508382 2022] [:error] [pid 1856] [client
10.103.108.170:60804] ImportError: cannot import name py31compat, referer:
https://10.103.100.250/
Dátum: pondelok 27. júna 2022, čas: 15:38:50 UTC+2, odosielateľ: Martin
Marusinec
> Hello,
>
> what is the correct method to upgrade from 3.0.20 to 4
Hello,
what is the correct method to upgrade from 3.0.20 to 4.0.7 ? I inherited
the server and was asked to upgrade, however the method described in the
documentation (pip upgrade ...) does not work, it fails with python errors.
I understood the 3.x runs with python 2.7 and 4.x runs with python
\git.py",
line 1261, in _execute*
*return execute(cmdline, cwd=self._git_toplevel, *args, **kwargs)*
* File "C:\Program Files
(x86)\RBTools\Python27\lib\site-packages\rbtools-1.0.3-py2.7.egg\rbtools\utils\process.py",
line 155, in execute*
***popen_encoding_args)*
* F
Hi Eric,
thanks for your reply. As it was not top priority to migrate all the old
data to the new version I installed a fresh, empty 3.0 instance and
restored the old 1.7 instance to an at least working state for archive
purposes.
Kind regards,
Martin
Am Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2019 19:43:12 UTC+2
t least an
unfinished upgrade to 1.7.27 with an inconsistent state in between. Version
was rolled back to 1.7.14 then, but maybe some artifacts remained, which
are causing the current trouble.
Am Montag, 3. Juni 2019 15:28:47 UTC+2 schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
>
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 a
django-evolution.noarch 1:0.6.9-4.el6 @epel
python-django-pipeline.noarch 1.2.24-2.el6 @epel
Do you have any idea what's going wrong here? I'm grateful for any ideas
how to solve this problem.
Extra question: I expected an upgrade t
I get the impression ReviewBoard's support for P4 is extrememly limited.
Is there any way to get a list of changes in the RB menu such that users
can simply choose one without resorting to command line tools and being
forced to post review requests manually?
Also, no matter what I do with RBToo
New to Review Board and trying to get LDAP config to work.
in log file getting
2017-03-31 10:14:41,923 - WARNING - - LDAP error: {'desc': "Can't contact LDAP
server"}
I know the parameters I use are correct since they are used elsewhere
ldap://host:389
Bindaccount accountusedbefore
pass
pository_access_control
group_site
repository_hosting_accounts
repository_extra_data_null
In the end my ReviewBoard installation is broken and responds with a 500
error when I try to access the dashboard.
Martin
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
htt
s, 30 de abril de 2015, 9:05:32 (UTC+2), Fernando Martin escribió:
>
> It looks like a problem with the repositories config. I'm using Bitbucket,
> when I try to modify something in the repository configurations I'm getting
> same error:
>
> 'ascii' codec ca
database in other server it seems there are
problems with thebitbucket repositories. I cannot mofify them and most of
the reviews show also this same error.
Any advice would be much appreciated.
El miércoles, 29 de abril de 2015, 20:38:54 (UTC+2), Fernando Martin
escribió:
>
> Hi all,
Hi all,
I've created a backup of my Review Board files and the database, then I've
installed same Review board version (2.0.8) into other server and restored
these files there.
Everything works okay excepting that I'm getting lots of errors like this
one when showing the diffs of my previous
Hi all,
1. User A is posting a review: post #1.
2. All the users receive an email from User A about this post #1.
3. User B is modifying the summary of this post #1.
4. All the users receive an email again from* User A *about this change
in post #1.
I'd like to change point #4 s
Looks like it's not even a matter of hours, but minutes (around 20-30). I'm
starting to think the timezone is not the problem. Is there a minimum
version of Bazaar required or recommended?
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user?
When trying to create a new review request on recently updated files on my
bazaar repository, I get the error: Requested revision: 'date:2013-07-04
19:23:10' does not exist in branch:
It seems to be a problem related to timezone. My bazaar repository is in
UTC (I don't want to change it since
Keith, did you contribute these scripts back to the project? They sound
quite useful for anyone trying to link Rational tools to reviewboard.
Best regards,
Ryan Martin
On Friday, April 12, 2013 12:14:41 PM UTC-4, Keith Moyer wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, April 2, 2012 9:12:02 AM UTC-6,
enabled logging with severity DEBUG, but the log file of the
reviewboard remains empty.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Martin
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users
I'm getting this error on a fresh install of 1.7.6. rb-site install didn't
report any problems (though I didn't see it creating this table).
Versions:
Python 2.6.6, Django 1.4.5, Djblets 0.7.11
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy
mits a new revision that person gets a review request as
well.
Is there a way to exclude the person that was specified in the post-review
command line as '--submit-as' from receiving his own review?
Thank you,
Martin Hoffesommer
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
htt
Hi group, I want to check if summary of each new review request is
compliant with a defined structure.
It could be performed using regular expressions, for instance.
Does someone know if there is this feature or if there is a workaround to
do this?
Thanks in advance.
Regards.
MArtin
Hi, I have installed the RB 1.6.1.
I'm using LDAP autentication.
When I go to "All reviews request", in the "people" column, I see the
userId, but I want to see the first Name or LAst Name.
Does anybody knows how I can do this?
Thanks in advance.
Martin.
--
Want
Thanks a lot Chris.
I am managing my own instance of ReviewBoard, but, the LDAP is under the
client control.
So, the only chance to change the email is from the admin account.
I will tell you if I can figure out an alternative way.
Thanks you very much.
Regards.
MArtin.
--
Want to help
Hi, I'm using RB 1.6.1 with LDAP authentication.
I want to each user can modifiy his email address.
I tried add the users a group with auth|user|Can change user, but it still
not working...
Does somebody can help me?
Thanks in advance.
Martin.
--
Want to help the Review Board project? D
Upgraded to django_evolution 0.6.4, I mean. sorry.
On Jun 30, 11:14 am, martin wrote:
> beta1 upgrade was done through easy_install also.
>
> 1.5 and beta1 were using evolution 0.6.2, the rc1 install upgraded to
> evolution 0.6.2.
>
> On Jun 29, 5:27 pm, Christ
ution you have installed?
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:00 PM, martin wrote:
> > I updated
one release to another?
>
> >> What database are you using?
>
> >> What version of Review Board did you have installed prior to 1.6 beta 1?
>
> >> Christian
>
> >> --
> >> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
>
> >> Review Board
.
Run './manage.py evolve --hint --execute' to apply evolution.
On Jun 29, 12:20 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Those were added before beta 1, but I think the error may be misleading. It
> mentions "sessions", which is Django-supplied.
>
> Can you run:
>
>
When I run rb-site upgrade /my/site I get the following:
===
Rebuilding directory structure
Updating database. This may take a while.
Creating tables ...
Upgrading Review Board from 1.6 beta 1 to 1.6 RC1
There are unapplied evolutions for sessions.
There are unapplied evolutions for accounts.
Ther
Congratulations, I saw you customization and is great.
Do you know if there is something like that for git?
Thanks in advance.
Martin.
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users
Hi all.
I fixed the las error re- installing RBTools.
Now, when I try to execute post-review -o, I get
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/post-review", line 8, in
load_entry_point('RBTools==0.3.2', 'console_scripts', 'post-review')()
File
"/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages
The full debug log below
-bash-4.0$ cat AirStories.diff |post-review --debug --diff-filename=-
>>> RBTools 0.3.2
>>> Home = /home/hudsonhome
>>> svn info
>>> git rev-parse --git-dir
>>> git symbolic-ref -q HEAD
Failed to execute command: ['git', 'symbolic-ref', '-q', 'HEAD']
-bash-4.0$ echo $?
1
Before anything...
I configured my non-bare git repository in ReviewBoard. This repository is a
git svn clone of a central SVN repository.
I'm trying to execute a pre commit review, using the post-review commit with
the following syntax:
cat file.diff |post-review -d --diff-filename=-
Is this co
Nothing happens.
The command is executed but I don't get anything by the standar output.
Any else tip will be useful.
Thanks a lot.
MArtin.
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/
'HEAD']
I have configured mi git repo in ReviewBoard as a non-bare repository, in
fact, is a git svn clone of a central SVN.
Does anybody can help me, please?
Thanks in advance.
Martin.
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org
'HEAD']
I have configured mi git repo in ReviewBoard as a non-bare repository,
in fact, is a git svn clone of a central SVN.
Does anybody can help me, please?
Thanks in advance.
Martin.
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org
ranches I see all the differences.
Does anyone knows why this is failing?
The server runs 1.5.1 version.
Thanks,
Martin
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~-
. I thought we had worked around all of our cache size problems by
> splitting stuff up under multiple keys. What version are you running?
>
> -David
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Martin wrote:
>
> > Thank you, I will try the memcache parameters.
>
> > Swapping
Thank you, I will try the memcache parameters.
Swapping is not an issue for us. Used Swap is at 0KB. We have 4GB
memory in that server.
Thanks,
Martin
On Apr 2, 1:31 pm, ciaomary wrote:
> Provided your machine can handle it, i believe you can do this when
> starting memcache by setti
the software to store larger data?
Thanks,
Martin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
it seems that the syntax highlighting process takes quite a bit of
time.
I know it is 3rd party. Maybe that tool can be sped up as well.
On Apr 1, 4:37 pm, Martin wrote:
> for us it takes approximately a minute to view a diff of a file
> containing 24,260 lines of C code.
> Is
seconds.
Then, what is it doing in the 6 seconds between line 5 and 6?
Thanks,
Martin
On Mar 30, 6:26 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Thanks, it's great to hear this feedback :) I was really hoping those
> optimizations would improve things that noticeably.
>
> We'll continue
Hi Christian,
thank you so much!
It works again :)
Martin
On Mar 30, 2:16 am, Christian Hammond wrote:
> We've released beta 2, which should fix this. Go ahead and upgrade and make
> sure it works fine for you.
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@
I use django 1.0.2 final if that matters.
On Mar 30, 12:05 am, Martin wrote:
> after the easy_install I did
>
> [r...@vmcodereview ~]# rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviewboard
> Rebuilding directory structure
> Updating database
> Upgrading Review Board from 1.0alpha4 to 1.0beta1
I also restarted memcached.
On Mar 30, 12:06 am, Martin wrote:
> I use django 1.0.2 final if that matters.
>
> On Mar 30, 12:05 am, Martin wrote:
>
> > after the easy_install I did
>
> > [r...@vmcodereview ~]# rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviewboard
> > Rebuilding
hipx86.com
> Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
> VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Martin wrote:
>
> > the error points into the js code:
> > I added "[line 361:] " which firefox tells me where the error occurs.
>
>
})
.open(self.el);
})
.close();
},
On Mar 30, 12:08 am, Martin wrote:
> I also restarted memcached.
>
> On Mar 30, 12:06 am, Martin wrote:
>
> > I use django 1.0.2 final if that matters.
>
> > On Mar 30, 12:05 am, Martin wrote
-1.0beta1-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/
fixtures'.
Installed 6 object(s) from 1 fixture(s)
No evolution required.
On Mar 30, 12:04 am, Martin wrote:
> yes, I did.
>
> On Mar 29, 11:59 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> > Did you run `rb-site upgrade` on the new site and rest
ww.vmware.com
>
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Martin wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > when I click on a line of code in the diff viewer, I get this error
> > message in firefox 3 after upgrading to the first beta release:
>
> > Error: gCommentDlg.one("
same with IE7
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr
Hi,
when I click on a line of code in the diff viewer, I get this error
message in firefox 3 after upgrading to the first beta release:
Error: gCommentDlg.one("close", function ()
{gCommentDlg.setCommentBlock(self).css({left: $(document).scrollLeft()
+ ($(window).width() - gCommentDlg.width()) /
is it already fixed in the svn version?
bug issue 892 is still marked as 'new'.
Thanks,
Martin
On Feb 17, 5:42 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> I'll try to get to this sometime this week. You'll need to grab a nightly
> for the fix, because we're a ways off s
ah, somebody already opened a bug for this:
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=892
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewb
errors in httpd's error log.
Am I the only one experiencing that?
Thanks,
Martin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to review
Thanks a lot! This seems to work now.
Martin
On Feb 11, 11:26 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Okay, looks like the reviewboard.fcgi file isn't being generated correctly.
> Can you two edit that file and append "/conf/" to the path being inserted?
> For example:
>
>
Hi, I have got the same problem using lighthttpd and sqlite. I have
just followed the standard installation instructions.
Martin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"reviewboard" group.
To po
awesome!!
now, I am really looking forward to alpha3 :)
On Feb 6, 5:34 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Also fixed in last night's nightly.
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> VMware, Inc.
>
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Mar
ok cool, thank you!!
waiting for alpha3.
what timeframe do you have in your mind?
Thanks,
Martin
On Feb 6, 5:33 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> This should be fixed in last night's nightly. It's not actually jQuery, but
> our autoSizeTextArea widget. I'll be spinning an
I did run
django-admin.py compilemessages
being in /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0alpha2-
py2.4.egg/reviewboard
restarted httpd, but no luck :(
On Feb 6, 9:52 am, Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to replace some strings with my own strings (i.e. replace
> &quo
ecial other than maybe restart httpd to
apply the changes in the po file?
Thanks,
Martin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@g
Hi,
firefox 2 users might be unhappy with the new javascript library. Just
typing text into the Description field causes the CPU to become
extremely busy.
Has anybody noticed that as well?
Thanks,
Martin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because
eviewboard log file.
Anything else I can tell you>
I have alpha2 installed from the release date.
Thanks,
Martin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"reviewboard" group.
To post to th
gly* recommended, as it's what powers
> such things as Facebook and Youtube), you should only have that hit once per
> new diff.
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> VMware, Inc.
>
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Martin wrote:
>
&
thank you!! looks lovely!
migrating from a svn based install to rb-site/easy_install was a
breeze!
found and reported one bug (848) regarding not being able to delete
images from a review.
On Feb 3, 10:11 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> We've just put out the 1.0 alpha 2 relea
t 3 seconds. Our network is on a
gigabit switch and the svn and reviewboard servers are quite adjacent.
After downloading it for 3 seconds, it takes another 4 seconds to
render it :(
The file in question has 637 lines.
What can I do to speed things up? What could be the
meh, I think you can ignore this. I believe this is an issue while
compiling pylucene...
turns out I had some wrong paths while building jcc
sorry for the noise
On Jan 30, 10:41 am, Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I set up pylucene
> I added the path to libjava.so to /etc/ld.so.con
ATH, but I can't search, because mod_python ignores the
shared libs in ldconfig :(
Any help or pointers are appreciated.
Thanks,
Martin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"reviewboard&qu
issue is already closed!
Thanks for the quick fix, Christian!
On Jan 22, 8:38 am, Martin wrote:
> here it is
>
> http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=827
>
> thanks.
>
> On Jan 21, 4:54 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> > I'm surprised I mi
-
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> VMware, Inc.
>
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Martin wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > A colleague of mine just ran into that:
> > I had anonymous viewing of reviews and diffs enabled.
> > If you now view a diff as anonymo
are
not in the database).
Wouldn't it be better to turn off the ability to create comments when
you are not logged in?
My colleague spent half an hour creating comments, which he lost
because he didn't realize he was not logged in.
Than
Hi Christian,
thanks so much!
I'll update our server first thing in the morning.
How else do you get a trophy?
That was so neat to see that the st ID got a trophy :)
Thanks,
Martin
On Jan 16, 5:43 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hi Martin.
>
> There's a patch up to
packages/django/template/__init__.py" in
render
768. bits.append(self.render_node(node, context))
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/template/debug.py" in
render_node
81. raise wrapped
Exception Type: T
Hi Christian,
thank you!
Martin
On Dec 5, 4:24 pm, "Christian Hammond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> We had a patch up on Review Board that needs some changes made, but it also
> solves this issue. I think the author discarded it, though, so I don&
you could configure multiple review boards under different locations
which is to be configured in apache.
The only thing they would share is the apache and the mysql server.
On Dec 4, 2:36 am, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay. I just wondering better to have the functionality
Hi,
imagine a file containing sql code and comments
foo.sql:
--This is the comment
SELECT * FROM Foo;
Now you update the comment and create a diff of it:
diff -up foo2.sql foo.sql
--- foo2.sql2008-12-05 15:50:17.0 -0500
+++ foo.sql 2008-12-05 15:50:04.0 -0500
@@ -1,3
Okay. I just wondering better to have the functionality to avoid
security issue.
These teams can not access each others' code repository.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"reviewboard" group.
To post
Hi,
we setup a server for Review Board. And the Review Board will be used
by multi-teams. Is there any way to set permission for different team
and make them can only access their own projects related Requests?
thanks,
Martin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
nes!).
Our products include (but are not limited to) Flight Planning, and
Crew Scheduling. Some parts of our software are critical
to the operation of an Airline. Good code quality is essential. More
than 30 people use reviewboard and everybody really likes it.
Thank y
Hi,
How do you suggest to deal with the situation where person A marks the
review as "ship It" but person B disagrees with that.
I don't see a way to toggle the "Ship It" flag.
All he can do is start another discussion. Does that work best for
mos
hi,
I am new to this, would you mind providing a little howto?
I.e. how to install that file you created etc?
Thanks,
Martin
On Aug 11, 7:33 pm, teki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using a slightly modified LDAP backend:http://gist.github.com/4967
> With this settings:
>
&
point of time.
Martin
On Sep 8, 4:33 pm, Harry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let me add some clarification. I have many versions and many files
> checked in over the last several months. Do I have to determine the
> first revision number when the file was added? I tried:
>
80 matches
Mail list logo