyone,
can somebody confirm my observation that clicking on any of the Expand
hyperlinks (to expand collapsed source code sections) in the RB diff viewer
no longer works with 1.0.3?
Thanks,
Thilo
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 17:31, Thilo-Alexander Ginkel th...@ginkel.comwrote:
can somebody confirm my observation that clicking on any of the Expand
hyperlinks (to expand collapsed source code sections) in the RB diff viewer
no longer works with 1.0.3?
Just a brief update: The root cause
On Friday 25 September 2009 21:38:35 Christian Hammond wrote:
This is a standard diff, not an interdiff?
Yes, it's a standard diff.
One interesting thing is that for requests created prior to 1.0.3 the fragment
expansion still seems to work (I just tried a couple of requests, though).
Only
On Friday 25 September 2009 22:11:01 Christian Hammond wrote:
Were you trying to expand a diff that was still attached to a draft of a
review request? Or was it actually a published diff visible to everyone?
It was a published diff visible to everyone (actually a colleague pointed me
to the
Hello everybody,
I was wondering whether there are any best practices or experiences on how to
support multiple projects (within the same organization) with a Review Board
installation (the developers working on each project are typically different
people).
Would you try to fit everything
On Wednesday 19 August 2009 23:03:33 Dana Lacoste wrote:
So, I have everything working (from trunk, with a patch that I've
uploaded for review :) to get my perforce users working with
reviewboard. That is, I can, from Windows, run post-review and create
a review with a diff.
WooHoo!
The
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 23:53, Christian Hammondchip...@chipx86.com wrote:
It sounds like it's actually using the ClearCase SCM instead of your own.
Are you sure your repository entry is still mapping to your custom SCM?
In 1.0, we accidentally left out the database entry for the ClearCase
Hello everybody,
since upgrading from 1.0rc2 to 1.0.1 I have trouble posting reviews to
RB using a custom post-review implementation. The problem is that the
JSON response does not contain too many error details, just:
{fields: {path: [substring not found]}, stat: fail, err:
{msg: One or more
Hello Christian,
On Wednesday 12 August 2009 22:25:03 Christian Hammond wrote:
There's another thread on this problem as well. Are you using ClearCase?
no, this happens with a proprietary SCM, for which I added support to RB and
post-review. So, I cannot rule out that my scm implementation is
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 06:44, Nathan Heijermans nheijerm...@gmail.com wrote:
This basically sound like what I intend to implement. Would you mind sharing
some patches?
I just uploaded my patch to http://reviews.review-board.org/r/938/.
Thanks! I will try your changes once I have updated my
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 13:27, rupert.thurnerrupert.thur...@gmail.com wrote:
just as a side note, edgewall trac supports it by just taking the
webservers authentication, see:
* http://trac.edgewall.org/browser/trunk/trac/web/auth.py.
*
Hello everybody,
while attempting to add some basic support for a proprietary SCM to
Review Board / post-review I stumbled over one issue that I'm
currently uncertain how to solve: The SCM I'm integrating uses change
identifiers, which are not numeric. Instead arbitrary strings are
used, which
On May 11, 9:55 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
With this SCM, is the change identifier a server-stored ID that contains the
description and other information for Review Board to parse? Or is it more
like an atomic ID representing that change that gets pushed to the server
44 matches
Mail list logo
