Dear list,
this sounds stupid, but how to get a full working copy of SOLR?
What I have tried so far:
- started with LucidWorks SOLR. Installs fine, runs fine but has an old tika
version
and can only handle some PDFs.
- changed to SOLR trunk. Installs fine, runs fine but luke 1.0.1 argues
Sixten Otto wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Bernd Fehling
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
- changed to SOLR branch_3x. Installs fine, runs fine, luke works fine but
the extraction with /update/extract (ExtractingRequestHandler) only replies
the metadata but not the content
can nobody help me or want :D
As already someone said:
- install Eclipse
- add Jetty Webapp Plugin to Eclipse
- add svn plugin to Eclipse
- download with svn the repository from trunk
- change to lucene dir and run ant package
- change to solr dir and run ant dist
- setup with Run
Actually, this is one of the biggest disadvantage of Solr for multilingual
content.
Solr is field based which means you have to know the language _before_ you feed
the content to a specific field and process the content for that field.
This results in having separate fields for each language.
Hi list,
is this true, no downloaded copy of the documentprocessor
anywhere available?
Regards,
Bernd
Bernd Fehling schrieb:
Was anyone able to get a copy of:
http://sesat.no/svn/sesat-documentprocessor/
Unfortunately it is offline.
Would be pleased to get a copy.
Regards,
Bernd
Hi,
I suggest using the following fieldType for your field:
fieldType name=sint class=solr.SortableIntField sortMissingLast=true
omitNorms=true/
Regards
Bernd
Am 04.01.2012 14:40, schrieb umaswayam:
Hi,
We want to sort our records based on some sequence which is like
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Hi Uma,
i don't understand what you're looking for.
Do you need to sort on fields of type double with precision 2 or what?
In your example you were talking about
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14.
Regards,
Bernd
Am 06.01.2012 07:11, schrieb umaswayam:
Hi Bernd,
The column which comes
Hi list,
after changing DIH to multi-theaded (4 threads) I get sometimes an exception.
This is not always the case and I never had any problems with single-threaded
at all.
I'm using Solr 3.5 but also tried branch_3x (3.6) and could see this with both
versions.
Don't know why this comes up
After browsing through the issues it looks like something belonging to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2694
Am 11.01.2012 14:08, schrieb Bernd Fehling:
Hi list,
after changing DIH to multi-theaded (4 threads) I get sometimes an exception.
This is not always the case and I never
Hi Mikhail,
thanks for pointing me to the issue.
Regards, Bernd
Am 11.01.2012 21:47, schrieb Mikhail Khludnev:
FYI,
it's https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2804
I'm trying to address it.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Bernd Fehling
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
After
Yes and No.
If using Synonyms funtionality out of the box you have to do it at index time.
But if using it at query time, like we do, you have to do some programming.
We have connected a thesaurus which is actually using synonyms functionality at
query time.
There are some pitfalls to take care
On January 11th I downloaded branch_3x with svn into eclipse (indigo).
Compiled and tested it without problems.
Today I updated my branch_3x from repository.
Compiled fine but get now SolrException when starting.
Jan 31, 2012 1:50:15 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore initListeners
INFO: [] Added
After changing the below suggested lines and compiling the branch_3x runs fine
now.
SolrException is gone.
Regards,
Bernd
Am 31.01.2012 14:21, schrieb Bernd Fehling:
On January 11th I downloaded branch_3x with svn into eclipse (indigo).
Compiled and tested it without problems.
Today I updated
Hi,
run-jetty-run issue #9:
...
In the VM Arguments of your launch configuration set
-Drjrxml=./jetty.xml
If jetty.xml is in the root of your project it will be used (you can also use a
fully
qualified path name).
The UI port, context and WebApp dir are ignored, since you can define them in
Use
sprayer, washer
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.SynonymFilterFactory
Regards
Bernd
Am 23.02.2012 07:03, schrieb remi tassing:
Same question here...
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012, geeky2gee...@hotmail.com wrote:
hello all,
i need to support the
What is netstat telling you about the connections on the servers?
Any connections in CLOSE_WAIT (passive close) hanging?
Saw this on my servers last week.
Used a little proggi to spoof a local connection on those servers ports
and was able to fake the TCP-stack to close those connections.
It
Hi list,
I have looked into the CLOSE_WAIT problem and created an issue with a patch to
fix this.
A search for CLOSE_WAIT shows that there are many Apache projects hit by this
problem.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3280
Can someone recheck the patch (it belongs to SnapPuller)
Nothing against RankingAlgorithm and your work, which sounds great, but
I think that YOUR Solr 4.0 might confuse some Solr users and/or newbees.
As far as I know the next official release will be 3.6.
So your Solr 4.0 is a trunk snapshot or what?
If so, which revision number?
Or have you done
There were some changes in solrconfig.xml between solr3.1 and solr3.5.
Always read CHANGES.txt when switching to a new version.
Also helpful is comparing both versions of solrconfig.xml from the examples.
Are you sure you need a MaxPermSize of 5g?
Use jvisualvm to see what you really need.
This
You might have a look at:
http://www.basistech.com/lucene/
Am 12.04.2012 11:52, schrieb Michael Ludwig:
Given an input of Windjacke (probably wind jacket in English), I'd
like the code that prepares the data for the index (tokenizer etc) to
understand that this is a Jacke (jacket) so that a
Paul,
nearly two years ago I requested an evaluation license and tested BASIS Tech
Rosette for Lucene Solr. Was working excellent but the price much much to
high.
Yes, they also have compound analysis for several languages including German.
Just configure your pipeline in solr and setup the
I'm trying to get the default operator of a schema in solr 3.6 but unfortunately
everything is deprecated.
The API solr 3.6 says:
getQueryParserDefaultOperator() - Method in class
org.apache.solr.schema.IndexSchema
Deprecated.
use getSolrQueryParser().getDefaultOperator()
I just looked through my logs of solr 3.6 and saw several 0 hits which were
not seen with solr 3.5.
While tracing this down it turned out that edismax don't like queries of type
...q=(text:ide)... any more.
If parentheses around the query term the edismax fails with solr 3.6.
Can anyone
I have tried all hints from internet for debugging a junit test of
solr 3.6 under eclipse but didn't succeed.
eclipse and everything is running, compiling, debugging with runjettyrun.
Tests have no errors.
Ant from command line ist also running with ivy, e.g.
ant -Dtestmethod=testUserFields
--
*
Bernd FehlingUniversitätsbibliothek Bielefeld
Dipl.-Inform. (FH)Universitätsstr. 25
Tel. +49 521 106-4060 Fax. +49 521 106-4052
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de33615 Bielefeld
BASE
I guess you should give JVM more memory.
When starting to find a good value for -Xmx I oversized and set
it to Xmx20G and Xms20G. Then I monitored the system and saw that JVM is
between 5G and 10G (java7 with G1 GC).
Now it is finally set to Xmx11G and Xms11G for my system with 1 core and 38
)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:122)
o
any ideas?
I,ve created another index with lucene 4.0 and this luke open the index
well.
thanks in advance
--
*
Bernd FehlingBielefeld University
I just downloaded, compiled and opened an optimized solr 4.0 index
in read only without problems.
Could browse through the docs, search with different analyzers, ...
Looks good.
Am 19.11.2012 08:49, schrieb Toke Eskildsen:
On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 08:10 +0100, Bernd Fehling wrote:
I think
There are also other solutions:
Multi-word synonym filter (synonym expansion)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4499
Since Solr 3.4 i have my own solution which might be obsolete if
LUCENE-4499 will be in a released version.
Dear list,
after going from 3.6 to 4.0 I see exceptions in my logs.
It turned out that somehow the q-parameter was empty.
With 3.6 the q.alt in the solrconfig.xml worked as fallback but now with 4.0
I get exceptions.
I use it like this:
SolrParams params = req.getParams();
String q =
Hi Hoss,
my config has definately not changed and it worked with 3.6 and 3.6.1.
Yes I have a custom plugin and if q was empty with 3.6 it picked automatically
q.alt from solrconfig.xml.
This all was done with params.get()
With 4.x this is gone due to some changes in DefaultSolrParams(?).
Which is
Hi Uwe,
sorting should be well prepared.
First rough check is fieldCache. You can see it with SolrAdmin Stats.
The insanity_count there should be 0 (zero).
Only sort on fields which are prepared for sorting and make sense to be sorted.
Do only faceting on fields which make sense. I've seen
Hi Shawn,
actually I use munin for monitoring but just checked with jvisualvm
which also runs fine for remote monitoring.
You might try the following:
http://www.codefactorycr.com/java-visualvm-to-profile-a-remote-server.html
You have to:
- generate a policy file on the server to be monitored
-
Now this must be said, thanks for solr 4.1 (and lucene 4.1)!
Great improvements compared to 4.0.
After building the first 4.1 index I thought the index was broken, but had no
error messages anywhere.
Why I thought it was damaged?
The index size went down from 167 GB (solr 4.0) to 115 GB (solr
Hi list,
I recognized that the result order is FIFO if documents have the same score.
I think this is due to the fact that documents which are indexed later get a
higher
internal document ID and the output for documents with the same score starts
with the lowest internal document ID and raises.
A question to the experts,
why is the replicated index copied from its temporary location (index.x)
to the real index directory and NOT moved?
Copying over 100s of gigs takes some time, moving is just changing the file
system link.
Also, instead of first deleting the old index, why not
Am 02.02.2013 03:48, schrieb Yonik Seeley:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Bernd Fehling
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
A question to the experts,
why is the replicated index copied from its temporary location
(index.x)
to the real index directory and NOT moved
Hi list,
after upgrading from solr4.0 to solr4.1 and running it for two weeks now
it turns out that replication has problems and unpredictable results.
My installation is single index 41 mio. docs / 115 GB index size / 1 master / 3
slaves.
- the master builds a new index from scratch once a week
to slave,
more like a sync?
Am 11.02.2013 09:29, schrieb Bernd Fehling:
Hi list,
after upgrading from solr4.0 to solr4.1 and running it for two weeks now
it turns out that replication has problems and unpredictable results.
My installation is single index 41 mio. docs / 115 GB index size
OK then index generation and index version are out of count when it comes
to verify that master and slave index are in sync.
What else is possible?
The strange thing is if master is 2 or more generations ahead of slave then it
works!
With your logic the slave must _always_ be one generation
May be the info about index version is pulled from the repeaters
data/replication.properties file and the content of that file
is wrong.
Had something similar and only solution for me was deleting the
replication.properties file. But no guarantee about this.
Actually the replication is pretty
Till now I used jetty and got 2 week as the longest uptime until OOM.
I just switched to tomcat6 and will see how that one behaves but
I think its not a problem of the servlet container.
Solr is pretty unstable if having a huge database.
Actually this can't be blamed directly to Solr it is a
It is definately Lucenes fieldCache making the trouble.
Restart your solr and monitor it with jvisualvm, especially OldGen heap.
When it gets to 100 percent filled use jmap to dump heap of your system.
Then use Eclipse Memory Analyzer http://www.eclipse.org/mat/ and
open the heap dump. You will
Dear list,
is there a deeper logic behind why the segment.gen file is not
replicated with solr 3.2?
Is it obsolete because I have a single segment?
Regards,
Bernd
Any JAVA_OPTS set?
Do not use -XX:+OptimizeStringConcat or -XX:+AggressiveOpts flags.
Am 02.08.2011 12:01, schrieb alexander sulz:
Hello folks,
I'm using the latest stable Solr release - 3.3 and I encounter strange
phenomena with it.
After about 19 hours it just crashes, but I can't find
Is there any knowledge on this list about the performance
crossover between a single index and sharding and
when to change from a single index to sharding?
E.g. if index size is larger than 150GB and num of docs is
more than 25 mio. then it is better to change from single index
to sharding and
On 02.08.2011 21:00, Shawn Heisey wrote:
...
I did try some early tests with a single large index. Performance was pretty
decent once it got warmed up, but I was worried about how it would
perform under a heavy load, and how it would cope with frequent updates. I
never really got very far
:
Replies inline.
On 8/3/2011 2:24 AM, Bernd Fehling wrote:
To show that I compare apples and oranges here are my previous FAST Search
setup:
- one master server (controlling, logging, search dispatcher)
- six index server (4.25 mio docs per server, 5 slices per index)
(searching and indexing
I have now updated to solr 3.3 but segment.gen is still not replicated.
Any idea why, is it a bug or a feature?
Should I write a jira issue for it?
Regards
Bernd
Am 29.07.2011 14:10, schrieb Bernd Fehling:
Dear list,
is there a deeper logic behind why the segment.gen file is not
replicated
and then
replicated, but segment.gen was not replicated.
Due to your explanation NFS could not be reliable any more.
So my idea either a bug or a feature and the experts will know :-)
Regards
Bernd
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Bernd Fehling
bernd.fehl
, and not a 32 bit Java?
Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com
www.sirsidynix.com
-Original Message-
From: Bernd Fehling [mailto:bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 2:39 AM
To: solr-user
Hi list,
is there a string cut-off filter to limit the length
of a KeywordTokenized string?
So the string should not be dropped, only limitited to a
certain length.
Regards
Bernd
of a KeywordTokenized string?
So the string should not be dropped, only limitited to a
certain length.
Regards
Bernd
--
*
Bernd FehlingUniversitätsbibliothek Bielefeld
Dipl.-Inform. (FH)Universitätsstr
Hi list,
while searching with debug on I see strange query parsing:
str name=rawquerystringidentifier:ub.uni-bielefeld.de/str
str name=querystringidentifier:ub.uni-bielefeld.de/str
str name=parsedquery
+MultiPhraseQuery(identifier:(ub.uni-bielefeld.de ub) uni bielefeld de)
/str
str
From what I see on my slaves, yes.
After replication has finished and new index is in place and new reader has
started
I have always a write.lock file in my index directory on slaves, even though
the index
on master is optimized.
Regards
Bernd
Am 10.08.2011 09:12, schrieb Pranav Prakash:
Sure there is actually no optimizing on the slave needed,
but after calling optimize on the slave the write.lock will be removed.
So why is the replication process not doing this?
Regards
Bernd
Am 10.08.2011 10:57, schrieb Shalin Shekhar Mangar:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Bernd Fehling
--
*
Bernd FehlingUniversitätsbibliothek Bielefeld
Dipl.-Inform. (FH)Universitätsstr. 25
Tel. +49 521 106-4060 Fax. +49 521 106-4052
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de
It turned out that there is a sorting issue with solr 3.3.
As fas as I could trace it down currently:
4 docs in the index and a search for *:*
sorting on field dccreator_sort in descending order
The issue was located in a 31 million docs index and i have already reduced it
to a reproducable 4 documents index. It is stock solr 3.3.0.
Yes, the documents are also in the wrong order as the field sort values.
Just added only the field sort values to the email to keep it short.
I will produce a
I have created an issue with test attached.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2713
Will try to figure out whats going wrong.
Regards
Bernd
http://www.base-search.net/
Am 13.08.2011 16:20, schrieb Bernd Fehling:
The issue was located in a 31 million docs index and i have already
Hi list,
I have fixed an issue and created a patch (SOLR-2726) but how to
change Status and Resolution in jira?
And how to commit this, any idea?
Regards,
Bernd
How about using jmap or jvisualvm?
Or even connecting with eclipse to the process for live analysis?
Am 08.09.2011 11:07, schrieb Rohit:
Nope not getting anything here also.
Regards,
Rohit
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Li [mailto:zongjie...@gmail.com]
Sent: 08 September 2011 08:09
I'm in the need of skipping some query analysis steps for some
queries. Or more precisely, make it switchable with a query
parameter.
Use case:
fieldType name=text_spec class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100
autoGeneratePhraseQueries=true
analyzer type=index
charFilter
Dear list,
while writing some TokenFilter for my analyzer chain I need access to
the query string from inside of my TokenFilter for some comparison, but the
Filters are working with a TokenStream and get seperate Tokens.
Currently I couldn't get any access to the query string.
Any idea how to
Dear list,
just in case you are planning to integrate or combine a thesaurus with Solr
the following report might help you.
BASE - Solr and the multilingual EuroVoc Thesaurus
http://www.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/~befehl/base/solr/eurovoc.html
In brief:
It explains how a working solution is possible
Hi Otis,
I can't find the download for the free SPM.
What Hardware and OS do I need for installing SPM to monitor my servers?
Regards
Bernd
Am 07.12.2011 18:47, schrieb Otis Gospodnetic:
Hi Dmitry,
You should use SPM for Solr - it exposes all Solr metrics and more (JVM, system
info, etc.)
Because I'm using solr from trunk and not from lucid imagination
I was missing KStemmer. So I decided to add this stemmer to my installation.
After some modifications KStemmer is now working fine as stand-alone.
Now I have a KStemmerFilter.
Next will be to write the KStemmerFilterFactory.
I
Dear list,
I'm trying to delta-import with datasource FileDataSource and
processor FileListEntityProcessor. I want to load only files
which are newer than dataimport.properties - last_index_time.
It looks like that newerThan=${dataimport.last_index_time} is
without any function.
Can it be that
Hi Jakub,
I have ported the KStemmer for use in most recent Solr trunk version.
My stemmer is located in the lib directory of Solr solr/lib/KStemmer-2.00.jar
because it belongs to Solr.
Write it as FilterFactory and use it as Filter like:
filter
? :)
Cheers,
Jakub Godawa.
2010/10/29 Bernd Fehling bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de:
Hi Jakub,
I have ported the KStemmer for use in most recent Solr trunk version.
My stemmer is located in the lib directory of Solr
solr/lib/KStemmer-2.00.jar
because it belongs to Solr.
Write
res/tables:
readme.txt stemmer_1000.out stemmer_100.out stemmer_2000.out
stemmer_200.out stemmer_500.out stemmer_700.out
2010/11/2 Bernd Fehling bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de:
Hi Jakub,
if you unzip your stempel-1.0.jar do you have the
required directory structure and file
Dear list,
solr/lucene has a strange problem.
I'm currently using apache-solr-4.0-2010-10-12_08-05-48
I have written a MessageDigest for fields which generally works.
Part of my schema.xml is:
...
fieldType name=text_md class=solr.TextField
analyzer type=index
tokenizer
Hi Rita,
thanks for the advice, one problem solved.
source start,end is now set to the correct value by the filter.
After further debugging it looks like this is a bug in Lucene indexer.
I wonder that noone ever noticed this...
Kind regards,
Bernd
Am 23.11.2010 09:07, schrieb Bernd Fehling
29.11.2010 14:30, schrieb Bernd Fehling:
Dear list,
a question about Solr SignatureUpdateProcessorFactory:
for (String field : sigFields) {
SolrInputField f = doc.getField(field);
if (f != null) {
*sig.add(field);
Object o = f.getValue();
if (o instanceof String
Am 29.11.2010 14:55, schrieb Markus Jelsma:
On Monday 29 November 2010 14:51:33 Bernd Fehling wrote:
Dear list,
another suggestion about SignatureUpdateProcessorFactory.
Why can I make signatures of several fields and place the
result in one field but _not_ make a signature of one field
As mentioned, in the typical case it's important that the field names be
included in the signature, but i imagine there would be cases where you
wouldn't want them included (like a simple concat Signature for building
basic composite keys)
I think the Signature API could definitely be
Am 30.11.2010 10:56, schrieb Greg Smith:
Hi,
I have written a plugin to filter on email types and keep those tokens,
however when I run it in the analysis in the admin it all works fine.
But when I use the data import handler to import the data and set the field
type it doesn't remove
.
Are we wrong with that assumption, or do people experience similar import
times with this amount of data to be imported?
thanks!
-robert
--
*
Bernd FehlingUniversitätsbibliothek Bielefeld
Dipl.-Inform. (FH
Dear list,
some questions about the names of the index files.
With an older Solr 4.x version from trunk my index looks like:
_2t1.fdt
_2t1.fdx
_2t1.fnm
_2t1.frq
_2t1.nrm
_2t1.prx
_2t1.tii
_2t1.tis
segments_2
segments.gen
With a most recent version from trunk it looks like:
_3a9.fdt
_3a9.fdx
Because this is also posted for solr-user and from some earlier
experiences with solr from trunk I think this is also recommended
for solr users living from trunk, right?
So solr trunk builds directly with lucene trunk?
Bernd
Am 05.01.2011 11:55, schrieb Michael McCandless:
If you are using
Hello list,
is it possible to load only selected documents with XPathEntityProcessor?
While loading docs I want to drop/skip/ignore documents with missing URL.
Example:
documents
document
titlefirst title/title
ididentifier_01/id
Hi list,
currently the Transformers return row but can I skip
or drop a row from the Transformer?
If so, what should I return in that case, an empty row?
Regards,
Bernd
Hi Gora,
thanks a lot, very nice solution, works perfectly.
I will dig more into ScriptTransformer, seems to be very powerful.
Regards,
Bernd
Am 08.01.2011 14:38, schrieb Gora Mohanty:
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Bernd Fehling
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
Hello list
Dear list,
while trying different options with DIH and SciptTransformer I also
tried using the required=true option for a field.
I have 3 records:
documents
document
titlefirst title/title
ididentifier_01/id
linkhttp://www.foo.com/path/bar.html/link
/document
Hi Koji,
I'm using apache-solr-4.0-2010-11-24_09-25-17 from trunk.
A grep for SOLR-1973 in CHANGES.txt says that it should have been fixed.
Strange...
Regards,
Bernd
Am 10.01.2011 16:14, schrieb Koji Sekiguchi:
(11/01/10 23:26), Bernd Fehling wrote:
Dear list,
while trying different
Dear list,
what is the LukeRequestHandler histogram telling me?
Couldn't find any explanation and would be pleased to have it explained.
Many thanks in advance,
Bernd
:15 PM, Bernd Fehling
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
Dear list,
what is the LukeRequestHandler histogram telling me?
Couldn't find any explanation and would be pleased to have it explained.
Many thanks in advance,
Bernd
Looks like this is a bug and I should write a jira issue for it?
Regards
Bernd
Am 20.01.2011 11:30, schrieb Bernd Fehling:
Hi list,
after sending full-import=trueclean=truecommit=true
Solr 4.x (apache-solr-4.0-2010-11-24_09-25-17) responds with:
- DataImporter doFullImport
.
Try it out with additional parameter optimize=true
- Espen
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Bernd Fehling
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
Hi list,
after sending full-import=trueclean=truecommit=true
Solr 4.x (apache-solr-4.0-2010-11-24_09-25-17) responds with:
- DataImporter
:12, schrieb Espen Amble Kolstad:
I think optimize only ever gets done when either a full-import or
delta-import is done. You could optimize the normal way though see:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages
- Espen
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Bernd Fehling
bernd.fehl...@uni
Dear list,
after loading some documents via DIH which also include urls
I get this yellow XML error page as search result from solr admin GUI
after a search.
It says XML processing error not well-formed.
The code it argues about is:
arr name=dcurls
strhttp://eprints.soton.ac.uk/43350//str
, schrieb Bernd Fehling:
Dear list,
after loading some documents via DIH which also include urls
I get this yellow XML error page as search result from solr admin GUI
after a search.
It says XML processing error not well-formed.
The code it argues about is:
arr name=dcurls
strhttp
February 2011 08:59:27 Bernd Fehling wrote:
Dear list,
after loading some documents via DIH which also include urls
I get this yellow XML error page as search result from solr admin GUI
after a search.
It says XML processing error not well-formed.
The code it argues about is:
arr name=dcurls
the
JSONResponseWriter.
On Friday 11 February 2011 15:45:23 Bernd Fehling wrote:
Hi Markus,
yes it looks like the same issue. There is also a \u utf8-code in your
dump. Till now I followed it into XMLResponseWriter.
Some steps before the result in a buffer looks good and the utf8-code
Dear list,
is there any deeper logic behind the fact that XMLResponseWriter
is sending CONTENT_TYPE_XML_UTF8=application/xml; charset=UTF-8 ?
I would assume (and also most browser) that for XML Output
to receive text/xml and not application/xml.
Or do you want the browser to call and XML-Editor
, 2011, at 7:30 AM, Bernd Fehling wrote:
Dear list,
is there any deeper logic behind the fact that XMLResponseWriter
is sending CONTENT_TYPE_XML_UTF8=application/xml; charset=UTF-8 ?
I would assume (and also most browser) that for XML Output
to receive text/xml and not application/xml
Is there a way to have a kind of casting for copyField?
I have author names in multiValued string field and need a sorting on it,
but sort on field is only for multiValued=false.
I'm trying to get multiValued content from one field to a
non-multiValued text or string field for sorting.
And
and make author multiValued and author_sort a string
field?
Regards
Bernd
Am 17.03.2011 15:39, schrieb Gora Mohanty:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Bernd Fehling
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
Is there a way to have a kind of casting for copyField?
I have author names
moved this from FAST
index-profile to Solr DIH and placed the seperator there.
But now I'm looking for a solution for VuFind.
Easiest thing would be to have a kind of casting, may be for copyField.
Regards,
Bernd
Am 17.03.2011 15:58, schrieb Yonik Seeley:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Bernd
a string
field?
Regards
Bernd
Am 17.03.2011 15:39, schrieb Gora Mohanty:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Bernd Fehling
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
Is there a way to have a kind of casting for copyField?
I have author names in multiValued string field and need a sorting
1 - 100 of 396 matches
Mail list logo
