[sig-policy]Re: APNIC EC endorses policy proposals from APNIC 52

, route6 and ROAs in the APNIC Whois database. Regards, Sunny From: Aftab Siddiqui Sent: Tuesday, 7 December 2021 10:32 PM To: Srinivas Chendi Cc: mailman_SIG-policy Subject: Re: [sig-policy] APNIC EC endorses policy proposals from APNIC 52 Hi Sunny, prop-138: Restricting AS-ID in ROA

[sig-policy] APNIC DOCUMENT UPDATE: APNIC Policy Development Process

___ APNIC DOCUMENT UPDATE: APNIC Policy Development Process ___ Dear colleagues The "APNIC Policy Development Process" document was released as a draft document on 10

[sig-policy] Reminder: APNIC 51 Call for Policy Proposals

This is a reminder that the deadline set by the Policy SIG Chair for proposals to be discussed at APNIC 51 is 31 January 2021. If you have any ideas to improve policy, or wish to make an informational presentation about an aspect of resource management, please follow the instructions below. To

Re: [sig-policy] Final editorial comments on draft document

Hello Jordi, Thanks for your comments. We will get back to you soon. Regards Sunny -Original Message- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ Sent: Wednesday, 6 January 2021 6:02 AM To: Srinivas Chendi ; sig-policy@lists.apnic.net Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Final editorial comments on draft

[sig-policy] Acting Chair of Policy SIG

Dear Colleagues On behalf of the APNIC Policy SIG, APNIC Secretariat, and the Community, we would like to thank Sumon Ahmed Sabir for the work he has done as SIG Chair and wish him well in the work he will be doing with the APNIC Executive Council. Bertrand Cherrier, current Co-Chair, will serve

Re: [sig-policy] prop-133: Clarification on Sub-Assignments

Hi Jordi, On 24/02/2020 1:39 pm, Srinivas (Sunny) Chendi wrote: >> >> One more request for the secretariat. Could you please provide stats >> on the number of ISP (not end-users) assignments, for example in the >> last 12-15 years, in order to understand if this is a real requirement? > >

Re: [sig-policy] prop-134: PDP Update withdrawn by author

Hi Jordi, Thanks for your suggestion. Secretariat will consult with the APNIC EC. Regards Sunny On 24/02/2020 8:53 pm, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > Hi Bertrand, all, > > As indicated in the meeting, the withdraw of this proposal is "temporary", in > view of the commitment from the

Re: [sig-policy] prop-133: Clarification on Sub-Assignments

Hello Jordi, On 22/02/2020 2:20 pm, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > Hi all, > > After my previous response to Owen, I can't find anymore any the text in the > actual policy (neither guidelines) about assignments. So, I'm wondering if I > was wrong, or it has been removed at some point and I

Re: [sig-policy] prop-133: Clarification on Sub-Assignments

Hi Jordi, On 21/02/2020 3:20 pm, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > Thanks Bertrand, > > I’m fine as well with this option. Repeating it here: > > "Assigned address space is address space that is delegated to an LIR, or > end-user, for specific, documented purposes and exclusive use within the >

Re: [sig-policy] prop-134-v001: Secretariat impact assessment

ease, update the version number of this proposal with these changes, which > I guess clears your impact assessment as well. > > Regards, > Jordi > @jordipalet > > > > El 14/2/20 14:47, "Srinivas Chendi" nombre de su...@apnic.net> escribió:

Re: [sig-policy] prop-133-v001: Secretariat impact assessment

for exclusive use within the infrastructure they operate. > > Please, update the version number of this proposal with this change, which I > guess it clears your impact assesment as well. > > Regards, > Jordi > @jordipalet > > > > El 14/2/20

[sig-policy] prop-130-v002: Secretariat impact assessment

Dear SIG members, Here is the Secretariat impact assessment for proposal “prop-130-v002: Modification of transfer policies” and the same is also published at: https://www.apnic.net/community/policy/proposals/prop-130/ Staff comments -- Possible difficulties in verifying

[sig-policy] prop-134-v001: Secretariat impact assessment

Dear SIG members, Here is the Secretariat impact assessment for proposal “prop-134-v001: PDP Update” and the same is also published at: https://www.apnic.net/community/policy/proposals/prop-134/ Staff comments -- No foreseen change on APNIC Services procedures or systems as a

[sig-policy] End of Final editorial comments on draft policy document

__ End of Final editorial comments on draft policy document ___ The deadline for final editorial comments on draft policy document closed on 03 February 2020.

[sig-policy] APNIC EC endorses policy proposals from APNIC 48

APNIC EC endorses policy proposals Dear Colleagues The APNIC EC (Executive Council) endorsed the two proposals at its meeting on 3-4 December 2019.

[sig-policy] Reminder - SIG Mailing List Acceptable Use

Dear SIG Members, As a reminder, use of the Special Interest Group (SIG) mailing lists is subject to the SIG Charter, a copy of the Policy SIG Charter may be found here https://www.apnic.net/community/policy/policy-sig/ The SIG mailing lists have been established to allow for effective

Re: [sig-policy] editorial clarification on prop-131

Hi Jordi, Apologies for the error. This is now corrected and published. Regards Sunny On 12/09/2019 3:43 pm, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > Sorry, confusing myself (again). > > The right wording in both places of the text is: > > 5.2.4.3. Assignments shorter than a /48 to a single End Site >

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v002: AS0 for Bogons

Hi all, If this proposal reaches consensus and endorsed by the APNIC EC, this is how we would implement the policy. **Creation of AS0 (Zero) ROA - Based on the publicly available “delegated-apnic-extended-latest” stats file at https://ftp.apnic.net/stats/apnic/ - All resources (IPv4 and IPv6)

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v002: AS0 for Bogons

Hi Javed, Thanks for your email and for your participation in the policy development process. We're consulting our experts to provide a response to your query soon. Please allow us sometime. Regards Sunny On 24/08/2019 12:28 am, Javed Khan wrote: > For now, I'm neither for or against this

[sig-policy] End of Final editorial comments on draft policy document

__ End of Final editorial comments on draft policy document ___ The deadline for final editorial comments on draft policy document closed on 02 July 2019.

[sig-policy] Final editorial comments on draft policy document

__ Final editorial comments on draft policy document ___ APNIC seeks final editorial comments on the following draft changes to the APNIC Internet Number

Re: [sig-policy] Amendment of SIG Charter

Hi Jordi, You're right! We haven't been able to enable DMARC on our mailman due to a number of dependencies and risks but we are looking into migrating to a new server soon. Regards Sunny On 15/05/2019 1:19 am, Srinivas Chendi wrote: Thanks Jordi. FYI, consulting with our technical team

Re: [sig-policy] Amendment of SIG Charter

ling list. > > And somehow I’m not receiving your emails sent to the policy-sig mailing > list :) > > On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 11:15 pm, Srinivas Chendi <mailto:su...@apnic.net>> wrote: > > Hi Jordi, > > Thanks for your contribution to this discussion s

Re: [sig-policy] Amendment of SIG Charter

Hi Jordi, Thanks for your contribution to this discussion so far. As per the SIG Guidelines, Policy SIG Chair is responsible to accept or reject a proposal and to check if it is in scope of the active SIG charter. Please refer to the section 2.4 of SIG Guidelines

[sig-policy] End of Final editorial comments on draft policy document

__ End of Final editorial comments on draft policy document ___ The deadline for final editorial comments on draft policy document closed on 07 May 2019.

[sig-policy] Final editorial comments on draft policy document

__ Final editorial comments on draft policy document ___ APNIC seeks final editorial comments on the following draft changes to the APNIC Internet Number

[sig-policy] APNIC EC endorses prop-125 - Validation of abuse-mailbox and other IRT emails

___ APNIC EC endorses policy proposal ___ Dear colleagues The APNIC EC (Executive Council) endorsed the proposal "prop-125: Validation of abuse-mailbox and

[sig-policy] Reminder: APNIC 47 - Call for Proposals for Policy SIG

This is a reminder that the deadline set by the Policy SIG Chair for proposals to be discussed at APNIC 47 is less than two weeks away. If you have any ideas to improve policy, or wish to make an informational presentation about an aspect of resource management, please follow the instructions

Re: [sig-policy] BoF on Leasing - Remote Participation

Hi Skeeve, Thanks! Yes, we will broadcast this session live with one-way audio/video and chat. -Sunny On 21/02/2014 11:50 AM, Skeeve Stevens wrote: Good on Sunny! He always comes though ;-) ...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd ske...@eintellegonetworks.com