On Oct 14, 2010, at 1:13 AM, Maglione Roberta wrote:
In the specific case being able to provide load-balancing and redundancy in
DS-Lite scenario is a requirement for us, thus I would like to see a solution
for this coming from IETF.
So your requirement is to have load balancing, not to have
;
Chairs Dhc; magli...@core3.amsl.com; Softwire Chairs; Ullio Mario
Subject: Re: [Softwires] DHCPv6 AFTR name option is needed
Hi Hemant,
As I know, since 6rd BRs are stateless, so you can configure an
anycast address for load balancing stuff.
Thanks,
washam
On Oct 12, 2010, at 11:49 PM, mohamed.boucad...@orange-ftgroup.com
mohamed.boucad...@orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
If we adopt the sub-option scheme with the following values:
1AFTR IP Addres
2AFTR Name
Mohamed, Roberta, you seem to have a very strong opinion that is based on the
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 08:49:47AM +0200, mohamed.boucad...@orange-ftgroup.com
wrote:
Thank you for this clarification.
I think you may have misunderstood - I did not mean that the IESG's
main complaint was with the complex normative requirements, I meant
that this would be a fair way (I hope)
Cc : Ralph Droms; draft-ietf-softwire-ds-lite-tunnel-opt...@tools.ietf.org;
Ullio Mario; Chairs Dhc; Softwire Chairs; Softwires; Maglione Roberta
Objet : Re: [Softwires] DHCPv6 AFTR name option is needed
On Oct 11, 2010, at 10:42 PM, mohamed.boucad...@orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
Do you suggest
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 05:36:48PM +0200, mohamed.boucad...@orange-ftgroup.com
wrote:
If there is a real issue with defining two DHCPv6 options (which I don't
see),
The problem of defining two options that convey the same configuration
point is a problem we call aliasing. Section 6 (Avoid
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 07:26:10AM -0700, Ted Lemon wrote:
If you absolutely have to have the FQDN option, then get rid of the IP
address option.That eliminates the interoperability problem. In
any case, though, you need to issue a new draft.
As a B4 implementor, I reject the onerus
Chairs
Cc: softwires@ietf.org
Subject: [Softwires] DHCPv6 AFTR name option is needed
Dear authors, chairs,
We are surprised to see the AFTR name option being removed from the latest
version of this draft:
http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-softwire-ds-lite-tunnel-option-05.txt
On Oct 12, 2010, at 4:58 PM, Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote:
I appreciate the feedback on DHCPv6 design style to not use two entities to
represent the same primitive but if DHCPv6 is such a stick in the mud, we
could go with some other control mechanism. After all several protocols use
FQDN
.amsl.com; Softwire Chairs;
Softwires
Subject: Re: [Softwires] DHCPv6 AFTR name option is needed
Dear Raplh,
Do you suggest the I-D should elaborate further on the FQDN use cases so
this to be acceptable by the IESG?
Chairs, how should we proceed? The version which passed the WG LC is not
the 05
Of mohamed.boucad...@orange-ftgroup.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 1:42 AM
To: Ralph Droms;
draft-ietf-softwire-ds-lite-tunnel-opt...@tools.ietf.org
Cc: Ullio Mario; Chairs Dhc; magli...@core3.amsl.com; Softwire Chairs;
Softwires
Subject: Re: [Softwires] DHCPv6 AFTR name option is needed
octobre 2010 02:00
À : Softwires WG
Cc : BOUCADAIR Mohamed NCPI/NAD/TIP;
draft-ietf-softwire-ds-lite-tunnel-opt...@tools.ietf.org; Softwire Chairs;
Ullio Mario; Jari Arkko; Ralph Droms; Maglione Roberta
Objet : Re: [Softwires] DHCPv6 AFTR name option is needed
Roberta, Mohamed,
AFTR name
[mailto:softwires-boun...@ietf.org] De la part
de Ralph Droms
Envoyé : lundi 11 octobre 2010 20:46
À : draft-ietf-softwire-ds-lite-tunnel-opt...@tools.ietf.org
Cc : Ullio Mario; Chairs Dhc; Softwire Chairs; Softwires
Objet : Re: [Softwires] DHCPv6 AFTR name option is needed
(Adding dhc WG chairs to the thread
Subject: RE: [Softwires] DHCPv6 AFTR name option is needed
Dear Tomek,
Thank you for this clarification.
Providing the IP address in the option is not flexible enough and especially it
may not be recommended to achieve load balancing. Otherwise the DHCPv6 server
should act as a load balancer
] On Behalf
Of mohamed.boucad...@orange-ftgroup.com
Sent: giovedì 7 ottobre 2010 10.07
To: draft-ietf-softwire-ds-lite-tunnel-opt...@tools.ietf.org; Softwire Chairs
Cc: softwires@ietf.org
Subject: [Softwires] DHCPv6 AFTR name option is needed
Dear authors, chairs,
We are surprised to see the AFTR
Cc: softwires@ietf.org
Subject: [Softwires] DHCPv6 AFTR name option is needed
Dear authors, chairs,
We are surprised to see the AFTR name option being removed from the latest
version of this draft:
http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-softwire-ds-lite-tunnel-option-05.txt
NCPI/NAD/TIP;
draft-ietf-softwire-ds-lite-tunnel-opt...@tools.ietf.org; Softwire Chairs;
Ullio Mario; Jari Arkko; Ralph Droms; Maglione Roberta
Objet : Re: [Softwires] DHCPv6 AFTR name option is needed
Roberta, Mohamed,
AFTR name option was removed as a result of a concerns raised by Jari Arkko
17 matches
Mail list logo
