lib\site-packages\django-1.1-py2.5.egg\django
\shortcuts\__init__.py", line 87, in get_object_or_404
raise Http404('No %s matches the given query.' %
queryset.model._meta.object_name)
Http404: No FileDiff matches the given query.
The diff was uploaded via the post-review tool.
P
and used the admin to
view the "review request draft to change" I got a 500 error.
Once published I can admin the non-draft review just fine.
Pv
On Sep 23, 5:05 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yep, this is the right mailing list.
>
> So first of all, did y
n and that simplejson
is for legacy support on 2.5 & 2.4.
So why does easy_install rbtools want to install simplejson?
Thanks!
Pv
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let u
ss.csproj.FileListAbsolute.txt\n',
'
===\n', "svn: Can't start process 'diff': The system cannot find
the file specified. \n"]
I understand the origin of the error, but the code of post-review
looks li
Duh! This is a "diff" problem that I ran in to before...fixing now.
Pv
On Oct 29, 10:43 am, Pv wrote:
> I am doing a post-commit review on a teammate's checked in C# code on
> an SVN server.
> I run:
> post-review -d --revision-range=24506
>
> And I get
Yes, it was a simple diff not being in my path problem.
Pv
On Oct 29, 10:49 am, Pv wrote:
> Duh! This is a "diff" problem that I ran in to before...fixing now.
>
> Pv
>
> On Oct 29, 10:43 am, Pv wrote:
>
>
>
> > I am doing a post-commit review on a tea
Opened 1378
Pv
On Oct 29, 11:34 am, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Glad you figured it out. We need to check for that and fail gracefully.
> Would you mind filing a bug so we can track it for the release?
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
I am using the following command to do a post-commit review on a first
time checkin:
post-review -d --revision-range=24506
Obviously, I am not specifying a from:to range, but since this is a
first time checking any earlier "from" svn rev # wouldn't exist in the
newly created path.
The [debug] ou
--revision-range=1234) and the diff is
empty, then try something like an "svn cat", but with a diff
compatible output.
Pv
On Nov 2, 12:41 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> It sounds like the generated diff is empty. If you add --output-diff to
> those parameters, you should be ab
hip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Pv wrote:
>
> > I had ActivePython 2.6 installed and installed ezsetup for py26 (on a
> > x64 Windows 2K8 Server).
> >
w", but I think that just operates to create a new diff,
not get a list of the existing diffs.
Is there an API method to get the total file set of a reviewrequest?
Thanks!
Pv
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www
GET r/diff/raw sounds like a reasonable way to DL the diff, so I
wouldn't expect the API to duplicate this simple request.
Pv
On Nov 4, 4:19 am, H M wrote:
> Is there a way to download a diff through the formal JSON api?
>
> I realize the diff could be downloaded through
the one installed following this step:
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/codebase/dev/getting-started/#rbtools
Any idea what my my malfunction is?
Pv
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Le
I ran in to the same thing and opened a bug to make a missing diff
binary a friendlier message.
Pv
On Nov 6, 10:24 pm, Akhilesh wrote:
> After a lot of troubleshooting I found the problem: diff.exe was not
> present in the PATH.
>
> On Nov 6, 2:57 pm, Akhilesh wrote:
>
>
s one, since this does not obligate me to also
implement:
reviewrequests/(?P[0-9]+)/diff/(?
P[0-9]+)/filenames/
Pv
On Nov 5, 2:49 am, Christian Hammond wrote:
> I forgot that we actually had a patch up for review for this. It's now
> committed to master and will be in the
I have no idea why that word wrapped so bad! :(
Pv
On Nov 7, 12:05 pm, Pv wrote:
> Yes, I noticed the patch Friday, sweet!
> One nitpick is that because I am writing a pre-commit hook to inerface
> w/ RB, all I currently want is a simple list of the latest filenames
> in the
ewboard"
directory is a git enlistment.
svn was in my path, but git was not.
I added git to my path and it finally asked me for my
reviews.reviewboard.org username/password.
Pv
On Nov 8, 11:59 am, Dan Savilonis wrote:
> You can run post-review with the -d option to see what it i
I've fought this one all day while setting up a new RB server.
Server: W2K3, Apache2.2, Python25, plus all of the other required
trimmings.
I have installed 2 other RB servers [on XP] and hadn't seen this
problem before.
I install the server and can log in and create users and change other
variou
Running dev version does same thing; it immediately quits.
The output is:
Running dependency checks (set DEBUG=False to turn this off)...
Warning: p4python (>=07.3) not found. Perforce integration will not
work.
Warning: hg not found. Mercurial integration will not work.
Warning: PyLucene (with
Running it in winpdb shows:
Stack trace for thread 1388:
Frame File Name Line
Function
--
> 0 ...jango\utils\autoreload.py96 python_reloader
1 ...jango\utils\autoreload.py 118
Well, I cleaned my W2K3 Server's Python25 directory and reinstalled
all required modules and things started to work fine.
I inherited the machine, and I guess it was in a dirty state. :(
All is good now!
Pv
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Want to help the Review
It was for an "svn://server/root" CollabNet SVN server.
Cleaning up my Python modules fixed the problem (albeit it took
awhile...albeit it was obviously necessary).
Pv
On Nov 10, 7:20 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> What sort of SVN repo is this? Plain, https?
>
> Chris
2) ReviewBoard could reuse or add a setting that would be passed as a
"domain" attribute in a "Set-Cookie2" header
Without patching post-review or ReviewBoard, can anyone think of a way
to get Apache to send the "domain" attribute in the cookie?
Pv
-
Where is this Eclipse and/or IDEA plugin?
I searched the reviewboard and rbtools git repo and didn't see
anything.
I do see the review though:
http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/967/
But browsing git I can't find that path.
Is there a VS plugin took? [or in the works?]
Pv
On Nov 1
I have installed a fresh copy of Win7 x64 and VS2K8.
I then installed Py2.6 + RBTools 0.2rc1.
I create a new C# project, svn add, and then post-review the project.
I get a "UnicodeDecodeError" on the Solution's/Project's xml/config
files.
There is a signature of "\xef\xbb\xbf" at the beginning of t
NOTE: If I manually browse to my reviewboard server and upload the
diff it accepts it no problem.
I am not doing anything to intentionally encode these files beyond the
default VS2K8 encoding.
Pv
On Feb 23, 4:20 pm, Pv wrote:
> I have installed a fresh copy of Win7 x64 and VS2K8.
>
1.1 alpha 2 (dev)
I am pretty sure this aborts in RBTools itself before it ever gets to
the server.
Again, a manual upload of the diff file to the server works fine.
Pv
On Feb 23, 5:27 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hi Pv,
>
> Which version of Review Board is this?
>
Studio 2008.
After running in to the problem w/ default encoding I have tried
saving the culprit files w/ various other encodings, but nothing seems
to make post-review happy.
Pv
On Feb 24, 4:55 pm, Pv wrote:
> 1.1 alpha 2 (dev)
>
> I am pretty sure this aborts in RBTools itself before
Yes, I just commented that out and the upload was successful.
Pv
On Feb 25, 12:25 pm, "Thilo-Alexander Ginkel"
wrote:
> On Thursday 25 February 2010 01:55:42 Pv wrote:
>
> > I am pretty sure this aborts in RBTools itself before it ever gets to
> > the server.
>
It should have been:
return content_type, content.encode('utf-8', 'ignore')
Pv
On Feb 25, 12:43 pm, Pv wrote:
> Yes, I just commented that out and the upload was successful.
>
> Pv
>
> On Feb 25, 12:25 pm, "Thilo-Alexander Ginkel"
> wro
code bytes in position 5-6:
unexpected end of data
>>> u = unicode(s, 'utf8', 'ignore')
>>> u
u'La Pe'
>>> u = unicode(s, 'utf8', 'replace')
>>> u
u'La Pe\ufffd'
>>>
I don't kn
> u = unicode(s, 'utf8')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
File "C:\Python25\lib\encodings\utf_8.py", line 16, in decode
return codecs.utf_8_decode(input, errors, True)
UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf8' codec can't decode
nice if reviewboard diffs wouldn't put a red
rectangle around the initial BOM chars.
The existence of BOM chars is normal and should be gracefully/silently
ignored.
A red box indicates to me an error/warning of some sort.
If the BOM differs between the two files then that should be
gracefu
33 matches
Mail list logo
