Re: Review Board 2.5 beta 2 is out!
It's a harmless warning due to some garbage collection and some registered
signals. I tried fixing this once, but didn't have luck.
Can you file a bug on this, to help track it?
Thanks!
Christian
On Friday, July 24, 2015, Greg Jacobs gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com wrote:
Another bug noticed during index cron job execution with the beta2 2.5
release:
Output from command /usr/bin/python /usr/local/bin/rb-site manage
/var/www/reviews.clearpathrobotics.com update_index -- -a 1 ..
Indexing 11 users
Indexing 1 review requests
Exception TypeError: TypeError('isinstance() arg 2 must be a class, type, or
tuple of classes and types',) in bound method Signal._remove_receiver of
django.dispatch.dispatcher.Signal object at 0x7f9b106be750 ignored
Looks like index data was generated:
drwxr-xr-x 2 www-data www-data 4096 Jul 24 15:06 .
drwxr-xr-x 4 www-data www-data 4096 Jul 24 14:49 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 www-data www-data 7598 Jul 24 15:06 _MAIN_2.toc
-rw-r--r-- 1 www-data www-data 32089 Jul 24 15:06 MAIN_lus9ypwhsxh8aoou.seg
-rw-r--r-- 1 www-data www-data 16268 Jul 24 15:06 MAIN_rwa5uuswnd19j6kl.seg
-rwxr-xr-x 1 www-data www-data 0 Jul 24 15:06 MAIN_WRITELOCK
If you want logs let me know (do you want me to file in bug tracking
instead?)
I can also confirm same error with second cron job that cleans up old
sessions etc...
Output from command /usr/bin/python /usr/local/bin/rb-site manage
/var/www/reviews.clearpathrobotics.com clearsessions ..
Exception TypeError: TypeError('isinstance() arg 2 must be a class, type, or
tuple of classes and types',) in bound method Signal._remove_receiver of
django.dispatch.dispatcher.Signal object at 0x7f8819587750 ignored
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Greg Jacobs
gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com'); wrote:
One other note. I had to re-assert group ownership on the RB site, it was
breaking LDAP auth.
sudo chgrp -R www-data /var/www/your-site-name
I was getting the following in debug logs...
2015-07-23 13:35:57,514 - WARNING - - LDAP error: {'info': 'invalid DN',
'desc': 'Invalid DN syntax'}
This seemed to resolve my issue. Had noticed (I was root when doing
update) root had group perms to assets again.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Greg Jacobs
gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com'); wrote:
That did the trick ( ReviewBoard==2.5b2) ... so PEBKAC on my end.
Thanks all!
So I upgraded a test 2.5 beta1 system to beta2 by doing the following
for reference by others - you can give this blessing or scream that its a
bad idea:
sudo service apache2 stop
sudo easy_install \
-f http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/2.5/ \
-U ReviewBoard==2.5b2
sudo rb-site upgrade /var/www/your-existing-install-location
As far as output if anyone is curious...
-- begin log output --
Creating tables ...
Upgrading Review Board from 2.5 beta 1 to 2.5 beta 2
*There are unapplied evolutions for accounts.There are unapplied
evolutions for reviews.Project signature has changed - an evolution is
required*
Installing custom SQL ...
Installing indexes ...
Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)
Evolution successful.
--- end log output ---
Things seem to work fine, will continue to test on my end. Cheers.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Christian Hammond
christ...@beanbaginc.com
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','christ...@beanbaginc.com'); wrote:
Ah, looks like the problem is due to the package name you used. You
want ReviewBoard (or ReviewBoard==2.5b2) and not ReviewBoard-2.5b2.
The latter isn't being found as a package name, and it's trying hard to
fulfill the request by finding a source tarball matching the name given as
a last resort.
If you hit further problems, it's also probably worth upgrading your
version to setuptools (18.0.1 is the latest), as a lot has changed
involving package versioning and location since 3.3.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','christ...@beanbaginc.com');
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Greg Jacobs
gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com'); wrote:
# easy_install --version
setuptools 3.3
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Christian Hammond
christ...@beanbaginc.com
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','christ...@beanbaginc.com'); wrote:
Hi,
Looks like for whatever reason, your install pulled down an old
version of Djblets. It should have grabbed 0.9 beta 2, not beta 1.
The whole install process in your log looks questionable, though. It
pulled down the .tar.gz and not the .egg, which I'm surprised about. So,
that's also a problem. Review Board cannot be installed from a .tar.gz
without a
Re: Review Board 2.5 beta 2 is out!
Another bug noticed during index cron job execution with the beta2 2.5
release:
Output from command /usr/bin/python /usr/local/bin/rb-site manage
/var/www/reviews.clearpathrobotics.com update_index -- -a 1 ..
Indexing 11 users
Indexing 1 review requests
Exception TypeError: TypeError('isinstance() arg 2 must be a class,
type, or tuple of classes and types',) in bound method
Signal._remove_receiver of django.dispatch.dispatcher.Signal object
at 0x7f9b106be750 ignored
Looks like index data was generated:
drwxr-xr-x 2 www-data www-data 4096 Jul 24 15:06 .
drwxr-xr-x 4 www-data www-data 4096 Jul 24 14:49 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 www-data www-data 7598 Jul 24 15:06 _MAIN_2.toc
-rw-r--r-- 1 www-data www-data 32089 Jul 24 15:06 MAIN_lus9ypwhsxh8aoou.seg
-rw-r--r-- 1 www-data www-data 16268 Jul 24 15:06 MAIN_rwa5uuswnd19j6kl.seg
-rwxr-xr-x 1 www-data www-data 0 Jul 24 15:06 MAIN_WRITELOCK
If you want logs let me know (do you want me to file in bug tracking
instead?)
I can also confirm same error with second cron job that cleans up old
sessions etc...
Output from command /usr/bin/python /usr/local/bin/rb-site manage
/var/www/reviews.clearpathrobotics.com clearsessions ..
Exception TypeError: TypeError('isinstance() arg 2 must be a class,
type, or tuple of classes and types',) in bound method
Signal._remove_receiver of django.dispatch.dispatcher.Signal object
at 0x7f8819587750 ignored
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Greg Jacobs gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com
wrote:
One other note. I had to re-assert group ownership on the RB site, it was
breaking LDAP auth.
sudo chgrp -R www-data /var/www/your-site-name
I was getting the following in debug logs...
2015-07-23 13:35:57,514 - WARNING - - LDAP error: {'info': 'invalid DN',
'desc': 'Invalid DN syntax'}
This seemed to resolve my issue. Had noticed (I was root when doing
update) root had group perms to assets again.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Greg Jacobs
gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com wrote:
That did the trick ( ReviewBoard==2.5b2) ... so PEBKAC on my end.
Thanks all!
So I upgraded a test 2.5 beta1 system to beta2 by doing the following for
reference by others - you can give this blessing or scream that its a bad
idea:
sudo service apache2 stop
sudo easy_install \
-f http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/2.5/ \
-U ReviewBoard==2.5b2
sudo rb-site upgrade /var/www/your-existing-install-location
As far as output if anyone is curious...
-- begin log output --
Creating tables ...
Upgrading Review Board from 2.5 beta 1 to 2.5 beta 2
*There are unapplied evolutions for accounts.There are unapplied
evolutions for reviews.Project signature has changed - an evolution is
required*
Installing custom SQL ...
Installing indexes ...
Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)
Evolution successful.
--- end log output ---
Things seem to work fine, will continue to test on my end. Cheers.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Christian Hammond
christ...@beanbaginc.com wrote:
Ah, looks like the problem is due to the package name you used. You want
ReviewBoard (or ReviewBoard==2.5b2) and not ReviewBoard-2.5b2. The
latter isn't being found as a package name, and it's trying hard to fulfill
the request by finding a source tarball matching the name given as a last
resort.
If you hit further problems, it's also probably worth upgrading your
version to setuptools (18.0.1 is the latest), as a lot has changed
involving package versioning and location since 3.3.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Greg Jacobs
gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com wrote:
# easy_install --version
setuptools 3.3
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Christian Hammond
christ...@beanbaginc.com wrote:
Hi,
Looks like for whatever reason, your install pulled down an old
version of Djblets. It should have grabbed 0.9 beta 2, not beta 1.
The whole install process in your log looks questionable, though. It
pulled down the .tar.gz and not the .egg, which I'm surprised about. So,
that's also a problem. Review Board cannot be installed from a .tar.gz
without a bunch of extra packaging tools for the CSS/JavaScript also being
installed.
What does `easy_install --version` say?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 6:27 AM, gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com
wrote:
Pasted full logs here if that helps... Let me know how I can be of
assistance.
http://pastebin.com/kRqq6vfG
On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 8:56:37 AM UTC-4, Greg Jacobs wrote:
I should also note, I do have markdown installed and working
correctly etc. Beta1 ran fine prior.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:53 AM,
Re: Review Board 2.5 beta 2 is out!
Ah okay, that makes more sense. I've had reports of both issues. I've been spending time on the interdiff issue, and I know what's wrong. A bit tricky to fix, but I'm aiming for 2.0.19 for a fix there. For the caching issue, I need a solid, reliable retro case. I've tried debugging this before, but can't make it happen, and all caching keys should guarantee that replaced content would invalidate the cache. Let me know if you do manage to have a repro case, and we'll look into it further. Christian On Thursday, July 23, 2015, Paul Fee paul.f@gmail.com wrote: Hi Christian, I occasionally see bugs when using rbt post to push up multiple drafts before I publish. I suspect that a previous draft is cached server side, browser cache clearing and memcached restarts fail to fix the issue. Repeat use of rbt post following local code changes doesn't always result in visible changes on the interdiff web page. I haven't been able to reliably reproduce this and can't share the specific diffs in question as the code is private. Also, I've seen occasions where I can see the change in the side-by-side diff viewer (e.g. lines deleted), however the lines are not always colour coded to highlight the change as expected. I'm using RB 2.0.18. Sorry, I just noticed I previously asked if the 2.5 interdiff changes were relevant for RB1.7, I should have asked if they were relevant to RB2.0 as that's the version I've had interdiff viewing problems with. Thanks, Paul On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 9:35:30 PM UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Paul, These fixes are not. Interdiffs were largely rewritten since 1.7 and behave differently. We've had further changes since 2.0 (though we may backport some of these fixes). Are there particular fixes you're interested in? Christain -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:30 AM, Paul Fee paul@gmail.com wrote: Hi Christian, I see this line in the 2.5 Beta 2 release notes: * Diff Viewer - Fixed some problems with interdiffs resulting from rebased changes Are these fixes applicable to the 1.7 release branch? Thanks, Paul On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 7:54:36 PM UTC+1, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:30 PM Christian Hammond chri...@beanbaginc.com wrote: Hey everyone, We've put out the second beta of Review Board 2.5. We're hoping to wrap this release cycle up soon, get an RC out the door in the next two weeks and then ship the final 2.5 release shortly after. We'd love your testing to help make this happen. You can read our announcement, complete with screenshots, here: https://www.reviewboard.org/news/2015/07/20/review-board-2-5-beta-2-out/ We also have an announcements mailing list available, for those not on it: https://www.reviewboard.org/mailing-lists/ And as a reminder, we're posting the latest development news, feature additions, design ideas, etc. over at the Review Board ChangeLog: http://changelog.assembly.com/reviewboard I've also created a new COPR repository for Fedora 21+ and RHEL/CentOS 7. You can now download and install Review Board 2.5 beta 2 for evaluation on those platforms. Browse to https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/sgallagh/reviewboard2.5/ and install the appropriate repository file into /etc/yum.repos.d, then do 'yum install ReviewBoard'. If you already have Review Board on the target system, back it up and then just do 'yum update ReviewBoard' (after having installed the repo file, of course). Yum may prompt you to accept the signing key for these new packages; that key should be: f836 fa56 6e04 caa8 832f 6efd fa1d d63c 353c 6a28 -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- -- Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Review Board 2.5 beta 2 is out!
One other note. I had to re-assert group ownership on the RB site, it was
breaking LDAP auth.
sudo chgrp -R www-data /var/www/your-site-name
I was getting the following in debug logs...
2015-07-23 13:35:57,514 - WARNING - - LDAP error: {'info': 'invalid DN',
'desc': 'Invalid DN syntax'}
This seemed to resolve my issue. Had noticed (I was root when doing update)
root had group perms to assets again.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Greg Jacobs gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com
wrote:
That did the trick ( ReviewBoard==2.5b2) ... so PEBKAC on my end.
Thanks all!
So I upgraded a test 2.5 beta1 system to beta2 by doing the following for
reference by others - you can give this blessing or scream that its a bad
idea:
sudo service apache2 stop
sudo easy_install \
-f http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/2.5/ \
-U ReviewBoard==2.5b2
sudo rb-site upgrade /var/www/your-existing-install-location
As far as output if anyone is curious...
-- begin log output --
Creating tables ...
Upgrading Review Board from 2.5 beta 1 to 2.5 beta 2
*There are unapplied evolutions for accounts.There are unapplied
evolutions for reviews.Project signature has changed - an evolution is
required*
Installing custom SQL ...
Installing indexes ...
Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)
Evolution successful.
--- end log output ---
Things seem to work fine, will continue to test on my end. Cheers.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Christian Hammond
christ...@beanbaginc.com wrote:
Ah, looks like the problem is due to the package name you used. You want
ReviewBoard (or ReviewBoard==2.5b2) and not ReviewBoard-2.5b2. The
latter isn't being found as a package name, and it's trying hard to fulfill
the request by finding a source tarball matching the name given as a last
resort.
If you hit further problems, it's also probably worth upgrading your
version to setuptools (18.0.1 is the latest), as a lot has changed
involving package versioning and location since 3.3.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Greg Jacobs
gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com wrote:
# easy_install --version
setuptools 3.3
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Christian Hammond
christ...@beanbaginc.com wrote:
Hi,
Looks like for whatever reason, your install pulled down an old version
of Djblets. It should have grabbed 0.9 beta 2, not beta 1.
The whole install process in your log looks questionable, though. It
pulled down the .tar.gz and not the .egg, which I'm surprised about. So,
that's also a problem. Review Board cannot be installed from a .tar.gz
without a bunch of extra packaging tools for the CSS/JavaScript also being
installed.
What does `easy_install --version` say?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 6:27 AM, gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com wrote:
Pasted full logs here if that helps... Let me know how I can be of
assistance.
http://pastebin.com/kRqq6vfG
On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 8:56:37 AM UTC-4, Greg Jacobs wrote:
I should also note, I do have markdown installed and working
correctly etc. Beta1 ran fine prior.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:53 AM, gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com
wrote:
Is there an upgrade path from beta1 to beta2?
Running into the following error trying an upgrade ( I'll debug
further if sane path - else if not supported assuming nuke the Django
site
and leave db in place?)
The upgrade fails at:
File
/tmp/easy_install-LxFRjB/ReviewBoard-2.5b2/reviewboard/reviews/fields.py,
line 9, in module
from djblets.markdown import iter_markdown_lines
django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing module
djblets.extensions.staticfiles: No module named markdown
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/easy_install, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('setuptools==3.3', 'console_scripts',
'easy_install')()
On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 1:30:08 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond
wrote:
Hey everyone,
We've put out the second beta of Review Board 2.5. We're hoping to
wrap this release cycle up soon, get an RC out the door in the next two
weeks and then ship the final 2.5 release shortly after. We'd love your
testing to help make this happen.
You can read our announcement, complete with screenshots, here:
https://www.reviewboard.org/news/2015/07/20/review-board-2-5-beta-2-out/
We also have an announcements mailing list available, for those not
on it: https://www.reviewboard.org/mailing-lists/
And as a reminder, we're posting the latest development news,
feature additions, design ideas, etc. over at the Review Board
ChangeLog:
http://changelog.assembly.com/reviewboard
Re: Review Board 2.5 beta 2 is out!
Hi Christian, I occasionally see bugs when using rbt post to push up multiple drafts before I publish. I suspect that a previous draft is cached server side, browser cache clearing and memcached restarts fail to fix the issue. Repeat use of rbt post following local code changes doesn't always result in visible changes on the interdiff web page. I haven't been able to reliably reproduce this and can't share the specific diffs in question as the code is private. Also, I've seen occasions where I can see the change in the side-by-side diff viewer (e.g. lines deleted), however the lines are not always colour coded to highlight the change as expected. I'm using RB 2.0.18. Sorry, I just noticed I previously asked if the 2.5 interdiff changes were relevant for RB1.7, I should have asked if they were relevant to RB2.0 as that's the version I've had interdiff viewing problems with. Thanks, Paul On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 9:35:30 PM UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Paul, These fixes are not. Interdiffs were largely rewritten since 1.7 and behave differently. We've had further changes since 2.0 (though we may backport some of these fixes). Are there particular fixes you're interested in? Christain -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:30 AM, Paul Fee paul@gmail.com javascript: wrote: Hi Christian, I see this line in the 2.5 Beta 2 release notes: * Diff Viewer - Fixed some problems with interdiffs resulting from rebased changes Are these fixes applicable to the 1.7 release branch? Thanks, Paul On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 7:54:36 PM UTC+1, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:30 PM Christian Hammond chri...@beanbaginc.com wrote: Hey everyone, We've put out the second beta of Review Board 2.5. We're hoping to wrap this release cycle up soon, get an RC out the door in the next two weeks and then ship the final 2.5 release shortly after. We'd love your testing to help make this happen. You can read our announcement, complete with screenshots, here: https://www.reviewboard.org/news/2015/07/20/review-board-2-5-beta-2-out/ We also have an announcements mailing list available, for those not on it: https://www.reviewboard.org/mailing-lists/ And as a reminder, we're posting the latest development news, feature additions, design ideas, etc. over at the Review Board ChangeLog: http://changelog.assembly.com/reviewboard I've also created a new COPR repository for Fedora 21+ and RHEL/CentOS 7. You can now download and install Review Board 2.5 beta 2 for evaluation on those platforms. Browse to https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/sgallagh/reviewboard2.5/ and install the appropriate repository file into /etc/yum.repos.d, then do 'yum install ReviewBoard'. If you already have Review Board on the target system, back it up and then just do 'yum update ReviewBoard' (after having installed the repo file, of course). Yum may prompt you to accept the signing key for these new packages; that key should be: f836 fa56 6e04 caa8 832f 6efd fa1d d63c 353c 6a28 -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Review Board 2.5 beta 2 is out!
# easy_install --version
setuptools 3.3
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Christian Hammond christ...@beanbaginc.com
wrote:
Hi,
Looks like for whatever reason, your install pulled down an old version of
Djblets. It should have grabbed 0.9 beta 2, not beta 1.
The whole install process in your log looks questionable, though. It
pulled down the .tar.gz and not the .egg, which I'm surprised about. So,
that's also a problem. Review Board cannot be installed from a .tar.gz
without a bunch of extra packaging tools for the CSS/JavaScript also being
installed.
What does `easy_install --version` say?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 6:27 AM, gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com wrote:
Pasted full logs here if that helps... Let me know how I can be of
assistance.
http://pastebin.com/kRqq6vfG
On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 8:56:37 AM UTC-4, Greg Jacobs wrote:
I should also note, I do have markdown installed and working correctly
etc. Beta1 ran fine prior.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:53 AM, gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com wrote:
Is there an upgrade path from beta1 to beta2?
Running into the following error trying an upgrade ( I'll debug further
if sane path - else if not supported assuming nuke the Django site and
leave db in place?)
The upgrade fails at:
File
/tmp/easy_install-LxFRjB/ReviewBoard-2.5b2/reviewboard/reviews/fields.py,
line 9, in module
from djblets.markdown import iter_markdown_lines
django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing module
djblets.extensions.staticfiles: No module named markdown
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/easy_install, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('setuptools==3.3', 'console_scripts',
'easy_install')()
On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 1:30:08 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hey everyone,
We've put out the second beta of Review Board 2.5. We're hoping to
wrap this release cycle up soon, get an RC out the door in the next two
weeks and then ship the final 2.5 release shortly after. We'd love your
testing to help make this happen.
You can read our announcement, complete with screenshots, here:
https://www.reviewboard.org/news/2015/07/20/review-board-2-5-beta-2-out/
We also have an announcements mailing list available, for those not on
it: https://www.reviewboard.org/mailing-lists/
And as a reminder, we're posting the latest development news, feature
additions, design ideas, etc. over at the Review Board ChangeLog:
http://changelog.assembly.com/reviewboard
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/reviewboard/Mv4Y183SAVM/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
*Greg Jacobs* | Test Engineering Manager | Clearpath Robotics, Inc.
1425 Strasburg Rd., Suite 2A, Kitchener, Ontario N2R 1H2 Canada
*T: * 519-513-2416 x861 | *E:* gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com | *W:*
www.clearpathrobotics.com
*Your Unmanned Experts **TM *
--
*Greg Jacobs* | Test Engineering Manager | Clearpath Robotics, Inc.
1425 Strasburg Rd., Suite 2A, Kitchener, Ontario N2R 1H2 Canada
*T: * 519-513-2416 x861 | *E:* gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com | *W:*
www.clearpathrobotics.com
*Your Unmanned Experts **TM *
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Review Board 2.5 beta 2 is out!
Hi,
Looks like for whatever reason, your install pulled down an old version of
Djblets. It should have grabbed 0.9 beta 2, not beta 1.
The whole install process in your log looks questionable, though. It pulled
down the .tar.gz and not the .egg, which I'm surprised about. So, that's
also a problem. Review Board cannot be installed from a .tar.gz without a
bunch of extra packaging tools for the CSS/JavaScript also being installed.
What does `easy_install --version` say?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 6:27 AM, gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com wrote:
Pasted full logs here if that helps... Let me know how I can be of
assistance.
http://pastebin.com/kRqq6vfG
On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 8:56:37 AM UTC-4, Greg Jacobs wrote:
I should also note, I do have markdown installed and working correctly
etc. Beta1 ran fine prior.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:53 AM, gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com wrote:
Is there an upgrade path from beta1 to beta2?
Running into the following error trying an upgrade ( I'll debug further
if sane path - else if not supported assuming nuke the Django site and
leave db in place?)
The upgrade fails at:
File
/tmp/easy_install-LxFRjB/ReviewBoard-2.5b2/reviewboard/reviews/fields.py,
line 9, in module
from djblets.markdown import iter_markdown_lines
django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing module
djblets.extensions.staticfiles: No module named markdown
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/easy_install, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('setuptools==3.3', 'console_scripts',
'easy_install')()
On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 1:30:08 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hey everyone,
We've put out the second beta of Review Board 2.5. We're hoping to wrap
this release cycle up soon, get an RC out the door in the next two weeks
and then ship the final 2.5 release shortly after. We'd love your testing
to help make this happen.
You can read our announcement, complete with screenshots, here:
https://www.reviewboard.org/news/2015/07/20/review-board-2-5-beta-2-out/
We also have an announcements mailing list available, for those not on
it: https://www.reviewboard.org/mailing-lists/
And as a reminder, we're posting the latest development news, feature
additions, design ideas, etc. over at the Review Board ChangeLog:
http://changelog.assembly.com/reviewboard
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/reviewboard/Mv4Y183SAVM/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
*Greg Jacobs* | Test Engineering Manager | Clearpath Robotics, Inc.
1425 Strasburg Rd., Suite 2A, Kitchener, Ontario N2R 1H2 Canada
*T: * 519-513-2416 x861 | *E:* gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com | *W:*
www.clearpathrobotics.com
*Your Unmanned Experts **TM *
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Review Board 2.5 beta 2 is out!
Hi Paul, These fixes are not. Interdiffs were largely rewritten since 1.7 and behave differently. We've had further changes since 2.0 (though we may backport some of these fixes). Are there particular fixes you're interested in? Christain -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:30 AM, Paul Fee paul.f@gmail.com wrote: Hi Christian, I see this line in the 2.5 Beta 2 release notes: * Diff Viewer - Fixed some problems with interdiffs resulting from rebased changes Are these fixes applicable to the 1.7 release branch? Thanks, Paul On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 7:54:36 PM UTC+1, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:30 PM Christian Hammond chri...@beanbaginc.com wrote: Hey everyone, We've put out the second beta of Review Board 2.5. We're hoping to wrap this release cycle up soon, get an RC out the door in the next two weeks and then ship the final 2.5 release shortly after. We'd love your testing to help make this happen. You can read our announcement, complete with screenshots, here: https://www.reviewboard.org/news/2015/07/20/review-board-2-5-beta-2-out/ We also have an announcements mailing list available, for those not on it: https://www.reviewboard.org/mailing-lists/ And as a reminder, we're posting the latest development news, feature additions, design ideas, etc. over at the Review Board ChangeLog: http://changelog.assembly.com/reviewboard I've also created a new COPR repository for Fedora 21+ and RHEL/CentOS 7. You can now download and install Review Board 2.5 beta 2 for evaluation on those platforms. Browse to https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/sgallagh/reviewboard2.5/ and install the appropriate repository file into /etc/yum.repos.d, then do 'yum install ReviewBoard'. If you already have Review Board on the target system, back it up and then just do 'yum update ReviewBoard' (after having installed the repo file, of course). Yum may prompt you to accept the signing key for these new packages; that key should be: f836 fa56 6e04 caa8 832f 6efd fa1d d63c 353c 6a28 -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Review Board 2.5 beta 2 is out!
That did the trick ( ReviewBoard==2.5b2) ... so PEBKAC on my end. Thanks
all!
So I upgraded a test 2.5 beta1 system to beta2 by doing the following for
reference by others - you can give this blessing or scream that its a bad
idea:
sudo service apache2 stop
sudo easy_install \
-f http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/2.5/ \
-U ReviewBoard==2.5b2
sudo rb-site upgrade /var/www/your-existing-install-location
As far as output if anyone is curious...
-- begin log output --
Creating tables ...
Upgrading Review Board from 2.5 beta 1 to 2.5 beta 2
*There are unapplied evolutions for accounts.There are unapplied evolutions
for reviews.Project signature has changed - an evolution is required*
Installing custom SQL ...
Installing indexes ...
Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)
Evolution successful.
--- end log output ---
Things seem to work fine, will continue to test on my end. Cheers.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Christian Hammond christ...@beanbaginc.com
wrote:
Ah, looks like the problem is due to the package name you used. You want
ReviewBoard (or ReviewBoard==2.5b2) and not ReviewBoard-2.5b2. The
latter isn't being found as a package name, and it's trying hard to fulfill
the request by finding a source tarball matching the name given as a last
resort.
If you hit further problems, it's also probably worth upgrading your
version to setuptools (18.0.1 is the latest), as a lot has changed
involving package versioning and location since 3.3.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Greg Jacobs
gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com wrote:
# easy_install --version
setuptools 3.3
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Christian Hammond
christ...@beanbaginc.com wrote:
Hi,
Looks like for whatever reason, your install pulled down an old version
of Djblets. It should have grabbed 0.9 beta 2, not beta 1.
The whole install process in your log looks questionable, though. It
pulled down the .tar.gz and not the .egg, which I'm surprised about. So,
that's also a problem. Review Board cannot be installed from a .tar.gz
without a bunch of extra packaging tools for the CSS/JavaScript also being
installed.
What does `easy_install --version` say?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 6:27 AM, gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com wrote:
Pasted full logs here if that helps... Let me know how I can be of
assistance.
http://pastebin.com/kRqq6vfG
On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 8:56:37 AM UTC-4, Greg Jacobs wrote:
I should also note, I do have markdown installed and working correctly
etc. Beta1 ran fine prior.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:53 AM, gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com
wrote:
Is there an upgrade path from beta1 to beta2?
Running into the following error trying an upgrade ( I'll debug
further if sane path - else if not supported assuming nuke the Django
site
and leave db in place?)
The upgrade fails at:
File
/tmp/easy_install-LxFRjB/ReviewBoard-2.5b2/reviewboard/reviews/fields.py,
line 9, in module
from djblets.markdown import iter_markdown_lines
django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing module
djblets.extensions.staticfiles: No module named markdown
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/easy_install, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('setuptools==3.3', 'console_scripts',
'easy_install')()
On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 1:30:08 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hey everyone,
We've put out the second beta of Review Board 2.5. We're hoping to
wrap this release cycle up soon, get an RC out the door in the next two
weeks and then ship the final 2.5 release shortly after. We'd love your
testing to help make this happen.
You can read our announcement, complete with screenshots, here:
https://www.reviewboard.org/news/2015/07/20/review-board-2-5-beta-2-out/
We also have an announcements mailing list available, for those not
on it: https://www.reviewboard.org/mailing-lists/
And as a reminder, we're posting the latest development news,
feature additions, design ideas, etc. over at the Review Board
ChangeLog:
http://changelog.assembly.com/reviewboard
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in
the Google Groups reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe
Re: Review Board 2.5 beta 2 is out!
Ah, looks like the problem is due to the package name you used. You want
ReviewBoard (or ReviewBoard==2.5b2) and not ReviewBoard-2.5b2. The
latter isn't being found as a package name, and it's trying hard to fulfill
the request by finding a source tarball matching the name given as a last
resort.
If you hit further problems, it's also probably worth upgrading your
version to setuptools (18.0.1 is the latest), as a lot has changed
involving package versioning and location since 3.3.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Greg Jacobs gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com
wrote:
# easy_install --version
setuptools 3.3
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Christian Hammond
christ...@beanbaginc.com wrote:
Hi,
Looks like for whatever reason, your install pulled down an old version
of Djblets. It should have grabbed 0.9 beta 2, not beta 1.
The whole install process in your log looks questionable, though. It
pulled down the .tar.gz and not the .egg, which I'm surprised about. So,
that's also a problem. Review Board cannot be installed from a .tar.gz
without a bunch of extra packaging tools for the CSS/JavaScript also being
installed.
What does `easy_install --version` say?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 6:27 AM, gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com wrote:
Pasted full logs here if that helps... Let me know how I can be of
assistance.
http://pastebin.com/kRqq6vfG
On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 8:56:37 AM UTC-4, Greg Jacobs wrote:
I should also note, I do have markdown installed and working correctly
etc. Beta1 ran fine prior.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:53 AM, gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com wrote:
Is there an upgrade path from beta1 to beta2?
Running into the following error trying an upgrade ( I'll debug
further if sane path - else if not supported assuming nuke the Django site
and leave db in place?)
The upgrade fails at:
File
/tmp/easy_install-LxFRjB/ReviewBoard-2.5b2/reviewboard/reviews/fields.py,
line 9, in module
from djblets.markdown import iter_markdown_lines
django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing module
djblets.extensions.staticfiles: No module named markdown
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/easy_install, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('setuptools==3.3', 'console_scripts',
'easy_install')()
On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 1:30:08 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hey everyone,
We've put out the second beta of Review Board 2.5. We're hoping to
wrap this release cycle up soon, get an RC out the door in the next two
weeks and then ship the final 2.5 release shortly after. We'd love your
testing to help make this happen.
You can read our announcement, complete with screenshots, here:
https://www.reviewboard.org/news/2015/07/20/review-board-2-5-beta-2-out/
We also have an announcements mailing list available, for those not
on it: https://www.reviewboard.org/mailing-lists/
And as a reminder, we're posting the latest development news, feature
additions, design ideas, etc. over at the Review Board ChangeLog:
http://changelog.assembly.com/reviewboard
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/reviewboard/Mv4Y183SAVM/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
*Greg Jacobs* | Test Engineering Manager | Clearpath Robotics, Inc.
1425 Strasburg Rd., Suite 2A, Kitchener, Ontario N2R 1H2 Canada
*T: * 519-513-2416 x861 | *E:* gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com | *W:*
www.clearpathrobotics.com
*Your Unmanned Experts **TM *
--
*Greg Jacobs* | Test Engineering Manager | Clearpath Robotics, Inc.
1425 Strasburg Rd., Suite 2A, Kitchener, Ontario N2R 1H2 Canada
*T: * 519-513-2416 x861 | *E:* gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com | *W:*
www.clearpathrobotics.com
*Your Unmanned Experts **TM *
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you
Re: Review Board 2.5 beta 2 is out!
Glad to hear it!
That looks correct. You don't actually need to stop Apache, but it certainly
doesn't hurt as far as the upgrade process goes.
Let us know if you hit any bugs! Hoping to get RC out in a couple weeks.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
-Original Message-
From: Greg Jacobs gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com
Reply: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com
Date: July 22, 2015 at 2:32:12 PM
To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com
Cc: reviewboard-...@googlegroups.com reviewboard-...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Review Board 2.5 beta 2 is out!
That did the trick ( ReviewBoard==2.5b2) ... so PEBKAC on my end. Thanks
all!
So I upgraded a test 2.5 beta1 system to beta2 by doing the following for
reference by others - you can give this blessing or scream that its a bad
idea:
sudo service apache2 stop
sudo easy_install \
-f http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/2.5/ \
-U ReviewBoard==2.5b2
sudo rb-site upgrade /var/www/your-existing-install-location
As far as output if anyone is curious...
-- --
Creating tables ...
Upgrading Review Board from 2.5 beta 1 to 2.5 beta 2
*There are unapplied evolutions for accounts.There are unapplied evolutions
for reviews.Project signature has changed - an evolution is required*
Installing custom SQL ...
Installing indexes ...
Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)
Evolution successful.
--- ---
Things seem to work fine, will continue to test on my end. Cheers.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Ah, looks like the problem is due to the package name you used. You want
ReviewBoard (or ReviewBoard==2.5b2) and not ReviewBoard-2.5b2. The
latter isn't being found as a package name, and it's trying hard to fulfill
the request by finding a source tarball matching the name given as a last
resort.
If you hit further problems, it's also probably worth upgrading your
version to setuptools (18.0.1 is the latest), as a lot has changed
involving package versioning and location since 3.3.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Greg Jacobs
gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com wrote:
# easy_install --version
setuptools 3.3
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Christian Hammond
christ...@beanbaginc.com wrote:
Hi,
Looks like for whatever reason, your install pulled down an old version
of Djblets. It should have grabbed 0.9 beta 2, not beta 1.
The whole install process in your log looks questionable, though. It
pulled down the .tar.gz and not the .egg, which I'm surprised about. So,
that's also a problem. Review Board cannot be installed from a .tar.gz
without a bunch of extra packaging tools for the CSS/JavaScript also being
installed.
What does `easy_install --version` say?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 6:27 AM, wrote:
Pasted full logs here if that helps... Let me know how I can be of
assistance.
http://pastebin.com/kRqq6vfG
On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 8:56:37 AM UTC-4, Greg Jacobs wrote:
I should also note, I do have markdown installed and working correctly
etc. Beta1 ran fine prior.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:53 AM,
wrote:
Is there an upgrade path from beta1 to beta2?
Running into the following error trying an upgrade ( I'll debug
further if sane path - else if not supported assuming nuke the Django
site
and leave db in place?)
The upgrade fails at:
File
/tmp/easy_install-LxFRjB/ReviewBoard-2.5b2/reviewboard/reviews/fields.py,
line 9, in
from djblets.markdown import iter_markdown_lines
django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing module
djblets.extensions.staticfiles: No module named markdown
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/easy_install, line 9, in
load_entry_point('setuptools==3.3', 'console_scripts',
'easy_install')()
On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 1:30:08 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hey everyone,
We've put out the second beta of Review Board 2.5. We're hoping to
wrap this release cycle up soon, get an RC out the door in the next
two
weeks and then ship the final 2.5 release shortly after. We'd love
your
testing to help make this happen.
You can read our announcement, complete with screenshots, here:
https://www.reviewboard.org/news/2015/07/20/review-board-2-5-beta-2-out/
We also have an announcements mailing list available, for those
Re: Review Board 2.5 beta 2 is out!
Hi Christian, I see this line in the 2.5 Beta 2 release notes: * Diff Viewer - Fixed some problems with interdiffs resulting from rebased changes Are these fixes applicable to the 1.7 release branch? Thanks, Paul On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 7:54:36 PM UTC+1, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:30 PM Christian Hammond chri...@beanbaginc.com javascript: wrote: Hey everyone, We've put out the second beta of Review Board 2.5. We're hoping to wrap this release cycle up soon, get an RC out the door in the next two weeks and then ship the final 2.5 release shortly after. We'd love your testing to help make this happen. You can read our announcement, complete with screenshots, here: https://www.reviewboard.org/news/2015/07/20/review-board-2-5-beta-2-out/ We also have an announcements mailing list available, for those not on it: https://www.reviewboard.org/mailing-lists/ And as a reminder, we're posting the latest development news, feature additions, design ideas, etc. over at the Review Board ChangeLog: http://changelog.assembly.com/reviewboard I've also created a new COPR repository for Fedora 21+ and RHEL/CentOS 7. You can now download and install Review Board 2.5 beta 2 for evaluation on those platforms. Browse to https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/sgallagh/reviewboard2.5/ and install the appropriate repository file into /etc/yum.repos.d, then do 'yum install ReviewBoard'. If you already have Review Board on the target system, back it up and then just do 'yum update ReviewBoard' (after having installed the repo file, of course). Yum may prompt you to accept the signing key for these new packages; that key should be: f836 fa56 6e04 caa8 832f 6efd fa1d d63c 353c 6a28 -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Review Board 2.5 beta 2 is out!
Is there an upgrade path from beta1 to beta2?
Running into the following error trying an upgrade ( I'll debug further if
sane path - else if not supported assuming nuke the Django site and leave
db in place?)
The upgrade fails at:
File
/tmp/easy_install-LxFRjB/ReviewBoard-2.5b2/reviewboard/reviews/fields.py,
line 9, in module
from djblets.markdown import iter_markdown_lines
django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing module
djblets.extensions.staticfiles: No module named markdown
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/easy_install, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('setuptools==3.3', 'console_scripts',
'easy_install')()
On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 1:30:08 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hey everyone,
We've put out the second beta of Review Board 2.5. We're hoping to wrap
this release cycle up soon, get an RC out the door in the next two weeks
and then ship the final 2.5 release shortly after. We'd love your testing
to help make this happen.
You can read our announcement, complete with screenshots, here:
https://www.reviewboard.org/news/2015/07/20/review-board-2-5-beta-2-out/
We also have an announcements mailing list available, for those not on it:
https://www.reviewboard.org/mailing-lists/
And as a reminder, we're posting the latest development news, feature
additions, design ideas, etc. over at the Review Board ChangeLog:
http://changelog.assembly.com/reviewboard
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com javascript:
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Review Board 2.5 beta 2 is out!
I should also note, I do have markdown installed and working correctly etc.
Beta1 ran fine prior.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:53 AM, gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com wrote:
Is there an upgrade path from beta1 to beta2?
Running into the following error trying an upgrade ( I'll debug further if
sane path - else if not supported assuming nuke the Django site and leave
db in place?)
The upgrade fails at:
File
/tmp/easy_install-LxFRjB/ReviewBoard-2.5b2/reviewboard/reviews/fields.py,
line 9, in module
from djblets.markdown import iter_markdown_lines
django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing module
djblets.extensions.staticfiles: No module named markdown
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/easy_install, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('setuptools==3.3', 'console_scripts',
'easy_install')()
On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 1:30:08 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hey everyone,
We've put out the second beta of Review Board 2.5. We're hoping to wrap
this release cycle up soon, get an RC out the door in the next two weeks
and then ship the final 2.5 release shortly after. We'd love your testing
to help make this happen.
You can read our announcement, complete with screenshots, here:
https://www.reviewboard.org/news/2015/07/20/review-board-2-5-beta-2-out/
We also have an announcements mailing list available, for those not on
it: https://www.reviewboard.org/mailing-lists/
And as a reminder, we're posting the latest development news, feature
additions, design ideas, etc. over at the Review Board ChangeLog:
http://changelog.assembly.com/reviewboard
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/reviewboard/Mv4Y183SAVM/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
*Greg Jacobs* | Test Engineering Manager | Clearpath Robotics, Inc.
1425 Strasburg Rd., Suite 2A, Kitchener, Ontario N2R 1H2 Canada
*T: * 519-513-2416 x861 | *E:* gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com | *W:*
www.clearpathrobotics.com
*Your Unmanned Experts **TM *
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Review Board 2.5 beta 2 is out!
Hey everyone, We've put out the second beta of Review Board 2.5. We're hoping to wrap this release cycle up soon, get an RC out the door in the next two weeks and then ship the final 2.5 release shortly after. We'd love your testing to help make this happen. You can read our announcement, complete with screenshots, here: https://www.reviewboard.org/news/2015/07/20/review-board-2-5-beta-2-out/ We also have an announcements mailing list available, for those not on it: https://www.reviewboard.org/mailing-lists/ And as a reminder, we're posting the latest development news, feature additions, design ideas, etc. over at the Review Board ChangeLog: http://changelog.assembly.com/reviewboard Christian -- Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Review Board 2.5 beta 2 is out!
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:30 PM Christian Hammond christ...@beanbaginc.com wrote: Hey everyone, We've put out the second beta of Review Board 2.5. We're hoping to wrap this release cycle up soon, get an RC out the door in the next two weeks and then ship the final 2.5 release shortly after. We'd love your testing to help make this happen. You can read our announcement, complete with screenshots, here: https://www.reviewboard.org/news/2015/07/20/review-board-2-5-beta-2-out/ We also have an announcements mailing list available, for those not on it: https://www.reviewboard.org/mailing-lists/ And as a reminder, we're posting the latest development news, feature additions, design ideas, etc. over at the Review Board ChangeLog: http://changelog.assembly.com/reviewboard I've also created a new COPR repository for Fedora 21+ and RHEL/CentOS 7. You can now download and install Review Board 2.5 beta 2 for evaluation on those platforms. Browse to https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/sgallagh/reviewboard2.5/ and install the appropriate repository file into /etc/yum.repos.d, then do 'yum install ReviewBoard'. If you already have Review Board on the target system, back it up and then just do 'yum update ReviewBoard' (after having installed the repo file, of course). Yum may prompt you to accept the signing key for these new packages; that key should be: f836 fa56 6e04 caa8 832f 6efd fa1d d63c 353c 6a28 -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
