ity. So I thought, perhaps we could look
>>> for solutions where Sage is used together with web assembly.
>>>
>>> After some research I have the impression that there are some proofs of
>>> concept, but there is nothing actively developed?
>>>
>>&g
With switching to Miniforge it is now working for me extremely well. I’m
going to be making a new video and tutorial about this soon. Thanks for
all you do Isuru!
-- William Stein
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 9:11 AM Isuru Fernando wrote:
> Hi William,
>
> Let me know if you have any
Hi Vincent,
To help whoever takes over, do you have any comments about *why* you
will not work on any of these projects? Is it just lack of time and you
need
to focus on something else, or is there something fundamentally annoying
about the direction of these projects? Thanks for any insight to
10, 2024 at 5:31 PM William Stein wrote:
> I was just carefully reading the page about Mambaforge linked to from
> Sage, i.e., this page
>
> https://github.com/conda-forge/miniforge
>
> and it says that Mambaforge is deprecated and no longer recommended, and
> instead people shou
-$(uname)-$(uname
-m).sh
sh Miniforge3-$(uname)-$(uname -m).sh -b -u -p /conda
-- William
On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 4:05 PM William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So I was using MicroMamba, whereas that page says Sage only
> supports Mambaforge, Miniforge, Miniconda or Anaconda.I tried w
easy to switch Python versions. So I'll switch from using
MicroMamba to Mambaforge. Problem solved.
William
On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 1:47 PM William Stein wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 1:39 PM Matthias Koeppe
> wrote:
>
>> William, do the instructions in our In
stances of the value.
set Set a configuration value
get Get a configuration value
>
>
>
> On Sunday, March 10, 2024 at 12:36:47 PM UTC-7 William Stein wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just tried installing sage via conda and
Hi,
I just tried installing sage via conda and it's broken. Am I doing
something wrong, or is there any automated testing of sage in conda (which
might be a good thing to have)? I was going to publicize sage+conda in a
post I was about to make, but won't...
1. Install mambaforge into Ubuntu
://github.com/sagemath/sage/wiki/NumFOCUS and I welcome discussion
>> here and collaborative editing in the wiki page.
>> I'll submit by the next target date (Apr 15).
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, March 5, 2024 at 11:28:38 AM UTC-8 kcrisman wrote:
>
Hi,
Related to NumFOCUS, this new proposal for Jupyter to restructure their
relationship with NumFocus is possibly relevant:
https://jupyter.org/governance/linux-proposal.html
William
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 12:59 PM Matthias Koeppe
wrote:
> In case people are interested in a synchronous
+1
On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 8:03 AM Edgar Costa wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2024, 10:49 Giacomo Pope wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Monday, March 4, 2024 at 1:57:48 PM UTC Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 8:43 AM David Roe wrote:
>>>
The following proposal has
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 8:39 AM Eric Gourgoulhon
wrote:
> -1 from my side, for I think an issue can be a blocker.
> For instance:
> https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/36914
> This issue, which regards the use of the notebook, could not have been
> detected by the CI framework. It is a
(Also, thanks everyone for so far taking extra effort to be civil when
discussing the topic of vendored
dependencies, which I know touches a nerve for people.)
On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 4:36 PM William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi Dima,
>
> I believe I'm the person who introduced that long sta
Hi Dima,
I believe I'm the person who introduced that long standing policy. It
was indeed motivated by a significant paying customer's requirement
to install Sage entirely from source, and without an external network.
I believe no such customers have supported the Sage project for about
a
experience for everyone participating in Sage
development.
Best regards,
Volker Braun and William Stein
[1] https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+label%3Adisputed
--
William (http://wstein.org)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sa
.
-- William
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 2:01 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 9:30 PM William Stein wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Last time I benchmarked things, luatex was sometimes the slowest of
> > the three major latex compilers, sometimes by a fac
Hi,
Last time I benchmarked things, luatex was sometimes the slowest of
the three major latex compilers, sometimes by a factor of 2.
I realize benchmarking could be impacted by things like how exactly
Lua was built on the target platform, as part of latex. In any case,
for
this application,
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 12:37 PM John H Palmieri
wrote:
> To the extent that this specific PR is emblematic of a particular approach
> to Sage development (a flawed approach in Dima's view, if I understand
> right), then the whole approach should be discussed here. Probably many of
> these
Again, as the person who added it to Sage in the first place: deprecate.
William
On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 4:02 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> deprecate!
>
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 10:47 PM John H Palmieri
> wrote:
> >
> > I asked this already but with a different subject heading, so people may
> To give an explicit and specific example, I'm also interested in graph
> algorithms, without calling libraries written in C/C++ or Julia, is it
> possible to make graph algorithms faster on very-large graphs with what's
> mentioned above?
>
One relevant Python library is
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 4:13 AM kcrisman wrote:
> GitHub search is terrible, and I don't understand why. I often (not on this
> project) search for words (not just text strings) that I know I present
> multiple times in the codebase, and get no results at all. Sort of defeats
> the point of
Hi,
I'm the guilty party who added \ to Sage notation in the first place,
and I would definitely vote to *remove* it. I wish I had
never added it in the first place. Nils has some very good points!
In retrospect, I wish we had a "fully supported" way of using Sage
entirely without the
Hi Sage Developers,
Jennifer Balakrishnan and I are members of a prize committee for a new
prize in "mathematical software", which the Europeans
have decided to fund.Here's the call for *self nominations*, and a link
to the webpage with more details. I personally think
any significant
On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 2:56 AM Nils Bruin wrote:
>
> On Friday, 30 June 2023 at 20:41:51 UTC+2 William Stein wrote:
>
> The point is that instead of using GPT's vague memory of what it might
> have seen, this instead uses the actual Sage source code, and mainly
> uses
ren
Co-Founder & CTO at Wolfia (YC S22)
(314) 562-8039 | LinkedIn | Twitter
--
Best Regards,
William Stein
CEO, SageMath, Inc.
https://cocalc.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and s
Hi,
Related Question: Is anybody interested in making it so
https://doc.sagemath.org/ hosts many different versions of the Sage
documentation instead of just the latest?
I only looked into this for a second, but readthedocs.io often has
many versions of docs for projects. Also, I always
I vote for (A)
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 7:40 PM Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We spent six days for the preliminary discussion in the sage-devel thread
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/OUnoroIf0qc
>
> about choosing the keyword triggering block-scoped optional tag needed in
>
>
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 1:02 PM Michael Orlitzky
wrote:
> The second issue is that WebAssembly doesn't actually solve the
> problems we have,
By "the problem we have" I guess maybe you mean "Sage is a lot of work to
maintain".The fundamental
and massive problem that I think SageMath has is
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 2:15 PM Michael Orlitzky
wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 13:56 -0700, William Stein wrote:
> >
> > (5) provide a WebAssembly option
> >
> > WebAssembly is typically about half the speed as native code (at best),
> but
> > it is high
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 1:44 PM Matthias Koeppe
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 12:49:29 PM UTC-7 Francesco Biscani wrote:
>
> On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 at 02:02, Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
> building binary wheels to be distributed on PyPI (in addition to the
source distributions) will be one
to be realistic about.
> Perhaps this is the question that I am looking for an answer for, "What is
> Sage (after modularization)?"
Sage would be part of the Python ecosystem.
>
> Best,
> Travis
>
>
> On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 8:23:01 AM UTC+9 Willia
ls from it, send an
> email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/80a6ba58-17e8-4a99-950a-3bfb5e0b24fen%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/80a6ba58-17e8-4a9
Hi Sage Devs,
As further motivation for this discussion of "Modularization project:
I. The goals", here is a quote from a discussion just now (with
permission) from Eric Deeds, who is the vice chair for Life Sciences
Math Courses and Professor of Integrative Biology and Physiology at
UCLA:
"I
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 10:15 AM David Roe wrote:
>
> The problem is that Sage doesn't have a specialized type for integers mod N:
> sage: type(M3)
>
More precisely, Sage doesn't have a specialized type for matrices over
integers mod N, for N *large*. For smaller N it does, e.g.,
sage:
On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 6:53 PM Matthias Koeppe
wrote:
> On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 6:20:03 PM UTC-7 Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>
> My understanding of William's goal (please correct me if I am wrong) was
> to put everything together so nobody was trying to build a better wheel. To
> me, by
-4c54-a3dc-a8d1dacc8b53n%40googlegroups.com.
>>
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sage-devel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@
9d557-fd7d-4c6a-8644-3ee96966b8fan%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/d459d557-fd7d-4c6a-8644-3ee96966b8fan%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
> .
>
--
-- William Stein
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to th
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 2:15 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> So far we only had very few votes cast.
You might want to consider structuring the voting process more. For
example, David Roe did a great job with this for the "move sage to
github"
vote, including a clear deadline, a thread where no
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 9:19 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Please admit it, otherwise. I don't see a way to continue a discussion with
> you.
Can you please continue to engage, but view this as a public debate
for the benefit of all sage developers, rather than a discussion with
Matthias? It's a
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 7:57 AM wrote:
> > a) Sage has a dual role as a library ("project") and as a distribution. NEP
> > 29 was designed for projects, and not for software distributions.
>
> No, Sage is just a project, with lots of dependencies (way too many).
> It's not a software distribution
Hi,
To help with people who want to make an informed decision, is there
any public discussion of the original NEP 29 proposal?
The only thing I could find was this post from Sebastian Berg, where he says at
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2019-October/080128.html
"We propose
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 1:21 PM Matthias Koeppe
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 5:49:50 AM UTC-7 William Stein wrote:
>
> To what extent does or could Conda with a little more work solve most
> of these problems? [...]
> I also think this section
> https://doc
as tons of dependencies.
>
> As usual, the biggest hurdle to making things work more seamlessly is
> manpower.
> Most of the niche packages that sage depends on are maintained by me and
> Julian and improvements
> to supporting conda in the sage build system are mostly Matthias
Hi,
To what extent does or could Conda with a little more work solve most
of these problems? There are some notes below from me poking around,
and I'm very optimistic.
I looked at
https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/conda.html
and I would love some further discussion of that and
rom it, send an
> email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/3c05b1b8-f8e3-4fb1-b39e-f296e5efd40bn%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/3c05b1b8-f8e3-4fb1-b39e-f2
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 12:27 PM David Roe wrote:
>
> I'm sorry to have prompted another flame war, but please keep the tone polite
> Dima and Matthias. I know that you're both frustrated at this issue being
> unresolved, but it's not appropriate to have a fight like this that goes to
> 2570
Hi Everybody,
Just a reminder of
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/blob/develop/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
In particular,
1. Be friendly and patient.
2. Be welcoming.
3. Be considerate.
4. Be respectful and polite.
As a community, we've agreed that these are very reasonable ways to
conduct ourselves on
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 10:40 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > For a long time it was very important for getting a functional Sage on
> > MacOS; is that no longer the case?
> Sorry, I don't understand.
>
> Noone I know builds Python (the only package that needs openssl) from source.
> For a long
I put a few remarks related to this in a notebook:
https://cocalc.com/wstein/support/SR-and-strings
Basically, converting to from strings via str hardly works anywhere in
Sage and that is by design, following the lead of Magma instead of
Pari. Instead Pickle is the thing that mostly works for
Hi,
There's is a discussion right now on HN about LLM's trained on code
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35657982
One of the comments https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35658118
points out that most of the non-GPL super permissive licenses require
explicit attribution when creating
Hi,
I don't know whether or not ChatGPT is trained on the source code of
SageMath, but one of the biggest publicly available training sets of
code is described here: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.15533
In that training set, they explicitly remove any GPL'd code (e.g.,
SageMath): "Permissive license
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 7:35 PM aw wrote:
> [...] You and your people have a *very strong* tendency to nitpick details
> instead of staying focused on the big picture.
You're right, respecting details is indeed a very strong
characteristic of professional mathematicians.
--
William
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 5:15 PM aw wrote:
> In high-precision environments like RealField(1000), Sage should *definitely*
> use the math semantics, because physics people, or engineers, or any other
> applied type folks, have zero use for 1000 bits of precision in anything that
> they do.
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 9:11 PM Nils Bruin wrote:
>
> It's certainly reasonable to not call a floating point field "RealField".
> C and python don't even do that: they call such elements floats. I'm less
> sure whether such a RealFloats field should be any less prominent than it
> is now. Plus
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 9:13 AM Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> is there any particular reason why the term 12/5*q is not subtracted
> away by the first basis element?
The answer is that M_2(Gamma0(11)) is represented internally as the
direct sum of the cuspidal and eisenstein subspaces. In
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 4:25 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2023-04-15 at 18:20 -0400, David Roe wrote:
> > I agree with William that you should refrain from insulting the Sage
> > developers, especially when the underlying problem comes from your
> > misunderstanding of how floating
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/blob/develop/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 2:39 PM aw wrote:
>
> Guys, this is serious. Any dev who starts reading this, give it a hard look,
> ok?
>
> Below I give some examples where Sage give the wrong answer, with no error
> message or any
Trac to GitHub for
the preliminary version of the workflow."
It seems like that banne could be updated a bit, now that it is April.
I do realize that there's still a lot being hashed out about the exact
workflow...
William
[1] https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/index.html
--
Best Regard
+1
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 1:40 PM Matthias Koeppe
wrote:
>
> On Saturday, March 25, 2023 at 12:52:00 PM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> I propose to introduce the notion of semistandard package.
>
>
> "Semistandard" sounds good to me.
>
> We have a few more packages that are of this type:
> -
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 12:13 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, 25 Mar 2023, 18:57 Matthias Koeppe, wrote:
>>
>> On Saturday, March 25, 2023 at 9:29:32 AM UTC-7 William Stein wrote:
>>
>> It seems to me that these days there are three
>&g
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 11:53 AM Matthias Koeppe
wrote:
>
> rpy2 is built by default when a suitable system R is detected.
Thanks. This is exactly my understanding.
The Sage docs https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/packaging.html define
standard, optional and experimental packages. The
Hi,
According to
https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/spkg/rpy2.html#spkg-rpy2
the rpy2 package is a "standard package". However, I just checked
multiple builds in various places of sage-9.8 and also the latest
master branch, and rpy2 is not installed.
I can see why rpy2 isn't
0 AM Oscar Benjamin
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 16:47, William Stein wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sage Devs,
> >
> > Any thoughts about enabling "Github Discussions" for SageMath on
> > Github now?
>
> I just want to share my experience of this feature be
Hi Sage Devs,
Any thoughts about enabling "Github Discussions" for SageMath on
Github now? The tab is already visible, but somebody has
to I think fully enable it and do some configuration.
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/discussions/landing
This can be used much like ask.sagemath.org or
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 8:45 AM John H Palmieri wrote:
> Hi William,
> There is nothing in our department's bylaws to provide for a delay of voting,
> but we have a chair and we have an executive committee, and the hope is that
> they care not only about the particular issue at hand, but also
On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 8:09 PM John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> The main response I saw to the requests for a slower process was from David
> Roe, saying, "Finally, since we're just voting on trac vs github I don't
> think there's a need to draw out the discussion until October 1, and several
>
> several developers asked for delays
The only governance mechanism we have for decision making in the Sage
project currently is a vote of the entire dev community. Thus there
is no way to consider your request to delay voting aside from having
even more voting.
-- William
On Wed, Oct 5,
ls from it, send an
> email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CAAWYfq2Vm4yakjdu8JQ3WF-Y0NK7s-B%3Dwug-b%2B5qKDOMw2yRvg%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CAA
On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 9:15 AM Matthias Koeppe
wrote:
>
> On Saturday, September 24, 2022 at 4:57:36 AM UTC-7 kcrisman wrote:
>>>
>>> On another note, I realize that the comment I made 6 years ago after
>>> Volker's comment is still relevant:
>>
>> "There's also the non-trivial (though not
Note also that prod(range(1,n)) does *NOT* just multiple 1 times 2
times 3 in order. Instead, it uses a tree approach so that the
multiplications involve objects with more balanced sizes, which is
much faster, e.g., for large integers multiplyling n*m with n and m
having similar sizes can
+1 for Github
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 10:23 AM David Roe wrote:
>
> Dear Sage developers,
> Following extensive discussion, both recently (prompted by issues upgrading
> the trac server) and over the last decade, we are calling a vote on switching
> Sage development from Trac to Github. We've
ame
> person, but different emails etc),
> see attachment
> >
> > I'm sure we could get a full list of author names from git.
> > David
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 12:35 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 5:30 PM William
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 4:09 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 11:51 AM kcrisman wrote:
> >
> >
> >>> "Subscribed to sage-devel" might not be a good criteria. For example,
> >>> Harald Schilly has been the webmaster of Sage since 2007 and likely
> >>> cares about this switch
favor of each system, and this thread can serve as a
> space for people to make clear their own reasoning for favoring one option
> over the other. This discussion has gotten heated at times, so remember to
> be considerate, respectful and polite: we are all aiming to make Sage better.
>
Here is a 3-minute section of a PyCon 2022 keynote by the steering
council discussing migration of CPython to GitHub:
https://youtu.be/m2R5shF1pLc?t=535
In particular, they talk about how much effort went into the
migration, and just how difficult it was, and how GitHub was
directly involved
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 10:27 AM Matthias Koeppe
wrote:
>
> On Sunday, September 18, 2022 at 10:14:26 AM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
>>
>> On Saturday, 17 September 2022 at 17:55:10 UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> The conversion of the Trac tickets to GitHub Issues/PRs only works in one
>>>
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 12:34 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> - Some people with strong opinions said that they are not ready to formulate
>> their views.
>>
>> My impression is that trac is now doing okay,
>
>
> Note that trac's bus factor is down to 1/3. It took efforts of Frederick,
> Jan, and
vel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/155dc41c-6d30-4792-923f-2ff85d831de7n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/155dc41c-6d30-4792-923f-2ff85d831de7n%40googlegroups.com?u
We took quick notes from the discussion during the short meeting here
- https://cocalc.com/wstein/sagedev/2022-09-15
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 8:19 AM William Stein wrote:
>
> I've also created an agenda file here:
>
> https://cocalc.com/wstein/sagedev/2022-09-15
>
&g
create a meeting and
> post the details here?
>
> Matthias
>
> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 8:16:42 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 3:54 PM William Stein wrote:
>> >
>> > Reminder -- that 30 minute Sage zoom meeting thing
Matthias just wrote that he is having technical troubles with zoom.
Here's where we will have the meeting instead:
https://meet.jit.si/d8a744b413e339d95fba907b81fb249609520161
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 8:16 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 3:54 PM William Stein
Reminder -- that 30 minute Sage zoom meeting thing that Matthias
organized is happening in a few minutes from right now at
https://ucdavis.zoom.us/j/92371662861?pwd=TDZKR0lKb2xzTGhiM0l3cnFmaGRadz09
(8:15 pacific time to be exact.)
--
William (http://wstein.org)
--
You received this message
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 2:17 AM Samuel Lelièvre
wrote:
> Increasingly, services such as GitHub and Google require
> users to have a mobile phone number, to share it with them,
> and to be able to receive text messages on them in order
> to be able to log in or access certain features.
I don't
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 6:25 AM TB wrote:
> Somewhere in this thread, or in a related thread, the trac backups were
> mentioned. It reminded me of the the incident
> https://www.asmeurer.com/blog/posts/the-sympy-hackerrank-dmca-incident/
> where SymPy was wrongfully accused of a copyright
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 7:00 PM edgardi...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> The choice of the sign is arbitrary. So why make this change? What is the
> benefit?
The answer to that question is what the website
http://luschny.de/math/zeta/The-Bernoulli-Manifesto.html
is all about. I think you have to read
On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 10:04 AM davida...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> > I'm curious if the change breaks any code anywhere else in Sage (e.g.,
> > maybe for computing q-expansions of modular forms?)...
>
> You guessed right. I did a quick local change to the bernoulli function and
> it indeed breaks
On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 7:17 AM Jeremy Tan wrote:
>
> My name is Jeremy Tan, or Parcly Taxel in the furry/MLP art scene. As of this
> post I am a recent graduate from the National University of Singapore with
> two degrees in maths and computer science.
>
> Over the past month I had a good read
+1 from me.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 9:18 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 10:40 AM Samuel Lelievre
> wrote:
> >
> > Echoing a message posted to the pari-users mailing list.
> >
> > https://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/archives/pari-users-2209/msg00015.html
> >
> >
> > --
Hi,
By not using GitHub we are losing many potential contributors to Sage.
GitHub is by far the most popular site for hosting of open source
projects, and potential Sage developers are likely to be familiar with
GitHub. Not using GitHub adds a huge barrier to entry for Sage
development.
For
On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 8:37 AM Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
> On Thursday, September 1, 2022 at 10:52:04 PM UTC-7 Frédéric Chapoton wrote:
>>
>> You are very welcome to help.
>
>
> Someone please add me to sagemath-admins so I can at least know what's
> happening
I have added you to the mailing
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/ea8d0d59-8815-4c1e-91a3-74bf3eb39cban%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
> .
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sage-devel" group.
> To u
Hi,
Are any sage devs or people reading this going to be at the MAA
Mathfest next week
https://www.maa.org/meetings/mathfest
There will be a CoCalc/Sage booth. I won't be there, but Blaec
Bejarano who works fulltime on CoCalc will be running it.
Please stop by and say "hello", get stickers, or
For CoCalc, where we have a bunch of different specific versions of
Sage pre-installed that all stay stable over *years*, we run a 1-2
pages long "./configure ..." command before I even do "make". At the
top it starts with
--with-system-python3=no \
--with-system-r=no \
It should work now. A certain person accidentally deleted the billing
account, and I've restored that and started the server.
William
On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 2:55 PM William Stein wrote:
>
> On it.
>
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 2:45 PM John H Palmieri
> wrote:
> &g
On it.
On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 2:45 PM John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> I can't access trac.sagemath.org. Can someone please give it a kick?
>
> --
> John
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sage-devel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop
what is on github directly. Also,
you can easily click "Edit" and in about 25 seconds you're running a
notebook with Sage!
William
On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 11:42 AM William Stein wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 1:42 AM Eric Gourgoulhon
> wrote:
> >
> > Le sam
Hi Sage Devs,
A few days ago we received a $500 donation from GitHub. It's part of
https://github.blog/2022-06-24-thank-you-to-our-maintainers/
*"To celebrate Maintainer Month, GitHub has invested an additional $500,000
to help sponsor the open source projects that it depends on."*
I think
On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 1:42 AM Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
>
> Le samedi 25 juin 2022 à 17:31:10 UTC+2, wst...@gmail.com a écrit :
>>
>> > There is some issue in the latex display of manifold maps:
>> > ParseError: KaTeX parse error: Undefined control sequence: \mbox at
>> > position 96:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 11:17 AM Eric Gourgoulhon
wrote:
>
>
>
> Le vendredi 24 juin 2022 à 18:52:00 UTC+2, wst...@gmail.com a écrit :
>>
>>
>> I also put a copy of these beautiful notebooks here:
>>
>> https://cocalc.com/wstein/support/IntroToManifolds
>>
>
> Thanks!
>
> There is some issue in
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 7:38 AM Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Andrzej Chrzeszczyk (Jan Kochanowski University of Kielce, Poland) has
> prepared a series of notebooks introducing differentiable manifolds at the
> textbook level with many examples from Sage and nice figures:
>
1 - 100 of 8567 matches
Mail list logo
