Hi,
Currently, whenever we had to add an user from ldap to a group, the
user has to first login to the system, so that the user is added to
the reviewboard database.
We want a way to avoid having the user to login in order to use that
id from the admin ui.
So is there any way to import users from
ase tables. Has
> been working quite well. Of course, you have to pay attention to users from
> LDAP that already exist, and perhaps users who have been disabled in LDAP.
>
> No automated way to do it, other than that, at least that I'm aware.
>
> Eric
>
> On May
viewBoard.
>
> >> Args:
> >> ldap_user_info: dictionary of LDAP user info to add
> >> """
> >> # Get current time in correct format.
> >> now = time.strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S')
>
> >> # Create a MySQL connection obje
Hello,
In reviewboard the submitter can upload a file for review. Is it also
possible to allow the reviewers (by some configuration) to upload a file
into the reviewboard?
Thanks,
Joe
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host
Hi,
We upgraded to 1.6.12 from 1.6.3 yesterday. We're using an internal github
as our master repository, and have about 20 repositories defined in
reviewboard. The hosting service is set to None, the type to git, the paths
look
like g...@github.corp.ad.local:cm/transform.git. For the upgrade we
file(path, revision, "-t")
File
"/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.12-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/git.py",
line 440, in _cat_file
raise SCMError(errmsg)
SCMError: fatal: Not a git repository: 'None'
On Friday, October 5, 2012 1:15:14 PM U
me being -- no need to get this working
for us.
And thanks, for ReviewBoard -- it's great.
Joe
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~--
line without it
checking for any repository in the current location. Is that possible?
Best regards,
Joe.
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at
Hello,
We periodically get this lock error. Im running review board 1.7.22.
Best regards,
Joe.
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.4.10-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py",
line 111, in get_response
response
Hi Matthew,
Yes, it would be good if rbt has an option to specify the repository so
that one can directly post.
The reason here is, in our development tree we have a packaging
architecture and the diff generated by another tool. So we don't have the
repo details with us.
Best regards,
Hello,
I believe I'm still running my review board in sqlite3 (how to confirm it)
Are there any scripts from review board to convert this database to MySQL
or PostgreSQL.
Also which one (MySQL or PostgreSQL) is better option.
Best regards,
Joe.
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at
"2015-03-20T00:36:22.807Z",
"session_data":
"gAJ9cQFVCnRlc3Rjb29raWVxAlUGd29ya2VkcQNzLjViMGE0ODQwNDRhMjdjY2UyNDhjODgxYWIx\nZjlkZDky\n"}}
'Error: (1146, "Table 'reviewboard_mysqldb.django_session' doesn't exist")
Line 2025: '{"pk": "4eefe47bedaa52c81faaf65f
Hello,
Anyone who can say what could be the issue that I have mentioned below.
Best regards,
Joe.
On Monday, April 14, 2014 3:45:48 PM UTC+2, Joe wrote:
>
> David:
>
> When I tried this, I get the following errors:
>
> 1. rb-site manage /path/to/site dumpdb > data
itial-data
Best regards,
Joe.
On Tuesday, April 15, 2014 9:34:26 PM UTC+2, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> loaddb and loaddata both require that you have an existing database schema
> in place.
>
> You'll need to first use the version of Review Board you were using for
&
7;: 'localhost',
'PORT': ''
},
}
4. # rb-site manage /var/www/reviewboard syncdb --
5. # rb-site manage /var/www/reviewboard loaddb
/path/to/dumpfile/database.json
Done.
Best regards,
Joe.
On Thursday, April 24, 2014 10:20:25 AM UTC+2, Joe wrote:
>
mand: 'rebuild_index'
Type 'rbsite.pyc help' for usage.
Any pointers on how to build the search index.
Best regards,
Joe.
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.
Ah!
it works with
# rb-site manage /var/www/reviewboard index
This rebuilds index.
# rb-site manage help
Doesnt show anything. Where to get the supported list of commands and their
behaviour details?
Best regards,
Joe.
On Thursday, April 24, 2014 11:22:43 AM UTC+2, Joe wrote:
>
>
Hello,
I have around 30 users who want to have an account created. Currently I see
that I can do that via UI.
Wanted to know if there is any bulk user creation option from CSV file or
something on those lines.
Best regards,
Joe.
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http
Hello,
In our review board we have 200+ users. As a admin, I want to send an email
to all these users. Is there any way to do it from within reviewboard.
We use RB 1.7.22
Best regards,
Joe.
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review
gs)
File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/MySQLdb/cursors.py", line 166,
in execute
self.errorhandler(self, exc, value)
File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/MySQLdb/connections.py", line
35, in defaulterrorhandler
raise errorclass, errorvalue
django.db.uti
Hello David, Christian,
Following are the version which have been installed:
Django 1.4.13
Djblets 0.7.30
Best regards,
Joe.
On Thursday, July 10, 2014 8:58:55 PM UTC+2, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Also, what version of Djblets?
>
> This smells like a dependency v
Hi David,
That has been the issue. When I tried to print the django version with the
python command, it said
(1,6,5)
Now I removed that and have again reinstalled 1.4.13 and Im able to
successfully install the rb-site.
Thanks for your help!
Best Regards,
Joe.
On Saturday, July 12, 2014
s not found in the repository (HTTP 400, API Error 207)
However, an empty draft with no diff is generated in the review board site.
Is there a way to avoid this? Or permanently delete this draft (we don’t
want to discard it, but permanently delete it)
Best Regards,
Joe.
Hello,
I see from the documentation that it is still only possible to add extended
review request fields only as text-inputs. Does that still hold true?
Is there any long term plan to support checkboxes and pull down menus.
Those would be very helpful.
Best Regards,
Joe.
On Thursday, August
I am having the exact issue that Rajat was. I'm guessing that it is simply a
matter of me not understanding exactly how reviewboard works.
Here's what post-review --debug gives me:
post-review --debug
>>> RBTools 0.3.2
>>> Home = /path/to/home/dir
>>> svn info
>>> git rev-parse --git-dir
>>> git
I think I figured this out.
Essentially, we were using git without a centralized repository. I believe
that reviewboard doesn't like this.
So, I set up a directory on our server to act as a central repository and
then cloned our repositories into there using the --bare option:
cd /path/to/new/
I was running into a weird error with post-review.
Here's the post-review --debug
>>> RBTools 0.3.2
>>> Home = /path/to/home/dir
>>> svn info
>>> git rev-parse --git-dir
>>> git symbolic-ref -q HEAD
>>> git config --get branch.master.merge
>>> git config --get branch.master.remote
>>> git config
I just upgraded from 1.6RC1 to 1.6RC2 and when I ran rb-site upgrade, I got
the following output:
Rebuilding directory structure
Updating database. This may take a while.
Creating tables ...
Upgrading Review Board from 1.6 RC1 to 1.6 RC2
There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer.
Installing c
Specifically "There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer." It
appeared in a red color which made me think it might be a problem.
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> Nothing in there looks problematic to me. What concerned you? Jus
Running rb-site upgrade /var/www/cim-review after an easy_install -U
ReviewBoard resulted in this:
Rebuilding directory structure
Updating database. This may take a while.
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3-py2.6.egg/django/db/
__init__.py:60: DeprecationWarning: Short names for ENGINE in
There is currently no way to set a bind DN for a bind user to access
the LDAP. My ldap does not support anonymous binding. Am I missing
this config or is truly not there?
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at htt
Was upgrading from base 1.5 release to 1.6 with a postgres DB. I did
eventually get the evolutions to work by renaming existing columns and
dropping at least one empty table. This allowed the evolutions to complete
and I was able to get the site back up and running.
Joe
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at
1.5.0.
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Which 1.5?
>
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 1:02
,
Joe
On Sep 8, 5:42 pm, Joe Campbell wrote:
> There is currently no way to set a bind DN for a bind user to access
> the LDAP. My ldap does not support anonymous binding. Am I missing
> this config or is truly not there?
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today
x27;Just worked' without needing any special intervention from me.
Joe
On Sep 11, 4:14 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Which 1.5?
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.
ror e-mail that ReviewBoard sent.
Thanks,
Joe
[Review Board] ERROR (EXTERNAL IP): Internal Server Error: /r/52/
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/home/jmou/src/reviewboard/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/handlers/base.py",
line 111, in get_response
response = callbac
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> For the git configuration, are you using a clone that Review Board can
> access, or the raw URL configuration?
>
I'm not sure I understand entirely, but the git repository is on the local
filesystem of
using different users
3. Rebooting the server hosting reviewboard web app
None of these have worked. Does anyone have a suggestion as this is a bit
of a show-stopper in terms of us being able to use this tool for reviews.
Thanks in advance,
Joe
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
e found
in the repository
Show less
On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 12:10:56 PM UTC-4, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
> Are there any errors in the Review Board log file?
>
> -David
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 9:09 AM Joe Cooper > wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> My team is
ot committing a
modification and rename at the same time?
On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 2:48:08 PM UTC-4, Joe Cooper wrote:
>
> David,
>
> Thank you for your prompt feedback.
>
> I've added the error details from the log below. I the commit I had a
> problem with a file was renamed to
being parsed
> correctly. If you're willing to jump into the code to make it save the diff
> so we can have a sample, we can get the bug fixed.
>
> -David
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:04 AM Joe Cooper > wrote:
>
>> I've narrowed this problem down to if the
I updated my site to 1.7.0.1-py2.7 and I'm still getting 404 errors for
anything under /static
I added the alias for /static and restarted Apache 2, but it seems to have
no effect. Am I missing something obvious?
My Apache 2 configuration:
ServerName uxworks-reviewboard.mysite.com
Adding a section fixed the problem!
Thanks, Christian!
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 1:02:53 AM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Joe,
>
> Sorry for the late response. Looks like gmail flagged this as spam. Odd.
>
> You may need to add a that works just like the media
Hi Eric, can you post your modified custom authenticator?
On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 1:02:10 PM UTC-7, Eric Johnson wrote:
>
> I achieved your aim for our local copy of ReviewBoard by snagging the
> existing LDAP code, and modifying it slightly. I then used the modified
> code as a custom auth
44 matches
Mail list logo
