y plus million
> units. The rest, as they say is history, and so was the venerable Central
> Sprinkler Company.
> Mark at Aero
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: Ron Greenman [mailto:rongreen...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 11:35 PM
> To: s
I had always assumed that voluntary didn't mean voluntary on the part of the
consumer anymore than any recall is, but voluntary on the part of Tyco, meaning
CPSC reviewed and accepted Tyco's self-initiated plan. This took CPSC our of an
enforcement loop and allowed Tyco to manage how the recall
> >>>
> >>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprin
> >>> kl
> >>> er.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Greg McGahan
> >> Living Water Fire Protection, LLC <http://w
> Scott
>
> (763) 425-1001 Office
> (612) 759-5556 Cell
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org [mailto:
> sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Ron Greenman
> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 2:19 PM
&
prinklerforum mailing list
> >>>> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> >
> >>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firespri
> >>>> nkler.org
> >
> >>> ___
>
he ten
thousandths place looks impressive but like in the joke where the young
shepherd is ridiculed by his fellows for having relations with the ugliest
goat, SO WHAT? Their still all having relations with goats.
--
Ron Greenman
Instructor
Fire Protection Engineering Technology
Bates Technic
o.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> >
> ___
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> ___
kr.com/photos/photodave85/sets/72157635350726055/
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> >
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.o
eer | Fargo, ND | direct: 701.552.9905 | mobile: 701.371.5759 |
> http://www.kfiengineers.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org
> [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Ron
> Greenman
> Sent: Tuesd
mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
--
Ron Greenman
Instructor
Fire Protection Engineering Technology
Bates Technical College
1101 So. Yakima Ave.
Tacoma, WA 98405
rgreen...@bates.ct
info.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> > er.org
> >
> > ___
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> > er.org
> __
> > ___
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> >
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> ___
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinkl
> great idea and I would do scouting for them, but probably not going to
> happen.
>
> Todd G Williams, PE
> Fire Protection Design/Consulting
> Stonington, CT
> www.fpdc.com
>
> On Aug 30, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Ron Greenman wrote:
>
> > I'm feeling really stupi
gt; Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
--
Ron Greenman
Instructor
Fire Protection Engineering Technology
Bates Technical College
1101 So. Yakima Ave.
Tacoma, WA 98405
rgreen...@bates.ctc.edu
http://www.
;
>
> ___
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.o
> rg
> ___
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
&
behind a
> badge, not because they have command of the codes, ordinances and standards
> that stand behind them. That's the problem. To question them when they
> can't intelligently answer is a threat to exposing them. Therefor you are
> met with anger and push back. Very frus
gt; ___
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
--
Ron Greenman
Instructor
Fire Protection Engineering Technology
Bates Tec
firesprinkler.org
> > ___
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> >
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> >
> >
> >
x27;t the sprinkler demand separate and not additive?
> Similar to standpipe and sprinkler demands. I do a lot fire flow calc's for
> Civil Engineers here and don't add the two together.
>
> Ron F
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sprinklerforum-boun...@lists
ors that are near to the
> pump using smaller pipe size or pressure regulator valve? What is the usage
> while it doesn't change calculation for water demand?
>
> Thanks for patience in answering!
> Reza
> Fluids Mechanical Engineer
> www.sarian.ir
>
>
>
> ___
Bill, I'm surprised your water guys are letting you do this. Happy about it,
but surprised. This side of the hills that wouldn't happen as the "listing"
would void if you change the valve type/style that comes with the assembly. I
even asked USC about this as the only difference between OS&Y, NR
call implies the tank size to be based upon the
> hydraulically calculated demand where the calculation method is not
> qualified to be anything other than how 13 requires a sprinkler demand
> calculation to be done.
> That calculation would reflect whatever the flow overage is for the rem
h was trying post-- think about the
> additional complexity it would add to the original installation and future
> modifications... and I thought I heard from far overhead "K.I.S.S.,
> K.I.S.S." :) ;) :)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ron Greenman [mailto:rongreen..
t to reduce the size of pump and water
> tank? What is the problem with Scenario 1?
> Regards,
> Reza
> www.saeian.ir
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Ron Greenman
> To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 11:14 PM
> Subject: R
ist
>> >Sprinklerforum@lists.**firesprinkler.org
>> >http://lists.firesprinkler.**org/listinfo.cgi/**
>> sprinklerforum-firesprinkle<http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkle>
>> >r.org
>>
> __**
gt; Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> ___
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
&g
; Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
>
> ___
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
>
in the design area
> shall
> > never be less than five" How this number is calculated? while the above
> > calculations indicated that the minimum is either 12 or 7.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Reza
> > www.sarian.ir
> > ___
> > Sprinklerforu
mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
--
Ron Greenman
Instructor
Fire Protection Engineering Technology
Bates Technical College
1101 So. Yakima Ave.
Tacoma, WA 98405
rgreen...@bate
__
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> _______
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> h
plenum be enclosed with type "x" in order to
> apply 8:15. For my own future reference is standard drywall considered
> limited combustible in any case?
> >
> > Brian Harris, CET
> > BVS Systems Inc.
> > bvssytemsinc.com
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
2.1 & 8.15.1.2.2
> correctly I do not need to add a 3rd level of protection in this "plenum"
> area correct?
> >
> > Brian Harris, CET
>
> ___
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.or
_
> ___
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> ___
ment. In particular
> a restaurant with bar, no entertainment, just serves food. What would the
> occupant load have to be to require fire sprinklers?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 4, 2013, at 10:54 AM, Ron Greenman wrote:
>
> > I believe A2 (when a nightclub) in
2013, at 10:42 AM, Ron Greenman wrote:
>
> > Depends on type of assembly. Nightclubs are much lower than say
> > auditoriums. Also there is square footage, elevation in the building
> (below
> > grade, at grade, above grade), and local ordinances.
> >
> >
>
um mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
--
Ron Greenman
Instructor
Fire Protection Engineering Technology
Bates Technical College
1101 So. Yakima Ave.
Tacoma, WA 98405
rgreen...@bates.ctc.
://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> ___
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
--
Ron Gr
making him install sprinklers per the County Fire Code.
Don't know how it turned out or if it's even resolved yet.
--
Ron Greenman
Instructor
Fire Protection Engineering Technology
Bates Technical College
1101 So. Yakima Ave.
Tacoma, WA 98405
rgreen...@bates.ctc.edu
http://www.bates.ctc.edu/f
ahj is looking for. We changed 20 SR heads
> in one compartment with new QR heads because they were painted or damaged
> and now he wants calcs because we did not replace them with exactly the
> same thing.
>
> He finally said that if we could show him they were identical except
_
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
--
Ron Greenman
Instructor
Fire Protection Engineering Technology
Bates Technical College
1101 So. Yakima
him of that!!
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Ron Greenman
> wrote:
>
> > If they have the same nominal K they will calc exactly the same.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Greg McGahan
> > wrote:
> >
> > > These don sa
nts calcs because we did not replace them with exactly the
> same thing.
>
> He finally said that if we could show him they were identical except for
> response time he would allow them.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Ron Greenman
> wrote:
>
> &g
ingwaterfp.com>
> 1160 McKenzie Road
> Cantonment, FL 32533
> 850-937-1850
> fax 850-937-1852
> ___
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/spri
them ...
>
> Steve L.
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org
> [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Ron
> Greenman
> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 12:30 PM
> To: sprinklerforum@lists.firespr
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> > er.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Bobby Gillett
> *Living Water Fire Protection, LLC*
> 1160 McKenzie Rd.
> Cantonment, FL 32533
> (850) 937-1850
> livingwaterfp.com <http://livingwaterfp
r.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
> ___
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
--
Ron Greenman
In
er
> .org
> ___
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler
> .org
> ___
>
ith the arrow??) to install the BFP?? (LOL)
>
> Regards to all.
>
> Jerry
> accentf...@aol.com
> (800) 503.1961
> ___
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.or
___
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> >
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> ___
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.
t;
> ___
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
--
Ron Greenman
Instructor
Fire Protection Engineering Technology
Bates Tech
_
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
>
> ___
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
___
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
> ______
> This email has been scanned
gt; >> To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> >> Subject: RE: Valves on BFP
> >>
> >> Zachary. Unless it was furnished by the manufacturer less valves. But
> my understanding is they can't do that because there's no way to test it
> according
lawn policeman that drives around writing
> tickets for uncut lawns. As with any other government regulation if you
> don't comply you are subject to arrest and imprisonment. Hes probably
> making a good wage and government union benefits as Ohio has lost most
> major employers
roke.
> >
> > I'm curious how many will support government mandates if all citizens
> were ordered to cut all fat food, destroy all booze and cigarettes and run
> a marathon in a year or be imprisoned.
> >
> > It's a different issue? It's just a building c
gt; ___
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> >
> >
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Greg McGahan
> Li
any will retrofit?
>
> Scott
>
> (763) 425-1001 Office
> (612) 759-5556 Cell
>
> ___
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
--
Ron Gr
val of any building permit or plat.
>
> History: L. 2010, ch. 116, § 25; L. 2011, ch. 43, § 1; Apr. 14.
>
> Very sorrowfully yours,
>
> Capt. Frank J. Herrick
>
> _______
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http:/
lding permit or plat.
> >
> > History: L. 2010, ch. 116, § 25; L. 2011, ch. 43, § 1; Apr. 14.
> >
> > Very sorrowfully yours,
> >
> > Capt. Frank J. Herrick
> >
> > _______
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> &g
ut at the street
is working, why does it take some convoluted set of rules full of
exemptions to do the same thing for a backflow?
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Ron Greenman wrote:
> Since my friction loss table has a multiplier for demands up to 335 gpm
> I'm guessing that my 2
> Wouldn't it be easier, if you have a 4" backflow preventer you run
> > 4"
> > > > out the wall, 3" BFP, 3" out the wall, etc...
> > > > That should open her up all the way.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Dav
ler.org
> > Subject: Re: SIGN for Backflow Prevention Assembly Forward Flow Test
> >
> > What would be simple and helpful would be a table similar to the one
> > used for sizing fire pump Suction/Discharge/Relief Valve Piping etc.
> >
> > Since you are not measuring
> > What would be simple and helpful would be a table similar to the one
> used
> > for sizing fire pump Suction/Discharge/Relief Valve Piping etc.
> >
> > Since you are not measuring pressure, you could say 2" up to X gallons,
> > 2.5"
to fully EXERCISE the
> > BFP at what os expected to be the system demand. If no data
> > available, a discussion with the AHJ is warranted. As for benchmarks,
> > only the flow is pertinent and pressure is irrelevant.
> >
> > Roland
> >
> > On Dec 22, 2009, at
resprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> > er.org
> ___
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
>
&g
oard box.
>
> You just cannot make this stuff up!
>
> -Original Message- From: Charles Thurston
> Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2013 10:57 AM
> To: Ron Greenman
> Subject: Re: Paint booth
>
> Hello Ron,
>
> Actually happened in a body shop here after the city in
t; Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.**firesprinkler.org
> http://lists.firesprinkler.**org/listinfo.cgi/**
> sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.**org<http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org>
> __**__
ote:
>
> > Sounds like a good opportunity for a public input.
> >
>
>
> _______
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
ea with fire rolling
> out of the kitchen area, across the seating area, and adults trying to
> extract children, as anything but tragic. She went pale. Consulting
> architect and civil engineer were not phased.
>
> bv
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ron Greenm
s.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> -
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2013.0.3349 / Virus Database: 3209/6521 - Release Date: 07/25/13
>
> _______
> Sprinklerfo
the ceiling or I
> > > suppose the same question is if you only do 634 sq ft in the building
> > then
> > > you have a 634 sq ft design (notwithstanding the phantom design area if
> > in
> > > the '13 13).
> > >
> > > Chris Cahill, PE*
> > > S
f FORTUNE's 100 Best Companies to Work For
> *Registered in: MN
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org [mailto:
> sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Ron Greenman
> Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 10:36 AM
> To:
tely? What was required/done?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bob Knight, CET III
> 208-318-3057
> www.firebyknight.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://list
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 3:05 PM, John Lewis wrote:
> the AHJ reqired a deluge water curtain over the counter for lack of a one
> hour wall between dinning and kitchen.
Good lord!
--
Ron Greenman
Instructor
Fire Protection Engineering Technology
Bates Technical College
1101 So. Yaki
@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> -
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2013.0.3349 / Virus Database: 3209/6518 - Release Date: 07/24/13
>
> ___
; On Jul 25, 2013, at 10:56 AM, Ron Greenman wrote:
>
> > Forest. What were you flowing to discover these failures? Main drain or
> > some special test header? Would a sign with the data requested by the
> > customer that started this thread have had any utility in helping
opened the valve up and the check was damaged, would only open a third.
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jul 24, 2013, at 8:53 PM, Ron Greenman wrote:
>
> > Worked well for plumbing and process piping applications as they are
> > constantly being exercised.
> >
are hereby notified that you are not authorized to
> read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this communication without the
> consent of the sender and that doing so is prohibited and may be unlawful.
> Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the
> message was misdirected.
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> ___
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
ler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
>
> ___
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
> ______
> Dwight
>
>
>
>
> ________
> From: Ron Greenman
> To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 11:25 PM
> Subject: Re: SIGN for Backflow Prevention Assembly Forward Flow Test
>
>
> By the mid-nineties you have the early Ames models purpose bu
rk at Aero
> P. S. Hi Dwight
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Ron Greenman [mailto:rongreen...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 03:25 AM
> To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org <
> sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>
> Subject: Re: SIGN
the mid '90's.
>
> Dwight
>
>
>
>
> ________
> From: Ron Greenman
> To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:12 PM
> Subject: Re: SIGN for Backflow Prevention Assembly Forward Flow Test
>
>
test is to
> > ensure that the backflow device is opening properly. Like the main drain
> > test, the information is only properly assessed when compared to previous
> > tests. Initial system configuration (tests) are often documented at
> > acceptance, but rarely kept in a place
> this oversight, since they cannot waive the requirement.
>
>
> As the AHJ, they can raise the bar by requiring the information be
> provided on a sign and specifying how the data is to be collected and
> evaluated, by including the requirement in the contract language, or a
> referenced standard.
>
> Dwight
orum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> ___
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
--
Ron Greenman
Ins
gt; >
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
> ___
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
>
s that are still going strong. At the
> DOE facility I spent time at, we had deluge systems with 220vdc
> detection systems
>
>
> Roland Huggins, PE - VP Engineering
> American Fire Sprinkler Assn. --- Fire Sprinklers Saves Lives Dallas, TX
>
ne of the areas that is covered in the standard, in
> which case the AHJ and the owner have every right to make the requirement
> to facilitate proper assessment of the water supply to the system over time.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Ron Greenman
> T
_
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> >
> >
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> >
> > ___
> > Sprinklerforum
now?" I replied well...I've had a good run for the past 40
> years...I guess I'll stick with this "Sprinkler Gig"..it's been good to me
> so far!!
>
> John W. Farabee
> Vice President
> Bass United Fire and Security
> Pompano Beach, Fl
>
>
> 561-707-
ering ring on the fitting that must install INTO the hole to allow the
> bolt pads to close.
> Mark at Aero
>
>
> ___
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listi
rinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
>
> ___
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/list
forum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org [mailto:
> sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Ron Greenman
> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 12:51 PM
> To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> Subject: Re: Mechanical Tees
>
> That's why the Above Ground Te
_
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> >
> > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> > er.org ___
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > Sprinklerforum@lists.firesp
rges-Faulconbridge, Inc. | Fire Protection
> Engineer | Fargo, ND | direct: 701.552.9905 | mobile: 701.371.5759 |
> http://www.kfiengineers.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org [mailto:
> sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On
__
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler
> .org
> ___
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@li
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
--
Ron Greenman
Instructor
Fire Protection Engineering Technology
Bates Techn
The "plastic" piping in the attic
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Ron Greenman wrote:
> Or you could protect the piping in the attic with sprinklers, but then
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Brian Harris
> wrote:
>
>> Starting to rethink this
> Brian Harris, CET
> BVS Systems Inc.
> bvssytemsinc.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org [mailto:
> sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Ron Greenman
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 10:30 AM
>
201 - 300 of 2440 matches
Mail list logo
