Re: Making Struts Build Easier (Re: coming out for JSF + Struts, was: Struts JSR?)

2004-03-26 Thread David Graham
(PST), David Graham wrote: Are we really still kidding ourselves that the taglibs are currently supported? No committer actively takes care of them. No one in the community responded to Ted's invitation to support them. We've all moved onto JSTL, JSF, Velocity, XSLT, etc. While

Re: Making Struts Build Easier (Re: coming out for JSF + Struts, was: Struts JSR?)

2004-03-26 Thread David Graham
--- Peter A. Pilgrim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip bean:size we need a simple tag lib action for JSP 1.2 and JSTL 1.0 to get the size of java.uitl.Collection until there is widespread support JSP 2.0 JSTL 1.1 The current proposal is for Struts 2.0 to be based on Servlet 2.4/JSP 2.0 so we

Re: Making Struts Build Easier (Re: coming out for JSF + Struts, was: Struts JSR?)

2004-03-26 Thread David Graham
--- Kris Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nope. logic:match does substring matching. IMO, any tag that does not interact with Struts' core resources should live in the Jakarta Taglibs project. This allows non-Struts projects to benefit from the functionality while freeing Struts to focus on

Re: Counting down to the 1.2.1 release (was RE: Making Struts Build Easier)

2004-03-25 Thread David Graham
--- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 25 Mar 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- Do we want to wait for a Validator 1.1.2, or roll it with 1.1.1? I just fixed a show stopper bug today in validator in CVS and made an accompaning change in Struts

Re: Making Struts Build Easier (Re: coming out for JSF + Struts, was: Struts JSR?)

2004-03-25 Thread David Graham
--- Arron Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whether the classic and el taglibs are one chunk or two isn't hugely important to me either -- I would prefer that this decision be made by developers who've done more work on that code to

Re: Making Struts Build Easier (Re: coming out for JSF + Struts, was: Struts JSR?)

2004-03-24 Thread David Graham
--- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Hope that helps. If we stick to our guns about avoiding dependencies on unreleased software, this won't come up again... it's not Maven's fault! Commons Validator is a special case because it's mostly used with Struts. The standalone user

Re: Separate Tiles From Struts?

2004-03-24 Thread David Graham
When I first started poking around Jakarta, Struts and Tiles were separate projects and were in the process of being merged. I'm not sure why they were joined but Tiles wasn't a commons component, it was another Jakarta project. David --- Matt Raible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone care to

RE: Counting down to the 1.2.1 release (was RE: Making Struts Build Easier)

2004-03-24 Thread David Graham
-Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 12:55 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: Counting down to the 1.2.1 release (was RE: Making Struts Build Easier) --- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 24 Mar

Re: Making Struts Build Easier (Re: coming out for JSF + Struts, was: Struts JSR?)

2004-03-24 Thread David Graham
--- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This makes it easy for the apps to extend a common Maven project.xml. We could still offer a single zip/tarball with all the applications WARs within. /apps - examples - mailreader - tilesPortal - userdb Now that I say it, the same

Re: Making Struts Build Easier (Re: coming out for JSF + Struts, was: Struts JSR?)

2004-03-22 Thread David Graham
Personally, I find the Struts build files to be complex and confusing. I've come to associate Maven with easy builds because building commons components (including the distro, website, tests, etc) is a snap compared to Struts. I agree that storing jars in cvs isn't a good idea which is why using

Re: [PROPOSAL] Struts infrastructure changes

2004-03-20 Thread David Graham
--- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The following is a set of proposed changes to the Apache infrastructure to accommodate the Struts move to an Apache top level project. The idea is to come up with a single agreed-upon set of changes that we can submit to the infrastructure folks

Re: branching 1.2 and 1.3 and CVS reorg for TLP status

2004-03-19 Thread David Graham
--- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 2:48 PM -0500 3/14/04, Ted Husted wrote: I'd say we could branch what we have as 1.2 and start thinking of the HEAD as 1.3. IMHO, the quickest way to sort out what we need to do with the Struts-Chain RequestProcessor is to get it out there as

Re: URL validation - anyone using it?

2004-03-15 Thread David Graham
That's simply the result of another testcase that proves exception handling works as documented. Validator is logging the exception and passing it out to the caller. David --- Adam Hardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 03/13/2004 07:46 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Adam Hardy I provide URL

Re: validator javascript taglib

2004-03-09 Thread David Graham
The typical use case is to generate the static javascript once and store it in a file. I don't understand why you would need to generate the static javascript multiple times. David --- Adam Hardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have put the javascript taglib in its own JSP so that I can call it up

Re: [VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project

2004-03-07 Thread David Graham
+1 TLP +1 Craig as VP David --- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Following up on a brief thread on this list in December [1], Craig, Ted and I have put together a draft resolution to the board of directors [2], along with a cover letter [3], that would promote Struts to an Apache

Re: ASL 2.0

2004-03-07 Thread David Graham
I attempted to apply the patches but Eclipse wouldn't cooperate. I don't have any other cvs tools on my windows box, which is the only one with Struts development setup at the moment. David --- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would anyone have a chance to apply Paul's patch this afternoon?

RE: Validation working, but not stopping action from processing

2004-02-28 Thread David Graham
--- Matt Raible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's one of those days... As soon as I send something to this list, I figure it out. The problem was my validationFailed forward was not resetting the action parameter for my dispatch action and it was hitting save even when it failed. I change the

Re: Why is TagUtils instance final?

2004-02-26 Thread David Graham
--- Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't understand why the instance of TagUtils has been made final: private static final TagUtils instance = new TagUtils(); It's simply following the Singleton pattern. I have no problems with changing this to allow clients to instantiate

Re: [VOTE] 1.2.0 Release Plan

2004-02-21 Thread David Graham
that string in the examples. David The one reference to Struts in the previous license version was related to the section on use of the trademark name. I think that's dealt with in a more general way in the new license. Paul Sundling David Graham wrote: The exact license details can

Re: [VOTE] 1.2.0 Release Plan

2004-02-21 Thread David Graham
Sundling David Graham wrote: --- Paul Sundling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One possible question is from the new boilerplate: Copyright [] [name of copyright owner] Is it just The Apache Software Foundation, like in the 1.1 license? That would be my guess. I think

Re: [VOTE] 1.2.0 Release Plan

2004-02-20 Thread David Graham
--- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Ted Husted wrote: Assuming it was all right with everyone, I'm setting the freeze date for 1.2.0 for tomorrow (Saturday) night. I'm updating the release plan. There are still a lot of enhancement patches that we haven't

RE: [VOTE] 1.2.0 Release Plan

2004-02-20 Thread David Graham
The exact license details can be found here: http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html David --- Karr, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does this involve changing the file header comment to replace the existing license with the new license? That's something that I can relatively easily

Re: html:text disable attribute invalid.

2004-02-17 Thread David Graham
I must be missing something. What in that link indicates disabled is not valid for a text input? David [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/forms.html#h-17.4 Looking at the above reference it appears that the disable attribute is illegal for

RE: string concatenation

2004-02-15 Thread David Graham
Struts has many dependencies already and I'd like to avoid adding one with lang. Why not just size a large StringBuffer and trade memory for speed? David --- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rather than add a new string utility class to Struts, which isn't really where it should belong,

RE: string concatenation

2004-02-15 Thread David Graham
--- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 1:01 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: RE: string concatenation Struts has many dependencies already and I'd like to avoid

Re: deprecate org.apache.struts.taglib.html.ErrorsTag?

2004-02-10 Thread David Graham
--- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's been quite a bit of confusion on the struts-user list this week about the relationships between ActionErrors, ActionMessages, html:errors, and html:messages. Is there any reason not to deprecate org.apache.struts.taglib.html.ErrorsTag

Re: Browser-specific attrs for html tags (was: [Bug 26795])

2004-02-09 Thread David Graham
--- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 9:28 AM -0800 2/9/04, Hubert Rabago wrote: This probably won't be the last request for an attribute which turns out to be browser specific. Perhaps the html taglib can include some mechanism to allow developers to add other attributes. You

Re: Clean Up conf/share

2004-02-03 Thread David Graham
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any reason we can't delete: struts-config_1_0.dtd -- Users should upgrade to at least Struts 1_1 dtd tiles-config.dtd -- This is for pre struts tiles. validation_1_1.dtd -- This moved to commons-validator pre struts 1.1

Re: Validating Formatted Numbers Patch [Bugzilla 26151]

2004-01-16 Thread David Graham
for FieldChecks.validateMask()) Anyway, am I right - is this a bug, or am I just using it wrongly? Niall P.S. If I am right, then it implies no one is using mask and I think thats an argument for my simpler number validation. - Original Message - From: David Graham [EMAIL

Re: Validating Formatted Numbers Patch [Bugzilla 26151]

2004-01-16 Thread David Graham
it. But since David Graham has said he is -1 on this, doesn't that effectively make this enhacement request dead? There wasn't a vote so my -1 is more of an indication that I don't like the idea. Mask is the most flexible validation that allows many things like formatted number validations. If you

Re: Validating Formatted Numbers Patch [Bugzilla 26151]

2004-01-16 Thread David Graham
- Original Message - From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 1:39 PM Subject: Re: Validating Formatted Numbers Patch [Bugzilla 26151] --- Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Graham OK, I decided to look

Re: Push find 'unknown' ActionConfig into ModuleConfigImpl.findActionConfig?

2004-01-16 Thread David Graham
--- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm still a little gun-shy about changing core struts classes. I think the below is the right thing to do, but I thought I'd see first. ModuleConfigImpl.findActionConfig(String path) currently looks for an exact match of the path, and then uses

Re: Action Config wild cards -- why not use regular expressions?

2004-01-15 Thread David Graham
Unless there's a solid use case, I'd prefer to leave things as they are. You're right that only Validator uses ORO and the plan for Validator 2.0 is to replace it with the standard java.util.regex system which is twice as fast. Since Struts 2.0 will depend on Java 1.4 we could add regex action

Re: Why the different parameter counts?

2004-01-14 Thread David Graham
--- Paul Sundling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd be interested in creating a patch for that. I always thought it was abitrary having some number of arguments like that myself. :) I think David is right on needing the single Object version, which is probably pretty common. To imagine why,

Re: Deprecated: ActionError

2004-01-13 Thread David Graham
The ActionError class is deprecated, not any of the tags. html:errors and html:messages work with ActionMessages and ActionErrors objects. If you look at the javadocs you'll notice that ActionErrors is fully replaced by ActionMessages and ActionError is fully replaced by ActionMessage.

RE: Deprecated: ActionError

2004-01-13 Thread David Graham
is the last remaining place that uses ActionErrors in Struts. The proposed move to Commons Resources would remove ActionMessages from Struts so the validate method signature would have to change again once that was completed. David greetings -Original Message- From: David Graham

Re: Checkstyle headers

2004-01-12 Thread David Graham
The copyright dates apply to each file so you can't just update all of them to read the same. Files containing Apache Group are not valid Apache 1.1 licenses and need to be fully replaced with a valid version. David --- Paul Sundling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've created the a regular

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26036] - Remove author tag and consolidate under volunteer.html

2004-01-10 Thread David Graham
I got an error email response from the apache mail server because the commit message was so large so I don't think struts-dev will receive notification. The patch and commit worked flawlessly though. David --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26036] - Remove author tag and consolidate under volunteer.html

2004-01-10 Thread David Graham
David Graham wrote: I got an error email response from the apache mail server because the commit message was so large so I don't think struts-dev will receive notification. The patch and commit worked flawlessly though. David --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DO NOT REPLY

Re: maven checkstyle report

2004-01-10 Thread David Graham
--- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. License file check errors: There is a check to make sure all the source code begins with the license. This is generating errors because the copyrights don't all follow the same years as what it expects to find. It does lead me to question how

Maven status

2004-01-10 Thread David Graham
We have duplicate documentation files in the maven xdocs directory and in the usual docs directory. I updated the docs version of volunteers.xml today and am not looking forward to updating the xdocs version of the same file. What is the status of the Maven build and when are we completely

Re: @author tags in Struts code

2004-01-09 Thread David Graham
to apply your patches. We use cvs diff -u format for the patch files. Unless anyone objects to removing @author tags, go ahead and create a bugzilla enhancement ticket and attach your patch files to that. David Paul Sundling David Graham wrote: --- Paul Sundling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: @author tags in Struts code

2004-01-08 Thread David Graham
of committers (David Graham for instance, since I'm replying to his message) commits it into CVS. It now looks like David was the source for the code and when Top Secret Corp lawyers started sniffing around it'd be harder to find out the true source. I would guess this might end up being

Re: DigestingPlugIn

2004-01-08 Thread David Graham
--- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know I've asked this before, and forget how it turned out, so please forgive me for asking again :) Would it be possible to do an example usage of the DigestingPlugin that sets up static servlet context attributes, as is done by the

Re: Logic:Equal

2004-01-07 Thread David Graham
--- Kamal Gupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a list which has some values which i get from database. I want to loop through the list and get values which are not duplicated for this i think the best way in struts is to use logic:equal. Please post this question to struts-user.

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/web/tiles-documentation/examples/tiles footer.jsp

2004-01-07 Thread David Graham
--- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a reason for removing Cedric's copyright? As I understand it, based on the language in the CLA, Cedric is entitled to keep his own copyright there, if he so desires. Regardless of whether he's entitled I think this change was appropriate.

@author tags in Struts code

2004-01-07 Thread David Graham
The @author javadoc tag topic has been discussed on commons-dev recently and Ted brought it up in a recent struts-dev thread so I thought it might be nice to get the Struts community's opinion on it. Some arguments against @author tags by Greg Stein can be found here: http://tinyurl.com/yrlhu

Re: [STATUS LOG] 30 Dec 2003 - Jakarta-Struts

2004-01-03 Thread David Graham
) * James Holmes (jholmes at apache.org) * David M. Karr (dmkarr at apache.org) * David Graham (dgraham at apache.org) * James Mitchell (jmitchell at apache.org) * James Turner (turner at blackbear.com) * Steve Raeburn (sraeburn at apache.org) * Don Brown (mrdon at apache.org

Re: pagePattern

2004-01-02 Thread David Graham
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was setting up a working test for pagePattern in an application that doesn't use module (the Mailreader Example). It doesn't seem to recognize a pattern like /pages$M$P where it the same application it does recognize a forwardPattern like /do$M$P.

Re: pagePattern

2004-01-02 Thread David Graham
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, here's an alternative: How about combining the exercise-taglib, validator, and upload applications in to single application three modules? That way we can avoid unnecessary complications to the MailReader, eliminate two redundant sets of JARs,

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/actions LocaleAction.java

2004-01-01 Thread David Graham
I don't think the reason for this change is valid. If you only want to use this action in examples and tests it doesn't belong in the standard actions package which allows it to be used in applications and requires support. The action is an ok example but it's not generally seful enough to

Re: tinyurl.com [was: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-stru...]

2004-01-01 Thread David Graham
--- James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe its just me or I'm missing something here, but do we have to use tinyurl.com? I'm not sure I like the idea of relying on a 3rd party for web resource address translation. If continue using this service and something happened and

cc struts-dev

2003-12-31 Thread David Graham
This is just a friendly reminder to add [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the cc list on any bugs you assign to another address. Otherwise, struts-dev won't get notified of changes to the bug. David __ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now

Bugzilla changes

2003-12-21 Thread David Graham
Ted, Why were many bugs said to be marked LATER but then changed to FIXED? Also, some bugs were marked FIXED and I didn't see any corresponding commit messages with the fixes. I've gone through some of these and changed them to LATER but there are so many that I wanted make sure I wasn't missing

RE: Struts 2.0 Ideas (was Re: Struts 2.0 Discussion Forum)

2003-12-19 Thread David Graham
--- Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, PILGRIM, Peter, FM wrote: snip / What kind of Spring Framework classes would you want to use in Struts 2.0? The BeanWrapper and the BeanFactory are interesting ideas. An example of configuring commons DBCP is given

RE: Why you *want* to be on the PMC

2003-12-19 Thread David Graham
I have some real basic questions: 1. Why is it better to be a top level Apache project rather than part of Jakarta. 2. What are the requirements for becoming a top level project? Any URLs/info is appreciated. David --- Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting James Mitchell

Re: Why you *want* to be on the PMC

2003-12-19 Thread David Graham
--- Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Craig R. McClanahan wrote: Presuming a positive vote from the committers, we'd have to make a formal proposal to the ASF Board (like the Ant, Maven, ... communities did, so we can use their

Re: [VOTE] 1.2.0 Release Plan

2003-12-19 Thread David Graham
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, there were a few more outstanding reports that I thought we would have. http://tinyurl.com/ysx3x Notice that 12 of the 29 bugs are custom tag related proving once again how badly we need to move them into their own distro. Six have patches,

Struts EL Distro

2003-12-18 Thread David Graham
The binary Struts build includes struts-el in the contrib directory. Why does struts-el/lib include the commons-*.jars and JSTL jars? The common jars are already distributed with the standard Struts build and the JSTL jars should be downloaded separately. Considering the frequency of Struts

Re: Struts 2.0 Ideas (was Re: Struts 2.0 Discussion Forum)

2003-12-17 Thread David Graham
--- Vic Cekvenich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And even a simple DAO interface, to be used optionaly be people, so they can go back and forth from iBatis to Hibreante or what ever. I started the Mapper project in the commons for this exact reason. It doesn't belong in Struts.

Re: [VOTE] 1.2.0 Release Plan

2003-12-16 Thread David Graham
+1 David --- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've amended the date on the (now venerable) 1.2.0 release plan for this weekend. http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/proposals/release-plan_1_2_0.html I believe the release notes are in good shape now. I already marched through most of

Re: [VOTE] 1.2.0 Release Plan

2003-12-16 Thread David Graham
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The mean number of milestones for a Jakarta stable release seems to be five or six. So, it would not be unusual for us to get 1.2.4 before hitting a General Availability grade. That could be because products using this versioning/release system don't

Re: Running Struts Cactus tests with Ant

2003-12-16 Thread David Graham
--- James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any chance someone wants to throw together a step-by-step-build-struts-with-maven.readme? cd your-struts-dir maven build Anything much more complicated than that defeats the purpose of using Maven. David Anyway, maybe I just need an Ant

Re: Attachment to bug 866

2003-12-07 Thread David Graham
The problem was that the bug was assigned to Ted and [EMAIL PROTECTED] wasn't added to the CC list. I've fixed this so we get emails when this bug is updated. David --- Hubert Rabago [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Last night I uploaded an attachment to bug 866 (Clean Way to Add Parameters to

Re: [VOTE] Joe Germuska as a Struts Committer

2003-12-07 Thread David Graham
+1 Joe has, refreshingly, backed up suggestions with working code :-). David --- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joe has been involved in the Struts community for some time now, and has been a great contributor on the -dev and -user lists, as well as in the bug database. I believe Joe

Re: getDataSource deprecate

2003-12-06 Thread David Graham
--- Vic Cekvenich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Consider if it be good idea to sometime in the future mark getDataSource as deprecated. I think Struts 2.0 is a good time to remove the DataSource support from Struts. Containers are now fully capable of easy JNDI DataSource configuration and will

Re: Feedback on the Dec 1 nightly build

2003-12-01 Thread David Graham
--- stu robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First, thanks for the quick followup last week on the readyness of builds including ValidWhen. I started testing our application against this build this morning. The one would-be showstopper for us (although we work around it) is that the

RE: Maven test run

2003-11-29 Thread David Graham
--- Steve Raeburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've updated the Maven build to generate some documentation. Use 'maven site' to generate it. I copied the documentation over from docs to xdocs. There are some differences between the tags expected by the Maven xdoc transofrmation and our

RE: Maven test run

2003-11-29 Thread David Graham
-Original Message- From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: November 29, 2003 12:31 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: Maven test run David Graham wrote: You're going to delete the old versions in /doc right? We certainly don't want to maintain 2

Re: BUG fix for org.apache.struts.taglib.html.JavascriptValidatorTag

2003-11-28 Thread David Graham
Thanks for the fix idea. It would have been better if you posted this directly to the bugzilla ticket though. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24516 David --- Igor Marchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all. BUG --- I use Struts's ValidatorPlagin in client

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/util MessageResources.java

2003-11-27 Thread David Graham
When changing Struts' messaging classes we also need to update commons-resources with identical changes. Otherwise, we'll end up getting frustrated users and duplicate bug reports when Struts starts using commons-resources. David --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: martinc 2003/11/27 14:14:51

Re: TagUtils.encodeURL performance

2003-11-26 Thread David Graham
UTF-8 is used because it's recommended in the URLEncoder javadoc: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/net/URLEncoder.html David --- yasuhiko yoshikawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do not think always passing UTF-8 as character encoding type is right behavior. As far as I can tell,

Re: 1.2.0 Resurrected

2003-11-25 Thread David Graham
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With the long weekend coming up, I was thinking of rolling up my sleeves and doing whatever needs to be done to cut 1.2.0. Anyone one aware of any serious showstoppers? Nope, the commits have been relatively infrequent and I haven't seen anything

Re: TagUtils.encodeURL performance

2003-11-25 Thread David Graham
--- Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pierre Maury wrote: The patch would need to be usable with different encoding types. Why? The Java 1.3 version doesn't accept an encoding type and we always pass UTF-8 to the 1.4 version. This memory storage seems like a small price to pay for the

Re: Struts throwing away exceptions

2003-11-15 Thread David Graham
Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I ran into this problem a while back, worked around it, but now it is back. Something has gone haywire with a struts web application I am trying to debug. When accessing an URL, I get an HTTP 400 error, with the explanation The request sent by

Re: [struts-chain] Where to now?

2003-11-12 Thread David Graham
--- Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I added what I gathered was the last missing piece to struts-chain, file upload support. I'm really interested in doing whatever it takes to get this up and running as a viable alternative to the

Re: Suggestion: way to execute code after form.validate(mapping, request) fails, but before forward to input

2003-11-11 Thread David Graham
--- Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using Struts 1.1. I want to execute code only if validation fails, but before the forward to the input action. Unfortunately, it seems that RequestProcessor.processValidate() has tightly-coupled these two activities, leaving no way for

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/resources archives.xml consultants.xml powered.xml sigs.xml

2003-11-11 Thread David Graham
Vic, We are tired of your conspiracy theories, flames, gratuitous self-promotion, and generally poor behavior. Your conduct has been absurd and offensive to people that donate their valuable time to the ASF. Your actions on theserverside.com and the Jakarta general mailing list qualify, IMO, as

Re: Conversion to ToStringBuilder

2003-11-09 Thread David Graham
--- Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I think we inherit the dependency on commons lang from some other component. Our use of lang's features is very limited and my preference is to keep it that way. Regardless, toString() is easy

RE: Conversion to ToStringBuilder

2003-11-06 Thread David Graham
- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 10:26 AM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: Conversion to ToStringBuilder I think we inherit the dependency on commons lang from some other component. Our use of lang's features is very limited

Re: Contributing Code

2003-11-06 Thread David Graham
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is my understanding (and please correct me if mistaken) that when one has modified/improved/extended some portion of Struts, it is to be submitted here for consideration. Thus, my little extension: I modified validator-rules.xml so that if a form field is

Re: [Vote]Disable bugs for Struts 1.0

2003-11-04 Thread David Graham
+1 David --- Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to propose disabling filing of NEW bugs for Struts 1.0, I know BugZilla 2.16.3 can do this not sure about 2.14.2 Bugs filed against 1.0 are a waste of time for committers and for reporters. Only bugs filed against 1.1 final,

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24202] - Javascript validation fails for single radio and single checkbox

2003-10-31 Thread David Graham
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-10-31 15:27 --- You should never be rendering only a single radio button because it's a huge usability issue. The user can never uncheck a single radio button once they've checked it. In

Re: [chain] conditionals again

2003-10-23 Thread David Graham
--- Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The next step might be to try and integrate something like Struts Workflow and/or Tiles into the RequestProcessor chain and see what the various Chains look like. I get about a day every three weeks to look at this, but Tiles is what I'm

Re: [chain] conditionals again

2003-10-23 Thread David Graham
--- Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Graham wrote: --- Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, there's about five ways to submit code here. Would you prefer an email attachment, a bugzilla ticket, or some other way? Bugzilla with attached cvs diff -u formatted

Re: Deprecating DiskMultipartReqwuestHandler and friends

2003-10-23 Thread David Graham
+1 for deprecating. David --- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi folks, Any objection to deprecating DiskMultipartRequestHandler and its associated classes? This was the default file upload handler in Struts 1.0, but was replaced by CommonsMultipartRequestHandler for 1.1 and

Re: Nested-EL

2003-10-14 Thread David Graham
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Back in September, David Karr was threatening to do Tiles-EL and Nested-EL. I see that the Tiles-EL has been committed, sweet. Nested-EL seems to be missing. David, have you started working on Nested-EL? If so, how far off is it from being complete? If not,

RE: XMLEncoder class

2003-10-09 Thread David Graham
http://www.google.com/search?q=java.beans.XMLEncoder David --- Mike Jasnowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Didn't you just answer your own question? -Original Message- From: Zakaria khabot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 11:52 AM To: Struts Developers List

Re: Possible Struts/StrutsTestCase bug

2003-10-07 Thread David Graham
--- Mark McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I may have found a problem using Struts/StrutsTestCase with OC4J(9.0.4). Background: I'm running a StrutsTestCase that works in Resin 2.x but when ran in OC4J I get a NullPointerException from org.apache.struts.util.RequestUtils.java line 1806.

Re: The Forrest Option

2003-10-01 Thread David Graham
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don Brown wrote: Further, deciding between Forrest and Maven isn't an either/or situation. There exists a Forrest plugin for Maven and it would be easy to integrate Maven's reports into a Forrest site build. .../ If we did decide to go with

Re: The Forrest Option

2003-10-01 Thread David Graham
--- Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don, I have one request and that is to leave the existing maven files in place since they do currently generate a web site with the reports. I must be confused with the several projects I'm working on. So, Maven is already setup in Struts to

Re: The Forrest Option

2003-10-01 Thread David Graham
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris Gastin wrote: I have to agree with David. Lets find one way to do it and make it simple, if a build process can be. I have worked a little with Maven, and it seems tobe simple. I am not knocking Forrest. I have not had a chance to look into

Re: The Forrest Option

2003-10-01 Thread David Graham
--- Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, David Graham wrote: snip / Rob mentioned something about Struts being setup for Maven already and I asked for clarification. If that's true then I see no point in complicating things with another build tool. Also, it seems

Re: The Forrest Option

2003-10-01 Thread David Graham
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Graham wrote: Rob mentioned something about Struts being setup for Maven already and I asked for clarification. If that's true then I see no point in complicating things with another build tool. Also, it seems that Maven in some ways

Re: [Validator] FieldChecks Serializable?

2003-09-30 Thread David Graham
I don't believe there is any reason it needs to be serializable because objects of that class are never created and saved in other objects. We're just in the habit of making things Serializable in case they go into the session. David --- Brandon Goodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I asked this

Re: Maven is Wicked!

2003-09-30 Thread David Graham
--- PILGRIM, Peter, FM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have been very busy unable to catch with Struts Dev list. Anyway I was fighting with Turbine/JCS trying to compile with Ant, I was literally beating myself up looking at these dependencies, then I read in a forum somewhere Use Maven. I used

Re: The Forrest Option

2003-09-30 Thread David Graham
I haven't used Forrest but Maven was pretty darn easy to get going. All I had to do was download it and run maven jar or maven site:generate. It handled all of the dependencies by itself. Assuming Forrest is as easy to use as Maven, I don't really care which we use. I do prefer to maintain a

RE: XHTML Web site updates

2003-09-29 Thread David Graham
--- Steve Raeburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: September 29, 2003 3:46 AM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: XHTML Web site updates +1 as to the new sidebar approach. I'm quite pleased with the way all

RE: XHTML Web site updates

2003-09-29 Thread David Graham
--- Steve Raeburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: September 29, 2003 12:08 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: RE: XHTML Web site updates And now the downside to using tableless css webpages... Take a look

Re: [VOTE] Accept patches to make html taglib more extensible

2003-09-28 Thread David Graham
--- Sgarlata Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hope it's OK for a non-committer to start a vote. I know this has been a contentious issue, so I would like to clearly outline my plan for making the html taglibs more extensible and I would like a vote before I go to all the trouble of coding,

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >