slamming self closing doors in a vinyl tiled concrete corridor 24/7.
If anyone does a test or mock up of this revolutionary concept please video
it so we can all enjoy.
Dave Phelan
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http
that explains why the stackers in this metro
area all seem to be outside in open parking lots
Dave Phelan
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
of responsibility but more times than not someone gets going on a
tangent where the tree limbs are not designed to support their weight.
Good luck.
Dave Phelan
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http
http://www.northjersey.com/news/110210_Sprinklers_keep_fire_at_Hackensack_pl
ant_in_check.html
Excerpt below from the FD spokesperson
Lt. Stephen Lindner of the Hackensack Fire Department said a passerby
reported smoke coming out of the Kraissl Co. building at 299 Williams Ave.
at 12:48 a.m. He
not to burden the forum list.
Thank you.
Dave Phelan
nomore...@yahoo.com
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email
Looking for some assistance with the following scenario: Combination
sprinkler / standpipe riser typical to multi-family buildings with
individual floor control valves / WF switches.
When does either NFPA 13 and / or NFPA 14 kick in the swing check valve at
the riser connection to prevent
My prior post should have been a little less ambiguous since we have already
broached the topic this month.
I see the check valve in the 2007 and 2010 editions of NFPA 13 but am a
little perplexed by a number of older 1996-ish combination systems that have
the check valves installed in them
I see a few heads listed for dry service in residential systems ..
Interesting but is there a specific DPV that must be used with a residential
system?
A listed head is great but the end result is still water delivery in 15
seconds and that seems pretty tough to achieve without carefully
When you look at the press release they mention at the very bottom to follow
special bulletins TFP 460 and TFP 461 for listing and design information etc
..
Those particular bulletins don't seem to be available off the TFP website
but I'm also not an authorized dealer / installer.
Can
I'm with Dave A. on the issue of 13/13R 'hybrid' designs where a single
building contains both systems where did we see that in the model
building codes which dictate the 'when and where'? If using the IBC then
903.3.1.2 references an NFPA 13R system '... in buildings of Group R...'.
Note
Seismic Design Category and Site Class are indeed two different things -
although inter-connected in concept:
We have the Secondary Onsite Water Supply requirement from the BOCA days and
now IBC codes which relies on the determination of Seismic Design Category
(SDC) as the threshold to apply
Greetings -
Working on a problem currently - here's the synopsis of it:
Building built in 1998-1999 with sprinklers throughout. FDC is located in
the front at the street approximately 25 feet from actual building. FD
responds to a fire and supports the FDC (125 PSI) when they notice red
The metal label on the valve says 'FireLock S/717 Ductile Iron 250 PSI'.
Nothing altered or unusual about the valve's metal tag, the length of pipe
is what got me scratching my head.
From: Dave Phelan [mailto:nomore...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 4:38 PM
To: 'sprinklerforum
I will be able to say for sure on the pipe when they cut it out over the
weekend and I go back for a sample next week. Any thoughts on a better
mousetrap for the new piping to avoid quick deterioration ?
Dave,
From: Dave Phelan [mailto:nomore...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 4
I can assure you the only thing is was wrapped in was clay and rubble rocks
kicking around the jobsite. Not a stitch of restraining or thrust blocking
at the FDC elbow either. I appreciate the guidance and will be sure to pass
along the final result when they cut and remove the pipe from the
.
Dave Phelan
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org
To Unsubscribe, send an email
I do vaguely recall this a few months ago on the forum and forget what we
came up with, so here's just my thoughts before breakfast ...
The standards do not specifically call out a requirement for nail plate or
protection of piping. However, depending on which codes are in effect at
the location
engineering all around, not just
sprinkler design.
Good luck.
Dave Phelan
An AHJ in NJ
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send
appears to be replacement with recognized listed and
labeled components but my curiosity is nagging me.
Thanks much.
Dave Phelan
An AHJ in NJ
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman
Actually the 1940's date was my mistake as I typed with the brain ahead of
the fingers ... what I really meant to say was that they are approx. 40
years old - circa 1973 to 1975 with the original construction of the
building. Thanks for the steering towards the patent file - its 5.5 to 1
and
Greetings -
Just following along on the thread about positioning heads and 13D systems
so I figured I'd throw another two cents in the mix here .
Section 8.6.5 13D -2007 added a section that sprinklers are not required in
elevator machine rooms and concealed spaces including elevator
Greetings to all -
I am working on a project with several 1940 era Grinnell F-300 DPV's - 4
inch. One of the many issues with these systems is the incorrect air
settings from the supplied air system and lack of proper air maintenance
devices. Does anyone have a table or air pressure / trip
and photographs
for an upcoming educational program.
If anyone on the list has such resources I'd appreciate some contact
information or push in the right direction. You can contact me directly off
list if you prefer at the email below. Much thanks in advance.
Dave Phelan
An AHJ in NJ
Just another angle on this question given the occupancy ..
Depending on the quantity and classification of the various hazardous
materials - mostly combustible and flammable liquids I would think - the
prevailing building code may have requirements outside of a straight NFPA 13
Occupancy
In the event that bathroom situation crossed my desk I'd have to go with the
lack of the 8 inch lintel as meaning the 'space with a toilet' is actually
part and parcel to the adjoining space for purposes of number of design
heads. We are calling it a room when it is really about the
Sorry - meant to add one other item
Not knowing the occupancy of the building but sounds like residential - the
bathroom exception applies within the dwelling unit. Does this lintel-less
space open into a public corridor or public area? Wouldn't we be
suppressing this public bathroom then
http://www.northjersey.com/news/51184127.html
See link above where a melted solder joint sprayed water into a developing
fire and 'saved' the day. I would expect the NAHB to begin strong lobbying
efforts shortly to ban copper and solder in home construction as it
apparently leads to water
Are we talking about ceiling fans in residential settings (homes apts) or
those really big helicopter type fans in storage warehouses known as HVLS
(high volume - low speed) ?
Dave P.
An AHJ in NJ on temporary reassignment to the back deck hammock
I agree with all the points raised - particularly with the need for solid
hanger support. I'm not sure which editions you are currently using in your
area but I do point out the following:
NFPA 13R-2002 Edition Section 3.3.6 indicates that dormitories are within
the scope of 13R.
NFPA
http://www.icc-es.org/reports/pdf_files/ICC-ES/ESR-2397.pdf
I know we occasionally get on the topic of design and such for window
sprinklers for alternate design for interior fire rated assemblies so this
might be worth tucking away for future use.
The ICC Evaluation Service has released
I believe the focus on this requirement is that these exterior spaces
(decks, balconies, whatever you call thems) represent an appreciable risk to
the building due to human activity. There have been some losses of
mid-rise 13R properties that were spectacular to watch as an exterior fire
on the
http://www.nfpa.org/assets/files//PDF/Research/HVLS.pdf
George posed an item on his wish list regarding high volume low speed fans
used in warehouse applications, sometimes known by the trade name 'Big Ass
Fans' or also by the Arbon / Rite Hite Company.
This is something I posed about a year
Just some fire based experience with the indoor play areas and outdoor
plastic play equipment sans nationally recognized testing labs or fancy
measuring equipment .
- Salvaged a supply of the plastic balls and components from a fast food
indoor play area while the restuarant was closed
Thanks for the information - I will be adjusting my field acceptance testing
procedures now to include this requirement. I see the problem as being a
gap between the sprinkler installer and alarm tech / electrician. Even if
the sprinkler tech puts in the proper switch with double contacts to be
Something new to me popped up today as we are now using the 2002 editions of
13 72 here.
On a dry pipe sprinkler the National Fire Alarm Code - NFPA 72 states that
the air supervisory sensor shall signal on loss of 10 PSI but also on 10 PSI
greater than the system set pressure. Check out 5.13
Greetings again all,
I am in the process of reviewing plans for the secondary water source to a
high-rise residential building where they are taking water from the pool on
the parking garage roof and piping to the grade level fire pump room. All
indications are that there is enough head pressure
Greetings all,
I was inspecting an 'open' on three sides parking garage today and came
across 8 Sch 10 black pipe being run across the ceiling; one line for FDC
on far side of building and another which will be the city supply line to
the main building fire pump. The city water feed will end up
Good day all
As Roland guessed - I'm going to weigh in with how this AHJ (me) views
impairments.
In my early days as the local official (marshal) I took the position that
impairments needed a fire watch - either using FD personnel in some cases or
privately hired security personnel to
Roland,
Im aware of what NFPA 25 has on impairments and the pre-planned impairment 4
hrs in 24 hrs trigger point including an approved fire watch AND
temporary water supply. Trained personnel are described in the handbook and
appendix to those sections and its all valid. An impairment
. Is this situation outside of the
listing standard (UL1626)? How does the list feel about unusually high
ceilings in 13R systems and has anyone dealt with this in their past
experiences ?
Thank you.
Dave Phelan
An AHJ in New Jersey
___
Sprinklerforum
Dear All,
Let me clarify that in this situation the room has a flat ceiling above. I
understand the intent of wall wetting and agree that regardless of height
there still will be the net effect of wall wetting. It just seems to me
that the prevention of flashover is better served from 8-10 feet
41 matches
Mail list logo